Comparing the Outcomes of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam-Based and Non-Cefoperazone/Sulbactam-Based Therapeutic Regimens in Patients with Multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections-A Meta-Analysis

The addition of sulbactam restores the complete range of cefoperazone activity against bacteria and extends its spectrum of action to include the Acinetobacter species. The effectiveness of cefoperazone/sulbactam against multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii has not been investigated. The purpose of the current meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of cefoperazone/sulbactam-based therapeutic regimens and non-cefoperazone/sulbactam-based therapeutic regimens in the treatment of multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections. The current meta-analysis of 10 retrospective studies provides evidence that cefoperazone/sulbactam-based therapeutic regimens are superior to non-cefoperazone/sulbactam-based therapeutic regimens in terms of 30-day mortality and clinical improvement in patients with multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections. The risk of mortality was reduced by 38% among multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections in patients who received cefoperazone/sulbactam-based therapeutic regimens. The cefoperazone/sulbactam-based combination therapy was superior to the cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy in terms of 30-day mortality when both therapeutic regimens were compared to the tigecycline monotherapy in patients with multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections.

Eravacycline -Synergistic activity with other antimicrobials in carbapenem resistant isolates of Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter baumannii

Carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae are unaffected by most used antibiotics. Carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacterial isolates poses a concern. Eravacycline is a potent new therapy option to treat organisms that exhibit extended-spectrum -lactamases and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. The chequerboard microdilution panel method was used to evaluate the effectiveness of eravacycline when combined with other antibiotics. Most effective against Escherichia coli isolates was the combination of eravacycline and polymyxin B, with 60% synergism and eravacycline-Ceftazidime combination was the most potent combination against Acinetobacter baumannii with 80% synergism. Eravacycline is having synergistic benefits against carbapenem-resistant isolates when combined with cephalosporins or polymyxin B.

Intra-abdominal infection after tumor surgery: tigecycline combined with β-lactam antibiotics versus tigecycline alone

BACKGROUNDS

Tigecycline has a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity and has been approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. However, it is debatable whether tigecycline should be used alone or in combination. This study aimed to investigate whether tigecycline plus β-lactam antibiotics (combination therapy [CT] group) are superior to tigecycline alone (monotherapy [MT] group) in non-critically ill intra-abdominal infection patients after tumor surgery.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was mortality during the hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were clinical success rate, microbial eradication rate, relapse rate within one week, course of treatment, and adverse effects. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust the degree of infection before medication between the MT and CT groups. Univariate comparisons were performed using the chi-squared test for qualitative variables and Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables, as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between antimicrobial treatments and mortality during hospitalization. The paired samples Wilcoxon test was used to compare the parameters before and after medication.

RESULTS

In total, 291 patients were included in the final analysis: 128 in MT group and 163 in CT group. Mortality rate was 6.25% in the MT group and 6.13% in the CT group (P = 0.97). Multivariate logistic regression model showed that carbapenem-resistant organisms (OR: 4.35, 95% CI: 2.36 ~ 61.70) and age > 65 (OR: 1.32, 95% CI:1.19 ~ 3.01) were independent risk factors for death. CT group had a shorter defervescence time (P < 0.05), with less likelihood of relapse (P < 0.05) but had a more significant effect on activated partial thromboplastin and prothrombin time.

CONCLUSIONS

Tigecycline plus β-lactam wasn't superior to tigecycline monotherapy for the treatment of non-critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection. But for advanced age patients with cancer, tigecycline combination therapy maybe a better choice in terms of mortality.

Synergism of eravacycline combined with other antimicrobial agents against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumannii

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the synergistic activity of eravacycline combined with other antimicrobial agents against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumannii collected from China.

METHODS

Sixty carbapenem-resistant strains, including 20 Escherichia coli, 20 Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 20 Acinetobacter baumannii were investigated for the synergy analysis. Imipenem, ceftazidime, cefoperazone-sulbactam, ciprofloxacin, amikacin, and polymyxin B were selected to investigate their efficacy in combination with eravacycline against 60 carbapenem-resistant strains. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the drugs were determined by broth microdilution method. The efficacy of eravacycline in combination with these agents was determined by the chequerboard method.

RESULTS

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed that polymyxin B was most effective against all carbapenem-resistant strains, with resistance rates between 0% and 15%. Eravacycline showed potent activity against E. coli with an 85% susceptibility rate, and may also have activity against K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii with low MIC₉₀ values. The chequerboard method showed that eravacycline-polymyxin B was the most effective combination against E. coli and K. pneumoniae, with more than 30% synergy. The most active combination against A. baumannii was eravacycline-ceftazidime and eravacycline-imipenem, which showed synergy in more than 50% of isolates.

