Incidence and Risk of Scleral-Fixated Akreos (AO60) Lens Opacification: A Case Series

Long-Term Outcomes of Scleral-Sutured Fixated Secondary Intraocular Lenses in Patients With Uveitis

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the long-term outcomes of scleral-sutured fixated intraocular lenses (SSIOLs) in patients with uveitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective, consecutive review of uveitis patients with SSIOL fixation from January 2017 to December 2020. SSIOL techniques included four-point fixation with the Akreos A060 or enVista MX60 (Bausch + Lomb) lens, or Hoffman's pockets rescue.

RESULTS

Thirteen eyes of 13 patients received an SSIOL (9 AO60, 2 MX60, 2 Hoffman's pockets). Diagnoses included pan- (9), anterior (2), and posterior uveitis (2). Average LogMAR best-corrected visual acuity pre- and postoperatively was 1.01 (Snellen ∼20/200) and 0.50 (Snellen ∼20/60), respectively (P = 0.003). No patients had postoperative SSIOL dislocation or conjunctival suture erosion. Six patients (46%) had uveitis flares postoperatively. Average follow-up was 50.2 months (range = 36.8 to 67.5).

CONCLUSION

This series demonstrates a 0% dislocation and suture exposure rate. Risks of uveitis flares postoperatively are high despite aggressive perioperative control but are manageable with current treatments; therefore, patients must be continually monitored. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:443-447.].

FIL SSF intraocular lens opacification after pars plana vitrectomy with gas tamponade for traumatic lens luxation and retinal detachment: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

To report a case of sutureless scleral-fixated hydrophilic intraocular lens (FIL SSF IOL, Soleko, Italy) opacification following pars plana vitrectomy surgery using sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) for traumatic lens luxation associated with retinal detachment.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 77-year-old woman was referred to our emergency department after blunt trauma in her right eye. At the ophthalmic evaluation, visual acuity was hand movement, biomicroscopy showed pseudoexfoliation syndrome and a traumatic lens luxation in the vitreous chamber. The patient underwent pars plana vitrectomy, subluxated cataract explantation, and FIL SSF IOL implant. During surgery, an inferior retinal detachment was encountered, requiring 20% SF6 gas tamponade. No adverse events were encountered. One month postoperatively, visual acuity (BCVA) improved to 0,3 logMAR. At the 3-month follow-up, the patient presented with BCVA of 0,5 logMAR, and biomicroscopy showed a minimal IOL opacification. Six months postoperatively, BCVA decreased to 1.0 logMAR, and diffuse, IOL opacification was noted at slit lamp examination. The patient refused any other surgical intervention for IOL exchange.

CONCLUSIONS

Although hydrophilic IOL opacification gas related is known, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reported in the literature of FIL SSF IOL opacification after pars plana vitrectomy with gas tamponade for retinal detachment.

Imaging Function and Relative Light Transmission of Explanted Opacified Hydrophilic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses

We evaluated the influence of intraocular lens (IOL) opacification on the optical performance of explanted hydrophilic acrylic IOLs. We performed a laboratory analysis of 32 Lentis LS-502-1 (Oculentis GmbH, Berlin, Germany) IOLs, explanted due to opacification, in comparison with six clear unused samples of the same IOL model. Using an optical bench setup, we obtained modulation transfer function (MTF), Strehl ratio, two-dimensional MTF, and United States Air Force (USAF) chart images. In addition, we assessed light transmission through the IOLs. The MTF values of opacified IOLs at 3-mm aperture were similar to those of clear lenses, with the median (interquartile range) values of 0.74 (0.01) vs. 0.76 (0.03) at the spatial frequency of 50 line pairs per millimeter in clear and opacified IOLs, respectively. The Strehl ratio of opacified lenses was not lower than that of clear lenses. The USAF-chart analysis showed a considerable reduction in brightness in opacified IOLs. The median (interquartile range) relative light transmission of opacified IOLs in comparison to clear lenses was 55.6% (20.8%) at the aperture size of 3 mm. In conclusion, the explanted opacified IOLs had comparable MTF values to those of clear lenses but significantly reduced light transmission.

Should We Abandon Hydrophilic Intraocular Lenses?

PURPOSE

To characterize the features of hydrophilic intraocular lenses (IOLs) important in the clinical context of expected prolonged duration time of the IOL within the eye.

DESIGN

Perspective.

METHODS

Discussion includes possible factors and mechanisms associated with hydrophilic IOLs' susceptibility to calcification and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) formation.

RESULTS

Results of recently reported studies show that particular surgeries, such as pars plana vitrectomy, Descemet stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty, and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with intraocular gas or air injection, might predispose the calcification process of hydrophilic IOLs, leading to a significant decrease in visual quality and possibly explantation of the IOL. Hydrophilic IOLs are more susceptible than hydrophobic IOLs to PCO formation, which is the most common of late postoperative complications that are associated with significant side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that all patients should be informed about the higher risk of calcification and PCO associated with hydrophilic IOLs. We also recommend limiting the use of hydrophilic acrylic IOLs during cataract surgery, especially when it is combined with pars plana vitrectomy or endothelial keratoplasty, and in patients with endothelial diseases who will probably require operation on it in the future.