Patient-Reported Knee Outcome Scores With Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Are Similar to Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery

Partial Scapholunate Interosseous Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review of Treatment Options

Purpose  This systematic review summarizes the existing evidence on treatment options and outcomes for partial scapholunate interosseous ligament (pSLIL) injuries. Methods  A systematic electronic search of Medline, Embase, and CINAHL was performed from inception through to February 13, 2022. All primary research articles addressing the treatment of pSLIL tears were eligible for inclusion regardless of timing of surgery, surgical technique, or rehabilitation. The PRISMA Checklist guided the reporting and data abstraction. Descriptive statistics and forest plots are presented. Results  A total of 14 studies with 342 patients were included for analysis. Treatments were categorized into four groups: electrothermal shrinkage (ES), arthroscopic capsuloplasty (AC), open capsulodesis (OC), and no treatment (NT). There were five studies in the ES group ( N  = 69, mean age = 34.3 ± 3.3 years), three studies in the AC group ( N  = 138, mean age = 32.2 ± 3.8 years), five studies in the OC group ( N  = 123, mean age of 30.7 ± 7.8 years), and one study in the NT group ( N  = 12, mean age = 43 years, range = 28-67 years). The average postintervention visual analog scale pain score for the ES group was 1.4 ± 0.5 (from 5.7 ± 1.8), for the AC group was 3.2 ± 1.3 (from 6.6 ± 0), for the OC group was 2.3 ± 2.1 (from 5.6 ± 1.6), and for the NT group was 3.2 (from 7.6). The wrist extension range of motion improved postoperatively for all intervention groups (ES = 66.3°-70.7°; AC = 67°-74.5°; and OC = 48.9°-63.5°), whereas it remained unchanged for the NT group (46°-45°). Grip strength also improved in all intervention groups (ES = 17.9-29.9 kg; AC = 24.0-32.2 kg; and OC = 15.8-26.6 kg), while the NT group remained unchanged (25-24 kg). The radiographic scapholunate gap improved postoperatively in all groups that reported pre- and postintervention (ES = 2.2-1.9 mm; OC = 2.5-1.8 mm) and slightly worsened in the NT group (2.5-2.7 mm). In the ES group, there were three complications (11.5%, no major complications), in the AC group there was one major complication (0.9%, complex regional pain syndrome [CRPS]), and in the OC group there were six complications (15.4%, four major complications-CRPS). Conclusion  All interventional treatment options (ES, AC, and OC) provided significant improvements in patient-reported pain, range of motion, grip strength, and radiographic parameters, with low complication rates. In comparison, no improvement in range of motion or grip strength was noted in the NT group. Therefore, surgical management of pSLIL injuries is an effective and relatively safe treatment option. Further studies comparing the outcomes of specific surgical treatments are warranted to further elucidate the optimal management option for pSLIL tears. Level of Evidence  Level III, systematic review of Level III-IV studies.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Augmentation With Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate, Demineralized Bone Matrix, and Suture Tape Shows No Difference in Outcomes-But Faster Functional Recovery-Versus Non-augmented Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), demineralized bone matrix (DBM), and suture tape augmentation (STA) versus ACLR without biological augmentation or STA.

METHODS

We performed a prospective randomized controlled trial at a single institution to compare ACLR with BMAC, DBM, and STA (group A) versus ACLR without biological augmentation or STA (group NA). The study sought to include 100 patients. Skeletally mature patients younger than 25 years received quadriceps tendon autograft, whereas patients aged 25 years or older underwent allograft ACLR with an all-inside technique. Patients with concomitant meniscal pathologies were included. The primary outcomes compared were range of motion (ROM), limb symmetry, and patient-reported outcomes. Secondary outcomes included radiographic outcomes and surgical complications. Univariate and mixed-model regression analyses were used to compare outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were included (29 patients in group A [11 female patients, 38%] and 30 patients in group NA [15 female patients, 50%]). Early ROM at 6 weeks (125° of flexion vs 109° of flexion, P < .0001) and limb symmetry at 12 weeks (80.6% vs 36.7% [delta, 43.9%], P < .001) were significantly improved in group A. At 2 years, International Knee Documentation Committee scores were similar (91.1 ± 12.7 vs 85.3 ± 10.8, P = .109). Quality-of-life subscores of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were significantly enhanced in group A (85.2 ± 20.9 vs 72.1 ± 20.4, P = .042). In 22 patients (12 in group A and 10 in group NA), computed tomography scans were obtained at 6 months to compare bone tunnel healing. Overall, the mean increase in bone tunnel diameter was significantly smaller in group A than in group NA. No difference in graft rerupture or reoperation rate was observed. Reoperations were performed for stiffness in 7 of 59 patients (11.9%) (3 [10%] in group A vs 4 [13%] in group NA; P > .999).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in International Knee Documentation Committee scores between groups at 2-year follow-up. Functional outcomes including early ROM and limb symmetry were significantly improved in patients who received ACLR with BMAC, DBM, and STA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, randomized controlled trial.

