New Anticoagulants in Children

Normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride) versus heparin intermittent flushing for the prevention of occlusion in long-term central venous catheters in infants and children

BACKGROUND

Guidelines and clinical practice for the prevention of complications associated with central venous catheters (CVC) around the world vary greatly. Most institutions recommend the use of heparin to prevent occlusion; there is debate, however, regarding the need for heparin and evidence to suggest normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride) may be as effective. The use of heparin is not without risk, may be unnecessary and is also associated with increased cost. This is an update of the review published in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical effects (benefits and harms) of intermittent flushing of normal saline versus heparin to prevent occlusion in long-term central venous catheters in infants and children.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases; World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials register to 9 April 2019. We also undertook reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of intermittent flushing with normal saline versus heparin to prevent occlusion of long-term CVCs in infants and children aged up to 18 years of age. We excluded temporary CVCs and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial inclusion criteria, trial quality and extracted data. We assessed study quality with the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the rate ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We pooled data using a random-effects model; and we used GRADE to assess the overall certainty of the evidence supporting the outcomes assessed in this review.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified one new study for this update, bringing the total number of included studies to four (255 participants). The four trials directly compared the use of normal saline and heparin; the studies all used different protocols for the intervention and control arms, however, and all used different concentrations of heparin. Different frequencies of flushes were also reported between studies. In addition, not all studies reported on all outcomes. The certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low because there was no blinding; heterogeneity and inconsistency between studies was high; and the CIs were wide. CVC occlusion was assessed in all four trials. We were able to pool the results of two trials for the outcomes of CVC occlusion and CVC-associated blood stream infection. The estimated RR for CVC occlusion per 1000 catheter days between the normal saline and heparin groups was 0.75 (95% CI 0.10 to 5.51; 2 studies, 229 participants; very low certainty evidence). The estimated RR for CVC-associated blood stream infection was 1.48 (95% CI 0.24 to 9.37; 2 studies, 231 participants; low-certainty evidence). The duration of catheter placement was reported to be similar for the two study arms in one study (203 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and not reported in the remaining studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The review found that there was not enough evidence to determine the effects of intermittent flushing with normal saline versus heparin to prevent occlusion in long-term central venous catheters in infants and children. It remains unclear whether heparin is necessary to prevent occlusion, CVC-associated blood stream infection or effects duration of catheter placement. Lack of agreement between institutions around the world regarding the appropriate care and maintenance of these devices remains.

Anticoagulation Therapies in Children

Venous thromboembolism is occurring with increasing frequency in children resulting in the more widespread use of anticoagulation in pediatrics. Antithrombotic drugs in children can be divided into the standard and alternative agents. This review discusses standard and alternative anticoagulants. Because standard anticoagulants have significant limitations, including variable pharmacokinetics, issues with therapeutic drug monitoring, frequency of administration, efficacy, and adverse effects, it is expected that the use of alternative anticoagulants will increase over time. With their improved properties and recent prospective clinical trial data, the current and future use of these agents will likely slowly replace of the standard anticoagulants.

Anticoagulation in children: Making the most of little patients and little evidence

Thrombotic complications are increasing at a steady and significant rate in children resulting in the more widespread use of anticoagulation in this population. Anticoagulant drugs in children can be divided into the standard agents (heparin, low molecular weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonists) and alternative agents (argatroban, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux). This review will compare and contrast the standard and alternative anticoagulants and suggest situations in which it may be appropriate to use argatroban, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux. Clearly, the standard anticoagulants all have significant shortcomings including variable pharmacokinetics, issues with therapeutic drug monitoring, frequency of administration, efficacy, and adverse effects. The alternative anticoagulants have properties which overcome these shortcomings and prospective clinical trial data are presented supporting the current and future use of these agents in place of the standard anticoagulants.

Prediction of Warfarin Dose in Pediatric Patients: An Evaluation of the Predictive Performance of Several Models

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of pediatric pharmacogenetic-based dose prediction models by using an independent cohort of pediatric patients from a multicenter trial.

