Preoperative Assessment of Bone Density Using MRI-Based Vertebral Bone Quality Score Modified for Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery

MRI-based endplate bone quality score independently predicts cage subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy fusion

BACKGROUND

To reduce the amount of radiation that patients receive during surgery, surgeons can evaluate the quality of the bone prior to surgery using computed tomography (CT) or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Recently, lumbar spine vertebral bone quality has been evaluated using an MRI-based scoring system. However, few studies have investigated the connection between cage subsidence in patients following cervical interbody fusion and site-specific MRI bone evaluation. It is unknown how cage subsidence following anterior cervical corpectomy decompression and fusion is related to MRI-based endplate bone quality assessment.

PURPOSE

To create a similar MRI-based cervical spine scoring system (C-EBQ) and to investigate the predictive value of the MRI cervical endplate bone quality (C-EBQ) score for cage subsidence after ACCF.

METHODS

The patients' demographic, surgical, and radiological data were collected. Cage subsidence was defined as fusion segment height loss ≥ 3 mm. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to determine correlations between potential risk factors and subsidence, and simple linear regression analyses of statistically significant indicators were performed.

RESULTS

Among the patients who underwent single-level ACCF, 72 met the requirements for inclusion. The C-VBQ scores also improved from 2.28 ± 0.12, indicating no subsidence, to 3.27 ± 0.35, which indicated subsidence, and the C-EBQ scores improved in both the nonsubsidence group (1.95 ± 0.80) and the subsidence group (2.38 ± 0.54). There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) among the groups. Higher C-EBQ scores were strongly correlated with subsidence in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 17.249, 95% CI = 2.269 to 7.537, P < 0.001), and the C-VBQ score was the major independent predictor of subsidence following ACCF ([OR] = 4.752, 95% CI = 3.824 to 8.781, P < 0.05). The C-EBQ score outperformed the C-VBQ score (75.6%) in terms of predictive accuracy, with a ROC curve indicating an 89.4% score.

CONCLUSIONS

After ACCF, cage subsidence was strongly correlated with higher C-EBQ scores on preoperative MRI. Assessing C-EBQ before ACCF may be a useful way to estimate the likelihood of postoperative subsidence.

Bone Density of Vertebral Bodies and Ossified Masses in Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: An Imaging Study Based on MRI, CT, and DEXA

Complications from anterior decompression fusion for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) are often related to the bone mineral density (BMD) of vertebral bodies and ossified masses. The aim of this study was to clarify whether dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) T-scores reliably predict BMD in these structures, and whether vertebral bone quality (VBQ) and Hounsfield units (HU) can be effectively used to screen for osteopenia and osteoporosis. A total of 122 patients with cervical OPLL and 105 non-OPLL patients were included. Vertebral BMD was assessed by VBQ and HU, and ossified mass BMD was assessed by ossified mass bone quality (OMBQ) and ossification mass HU (OMHU). Overall, VBQ scores and HU values demonstrated weaker correlations with T-scores in the OPLL group compared with the non-OPLL group. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that VBQ and HU effectively discriminated osteopenia/osteoporosis in the OPLL cohort, with area under the curve values ranging from 0.763 to 0.827, similar to the non-OPLL. No significant differences in BMD were observed between the OPLL and non-OPLL groups based on the common assessment of VBQ, HU and DEXA-derived BMD (p > 0.05). Both OMBQ and OMHU showed good reliability and were significantly correlated with T-scores (p < 0.05). In patients with cervical OPLL, VBQ and HU remain effective screening tools for osteopenia/osteoporosis, potentially guiding or obviating the need for further DEXA scans. Additionally, our findings suggest that patients with lower T-scores may exhibit reduced BMD in both vertebral bodies and ossified masses.

