The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Reconstruction: A Canadian Perspective

Current Practices and Trends of Plastic and Oncoplastic Breast Surgeons in Canada

Background: There is a lack of previous studies investigating oncoplastic practice trends for breast reconstruction in Canada, particularly from the plastic surgeon perspective. Given the rising popularity of oncoplastic techniques, this study aimed to identify current practice trends for breast and plastic surgeons in Canada. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study of breast and plastic surgeons performing oncoplastic surgery across Canada was conducted. Results: Ninety-five surgeons were invited to complete the survey, with 58 respondents (response rate 61%), of which 29 (50.0%) were breast surgeons and 29 (50.0%) were plastic surgeons. Compared to plastic surgeons, breast surgeons performed significantly more level 1 surgeries (27.6 vs 3.45%, P < .001). Plastic surgeons performed more level 2 (37.9% vs 13.8%, P = .0475) and level 3 (31.4% vs 10.3%, P = .00814) surgeries. Breast surgeons identified significant perceived barriers including unfamiliarity with techniques (P = .00513), adjuvant therapy delays (P = .00612), lack of plastic surgery support (P < .001), lack of radiation oncology support (P = .0485), increased OR time (P < .001), lack of OHIP billing codes (P < .001), and post-operative complication management (P = .0372). Breast surgeon comfort with oncoplastic techniques was not correlated with practice duration (R-square = .037, P-value = .853). Breast surgeon comfort with contralateral surgery was not correlated with practice setting (R-square = .071, P-value = .632). Conclusions: Breast surgeons perceive a lack of training, a lack of support from plastic surgery, concerns regarding appropriate financial remuneration, and worries of increased OR time as barriers in oncoplastic surgery. Collaboration between general breast surgery and plastic surgery is needed for improving training options for oncoplastic surgery in Canada and for providing excellent breast cancer care overall.

Enhancing Post-Mastectomy Care: Telehealth's Impact on Breast Reconstruction Accessibility for Breast Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVE

To examine how the recent sharp rise in telemedicine has impacted trends in accessibility of breast reconstruction (BR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study reviewed patients who underwent a total mastectomy at our institution from 1 August 2016 to 31 January 2022. By comparing cohorts before and during the widespread implementation of telemedicine, we assessed telehealth's impact on healthcare accessibility, measured by distance from patients' residences to our institution.

RESULTS

A total of 359 patients were included in this study. Of those, 176 received total mastectomy prior to the availability of telemedicine, and 183 in the subsequent period. There were similar baseline characteristics among patients undergoing mastectomy, including distance from place of residence to hospital (p = 0.67). The same proportion elected to receive BR between groups (p = 0.22). Those declining BR traveled similar distances as those electing the procedure, both before the era of widespread telemedicine adoption (40.3 and 35.6 miles, p = 0.56) and during the height of telemedicine use (22.3 and 61.3 miles, p = 0.26). When tracking follow-up care, significantly more patients during the pandemic pursued at least one follow-up visit with their original surgical team, indicative of the increased utilization of telehealth services.

CONCLUSIONS

While the rate of BR remained unchanged during the pandemic, our findings reveal significant shifts in healthcare utilization, highly attributed to the surge in telehealth adoption. This suggests a transformative impact on breast cancer care, emphasizing the need for continued exploration of telemedicine's role in enhancing accessibility and patient follow-up in the post-pandemic era.

Acceptance of outpatient enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS©) protocols for implant-based breast reconstruction nudged on by the COVID-19 pandemic

We retrospectively identified 295 women undergoing outpatient implant breast reconstruction (IBR) who received standardized ERAS care pre-pandemic (PP; April 2018-March 2020) and during the pandemic (DP; April 2020-March 2022). The majority of IBR was completed as outpatient surgeries DP versus PP (73% versus 38%, p < 0.001). Immediate IBR increased DP versus PP (p < 0.001). Preoperative ERAS© order sets were used 54% of the time. Lack of ERAS© order set use was associated with unplanned admissions (55.3% versus 44.7%, p = 0.02). COVID-19 changed health care and nudged IBR to outpatient procedures. With ERAS© recommendations, IBR can be safely and effectively transitioned to outpatient settings.

Safety analysis of immediate breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap in the post-COVID-19 era: a comparison between pre- and post-pandemic cohorts

Background

The demand for immediate breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is recovering as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transitions from a pandemic to an endemic. This study sought to evaluate the safety of resuming DIEP flap reconstruction in the post-COVID-19 era.

Methods

Consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap at the Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital were retrospectively included in the study. The patients were divided into a post-pandemic group (Group A) and a pre-pandemic group (Group B). The clinicopathological factors, surgical procedures, and rates of post-operative complications were compared between the two groups using the Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-squared test.

Results

A total of 167 patients were included in the study, of whom 119 (71.3%) were in Group A and 48 (28.7%) were in Group B. The two groups had similar clinicopathological features, including age (P=0.988), body mass index (P=0.504), and tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage (P=0.932). The Group A patients were more likely to receive single perforator DIEP flap transplantation than the Group B patients (n=28, 22.8% vs. n=3, 5.8%, P=0.007). There was a numerical decrease in the mean operating time of Group A patients compared to Group B patients (9.82 vs. 10.12 hours, P=0.172). The mean length of stay after the surgery was significantly shorter after the pandemic than before the pandemic (11.2 vs. 14.3 days, P<0.001). The complication rates between the two groups were similar.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence that resuming DIEP reconstruction is safe in the post-COVID-19 era.

Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Immediate Breast Reconstruction Access

AIMS

As a result of COVID-19, there have been restrictions on surgical interventions across Canada. Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), while an essential component of cancer care, is classified as elective surgery and therefore has been restricted in access over the course of the pandemic. The purpose of this study was to compare wait times for breast cancer patients undergoing surgical intervention for IBR before and since the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of consecutive patients who underwent IBR between July 2018 and October 2021 by 5 plastic surgeons at a single Canadian health center. Wait times to consultation and surgical intervention between pre- and post-COVID cohorts were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients met inclusion criteria. For ablative surgery, there was no difference in wait times to surgical oncology consultation (14.0 ± 12.3 vs 14.0 ± 11.0 days, P = 0.991) and surgical intervention with IBR (41.0 ± 49.8 vs 35.0 ± 58.0 days, P = 0.621) between the pre- and post-COVID cohorts. For breast reconstruction, while time to consultation with plastic surgery (12.5 ± 14.8 vs 11.0 ± 12.8 days, P = 0.775) remained unchanged, usage of autologous techniques was reduced [n = 13 (16%) vs n = 2 (2%), P = 0.006], and time to second-stage alloplastic reconstruction increased (230 ± 102 vs 325 ± 224 days, P = 0.044) post-COVID.

CONCLUSIONS

Swift adoption of evidence driven protocols has resulted in comparable wait times for breast cancer ablative procedures. However, utilization of autologous techniques and wait times to second-stage reconstructions have increased.

Breast Cancer Management in the Era of Covid-19; Key Issues, Contemporary Strategies, and Future Implications

During the COVID-19 pandemic, several priority diseases were not getting sufficient attention. Whilst breast cancer is a fatal disease affecting millions worldwide, identification and management of these patients did not initially attract critical attention to minimize the impact of lockdown, post-lockdown, and other measures. Breast cancer patients' conditions may not remain stable without proper care, worsening their prognosis. Proper care includes the timely instigation of surgery, systemic therapy, and psychological support. This includes low-and middle-income countries where there are already concerns with available personnel and medicines to adequately identify and treat these patients. Consequently, there was a need to summarize the current scenario regarding managing breast cancer care during COVID-19 across all countries, including any guidelines developed. We systematically searched three scientific databases and found 76 eligible articles covering the medical strategies of high-income countries versus LMICs. Typically, diagnostic facilities in hospitals were affected at the beginning of the pandemic following the lockdown and other measures. This resulted in more advanced-stage cancers being detected at initial presentation across countries, negatively impacting patient outcomes. Other than increased telemedicine, instigating neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy more often, reducing non-essential visits, and increasing the application of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy to meet the challenges, encouragingly, there was no other significant difference among patients in high-income versus LMICs. Numerous guidelines regarding patient management evolved during the pandemic to address the challenges posed by lockdowns and other measures, which were subsequently adopted by various high-income countries and LMICs to improve patient care. The psychological impact of COVID-19 and associated lockdown measures, especially during the peak of COVID-19 waves, and the subsequent effect on the patient's mental health must also be considered in this high-priority group. We will continue to monitor the situation to provide direction in future pandemics.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on alloplastic breast reconstruction: An analysis of national outcomes

Background

Immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction shifted to the outpatient setting during the COVID‐19 pandemic to conserve inpatient hospital beds while providing timely oncologic care. We examine the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for trends in and safety of outpatient breast reconstruction during the pandemic.

Methods

NSQIP data were filtered for immediate alloplastic breast reconstructions between April and December of 2019 (before‐COVID) and 2020 (during‐COVID); the proportion of outpatient procedures was compared. Thirty‐day complications were compared for noninferiority between propensity‐matched outpatients and inpatients utilizing a 1% risk difference margin.

Results

During COVID, immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction cases decreased (4083 vs. 4677) and were more frequently outpatient (31% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). Outpatients had lower rates of smoking (6.8% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.03) and obesity (26% vs. 33%, p < 0.001). Surgical complication rates of outpatient procedures were noninferior to propensity‐matched inpatients (5.0% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.03 noninferiority). Reoperation rates were lower in propensity‐matched outpatients (5.2% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.003).

Conclusion

Immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction shifted towards outpatient procedures during the COVID‐19 pandemic with noninferior complication rates. Therefore, a paradigm shift towards outpatient reconstruction for certain patients may be safe. However, decreased reoperations in outpatients may represent undiagnosed complications and warrant further investigation.

Canadian Expert Opinion on Breast Reconstruction Access: Strategies to Optimize Care during COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstructive services are medically necessary, time-sensitive procedures with meaningful health-related quality of life benefits for breast cancer survivors. The COVID-19 global pandemic has resulted in unprecedented restrictions in surgical access, including access to breast reconstructive services. A national approach is needed to guide the strategic use of resources during times of fluctuating restrictions on surgical access due to COVID-19 demands on hospital capacity.

METHODS

A national team of experts were convened for critical review of healthcare needs and development of recommendations and strategies for patients seeking breast reconstruction during the pandemic. Following critical review of literature, expert discussion by teleconference meetings, and evidenced-based consensus, best practice recommendations were developed to guide national provision of breast reconstructive services.

RESULTS

Recommendations include strategic use of multidisciplinary teams for patient selection and triage with centralized coordinated use of alternate treatment plans during times of resource restrictions. With shared decision-making, patient-centered shifting and consolidation of resources facilitate efficient allocation. Targeted application of perioperative management strategies and surgical treatment plans maximize the provision of breast reconstructive services.

CONCLUSIONS

A unified national approach to strategically reorganize healthcare delivery is feasible to uphold standards of patient-centered care for patients interested in breast reconstruction.