METHODS

Clinical and genetic data (CYP2C9 [cytochrome P450 2C9] and VKORC1 [vitamin K epoxide reductase]) were collected from pediatric patients aged 3 months to 17 years who were receiving warfarin as part of standard care at 3 separate clinical sites. The accuracy of 8 previously published pediatric pharmacogenetic-based dose models was evaluated in the validation cohort by comparing predicted maintenance doses to actual stable warfarin doses. The predictive ability was assessed by using the proportion of variance (R(2)), mean prediction error (MPE), and the percentage of predictions that fell within 20% of the actual maintenance dose.

RESULTS

Thirty-two children reached a stable international normalized ratio and were included in the validation cohort. The pharmacogenetic-based warfarin dose models showed a proportion of variance ranging from 35% to 78% and an MPE ranging from -2.67 to 0.85 mg/day in the validation cohort. Overall, the model developed by Hamberg et al showed the best performance in the validation cohort (R(2) = 78%; MPE = 0.15 mg/day) with 38% of the predictions falling within 20% of observed doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacogenetic-based algorithms provide better predictions than a fixed-dose approach, although an optimal dose algorithm has not yet been developed.

Anticoagulants in children and adolescents

Thrombotic complications are increasing at a steady and significant rate in children, resulting in the more widespread use of anticoagulation in this population. Anticoagulant drugs in children can be divided into the older multitargeted agents (heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and warfarin) and the newer targeted agents (argatroban, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux). This review will compare and contrast the multitargeted and targeted anticoagulants and suggest situations in which it may be appropriate to use argatroban, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux. The various agents differ in their pharmacokinetics, requirements for therapeutic drug monitoring, frequency of administration, efficacy, and adverse effects. The targeted anticoagulants have properties that may make them more attractive for use in specific clinical situations. Prospective clinical trial data are presented supporting the current and future use of these agents in children.

Anticoagulants in children and adolescents

Thrombotic complications are increasing at a steady and significant rate in children, resulting in the more widespread use of anticoagulation in this population. Anticoagulant drugs in children can be divided into the older multitargeted agents (heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and warfarin) and the newer targeted agents (argatroban, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux). This review will compare and contrast the multitargeted and targeted anticoagulants and suggest situations in which it may be appropriate to use argatroban, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux. The various agents differ in their pharmacokinetics, requirements for therapeutic drug monitoring, frequency of administration, efficacy, and adverse effects. The targeted anticoagulants have properties that may make them more attractive for use in specific clinical situations. Prospective clinical trial data are presented supporting the current and future use of these agents in children.

Anticoagulant therapy in pediatrics

Thromboembolic episodes are disorders encountered in both children and adults, but relatively more common in adults. However, the occurrence of venous thromboembolism and use of anticoagulants in pediatrics are increasing. Unfractionated Heparin (UH) is used as a treatment and prevention of thrombosis in adults and critically ill children. Heparin utilization in pediatric is limited by many factors and the most important ones are Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) and anaphylaxis. However, Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) appears to be an effective and safe alternative treatment. Hence, it is preferred over than UH due to favorable pharmacokinetic and side effect profile. Direct Thrombin Inhibitors (DTI) is a promising class over the other anticoagulants since it offers potential advantages. The aim of this review is to discuss the differences between adult and pediatric thromboembolism and to review the current anticoagulants in terms of pharmacological action, doses, drug reactions, pharmacokinetics, interactions, and parameters. This review also highlights the differences between old and new anticoagulant therapy in pediatrics.

