Allogeneic BM transplantation for the treatment of aplastic anemia: current results and expanding donor possibilities

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Severe Aplastic Anemia: Evidence-Based Guidelines From the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Existing guidance about HCT in SAA is primarily derived from expert reviews, registry data and societal guidelines; however, transplant-specific guidelines for SAA are lacking. A panel of SAA experts, both pediatric and adult transplant physicians, developed consensus recommendations using Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology employing a GRADE guideline development tool. The panel agrees with previous recommendations for the preferential use of bone marrow as a graft source and the use of rabbit over horse antithymocyte globulin (ATG) for HCT conditioning. Fludarabine containing regimens are preferred for patients at high risk of graft failure and those receiving matched unrelated or haploidentical donor transplant. Given advancements in HCT, the panel does not endorse the historical 40-year age cut-off for considering upfront HCT in adults, acknowledging that fit older patients may also benefit from HCT. The panel also endorses increased utilization of HCT by prioritizing matched unrelated or haploidentical donor HCT over immunosuppressive therapy in children and adults who lack a matched related donor. Finally, the panel suggests either calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate or post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for matched related or matched unrelated donor recipients. These recommendations reflect a significant advancement in transplant strategies for SAA and highlight the importance of ongoing and further research to revisit current evidence in terms of donor choice, conditioning chemotherapy, GVHD prophylaxis and post-transplant immunosuppression.

Severe aplastic anemia patients with infection who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation had a better chance: Long-term outcomes of a multicenter study

Background and aims

How to select the treatment is a challenge for the management of acquired patients with infections. This study aimed at comparing the outcomes of SAA with infections who had an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT)with that of patients who had an infection and received non-HSCT therapy.

Methods

We retrospectively compared the outcomes of patients with acquired SAA and infections who had an allo-HSCT (n = 141) with that of patients who had an infection and received non-HSCT therapy (n = 186) between July 2004 and January 2020.

Results

The treatment-related mortality (TRM) of grade 1-2 infections in the HSCT and non-HSCT groups was 24.99% and 13.68%, respectively (P = 0.206), while the TRM of grade 3-4 infections was lower in the HSCT group than that observed in the non-HSCT group (18.54% vs. 33.33%, P = 0.036). At 6 months post-treatment, 91.30% patients in the HSCT group and 8.78% patients in the non-HSCT group had achieved a normal blood profile (P < 0.0001). The time required to discontinue transfusions of red blood cells and platelets in the non-HSCT group was longer than in the HSCT group (P < 0.0001). Estimated overall survival (OS) at 6 years was similar in the two groups (75.5% ± 3.9% vs. 76.3% ± 3.1%, P = 0.996), while the estimated failure-free survival (FFS) at 6 years was 75.2% ± 3.8% in the HSCT group and 48.9% ± 3.7% in the non-HSCT group (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that younger age, lower grade of infection (grade 1-2), and SAA (vs. very SAA) were favorable factors for OS (P < 0.05), and that the choice of HSCT and younger age were favorable factors for FFS (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

These results suggest that allo-HSCT has a better chance of a successful outcome than non-HSCT in SAA patients with an infection.

A comparative study of porcine antihuman lymphocyte globulin versus antithymocyte globulin-fresenius in an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation conditioning regimen for severe aplastic anemia

OBJECTIVES

To compare the outcomes of antihuman T lymphocyte globulin (ATG-F) and porcine antihuman lymphocyte globulin (p-ALG) as part of a conditioning regimen in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for severe aplastic anemia (SAA).

METHODS

we performed a retrospective analysis, evaluating the outcome of patients with SAA who received ATG-F based conditioning (n = 26) with those receiving p-ALG conditioning (n = 34).

RESULTS

The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 11 days (range, 8 - 38) and 11 days (range, 9 - 24) in the p-ALG and ATG-F groups (P = 0.857); the median platelet engraftment time was 15 (range, 9 - 330) days and 13 (range, 10 - 56) days (P = 0.155). There were no significant differences in grades II - IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), grades III - IV aGVHD, chronic GVHD (cGVHD), and the moderate-severe cGVHD between the ATG-F and p-ALG groups (P>0.05).

