Revision Surgery After Cartilage Repair: Data From the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU)

[The first decade of the DGOU's cartilage register-insights for clinical practice]

BACKGROUND

Registry data provide valuable epidemiological insights that help to further improve process and outcome quality in patient care. The German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) was established in 2013 as an instrument for quality assurance after surgical cartilage regenerative procedures on hip, knee and ankle joints.

DATA COLLECTION

Participation in the German Cartilage Registry is optional for hospitals and practices. Currently, more than 160 institutions in Germany, Austria and Switzerland participate in the data collection.

DATA COLLECTED AND INITIAL FINDINGS

The implementation of PROMs ("patient related outcome measurement"), as well as the recording of surgery-related influencing factors, enable a differentiated scientific analysis and represent a key quality feature of the registry. Initial analyses of the registry data have already provided clinically relevant findings for immediate patient care. For example, patients who underwent focal cartilage therapy prior to ACT show a clinically relevant, significantly worse outcome than patients who underwent primary ACT. First conclusions could also be drawn regarding the relevance of concomitant cartilage therapy. For example, in patients with focal cartilage damage of the medial knee joint compartment, registry data indicate that leg axis correction is indicated even in cases of mild deviation of the mechanical leg axis.

CONCLUSION

The data and findings obtained from the Cartilage Registry represent an important aspect of clinical care research and serve as a complement to well-designed, clinically prospective cohort studies, RCTs, and meta-analyses.

Prognostic factors for the management of chondral defects of the knee and ankle joint: a systematic review

Purpose

Different surgical techniques to manage cartilage defects are available, including microfracture (MFx), autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), osteoarticular auto- or allograft transplantation (OAT), autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC). This study investigated the patient-related prognostic factors on the clinical outcomes of surgically treated knee and ankle cartilage defects.

Methods

This study followed the PRISMA statement. In May 2022, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus. All the studies investigating the outcomes of surgical management for knee and/or talus chondral defects were accessed. Only studies performing mesenchymal stem cells transplantation, OAT, MFx, ACI, and AMIC were considered. A multiple linear model regression analysis through the Pearson Product–Moment Correlation Coefficient was used.

Results

Data from 184 articles (8905 procedures) were retrieved. Female sex showed a positive moderate association with visual analogue scale at last follow-up (P = 0.02). Patient age had a negative association with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (P = 0.04) and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (P = 0.03). BMI was strongly associated with graft hypertrophy (P = 0.01). Greater values of VAS at baseline negatively correlate with lower values of Tegner Activity Scale at last follow-up (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The clinical outcomes were mostly related to the patients’ performance status prior surgery. A greater BMI was associated with greater rate of hypertrophy. Female sex and older age evidenced fair influence, while symptom duration prior to the surgical intervention and cartilage defect size evidenced no association with the surgical outcome. Lesion size and symptom duration did not evidence any association with the surgical outcome.

Low postoperative complication rate with high survival rate and good clinical outcome 9 years after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee joint

PURPOSE

To investigate postoperative complications and associated risk factors for failure following autologous chondrocyte transplantation ("ACT") as well as its long-term survival and clinical function. It was hypothesized that ACT is a safe technique for cartilage repair with a low incidence of postoperative complications and rare rates of revision surgery combined with a high long-term survival and good to excellent clinical outcome in long-term-follow-up.

METHODS

All patients undergoing ACT-Cs of the knee joint between 2006 and 2012 at the author's institution were included in this retrospective study. Concomitant procedures had been performed if necessary. Early postoperative complications, revision surgeries, failure and risk factors for those events were evaluated 6 months after the surgery. Long-term clinical outcome was assessed using the Lysholm Score, the Tegner Score, a 10-grade scale for satisfaction and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at a minimum follow-up of 9 years postoperatively. Long-term survival was calculated using revision surgeries, clinical failures and conversion procedures to create a Kaplan-Meier analysis. A subgroup analysis for different defect locations was performed. 139 patients were included in this study (27% female/ 73%male; age 26.7 [21.7; 35.2] years). The median defect size was 4.0 [3.0; 6.0] cm² (40% medial femoral condyle (MFC), 17% lateral femoral condyle (LFC), 36% patella, 19% trochlea). 97 (70%) of the patients had undergone previous surgery and 84 (60%) underwent concomitant procedures.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, 8% of patients had complications (4% bleeding, 2% arthrofibrosis, 2% infection), 7% of patients needed revision surgery. 12% of patients had a prolonged deficit in ROM, that did not require revision surgery. No significant difference in terms of complications was found between the patellofemoral and femorotibial group. Patients demonstrated good patient reported long-term outcomes 9-15 years after the index surgery (Tegner: 4.7 ± 1.8; VAS: 2.4 ± 2.1; Lysholm: 80 ± 14; satisfaction with operation: 7.3 ± 1.9). Survival rates were 88% at 9 years, 85% at 11 years, and 85% at 13 years after the index procedure. Reasons for failure included debridement of ACT (n = 4; 5%), revision ACT (n = 3, 3%), conversion to total knee arthroplasty (n = 3, 3%) and conversion to High tibial osteotomy (HTO) (n = 1; 1%)).

