1
|
Al-Juhaishi T, Ahmed S. Management of limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2023; 2023:500-509. [PMID: 38066938 PMCID: PMC10905319 DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2023000511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a rare type of B-cell malignancy with bimodal age distribution targeting young adults and elderly. Prognostic models are available to identify risk of recurrence and response to treatment. Currently, positron emission tomography scanning is most useful in optimizing therapy. Outcomes are generally excellent with standard chemotherapy or combined modality therapy. Balancing efficacy and the risk of late effects in Hodgkin lymphoma is essential, including early detection of potential complications. Incorporation of novel therapies such as brentuximab vedotin and checkpoint inhibitors are being explored in the frontline setting, having already demonstrated improved survival and tolerable toxicity in advanced HL. Furthermore, the addition of these agents have the potential to transform treatment paradigms for early-stage HL and may result in improved outcomes with decreased risks of late toxicities that continue to afflict long-term survivors. However, the patient population, sequencing, and combinations with cytotoxic chemotherapy all remain still standing questions as results of current and upcoming randomized trials are awaited. In this article, we discuss the current data on the approach to initial treatment of early-stage classical HL, review toxicity profiles, and examine upcoming novel therapy trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sairah Ahmed
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Minoia C, Viviani S, Silvestris E, Palini S, Parissone F, De Palma G, Fedina A, Cormio G, Guarini A, Gini G, Montano L, Merli F, Peccatori FA. Fertility preservation and monitoring in adult patients diagnosed with lymphoma: consensus-based practical recommendations by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi & Società Italiana della Riproduzione Umana. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1252433. [PMID: 37766870 PMCID: PMC10520955 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1252433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Fertility preservation (FP) and monitoring has considerable relevance in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer patients. In these consensus-based practical recommendations, the scientific societies Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) and Società Italiana della Riproduzione Umana (SIRU) reviewed the main aspects and identified the optimal paths which aim to preserve and monitor fertility in patients diagnosed with lymphoma at the different phases of the disease and during long-term survivorship. Methods For the Panel, eleven experts were selected for their expertise in research and clinical practice on onco-fertility and lymphoma. The Panel's activity was supervised by a chairman. A series of rank-ordering key questions were proposed according to their clinical relevance and discussed among the Panel, focusing on patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and Hodgkin lymphoma. Agreement among all the Panelists on the content and terminology of the statements was evaluated by a web-based questionnaire according to the Delphi methodology. Results From the literature review a total of 78 questions or sentences, divided into the 6 areas of interest, were identified. By applying the Gwet's AC, k was: Section 1: 0,934 (Very good); Section 2: 0,958 (Very good); Section 3: 0,863 (Very good); Section 4: 0,649 (Good); Section 5: 0,936 (Very good); Section 6 raw agreement 100%. Two rounds of Delphi allowed to provide the maximum agreement. All statements were newly discussed in a round robin way and confirmed for the drafting of the final recommendations. Discussion These recommendations would be useful for onco-hematologists, gynecologists, urologists, and general practice physicians who take care of young lymphoma patients to guarantee an evidence-based oncofertility assessment and treatment during the oncologic pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Minoia
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Simonetta Viviani
- Division of Onco-Hematology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Erica Silvestris
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Simone Palini
- Physiopathology of Reproduction Unit, Cervesi Hospital, Cattolica, Italy
| | - Francesca Parissone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Università di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe De Palma
- Institutional BioBank, Experimental Oncology and Biobank Management Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Anna Fedina
- Data Office Fondazione Italiana Linfomi, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Gennaro Cormio
- IRCCS Istituto Tumori Departiment of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Attilio Guarini
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Guido Gini
- Clinic of Hematology Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (AOU) delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Luigi Montano
- Andrology Unit and Service of Lifestyle Medicine in UroAndrology, Local Health Authority (ASL), Salerno, Italy
| | - Francesco Merli
- Hematology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Holowatyj AN, Eng C, Lewis MA. Incorporating Reproductive Health in the Clinical Management of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:169-172. [PMID: 34554830 PMCID: PMC8932489 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andreana N. Holowatyj
