Frailty Questionnaire Is Not a Strong Prognostic Factor for Functional Outcomes in Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Patients

Preoperative frailty predicts postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty in older patients: a prospective observational study

PURPOSE

Frailty is reportedly associated with postoperative adverse outcomes and may increase the risk of post-surgical pain. Our study aimed to explore whether frailty was an independent risk factor for pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in older patients.

METHODS

Included in this prospective observational study were patients aged 65 or older who underwent primary TKA. Frailty of the patients was assessed before surgery using the comprehensive geriatric assessment-frailty index and pain was evaluated before and after surgery using the Numerical Rating Scale.

RESULTS

Of the 164 patients including 125 females with a mean age of 71.4 ± 4.6 years, 51 patients were identified as being frail. Patients with chronic post-surgical pain had a significantly higher frailty index than those without chronic post-surgical pain, which was the same in patients with acute post-surgical pain. After adjusting for other confounding factors, frailty was shown to be an independent risk factor for both acute (OR: 13.23, 95% CI 3.73-46.93, P < 0.001) and chronic post-surgical pain (OR: 4.24, 95% CI 1.29-14.00, P = 0.02). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for frailty predicting chronic post-surgical pain was 0.73 (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.65-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrated that preoperative frailty in older patients was a predictor of acute and chronic post-surgical pain after TKA, suggesting that frailty assessment should become a necessary procedure before operations, especially in older patients.

The hidden impact of orthopedic surgeries: Examining the psychological consequences

Orthopedic surgery is commonly considered "quality of life care," as most orthopedic procedures have been shown to provide excellent pain relief and successful surgical outcomes for patients. Although orthopedic surgeries continue to improve patients' functional outcomes through modern surgical techniques and preoperative psychological screening, variation in patient function persists in current studies. Sub-optimal function in patients has been shown to be associated with emotional health burdens, such as anxiety and depression. Previous research has found that preoperative psychological conditions could negatively affect patients' functional outcomes. However, these studies were limited in that they did not examine novel psychological repercussions in emotionally healthy patients following surgery. To address this gap in knowledge, a narrative review was conducted to differentiate specific orthopedic surgeries that have psychological consequences on patients and to determine the current psychological support available for these patients. Data was collected from the Medical Humanities sector of the Texas Medical Center Library and the National Library of Medicine. Studies were included that examined novel psychological effects on patients after undergoing orthopedic surgery. A total of 38 articles were identified, and the majority focused on orthopedic trauma surgery while the rest examined total joint arthroplasty and orthopedic sports procedures. A key finding was that orthopedic trauma surgeries, alone and compared to total joint arthroplasty, result in a greater risk of negative psychological effects, while there was limited data on the psychological effects of orthopedic sports procedures. This narrative review suggests a need to integrate psychosocial support for patients with traumatic orthopedic intervention, regardless of the patient's preoperative psychological state. Furthermore, more research examining the mental well-being of patients following elective orthopedic surgeries is necessary to determine if these operations would benefit from postoperative psychological support as well.

The impact of frailty on patient-reported outcomes following hip and knee arthroplasty

AIM

to determine the impact of frailty on patient-reported outcomes following hip and knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

we used linked primary and secondary care electronic health records. Frailty was assessed using the electronic frailty index (categorised: fit, mild, moderate, severe frailty). We determined the association between frailty category and post-operative Oxford hip/knee score (OHS/OKS) using Tobit regression. We calculated the proportion of patients in each frailty category who achieved the minimally important change (MIC) in OHS (≥8 points) and OKS (≥7 points) and the proportion who reported a successful outcome (hip/knee problems either 'much better' or 'a little better' following surgery).

RESULTS

About 42,512 people who had a hip arthroplasty and 49,208 who had a knee arthroplasty contributed data. In a Tobit model adjusted for pre-operative OHS/OKS, age, sex and quintile of index of multiple deprivation, increasing frailty was associated with decreasing post-operative OHS and OKS, respectively, β-coefficient (95% CI) in severely frail versus fit, -6.97 (-7.44, -6.49) and - 5.88 (-6.28, -5.47). The proportion of people who achieved the MIC in OHS and OKS, respectively, decreased from 92 and 86% among fit individuals to 84 and 78% among those with severe frailty. Patient-reported success following hip and knee arthroplasty, respectively, decreased from 97 and 93% among fit individuals to 90 and 83% among those with severe frailty.

CONCLUSION

frailty adversely impacts on patient-reported outcomes following hip and knee arthroplasty. However, even among those with severe frailty, the large majority achieved the MIC in OHS/OKS and reported a successful outcome.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Frailty at 6 months FollOwing Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With End-Stage OA

Introduction

Lower-limb osteoarthritis (OA) in the elderly can be a risk factor for frailty, which is the preliminary of disability, but it may be reversible with appropriate interventions. We aimed to use the Kihon Check List (KCL) to assess multiple domains of frailty and to identify the characteristics of frailty in patients with hip or knee OA following total joint arthroplasty.

