High D-dimer plasma concentration in systemic sclerosis patients: Prevalence and association with vascular complications

D-dimer - a multifaceted molecule

D-dimer, a universally unique marker for fibrin degradation, is generated through the enzymatic interplay of thrombin, factor XIIIa, and plasmin. The emergence of D-dimer-containing fibrin molecules occurs in both intravascular and extravascular spaces during pivotal physiological processes like haemostasis, thrombosis, and tissue repair. Given the inherently physiological nature of fibrin formation and fibrinolysis, basal levels of D-dimer fragments are present in plasma. Beyond its role as a marker of routine physiological processes, aberrations in D-dimer levels are indicative of a spectrum of conditions, both non-pathological and pathological. The clinical utility of D-dimer has been firmly established, particularly in scenarios like venous thromboembolism (VTE), pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Additionally, recent applications have extended to assess the prognosis of COVID-19. While D-dimer is commonly associated with thrombotic conditions, its elevation is not confined to these conditions alone. Elevated D-dimer levels are observed across various diseases, where its significance extends beyond diagnostic indicators to prognostic implications.

Is anticoagulative therapy in systemic sclerosis to be reconsidered?

Systemic sclerosis is a rare disease with a high mortality rate. It is a multisystem connective tissue disease due to endothelial autoimmune activation along with tissue and vascular fibrosis, inducing vasculopathy, with an angiogenesis wasting. The endothelial damage provokes platelet activation and immune cell adhesion. The detachment of endothelial cells leads to the interaction of platelets and collagen present in the exposed subendothelial layer. This provokes the activation of several coagulative factors, inducing a pro-thrombotic condition by thrombin generation, which converts fibrinogen into fibrin. Moreover, thrombin has other functions, such as the induction of hyperplasia in smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts, thereby favouring fibrosis. An increased risk of venous thromboembolism has been found in systemic sclerosis, whereas pulmonary hypertension may be due to the obstruction of small pulmonary arteries. Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease may also occur. Warfarin showed inconsistent results, while the outcomes of a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial on apixaban versus placebo are still awaited. A new anticoagulation strategy based on anti-factor XI drugs is being developed, with the aim of achieving optimal anticoagulation along with a low risk of bleeding. The molecule types under investigation in this category include monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, natural inhibitors, antisense oligonucleotides, and aptamers. Patients with systemic sclerosis may be ideal candidates for clinical trials planned to analyse the efficacy and safety of these molecules.

Under the dual effect of inflammation and pulmonary fibrosis, CTD-ILD patients possess a greater susceptibility to VTE

As an autoimmune disease, the persistent systemic inflammatory response associated with connective tissue disease (CTD) is involved in the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, clinical data showed that the risk of VTE in patients differed between subtypes of CTD, suggesting that different subtypes may have independent mechanisms to promote the development of VTE, but the specific mechanism lacks sufficient research at present. The development of pulmonary fibrosis also contributes to the development of VTE, and therefore, patients with CTD-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) may be at higher risk of VTE than patients with CTD alone or patients with ILD alone. In addition, the activation of the coagulation cascade response will drive further progression of the patient's pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis, which will continue to increase the patient's risk of VTE and adversely affect prognosis. Currently, the treatment for CTD-ILD is mainly immunosuppressive and antirheumatic therapy, such as the use of glucocorticoids and janus kinase-inhibitors (JAKis), but, paradoxically, these drugs are also involved in the formation of patients' coagulation tendency, making the clinical treatment of CTD-ILD patients with a higher risk of developing VTE challenging. In this article, we review the potential risk factors and related mechanisms for the development of VTE in CTD-ILD patients to provide a reference for clinical treatment and prevention.

A journey to vasculopathy in systemic sclerosis: focus on haemostasis and thrombosis

Systemic sclerosis is a multisystem connective tissue disease, characterized by endothelial autoimmune activation, along with tissue and vascular fibrosis leading to vasculopathy and to a progressive loss of angiogenesis. This condition further deranges the endothelial barrier favouring the opening of the endothelial junctions allowing the vascular leak in the surrounding tissues: this process may induce cell detachment which allows the contact between platelets and collagen present in the exposed subendothelial layer. Platelets first adhere to collagen via glycoprotein VI and then, immediately aggregate because of the release of von Willebrand factor which is a strong activator of platelet aggregation. Activated platelets exert their procoagulant activity, exposing on their membrane phospholipids and phosphatidylserine, enabling the adsorption of clotting factors ready to form thrombin which in turn drives the amplification of the coagulative cascade. An essential role in the activation of blood coagulation is the tissue factor (TF), which triggers blood coagulation. The TF is found abundantly in the subendothelial collagen and is also expressed by fibroblasts providing a haemostatic covering layer ready to activate coagulation when the endothelial injury occurs. The aim of this review is to focus the attention on the underlying mechanisms related to haemostasis and thrombosis pathophysiology which may have a relevant role in SSc as well as on a possible role of anticoagulation in this disease.