No increased complication rate with the use of soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft for primary ACL reconstruction - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The autograft of choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains debateable. Recently there has been increased popularity of soft tissue quadriceps tendon (s-QT) autograft due to less donor site morbidity, reduced anterior knee pain and comparable re-operation and complication rates. The aim of this review was to analyse functional outcomes of primary ACLR using s-QT in adult population without the bone plug and to report its complication profile against other autografts.

PATIENT AND METHODS

This systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and a review of literature was conducted on four online databases (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Google Scholar). Clinical studies reporting on patients undergoing primary ACLR with s-QT autograft or in comparison to BPTB or HS autografts with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were included. The studies were inclusive of only all soft tissue QT autograft regardless of the implants or fixation method used. Critical appraisal of studies was conducted using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were eligible. There were three randomised control studies (RCT) and 11 non-randomised comparative studies with 1543 patients who underwent ACLR. 682 underwent s-QT, 498 had hamstring tendon (HT) and 174 had bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB). 60% (n = 930) were males and mean follow up was 23.6 months (6-65). Eight studies reported post-operative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). The mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was 91.5 ± 15.1 whereas mean Lysholm score was 90 ± 3.9. Five studies reported on laxity with mean anterior tibial translation (ATT) of 1.28 ± 1.09 mm. Overall complication rate of s-QT ACLR was 6% with 3% graft failure, 0.52% arthrofibrosis, 0.2% infection, 0.75% revision ACLR. There was no significant difference in functional outcome scores, knee stability and range of motion (ROM) between s-QT, HT and BPTB.

CONCLUSION

s-QT for ACLR has a comparable functional outcome, laxity, failure and with overall graft failure rate of 3%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Evaluation of Failed ACL Reconstruction: An Updated Review

Failure rates among primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) range from 3.2% to 11.1%. Recently, there has been increased focus on surgical and anatomic considerations which predispose patients to failure, including excessive posterior tibial slope (PTS), unaddressed high-grade pivot shift, and improper tunnel placement. The purpose of this review was to provide a current summary and analysis of the literature regarding patient-related and technical factors surrounding revision ACLR, rehabilitation considerations, overall outcomes and return to sport (RTS) for patients who undergo revision ACLR. There is a convincingly higher re-tear and revision rate in patients who undergo ACLR with allograft than autograft, especially amongst the young, athletic population. Unrecognized Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PLC) injury is a common cause of ACLR failure and current literature suggests concurrent operative management of high-grade PLC injuries. Given the high rates of revision surgery in young active patients who return to pivoting sports, the authors recommend strong consideration of a combined ACLR + Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) or Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure in this population. Excessive PTS has been identified as an independent risk factor for ACL graft failure. Careful consideration of patient-specific factors such as age and activity level may influence the success of ACL reconstruction. Additional technical considerations including graft choice and fixation method, tunnel position, evaluation of concomitant posterolateral corner and high-grade pivot shift injuries, and the role of excessive posterior tibial slope may play a significant role in preventing failure.

Both Quadriceps and Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autografts Improve Postoperative Stability and Functional Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Purpose

To compare postoperative knee stability, functional outcomes, and complications after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) versus quadriceps tendon autograft.

Methods

In accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines, the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published in 2002 or later. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: randomized controlled trials that included patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with BPTB or quadriceps tendon autograft including all soft tissue and bone-quadriceps tendon and in which measures of postoperative stability and functional outcomes were reported. Studies that were not written in English and those that analyzed animals or cadavers, were not randomized controlled trials, or used other grafts (e.g., hamstring) were excluded.

Results

The initial search identified 348 studies, 6 of which were included in this systematic review. Two of the six studies found no significant difference in performance outcomes or complications between quadriceps and BPTB autografts. One study found that patients receiving quadriceps autograft self-reported improved knee functional status compared with those receiving BPTB autograft. Another study found that quadriceps autograft resulted in a significantly reduced Quadriceps Index postoperatively compared with BPTB autograft (69.5 vs 82.8, P = .01) but found no difference in postoperative quadriceps strength. An additional study found that the outcomes of quadriceps tendon and BPTB autografts were equivalent per the International Knee Documentation Committee scale, but anterior knee pain was less severe in patients with quadriceps tendon autograft. Furthermore, one study revealed the overall International Knee Documentation Committee score was reported as normal significantly more often in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with BPTB autograft (85% vs 50%, P < .001) and that donor-site morbidity was greater in patients with quadriceps autograft. No significant difference was found in complications requiring reoperation across studies.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with either BPTB or quadriceps tendon autograft reported improved postoperative knee stability and functional outcomes. There is no significant difference in complications between quadriceps autograft use and BPTB autograft use.

Level of Evidence

Level III, systematic review of Level III retrospective studies.