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN,Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN,Andreana N. Holowatyj, PhD, MSCI, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave, Suite 334-G, Nashville, TN 37203; e-mail:
| | - Cathy Eng
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN,Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Follows GA, Barrington SF, Bhuller KS, Culligan DJ, Cutter DJ, Gallop-Evans E, Kassam S, Osborne W, Sadullah S, Townsend W, Uttenthal BJ, Collins GP. Guideline for the first-line management of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma - A British Society for Haematology guideline. Br J Haematol 2022; 197:558-572. [PMID: 35191541 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
This guideline was compiled according to the British Society for Haematology (BSH) process at https://b-s-h.org.uk/media/16732/bsh-guidance-development-process-dec-5-18.pdf. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) nomenclature was used to evaluate levels of evidence and to assess the strength of recommendations. The GRADE criteria can be found at http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org. Recommendations are based on a review of the literature using Medline, PubMed/Medline and Cochrane searches beginning from 2013 up to January 2021. The following search terms were used: [Hodgkin lymphoma OR Hodgkin disease] NOT non-Hodgkin; AND [chemotherapy OR radiotherapy]; AND [elderly]; AND [teenage OR adolescent OR young adult]; AND [pregnancy]. Filters were applied to include only publications written in English, studies carried out in humans, clinical conferences, congresses, clinical trials, clinical studies, meta-analyses, multicentre studies and randomised controlled trials. References pre-2013 were taken from the previous version of this guideline.1 Review of the manuscript was performed by the British Society for Haematology (BSH) Guidelines Committee Haematology Oncology Taskforce, the BSH Guidelines Committee and the Haematology Oncology sounding board of BSH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George A Follows
- Department of Haematology, Cambridge University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sally F Barrington
- King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - Kaljit S Bhuller
- Paediatric, Teenage & Young Adult (TYA) Haematology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | | | - David J Cutter
- Department of Oncology, Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Shireen Kassam
- Department of Haematology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Wendy Osborne
- Department of Haematology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Shalal Sadullah
- Department of Haematology, James Paget University Hospital, Great Yarmouth, UK
| | - William Townsend
- Department of Haematology, University College Hospital London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Benjamin J Uttenthal
- Department of Haematology, Cambridge University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Graham P Collins
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sagaradze G, Monakova A, Basalova N, Popov V, Balabanyan V, Efimenko A. Regenerative medicine for male infertility: a focus on stem cell niche injury models. Biomed J 2022; 45:607-614. [PMID: 35123107 PMCID: PMC9486244 DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2022.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Stem and progenitor cells located within stem cell niches maintain the renewal and regeneration of tissues and organs throughout the life of an adult organism. Stem cell niche component dysfunction might alter the activity of stem cells and ultimately lead to the development of difficult-to-treat chronic or acute disorders. Of note, some cases of idiopathic male infertility, a highly prevalent diagnosis with no specific treatment options, might be associated with a spermatogonial stem cell(SSC) niche disturbance. To overcome this disease entity, approaches aiming at launching the regeneration of an altered stem cell niche are worth considering. Particularly, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) or their secretome might fulfill this task due to their promising contribution in recovering injured stem cell niches. However, the successful application of MSC-based treatment is limited by the uncovered mechanisms of action of MSCs and their secretome. Specific animal models should be developed or adapted to reveal the role of MSCs and their secretome in a stem cell niche recovery. In this review, in a bid to consider MSCs and their secretome as a therapeutic regenerative approach for idiopathic male infertility we focus on the rationale of SSC niche injury modeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgy Sagaradze
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Medical Research and Education Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia
| | - Anna Monakova
- Faculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia
| | - Nataliya Basalova
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Medical Research and Education Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia; Faculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia
| | - Vladimir Popov
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Medical Research and Education Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia; Faculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia
| | - Vadim Balabanyan
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Medical Research and Education Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia
