The Effects of Uncertainty in Level on Speech-on-Speech Masking

Effects of presentation level on speech-on-speech masking by voice-gender difference and spatial separation between talkers

Many previous studies have reported that speech segregation performance in multi-talker environments can be enhanced by two major acoustic cues: (1) voice-characteristic differences between talkers; (2) spatial separation between talkers. Here, the improvement they can provide for speech segregation is referred to as "release from masking." The goal of this study was to investigate how masking release performance with two cues is affected by various target presentation levels. Sixteen normal-hearing listeners participated in the speech recognition in noise experiment. Speech-on-speech masking performance was measured as the threshold target-to-masker ratio needed to understand a target talker in the presence of either same- or different-gender masker talkers to manipulate the voice-gender difference cue. These target-masker gender combinations were tested with five spatial configurations (maskers co-located or 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° symmetrically spatially separated from the target) to manipulate the spatial separation cue. In addition, those conditions were repeated at three target presentation levels (30, 40, and 50 dB sensation levels). Results revealed that the amount of masking release by either voice-gender difference or spatial separation cues was significantly affected by the target level, especially at the small target-masker spatial separation (±15°). Further, the results showed that the intersection points between two masking release types (equal perceptual weighting) could be varied by the target levels. These findings suggest that the perceptual weighting of masking release from two cues is non-linearly related to the target levels. The target presentation level could be one major factor associated with masking release performance in normal-hearing listeners.

Individual differences in speech-on-speech masking are correlated with cognitive and visual task performance

Individual differences in spatial tuning for masked target speech identification were determined using maskers that varied in type and proximity to the target source. The maskers were chosen to produce three strengths of informational masking (IM): high [same-gender, speech-on-speech (SOS) masking], intermediate (the same masker speech time-reversed), and low (speech-shaped, speech-envelope-modulated noise). Typical for this task, individual differences increased as IM increased, while overall performance decreased. To determine the extent to which auditory performance might generalize to another sensory modality, a comparison visual task was also implemented. Visual search time was measured for identifying a cued object among "clouds" of distractors that were varied symmetrically in proximity to the target. The visual maskers also were chosen to produce three strengths of an analog of IM based on feature similarities between the target and maskers. Significant correlations were found for overall auditory and visual task performance, and both of these measures were correlated with an index of general cognitive reasoning. Overall, the findings provide qualified support for the proposition that the ability of an individual to solve IM-dominated tasks depends on cognitive mechanisms that operate in common across sensory modalities.

Simultaneous relative cue reliance in speech-on-speech masking

Modern hearing research has identified the ability of listeners to segregate simultaneous speech streams with a reliance on three major voice cues, fundamental frequency, level, and location. Few of these studies evaluated reliance for these cues presented simultaneously as occurs in nature, and fewer still considered the listeners' relative reliance on these cues owing to the cues' different units of measure. In the present study trial-by-trial analyses were used to isolate the listener's simultaneous reliance on the three voice cues, with the behavior of an ideal observer [Green and Swets (1966). (Wiley, New York), pp.151-178] serving as a comparison standard for evaluating relative reliance. Listeners heard on each trial a pair of randomly selected, simultaneous recordings of naturally spoken sentences. One of the recordings was always from the same talker, a distracter, and the other, with equal probability, was from one of two target talkers differing in the three voice cues. The listener's task was to identify the target talker. Among 33 clinically normal-hearing adults only one relied predominantly on voice level, the remaining were split between voice fundamental frequency and/or location. The results are discussed regarding their implications for the common practice in studies of using target-distracter level as a dependent measure of speech-on-speech masking.