Glenoid Cartilage Lesions Compromise Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Posterior Shoulder Instability

Arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair grants adequate outcomes in shoulders with posterior instability without glenoid cartilage lesions

INTRODUCTION

Posterior capsulolabral repair (posterior Bankart) is effective to restore shoulder stability and relieve pain, though a recent meta-analysis reported recurrent instability in 9.5% of patients, and that only 62.7% were able to resume sports. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair in a population of unselected patients, in terms of recurrence of instability, clinical scores, and return to sports.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively studied a consecutive series of 22 patients that underwent posterior capsulolabral repair between 2009 and 2019. Patients were assessed before posterior capsulolabral repair and at a minimum follow-up of 24 months, in terms of subjective shoulder value (SSV), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), as well as level of sport. Following surgery, all complications, reoperations or episodes of instability were noted.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 21 men (95%) and 1 woman (5%), aged 38.8 ± 12.5 years (range 17-61) at index surgery. Of the 20 patients that performed sports, only 2 (10%) stopped sports after surgery, while 18 resumed their main sport (90%). At a follow-up of 65.4 ± 34.8 months (range 25-146), the SSV was 85.1 ± 14.7, pain on VAS was 1.9 ± 2.1, and the Constant-Murley score was 71.6 ± 17.9. Five patients had subjective instability without dislocation (23%). Nine patients (41%) had no pain (0 points), 6 patients (27%) had mild pain (1-2 points), 4 patients (18%) had moderate pain (3 points), while 3 patients (14%) had severe pain (5-8 points).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair prevented recurrent dislocation in patients with posterior shoulder instability at a minimum follow-up of 2 years, despite persistent pain in 32%, and subjective instability in 23%. These complications were mainly observed in patients with work-related accidents and glenoid cartilage lesions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, case series.

Favorable short-term outcomes of micronized allogenic cartilage scaffold for glenoid cartilage defects associated with posterior glenohumeral instability

Purpose

To determine clinical outcomes associated with micronized allogenic cartilage scaffold use for treatment of posterior glenoid cartilage defects at 2 years.

Study Design

Case series.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed on a consecutive series of patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment of a symptomatic posterior glenoid cartilage defect with micronized allogenic cartilage scaffold between January 2019 and December 2020. The primary outcome was subjective shoulder value (SSV) at latest follow-up. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS), recurrence of instability, and range of motion (ROM).

Results

Seven patients, including 4 in the setting of primary posterior instability and 3 in the setting of recurrent symptoms after arthroscopic posterior glenohumeral stabilization, were included in the analysis with a mean follow up of 2.6 years (range, 2-3.7 years). Statistically significant improvements were seen in SSV (median = 40, interquartile range [IQR] = 40-50 before surgery; vs median = 85, IQR = 67.5-87.5 after surgery; P = .018) and VAS (median = 4, IQR = 4-6.3 before surgery; vs median = 1, IQR = 0-1.5 after surgery; P = .010). No significant differences were seen in ROM. There were no cases of recurrent instability or reoperation.

Conclusions

The use of micronized allogenic cartilage scaffold for glenoid cartilage defects is associated with clinical improvement at 2-year follow-up. This is the case when performed in conjunction with index posterior labral repair when there is a concomitant glenoid cartilage defect or when performed in the setting of persistent pain and mechanical symptoms after prior posterior labral repair.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

The Cartilage Wear Index: A new evaluation method to improve patient selection in surgical treatment of recurrent posterior glenohumeral instability

Background

The purpose of this study was to validate glenoid cartilage lesions as a negative prognostic factor and to define a new image-based preoperative evaluation method to identify surgical candidates for arthroscopic labral refixation with suture anchors in posterior shoulder instability.

Methods

Twenty-six patients who underwent arthroscopic posterior labral repair for shoulder instability were evaluated. Only patients with structural dynamic posterior instability were included. We evaluated on preoperative magnetic resonance arthrogram: glenoid version, humeral head subluxation, type of capsular insertion, and the cartilage lesions using the new Cartilage Wear Index (CWI). Two subgroups were analyzed with regard to the preoperative CWI and shoulder outcome scores: Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI).

Results

The median age at operation was 28 (interquartile range = 21-33) years. Median overall postoperative outcome assessment demonstrated a SANE of 90 and a WOSI of 385. The median CWI was 1.02. Subgroup analysis revealed worse median WOSI and SANE scores in patients with a CWI >1.02 and a strong correlation between a high preoperative CWI and a higher postoperative WOSI score (R = 0.58; P = .038).

Conclusion

The CWI can be useful to identify patients who might obtain better outcomes when treated with arthroscopic labral repair in posterior shoulder instability.

Three-Year Outcomes After MACI for Glenoid Cartilage Loss in an Adolescent Athlete: A Case Report

CASE

We report the 3-year outcomes of a 14-year-old boy who anteriorly dislocated his shoulder playing football and suffered a 9-cm2 chondral defect of the anterior glenoid and subsequently treated with matrix-applied characterized autologous chondrocytes (MACI) of the defect with open labral repair.

CONCLUSION

The management of glenohumeral chondral lesions in adolescent patients remains a challenge. Our case of the successful treatment of a glenoid chondral defect with MACI offers hope as a potential treatment option for adolescent patients with this challenging problem.