CONCLUSION

Eravacycline combined with β-lactams or polymyxin B can lead to synergistic effects against clinically common carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The synergistic effects of eravacycline-based combinations varied in different species. A combination of eravacycline and polymyxin B may be considered for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae; eravacycline in combination with ceftazidime or a carbapenem antimicrobial may be considered for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro efficacy of antibiotic combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli

The superiority of combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) infections remains controversial. In vitro models may predict the efficacy of antibiotic regimens against CR-GNB. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed including pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and time-kill (TK) studies examining the in vitro efficacy of antibiotic combinations against CR-GNB [PROSPERO registration no. CRD42019128104]. The primary outcome was in vitro synergy based on the effect size (ES): high, ES ≥ 0.75, moderate, 0.35 < ES < 0.75; low, ES ≤ 0.35; and absent, ES = 0). A network meta-analysis assessed the bactericidal effect and re-growth rate (secondary outcomes). An adapted version of the ToxRTool was used for risk-of-bias assessment. Over 180 combination regimens from 136 studies were included. The most frequently analysed classes were polymyxins and carbapenems. Limited data were available for ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam. High or moderate synergism was shown for polymyxin/rifampicin against Acinetobacter baumannii [ES = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-1.00], polymyxin/fosfomycin against Klebsiella pneumoniae (ES = 1.00, 95% CI 0.66-1.00) and imipenem/amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ES = 1.00, 95% CI 0.21-1.00). Compared with monotherapy, increased bactericidal activity and lower re-growth rates were reported for colistin/fosfomycin and polymyxin/rifampicin in K. pneumoniae and for imipenem/amikacin or imipenem/tobramycin against P. aeruginosa. High quality was documented for 65% and 53% of PK/PD and TK studies, respectively. Well-designed in vitro studies should be encouraged to guide the selection of combination therapies in clinical trials and to improve the armamentarium against carbapenem-resistant bacteria.

Bloodstream infections caused by ST2 Acinetobacter baumannii: risk factors, antibiotic regimens, and virulence over 6 years period in China

Background

Bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR-AB) has been increasingly observed among hospitalized patients. The following study analyzed the epidemiology and microbiological characteristics of MDR-AB, as well as the clinical features, antimicrobial treatments, and outcomes in patients over a six years period in China.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted in a large tertiary hospital in China between January 2013 and December 2018. The clinical and microbiological data of all consecutive hospitalized patients with MDR-AB induced bloodstream infection were included and analyzed.

Results

A total of 108 BSI episodes were analyzed. All MDR isolates belonged to ST2, a sequence type that has spread all over the world. Overall, ST2 strains showed strong biofilm formation ability, high serum resistance, and high pathogenicity. As for the clinical characteristics of the patient, 30-day mortality was 69.4% (75/108). The three main risk factors included mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and thrombocytopenia; three protective factors included a change of antimicrobial regimen within 48 h after positive blood culture, use of the antibacterial agent combination, and more inpatient days. The most effective antibacterial regimen was the combination of cefoperazone/sulbactam and tigecycline.

Conclusions

BSI caused by ST2 A.baumannii represents a difficult challenge for physicians, considering the high mortality associated with this infection. The combination of cefoperazone/sulbactam and tigecycline may be an effective treatment option.

Cefoperazone/sulbactam: New composites against multiresistant gram negative bacteria?

Sulbactam, a class A β-lactamase inhibitor, added to cefoperazone either at a fixed 8 mg/L level of sulbactam or at a level of fixed cefoperazone: sulbactam ratio (2:1) would constitute a combination form of cefoperazone/sulbactam, which has better activities against Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii than cefoperazone alone. Cefoperazone/sulbactam (1:1 or 1:2) has greater in-vitro activity against most multidrug-resistant organisms (ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii except for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa) than a 2:1 ratio. However, increased sulbactam concentration may induce AmpC production. Besides, sulbactam concentration might not be readily achievable in serum if the susceptibility rates were defined by the breakpoints of higher sulbactam composites, such as ≤16/16 (1:1) or 16/32 (1:2) mg/L. Carbapenemases (KPC-, OXA-type enzymes and metallo-β-lactamases) can't be inhibited by sulbactam. Some in-vitro studies showed that increasing sulbactam composites of cefoperazone/sulbactam had no effect on carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, suggesting the presence of carbapenemases or AmpC overproduction that could not be overcome by increasing sulbactam levels to recover cefoperazone activity. Sulbactam alone has good intrinsic activity against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter strains sometimes even in the presence of carbapenemase genes, suggesting unsteady levels of carbapenemases. In conclusion, appropriate composites of cefoperazone and β-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam may expand the clinical use if the pharmacokinetic optimization could be achieved in the human serum.