DISCUSSION

Patients in the ATG-F group functioned significantly better on role-physical (P = 0.006), general health (P = 0.029), and physical component summary (P = 0.009). The estimated overall survival and failure free survival rates at 5 years were 88.5% ± 6.3% vs. 82.4% ± 6.5% (P = 0.515), 84.6% ± 7.1% vs. 79.4% ± 6.9%, respectively (P = 0.579). The infection rates were 61.53% and 47.05%, respectively (P = 0.265).

CONCLUSION

As part of the conditioning regimen, p-ALG achieved a similar efficacy as ATG-F without increasing the incidence of transplantation complications in SAA patients.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in aplastic anemia: current indications and transplant strategies

Treatment options for newly diagnosed aplastic anemia (AA) patient includes upfront allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) or immunosuppressive therapy (IST). With recent advances in supportive care, conditioning regimens and post-transplant immunosuppression the overall survival for HSCT approaches 70-90%. Transplant eligibility needs to be assessed considering age, comorbidities, donor availability and probability of response to immunosuppressive therapy (IST). Upfront HSCT should be offered to children and young adults with matched related donor (MRD). Upfront HSCT may also be offered to children and young adults with rapidly available matched unrelated donor (MUD) who require urgent HSCT. Bone marrow (BM) graft source and cyclosporine (CsA) plus methotrexate (MTX) as graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis are preferable when using anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) based conditioning regimens. Alemtuzumab is an acceptable alternative to ATG and is used with CsA alone and with either BM or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Cyclophosphamide (CY) plus ATG conditioning is preferable for patients receiving MRD transplant, while Fludarabine (Flu) based conditioning is reserved for older adults, those with risk factors of graft failure and those receiving MUD HSCT. For haploidentical transplant, use of low dose radiotherapy and post-transplant cyclophosphamide has resulted in a marked reduction in graft failure and GVHD.

Comparison of efficacy and health-related quality of life of first-line haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with unrelated cord blood infusion and first-line immunosuppressive therapy for acquired severe aplastic anemia

We retrospectively compared the efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of (1) first-line haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT, n = 146) combined with unrelated cord blood (UCB) infusion and (2) first-line immunosuppressive therapy (IST, n = 219) in acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients. At 6 months post treatment, 90.30% patients in the haplo-HSCT group and 18.78% patients in the IST group achieved normal blood routine (P < 0.0001). The time required to discontinue red blood cells and platelets transfusion in the IST group were longer than in the haplo-HSCT group (P < 0.0001). The estimated overall survival at 4 years was similar (80.1 ± 3.5% vs. 80.1 ± 3.0%, P = 0.726); the estimated failure-free survival (FFS) at 4 years was 77.8 ± 3.7% in the haplo-HSCT group and 48.0 ± 3.6% in the IST group (P < 0.0001). Patients treated with haplo-HSCT scored significantly better in the HRQoL than treated with IST (P < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, first-line haplo-HSCT was the favorable factor for FFS and HRQoL (P < 0.0001). These results suggest that first-line haplo-HSCT combined with UCB infusion might provide a better chance of success and HRQoL than first-line IST for SAA patients.

Comparison of Conventional Cyclophosphamide versus Fludarabine-Based Conditioning in High-Risk Aplastic Anemia Patients Undergoing Matched-Related Donor Transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplant for high-risk aplastic anemia (AA) yields inferior results using conventional cyclophosphamide (CY)-based conditioning. The use of fludarabine (Flu)-based regimens has resulted in improved outcomes in high-risk patients. Limited data are available comparing these two conditioning regimens in such patients. We retrospectively analyzed 192 high-risk patients undergoing matched-related donor transplantation from July 2001 to December 2018. The median age was 19.5 (2–52) years. Patients were divided into 2 groups, Cy²⁰⁰ anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)²⁰ (Gp1 n = 79) or Flu^120–150 Cy^120–160 ATG²⁰ (Gp2 n = 113). The risk of graft failure was significantly higher in Gp1, and the majority occurred in patients with >2 risk factors (p = 0.02). The incidence of grade II-IV acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD was not significantly different between the two groups. The overall survival (OS) of the study cohort was 81.3 %, disease-free survival (DFS) 76.6 % and GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 64.1%. DFS and GRFS were significantly higher in Gp2 as compared to Gp1: DFS 84.1% versus 68.4 % (p = 0.02), GRFS 77.9% versus 54.4% (p = 0.01), respectively. We conclude that Flu-based conditioning is associated with superior OS, DFS and GRFS as compared to the conventional Cy-based regimen in high-risk AA.

Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplants for Pediatric Severe Aplastic Anemia: Real-world Data comparing Matched Related and Unrelated Donors in a Developing Country. Retrospective study on behalf of the Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Working Group of the Brazilian Bone Marrow Transplantation Society (SBTMO) and the Brazil-Seattle Consortium (Gedeco)

In this study, we report on major MRD or URD BMT outcomes in pediatric patients with SAA in Brazil. This was a retrospective study, which included 106 patients ≤18 years old who received a first BMT for SAA. All patients received bone marrow as graft source from an MRD (n = 69) or a URD (n = 37). Conditioning regimen was non-myeloablative in 73.6% of cases, and GVHD prophylaxis comprised a calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate in 89.6% of patients. After a median follow-up of 4.5 years after BMT, 81 patients are alive, with a 4-year OS of 77% and no statistically significant difference between the MRD and URD groups (82% vs. 69%, respectively; P = .08). Grade III-IV aGVHD at 6 months and cGVHD at 2 years were observed in 8% and 14% of cases, respectively, and were not statistically different between the groups. Twenty-five (23%) patients died at a median of 2.9 months after BMT. Our study showed that 4-year OS after BMT was not statistically different between MRD and URD recipients. This study shows that the outcomes of pediatric patients transplanted for SAA with a URD in Brazil are approaching those of MRD transplants. In contrast, OS after MRD BMT was lower than we would expect based on previous reports. The wide range of preparatory regimens used by the study centers highlights the need for standardized protocols for these children. Our findings provide a benchmark for future studies focused on improving BMT outcomes in this setting in Brazil.

Aplastic Anemia in China

Aplastic anemia (AA) is a hematologic disease characterized by pancytopenia. Up to now, severe aplastic anemia (SAA) has been recognized by international and domestic scholars as an autoimmune disease with bone marrow (BM) failure mediated by the hyperfunctional T lymphocytes. The incidence of AA is more in China compared with other countries. In the recent years, both the pathogenesis and treatment of AA have made a great progress in our country. Thus, the therapeutic effect of AA was much better than before. Here, we conclude the researches of AA in China.

Outcome of Second Transplantation Using Umbilical Cord Blood for Graft Failure after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Aplastic Anemia

Graft failure (GF) is the most critical life-threatening complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for aplastic anemia, for which a second transplantation is the only effective treatment. Optimal procedures have not been established for the second transplantation in this setting, however. Here we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 22 patients with aplastic anemia, age ≥16 years, who underwent umbilical cord blood transplantation for GF after the first HSCT using the registry database of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. The median age of patients was 36 years (range, 16 to 72 years), and the median time from the first to the second transplant was 77 days (range, 29 to 1061 days). The cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment at day 60 post-transplantation was 45.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.6% to 65.0%). With a median follow-up of 50 months, the 4-year overall survival (OS) was 38.5% (95% CI, 18.4% to 58.5%). Mycofenolate mofetil-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis demonstrated greater neutrophil recovery than prophylaxis with calcineurin inhibitor alone or methotrexate-based prophylaxis (66.7% versus 37.5%; P = .04). The use of such conditioning regimens as fludarabine + melphalan or cyclophosphamide + low-dose total body irradiation was associated with better engraftment (58.3% versus 30%; P = .05) and better 4-year OS (55.6% versus 20%; P = .05) than other regimens. Although further investigation is needed, umbilical cord blood could be an effective and promising option for stem cell source for urgent second transplantation in patients with aplastic anemia who develop GF after the first HSCT.