Longitudinal Profiles of Anti-Platelet Factor 4 Antibodies in Thai People Who Received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination

Anti-platelet factor 4 (anti-PF4) antibodies were identified as pathogenic antibodies for vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) in subjects receiving ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinations. We performed a prospective cohort study to determine the prevalence of anti-PF4 and the effect of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine on anti-PF4 in healthy Thai subjects. Anti-PF4 antibodies were measured before and four weeks after receiving the first vaccination. Participants with detectable antibodies were scheduled for repeat anti-PF4 analysis at 12 weeks after the second vaccination. Of 396 participants, ten participants (2.53%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-4.59) were positive for anti-PF4 before receiving vaccinations. Twelve people (3.03%; 95% CI, 1.58-5.23) had detectable anti-PF4 after the first vaccination. There was no difference in the optical density (OD) values of anti-PF4 antibodies when comparisons were made between pre-vaccination and four weeks after the first vaccination (p = 0.0779). There was also no significant difference in OD values in participants with detectable antibodies. No subjects experienced thrombotic complications. Pain at the injection site was associated with an increased risk of being anti-PF4 positive at an odds ratio of 3.44 (95% CI, 1.06-11.18). To conclude, the prevalence of anti-PF4 was low in Thais and did not significantly change over time.

Venous Thromboembolism in the Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a cardiovascular event whose risk is increased in most inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). Mechanisms that increase VTE risk include antiphospholipid antibodies (APLs), particularly anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta2glycoprotein I antibodies and lupus anticoagulant present together, and inflammation-mediated endothelial injury. Patients with IRDs should receive long-term anticoagulation drugs when the risk of VTE recurrence is high. In the light of recent warnings from regulatory agencies regarding heightened VTE risk with Janus kinase inhibitors, these drugs should be initiated only after a careful assessment of VTE risk in those with IRDs.

Prognostic molecular biomarkers in chordomas: A systematic review and identification of clinically usable biomarker panels

Introduction and objective

Despite the improvements in management and treatment of chordomas over time, the risk of disease recurrence remains high. Consequently, there is a push to develop effective systemic therapeutics for newly diagnosed and recurrent disease. In order to tailor treatment for individual chordoma patients and develop effective surveillance strategies, suitable clinical biomarkers need to be identified. The objective of this study was to systematically review all prognostic biomarkers for chordomas reported to date in order to classify them according to localization, study design and statistical analysis.

Methods

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically reviewed published studies reporting biomarkers that correlated with clinical outcomes. We included time-to-event studies that evaluated biomarkers in skull base or spine chordomas. To be included in our review, the study must have analyzed the outcomes with univariate and/or multivariate methods (log-rank test or a Cox-regression model).

Results

We included 68 studies, of which only 5 were prospective studies. Overall, 103 biomarkers were analyzed in 3183 patients. According to FDA classification, 85 were molecular biomarkers (82.5%) mainly located in nucleus and cytoplasm (48% and 27%, respectively). Thirty-four studies analyzed biomarkers with Cox-regression model. Within these studies, 32 biomarkers (31%) and 22 biomarkers (21%) were independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS, respectively.

Conclusion

Our analysis identified a list of 13 biomarkers correlating with tumor control rates and survival. The future point will be gathering all these results to guide the clinical validation for a chordoma biomarker panel. Our identified biomarkers have strengths and weaknesses according to FDA's guidelines, some are affordable, have a low-invasive collection method and can be easily measured in any health care setting (RDW and D-dimer), but others molecular biomarkers need specialized assay techniques (microRNAs, PD-1 pathway markers, CDKs and somatic chromosome deletions were more chordoma-specific). A focused list of biomarkers that correlate with local recurrence, metastatic spread and survival might be a cornerstone to determine the need of adjuvant therapies.