Differences in patient-reported outcomes between medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty

Comparison of joint awareness after total knee arthroplasty, medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, and high tibial osteotomy: a retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the Forgotten Joint Score-12(FJS) outcomes and the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of the FJS after high tibial osteotomy (HTO), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with short-term follow-up (at least 2 years). Another objective of the study is to investigate the factors influencing FJS. It is hypothesized that there are differences in FJS outcomes among the three procedures.

METHODS

Patients who underwent HTO, UKA, and TKA from January 2016 to December 2020 and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years were included in the study. The FJS were analyses from a cohort of people who submitted data to two years. The preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes were compared and evaluated the patient-related factor. The FJS scores were predicted using multiple linear regression analysis. Additionally, Patient's Joint Perception (PJP) questions were used as anchors to determine the achievement of the forgotten joint, and FJS MCID were calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-nine patients were included in the final study, and there were 111 patients in HTO groups,128patients in UKA groups, and 150 patients in TKA groups. The mean follow-up was 47.0 months. There was a significant difference in the total FJS, between the HTO, UKA, and TKA groups (FJS:59.38 ± 7.25, 66.69 ± 7.44 and 56.90 ± 6.85, p < 0.001. We found the MCID of the FJS of HTO, UKA, and TKA were 63.54, 69.79, and 61.45, respectively. In multiple linear regression, younger age, and higher FS were significant predictors of better FJS.

CONCLUSION

Medial UKA demonstrated lower patient awareness in comparison to HTO and TKA, as assessed by the FJS. Younger age and higher FS were identified as significant predictors of improved FJS, providing valuable guidance for surgical decision-making.

Decision regret following opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: Older age as a risk factor

BACKGROUND

Understanding risk factors that can predict decision regret after surgical procedures can potentially increase the quality of patient decision making and reduce decision regret after opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). The purpose of the present study was to identify the risk factors that predict the likelihood of decision regret after OWHTO.

METHOD

Questionnaires were administered to 98 eligible OWHTO recipients more than one year post-operatively. They answered "Yes" or "No" to the question "Would you go for the same choice (OWHTO) if you had to do it over again?" Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted using the decision regret questionnaire as the dependent variable against patient characteristics and surgery related factors. A receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve were constructed and calculated for age at surgery. Cut-off values were determined using the Youden principle and receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Among the 98 respondents, 18 (18%) reported regretting their decision. Older age at surgery was the only predictive risk factor for decision regret (P < 0.01). The area under the curve for the model using age to predict failure was 0.722. The cut-off value was 71 years. Patients aged 71 years or more had a 7.841 odds ratio for decision regret (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Older age emerged as a predictive risk factor for decision regret after OWHTO. Patients aged 71 years or older had a higher decision regret rate after OWHTO than younger patients and should more carefully weigh the suitability of OWHTO against other options.

Effect of medial opening wedge distal tibial tuberosity osteotomy on possible neuropathic pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of literature regarding the changes and features of neuropathic pain (NP) in knee osteoarthritis (OA) following medial opening wedge distal tibial tuberosity osteotomy (OWDTO). This study aimed to investigate the effect of OWDTO on NP in knee OA; we hypothesized that OWDTO improves knee symptoms and functions and also meets patient satisfaction in those with knee OA with possible NP or without NP.

METHODS

Fifty-two consecutive patients who underwent OWDTO were categorized into the unlikely NP and possible NP groups using the painDETECT questionnaire. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score and the Knee Society Score 2011 (KSS 2011) were compared between the groups preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The number of patients having possible NP significantly decreased from 12 (23.1%) preoperatively to one (1.9%) postoperatively (p < 0.001). The patient with postoperative possible NP also had possible NP preoperatively. All preoperative sub-scores of WOMAC were significantly higher in the possible NP group than in the unlikely NP group (p = 0.018, 0.013, 0.004, and 0.005, respectively); however, the postoperative scores did not differ between the two groups. Regarding the KSS 2011, the preoperative scores for symptom and functional activities were significantly lower in the possible NP group than in the unlikely NP group (p = 0.031 and 0.024, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

OWDTO is an effective surgery for patients with possible NP; it improves symptoms and knee function as well as meets patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

What is the difference in proprioception between single condylar arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy? a comparative study on both knees of the same patient

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and outcomes of different surgical procedures, namely unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO), for the treatment of bilateral medial compartment knee osteoarthritis in the same patient. The joint awareness and function of these two surgical methods were evaluated.

