1
|
Kim H, Hur S, Jeon IH, Koh KH. Effect of Retear After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair on Return to Work and Sports in Nonathletes: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11:23259671231186408. [PMID: 37533498 PMCID: PMC10392457 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231186408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The impact of retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) on clinical outcomes of patients remains controversial. Purpose/Hypothesis The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of retear on strength recovery, return to previous levels of work, and return to sports participation. It was hypothesized that retears (1) would not have a significant effect on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and (2) would significantly inhibit strength recovery and return to previous work and sports. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods The authors collected data from patients who underwent ARCR between January 2015 and December 2019. All included patients had undergone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and strength measurements 1 year postoperatively. Minimum 2-year postoperative PROMs (Constant score, pain visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation) and status on work and sports participation were collected, and PROM scores, strength recovery (percentage compared with the contralateral shoulder), return to work, and return to sports were compared between patients with versus without retear on 1-year postoperative MRI. Additionally, factors related to return to work and sports were identified through multivariable regression analysis. Results A total of 159 patients were included, of whom 19 (11.9%) had evidence of retear. Return-to-work and return-to-sports status was evaluated in 134 (84.3%) and 93 (58.5%) patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in PROM scores between patients with and without retears; however, patients with retears exhibited significantly worse supraspinatus strength recovery (73% vs 86%; P = .018) and external rotation strength recovery (78% vs 88%; P = .030) compared with patients with intact shoulders. There were no between-group differences in return to work or sports. Active workload was associated with unsuccessful return to work, whereas preoperative participation in shoulder sports was associated with successful return to work. Conclusion Patients with postoperative retears had significantly worse postoperative strength recovery than patients with intact shoulders. Active workload and preoperative shoulder sports participation were factors associated with ability to return to work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyojune Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok Hur
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - In-Ho Jeon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyoung Hwan Koh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baumgarten KM. Can the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) be used as a stand-alone outcome instrument in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:e426-e435. [PMID: 35413432 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS There is no consensus as to which patient-determined shoulder outcome scores should be considered when analyzing patient outcomes for either clinical or research purposes. Use of multiple patient-determined outcomes may be redundant and cause increased responder burden. To date, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) has not been widely accepted as a stand-alone shoulder-specific outcome measure. The hypothesis of this study was that the SANE would correlate with and be equal or superior in responsiveness to other outcome measures that have been used in a stand-alone fashion in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder [WOOS], and Simple Shoulder Test [SST] scores). In addition, it was hypothesized that the SANE would be more relevant to each patient than the ASES assessment, further supporting the use of the SANE as a stand-alone shoulder-specific outcome measure. METHODS A retrospective review of a database of patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty was performed, in which the SANE score was recorded simultaneously with the ASES, WOOS, and/or SST score. Correlations were determined using the Pearson coefficient. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine whether correlations differed in (1) preoperative outcome and (2) postoperative outcome determinations. Responsiveness was determined by calculating the standardized response mean and the effect size of all scores. The relevance of the SANE and ASES assessments was examined using the scores of 150 consecutive patients to determine the number of questions on each assessment that were not answered. RESULTS Correlation was excellent for the SANE score and the ASES score (n = 1447, r = 0.82, P < .0001), WOOS score (n = 1514, r = 0.83, P < .0001), and SST score (n = 1095, r = 0.81, P < .0001). The correlation of preoperative scores was moderate and that of postoperative scores was strong-moderate when the SANE score was compared with all 3 other scores. All scores were highly responsive, with standardized response mean values of 2.2 for the SANE score, 2.3 for the ASES score, 1.4 for the WOOS score, and 1.6 for the SST score. The effect size of the SANE score was 2.9; ASES score, 2.9; WOOS score, 2.9; and SST score, 2.3. One hundred percent of the SANE questions were answered completely compared with 61% of the ASES questions (P < .0001). CONCLUSION In patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty, the SANE score highly correlated with the WOOS, ASES, and SST scores, which have been used as stand-alone shoulder-specific outcome measures. The SANE score may provide the same information as the WOOS, ASES, and SST score regarding outcomes with a significant reduction in responder burden. It is logical that the SANE can be used as a stand-alone instrument for patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith M Baumgarten