| | - Anastasia Efimenko
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Medical Research and Education Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia; Faculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Øvlisen AK, Jakobsen LH, Eloranta S, Kragholm KH, Hutchings M, Frederiksen H, Kamper P, Dahl-Sørensen RB, Stoltenberg D, Weibull CE, Entrop JP, Glimelius I, Smedby KE, Torp-Pedersen C, Severinsen MT, El-Galaly TC. Parenthood Rates and Use of Assisted Reproductive Techniques in Younger Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors: A Danish Population-Based Study. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3463-3472. [PMID: 34170749 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The majority of young adults with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are cured, but chemotherapy-induced infertility can have profound psychosocial consequences. Providing data on parenthood rates and use of assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) after contemporary HL treatment is important for patient counseling and survivorship care. MATERIALS AND METHODS All Danish patients with HL diagnosed during 2000-2015 at the ages 18-40 years who achieved remission after first-line therapy were included and matched on age, sex, and parenthood status to five random persons from the general population. Parenthood rates were defined as the rate of first live birth per 1,000 person years, starting 9 months after HL diagnosis. Nationwide birth and patient registers were used to capture parenthood outcomes and ARTs use. RESULTS A total of 793 HL survivors and 3,965 comparators were included (median follow-up 8.7 years). Similar parenthood rates were observed for male and female HL survivors when compared with matched comparators (56.2 v 57.1; P = .871 for males and 63.8 v 61.2; P = .672 for females). For male HL survivors, BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) therapy was associated with lower parenthood rates as compared to the matched comparators (28.1 v 60.8; P = .020). Live birth after ARTs were more common for HL survivors than for comparators (males 21.6% v 6.3%; P < .001; females 13.6% v 5.5%; P = .001). There were no differences in gestational age, Apgar score, or newborn measurements between HL survivors and matched comparators. CONCLUSION The parenthood rates for HL survivors who have not experienced relapse were generally similar to the general population. However, ARTs were used more often before the first live birth in HL survivors, which is relevant information when discussing possible long-term side effects and fertility-preserving treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas K Øvlisen
- Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lasse H Jakobsen
- Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Sandra Eloranta
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristian H Kragholm
- Unit of Clinical Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Martin Hutchings
- Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Peter Kamper
- Department of Hematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Danny Stoltenberg
- Department of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Caroline E Weibull
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Joshua P Entrop
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Glimelius
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Unit of Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Karin E Smedby
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Christian Torp-Pedersen
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Cardiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Marianne T Severinsen
- Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.,Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Tarec C El-Galaly
- Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.,Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Multidisciplinary Management of Adolescent and Young Adult Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2021; 22:64. [PMID: 34097142 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00861-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Successful management of adolescent and young adult patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) requires a multidisciplinary approach to care with special attention paid to the unique medical, logistical, and psychosocial challenges faced by this group. The emotional and social changes and big life transitions that occur between the ages of 15 and 39 result in a broad scope of supportive care needs that differ from children or adults in similar circumstances. Currently, care of adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with HL may be fractured across the pediatric-adult cancer care continuum resulting in this group being less well studied than pediatric or adult patients in general. In order to optimize outcomes, these patients need access to medical oncologists and radiation oncologists, advanced practice providers (APPs), psychologists/social work, financial support services, fertility specialists, survivorship care, and advocates with AYA expertise that can help navigate the healthcare system. A strong AYA support system established early with targeted education and resources may influence treatment compliance and likelihood of long-term follow-up. Surveys of the AYA cancer population have identified areas of opportunity for the healthcare team to collaborate to identify needs, design interventions to meet them, and ultimately develop evidence-based guidelines that will enable us to offer AYAs with HL the quality care they deserve.
