Transconjunctival approach in lower eyelid blepharoplasty

Complications of preseptal versus retroseptal transconjunctival approach for isolated orbital floor fracture repair: A double-blind, non-inferiority, randomized, split-face controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Effective surgical access to the orbital floor facilitates surgery and mitigates postoperative complications (PC). The aim of this study was to compare PC between the preseptal and retroseptal transconjunctival approaches (PS-TCA/RS-TCA) for isolated orbital floor fracture (OFF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a double-blind, non-inferiority, randomized, split-face study design, patients aged ≥ 18 years with bilateral isolated OFF were enrolled. A sample size of 177 eyes per group was determined through power analysis. The primary predictor variable was the surgical approach, and the main outcome was the PC rate at month 6. Statistical analyses were computed with a significance level at 0.05 and the non-inferiority margin at a relative risk (RR) of 0.045.

RESULTS

The final sample included 193 patients (23.3 % female; age, 42.8 ± 18.1 years). Both TCA variants exhibited comparable PC rates (5.2 % for PS-TCA vs. 7.3 % for RS-TCA; P = 0.53; absolute risk, +2.07 % [95 % CI, -2.74 % to 6.89 %]; RR, 1.4 [95 % CI, 0.64 to 3.07]). Approximately one in every 49 patients experiencing PC with RS-TCA (number needed to harm, 48.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Both TCA methods can be used without different PC rates at 6 months postoperatively. Future research should focus on TCA in combination with other surgical approaches for multiple orbital wall reconstruction.

Orbital fat graft retroseptal transconjunctival blepharoplasty for treatment of groove in the infraorbital region

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of the retroseptal transconjunctival blepharoplasty together with tear trough ligament (TTL) and Orbicularis retaining ligament (ORL) release with orbital fat graft in the management of groove in the infraorbital region (GIR).

METHODS

A prospective study of 80 eyes of 40 patients that underwent retroseptal transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty together with TTL and ORL release and resected orbital fat grafting. An ophthalmic examination includes lower eyelid evaluation and Barton's Tear trough deformity grading was done at baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the surgery. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using Global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) and Blepharoplasty outcomes evaluation (BOE).

RESULTS

Baseline tear trough defects were graded into grade 1, 2, and 3 in 12 (15%), 39 (48.75%) and 29 (36.25%) eyes, respectively. While at 6 months follow-up, grade 0 was recorded in 63 (78.75%) eyes, and grade 1 was recorded in 17 (21.25%) eyes. The amount of fat removed was 0.52 ± 0.04 mL per eye, whereas the amount of injected fat graft was 0.24 ± 0.04. The mean operative time was 33.2 ± 4.1 min per eye. GAIS showed degree 1, 2, and 3 in 8 (20%), 29 (72.5%), and 3 (7.5%) patients at 6 months follow-up, respectively. The mean baseline BOE increased significantly from 36.5 ± 5.9 to 86.9 ± 5.5 at 6 months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our cohort highlights the beneficial effects of TTD/ORL release with resected orbital fat grafting in the management of GIR and infraorbital hollow.

An Overview of Surgical Approaches for Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty

Age-related changes in the lower eyelid are noticed by patients as bags or circles under the eye, a tired look, and a flattened face. Lower eyelid blepharoplasty, in which the excess skin and/or orbital fat is excised and repositioned, is mainly performed for aesthetic reasons rather than the correction of functional abnormalities. Favorable outcomes for the combination of these approaches have been reported, but the most suitable surgical technique is still debated. This systematic narrative review deals with the indications, preoperative considerations, operative techniques, and complications of several different surgical approaches to lower eyelid blepharoplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Does the Literature Support the Longevity of this Procedure?

BACKGROUND

Lower eyelid blepharoplasty has continued to evolve with ongoing debate regarding optimal techniques. Despite large case series publishing excellent results and minimal complications, the true longevity of these procedures remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine how thoroughly the aesthetic surgery literature assesses the longevity of lower blepharoplasty.