- Orthopedic Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, USA; Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Altintas B, Horan MP, Dornan GJ, Pogorzelski J, Godin JA, Millett PJ. The Recovery Curve of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: Mid-term Results at a Minimum of 5 Years. JSES Int 2022; 6:587-595. [PMID: 35813142 PMCID: PMC9264145 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Excellent results have been reported for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). We aim to assess the recovery curve and longitudinal effects of time, age, sex, and glenoid morphology on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after primary anatomic TSA for primary GHOA. Methods Patients who underwent primary anatomic TSA over 5 years ago were included: Short-Form 12 Physical Component Summary, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and patient satisfaction were assessed. Linear mixed-effects models were used to model progression in PROs longitudinally. Unadjusted models and models controlling for sex and age were constructed. Results Eighty-one patients (91 shoulders) were included. Significant improvements from the preoperative period to 1 year postoperatively in the median American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (48 to 93; P < .001), Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Score (42 to 11; P < .001), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (50 to 91; P < .001), and Short-Form 12 Physical Component Summary (35 to 53; P = .004) scores were noted. No significant decrease was observed for any of the outcome scores. Median satisfaction at the final follow-up was 10 out of 10. At 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 years postoperatively, 77%, 64%, 79%, 57%, 86%, 56%, and 78% of patients, respectively, reported sports participation equal to or slightly below preinjury level. There was no association between the glenoid morphology and functional outcomes. Conclusion Patients undergoing anatomic TSA for primary GHOA showed excellent improvement in PROs and satisfaction in the first year, and these results were maintained postoperatively for a minimum of 5 years. Age- and sex-adjusted models or glenoid morphology did not substantially alter any trends in PROs postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Altintas
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Jonas Pogorzelski
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jonathan A. Godin
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA
- The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA
| | - Peter J. Millett
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA
- The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA
- Corresponding author: Peter J. Millett, MD, MSc, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, The Steadman Clinic, 181 West Meadow Drive, Suite 400, Vail, CO 81657, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Simon MJK, Coghlan JA, Hughes J, Wright W, Dallalana RJ, Bell SN. Mid-term outcomes of a stemless ceramic head anatomic total shoulder replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:50. [PMID: 35033044 PMCID: PMC8760766 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04988-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In an anatomic shoulder replacement (aTSR) good results have been reported with the use of a stemless humeral prosthesis. In vitro a ceramic articulation with polyethylene has been shown to produce less polyethylene wear particles than with metal. This study aims to evaluate clinical and radiographic results of a stemless aTSR with a ceramic head articulating with a polyethylene glenoid component, with mid-term follow-up. Methods All patients (n = 92) in this prospective study had an aTSR utilizing a stemless humeral component with a ceramic head and a cemented double pegged cemented polyethylene glenoid component for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Pre- and postoperative clinical evaluations at 2 years were performed using the ASES score, Constant score, SPADI score, DASH score, VAS pain score, patient satisfaction and range of motion. There was a 5-year evaluation of SPADI, ASES, pain, and satisfaction, plus radiographic assessment of glenoid component radiolucent lines and humeral osteolysis. Results Seventy-four cases (68.1 ± 7.1 years) had a five-year follow-up and demonstrated active elevation improvement from 91.3° preoperatively to 151.1° (p < 0.001). Further improvement was identified with the ASES from 41.6 to 94.3, the SPADI from 62.9 to 4.3, VAS pain from 5.6 to 0.4 (0–10), and satisfaction levels were at 96%. Sixty-two cases had no glenoid radiolucent lines with a maximum Lazarus score of 2 in one patient. Constant scores, available up to 2 years, improved significantly from 30.3 to 77.9 (p < 0.001). There was one case that required revision for glenoid loosening. Conclusions Overall, the 5-year results of this ceramic head prosthesis demonstrated good radiographic and clinical outcomes. Trial registration ACTRN12613001183774. Registered: 29 October 2013 - Retrospectively registered. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej J K Simon
