Evaluation of short-term safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with multiple sclerosis from Latin America

Humoral immune response and safety of Sars-Cov-2 vaccine in people with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

For the past three years, the pandemic has had a major effect on global public health, mainly on those with underlying medical conditions, such as people living with Multiple Sclerosis. Vaccination among this group is of great importance, and the long-term impacts of vaccination and its safety on the health of these patients will continue to be revealed. Therefore, risks related to vaccination and immune response need to be assessed. The objective here was to characterize the immune response, short-term safety, and the effects of multiple variables on these factors after COVID-19 vaccination (mainly Sinopharm) among people with Multiple Sclerosis. We assessed the short-term safety and humoral SARS-COV-2 anti-RBD IgG response using a data collection form and Immunoassay, respectively.

RESULTS

No severe adverse events or MS relapse was observed. Myalgia/body pain (26.7%), low-grade fever (22.2%), and mild headache (15.6%) were the most common adverse events. The use and type of vaccine influenced the frequency of side effects with a p-value < 0.0001. Regarding immune response, patients on rituximab and fingolimod had a lower antibody titer compared to other medications. With a significant difference, hybrid immunity (p-value: 0.047) and type of DMTs (p-value: 0.017) affected the humoral response.

CONCLUSION

There is a low incidence of serious adverse effects, MS worsening or relapse after COVID-19 vaccination, and mainly, side effects are similar to that of the general population. It appears that treatment with various disease-modifying therapies does not induce or worsen the post-vaccination side effects, although some, including Rituximab and fingolimod, may affect the immunity induced after vaccination.

Risk of flare or relapse in patients with immune-mediated diseases following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with autoimmune and immune-mediated diseases (AI-IMD) are at greater risk of COVID-19 infection; therefore, they should be prioritized in vaccination programs. However, there are concerns regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in terms of disease relapse, flare, or exacerbation. In this study, we aimed to provide a more precise and reliable vision using systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for original articles reporting the relapse/flare in adult patients with AI-IMD between June 1, 2020 and September 25, 2022. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to investigate the sources of heterogeneity. Statistical analysis was performed using R software.

RESULTS

A total of 134 observations of various AI-IMDs across 74 studies assessed the rate of relapse, flare, or exacerbation in AI-IMD patients. Accordingly, the crude overall prevalence of relapse, flare, or exacerbation was 6.28% (95% CI [4.78%; 7.95%], I2 = 97.6%), changing from 6.28% (I2 = 97.6%) to 6.24% (I2 = 65.1%) after removing the outliers. AI-IMD patients administering mRNA, vector-based, and inactive vaccines showed 8.13% ([5.6%; 11.03%], I2 = 98.1%), 0.32% ([0.0%; 4.03%], I2 = 93.5%), and 3.07% ([1.09%; 5.9%], I2 = 96.2%) relapse, flare, or exacerbation, respectively (p-value = 0.0086). In terms of disease category, nephrologic (26.66%) and hematologic (14.12%) disorders had the highest and dermatologic (4.81%) and neurologic (2.62%) disorders exhibited to have the lowest crude prevalence of relapse, flare, or exacerbation (p-value < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The risk of flare/relapse/exacerbation in AI-IMD patients is found to be minimal, especially with vector-based vaccines. Vaccination against COVID-19 is recommended in this population.

Short-term safety of inactivated SARS-Cov-2 vaccines in Chinese patients with central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating diseases

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the short-term safety of inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines in Chinese patients with central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating diseases (CNS IDDs).

Methods

A web-based survey was conducted among patients with CNS IDDs from April 15 to 19, 2022 in China. In total, 645 patients with CNS IDDs were identified, including 425 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), 194 with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and 26 with other CNS IDDs. The questionnaire consisted of demographic data, clinical records, history of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, and vaccination-related symptoms within one month after vaccination. The demographic data, clinical information, and relapse rates between vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients were compared.

Results

Among 645 patients with CNS IDDs, 78 were vaccinated and 567 were non-vaccinated with the vaccination rate of 12.1 %. Compared to non-vaccinated group, a lower percentage of patients on DMDs therapy (41.0 % vs. 71.8 %, P < 0.001) and an increased proportion of patients with other vaccination in past 3 years (17.9 % vs. 4.8 %, P < 0.001) were observed in vaccinated group. Six patients experienced a relapse within 30 days of a vaccination. Additionally, vaccine-associated relapse rates in vaccinated patients did not significantly differ from these in non-vaccinated patients among 2020, 2021, and from January 1 to October 1, 2022.

Conclusions

No increased risk of vaccination-associated relapses among Chinese patients with CNS IDDs indicated that inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines appear to be safe for this population.