Tape-Reinforced Graft Suturing and Retensioning of Adjustable-Loop Cortical Buttons Improve Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Biomechanics in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the biomechanical effects of tape-reinforced graft suturing and graft retensioning for all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (ASTQT) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in a full-construct human cadaveric model.

METHODS

Harvested cadaveric ASTQT grafts were assigned to either (1) double-suspensory adjustable-loop cortical button device (ALD) fixation in which both graft ends were fixed with a suspensory fixation device with (n = 5) or without (n = 5) tape-reinforced suturing or (2) single-suspensory distal tendon fixation in which only the patellar end was fixed with an ALD (n = 5) or fixed-loop cortical button device (FLD) (n = 5). All specimens were prepared using a No. 2 whipstitch technique, and tape-reinforced specimens had an integrated braided tape implant. Graft preparation time was recorded for double-suspensory constructs. Samples were tested on an electromechanical testing machine using a previously published protocol simulating rehabilitative kinematics and loading.

RESULTS

Tape-reinforced graft suturing resulted in greater graft load retention after cycling (11.9% difference, P = .021), less total elongation (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)], 5.57 mm [3.50-7.65 mm] vs 32.14 mm [25.38-38.90 mm]; P < .001), greater ultimate failure stiffness (mean [95% CI], 171.9 N/mm [158.8-185.0 N/mm] vs 119.4 N/mm [108.7-130.0 N/mm]; P < .001), and less graft preparation time (36.4% difference, P < .001) when compared with unreinforced specimens. Retensioned ALD constructs had less cyclic elongation compared with FLD constructs (mean total elongation [95% CI], 7.04 mm [5.47-8.61 mm] vs 12.96 mm [8.67-17.26 mm]; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Tape-reinforced graft suturing improves time-zero ASTQT ACLR construct biomechanics in a cadaveric model with 83% less total elongation, 44% greater stiffness, and reduced preparation time compared with a whipstitched graft without tape reinforcement. ALD fixation improves construct mechanics when compared with FLD fixation as evidenced by 46% less total elongation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Tape-reinforced implants and graft retensioning using ALDs improve time-zero ACLR graft construct biomechanics in a time-zero biomechanical model. Clinical studies will be necessary to determine whether these implants improve clinical outcomes including knee laxity and the incidence of graft rupture.

Various Definitions of Failure Are Used in Studies of Patients Who Underwent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Purpose

To conduct a literature review to assess the definitions of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure used throughout the orthopaedic literature.

Methods

A systematic search of Embase, Ovid Medline, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science was conducted by a university librarian to identity level I-IV clinical studies on ACLR failure. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients who underwent ACLR and included a definition of failure of ACLR. Patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repairs, animal/cadaver studies, review studies, non-English language articles, and non-full text articles were excluded. Failure data were extracted from each study and categorized. Other data that were extracted included follow-up time after ACLR, failure reoperation rate, and failure reoperation procedure. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data.

Results

Out of 2,775 studies, 104 (3.75%) met inclusion criteria and were analyzed in this review. The most common definition of ACLR failure included the use of a physical examination, specifically Lachman's test (21/104 [20.2%]), anterior laxity assessment, or a Pivot-Shift test (24/104 [35.2%]) or undergoing or requiring revision ACLR (39/104 [37.5%]). Although some studies used quantitative tests or imaging to help define "failure," others simply defined it as graft rerupture that was otherwise not defined (22/104 [22.5%]). Other common definitions included: the use of imaging (magnetic resonance imaging/radiographs) to confirm graft re-rupture (37/104 [35.6%]), patient-reported outcomes (recurrent instability)/patient reported outcomes measures (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Tegner) (18/104 [17.3%]), and the use of an arthrometer (KT-1000/2000, Rollimeter, or Kneelax) (17/104 [16.3%]). The least common definitions included graft failure or rerupture confirmed by arthroscopy (13/104 [12.5%]) and nonrevision surgery (2/104 [1.0%]). The failure rate of this procedure ranged from 0% to 100% depending on the definition of "failure."

Conclusion

In this study, we found that a variety of definitions of failure are used among studies published in the orthopaedic literature. The most common criteria for failure of ACLR were the results of physical examination tests (35%), the need for undergoing a revision ACLR (36%), and the use of imaging to diagnose the failure (34%). About 17% of studies included in this review used patient-reported outcomes, specifically recurrent instability, or PROMs (IKDC, KOOS, Tegner) in their assessment of failure of ACLR. The least used definitions of "failure" of ACLR included nonrevision ACLR surgery (2%). Although some studies used similar tests or categories in their definition of failure, there were a variety of score and grade cutoff points between them.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.

ACL Reconstruction With Quadriceps Soft Tissue Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft in Cutting and Pivoting Athletes: Outcomes at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Background

The optimal graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) in the high-level cutting and pivoting athlete remains controversial. Studies have shown similar outcomes when directly comparing bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft versus quadriceps soft tissue (QST) autograft in the general population. However, no studies have directly compared these 2 grafts in athletes participating in cutting and pivoting sports.

