Modalities of Post-Rhinoplasty Edema and Ecchymosis Measurement: A Systematic Review

The Effectiveness of Bromelain on Oedema, Subconjunctival Haemorrhage, and Ecchymosis After Rhinoplasty: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of bromelain on periorbital oedema, subconjunctival haemorrhage, and ecchymosis after preservation rhinoplasty.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial SETTING: Tertiary referral centre METHODS: In this double-blind clinical trial, participants aged 18-45 who were scheduled for open preservation rhinoplasty using the push-down technique and lateral osteotomy were recruited. Twenty-three cases were assigned to the placebo group and twenty-three to the experimental group Bromelain.

RESULTS

Regarding gender, 17.39% (8 cases) were male, and 82.61% (38 cases) were female. Comparing the severity of left and right eye ecchymosis between groups at different times showed that bromelain was significantly effective on both sides on the 7th day (p = 0.012). Like ecchymosis, the results demonstrated that bromelain was also considerably effective on subconjunctival haemorrhage on the seventh day post-operatively (p = 0.015). However, the intensity of oedema between groups at different times did not significantly differ.

CONCLUSION

Bromelain increases serum fibrinolytic activity and decreases plasma fibrinogen levels. It is significantly more effective on subconjunctival haemorrhage and ecchymosis compared with the placebo on the seventh day in both eyes after rhinoplasty. Hence, this study indicates that bromelain is remarkably more effective than a placebo in reducing subconjunctival haemorrhage and ecchymosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials ID: IRCT20180519039720N2 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Tranexamic Acid and Rhinoplasty: How Do Different Administration Routes Affect Effectiveness?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the intravenous, oral and local application of tranexamic acid in operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative edema and ecchymosis in rhinoplasty.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blinded, prospective study. We included 146 patients who underwent rhinoplasty at the Bezmialem Vakif University Medical Faculty Otorhinolaryngology Clinic between April 2021 and April 2022. The patients were divided into four groups: Group 1 (intravenous TXA), Group 2 (oral TXA), Group 3 (topical TXA), and Group 4 (control). Operation time was recorded. Bleeding volume was measured in the suction chamber and nasopharyngeal pack. Postoperative edema and ecchymosis were evaluated using a scale at the end of the operation, on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th days.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of mean operation time (p = 0.894). There was a statistically significant lower mean intraoperative bleeding level in Group 2 from the other groups (p = 0.020). Group 3 had significantly lower scores for postoperative edema than the other groups at the end of the operation, on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th days (p < 0.05), and significantly lower scores for postoperative ecchymosis at the end of the operation (p = 0.013) and on the 3rd day (p = 0.024). Although group 3 had a lower score than the other groups in the ecchymosis measurements on the 1st, and 7th days, no statistically significant results were obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

Local application of tranexamic acid is founded more beneficial for reducing postoperative edema and ecchymosis in rhinoplasty than intravenous and/or oral applications in this study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Assessment of Harms Reporting Quality in Randomized Controlled Trials of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

Background

Rhinoplasty is one of the most common aesthetic plastic surgery procedures. Complications can lead to both aesthetic and functional impairments. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Harms statement was developed to promote improved reporting of harm across randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Objectives

The aim of this systematic review is to assess harms reporting quality across RCTs on aesthetic rhinoplasty.

Methods

A literature search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases (January 1, 2005 to August 4, 2023). RCTs which compared 2 or more interventions in rhinoplasty with primarily aesthetic indications and assessed patient-important outcomes were included. The reporting quality was assessed by following a 40-item checklist endorsed by the 2022 CONSORT Harms Extension update.

Results

A total of 58 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen RCTs addressed harms of treatment in some capacity. Overall, the reporting quality across RCTs was poor, with a median CONSORT Harms score of 33% (range, 16%-83%). A reporting adherence of ≥50% was met by only 8 studies. There was no significant difference in reporting adherence between studies based on journal endorsement of CONSORT or industry vs nonindustry funding sources (P > .05). A high journal impact factor was significantly associated with a higher reporting quality (P = .044).

Conclusions

CONSORT Harms reporting adherence was poor across the majority of included RCTs. Future trials on aesthetic rhinoplasty should aim to follow the reporting recommendations endorsed by the CONSORT Harms statement to increase transparency and minimize heterogeneity in harms reporting across studies.

Level of Evidence 1

Periorbital Ecchymosis Post Closed Rhinoplasty: Natural History, Risk Factors, and Validation of a New Scoring System

Postrhinoplasty periorbital ecchymosis is an inevitable side effect contributing to patients' psychological aspect and early postoperative morbidity. Efforts are constantly being made to reduce ecchymosis using different methods with varying success. To evaluate treatment response, it is mandatory to have a reliable score. Several studies suggest other scoring systems, but none has been postrhinoplasty-specific, validated, and accepted. This study aimed to demonstrate the natural history of postrhinoplasty ecchymosis, find potential risk factors for worsening patterns, and suggest a useful and reliable periorbital ecchymosis scoring system for postrhinoplasty follow-up.

