Long-term management of non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion with fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant 190 μg (ILUVIEN®)

Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Uveitis: Dissecting Responder and Non-Responder Outcomes at a Tertiary Center

Macular edema (ME) remains a primary cause of visual deterioration in uveitis. Visual acuity (VA) can often be maintained using corticosteroid depot systems. This study evaluated the efficacy of a fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN®) in treating non-infectious uveitis using real-world data. This retrospective analysis included 135 eyes subdivided into responders and non-responders. Central retinal thickness (CRT), VA, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were followed over time. A significant decrease in CRT and an increase in VA were observed in all eyes throughout the follow-up period (p < 0.01). An IOP increase (p = 0.028) necessitated treatment in 43% of eyes by Month 6. Non-responders were older (p = 0.004) and had been treated with more dexamethasone (DEX) implants (p = 0.04); 89.3% had a defect in the external limiting membrane (ELM) and inner/outer segment (IS/OS) zone (p < 0.001). Immunomodulatory therapy had no impact on treatment response. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) patients had a mean CRT reduction of 47.55 µm and a reduced effect by Month 24 (p = 0.046) versus non-PPV patients. We conclude that the FAc implant achieves long-term control of CRT and improves VA. Increases in IOP were manageable. Eyes with a previous PPV showed milder results. Data showed a correlation between older age, a damaged ELM and IS/OS zone, frequent DEX inserts, and poorer outcome measures.

Novel pharmaceuticals for the management of retinal vein occlusion and linked disorders

INTRODUCTION

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second leading cause of blindness from retinal vascular disease behind diabetic retinopathy. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and glucocorticoid therapy are the cornerstones of pharmaceutical treatment for RVO. There is considerable interest in developing new pharmaceuticals in and out of these two classes to reduce costs, lower injection burden, and treat the occlusion itself, rather than the complications.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss novel pharmaceuticals for the treatment of RVO outside of current standard of care. We performed a comprehensive literature search encompassing pharmaceuticals that have recently been approved or have shown promising results in early clinical trials or animal models.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-VEGF therapy remains the most efficacious treatment for RVO with a very favorable side effect profile. New biosimilars reduce costs while maintaining efficacy. Novel glucocorticoids may be a useful therapy in patients for whom anti-VEGF therapy has failed, or as an adjunct. Pharmaceuticals in other drug classes, particularly those with neuroprotective or regenerative properties, as well as those geared toward treating the occlusion itself, represent exciting options for early RVO therapy, but are likely years away from clinical relevance.

Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant (ILUVIEN®) for the Treatment of Retinal Conditions. A Review of Clinical Studies

Fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (Iluvien®) is a corticosteroid implant indicated for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) in patients who have previously received conventional treatment without good response, non-infectious posterior uveitis, and as an off-label treatment of the macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. FAc is a non-biodegradable 0.19 mg intravitreal implant which is designed to release FAc over 3 years at a rate of approximately 0.2 mcg per day. The aim of this review is to describe the special pharmacological properties of Iluvien and display the outcomes of the most important clinical trials and real-world studies regarding its efficacy and safety for the management of the above retinal disorders.

Intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant for chronic postoperative cystoid macular edema - two years results

PURPOSE

We report visual and anatomical outcomes of chronic postoperative macular edema treated with a fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant.

METHOD

Retrospective study of chronic, post-surgical CME treated with a fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant. Best registered visual acuity (BRVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and Goldmann tonometry intraocular pressure (IOP) were assessed over 24 months. The need for IOP lowering treatment, top-up therapy during follow-up, and complications were also assessed.

RESULTS

We analyzed 16 consecutive eyes of 16 patients with chronic, post-surgical CME treated with fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant. Surgical indications included cataract surgery, vitrectomy plus membrane peeling and combined phaco-vitrectomy. Baseline mean BRVA of 0.8 ± 0.65 logMAR improved to 0.60 ± 0.4 logMAR (p = 0.02) at 12 months and to 0.7 ± 0.5 logMAR (p = 0.32) at 24 months. At month 12, BRVA improved in 11 eyes, stabilized in 4 eyes, and decreased in 1 eye. At month 24, VA remained improved in 5 eyes, remained stabilized in 5 eyes, and decreased in 1 eye. Mean CRT decreased from 524 ± 132 μm at baseline to 389 μm at month 3, 347 μm at month 6, 355 ± 106 μm (p = 0.0003) at month 12, and 313 ± 83 μm (p = 0.0001) at month 24. At 12 months, CRT improved in 13 eyes and remained unchanged in 2 eyes. At 24 months, CRT improved further in 8 eyes, and stabilized in 3 eyes. Increased IOP (≥21 mmHg) was observed only in 4 eyes, all successfully managed with topical medication. No further side effects were observed in any patient.

CONCLUSION

Visual and anatomic improvements were achieved by a single fluocinolone acetonide implant with few side effects up to 24 months in CME eyes with a long and heavy prior treatment history.