CONCLUSION

The present study indicates ACT as an effective treatment option for femorotibial- as well as patellofemoral cartilage defects with a high long-term survival and low conversion rate as well as good long-term results regarding knee function and satisfaction. Postoperative complications needing revision surgery are rare. Prolongated deficits of range of motion appear frequently up to six months especially in patellofemoral defects, but can often be successfully addressed by intensified physiotherapy without requiring an arthrolysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Knorpelersatzverfahren und Regeneration am Knie- und Hüftgelenk

Die operative Therapie von Knorpelschäden am Kniegelenk hat sich in den letzten Jahren von vorsichtigen Anfängen mit innovativen Therapieansätzen zu einem festen und etablierten Baustein der gelenkerhaltenden Therapie entwickelt. Hingegen hat sich am Hüftgelenk erst in den letzten 10 Jahren, basierend auf einem erweiterten Verständnis grundlegender mechanischer Pathomechanismen, die gelenkerhaltende Hüftchirurgie und insbesondere die Knorpeltherapie etabliert. Der Beitrag stellt die zur Verfügung stehenden Techniken vor.

Knee registries: state of the art

Sports injuries, trauma and the globally ageing and obese population require increasing levels of knee surgery. Shared decision making has replaced the paternalistic approach to patient management. Evidence-based medicine underpins surgical treatment strategies, from consenting an individual patient to national healthcare system design. The evolution of successful knee-related registries starting from specific arthroplasty registries has given rise to ligament reconstruction, osteotomy and cartilage surgery registries developing as platforms for surgical outcome data collection. Stakeholders include surgeons and their patients, researchers, healthcare systems, as well as the funding insurers and governments. Lately, implant manufacturers have also been mandated to perform postmarket surveillance with some hoping to base that on registry data. Aiming to assess the current status of knee-related registries, we performed a comprehensive literature and web search, which yielded 23 arthroplasty, 8 ligament, 4 osteotomy and 3 articular cartilage registries. Registries were evaluated for their scope, measured variables, impact and limitations. Registries have many advantages as they aim to increase awareness of outcomes; identify trends in practice over time, early failing implants, outlier surgeon or institution performance; and assist postmarketing surveillance. International collaborations have highlighted variations in practice. The limitations of registries are discussed in detail. Inconsistencies are found in collected data and measured variables. Potential measurement and selection biases are outlined. Without mandated data collection and with apparent issues such as unverified patient reporting of complications, registries are not designed to replace adverse event recording in place of a proper safety and efficacy study, as demanded by regulators. Registry 'big data' can provide evidence of associations of problems. However, registries cannot provide evidence of causation. Hence, without careful consideration of the data and its limitations, registry data are at risk of incorrectly drawn conclusions and the potential of misuse of the results. That must be guarded against. Looking at the future, registry operators benefit from a collective experience of running registries as they mature, allowing for improvements across specialties. Large-scale registries are not only of merit, improving with stakeholder acceptance, but also are critical in furthering our understanding of our patients' outcomes. In doing so, they are a critical element for our future scientific discourse.

Cell-based treatment options facilitate regeneration of cartilage, ligaments and meniscus in demanding conditions of the knee by a whole joint approach

PURPOSE

This article provides an update on the current therapeutic options for cell-based regenerative treatment of the knee with a critical review of the present literature including a future perspective on the use of regenerative cell-based approaches. Special emphasis has been given on the requirement of a whole joint approach with treatment of comorbidities with aim of knee cartilage restoration, particularly in demanding conditions like early osteoarthritis.

METHODS

This narrative review evaluates recent clinical data and published research articles on cell-based regenerative treatment options for cartilage and other structures around the knee RESULTS: Cell-based regenerative therapies for cartilage repair have become standard practice for the treatment of focal, traumatic chondral defects of the knee. Specifically, matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) shows satisfactory long-term results regarding radiological, histological and clinical outcome for treatment of large cartilage defects. Data show that regenerative treatment of the knee requires a whole joint approach by addressing all comorbidities including axis deviation, instability or meniscus pathologies. Further development of novel biomaterials and the discovery of alternative cell sources may facilitate the process of cell-based regenerative therapies for all knee structures becoming the gold standard in the future.