Hypothesis

It was hypothesized that, compared with BPTB autograft, the QST autograft would result in similar patient-reported outcomes and rates of retear, return to sport, and complications.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed on athletes participating in cutting and pivoting sports (soccer, American football, lacrosse, and basketball) who underwent primary ACLR with either BPTB autograft or QST autograft chosen by the athlete between January 2015 and January 2019. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale were used to evaluate patient-reported outcomes. Return-to-sport and complication rates were identified. Descriptive statistics were expressed using Mann-Whitney test or Student t test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables.

Results

A total of 68 athletes (32 QST, 36 BPTB) were included for analysis. The percentage follow-up was 89% (32/36) for the QST autograft group and 86% (36/42) for the BPTB autograft group. The 2-year IKDC score (QST, 90.5 ± 6.6 vs BPTB, 89.7 ± 7.8) and 2-year Lysholm score (QST, 91.3 ± 7.5 vs BPTB, 90.5 ± 8.6) were similar between groups. The percentage of athletes able to return to sport within the follow-up period was also similar (88% vs 83%; P = .63). There were 2 retears requiring revision in the BPTB group (6%) and no retears in the QST group (P = .18). One contralateral ACL rupture occurred in the QST group (3%) and 4 in the BPTB group (11%) (P = .21).

Conclusion

The QST and BPTB autografts demonstrated similar patient-reported outcomes, return-to-sport rates, and complication rates after primary ACLR at 2-year follow-up. Both autografts appear to be reliable and consistent options for ACLR in the cutting and pivoting athlete.

Knee Extensor Mechanism Complications After Autograft Harvest in ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Existing systematic reviews have sought to characterize the relative donor-site morbidity of bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) and quadriceps tendon (QT) grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, no studies have reported the pooled proportions of patellar fractures and donor tendon ruptures across the body of literature.

Purpose

To estimate the proportion of patellar fractures, patellar tendon ruptures, and QT ruptures associated with BTB or QT autograft harvest during ACLR using published data.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using 3 online databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). A total of 800 manuscripts were included in the initial research of peer-reviewed articles in English that reported extensor mechanism complications associated with graft harvest in patients after ACLR. Pooled proportions of patellar fractures, patellar tendon ruptures, and QT ruptures were calculated for each graft type (BTB, QT) using a random-effects model for meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 28 studies were analyzed. The pooled proportion of patellar fractures was 0.57% (95% CI, 0.34%-0.91%) for the BTB harvest and 2.03% (95% CI, 0.78%-3.89%) for the QT harvest. The proportion of patellar tendon ruptures was 0.22% (95% CI, 0.14%-0.33%) after the BTB harvest, and the proportion of QT ruptures was 0.52% (95% CI, 0.06%-1.91%) after the QT harvest. The majority of included studies (16/28 [57.1%]) had an evidence level of 4.

Conclusion

Based on the current literature, the proportion of extensor mechanism complications after ACLR using either a BTB or a QT autograft is low, indicating that the extensor mechanism harvest remains a safe option. A higher proportion of patellar fractures was noted for QT grafts and a higher proportion of donor tendon ruptures was noted for QT grafts compared with BTB grafts.

Reduced Incidence of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Internal Brace Augmentation

Background

Revision rates and outcome measures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with suture tape as an internal brace is not well-documented because of the emerging nature of the technique.

Hypothesis

ACLR with internal bracing (IB) would lead to decreased revision ACLR compared with traditional ACLR while exhibiting comparable patient outcomes.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 200 patients were included in this study. Patients aged between 13 and 39 years at the time of surgery who underwent primary autograft ACLR with IB between 2010 and 2020 and were enrolled in our institution's registry with a minimum of 2-year follow-up were identified and matched 1 to 1 with a non-internal brace (no-IB) group based on concomitant procedures and patient characteristics. Pre- and postoperatively, patients completed the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Marx activity rating scale, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey, and visual analog scale for pain. Knee laxity measurements via the KT-1000 arthrometer were included in the pre- and postoperative objective clinical assessments.

Results

A total of 100 IB patients were matched with 100 no-IB patients based primarily on concomitant procedures and secondarily on patient characteristics. The IB group underwent significantly fewer revision ACLRs (1% vs 8%; P = .017). Even though the no-IB group had a significantly longer mean final follow-up time (48.6 months [95% CI, 45.4-51.7] vs 33.4 months [95% CI, 30.3-36.5]; P < .001), the time elapsed from the original ACLR to the revision did not differ significantly between groups, and the mean ages for the IB and no-IB groups were comparable (19 vs 19.9 years). All postoperative patient-reported outcome scores between the 2 groups were comparable and significantly improved postoperatively except for the Marx score, which significantly decreased stepwise for both groups postoperatively. KT-1000 measurements significantly improved in both groups after surgery with the IB and no-IB cohorts yielding comparable results at the manual maximum pull (0.97 vs 0.65 mm).