The diagnostic value of MRI-based vertebral bone quality score for osteoporosis or osteopenia in patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a meta-analysis

The importance of osteoporosis assessment before lumbar surgery is well recognized. The MRI-based Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) score is introduced to evaluate bone quality; however, its diagnostic value has not been well documented. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to summarize the diagnostic value of the VBQ score for osteoporosis or osteopenia in patients undergoing lumbar surgery. We comprehensively searched electronic databases for studies exploring the diagnostic accuracy of the VBQ score for osteoporosis/osteopenia in patients with lumbar disease following the PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the included studies was assessed. The VBQ scores were compared between the groups, and the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were calculated. Publication bias was assessed, and meta-regression was conducted. We included 17 studies with a total of 2815 patients, with a mean age of 66.4 years and a percentage of females of 72.5%. According to the QUADAS-2 tool, the quality of the included studies was relatively high. The results showed a significantly higher VBQ score in the osteoporosis/osteopenia group compared with the control group. According to the mean VBQ cutoff value of 3.02 ± 0.38 for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 and 0.74, respectively, and the AUC was 0.81. According to the mean VBQ cutoff value of 2.31 ± 0.18 for the diagnosis of osteopenia, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.78 and 0.58, respectively, and the AUC was 0.76. The MRI-based VBQ score could provide useful information for identifying patients with low bone mass who need further evaluation. Future prospective studies are still needed to evaluate the complementary role of the VBQ score.

Diagnostic value of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality score for bone mineral density assessment: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Many studies have explored the application of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score as a tool for opportunistic osteoporosis screening before spine surgery. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies to determine the diagnostic value of the VBQ score for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment.

Methods

The PubMed, EBSCO, Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical databases were searched to retrieve original studies on VBQ and BMD published from inception to 31 December 2023 with no restrictions on language and the reference standard of BMD. The quality of the included articles was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). Summary accuracy metrics were obtained by bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) analysis was used to evaluate the performance of the VBQ score. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to examine the source of heterogeneity.

Results

In total, 23 studies, comprising 2981 patients, from 2022 to 2023, of high- or medium-to-high scientific quality were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of the VBQ score in the assessment of BMD were 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.81; P<0.001], 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59-0.71; P<0.001), and 6.49 (95% CI, 4.82-8.73; P<0.001), respectively, with an area under the SROC curve of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.82; P<0.001). The presence of heterogeneity was found to have a significant association with factors such as the reference standard, sex, mean age, region of publication, VBQ method, and magnet field strength.

Conclusions

The MRI-based VBQ score has some diagnostic value in detecting osteoporosis. The VBQ score could be used as a tool for opportunistic osteoporosis screening before spine surgery.

Using advanced imaging to measure bone density, compression fracture risk, and risk for construct failure after spine surgery

Low bone mineral density (BMD) can predispose to vertebral body compression fractures and postoperative instrumentation failure. DEXA is considered the gold standard for measurement of BMD, however it is not obtained for all spine surgery patients preoperatively. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that more routinely acquired spine imaging studies such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be opportunistically used to measure BMD. Here we review available studies that assess the validity of opportunistic screening with CT-derived Hounsfield Units (HU) and MRI-derived vertebral vone quality (VBQ) to measure BMD of the spine as well the utility of these measures in predicting postoperative outcomes. Additionally, we provide screening thresholds based on HU and VBQ for prediction of osteopenia/ osteoporosis and postoperative outcomes such as cage subsidence, screw loosening, proximal junctional kyphosis, and implant failure.

A novel MRI-based Cervical-Endplate Bone Quality score independently predicts cage subsidence after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative cage subsidence after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) often has adverse clinical consequences and is closely related to Bone Mineral Density (BMD). Previous studies have shown that cage subsidence can be better predicted by measuring site-specific bone density. MRI-based Endplate Bone Quality (EBQ) scoring effectively predicts cage subsidence after lumbar interbody fusion. However, there is still a lack of studies on the practical application of EBQ scoring in the cervical spine.

PURPOSE

To create a similar MRI-based scoring system for Cervical-EBQ (C-EBQ) and to assess the correlation of the C-EBQ with endplate Computed Tomography (CT)-Hounsfield Units (HU) and the ability of this scoring system to independently predict cage subsidence after ACDF, comparing the predictive ability of the C-EBQ with the Cervical-Vertebral Bone Quality (C-VBQ) score.

METHODS

A total of 161 patients who underwent single-level ACDF for degenerative cervical spondylosis at our institution from 2012 to 2022 were included. Demographics, procedure-related data, and radiological data were collected, and Pearson correlation test was used to determine the correlation between C-EBQ and endplate HU values. Cage subsidence was defined as fusion segment height loss of ≥ 3 mm. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and area-under-the-curve values were used to assess the predictive ability of C-EBQ and C-VBQ. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed to identify potential risk factors associated with subsidence.