METHODS

A total of 15 patients with bilateral medial compartment knee osteoarthritis who underwent either UKA or HTO between 2012 and 2020 were included in the study. Patient data, including age, gender, body mass index and length of hospital stay, were collected. Pre- and post-operative measurements were conducted, including tibiofemoral angle, tibial plateau posterior inclination angle, proximal tibial medial angle, distance from mechanical axis to knee joint center, hip-knee-ankle angle, pre- and post-operative knee joint scores, knee joint range of motion, and FIS-12 scores at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The latest follow-up was used for evaluating the outcomes of osteoarthritis treatment. Normality of continuous variables was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Between-group comparisons were performed using the paired sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Repeated measures analysis of variance was utilized to analyze FJS-12 measurements at different time points, and the correlation between FJS-12 and postoperative clinical results was examined using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed in FJS between the UKA and HTO groups at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, but no significant difference was found at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. FJS in the UKA group demonstrated a significant increase from 3 to 6 months postoperatively, but no significant difference was observed from 6 to 24 months postoperatively. In contrast, FJS in the HTO group showed a significant increase from 3 to 24 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent UKA exhibited superior joint awareness compared to those who underwent HTO during the early postoperative period. Furthermore, the rate of joint awareness in UKA patients was faster than in HTO patients.

Similar short-term KOOS between open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty in patients over age 60: A propensity score-matched cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate improvement in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in comparison with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in cohorts over age 60 matched by pre-operative age, gender, body mass index (BMI), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), KOOS sub-scores, and osteoarthritis (OA) grade.

METHODS

Propensity score matching was performed between 162 HTO patients and 134 TKA patients. When calculating the propensity score by multivariate logistic regression analysis, the following pre-operative confounders were included: age, gender, BMI, HKAA, KOOS sub-scores, and OA grade. Consequently, a total of 55 patients were included in each group. The Student's t-test was used to analyse differences in the post-operative KOOS sub-scores between groups.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, all matched pre-operative valuables were identical, with no significant differences between the HTO and TKA groups. None of the post-operative KOOS sub-scores at 1 year after surgery showed a significant difference between the HTO and TKA groups. Both groups demonstrated significant and comparable post-operative improvement in every KOOS sub-score.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients over age 60, there was no significant difference in short-term pain relief and improvements in activity and quality of life between HTO and TKA after propensity score matching including pre-operative age, KOOS sub-scores, and OA grade. HTO is a joint preservation procedure that is valid for knee OA even in individuals over age 60.

The results of allogenic cancellous bone graft in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

PURPOSE

There is no clear consensus regarding the optimal filling agent in the medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). In this study, we evaluated the clinical and radiologic outcomes of MOWHTO with an allogeneic cancellous bone graft and TomoFix plate.

METHODS

Medical profiles of 122 patients who underwent MOWHTO with cancellous bone graft from iliac crest were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred and two patients (120 knees) who met the study criteria were included in the analysis. The osteotomy site was fixed with a TomoFix plate. The mean age of the patients was 40.85 ± 22.15 years. The mean follow-up of the patients was 33.2 ± 29 months. The primary outcome measures were the union of osteotomy site and loss of correction that were investigated on postoperative radiographs. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative complications that were extracted from the patients' medical records.

RESULTS

Union of the osteotomy site was observed in all patients within three months after the operation. Loss of correction at the osteotomy site occurred in two knees (1.7%), both of which underwent revision surgery. Three patients had non-infected prolonged wound drainage and underwent reoperation for allograft removal. Nine other complications were also recorded that did not require intervention, including superficial infection (n = 2), compartment syndrome (n = 1), deep vein thrombosis (n = 1), loss of knee flexion (n = 2), and transient pain at the site of the osteotomy (n = 3).