Conclusion

ACLR with IB resulted in a significantly decreased risk of revision ACLRs while maintaining comparable patient-reported outcomes. Therefore, incorporating an internal brace into ACLR appears to be safe and effective within these study parameters.

Current trends in graft choice for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - part II: In-vivo kinematics, patient reported outcomes, re-rupture rates, strength recovery, return to sports and complications

Postoperative patient satisfaction after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is influenced mainly by the degree of pain, the need for reoperation, and functional performance in daily activities and sports. Graft choice has shown to have an influence on postoperative outcomes after ACL-R. While patient reported outcomes measurements do not differ between graft options, evidence shows that normal knee kinematics is not fully restored after ACL-R with an increase in postoperative anterior tibial translation (ATT). Postoperative graft rupture rates seem to favor bone-patella-tendon-bone (BPTB) and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts over HT or allografts. While return to sports rates seem comparable between different graft types, postoperative extensor strength is reduced in patients with BPTB and QT whereas flexion strength is weakened in patients with HT. Postoperative donor site morbidity is highest in BPTB but comparable between HT and QT. With all graft options having advantages and drawbacks, graft choice must be individualized and chosen in accordance with the patient.

The Associations Between Quadriceps Tendon Graft Thickness and Isokinetic Performance

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using the quadriceps tendon is an increasingly popular technique. Both partial-thickness quadriceps tendon (PT-Q) and full-thickness quadriceps tendon (FT-Q) graft depths are employed.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess isokinetic peak torque, average power, and total work during knee extension in patients with FT-Q or PT-Q grafts for ACLR. We hypothesized that both groups would show lower isokinetic values for the operated side, with greater deficits in the FT-Q group than in the PT-Q group.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 26 patients who underwent ACLR with either an FT-Q or PT-Q graft were recruited between June 2021 and November 2021. Patients underwent isokinetic knee extension testing at > 1 year after surgery. Mixed repeated-measures analysis of covariance with least square difference post hoc testing was used to determine significant differences or interactions for all variables.

RESULTS

Peak torque was significantly lower for the operated limb than the nonoperated limb in the FT-Q group (mean difference [MD] ± standard error [SE], -38.6 ± 8.3 Nċm [95% CI, -55.7 to -21.5 Nċm]; P < .001; d = 0.90) but not in the PT-Q group (MD ± SE, -7.3 ± 7.7 Nċm [95% CI, -23.2 to 8.5 Nċm]; P = .348; d = 0.20). Similarly, average power for the operated limb was lower than that for the nonoperated limb in the FT-Q group (MD ± SE, -53.6 ± 13.4 W [95% CI, -81.3 to -26.9 W]; P < .001; d = 0.88) but not in the PT-Q group (MD ± SE, -4.1 ± 12.4 W [95% CI, -29.8 to 21.5 W]; P = .742; d = 0.07), and total work was lower for the operated limb compared with the nonoperated limb in the FT-Q group (MD ± SE, -118.2 ± 27.1 J [95% CI, -174.3 to -62.2 J]; P < .001; d = 0.96) but not in the PT-Q group (MD ± SE, -18.3 ± 25.1 J [95% CI, -70.2 to 33.6 J]; P = .472; d = 0.15).

CONCLUSION

The FT-Q group showed significant deficits in the operated limb compared with the nonoperated limb for all isokinetic variables. In contrast, no significant differences were found between the nonoperated and operated limbs for the PT-Q group.

Less than 1% risk of donor-site quadriceps tendon rupture post-ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to develop a comprehensive complications profile for quadriceps tendon-autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (QT ACL-R).

METHODS

A traditional and grey literature search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, and many grey literature sources were searched from inception to May 29, 2022. All studies were searched and screened in duplicate with included studies being of all levels of evidence, reporting complications, and with patients of all ages undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft in the last 15 years. Studies were excluded if they had cadaveric or animal subjects or were reviews. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using MINORS criteria for non-randomised studies and Cochrane's RoB 2.0 for randomised studies. Data were summarised with weighted event rates generated under a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 55 studies (5315 reconstructions) were included: 32 used quadriceps tendon with bone block (B-QT), 19 used all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (S-QT), and four did not report the QT graft subtype used. Included patients had an age range of 6.2-58 years and an average reported follow-up time of 28.1 months (range, 6-90 months) for non-randomised studies and 34.3 months (range, 0.233-120 months) for randomised studies. Pooled incidence rates for clinically relevant major complications included contralateral ACL injury at 6.0%, postoperative meniscal issues at 5.4%, cyclops lesions at 4.8%, graft failure at 4.1%, patellar fracture at 2.2%, hardware removal at 1.7%, infection at 1.5%, and donor-site quadriceps tendon rupture at 0.7%. Pooled incidence rates for clinically relevant minor complications included anterior knee pain at 9.7%, kneeling pain at 9.5%, sensation deficits at 4.4%, loss of extension at 4.2%, donor-site tendinopathy at 3.9%, cosmetic issues at 1.8%, and hematoma at 1.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