METHODS

A 20-year comprehensive literature review from 1997 to 2017 was conducted. The titles and abstracts of 180 articles were reviewed, yielding 86 potential publications; 49 studies met inclusion criteria and were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 10,698 patients were included for analysis. Reported follow-up ranged between 1 week and 192 months. Mean follow-up was 14.8 months for the 29 studies (59.2%) that reported these data. Pooled analysis of complication rates demonstrated 0.77% (n = 82) reoperation, 0.37% (n = 39) scleral show, 0.25% (n = 27) lid malposition, and 0.24% (n = 25) ectropion rates, among others. Forty-four studies (89.8%) published postoperative photographs with a total of 141 unique postoperative time points that were supported with photographic evidence (mean: 15.3 months; range: 1 week-192 months). In this series, for only 10 patients (0.094%) were postoperative photographs available at time points beyond 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower eyelid blepharoplasty is a powerful procedure with seemingly minimal morbidity despite its technical demands. The longevity of this procedure is poorly supported with photographic evidence in the literature. Studies do not adequately report or represent their follow-up to capture long-lasting results. Standardized reporting of results is needed to ensure that anyone seeking this treatment can be adequately counseled.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4

The Reliability of the Transconjunctival Approach for Orbital Exposure: Measurement of Positional Changes in the Lower Eyelid

Background

Lower eyelid incisions are widely used for the orbital approach in periorbital trauma and aesthetic surgery. In general, the subciliary approach is known to cause disposition of the lower eyelid by scarring the anterior lamella in some cases. On the other hand, many surgeons believe that a transconjunctival approach usually does not result in such complications and is a reliable method. We measured positional changes in the lower eyelid in blowout fracture repair since entropion is one of the most serious complications of the transconjunctival orbital approach.

Methods

To measure the positional changes in the lower eyelids, we analyzed preoperative and postoperative photographs over various time intervals. In the analysis of the photographs, marginal reflex distance 2 (MRD₂) and eyelash angle were used as an index of eyelid position. Statistical analyses were performed to identify the significance in the positional changes. All patients underwent orbital reconstruction through a transconjunctival incision by a single plastic surgeon.

Results

In 42 blowout fracture patients, there was no statistical significant difference in the MRD2 and eyelash angle. Furthermore, there were no clinical complications, such as infection, hematoma, bleeding, or implant protrusion, during the follow-up periods.

Conclusion

The advantages of the transconjunctival approach for orbital access include minimal scarring and a lower risk of eyelid displacement compared with other approaches. Based on these results, we recommend the transconjunctival approach for orbital exposure as a safe and reliable method.

Comparison of Efficacy and Complications Among Various Spacer Grafts in the Treatment of Lower Eyelid Retraction: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Lower eyelid retraction is a difficult problem to treat, but it is a prevalent condition and a common complication of blepharoplasty. The use of spacer grafts to increase eyelid height and improve symptoms has been described for a long time, but the optimal choice of spacer graft material is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The authors reviewed the currently available evidence to determine the best available spacer graft material in terms of efficacy and complications.

METHODS

A systematic review of all available literature published between 1985 and the present was performed using the Pubmed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane library databases. Inclusion criteria were that the studies contain original content assessing the treatment of lower eyelid retraction in humans using a spacer graft and provide quantitative outcomes data.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve articles were reviewed following an initial screen using titles, and 19 articles were chosen for inclusion in this systematic review. Analysis of these articles revealed no spacer graft material that is clearly superior to others.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to a lack of high quality evidence, this review did not reveal one spacer graft material that is clearly superior to others. However, a narrative summary of the available evidence reveals unique sets of advantages and disadvantages associated with the various materials currently available. Further research in the form of well-designed studies will be necessary to further clarify advantages of certain spacer graft materials over others.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

Overview of Facial Plastic Surgery and Current Developments

Facial plastic surgery is a multidisciplinary specialty largely driven by otolaryngology but includes oral maxillary surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, and plastic surgery. It encompasses both reconstructive and cosmetic components. The scope of practice for facial plastic surgeons in the United States may include rhinoplasty, browlifts, blepharoplasty, facelifts, microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck, craniomaxillofacial trauma reconstruction, and correction of defects in the face after skin cancer resection. Facial plastic surgery also encompasses the use of injectable fillers, neural modulators (e.g., BOTOX Cosmetic, Allergan Pharmaceuticals, Westport, Ireland), lasers, and other devices aimed at rejuvenating skin. Facial plastic surgery is a constantly evolving field with continuing innovative advances in surgical techniques and cosmetic adjunctive technologies. This article aims to give an overview of the various procedures that encompass the field of facial plastic surgery and to highlight the recent advances and trends in procedures and surgical techniques.