CONCLUSION

Overall, cell-based regenerative cartilage therapy of the knee has shown tremendous development over the last years and has become the standard of care for large and isolated chondral defects. It has shown success in the treatment of traumatic, osteochondral defects but also for degenerative cartilage lesions in the demanding condition of early OA. Future developments and alternative cell sources may help to facilitate cell-based regenerative treatment for all different structures around the knee by a whole joint approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Factors correlating with patients' satisfaction after undergoing cartilage repair surgery-data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU)

Subjective patient satisfaction is the most relevant parameter for assessing the success of treatment after orthopaedic surgery. The aim of the present study was to correlate patient-reported outcome parameters (i.e., absolute KOOS, KOOS increase) and revision-free survival with patient’s satisfaction. Furthermore, the study aimed on the identification of pre-operative factors that are associated with patient’s satisfaction after the surgery.

For the present study, 6305 consecutive patients from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) were analyzed. Patient characteristics and outcome were correlated with patients’ satisfaction after a follow-up of three years by Spearman correlation. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Mean age was 37 ± 12.5 years, 59.7% patients were male, and 40.3% female. Most patients (46.7%) were treated with an autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). The strongest correlation of subjective satisfaction and the subscore quality of life (r = 0.682; p < 0.001) was found, whereas the post-operative increase in KOOS from the pre-operative value showed only a moderate correlation (r = 0.520; p < 0.001). There was also a significant correlation with the absolute KOOS value (r = 0.678; p < 0.001), the subscores pain (r = 0.652; p < 0.001), quality of life (r = 0.682; p < 0.001), and sports (r = 0.633; p < 0.001), whereas symptoms (r = 0.504, p < 0.001) and activities of daily life (r = 0.601; p < 0.001) showed a weaker correlation. Pain also correlated highly significant with the patient satisfaction 24 months after surgery (r =  − 0.651, p < 0.001). The correlation between satisfaction after the 2nd and 3rd year (r = 0.727; p < 0.001) is stronger than correlation after six months and three years (r = 0.422, p < 0.001). All pre-operative parameters show a very weak correlation (r < 0.1).

The use of standardized measuring instruments (KOOS and Pain) is a relevant outcome parameter in science and clinical practice, whereas absolute values represent satisfaction better than the individual increase. The subscores “pain,” “quality of life,” and “sports” represent satisfaction better than the subscores “symptoms” and “activity of daily life.” Early satisfaction has only a moderate predictive value for satisfaction after 3 years, which is of great practical relevance in particular for the assessment of potential treatment failures. It is remarkable to note that a revision surgery is only very mildly associated with increased dissatisfaction. Pre-operative factors are not reliable prediction factors for post-operative patient satisfaction.

Does Gender Influence Outcome in Cartilage Repair Surgery? An Analysis of 4,968 Consecutive Patients from the German Cartilage Registry (Knorpel Register DGOU)

The goal was to examine gender differences of patient characteristics and outcome after cartilage repair based on a collective of nearly 5,000 patients. Patient characteristics, accompanying therapies, and outcome (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], reoperations, patient satisfaction) of 4,986 patients of the German cartilage register DGOU were assessed by t test for possible gender differences. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Women were older than men (38.07 ± 12.54 vs. 26.94 ± 12.394 years, P = 0.002), more often preoperated (0.30 ± 0.63 vs. 0.24 ± 0.55, P = 0.001), and had a longer symptom duration (25.22 ± 41.20 vs. 20.67 ± 35.32 months, P < 0.001). Men had greater mean leg axis malalignment than women (3.24° ± 3.26° vs. 2.67° ± 3.06°, P < 0.001), less favorable meniscal status (P = 0.001), worse defect stage (P = 0.006), and a more severely damaged corresponding articular surface (P = 0.042). At baseline (59.84 ± 17.49 vs. 52.10 ± 17.77, P < 0.001), after 6 months (72.83 ± 15.56 vs. 66.56 ± 17.66, P < 0.001), after 12 months (77.88 ± 15.95 vs. 73.07 ± 18.12, P < 0.001), and after 24 months (79.311 ± 15.94 vs. 74.39 ± 18.81, P < 0.001), men had better absolute KOOS values, but women had better relative KOOS increases 6 months (14.59 ± 17.31 vs. 12.49 ± 16.3, P = 0.005) as well as 12 months postoperatively (20.27 ± 18.6 vs. 17.34 ± 17.79, P = 0.001) compared with preoperatively, although 12 and 24 months postoperatively they were subjectively less satisfied with the outcome (P < 0.001) and had a higher reintervention rate at 24 months (0.17 ± 0.38 vs. 0.12 ± 0.33, P = 0.008). In summary, the present work shows specific gender differences in terms of patient characteristics, defect etiology, defect localization, concomitant therapy, and the choice of cartilage repair procedure. Unexpectedly, contrary to the established scientific opinion, it could be demonstrated that women show relatively better postoperative KOOS increases, despite a higher revision rate and higher subjective dissatisfaction.