- Melbourne Shoulder and Elbow Centre, 1/80 Beach Road, Sandringham, VIC, 3191, Australia. .,University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Arnold-Heller-Strasse 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Jennifer A Coghlan
- Melbourne Shoulder and Elbow Centre, 1/80 Beach Road, Sandringham, VIC, 3191, Australia.,Department of Surgery, (School of Clinical Sciences, Monash Health) Monash University, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jeff Hughes
- Sydney Shoulder and Elbow Associates, Chatswood, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - Simon N Bell
- Melbourne Shoulder and Elbow Centre, 1/80 Beach Road, Sandringham, VIC, 3191, Australia.,Department of Surgery, (School of Clinical Sciences, Monash Health) Monash University, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Robinson PG, Williamson TR, Creighton AP, Cheng J, Murray AD, Prather H, Dines JS, Gulotta LV, Su EP, Press JM, Hawkes R, Clement ND. Rate and Timing of Return to Golf After Hip, Knee, or Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2022; 51:1644-1651. [PMID: 35019735 DOI: 10.1177/03635465211064292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The physical and mental health benefits of golf are well recognized, and as a moderate-intensity activity, it is an ideal sport for patients after joint arthroplasty. PURPOSE To assess the rate and timing of returning to golf and the factors associated with these after hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty. STUDY DESIGN Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS A search of PubMed and Medline was performed in March 2021 in line with the 2009 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. Search terms included sport, golf, and arthroplasty. The criterion for inclusion was any published research article studying return to golf after arthroplasty. Random-effects modeling was used to measure rates of returning to golf for each type of arthroplasty. RESULTS A total of 23 studies were included for review. All studies were retrospective in their methodology. The mean age of patients was 66.8 years (SD, 3.37). Four studies reported on hip arthroplasty, 6 on knee arthroplasty, and 13 on shoulder arthroplasty. Among 13 studies, the mean rate of returning to golf was 80% (95% CI, 70%-89.9%). Hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty had mean return rates of 90% (95% CI, 82%-98%), 70% (95% CI, 39%-100%), and 80% (95% CI, 68%-92%), respectively. Among 9 studies, the mean time to return to golf was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.2-6). Change in handicap was reported in 8 studies (35%) with a mean change of -0.1 (95% CI, -2.4 to +2.2). There were no studies presenting factors associated with return to golf. CONCLUSION This is the first meta-analysis of returning to golf after joint arthroplasty. The study reports a high rate of returning to golf, which was greatest after hip arthroplasty. However, the study highlights the paucity of prospective data on demographic, surgical, and golf-specific outcomes after arthroplasty. Future prospective studies are required to eliminate response bias and accurately capture golf and patient-specific outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick G Robinson
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,European Tour Performance Institute, Virginia Water, Surrey, UK
| | - Tom R Williamson
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Andrew P Creighton
- Department of Physiatry, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer Cheng
- Department of Physiatry, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew D Murray
- European Tour Performance Institute, Virginia Water, Surrey, UK.,Public Health and Medical Department, The R&A, St Andrews, UK.,Department of Sports and Exercise/Physical Activity for Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Heidi Prather
- Department of Physiatry, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joshua S Dines
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lawrence V Gulotta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Edwin P Su
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joel M Press
- Department of Physiatry, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Nick D Clement
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Küffer J, Taha ME, Hoffmeyer P, Cunningham G. Return to sport after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 2021; 6:771-778. [PMID: 34667648 PMCID: PMC8489481 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
The main goal of this study was to determine the rate of return to sport (RTS) after shoulder arthroplasty. A systematic review of the literature was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. All clinical studies written in English, French or German, with a level of evidence of 1 to 4, and evaluating return to sport after shoulder arthroplasty, were included. A total of 23 studies were included with 2199 patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty (HA), anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Mean age was 68 years (range 18 to 92.6), sex ratio (male:female) was 1:1.5. The surgery was performed on the non-dominant/dominant shoulder in 1:1.8 cases. The mean follow-up was 4.2 years. The rate of RTS was 75.5% with a mean time of 7 months. It was 77.4% for TSA, 75% for RSA and 71.2% for HA (P = non-significant). RTS after shoulder arthroplasty is high, regardless the type of arthroplasty, with a trend for a higher rate after TSA. Patients who were able to maintain a sport activity preoperatively had a greater chance of RTS after arthroplasty. Failure to RTS seems to be mostly linked to the severity of the underlying condition and length of preoperative disability.
Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:771-778. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200147
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohy E Taha
- Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Basel University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Pierre Hoffmeyer
- Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland
| | - Gregory Cunningham
- Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland.,Shoulder Center, Hirslanden Clinique la Colline, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yalcin S, Scarcella M, Everhart J, Samuel L, Miniaci A. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With a Nonspherical Humeral Head and Inlay Glenoid in Elite Weight Lifters: A Prospective Case Series. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9:23259671211021055. [PMID: 34377719 PMCID: PMC8330482 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211021055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Weight lifting after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) can place significant stresses on implants that could lead to instability, loosening, and increased wear. A TSA system with nonspherical humeral head resurfacing and inlay glenoid—which improves the biomechanics and thus reduces instability, wear, and potential loosening—may be able to tolerate repetitive loads from weight lifting. Purpose: To determine clinical and radiographic outcomes after TSA in weight lifters. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 16 weight lifters (mean ± SD age, 57.2 ± 7.8 years; 15 male) undergoing primary anatomic TSA (n = 17 shoulders, 1 staged bilateral) with nonspherical humeral head resurfacing and inlay glenoid replacement for glenohumeral osteoarthritis between February 2015 and February 2019. Exclusion criteria were rotator cuff deficiency, revision TSA, post-traumatic arthritis, and inflammatory arthritis. Outcome measures included the rate of return to weight lifting, results of patient-reported outcome measures (Penn Shoulder Score, Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, and 12-Item Veterans RAND Health Survey), radiographic outcomes, and complication rate. Results: Follow-up was obtained on all patients at a mean of 38 months (range, 14-63 months). All patients returned to competitive weight lifting at 15.6 ± 6.9 weeks. Compared to the preoperative weight lifting level, at last follow-up patients reported performance at the following level: lighter weight, 1 (6%); same weight, 8 (50%); heavier weight, 7 (44%). Preoperative eccentric posterior glenoid wear was common (71% Walch B2 classification; 12/17), but posterior humeral subluxation improved at follow-up according to the Walch index (mean, 55.5% preoperative vs 48.5% postoperative; P < .001) and contact point ratio (mean, 63.9% preoperative vs 50.1% postoperative; P < .001). Pre- to postoperative improvements were seen in Penn Shoulder Score (44.3 vs 82.6; P < .001), Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (50.6 vs 91.1; P < .001), and 12-Item Veterans RAND Health Survey physical component score but not mental component score. No signs of radiographic loosening were detected in follow-up images, nor were there any postoperative instability episodes or revision surgeries. Conclusion: There were substantial improvements in shoulder function and a high rate of return to weight lifting after TSA with a nonspherical humeral head resurfacing and inlay glenoid component. Radiographically, the humeral head centralized on the glenoid after surgery, and there was no evidence of component loosening at a mean 38-month follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sercan Yalcin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael Scarcella
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Joshua Everhart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Linsen Samuel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Anthony Miniaci
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tangtiphaiboontana J, Mara KC, Jensen AR, Camp CL, Morrey ME, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Return to Sports After Primary Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Outcomes at Mean 4-Year Follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9:23259671211012393. [PMID: 34179208 PMCID: PMC8202274 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211012393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: With the expanding use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to treat various shoulder conditions, there has been a rise in the number of RSAs performed, especially in physically active patients. Limited information regarding sports after RSA is available to properly counsel patients on postoperative expectations. Purpose: To assess the rate of return to sports as well as the ability to return to the same level of preoperative intensity, frequency, and duration of sport after primary RSA. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent primary RSA at our institution between 2014 and 2016. Shoulder motion, Subjective Shoulder Value score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, pre- and postoperative sports activities, and barriers to return to sport were assessed in 109 patients after RSA (93 patients with unilateral RSA and 16 patients with bilateral RSA). The mean age at the time of surgery was 70 years (range, 34-86 years), with a mean follow-up of 3.9 years (range, 2-12 years). Results: The mean rate of return to sports was 70.1% (range, 0%-100%). There was no difference in return to sports between those with uni- and bilateral RSA (P = .64). Fishing, swimming, elliptical/treadmill, and hunting were the most common sports after RSA with return rates of 91%, 73%, 86%, and 82% respectively. A majority of patients returned to the same level of preoperative intensity, frequency, and duration for all sports except for climbing and swimming. There was a lower mean rate of return for high-demand sports (62.9%) compared with low- and medium-demand sports (76.7%) (P = .005). The most common reasons for inability to return to sports included limited motion, fear of injury, and weakness. Conclusion: Patients who had undergone primary uni- or bilateral RSA reported a 70.1% rate of return to sports with maintenance of the same level of intensity, duration, and frequency of preoperative sport participation. Rates of return to high-demand sports were lower than low- and medium-demand sports. Patients also had difficulty returning to overhead sports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kristin C Mara
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Andrew R Jensen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Christopher L Camp
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mark E Morrey