CONCLUSION

Allogenic cancellous bone graft provides efficient gap healing in MOWHTO and can be used as an effective alternative to the autogenous bone graft.

The best position of bone grafts in the medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The application of wedge-shaped bone grafts can increase the biomechanical stability of knee during the medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) by reducing the von Mises stress of the medial plate and lateral cortical hinge area. However, the optimal position of bone grafts it remains unclear, so we aimed to determine search for the optimal position of the bone grafts in MOWHTO by using finite element analysis.

METHODS

In the finite element analysis, MOWHTO models were established with three different osteotomy distraction heights and assembled into four groups according to different conditions, including the no bone grafts (NBG) group, the anterior bone grafts (ABG) group, the middle bone grafts (MBG) group, and the posterior bone grafts (PBG) group. Based on previous studies, 600 N and 1800 N loads were applied to the knee joint to simulate the static forces during a double and single leg stance to measure the von Mises stress of the medial implant area and lateral hinge area, the maximum displacement of different models, the relative displacement of the osteotomy area and the stress distribution in the bone grafts.

RESULTS

Compared to the NBG and ABG groups, the stress of the lateral cortical hinge area and the medial implate area was significantly lower in the PBG group. For example, under the 600N force load, when the height of the osteotomy area was 10 mm, 15 mm, and 20 mm, the maximum von Mises stress of the medial implate area and lateral cortical hinge area in the NBG group were 140, 141, 172, and 53, 57, 60 MPa, respectively. Compared with the NBG group, the maximum von Mises stress of the medial implate area and lateral cortical hinge area in the PBG group were reduced by 45%, 56%, 63% and 14%, 39%, 68% at distraction height of 10 mm, 15 mm, and 20 mm, respectively. The bone grafts in the posterior parts provide the best stability,with the stress of the middle and posterior bone grafts are mainly concentrated in the edge.

CONCLUSIONS

The posterior part of the osteotomy area is the best position for bone graft placement since it provides optimal stability and reduces von Mises stress in the medial plate and lateral cortex hinge area, with the stress of the posterior bone grafts mainly concentrated in the edge. These findings guide bone graft placement sites in clinical surgery and are a basis for future research on bone graft materials and structures in MOWHTO.

Comparison of joint awareness after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy: a retrospective multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) are established treatments for medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) or osteonecrosis (ON) of the knee joint, and the predominance of either procedure is inconclusive. We compared the awareness of the knee after UKA and HTO using the Forgotten joint score-12 (FJS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, multicenter study. Ninety-six knees of 90 patients who received UKA or HTO and were followed-up for at least 1 year were analyzed. Postoperative FJS was compared between the two groups and evaluated for the effect of patient-related factors and clinical outcomes. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to predict FJS.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the FJS between the UKA and HTO groups (p = 0.24). FJS did not correlate with any of the patient-related factors. There was a correlation between the FJS and each item of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (LKS). In multiple linear regression analysis, lower BMI, the diagnosis of OA Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade ≥ 3, and ON were significant predictors of better FJS. In both groups, FJS was correlated with each item of the KOOS and LKS. Internal consistency in terms of Cronbach's alpha was excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in FJS between patients who underwent UKA and HTO. Lower BMI, the diagnosis of OA KL grade ≥ 3, and ON were significant predictors of better FJS.

Medial Opening Wedge Proximal Tibial Osteotomy: Lessons Learned from a Series of 175 Consecutive Cases

INTRODUCTION

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a surgical procedure aimed at inhibiting the progression of osteoarthritis of the knee joint. The aim of this study was to identify factors influencing the functional outcome after opening wedge valgus HTO.