Population pharmacokinetics of fludarabine in patients with aplastic anemia and Fanconi anemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Although hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with a conditioning regimen consisting of fludarabine (F-araA) and cyclophosphamide (Cy) is associated with improved outcome in young patients with aplastic anemia (AA) and Fanconi anemia (FA), several factors limit the success of the procedure. We evaluated the population pharmacokinetics (POPPK) of F-araA and its influence on HSCT outcome in patients (n=53) with AA and FA undergoing HSCT. Patients carrying a 5′-UTR polymorphism in NT5E gene (rs2295890 G>C) exhibited significantly lower plasma F-araA clearance compared to those with wild-type genotype (7.12 vs 5.03 L/h/m² (29%) P<0.05). F-araA clearance was significantly higher in patients with AA compared to FA (2.46 ×, P<1e−6). Of all the outcome parameters evaluated (engraftment, rejection/graft failure, GvHD, TRM, OS), high F-araA AUC (>29.4 μm*h) was the only significant factor associated with the development of aGvHD by both univariate and multivariate analysis (P=0.02). The influence of plasma F-araA levels need to be evaluated in a larger cohort of patients to propose the need for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Allogeneic unrelated bone marrow transplantation from older donors results in worse prognosis in recipients with aplastic anemia

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is an essential therapy for acquired aplastic anemia and prognosis has recently improved. However, engraftment failure and graft-versus-host disease are potential fatal complications. Various risk factors for poor prognosis have been identified, such as patient age and human-leukocyte antigen disparity, but the relationship between donor age and prognosis is still unknown. Therefore, we performed a cohort study to compare the prognosis of unrelated bone marrow transplantation from younger and older donors using the registry database in Japan. We evaluated 427 patients (age 16-72 years) with aplastic anemia who underwent bone marrow transplantation from younger (≤39 years, n=281) or older (≥40 years, n=146) unrelated donors. Overall survival of the older donor group was significantly inferior to that of the younger donor group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.64; 95% confidence interval 1.15-2.35; P<0.01). The incidence of fatal infection was significantly higher in the older donor group (13.7% vs. 7.5%; P=0.03). Primary engraftment failure and acute graft-versus-host disease were significantly more frequent in the older donor group (9.7% vs. 5.0%; adjusted hazard ratio 1.30; P=0.01, and 27.1% vs. 19.7%; adjusted hazard ratio 1.56; P=0.03, respectively). Acute graft-versus-host disease was related to a worse prognosis in the whole cohort. This study showed the inferiority of older donors in aplastic anemia; thus, donor age should be considered when multiple donors are available. A large-scale prospective study is warranted to establish a better donor selection algorithm for bone marrow transplantation in aplastic anemia.

Anemia of Central Origin

Hypoproliferative anemia results from the inability of bone marrow to produce adequate numbers of red blood cells. The list of conditions that cause hypoproliferative anemia is long, starting from common etiologies as iron deficiency to rarer diagnoses of constitutional bone marrow failure syndromes. There is no perfect diagnostic algorithm, and clinical data may not always clearly distinguish "normal" from "abnormal", yet it is important for practicing clinicians to recognize each condition so that treatment can be initiated promptly. This review describes diagnostic approaches to hypoproliferative anemia, with particular emphasis on bone marrow failure syndromes.

[Aplastic anemia: Current state of diagnosis and treatment]