Methods

This prospective study included 183 patients who underwent closed rhinoplasty by the same surgeon and the same principle method. Photographs of the periorbital ecchymosis were taken on postoperative days 1, 2, and 7. The periorbital area was divided into quarters, and three independent physicians assigned the dominant color of each quarter.

Results

There were no significant variations between the three physicians' scoring. The interobserver consistency defined as an excellent scoring system reliability, according to our statistical analysis. The postoperative ecchymosis demonstrated a consistent pattern of spread over time, dominating the medial quarters on early postoperative days 1 and 2, following into the lower lateral quarters in postoperative day 7. We found no correlation between patient demographics and clinical characteristics to ecchymosis patterns and temporal spread.

Conclusions

Our study suggests a reliable and easy-to-use postrhinoplasty ecchymosis scoring system. This scoring method can be used for postrhinoplasty ecchymosis assessment and as a research-validated tool to quantify different perioperative treatments to reduce ecchymosis and estimate mid-face trauma.

Skin Contour Sutures in Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

The skin-soft tissue envelope (STE) is a critical component of rhinoplasty and can have a significant impact on the final result. Skin contour sutures (SCSs) can be used to prevent potential complications related to skin detachment and to improve rhinoplasty results.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of SCSs for nasal skin approximation.

METHODS

SCSs involve the use of external sutures to stabilize the STE flap based on the principle that the pressure of the sutures helps to approximate the STE to the underlying nasal skeleton. The first study group demonstrated the utilization of SCSs in 459 consecutive rhinoplasty cases between December 2016 and April 2022 which were retrospectively reviewed. The second study group consisted of 30 patients with thick skin who had insertion of SCSs with ultrasonic evaluation both preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

The average postoperative follow-up period in the first study group was 41 months (range, 12-64 months). Any suture site that was visible after removal of the suture disappeared completely after 6 weeks in most patients. No complications were reported. In the second group the ultrasound data indicated that STE healing was faster as its thickness returns to its preoperative state earlier in the healing process when SCSs were used.

CONCLUSIONS

SCSs appear to help to decrease severe nasal edema, hematomas, loss of tip definition, fibrosis, and pollybeak deformity, thereby improving the results and predictability of rhinoplasty surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Prevalence of complicated surgical wounds and related factors among adults hospitalized in public hospitals

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of complicated surgical wounds and its related factors in hospitalized adults.

METHOD

In this cross-sectional study, information from 251 patients hospitalized in seven public hospitals in Manaus, Brazil, and at risk of suffering surgical site complications after undergoing surgery was analyzed. Data were collected via interviews, physical examinations, and a medical record review from March to June 2015. Prevalence rate was estimated as the ratio between individuals with complications and patients at risk. To explore associated variables, individuals with and without complications were compared via 5% significant logistic regression and bivariate analyses. This study was approved by a research ethics committee.

RESULTS

Overall, 15 patients (6%) showed complicated surgical wounds. General hospitalization (p < 0.003), presence of ecchymosis, (p < 0.001), and men (p = 0.047) increased patients' probability of developing complications in 13.9, 10.1, and 8.2 times, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Assessing the prevalence of complicated surgical wounds and its associated factors in adults contributes to their epidemiological understanding, highlighting prevention targets and making data available for scientific comparisons.

Prevalência de ferida operatória complicada e fatores associados em adultos internados em hospitais públicos

RESUMO Objetivo: Estimar a prevalência de Ferida Operatória Complicada e seus fatores associados, em adultos hospitalizados. Método: Estudo transversal, aprovado por comitê de ética. Foram analisadas informações de 251 pacientes submetidos à cirurgia e com risco de complicação do sítio cirúrgico, internados em sete hospitais públicos em Manaus (Brasil); cujos dados foram coletados por meio de entrevista, exame físico e revisão de prontuários, no período de março a junho de 2015. A taxa de prevalência foi calculada como a razão entre os indivíduos com complicação e os pacientes em risco. Para exploração de variáveis associadas, foram comparados indivíduos com e sem complicação por meio de análises bivariadas e regressão logística, com significância de 5%. Resultados: 15 pacientes (6%) apresentaram ferida operatória complicada. A presença de equimose (p < 0,001), ajustada pelo sexo masculino (p = 0,047) e a internação na clínica geral (p < 0,003) aumentaram a probabilidade de desenvolver a complicação em 10,1; 8,2 e 13,9 vezes, respectivamente. Conclusão A identificação da prevalência da ferida operatória complicada em adultos e seus fatores associados contribuem para a sua compreensão epidemiológica, destacando alvos de prevenção e disponibilizando dados para comparação científica.