QT ACL-R resembles other graft types in its rates and types of postoperative complications. In this exploratory systematic review, no complications of QT ACL-R were found to be disproportionately represented in the literature. This graft type should remain an option with comparable complication rates to other graft choices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

REGISTRATION

This study was preregistered under PROSPERO with preregistration code CRD42022302078.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon versus quadriceps tendon with bone block

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether there was a difference in clinical outcomes between patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (sQT) autograft versus QT with bone block (bQT).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 708 patients who underwent QT ACLR was conducted. Primary ACLR patients with at least 1 year of follow-up were identified and those who received sQT were compared to those who received bQT. Data collection entailed patient demographics, surgical variables, patient reported outcomes (PROs), knee stability testing, and complications. The primary outcome of interest was International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, reported as mean score, pre- and postoperative difference, and number who met minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Secondary outcomes included Lachman and pivot shift grade, other patient reported outcomes (PROs), complication rates, and return to sport (RTS).

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients (147 sQT, 48 bQT) who underwent primary QT ACLR met criteria for analysis, with mean follow-up of 17.0 ± 7.9 months. No difference was detected between cohorts with respect to postoperative IKDC score (sQT: n = 120, 81.0 ± 18.9, bQT: n = 10, 80.9 ± 20.4, n.s.), proportion of patients who met MCID (sQT: 68/78 [87%], bQT: 6/7 [86%], n.s.), or results of stability testing. In the sQT cohort, 86% (106/123) of athletes achieved full RTS, compared to 85% (34/40) in the bQT cohort (n.s.). Time to RTS was less than a year in both cohorts (sQT: 10.5 ± 3.8 months [n = 106], bQT: 11.1 ± 3.9 months [n = 31], n.s.). Graft rupture occurred in 7 (5%) sQT patients and 3 (6%) bQT patients (n.s.), and all clinical failures were due to graft rupture (n.s.). No differences were detected for rates of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

No differences in clinical outcomes were detected between patients who underwent primary ACLR with sQT autograft versus bQT autograft. Currently, the decision to employ sQT or bQT is largely determined by surgeon preference. This study demonstrates excellent outcomes with both preparations and supports the use of either graft type at the discretion of the treating surgeon.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The best type of autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains debatable.

HYPOTHESIS

Compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts, the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has comparable graft survival as well as clinical function and pain outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to July 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting comparisons of QT versus BPTB or HT autografts for ACL reconstruction were included. All analyses were stratified according to study design: RCTs or observational studies.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies were included: 7 RCTs and 17 observational studies. The 7 RCTs included 388 patients, and the 17 observational studies included 19,196 patients. No significant differences in graft failure (P = .36), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score (P = .39), or the side-to-side difference in stability (P = .60) were noted between QT and BPTB autografts. However, a significant reduction in donor site morbidity was noted in the QT group compared with the BPTB group (risk ratio [RR], 0.17 [95% CI, 0.09-0.33]; P < .001). No significant differences in graft failure (P = .57), the IKDC subjective score (P = .25), or the side-to-side stability difference (P = .98) were noted between QT and HT autografts. However, the QT autograft was associated with a significantly lower rate of donor site morbidity than the HT autograft (RR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.93]; P = .02). A similar graft failure rate between the QT and control groups was observed after both early and late full weightbearing, after early and late full range of motion, and after using the QT autograft with a bone plug and all soft tissue QT grafts. However, a significantly lower rate of donor site morbidity was observed in the QT group compared with the control group after both early and late full weightbearing, after early and late full range of motion, and after using the QT autograft with a bone plug and all soft tissue QT grafts. No difference in effect estimates was seen between RCTs and observational studies.

CONCLUSION

The QT autograft had comparable graft survival, functional outcomes, and stability outcomes compared with BPTB and HT autografts. However, donor site morbidity was significantly lower with the QT autograft than with BPTB and HT autografts.

Returning Athletes to Sports Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to discuss treatment options, rehabilitation protocols, return-to-play criteria, and expected outcomes after non-operative and operative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears among an athletic population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Non-operative treatment may be a viable option for some athletes with an ACL tears but can be difficult to predict "copers," and those that resume to sports return at lower performance level and/or less intense activities. Most studies assessing function after ACL reconstruction demonstrate favorable outcomes using patient-reported outcome studies. However, return-to-play and graft re-rupture rates vary substantially based on patient characteristics and level and type of athletic activity. Grafts used to reconstruct ACL produce similar objective outcomes and favorable patient-reported outcomes but have variable re-rupture rates depending on study and differ largely on morbidity associated with graft harvest. Various treatment methods including non-operative and operative techniques have been demonstrated to be efficacious in returning athletes to athletic activity depending on patient age and level of activity. Adherence to fundamental rehabilitation principles and accepted return-to-play guidelines can optimize outcomes and limit re-injury to the injured or contralateral limb.