Aplastic anemia (AAI) is a rare life-threatening disorder which is characterized by bi- or tricytopenia and hypoplastic or aplastic bone marrow. AA can present as an acquired or congenital disorder. In recent years it was noted that a subgroup of patients with seemingly acquired AA with onset in adulthood carry mutations which cause or at least predispose to bone marrow failure, e.g. mutations in the genes of the telomerase complex. Options for first-line treatment are allogeneic stem cell transplantation or immunosuppression. The decision depends on severity of the disease, age and comorbidity of the patient and availability of a matched stem cell donor. Probability of survival after HLA-identical sibling transplantation exceeds 90% in young patients with bone marrow as the stem cell source and conditioning with an ATG-containing regimen. Results of matched unrelated donor transplantation have improved substantially over the last 10 years. Matched unrelated donor transplantation is increasingly considered as the first-line treatment for very young patients who are candidates for transplantation, but lack an HLA-identical sibling donor. The gold standard for immunosuppression is the combination of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine A (CsA). ATG, a polyvalent antibody preparation, is obtained from animals after immunization with human thymocytes. Response rate and overall survival after horse ATG treatment are significantly higher compared to rabbit ATG. Recent trials reported a surprisingly high rate of bi- and trilinear response to treatment with the thrombopoietin receptor agonist eltrombopag in patients refractory to immunosuppression. Ongoing trials now address the potential role of eltrombopag as an adjunct to immunosuppression in first-line treatment.

Management of the refractory aplastic anemia patient: what are the options?

Refractory aplastic anemia (AA) is defined as a lack of response to first-line immunosuppressive therapy (IST) with antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporin and is manifested as persistence of severe cytopenias at 6 months after IST. Although supportive care is critical for AA patients, it is of paramount importance for refractory disease in view of the longer duration of pancytopenia and susceptibility to life-threatening infections due to IST. Improvements in supportive care have largely contributed to better outcome over the past 2 decades, with 5-year overall survival reaching 57% during 2002 to 2008 for patients with AA unresponsive to initial IST. Exclusion of hypocellular myelodysplastic syndrome and constitutional BM failure masquerading as apparent idiopathic AA should be done in conjunction with centers of excellence. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is indicated if refractory AA patients are fit and have a suitably matched donor, either a sibling (> 40-50 years) or unrelated donor. Patients lacking a fully matched donor should be considered for a second course of antithymocyte globulin plus cyclosporin, although response in the refractory setting is only ∼ 30% to 35%. Response may also occur with alemtuzumab or the thrombopoietin mimetic eltrombopag in refractory AA. The emerging data for alternate donor (cord or haploidentical) transplantation in AA has provided additional therapeutic choices to consider in refractory disease.

Management of the refractory aplastic anemia patient: what are the options?

Refractory aplastic anemia (AA) is defined as a lack of response to first-line immunosuppressive therapy (IST) with antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporin and is manifested as persistence of severe cytopenias at 6 months after IST. Although supportive care is critical for AA patients, it is of paramount importance for refractory disease in view of the longer duration of pancytopenia and susceptibility to life-threatening infections due to IST. Improvements in supportive care have largely contributed to better outcome over the past 2 decades, with 5-year overall survival reaching 57% during 2002 to 2008 for patients with AA unresponsive to initial IST. Exclusion of hypocellular myelodysplastic syndrome and constitutional BM failure masquerading as apparent idiopathic AA should be done in conjunction with centers of excellence. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is indicated if refractory AA patients are fit and have a suitably matched donor, either a sibling (>40-50 years) or unrelated donor. Patients lacking a fully matched donor should be considered for a second course of antithymocyte globulin plus cyclosporin, although response in the refractory setting is only ∼30% to 35%. Response may also occur with alemtuzumab or the thrombopoietin mimetic eltrombopag in refractory AA. The emerging data for alternate donor (cord or haploidentical) transplantation in AA has provided additional therapeutic choices to consider in refractory disease.

Current concepts in the pathophysiology and treatment of aplastic anemia

Historically viewed in isolation as an odd, rare, and invariably fatal blood disease, aplastic anemia is now of substantial interest for its immune pathophysiology, its relationship to constitutional BM failure syndromes and leukemia, and the success of both stem cell transplantation and immunosuppressive therapies in dramatically improving survival of patients. Once relegated to a few presentations in the red cell and anemia sessions of the ASH, the Society now sponsors multiple simultaneous sessions and plenary and scientific committee presentations on these topics. This update emphasizes developments in our understanding of immune mechanisms and hematopoietic stem cell biology and new clinical approaches to stem cell stimulation as a therapy, alone and in combination with conventional suppression of the aberrant immune system.