Safety of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines in autoimmune encephalitis: A real-world cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVE

To assess safety data of the inactivated COVID-19 vaccines in a real-world sample of people with autoimmune encephalitis (pwAE).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed between 1 March and 30 April 2022. We invited pwAE from our previous ONE-WC (Outcome of Autoimmune Encephalitis Study in Western China) registration study database, to attend neurological clinics, at West China Hospital to participate in a face-to-face survey using a custom-designed questionnaire for this study. The ONE-WC study began in October 2011 and prospectively enrolled pwAE from four large comprehensive neurological centers in Sichuan province, China.

RESULTS

Of the 387 pwAE, 240 (62.0%) completed the questionnaire. Half the 240 participants (121, 50.4%) reported receiving at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine, which in all but two patients received inactivated COVID-19 vaccine. Among vaccinated pwAE, the median age was 35 years (range 15-69) and 57.8% of them were women. The most frequent reasons that unvaccinated individuals reported for not receiving the COVID-19 vaccine were concern about vaccine-induced relapse of AE (50.4%) and advice from a physician to delay vaccination (21.0%). Small proportions of vaccinated individuals reported adverse events after the first dose (11.5%) or the second dose (10.2%), and none of the adverse events was serious. Across the entire sample, one individual reported relapsing within 30 days after the first dose and three individuals reported relapsing more than 120 days after the first dose.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world survey indicates an overall favorable safety profile of the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine for pwAE.

Safety of COVID-19 vaccines in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Data are sparse regarding the safety of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVE

To estimate (1) the pooled proportion of MS patients experiencing relapse among vaccine recipients; (2) the rate of transient neurological worsening, adverse events, and serious adverse events; (3) the previous outcomes of interest for different SARS-CoV-2 vaccine types.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacovigilance registries and observational studies.

RESULTS

Nineteen observational studies comprising 14,755 MS patients who received 23,088 doses of COVID-19 vaccines were included. Mean age was 43.3 years (95% confidence interval (CI): 40-46.6); relapsing-remitting, secondary-progressive, primary-progressive MS and clinically isolated syndrome were diagnosed in 82.6% (95% CI: 73.9-89.8), 12.6% (95% CI: 6.3-20.8), 6.7% (95% CI: 4.2-9.9), and 2.9% (95% CI: 1-5.9) of cases, respectively. The pooled proportion of MS patients experiencing relapse at a mean time interval of 20 days (95% CI: 12-28.2) from vaccination was 1.9% (95% CI: 1.3%-2.6%; I² = 78%), with the relapse risk being independent of the type of administered SARS-CoV-2-vaccine (p for subgroup differences = 0.7 for messenger RNA (mRNA), inactivated virus, and adenovector-based vaccines). After vaccination, transient neurological worsening was observed in 4.8% (95% CI: 2.3%-8.1%) of patients. Adverse events and serious adverse events were reported in 52.8% (95% CI: 46.7%-58.8%) and 0.1% (95% CI: 0%-0.2%) of vaccinations, respectively.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 vaccination does not appear to increase the risk of relapse and serious adverse events in MS. Weighted against the risks of SARS-CoV-2-related complications and MS exacerbations, these safety data provide compelling pro-vaccination arguments for MS patients.

Self-Reported safety of the BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) COVID-19 vaccine among Iranian people with multiple sclerosis

To affirm the short-term safety of the BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) COVID-19 vaccine among people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), 517 vaccinated and 174 unvaccinated pwMS were interviewed. 16.2% of the vaccinated pwMS reported at least one neurological symptom in their respective vaccine-related at-risk periods (ARP) - a period from the first dose until two weeks after the second dose of the vaccine. In a multivariable logistic regression model, the presence of comorbidities (P = 0.01), use of natalizumab (P = 0.03), and experiencing post-vaccination myalgia (P < 0.01) predicted the development of post-vaccination neurological symptoms. One MS relapse, one COVID-19 contraction, and one ulcerative colitis flare after the first dose, and four MS relapses after the second dose of the vaccine were the only reported serious adverse events during the ARPs. To show if the vaccine provoked MS relapses, we compared the relapse rate of vaccinated pwMS in the vaccine-related ARP with the annualized relapse rate of unvaccinated pwMS in the prior year-a measure of baseline MS relapsing activity in the respective time-using a multivariable Poisson regression model accounting for possible confounders, which failed to show any statistically significant increase (P = 0.78). Hence, subject to replication-as the vaccinated and unvaccinated pwMS differed in baseline characteristics-the BBIBP-CorV vaccine does not seem to affect short-term MS activity. Furthermore, as 83.33% of the unvaccinated pwMS reported fear of possible adverse events to be the reason of their vaccination hesitancy, provision of evidence-based consultations to pwMS is encouraged. Limitations of our study briefly included lack of data for self-controlled analysis of relapse rates, possible presence of recall bias, and lack of on-site validations regarding the clinical outcomes due to the remote nature.