High-Dose Tigecycline in Elderly Patients with Pneumonia Due to Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Intensive Care Unit

Purpose

The association between clinical and microbiological outcomes and high-dose tigecycline (TGC) was assessed in elderly (≥60 years old) patients with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Acinetobacterbaumannii(A. baumannii). This study also assessed tigecycline combination with different antibiotics and its influence on the outcome.

Patients and Methods

An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients over 60 years old were treated with standard-dose (SD) TGC (100-mg intravenous TGC initially, followed by 50-mg doses administered intravenously twice daily) and high-dose (HD) TGC (200-mg intravenous TGC initially, followed by 100-mg doses administered intravenously twice daily) for a microbially confirmed infection. The outcome was 30-day crude mortality, co-administered antimicrobial agent and the microbial eradication percentage in both groups.

Results

A total of 48 multidrug-resistant A. baumannii respiratory patients were identified. Tigecycline was administered to 85% of ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP) patients (28/33) in the SD group and 80% of VAP patients (12/15) in the HD group. Combined therapy was the major treatment option in both groups, accounting for 85% and 87%, respectively. Median treatment duration in both groups was 7.36 vs 8.6 days, respectively. Survival days were 13.61 vs 12.4 days (P=0.357), respectively. The 30-day crude mortality was 39.4% (13/33) for the SD group and 14% (2/15) for the HD group (P=0.098). The microbial eradication rate of respiratory specimens in the SD group was higher than that in the HD group (P=0.02). The variables associated with 30-day crude mortality were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (hazard ratio [HR] 11.63, 95% CI 1.094–123.058; P=0.042), tigecycline treatment duration (HR 0.690, 95% CI 0.515–0.926; P=0.013), and surgery before infection (HR 79.276, 95% CI 6.983–899.979; P=0.000). High-dose tigecycline was not associated with 30-day crude mortality (adjusted HR 0.329, 95% CI 0.074–1.460; P=0.145). Combined antibiotics was also not different between the two groups.

Conclusions

High-dose tigecycline was not associated with 30-day crude mortality in elderly patients with pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant A. baumannii, although the microbial eradication rate was high.

In vitro interactions of ambroxol hydrochloride or amlodipine in combination with antibacterial agents against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

The aim of this study was to investigate the in vitro interactions of ambroxol hydrochloride (ABH) or amlodipine (AML) with commonly used antibacterial agents, including meropenem, imipenem-cilastatin sodium, biapenem, cefoperazone-sulbactam, polymyxin B, and tigecycline, against six carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) clinical isolates. Drug interactions were interpreted using two models, that is, the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) model and the percentage of growth difference (ΔE) model. The results show that a majority of the combination groups exhibited partial synergy and additive interactions, such as the combinations of carbapenems and cefoperazone-sulbactam (SCF) with ABH or AML. While the combination of PB/AML exhibited synergistic interactions against all tested isolates, and PB/ABH exhibited synergistic interactions against two isolates. The FICI and ΔE model correlated very well for the combinations of PBABH and PB/AML against AB2. The combinations of TGC with ABH or AML mainly exhibited additive and indifferent interactions. There were no antagonistic interactions observed in any of the combinations. In conclusion, this study revealed that the non-antibacterial agents ABH or AML can work synergistically or partial synergistically with antibacterial agents against CRAB. This finding is crucial for overcoming the carbapenem resistance of A. baumannii. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Drug combination is an effective approach for the treatment of resistant bacterial infection. The significance of using drug combination is that it can reduce drug dosage requirements, reduce the toxic effects of agents and prevent or delay the emergence of drug resistance. This study measured the in vitro interactions between non-antimicrobial agents and antibacterial agents against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and the results of this study provide new insight to find strategies to overcome the carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii.

Extensive drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a comparative study between non-colistin based combinations

Background The Gastrointestinal Surgery Center (GISC)-Mansoura University, faced a series of extensive drug resistant (XDR) A. baumannii cases, that were microbiologically resistant to penicillins, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, carbapenems and tigecycline. Colistin would have been a last resort therapy in such situation, however, intravenous polymyxins E (colistin) is relatively unavailable in Egypt. Many practitioners tried to form antibiotic combinations from the available antibiotics to overcome the resistance mechanisms of the pathogen. Objective Evaluate the clinical outcomes of these combinations retrospectively. Setting The study took place at the GISC, which is an academic specialized center affiliated with Mansoura University-Egypt. Method Clinical data were collected from the patients' files, where the subjects were classified into two major groups according to the therapeutic intervention. Group 1 included 24 patients divided into 4 subgroups. The first was treated by a Cephalosporin with a Fluoroquinolone (1A), The second was treated by a Carbapenem with a Fluoroquinolone (1B), The third was treated by a B-lactam with an Aminoglycoside (1C) and the fourth was treated by Carbapenem with a Glycylcycline (1D). Group 2 included 6 patients, treated with Tigecycline and Ampicillin-Sulbactam. Main outcome measure Primary outcomes are the A. baumannii microbiological culture negativity after 14 days of therapy and the 30 days' survival after the antibiotic course, while the secondary outcomes are the expected therapies' side effects. Results Group 2 is associated with significant higher primary outcomes without a significant difference regarding the secondary outcomes. Conclusion The combination of Tigecycline and Ampicillin-Sulbactam, appears to be a clinically effective therapy against XDR A. baumannii, despite each agent being resistant alone, without alerting adverse effects.