RESULTS

Cage subsidence was present in 65 (40.4%) of 161 patients. The mean C-EBQ score was 1.81 ± 0.35 in the group without subsidence and 2.59 ± 0.58 in the group with subsidence (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that a higher C-EBQ score was significantly associated with subsidence (OR = 5.700; 95%CI = 3.435-8.193; P < 0.001), was the only independent predictor of cage subsidence after ACDF, had a predictive accuracy of 93.7%, which was superior to the C-VBQ score (89.2%), and was significantly negatively correlated with the endplate HU value (r = -0.58, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher C-EBQ scores were significantly associated with postoperative cage subsidence after ACDF. There was a significant negative correlation between C-EBQ and endplate HU values. The C-EBQ score may be a promising tool for assessing preoperative bone quality and postoperative cage subsidence and is superior to the C-VBQ.

Preoperative MRI-based endplate quality: a novel tool for predicting cage subsidence after anterior cervical spine surgery

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to examine the predictive value of a newly developed MRI-based Endplate Bone Quality (EBQ) in relation to the development of cage subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

Patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative cervical diseases between January 2017 and June 2022 were included. Correlation between EBQ scores and segmental height loss was analyzed using Pearson's correlation. ROC analyses were employed to ascertain the EBQ cut-off values that predict the occurrence of cage subsidence. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the risk factors associated with postoperative cage subsidence.

RESULTS

23 individuals (14.56%) exhibited the cage subsidence after ACDF. In the nonsubsidence group, the average EBQ and lowest T-score were determined to be 4.13 ± 1.14 and - 0.84 ± 1.38 g/cm2 respectively. In contrast, the subsidence group exhibited a mean EBQ and lowest T-score of 5.38 ± 0.47 (p < 0.001) and - 1.62 ± 1.34 g/cm2 (p = 0.014), respectively. There was a significant positive correlation (r = 0.798**) between EBQ and the segmental height loss. The EBQ threshold of 4.70 yielded optimal sensitivity (73.9%) and specificity (93.3%) with AUC of 0.806. Furthermore, the lowest T-score (p = 0.045, OR 0.667) and an elevated cervical EBQ score (p < 0.001, OR 8.385) were identified as significant risk factors for cage subsidence after ACDF.

CONCLUSIONS

The EBQ method presents itself as a promising and efficient tool for surgeons to assess patients at risk of cage subsidence and osteoporosis prior to cervical spine surgery, utilizing readily accessible patient data.

Comparison of the predictive values of MRI-based vertebral bone quality scores for the determination of osteoporosis in different diseases

PURPOSE

The study aimed to examine the consistency of vertebral bone quality (VBQ) scores for assessing osteoporosis across different etiologies and explore the predictive value of various VBQ scores for fragility vertebral fractures.

METHODS

Patients with fragility fractures were matched by age and sex to patients with lumbar degeneration. VBQ scores were calculated in T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Differential analysis of bone quality was performed based on etiology.

RESULTS

A total of 96 inpatients were retrospectively enrolled. VBQT1 scores were only sensitive to osteoporotic bone in degenerative group (p < 0.01), failing to identify osteoporosis in fractured group (p > 0.05). For the degenerative group, the area under the curve (AUC) using the VBQT1 scores to differentiate osteoporosis was 0.72. After controlling the confounding variables, only VBQT2 scores were significantly higher in fractured group than degenerative group, with a greater AUC of 0.82 predicting fragility fractures. VBQT1 scores moderately correlated with femoral neck T-scores in degenerative group (r = -0.45, p < 0.01) but not in fractured group (r = -0.24, p > 0.05). VBQT2 scores were not associated with femoral neck T-scores (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to evaluate the effectiveness of VBQs scores in assessing osteoporosis post-fracture. Only non-fractured patients' bone quality is fully susceptible to VBQT1 scores. While VBQT1 scores may not correlate with fragility fractures, VBQT2 scores present a viable alternative.