Noninvasive monitoring of suprachoroidal, subretinal, and intravitreal implants using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (cSLO) and optical coherence tomography (OCT)

To address the need for noninvasive monitoring of injectable preformed drug delivery implants in the eye, we developed noninvasive methods to monitor such implants in different locations within the eye. Cylindrical polymeric poly(lactide-co-glycolide) or metal implants were injected into isolated bovine eyes at suprachoroidal, subretinal, and intravitreal locations and imaged noninvasively using the cSLO and OCT modes of a Heidelberg Spectralis HRA + OCT instrument after adjusting for the corneal curvature. Length and diameter of implants were obtained using cSLO images for all three locations, and the volume was calculated. Additionally, implant volume for suprachoroidal and subretinal location was estimated by integrating the cross-sectional bleb area over the implant length in multiple OCT images or using the maximum thickness of the implant based on thickness map along with length in cSLO image. Simultaneous cSLO and OCT imaging identified implants in different regions of the eye. Image-based measurements of implant dimensions mostly correlated well with the values prior to injection using blade micrometer. The accuracy (82-112%) and precision (1-19%) for noninvasive measurement of length was better than the diameter (accuracy 69-130%; precision 3-38%) using cSLO image for both types of implants. The accuracy for the measurement of volume of both types of implants from all three intraocular locations was better with cSLO imaging (42-152%) compared to those obtained using OCT cross-sectional bleb area integration (117-556%) or cSLO and thickness map (32-279%) methods. Suprachoroidal, subretinal, and intravitreal implants can be monitored for length, diameter, and volume using cSLO and OCT imaging. Such measurements may be useful in noninvasively monitoring implant degradation and drug release in the eye.

Off-Label Use of 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant: A Systematic Review

Corticosteroids are used in a variety of ophthalmological diseases. One challenge faced by ophthalmologists is to deliver corticosteroids to the posterior segment of the eye with efficacy and safety. Sustained-release corticosteroid implants may be the answer to this problem. The 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant (Iluvien®) releases FAc for 36 months, and it is approved for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and noninfectious uveitis. We decided to do a systematic review to acknowledge in which other diseases FAc implant is being used off-label. A literature search was performed in the following three electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (from January 1^st, 2000, to September 20^th, 2020), using the following query: (“Fluocinolone Acetonide” OR Iluvien®) AND (“eye” OR “ocular” OR “intravitreal).” A total of 11 papers were included, and the use of FAc implant was analyzed in the following diseases: radiation-induced maculopathy (RM); paraneoplastic visual syndromes (melanoma-associated retinopathy (MAR) and cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR)); Sjogren's syndrome-related keratopathy; retinal vein occlusion (RVO); cystoid macular edema (CME); diabetic retinal neurodegeneration (DRN); and retinitis pigmentosa (RP). FAc implant may be a potential treatment for these diseases; however, the level of scientific evidence of the included studies in this review is limited. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-ups are needed to validate this data.

Efficacy and safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with retinal vein occlusion resistant to anti-VEGF therapy: a 12-month prospective study

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeated intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) injections administrated on an "as-needed" protocol for retinal vein occlusion patients with macular oedema, previously subjected to at least five anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections with poor or no response. Methods: Prospective interventional case series of 13 branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and 10 central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) patients with persistent macular oedema (>250 μm) after at least five anti-VEGF injections. Exclusion criteria included: baseline visual acuity worse than 1.5 logMAR, previous intravitreal implant, history of vitreoretinal surgery, manifest glaucoma or ocular hypertension, epiretinal membrane, retinal neovascularization, massive retinal or macular ischaemia, vitreous haemorrhage or severe lens opacity, previous laser photocoagulation treatment. Each patient received an initial intraocular dexamethasone implant and the procedure was repeated at 6 months "as needed." Patients were followed up at months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 with spectral domain optical coherence tomography and best corrected visual acuity measurements. Exclusion criteria included: baseline visual acuity worse than 1.5 logMAR, previous intravitreal implant, history of vitreoretinal surgery, manifest glaucoma or ocular hypertension, epiretinal membrane, retinal neovascularization, retinal or macular ischaemia, vitreous haemorrhage or severe lens opacity, previous laser photocoagulation treatment. Patients on topical or systemic corticosteroid therapy (during the last 3 months), and known steroid responders as well as diabetic patients were also excluded. Results: In the BRVO group, the mean central retinal thickness (CRT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly improved from 482.92 ± 139.99 μm (0.55 ± 0.12 logMAR) at baseline, to 369.31 ± 119.72 μm (0.43 ± 0.18 logMAR) at 6 months (p = 0.011/p = 0.019). At 12 months CRT was 295.82 ± 135.48 μm (p = 0.026) and BCVA 0.29 ± 0.17 logMAR (p = 0.002). Minimum CRT values were achieved at 3.45 months after the first injection, and 2.46 months after the second injection (197.00 ± 84.27 and 180.00 ± 76.89 μm, respectively). Best BCVA values were achieved at a mean of 4 ± 0.853 months after the first injection, and 4 months after the second injection (0.219 ± 0.129 and 0.222 ± 0.078 logMAR, respectively). In the CRVO group, neither the mean CRT nor BCVA improved significantly at 6 months: from 669.70 ± 203.20 μm (0.80 ± 0.231 logMAR) at baseline, to 586.20 ± 237.63 μm (0.740 ± 0.268 logMAR) at 6 months (p = 0.131/p = 0.333). At 12 months CRT was significantly improved: 549.90 ± 191.26 μm (p = 0.047), but BCVA lacked significant improvement: 0.690 ± 0.285 logMAR (p = 0.072). Minimum CRT values were achieved at a mean of 2 months after the first injection, and also 2 months after the second injection (261.60 ± 121.31 and 280.00 ± 177.43 μm, respectively). Best BCVA values were achieved at a mean of 2 months after the first injection, and 2 months after the second injection and were 0.390 ± 0.173 and 0.385 ± 0.233 logMAR, respectively. Cataract progression was a rare event (2/23 eyes), while transient steroid-induced ocular hypertension (5/23 eyes) was managed successfully with IOP-lowering medication Conclusion: Dexamethasone implant should be considered as an effective and safe alternative in patients with BRVO and CRVO who have failed anti-VEGF therapy. Shortening the re-injection interval especially for CRVO cases should be considered.