Anticoagulation for pediatric mechanical circulatory support

Extracorporeal life support applications have evolved considerably in recent years. However, the blood-biomaterial interface remains incompletely understood, and management of the acute inflammatory response and coagulation pathways continues to be challenging. At present, the gold standard for anticoagulation is unfractionated heparin. Since the inception of extracorporeal life support, the mainstay for anticoagulation monitoring has been activated clotting time. However, alongside the technological evolution in extracorporeal life support, the methods for monitoring heparin have also become more sophisticated, adding additional layers of complexity to creating an ideal safe protocol for anticoagulation during extracorporeal life support. To address this, the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization has formed an Anticoagulation Task Force to help direct both a consensus statement and potential guidelines within which the multiple monitoring methods can be customized for extracorporeal life support. One key question that remains in the use of these monitoring methods is whether the objective during extracorporeal life support is to anticoagulate the circuit to prevent thrombus formation within the extracorporeal device or whether it is to systemically anticoagulate the patient. This review details all current monitoring methods and highlights how they can be used during pediatric mechanical circulatory support.

Anticoagulant therapy: basic principles, classic approaches and recent developments

The standard multipotent anticoagulants (unfractionated and low molecular weight heparins, antagonists of vitamin K) are commonly used for treatment and/or prophylaxis of different thrombotic complications, such as deep vein thrombosis, thrombophilia, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, stroke and so on. Advantages and shortcomings of these anticoagulants are considered. The modern tendencies to use small selective direct inhibitors of thrombin or factor Xa are surveyed. The search of the new targets in the coagulation cascade for development of new promising anticoagulants and improvement in antithrombotic therapy is discussed.

The pediatric cardiology pharmacopeia: 2013 update

The use of medications plays a pivotal role in the management of children with heart diseases. Most children with increased pulmonary blood flow require chronic use of anticongestive heart failure medications until more definitive interventional or surgical procedures are performed. The use of such medications, particularly inotropic agents and diuretics, is even more amplified during the postoperative period. Currently, children are undergoing surgical intervention at an ever younger age with excellent results aided by advanced anesthetic and postoperative care. The most significant of these advanced measures includes invasive and noninvasive monitoring as well as a wide array of pharmacologic agents. This review update provides a medication guide for medical practitioners involved in care of children with heart diseases.

Bivalirudin use in an infant with persistent clotting on unfractionated heparin

Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor approved for use in adult patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Recently, its use in the pediatric population has increased due to its anti-thrombin-independent mechanism of action. As heparin products produce great inter- and intraindividual variability in pediatric patients, often due to decreased anti-thrombin concentrations in the first year of life, some practitioners have turned to direct thrombin inhibitors, such as bivalirudin, for more predictable pharmacokinetics and effects on bound and circulating thrombin. We report our experience using bivalirudin in a 2-month-old female with recurrent systemic thrombi despite continuous unfractionated heparin infusion. Due to the patient's inability to maintain therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values during heparin infusion, bivalirudin was initiated at 0.1 mg/kg/h and increased due to subtherapeutic aPTTs to a maximum of 0.58 mg/kg/h. Therapeutic aPTTs were achieved at the increased dose; however, the patient's worsening renal impairment with resultant drug accumulation and overwhelming sepsis on day 5 of therapy led to discontinuation of the infusion and the initiation of comfort measures.

Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Neonates and children differ from adults in physiology, pharmacologic responses to drugs, epidemiology, and long-term consequences of thrombosis. This guideline addresses optimal strategies for the management of thrombosis in neonates and children.

METHODS

The methods of this guideline follow those described in the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

RESULTS

We suggest that where possible, pediatric hematologists with experience in thromboembolism manage pediatric patients with thromboembolism (Grade 2C). When this is not possible, we suggest a combination of a neonatologist/pediatrician and adult hematologist supported by consultation with an experienced pediatric hematologist (Grade 2C). We suggest that therapeutic unfractionated heparin in children is titrated to achieve a target anti-Xa range of 0.35 to 0.7 units/mL or an activated partial thromboplastin time range that correlates to this anti-Xa range or to a protamine titration range of 0.2 to 0.4 units/mL (Grade 2C). For neonates and children receiving either daily or bid therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin, we suggest that the drug be monitored to a target range of 0.5 to 1.0 units/mL in a sample taken 4 to 6 h after subcutaneous injection or, alternatively, 0.5 to 0.8 units/mL in a sample taken 2 to 6 h after subcutaneous injection (Grade 2C).