The First Report of the International Cartilage Regeneration and Joint Preservation Society's Global Registry

OBJECTIVE

The International Cartilage Regeneration and Joint Preservation Society's (ICRS's) global registry, aims to be the best source of information for patients and an unbiased resource of evidence-based medicine for scientists and clinicians working to help those unfortunate enough to suffer the pain and disability associated with articular cartilage lesions. This article constitutes the scientific summary of the reports' main findings.

DESIGN

The article outlines the historical precedents in the development of orthopedic registries from the earliest tumor registries, then local arthroplasty databases that led ultimately to international collaborations between national arthroplasty and soft tissue registries. The ICRS global cartilage registry was designed from the outset as a GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) compliant, multilingual, multinational cooperative system. It is a web-based user-friendly, live in 11 languages by end 2019, which can be accessed via https://cartilage.org/society/icrs-patient-registry/. Patients and clinicians enter data by smartphone, tablet, or computer on any knee cartilage regeneration and joint preservation treatment, including the use of focal arthroplasty. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Kujala patient-reported outcome measures are collected preoperatively, 6 months, 12 months, and annually for ten years thereafter. EQ-5D data collection will allow cost-effectiveness analysis. Strengths, weaknesses, and future plans are discussed.

RESULTS

Since inception the registry has 264 users across 50 countries. Major findings are presented and discussed, while the entire first ICRS global registry report is available at https://cartilage.org/society/icrs-patient-registry/registry-annual-reports/. Conclusion. A measure of the maturity of any registry is the publication of its findings in the peer reviewed literature. With the publication of its first report, the ICRS global registry has achieved that milestone.

Microdrilling Demonstrates Superior Patient-Reported Outcomes and Lower Revision Rates Than Traditional Microfracture: A Matched Cohort Analysis

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes and revision rates between the standard microfracture awl versus the microdrilling technique.

Methods

Microfracture patients were queried from a single-institution database between 2001 and 2016. Patient-reported outcome measure data were collected at preoperative and 6- and 12-month time points, inclusive of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Short Form 12 (SF12) Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score, and all Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales. A matching algorithm based on previous procedures, lesion size, and demographic factors created 2 technique-based cohorts. Outcomes including revision rates and both statistically and clinically significant differences (i.e., the minimally clinically important difference [MCID]) between awl and microdrill cohorts were compared using univariate statistics.

Results

A total of 68 patients (aged 32.0 ± 13.1 years, 48.5% female, body mass index 26.7 ± 5.3 kg/m²), with 34 patients in each group, were included after the match. At 6 months, the microdrilling group demonstrated significantly greater levels of improvement than the awl group on the IKDC, SF12 PCS, and KOOS Pain, Symptom, Sport, and Quality of Life (P < .04), although differences at 1 year were only maintained on the SF12 PCS instrument (P < .001). With respect to MCID achievement, the microdrilling group demonstrated greater achievement rates at 6 months on the IKDC, KOOS Pain, and KOOS Sport (P < .04). The awl group demonstrated a higher rate of revision surgery (P = .02) within 3 years of follow-up and a greater likelihood to require multiple subsequent procedures (41.1% vs 17.6%, P = .03).

Conclusions

Microdrilling demonstrated superior outcomes relative to traditional microfracture awl techniques with respect to patient-reported outcomes at 6 months and revision rates within 3 years of follow-up. In addition, clinically meaningful differences were evident at 6 months in the microdrilling group.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Decision making for concomitant high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in cartilage repair patients based on a nationwide cohort study of 4968 patients

BACKGROUND

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) for varus deformities is a common concomitant treatment in cartilage surgery. Aim of the present study was to analyze factors influencing the decision towards accompanying HTO in patients with cartilage defects of the medial femoral condyle, such as the amount of varus deformity.