Anterior and posterior glenoid bone augmentation options for shoulder instability: state of the art

Bony lesions are highly prevalent in anterior shoulder instability and can be a significant cause of failure of stabilisation procedures if they are not adequately addressed. The glenoid track concept describes the dynamic interaction between the humeral head and glenoid defects in anterior shoulder instability. It has been beneficial for understanding the role played by bone defects in this entity. As a consequence, the popularity of glenoid augmentation procedures aimed to treat anterior glenoid bone defects; reconstructing the anatomy of the glenohumeral joint has risen sharply in the last decade. Although bone defects are less common in posterior instability, posterior bone block procedures can be indicated to treat not only posterior bony lesions, attritional posterior glenoid erosion or dysplasia but also normal or retroverted glenoids to provide an extended glenoid surface to increase the glenohumeral stability. The purpose of this review was to analyse the rationale, current indications and results of surgical techniques aimed to augment the glenoid surface in patients diagnosed of either anterior or posterior instability by assessing a thorough review of modern literature. Classical techniques such as Latarjet or free bone block procedures have proven to be effective in augmenting the glenoid surface and consequently achieving adequate shoulder stability with good clinical outcomes and early return to athletic activity. Innovations in surgical techniques have permitted to perform these procedures arthroscopically. Arthroscopy provides the theoretical advantages of lower morbidity and faster recovery, as well as the identification and treatment of concomitant pathologies.

Acceptable Long-Term Outcomes of Arthroscopic Bone Grafting for Recurrent Posterior Shoulder Instability: Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years

PURPOSE

To examine the long-term clinical outcome associated with arthroscopically placed autologous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) for recurrent posterior shoulder instability.

METHODS

From January 2008 to December 2013, patients treated with posterior ICBG and a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included. Clinical outcome of patients operated with a posterior ICBG was analyzed with multiple patient-reported outcome measures included Constant (CS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Walch-Duplay, and Rowe scores, shoulder subjective value, and pain visual analog score. Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking the patients their overall level of satisfaction at last follow-up on a 1 to 10 scale.

RESULTS

In total, 18 patients (19 shoulders) were included. At a mean follow-up of 7.3 years (range, 5-10 years), patients had significant improvements in their mean CS from 63 (standard deviation [SD] 18) to 80 (SD 18; P = .005), ASES from 57 (SD 18) to 81 (SD 18; P = .003), Walch-Duplay from 34 (SD 31) to 79 (SD 22; P < .001), and Rowe score from 37 (SD 23) to 79 (SD 24; P < .001). Pain level decreased from 5.6 (SD 2.5) preoperative to 2.3 (SD 2.3; P < .001) and shoulder subjective value improved 58 (SD 20) to 76 (SD 24; P = .002). Global satisfaction with the procedure was 8.4 (SD 2.1). Clinical significance was met or exceeded by 84% for CS and 89% of the patients for ASES and 95% met or exceeded satisfaction threshold for CS. There were 7 shoulders (37%) reoperated for symptomatic screw irritation.

CONCLUSIONS

This series reporting on the long-term follow-up after arthroscopic posterior ICBG for recurrent posterior shoulder instability demonstrates, despite a high number of reoperations for symptomatic screw irritation, its effectiveness with acceptable clinical outcomes and satisfied patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, therapeutic case series.

Restoration of the Posterior Glenoid in Recurrent Posterior Shoulder Instability Using an Arthroscopically Placed Iliac Crest Bone Graft: A Computed Tomography-Based Analysis

Background

Posterior shoulder instability is uncommon, and its treatment is a challenging problem. An arthroscopically assisted technique for posterior iliac crest bone grafting (ICBG) has shown promising short- and long-term clinical results. Changes as shown on imaging scans after posterior ICBG for posterior shoulder instability have not been investigated in the recent literature.

Purpose

To evaluate changes on computed tomography (CT) after arthroscopically assisted posterior ICBG and to assess clinical outcomes.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

Patients with preoperative CT scans and at least 2 postoperative CT scans with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included in the evaluation. Of 49 initial patients, 17 (follow-up rate, 35%) met the inclusion criteria and were available for follow-up. We measured the glenoid version angle and the glenohumeral and scapulohumeral indices on the preoperative CT scans and compared them with measurements on the postoperative CT scans. Postoperatively, graft surface, resorption, and defect coverage were measured and compared with those at early follow-up (within 16 months) and final follow-up (mean ± SD, 6.6 ± 2.8 years).

Results

The mean preoperative glenoid version was -17° ± 13.5°, which was corrected to -9.9° ± 11.9° at final follow-up (P < .001). The humeral head was able to be recentered and reached normal values as indicated by the glenohumeral index (51.8% ± 6%; P = .042) and scapulohumeral index (59.6% ± 10.2%; P < .001) at final follow-up. Graft surface area decreased over the follow-up period, from 24% ± 9% of the glenoid surface at early follow-up to 17% ± 10% at final follow-up (P < .001). All clinical outcome scores had improved significantly. Progression of osteoarthritis was observed in 47% of the shoulders.

Conclusion

Arthroscopically assisted posterior ICBG restored reliable parameters as shown on CT scans, especially glenoid version and the posterior subluxation indices. Graft resorption was common and could be observed in all shoulders. Patient-reported clinical outcome scores were improved. Osteoarthritis progression in almost 50% of patients is concerning for the long-term success of this procedure.