Comparative Analysis of the 3 Cervical Vertebral Bone Quality (C-VBQ) Score Methodologies and Their Correlations to the Lumbar Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) Score

OBJECTIVE

Common complications after spinal fusion, such as pseudoarthrosis, cage subsidence, or instrumentation failure, are affected by patients' bone quality. The cervical-vertebral bone quality (C-VBQ) score, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based adaption of the lumbar vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score, was developed by 3 separate research groups simultaneously to evaluate bone quality in cervical spinal fusion patients. We present the first analysis comparing these scoring methods to the well-validated VBQ score.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of data for consecutive patients who underwent spine surgery at a single institution was completed. The VBQ score was calculated using the Ehresman et al.

METHOD

The C-VBQ scores, named according to placement of the region of interest within the cerebral spinal fluid, were calculated separately using the methods of Soliman et al. (C2-VBQ), Razzouk et al. (C5-VBQ), and Huang et al. (T1-VBQ). Linear regression models were utilized to evaluate correlations to the VBQ score.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients were identified (mean age, 57.0 ± 11.9 years; women, 50.5%). Mean scores were C2-VBQ, 2.37 ± 0.55; C5-VBQ, 2.36 ± 0.61; and T1-VBQ, 2.64 ± 0.68. The C-VBQ scores for the C2 level were significantly higher than those for the C3-C6 levels (3.18 ± 0.96 vs. 2.63 ± 0.77, P < 0.001), whereas the C7 level was found to have significantly lower C-VBQ scores (2.42 ± 0.78 vs. 2.63 ± 0.77, P = 0.04). The C2-VBQ (r = 0.63) score had the strongest correlation to the VBQ score, compared to C5-VBQ (r = 0.41) and T1-VBQ (r = 0.43) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the C2-VBQ had the strongest correlation to the lumbar VBQ score among all C-VBQ scores.

Different cervical vertebral bone quality scores for bone mineral density assessment for the patients with cervical degenerative disease undergoing ACCF/ACDF: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging-based study

BACKGROUND

Bone mineral density (BMD) is important for the outcome of cervical spine surgery. As the gold standard of assessing BMD, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans are often not ordered or go unreviewed in patients' charts. As the supplement, MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) was found to accurately predict osteopenia/osteoporosis and postoperative complications in lumbar spine. However, discussion of the efficiency of VBQ in cervical spine is lacking. And measurement methods of VBQ in cervical spine are diverse and not universally acknowledged like lumbar spine. We aimed to compare the predictive performance of three kinds of different Cervical-VBQ (C-VBQ) scores for bone mineral density assessment in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. HU value of cervical spine was set as a reference.

METHODS

Adult patients receiving cervical spine surgery for degenerative diseases were retrospectively included between Jan 2015 and Dec 2022 in our hospital. The VBQ scores and HU value were measured from preoperative MRI and CT. The correlation between HU value/C-VBQs (named C-VBQ1/2/3 according to different calculating methods) and DEXA T-score was analyzed using univariate linear correlation and Pearson's correlation. We evaluated the predictive performance of those two parameters and achieved the most appropriate cutoff value by comparing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

106 patients (34 patients with T ≥ - 1.0 vs 72 patients with T < - 1.0) were included (mean age: 51.95 ± 10.94, 48 men). According to Pearson correlation analysis, C-VBQ1/2/3 and HU value were all significantly correlated to DEXA T-score (Correlation Coefficient (r): C-VBQ1: - 0.393, C-VBQ2: - 0.368, C-VBQ3: - 0.395, HU value: 0.417, p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated (C-VBQ1: 0.717, C-VBQ2: 0.717, C-VBQ3: 0.727, HU value: 0.746). The AUC of the combination of C-VBQ3 and HU value was 0.786. At last, the most appropriate cutoff value was determined (C-VBQ1: 3.175, C-VBQ2: 3.005, C-VBQ3: 2.99, HU value: 299.85 HU).

CONCLUSIONS

Different MRI-based C-VBQ scores could all be potential and alternative tools for opportunistically screening patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis before cervical spine surgery. Among them, C-VBQ calculated in ASIC2-C7/SIT1-CSF performed better. We advised patients with C-VBQ higher than cutoff value to accept further BMD examination.