Closure of the Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Harvest Site for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft is a commonly used and effective graft option for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Surgical techniques vary, and there is no current standard of care for management of the QT autograft harvest site.

PURPOSE

To examine the literature on patient-reported outcomes and complications after ACLR with a QT autograft and to further clarify the frequency with which the harvest site is closed and potential biomechanical implications.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was performed using multiple medical databases. Level 1 to 4 studies on patients undergoing ACLR with a QT autograft were included. There were 2 independent reviewers who analyzed all studies. Study quality was analyzed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies checklist.

RESULTS

Overall, 13 studies with a total of 650 patients were included. The mean patient age for all studies was 31 years (range, 14-59 years) with a mean follow-up of 21.2 months (range, 6-84 months). Of the 13 studies, 12 studies (92%) documented patient sex, comprising 331 female patients (55%) and 274 male patients (45%). There were 8 studies (62%) that reported the use of a bony QT autograft in 273 patients, and 5 studies (38%) reported the use of a soft tissue QT autograft in 377 patients. The graft length harvested was most commonly 7 to 8 cm, while the tendon width harvested was 10 mm. Moreover, 5 studies (38%) did not discuss closure of the harvest site, while 2 studies (15%) only closed the harvest site if a capsular rent was present. The surgical technique for harvest-site closure varied when reported in 7 studies (54%). Good to excellent clinical outcomes were reported in 80% of patients when the harvest site was closed.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this study, there is no consensus on whether the QT defect should be closed after harvesting the graft for ACLR. It has been reported that closure of the harvest site is performed if there is a capsular rent present. Several techniques are utilized to close the QT autograft harvest site; however, it is unclear if there is a difference in outcomes based on the technique used. Future studies should further clarify whether there are any biomechanical and clinical advantages to closing the QT autograft harvest site.

A Comparison of Two-Year Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Clinical Outcomes Using All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft With Femoral/Tibial Cortical Suspensory Fixation Versus Tibial Interference Screw Fixation

PURPOSE

To contribute to future quadriceps tendon harvest and fixation guidelines in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by comparing 2-year patient-reported subjective knee outcome scores and incidence of graft-related complications between the shorter harvest all-inside tibial-femoral suspensory fixation (TFSF) approach versus the longer harvest standard tibial interference screw fixation technique.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with all soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft from January 2017 to May 2019 were identified for inclusion. Patients were matched into 2 cohorts of 62 based on reconstruction technique. All patients completed baseline and minimum 2-year International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner Activity Level, and Lysholm questionnaires and were queried regarding subsequent procedures and complications to the operative knee.

RESULTS

Average graft length for the all-inside TFSF was 69.55 (95% confidence interval 68.99-70.19) mm versus 79.27 (95% confidence interval 77.21-81.34) mm in the tibial screw fixation cohort (P = .00001). Two-year Lysholm scores were greater in the TFSF cohort (P = .04) but were not clinically significant. There was no difference in 2-year International Knee Documentation Committee (P = .09) or Tegner (P = .69) scores between cohorts, but more patients in the TFSF cohort returned to or exceeded their baseline activity level compared with the tibial screw fixation cohort (73% vs 61%, P = .25). Seven patients in the TFSF cohort versus 13 in the tibial screw fixation cohort reported anterior knee pain or kneeling difficulty (P = .22). There were no differences in reported complications.

CONCLUSIONS

All-inside soft-tissue quadriceps tendon autograft with TFSF resulted in clinically comparable subjective outcome scores at 2 years to tibial screw fixation. There were also no differences in complications or reports of anterior knee pain or kneeling difficulty. All-inside TFSF can be a viable alternative to tibial screw fixation for all-soft tissue quadriceps autograft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, comparative therapeutic trial.

Preoperative ultrasound predicts the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft more accurately than preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Sizing of potential autografts is essential to match the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) dimensions when performing ACL reconstruction (ACLR). We aimed to investigate the accuracy and reliability of the thickness and cross-sectional area (CSA) assessments for the prediction of the intraoperative diameter of the QT autograft using preoperative ultrasound and MRI.

METHODS

Thirty patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 19.9 ± 5.0 years), who underwent ACLR using QT autograft, were included. The maximum thickness of the QT was assessed at 15 and 30 mm proximal using ultrasound with a long axis image, and at 15 mm proximal to the superior pole of the patella using MRI with a sagittal image. The CSA was assessed at the central 10 mm of the medial-lateral QT width at 30 mm proximal using ultrasound with a short axis image, and at 15 mm proximal to the superior pole of the patella using MRI with an axial image. Intraoperatively, QT autograft was harvested with a 10 mm width and the diameter was measured using a graft sizing device.