Relapses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic outbreak raises the question of whether immunization is recommended for patients with CNS demyelinating diseases. On the one hand, existing studies suggested that SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations are not associated with increased risk of relapse activity. On the other hand, case reports with acute CNS demyelinating disease post vaccination were emerging and raising clinicians' attention.

METHODS

In this longitudinal observational study, we included 556 patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and 280 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Each vaccinated patient was matched to two unvaccinated patients according to age, gender, ARR and immunotherapy status, based on propensity score matching model (PSM). The primary outcome is the short- and medium-term risk of relapse, which were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis between groups.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 649 patients (77.6%) have not yet been vaccinated, mainly due to their concerns about relapse. After PSM, 109 vaccinated patients with NMOSD, 218 PS-matched unvaccinated patients with NMOSD, 78 vaccinated patients with RRMS, and 156 PS-matched unvaccinated patients with RRMS were included in the survival analysis to explore the safety of vaccines, with a median of 9-month follow-up. Following the first vaccination dose, 10 patients with NMOSD (9.2%) and four with RRMS (5.1%) experienced an acute relapse. Meanwhile, in the PS-matched unvaccinated group, 15 patients with NMOSD (6.9%) and 12 patients with RRMS (7.7%) presented with an acute relapse. There was no significant difference between the two curves in both NMOSD and RRMS groups over the course of the observation period. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, and symptoms of relapses between the vaccinated and PS-matched unvaccinated groups. Post vaccination adverse events (ADE) were reported in 39 individuals (20.9%).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines appear safe for patients with CNS demyelinating diseases.

Comparing the Use of a Mobile App for Surveillance of Adverse Events Following Influenza Immunization to a Web-Based platform: a Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

BACKGROUND

Vaccine safety surveillance is a core component of vaccine pharmacovigilance. In Canada, active, participant-centered vaccine surveillance is available for influenza vaccines and has been used for COVID-19 vaccines.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of using a mobile app for reporting participant-centered seasonal influenza adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) compared to a web-based notification system.

METHODS

Participants were randomized to influenza vaccine safety reporting via a mobile app or a web-based notification platform. All participants were invited to complete a user experience survey.

RESULTS

Among the 2408 randomized participants, 1319 (54%) completed their safety survey 1 week after vaccination, with a higher completion rate among the web-based notification platform users (767/1196, 64%) than among mobile app users (552/1212, 45%; P<.001). Ease-of-use ratings were high for the web-based notification platform users (99% strongly agree or agree) and 88.8% of them strongly agreed or agreed that the system made reporting AEFIs easier. Web-based notification platform users supported the statement that a web-based notification-only approach would make it easier for public health professionals to detect vaccine safety signals (91.4%, agreed or strongly agreed).

CONCLUSIONS

Participants in this study were significantly more likely to respond to a web-based safety survey rather than within a mobile app. These results suggest that mobile apps present an additional barrier for use compared to the web-based notification-only approach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05794113; https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05794113.

Safety of Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 among Polish Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Disease-Modifying Therapies

(1) Background: The present study aims to report the side effects of vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who were being treated with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in Poland. (2) Methods: The study included 2261 patients with MS who were being treated with DMTs, and who were vaccinated against COVID-19 in 16 Polish MS centers. The data collected were demographic information, specific MS characteristics, current DMTs, type of vaccine, side effects after vaccination, time of side-effect symptom onset and resolution, applied treatment, relapse occurrence, and incidence of COVID-19 after vaccination. The results were presented using maximum likelihood estimates of the odds ratio, t-test, Pearson’s chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact p, and logistic regression. The statistical analyses were performed using STATA 15 software. (3) Of the 2261 sampled patients, 1862 (82.4%) were vaccinated with nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. Mild symptoms after immunization, often after the first dose, were reported in 70.6% of individuals. Symptoms included arm pain (47.5% after the first dose and 38.7% after the second dose), fever/chills/flu-like symptoms (17.1% after the first dose and 20.5% after the second dose), and fatigue (10.3% after the first dose and 11.3% after the second dose). Only one individual presented with severe side effects (pro-thrombotic complications) after vaccination. None of the DMTs in the presented cohort were predisposed to the development of side effects. Nine patients (0.4%) had a SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed despite vaccination. (4) Conclusions: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is safe for people with MS who are being treated with DMTs. Most adverse events following vaccination are mild and the acute relapse incidence is low.