Supportive or Hindering Physical Environments in Hospital Units Dealing With COVID-19 Patients

PURPOSE

This project was designed to discover how hospital units with COVID-19 patients influenced staff's medical practices and health conditions.

BACKGROUND

Although hospital environments have well-known associations with health outcomes, findings are limited in demonstrating the role of physical environments during a global pandemic.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey study was conducted from three units in a university hospital and a total of 113 staff participated. They rated the impact of physical environments on staff members' medical practice and their health conditions before and mid-pandemic. They also specified physical changes, hindering and helpful features, and future improvements in open-ended questions.

RESULTS

The perceived supportiveness of the physical environments on communication significantly dropped from before-pandemic to midpandemic, followed by mental health and feeling of connection and engagement. Separating COVID-19 patients helped staff workflow, but staff felt disconnected and had poor visibility.

CONCLUSION

Based on painful lessons, interdisciplinary researchers, including healthcare professionals, designers, and administrators, should further collaborate to create supportive hospital environments.

Situation awareness in intensive care unit nurses: A qualitative directed content analysis

Background

Situation awareness (SA) is an essential cognitive construct to create positive patient safety outcomes. SA of the nurses in the intensive care unit (ICU), where conditions may change rapidly, is particularly important. The present study aimed to explain the perception and experience of SA in ICU nurses based on Endsley's SA model.

Materials and methods

This qualitative directed content analysis was conducted on nurses in six hospitals in Tehran, Iran, from December 2020 to July 2021. Twenty-seven ICU nurses were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews and field observations. The data were analyzed based on the Elo and Kyngas method modified by Assarroudi et al. COREQ checklist was used to report the research.

Results

The concept of SA in ICU nurses, based on Endsley's model, includes perception of patients' clinical cues, perception of the human environment, perception of the physical environment, and perception of the organizational environment as generic categories of the perception of the elements in the environment. SA in ICU nurses also includes the main categories of comprehension the current situation through a sense of salience and interpretation of cues and projection the future situation through the prediction of patient status into the near future and environmental foresight.

Conclusion

Findings have further developed the concept of SA in ICU nurses based on Endsley's SA model. The insights and knowledge gained from this study can be useful for future practice, education, and research on SA among ICU nurses.

Mapping the impact of ICU design on patients, families and the ICU team: A scoping review

PURPOSE

Scoping review to map outcomes and describe effects of intensive care unit (ICU) design features on patients, family, and healthcare professionals (HCPs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Iteratively developed search strategy executed across seven databases. We included studies (January 2007 to May 2020) exploring ICU design features using any study design. We grouped studies into 12 design features and categorized outcomes into four domains.

RESULTS

Of 18,577 citations screened, 44 studies met inclusion criteria. Newly built or renovated ICUs/ICU rooms were evaluated in 27 (61%) studies; 17 (39%) evaluated existing designs/features. Most commonly evaluated design features were lighting (24, 55%), single vs multi-occupancy rooms/pods (17, 39%), and family-centered design (13, 30%). We identified 63 distinct outcomes in four domains; HCP-related (20, 45%); patient-related (20, 45%); family-related (11, 25%); and environment-related (7, 16%). Eleven (25%) studies measured patient/family-reported outcomes. In studies evaluating single occupancy rooms, three reported increased family satisfaction, two reported decreased delirium burden, while six reported negative consequences on HCP wellbeing and working.

CONCLUSION

Studies evaluating ICU design measure disparate outcomes. Few studies included patient/ family-reported outcomes; fewer measured objective environment characteristics. Single room layouts may benefit patients and family but contribute to adverse HCP-related outcomes.

The intensive care unit environment from the perspective of medical, allied health and nursing clinicians: A qualitative study to inform design of the 'ideal' bedspace

BACKGROUND

While the impact of the intensive care environment on patients' experiences and outcomes has been extensively studied, relatively little research has examined the impact on clinicians and their provision of care in the intensive care unit (ICU). Understanding staff experience and views about the environment is needed to optimise the ICU environment, patient outcomes and staff wellbeing.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to inform design of an optimised intensive care bedspace by describing clinicians' views about the current environment, including experience, impact on performance of clinical duties, and experience and outcomes of patients and family members.

METHODS

A pragmatic, qualitative descriptive study was conducted, with data collected in focus groups and interviews with 30 intensive care clinicians at a large cardiothoracic specialist hospital and analysed using the framework approach.

RESULTS

Participants acknowledged that the busy and noisy ICU provided a suboptimal healing environment for patients, was confronting for visiting families and exposed clinicians to risk of psychological injury. The bedspace, described as small and cluttered, hindered provision of clinical care of various kinds and contributed to an increased risk of staff physical injuries. Participants noted that the bland, sterile environment, devoid of natural light and views of the outside world, negatively affected both staff and patients' mood and motivation. Aware of the potential benefits of natural light, cognitive stimulation and visually appealing environments for patients and families, clinicians were frustrated by their inability to personalise the bedspace. Some participants, while acknowledging the importance of family contact for patients, were concerned about the impact of visitors on care delivery, particularly within already crowded bedspaces, suggesting restrictions on visiting.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive care clinicians perceive that the current intensive care environment is suboptimal for patients, their families and staff and may contribute to suboptimal patient outcomes. The intensive care bedspaces need to be redesigned to ensure they are built around the needs of the people using them. Optimisation is dependent on engaging all stakeholders in future design processes.