Materials and Methods

This study included 136 ≥ 65-year-old patients (mean age: 73.0 years) who underwent total arthroplasty with end-stage hip and knee OA. We assessed frailty status, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) according to the KCL, functional ambulatory index (FAI) and EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ5D), respectively, as well as the extent of pain preoperatively and at postoperative 6 months.

Results

Using KCL, seventy-eight (57.4%) patients were frail preoperatively, but the prevalence significantly decreased to 52 patients (38.2%) at postoperative 6 months. Total arthroplasty intervention provided significant improvements in the total KCL scores, including the physical domain (P < .01), pain (P < .01), FAI scores (P < .01), and EQ5D (P < .01), but not the social domain. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age at surgery (OR: .93, 95% CI: .86-.99) and preoperative FAI score (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03-1.19) as independent predictors of postoperative frailty.

Conclusions

Total arthroplasty procedures on patients with hip and knee OA reduced their KCL score, but social aspects were less improved than physical aspects in the shortterm. Older age and preoperative lower IADL score can be useful for accurately estimating less improvement of frailty in the early postoperative phase. Our results suggest that long term follow-up of OA is needed to provide comprehensive interventions, including in social aspects, especially for patients with lower activity.

Is Frailty Associated with Adverse Outcomes After Orthopaedic Surgery?: A Systematic Review and Assessment of Definitions

BACKGROUND

There is increasing evidence supporting the association between frailty and adverse outcomes after surgery. There is, however, no consensus on how frailty should be assessed and used to inform treatment. In this review, we aimed to synthesize the current literature on the use of frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes following orthopaedic surgery by (1) identifying the frailty instruments used and (2) evaluating the strength of the association between frailty and adverse outcomes after orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify articles that reported on outcomes after orthopaedic surgery within frail populations. Only studies that defined frail patients using a frailty instrument were included. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Study demographic information, frailty instrument information (e.g., number of items, domains included), and clinical outcome measures (including mortality, readmissions, and length of stay) were collected and reported.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 630 articles. Of these, 177 articles underwent full-text review; 82 articles were ultimately included and analyzed. The modified frailty index (mFI) was the most commonly used frailty instrument (38% of the studies used the mFI-11 [11-item mFI], and 24% of the studies used the mFI-5 [5-item mFI]), although a large variety of instruments were used (24 different instruments identified). Total joint arthroplasty (22%), hip fracture management (17%), and adult spinal deformity management (15%) were the most frequently studied procedures. Complications (71%) and mortality (51%) were the most frequently reported outcomes; 17% of studies reported on a functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consensus on the best approach to defining frailty among orthopaedic surgery patients, although instruments based on the accumulation-of-deficits model (such as the mFI) were the most common. Frailty was highly associated with adverse outcomes, but the majority of the studies were retrospective and did not identify frailty prospectively in a prediction model. Although many outcomes were described (complications and mortality being the most common), there was a considerable amount of heterogeneity in measurement strategy and subsequent strength of association. Future investigations evaluating the association between frailty and orthopaedic surgical outcomes should focus on prospective study designs, long-term outcomes, and assessments of patient-reported outcomes and/or functional recovery scores.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Preoperatively identifying high-risk orthopaedic surgery patients through frailty instruments has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Frailty screenings can create opportunities for targeted intervention efforts and guide patient-provider decision-making.

Modified frailty index as a predictor of the long-term functional result in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty

OBJECTIVES

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a well-approved method for the treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis (OA). Due to rising life expectancy, elderly patients burdened with multimorbidity are subjected to THA. Some of these patients present significant depletion of physiological reserves, which is described as the frailty syndrome. This study aims to assess the influence of frailty on the THA outcomes in OA patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center observational study was conducted to investigate the effect of frailty measured by the modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5) and modified frailty index-11 (mFI-11) on the long-term post-THA outcomes. The analysis included 597 initially screened patients subjected to unilateral, primary THA due to hip OA. The outcomes were assessed during a follow-up visit 3 years after THA. The primary outcome measures were patient-reported (the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index - WOMAC) and physician-reported scales (the Harris Hip Score - HHS). The secondary outcome measures were the length of hospital stay (LOS), pain complaints, complications, and satisfaction. A correlation analysis was performed (Spearman's R).

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-five patients met the eligibility criteria, including 57.26% women (n = 209) and 42.74% men (n = 156). The mean age was 65.11 ±12.12 years. Patients with high values of mFI-5 (r = 0.19; p < 0.05) and mFI-11 (r = 0.22; p < 0.01) achieved less satisfactory functional outcomes after THA (WOMAC). After age adjustment, mFI-11 (r = 0.17; p < 0.05) was a better predictor of functional outcome (WOMAC) than mFI-5 was (r = 0.15; p = 0.07). The mFI-5 (r = 0.25; p < 0.001) and mFI-11 (r = 0.29; p < 0.001) correlated with longer LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5) and modified frailty index-11 (mFI-11) are useful tools to identify patients subjected to THA at a high risk of poor functioning after the procedure. They can be used in preoperative counseling before obtaining informed consent to support surgical decision-making. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the impact of the mFI on long-term postoperative functional results in OA treated with THA.