Preliminary experience of tigecycline treatment in critically ill children with ventilator-associated pneumonia

Objective

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a life-threatening complication for children who are treated in a paediatric intensive care unit. Tigecycline treatment of children with VAP has not been well studied. This study aimed to describe tigecycline use in children with VAP in a tertiary care hospital.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective chart review in a tertiary hospital from May 1, 2012 to May 1, 2017.

Results

Twenty-four children (20 girls) with median age of 8 months (range, 27 days to 6 years and 9 months) were treated with tigecycline. In-hospital mortality was 41.7% (10/24). The primary diagnosis was congenital heart disease (15/24). A total of 70.8% (17/24) of patients received a loading dose (1.5 mg/kg), followed by 1 mg/kg every 12 hours. The median duration of tigecycline therapy was 10.75 days (range, 3–21.5 days). Sulperazone was the most frequently used concomitant antibiotic. Eighteen pathogens were isolated in 16 cases. Tigecycline therapy failed in 41.6% (10/24) of patients and 20.8% (5/24) died. The pathogen was eradicated in 37.5% (6/16) of patients. No serious adverse effects were detected.

Conclusion

Tigecycline combined with other agents as salvage therapy in children with VAP is well tolerated. Our preliminary results show a positive clinical response.

In vitro assessment of cefoperazone-sulbactam based combination therapy for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in China

Background

Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDRAB) has emerged as an important pathogen of nosocomial infections. Even though cefoperazone-sulbactam is frequently used to treat MDRAB infections, this single-drug therapeutic approach often results in antibiotic resistance. Thus, combination therapy is preferred over single-drug therapy, particularly in the case of carbapenemase-producing gram negative bacteria. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of cefoperazone-sulbactam combined with either tigecycline or rifampicin against clinical isolates of MDRAB.

Methods

One hundred and three MDRAB bacteria were isolated from patients in two hospitals in China. The Epsilomer test (E test) was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for amikacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, levofloxacin, rifampicin, cefoperazone-sulbactam, meropenem, tigecycline, and gentamicin against MDRAB isolates. In vitro effects of various antibiotic combinations were measured and the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) was calculated for each drug combination.

Results

Approximately 17.5% of the isolates were resistant to tigecycline, whereas more than 84.2% isolates were resistant to other antimicrobial agents tested in this study. Cefoperazone-sulbactam revealed remarkable synergistic effects when used in combination with either tigecycline or rifampicin. However, for the isolates with MICs lower than blood peak concentration after combination therapy, the ratio was lower in highly resistant isolates compared to the least resistant bacteria.

Conclusions

In vitro cefoperazone-sulbactam in combination with tigecycline or rifampicin showed the highest synergistic or additive activity against MDRAB isolates. However, acquisition of highly antibiotic resistant bacteria may lessen the effectiveness of combination therapy.

In Vitro Activity of Various Antibiotics in Combination with Tigecycline Against Acinetobacter baumannii: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Given that tigecycline-based combination therapy is recognized as a valuable option for the treatment of tigecycline-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the overall evidence of its effectiveness. The synergy rate was defined as the primary outcome that was calculated separately for time-kill, Etest, and checkerboard microdilution methods. The secondary outcomes were bactericidal activity and the efficacy of combination treatment on the development of resistance. In total, 37 published papers and 16 conference proceedings were included. Nine classes consisting of 22 antibiotic types in combination with tigecycline against 1,159 A. baumannii strains were reported in the analysis. For the time-kill studies, combination therapy showed a synergy rate of 37.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.7-46.5); the highest synergy rate was 67.4% (95% CI, 27.3-91.9) for tigecycline in combination with colistin. Moreover, combination with amikacin or colistin could efficiently inhibit the development of tigecycline resistance. Compared with checkerboard microdilution and Etest methods, time-kill studies always showed higher synergy rates. Altogether, these results suggest that the in vitro tigecycline-based combinations resulted in moderate synergy rates and that several combinations could suppress the resistance of A. baumannii to tigecycline, which should be further confirmed in animal models and clinical trials.