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence supporting most recommendations for antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children remains weak. Studies addressing appropriate drug target ranges and monitoring requirements are urgently required in addition to site- and clinical situation-specific thrombosis management strategies.

Old and new antithrombotic drugs in neonates and infants

Thromboembolic complications are becoming more frequent in children and the use of anticoagulation has increased considerably. The most widely used agents in children, heparin, low molecular weight heparin, and warfarin all have limitations which are exaggerated in children. This has led to the study of newer agents with improved pharmacologic properties such as bivalirudin, argatroban, and fondaparinux. Clinical trials are under way to assess several new oral anticoagulants that are in late phase studies or already licensed in adults. Based on the completed studies in children, several recommendations for the use of currently available agents (bivalirudin, argatroban, and fondaparinux) are suggested for clinical use today. Additional studies need to be conducted for the these agents, so that their use may be expanded in selected indications. New regulatory requirements are leading to a number of studies in the newer anticoagulants that are yet to be licensed in adults for treatment of venous thromboembolism. Pediatric thrombosis is entering a fruitful era of research in anticoagulation management, which is sure to lead to significant changes in how children are treated in the next 10 years.

Direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors in children: a quest for new anticoagulants for children

Venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism rarely occur in children but are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) mostly affects children with severe underlying conditions and multiple risk factors. Newborns and adolescents are at the highest risk. Standard and low molecular weight heparins and vitamin K antagonists are routinely used for the prevention and treatment of VTE. The new anticoagulants, both parenteral such as argatroban, bivalirudin and fondaparinux and oral such as dabigatran and rivaroxaban, have favourable pharmacological properties, all are approved for clinical use in adults and are currently being investigated in children. Argatroban is the only new anticoagulant licensed for use in children so far. The role of these new anticoagulants as alternative anticoagulants for children remains to be defined. This review focuses on the characteristics of VTE in children and reviews current knowledge on the use of the new thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors in this population.

Management of pulmonary arterial hypertension in children

In this review we discuss the new anti- Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [PAH] drugs and the available data on their use in paediatric PAH. Treatment of patients with PAH, children and adults, is aimed at a reduction of symptoms, survival and improvement of haemodynamics as well as exercise capacity. PAH may reflect significant different disease conditions in infants and children when compared to PAH in adults. In contrast to adult PAH, characterized mainly by idiopathic PAH and PAH associated with connective tissue disease, more than half of the cases of PAH in children are associated with congenital heart disease. Therefore, efficacy of PAH drugs in these diseases can not be extrapolated from that in adults with PAH.

The impact of prophylactic fresh-frozen plasma and cryoprecipitate on the incidence of central nervous system thrombosis and hemorrhage in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving asparaginase

Asparaginase (ASP) therapy is associated with depletion of antithrombin (AT) and fibrinogen (FG). Potential toxicities include central nervous system thrombosis (CNST) and hemorrhage. Historical practice at the Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre (IWK) involves measuring AT and FG levels after ASP administration and transfusing fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) or cryoprecipitate (CRY) to prevent thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. To determine whether this reduced these complications in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), incidence, outcome, and clinical characteristics of ASP-related CNST in ALL patients at IWK were compared with a similar cohort from BC Children's Hospital (BCCH), where prophylaxis was not performed. Costs associated with preventative versus expectant management were estimated. From 1990 to 2005, 240 patients were treated at IWK and 479 at BCCH. Seven BCCH patients developed venous CNST (1.5%), compared with none at IWK. CNST occurred exclusively during induction. Six patients received anticoagulation and continued ASP. All 7 patients remain in remission. National Cancer Institute high-risk ALL predicted CNST risk (P = .02), whereas sex, age, race, and body mass index did not. Neither FFP nor CRY protected against CNST, suggesting prophylaxis is unwarranted for unselected ALL patients. However, prophylactic replacement for HR patients in induction may be cost-effective.