METHODS

A total of 175 cases (155 patients) of varus-correcting high tibial open-wedge osteotomies using the Tomofix plate were reviewed retrospectively. Patients answered the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire and 4 survey follow-up questions.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 76 of the 155 patients studied (84 of the 175 knees) completed the KOOS questionnaire, on average 3.1 years (SD 1.8 years) after the surgery. The median scores (with median absolute deviations [MAD]) for the KOOS pain, symptoms, daily activities, sports, and quality of life sections were, respectively, 76.4 (MAD 12.5), 75.0 (MAD 14.3), 85.3 (MAD 11.8), 50.0 (MAD 25.0), and 59.4 (MAD 21.9). No cases of nonunion were observed throughout the length of the study. Identified predictors of worse outcomes were higher weight and body mass index, limited knee flexion, genu varum and tibial varus of small magnitude, active smoking status at the time of surgery, further surgery for plate removal, and some grades of chondropathy in the patellofemoral, medial tibial, and femoral compartments. Patient gender, joint obliquity and over- or undercorrection were not associated with any of the outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study shows good results following valgus HTO that are comparable to outcomes following total knee arthroplasty, reinforcing the option of HTO as a valid alternative for total knee arthroplasty.

Longer Term Outcomes Following High Tibial Osteotomy for Osteoarthritis: A Prospective, Multi-Centre Observational Study Comparing Tomofix and OPTY-LINE Devices

PURPOSE

Assessing surgical accuracy and patient-recorded outcome measures for patients fitted with either the OPTY-LINE intramedullary realignment system or the Tomofix plate for medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two matched case series of patients with symptomatic medial compartment osteoarthritis without other significant knee pathology. One group comprised of 19 patients receiving the Tomofix plate, whereas another comprised of 12 patients receiving the OPTY-LINE intramedullary nail. Patella-centred long leg alignment radiographs were assessed to calculate surgical accuracy in all cases. Patients completed knee injury osteoarthritis outcome scores (KOOS) and osteotomy surgery patient satisfaction questionnaires pre-operatively and at 24 months post-surgery.

RESULTS

Absolute surgical accuracy at 2 years post-surgery was a mean 4.2 [standard deviation 3.7] for OPTY-LINE versus 9.2 [SD 7.8] for Tomofix (p = 0.11, Mann-Whitney U test). On average, patients in either the OPTY-LINE or Tomofix cohort reported at least a minimal perceptible clinical improvement-minimum average improvement of 15-for all five KOOS themes. No significant difference in change of KOOS scores over time or patient satisfaction levels were observed between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The OPTY-LINE device for HTO performs to a similar level as the Tomofix device. Surgical accuracy data are promising for OPTY-LINE, but does not seem to readily translate into difference in patient-reported outcomes compared to Tomofix. Even longer follow-up periods, to measure survival rates, and true randomised trials on larger samples can elucidate if there is a benefit for using one device over the other.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Superior to Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Terms of Pain Relief for Patients With Osteoarthritis

Background

Globally, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is widely performed on patients with osteoarthritis. Meanwhile, open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) has garnered attention in our country as a joint-preserving procedure. This study aimed to retrospectively compare the postoperative clinical outcomes of TKA and OWHTO for patients with osteoarthritis.

Methods

We selected 94 patients (106 knees) who underwent OWHTO or TKA between 2013 and 2018, had complete clinical data, and were followed up for >2 years. Patients were classified into 2 groups depending on the procedure (TKA: n = 49; OWHTO: n = 45). Patients in the A (= arthroplasty) group were significantly older, with a worse range of motion (ROM) than those in the O (osteotomy) group. There were no significant differences regarding sex and body mass index between groups. Operative time, perioperative blood loss, knee ROM, and Japanese Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (J-KOOS) were compared between the groups.

Results

Significant differences were found between the A and O groups regarding operative time (120 ± 27.2 vs 80.3 ± 23.3 minutes), perioperative blood loss (505.4 ± 271.8 vs 322.6 ± 196.1 mL), knee ROM (flexion; 123.4 ± 16.3° vs 133.7 ± 12.8°), and J-KOOS for pain (87.4 ± 12.5 vs 78.1 ± 15.2 points) and symptoms (86.6 ± 12.3 vs 79.1 ± 13.3 points). There were no significant differences regarding other J-KOOS subscales.

Conclusions

OWHTO involved shorter operative times and less blood loss. However, the O group reported less pain relief. The A group represents an older, likely less active patient population. Therefore, OWHTO is a possible joint-preserving treatment options in younger active patients who may not be interested in arthroplasty.