RESULTS

Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of all measurements using ultrasound and MRI were good (Intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.720-0.941). Correlation coefficient with the intraoperative diameter of the QT autograft was higher in ultrasound (R = 0.738-0.791, P < 0.001) than MRI (R = 0.449-0.543, P = 0.002-0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative ultrasound predicted the intraoperative diameter of the QT autograft more accurately than MRI. Ultrasound may be used clinically to assure a sufficiently large QT autograft diameter to match the diameter of the patient's native ACL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Quadricep ACL Reconstruction Techniques and Outcomes: an Updated Scoping Review of the Quadricep Tendon

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date summary on the most recent literature examining techniques and outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using quadriceps tendon (QT) which will enable surgeons to make well informed evidence-based decisions when choosing a particular graft option and technique in ACL reconstruction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several RCTs and systematic reviews have been published recently on this topic, and overall, there were no differences found between the QT, HT, and BPTB groups in patient-reported outcomes, stability testing, or graft re-rupture rates. In terms of strength testing, the QT group did have inferior knee extensor strength on isokinetic testing when compared to the HT group, whereas the HT group had inferior knee flexor strength compared to the QT group. No differences were found on strength testing between the QT and BPTB groups. Currently, two large RCTs, the Stability2 and SQuASH trials, are ongoing examining the effectiveness of the QT vs BPTB with or without LET and QT vs HT in the pediatric population which will help shed further light on the effectiveness of the QT as a graft choice in ACL reconstruction. The findings of this scoping review demonstrate that the QT is an excellent graft option in ACL reconstruction both in the primary and revision settings, among adult and pediatric populations. This review provides surgeons with further assurance when selecting QT autograft in ACL reconstruction.

The impact of graft type on rehabilitation outcomes following ACL reconstruction: Bone patellar tendon bone versus quadriceps tendon grafts

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to 1) compare the dosage of physical therapy provided for patients following an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) with either quadriceps or bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft type and their resulting outcomes and 2) investigate the frequency therapists documented surgical graft type.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational.

SETTING

Outpatient orthopedics.

PARTICIPANTS

Data was collected from the electronic medical records of 212 patients: BPTB (41) and quadriceps tendon (33) were analyzed. Forty-eight cases were other graft types and 90 were unspecified.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

An independent samples t-test was used to compare differences in knee range of motion (ROM) and Knee Functional Status (FS) between BPTB and quadriceps grafts.

RESULTS

There were no differences in knee flexion (p = 0.148) or extension (p = 0.305) ROM between groups at discharge. The quadriceps group achieved greater improvement in functional outcomes (p < 0.001). The quadriceps group received more sessions (p = 0.021) and a longer duration of care (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The significant difference in treatment dosage makes it difficult to conclude which graft is superior. It is unknown if the frequent omission of graft type in the patient chart is an indication of poor documentation practice or a lack of perceived importance in knowing the graft type for PT.

Anterior Cruciate Reconstruction with Quadriceps Autograft using QuadLink Anterior Cruciate Ligament FiberTag TightRope Implant

Quadriceps tendon autografts have been shown to be a reliable option for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The graft allows for optimal functional outcomes while reducing donor site morbidity. Although quadriceps graft fixation can be achieved using a variety of techniques, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal technique. Additionally, femoral fixation techniques have variance in durability and reproducibility. The purpose of this Technical Note and video is to provide our preferred method of quadriceps tendon autograft preparation and fixation using the Quad Link ACL FiberTag TightRope Implant in a single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Age, rehabilitation and surgery characteristics are re-injury risk factors for adolescents following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effect of age on post-ACLR rehabilitative outcomes and identify surgical/rehabilitative characteristics as ACL re-injury risk factors in adolescents.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Children's hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

273 adolescents with first-time ACLR.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Demographics, injury history, surgery, and outcomes documented during post-ACLR physical therapy (PT) sessions were extracted from medical records. Effects of age on outcomes were examined using multivariate regression. ACL re-injury risk factors were identified using survival analysis with Cox regression.

RESULTS

Re-injury was recorded in 47 patients (17.2%) with a median follow-up time of 3.1 years and median re-injury time of 13.4 months post-surgery. Younger age (Hazard-Ratio, HR = 1.264 per year decrease; P = 0.005), receiving surgery within 1 month post-injury (HR = 3.378 vs. >3 months; P = 0.012), starting PT within 3 days post-surgery (HR = 3.068; P = 0.022), and decreased number of PT sessions (HR = 1.118 per 3-session decrease; P = 0.010) increased re-injury risk. Although age was associated with re-injury risk, age was not associated with any outcome (P > 0.059).

CONCLUSION

Adolescents who are younger, receive surgery and post-surgery PT sooner, or attend fewer PT sessions may be at an increased re-injury risk. Younger patients achieved similar outcomes despite elevated re-injury risk. Current discharge criteria are inadequate in identifying high re-injury risk patients.