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Salem HS, Park DH, Thon SG, Bravman JT, Seidl AJ, McCarty EC, Frank RM. Return to Golf After Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49:1109-1115. [PMID: 32678680 DOI: 10.1177/0363546520923070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of golfers aged ≥65 years has increased in recent years, and shoulder arthritis is prevalent in this age group. Guidelines for return to golf (RTG) after shoulder arthroplasty have not been fully established. PURPOSE To review the data available in the current literature on RTG after shoulder arthroplasty. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. METHODS A systematic review based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was performed. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library using the terms "shoulder,""arthroplasty,""replacement," and "golf." The authors sought to include all studies investigating RTG after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), shoulder hemiarthroplasty (HA), and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Outcomes of interest included indications for shoulder arthroplasty, surgical technique, rehabilitation protocol, amount of time between surgery and resumption of golf activity, and patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS A total of 10 studies were included, 2 of which reported on golf performance after shoulder arthroplasty. The other 8 studies described return to sports after shoulder arthroplasty with golf-specific data for our analysis. Three studies that included patients who underwent TSA reported RTG rates ranging from 89% to 100% after mean follow-up periods of 5.1 to 8.4 months. Two studies included patients who underwent TSA and HA and reported RTG rates of 77% and 100% after mean intervals of 5.8 and 4.5 months, respectively. Two studies included patients who underwent RSA, with RTG rates of 50% and 79% after mean postoperative intervals of 5.3 and 6 months, respectively. One study included only patients undergoing HA, with an RTG rate of 54% and a mean RTG time of 6.5 months. Varying surgical procedures and baseline patient characteristics precluded our ability to draw conclusions regarding surgical technique, rehabilitation protocol, or patient-reported outcome measures among studies reporting these data. CONCLUSION Most patients who undergo a shoulder arthroplasty procedure can expect to resume playing golf approximately 6 months after the index procedure. The rate of return may be lower after RSA and HA as compared with anatomic TSA. The data presented in our review can help physicians counsel patients who wish to continue golf participation after a shoulder arthroplasty procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hytham S Salem
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Do H Park
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Stephen G Thon
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jonathan T Bravman
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Adam J Seidl
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Eric C McCarty
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Rachel M Frank
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Glenohumeral arthritis in the young adult is a particularly challenging condition for which optimal treatment algorithms have yet to be established. Arthroscopic joint-preserving treatments have the advantage of delaying arthroplasty in this younger population while maintaining the patient's natural anatomy and do not appear to compromise later arthroplasty. Various surgical techniques are available such that the overall procedure is tailored to the patient's individual pathology. Most short- and mid-term studies show good outcomes with low conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty and sustained improvements in functional outcome scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Carver
- Lake Tahoe Sports Medicine Fellowship, 212 Elks Point Road, Suite 200, PO Box 11889, Zephyr Cove, NV 89448, USA. https://twitter.com/carversportsmed
| | - Tyler J Brolin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Campbell Clinic, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Erickson BJ, Ling D, Wong A, Eno JJ, Dines JS, Dines DM, Gulotta LV. Does having a rotator cuff repair prior to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty influence the outcome? Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B:63-67. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.101b1.bjj-2018-0874.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Aims The number of rotator cuff repairs that are undertaken is increasing. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is the procedure of choice for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy. We sought to determine whether patients who underwent rotator cuff repair and subsequent RSA had different outcomes compared with a matched control group who underwent RSA without a previous rotator cuff repair. Patients and Methods All patients with a history of rotator cuff repair who underwent RSA between 2000 and 2015 with a minimum follow-up of two years were eligible for inclusion as the study group. Outcomes, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, were compared with a matched control group of patients who underwent RSA without having previously undergone rotator cuff repair. Results The study group included 45 patients. Their mean age was 69 years (sd 8.6) and 27 patients (60%) were women. The mean ASES score improved from 43.1 to 76.6 two years postoperatively, and to 66.9 five years postoperatively. There was no significant difference between the outcomes at two years in the two groups (all p ≥ 0.05), although there was significantly more improvement in ASES scores in the control group (44.5 vs 33.4; p = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between ASES scores at two and five years when baseline ASES scores were matched in the two groups (p = 0.42 at two years; p = 0.35 at five years). Conclusion Significant improvements in ASES scores were seen following RSA in patients who had previously undergone rotator cuff repair. They had higher baseline ASES scores than those who had not previously undergone this surgery. However, there was no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups, two years postoperatively. Previous rotator cuff repair does not appear to affect the early outcome after RSA adversely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. J. Erickson
- Division of Sports and Shoulder, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - D. Ling
- Division of Sports and shoulder, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - A. Wong
- Division of Sports and shoulder, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - J. J. Eno
- Kaiser Health System, California, USA
| | - J. S. Dines
- Division of Sports and shoulder, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - D. M. Dines
- Division of Sports and shoulder, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - L. V. Gulotta
- Division of Sports and shoulder, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|