A meta-analysis of the value of MRI-based VBQ scores for evaluating osteoporosis

Objective

Osteoporosis is the most common skeletal disease in humans. Early onset of osteoporosis is usually asymptomatic, so early diagnosis is critical. The purpose of this study was to analyze the value of MRI-based VBQ scores for evaluating osteoporosis.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library databases, Web of Science, and some Chinese electronic databases for published articles and the ClinicalTrials.gov site for completed but unpublished studies on evaluating the value of MRI-based VBQ scores for evaluating osteoporosis. We calculated the summarized sensitivity, specificity, the ROC curve (AUC) values and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using MetaDiSc 1.4 software and STATA.

Results

Our study included 8 studies involving 999 patients of which 660 patients were diagnosed with osteopenia/osteoporosis, and 339 patients were identified as having normal BMD. The pooled sensitivity was 0.809 (95% CI, 0.777-0.838, I 2  = 78.8%), the pooled specificity was 0.640 (95% CI, 0.587-0.691, I 2  = 85.9%), and the pooled AUC was 0.8375.

Conclusion

MRI-based VBQ scores provided high sensitivity and moderate specificity in detecting osteoporosis. Opportunistic use of VBQ scores could be considered, e.g. before lumbar spine surgery.

Prospero registration number

CRD42022377024.

MRI-based Endplate Bone Quality score independently predicts cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has closely correlated with poor vertebral bone quality. Studies have shown better predictive value for cage subsidence by measuring bone density at specific site. However, few studies have been performed to examine the relationship between site-specific MRI bone assessment and cage subsidence in patients who have undergone lumbar interbody fusion. The association between MRI-based assessment of endplate bone quality and cage subsidence after TLIF remains unclear.

PURPOSE

To study the predictive value of MRI-based endplate bone quality (EBQ) score for cage subsidence following TLIF, using QCT bone densitometry as a reference standard.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 280 adult patients undergoing single-segment TLIF for degenerative lumbar spine disease from 2010 to 2020 at our institution who had preoperative T1-weighted MRIs.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Cage subsidence, disc height, endplate bone quality (EBQ) score, bone mineral density, fusion rate.

METHODS

The retrospective study reviewed patients who underwent TLIF at one institution between March 2010 and October 2020. Cage subsidence was measured with postoperative lumbar X-rays based on the cage protrusion through into the superior or inferior end plate or both by more than 2 mm. The EBQ score was measured from preoperative T1-weighted MRI in accordance with the previously reported method.

RESULTS

Cage subsidence was observed in 42 of the 280 patients. Bone densitometry with quantitative computed tomography was visibly reduced in the subsidence group. The mean EBQ scores of the lumbar endplate bone was 4.3±0.9 in nonsubsidence and 5.0±0.6 in subsidence. On multivariate logistic regression, the difference between the two groups was remarkable. Risk of cage subsidence increases significantly with higher EBQ scores (odds ratio [OR]=2.063, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.365-3.120, p=.001) and was an independent factor in predicting subsidence after TLIF. On receiver operating characteristic curve, the AUC for the EBQ score was 0.820 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.755-0.844) and the most suitable threshold for the EBQ score was 4.730 (sensitivity: 76.2%, specificity: 83.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher EBQ scores measured on preoperative MRI correlated significantly with cage subsidence following TLIF. Performing EBQ assessment prior to TLIF may be a valid method of predicting the risk of postoperative subsidence.

Letter to the Editor concerning "Comparison of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar vertebral bone quality scores for increased utility of bone mineral density screening" by Razzouk J, Ramos O, Ouro-Rodrigues E, et al. [Eur Spine J (2022): doi:10.1007/s00586-022-07484-5]

PURPOSE

Write a letter to editors concerning: Comparison of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar vertebral bone quality scores for increased utility of bone mineral density screening by Razzouk et al. (Eur Spine J https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07484-5 , 2022). We try to compare the targeted article with a similar article to talk about cervical vertebral bone quality (VBQ).

METHODS

Read and compare the targeted article with a similar article.

RESULTS

The targeted article and the contrasting article had similar research designs and objectives, but they came to completely different conclusions. The ways of calculating cervical VBQ were different between them.

CONCLUSION

We advised the targeted article's authors to try their research again in another way of calculation of cervical VBQ like the contrast article.