METHODS

Data from 4986 patients treated for cartilage defects of the knee from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) were used for the current analysis. Seven hundred and thirty-six patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Their data were analyzed for factors influencing the decision towards performing a concomitant HTO using t test, univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The break point at which the majority of patients receive a concomitant HTO is 3° of varus deformity. Several factors apart from the amount of varus deformity (5.61 ± 2.73° vs. 1.72 ± 2.38°, p < 0.00) differed significantly between the group of patients with HTO and those without. These included defect size (441.6 ± 225.3 mm² vs. 386.5 ± 204.2 mm², p = 0.001), symptom duration (29.53 ± 44.58 months vs. 21.85 ± 34.17 months, p = 0.021), defect grade (62.5% IVa/IVb vs. 57.3% IVa/IVb, p = 0.014), integrity of corresponding joint surface (10.8% grade III-IV vs. 0.2% grade III-IV, p < 0.001), meniscus status (15.5% > 1/3 resected vs. 4.4% > 1/3 resected, p < 0.001) and number of previous surgeries (1.01 ± 1.06 vs. 0.75 ± 1.00, p = 0.001). In the stepwise multivariate binary logistic regression test, only the amount of varus deformity, symptom duration and quality of the corresponding joint surface remained significant predictors associated with performing a concomitant HTO.

CONCLUSION

Based upon data from a nationwide cohort, additional HTO in context with cartilage repair procedures of the medial femoral condyle is frequently performed even in mild varus deformities less than 5°. Other factors also seem to influence decision for HTO.

Emerging therapies for cartilage regeneration in currently excluded 'red knee' populations

The field of articular cartilage repair has made significant advances in recent decades; yet current therapies are generally not evaluated or tested, at the time of pivotal trial, in patients with a variety of common comorbidities. To that end, we systematically reviewed cartilage repair clinical trials to identify common exclusion criteria and reviewed the literature to identify emerging regenerative approaches that are poised to overcome these current exclusion criteria. The term “knee cartilage repair” was searched on clinicaltrials.gov. Of the 60 trials identified on initial search, 33 were further examined to extract exclusion criteria. Criteria excluded by more than half of the trials were identified in order to focus discussion on emerging regenerative strategies that might address these concerns. These criteria included age (<18 or >55 years old), small defects (<1 cm²), large defects (>8 cm²), multiple defect (>2 lesions), BMI >35, meniscectomy (>50%), bilateral knee pathology, ligamentous instability, arthritis, malalignment, prior repair, kissing lesions, neurologic disease of lower extremities, inflammation, infection, endocrine or metabolic disease, drug or alcohol abuse, pregnancy, and history of cancer. Finally, we describe emerging tissue engineering and regenerative approaches that might foster cartilage repair in these challenging environments. The identified criteria exclude a majority of the affected population from treatment, and thus greater focus must be placed on these emerging cartilage regeneration techniques to treat patients with the challenging “red knee”.

Toward tissue-engineering of nasal cartilages

Nasal cartilage pathologies are common; for example, up to 80% of people are afflicted by deviated nasal septum conditions. Because cartilage provides the supportive framework of the nose, afflicted patients suffer low quality of life. To correct pathologies, graft cartilage is often required. Grafts are currently sourced from the patient's septum, ear, or rib. However, their use yields donor site morbidity and is limited by tissue quantity and quality. Additionally, rhinoplasty revision rates exceed 15%, exacerbating the shortage of graft cartilage. Alternative grafts, such as irradiated allogeneic rib cartilage, are associated with complications. Tissue-engineered neocartilage holds promise to address the limitations of current grafts. The engineering design process may be used to create suitable graft tissues. This process begins by identifying the surgeon's needs. Second, nasal cartilages' properties must be understood to define engineering design criteria. Limited investigations have examined nasal cartilage properties; numerous additional studies need to be performed to examine topographical variations, for example. Third, tissue-engineering processes must be applied to achieve the engineering design criteria. Within the recent past, strategies have frequently utilized human septal chondrocytes. As autologous and allogeneic rib graft cartilage is used, its suitability as a cell source should also be examined. Fourth, quantitative verification of engineered neocartilage is critical to check for successful achievement of the engineering design criteria. Finally, following the FDA paradigm, engineered neocartilage must be orthotopically validated in animals. Together, these steps delineate a path to engineer functional nasal neocartilages that may, ultimately, be used to treat human patients. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Nasal cartilage pathologies are common and lead to greatly diminished quality of life. The ability to correct pathologies is limited by cartilage graft quality and quantity, as well as donor site morbidity and surgical complications, such as infection and resorption. Despite the significance of nasal cartilage pathologies and high rhinoplasty revision rates (15%), little characterization and tissue-engineering work has been performed compared to other cartilages, such as articular cartilage. Furthermore, most work is published in clinical journals, with little in biomedical engineering. Therefore, this review discusses what nasal cartilage properties are known, summarizes the current state of nasal cartilage tissue-engineering, and makes recommendations via the engineering design process toward engineering functional nasal neocartilage to address current limitations.