Collapse
|
8
|
Straus DJ, Długosz-Danecka M, Connors JM, Alekseev S, Illés Á, Picardi M, Lech-Maranda E, Feldman T, Smolewski P, Savage KJ, Bartlett NL, Walewski J, Ramchandren R, Zinzani PL, Hutchings M, Munoz J, Lee HJ, Kim WS, Advani R, Ansell SM, Younes A, Gallamini A, Liu R, Little M, Fenton K, Fanale M, Radford J. Brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy for stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (ECHELON-1): 5-year update of an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. LANCET HAEMATOLOGY 2021; 8:e410-e421. [PMID: 34048680 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(21)00102-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advances in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma with the introduction of PET-adapted regimens, practical challenges prevent more widespread use of these approaches. The ECHELON-1 study assessed the safety and efficacy of front-line A+AVD (brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) versus ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) in patients with stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma. The primary analysis showed improved modified progression-free survival with A+AVD. We present an updated analysis of ECHELON-1 at 5 years, an important landmark for this patient population. METHODS ECHELON-1 was an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 218 clinical sites, including hospitals, cancer centres, and community clinics, in 21 countries. Previously untreated patients (≥18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤2) with stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive A+AVD (brentuximab vedotin, 1·2 mg/kg of bodyweight, doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 of body surface area, vinblastine 6 mg/m2, and dacarbazine 375 mg/m2) or ABVD (doxorubicin 25 mg/m2, bleomycin 10 U/m2, vinblastine 6 mg/m2, and dacarbazine 375 mg/m2) intravenously on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to six cycles. Stratification factors included region (Americas vs Europe vs Asia) and International Prognostic Score risk group (low, intermediate, or high risk). The primary endpoint was modified progression-free survival; this 5-year update includes analysis of progression-free survival as per investigator assessment in the intention-to-treat population, which was an exploratory endpoint, although the 5-year analysis was not prespecified in the protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01712490) and EudraCT (2011-005450-60), and is ongoing. FINDINGS Between Nov 19, 2012, and Jan 13, 2016, 1334 patients were randomly assigned to receive A+AVD (n=664) or ABVD (n=670). At a median follow-up of 60·9 months (IQR 52·2-67·3), 5-year progression-free survival was 82·2% (95% CI 79·0-85·0) with A+AVD and 75·3% (71·7-78·5) with ABVD (hazard ratio [HR] 0·68 [95% CI 0·53-0·87]; p=0·0017). Among PET-2-negative patients, 5-year progression-free survival was higher with A+AVD than with ABVD (84·9% [95% CI 81·7-87·6] vs 78·9% [75·2-82·1]; HR 0·66 [95% CI 0·50-0·88]; p=0·0035). 5-year progression-free survival for PET-2-positive patients was 60·6% (95% CI 45·0-73·1) with A+AVD versus 45·9% (32·7-58·2) with ABVD (HR 0·70 [95% CI 0·39-1·26]; p=0·23). Peripheral neuropathy continued to improve or resolve over time with both A+AVD (375 [85%] of 443 patients) and ABVD (245 [86%] of 286 patients); more patients had ongoing peripheral neuropathy in the A+AVD group (127 [19%] of 662) than in the ABVD group (59 [9%] of 659). Fewer secondary malignancies were reported with A+AVD (19 [3%] of 662) than with ABVD (29 [4%] of 659). More livebirths were reported in the A+AVD group (n=75) than in the ABVD group (n=50). INTERPRETATION With 5 years of follow-up, A+AVD showed robust and durable improvement in progression-free survival versus ABVD, regardless of PET-2 status, and a consistent safety profile. On the basis of these findings, A+AVD should be preferred over ABVD for patients with previously untreated stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma. FUNDING Millennium Pharmaceuticals (a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company), and Seagen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Straus
- Department of Medicine, Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Monika Długosz-Danecka
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Kraków, Poland
| | - Joseph M Connors
- Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sergey Alekseev
- Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - Marco Picardi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Ewa Lech-Maranda
- Department of Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tatyana Feldman
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack Meridian Health School of Medicine, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | | | - Kerry J Savage
- Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nancy L Bartlett
- Washington University School of Medicine Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jan Walewski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, European Reference Network, Warszawa, Poland
| | | | - Pier Luigi Zinzani
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia Seràgnoli, Bologna, Italy; Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Università degli Studi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Martin Hutchings
- Department of Haematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Javier Munoz
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ, USA
| | - Hun Ju Lee
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Won Seog Kim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ranjana Advani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Anas Younes
- Department of Medicine, Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Andrea Gallamini
- Research Innovation and Statistics, Antoine-Lacassagne Cancer Centre, Nice, France
| | - Rachael Liu
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Meredith Little
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | - John Radford
- University of Manchester and the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hörster L, Neusser S, Trautner A, Pahmeier K, Lax H, Merkel-Jens A, Lehmann N, Jöckel KH, Baum J, Dührsen U, Wasem J, Neumann A. Kosten der Nachsorge von Patienten mit hämatologischen Neoplasien. GESUNDHEITSÖKONOMIE & QUALITÄTSMANAGEMENT 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1468-7124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Zusammenfassung
Zielsetzung Im Gegensatz zu hämatologischen Neoplasien im Kindesalter gibt es für Erwachsene mit diesen Erkrankungen wenige bis keine einheitlichen Nachsorgemuster und dementsprechend auch keine rational begründeten Nachsorgepläne. Des Weiteren wurden bislang keine Studien zu den mit der Nachsorge einhergehenden Kosten veröffentlicht. Die vorliegende Studie dient zur Erfassung des Ressourcenverbrauchs und der damit einhergehenden Kosten von erwachsenen Patienten.
Methodik Die Daten des Ressourcenverbrauchs wurden 2014 retrospektiv für die letzten 12 Monate mittels eines standardisierten Fragebogens erfasst. Die Krankheitskosten (direkte medizinische sowie indirekte Kosten) wurden aus der gesellschaftlichen Perspektive ermittelt. Das Jahr 2014 dient als Basisjahr für die Berechnung der Preise. Zur Ermittlung der indirekten Kosten (Erwerbsminderung, Arbeitsunfähigkeit) wurde der Friktionskostenansatz mit einer Friktionsperiode von 90 Tagen herangezogen. Weiterhin erfolgte ein Vergleich mit Hilfe des Humankapitalansatzes.
Ergebnisse Insgesamt nahmen 1531 Patienten an der gesundheitsökonomischen Erhebung teil. 89,4 % der Teilnehmer wiesen im Erfassungszeitraum mindestens einen ambulanten Arztkontakt auf. 235 Teilnehmern (15,3 %) wurde mindestens ein der Nachsorge zuzuordnendes Medikament verabreicht. 9,7 % der Studienteilnehmer gaben keinerlei Inanspruchnahme aufgrund von Nachsorge der Krebserkrankung an. Insgesamt ergaben sich direkte medizinische Kosten von durchschnittlich ca. 3627 € pro Patient. Die indirekten Krankheitskosten beliefen sich unter Verwendung des Friktionskostenansatzes auf ca. 165 € pro Patient.
Schlussfolgerung Arzneimittelkosten verursachen mit etwa 60 % den Großteil der direkten Nachsorgekosten bei Patienten mit hämatologischen Neoplasien. Nach der zugrundeliegenden Erkrankung aufgeschlüsselt weisen myeloproliferative Erkrankungen mit einem Anteil von fast 60 % die höchsten Gesamtkosten auf. Unter Verwendung des Friktionskostenansatzes lassen sich die Nachsorgekosten in 95,7 % direkte Kosten und 4,3 % indirekte Kosten unterteilen. 9,7 % der Studienteilnehmer geben keinerlei Inanspruchnahme aufgrund von Nachsorge der Krebserkrankung an und scheinen somit komplett durch das Nachsorgesystem zu fallen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Hörster
- Lehrstuhl für Medizinmanagement, Universität Duisburg-Essen
| | - Silke Neusser
- Lehrstuhl für Medizinmanagement, Universität Duisburg-Essen
| | | | | | - Hildegard Lax
- Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen
| | - Anja Merkel-Jens
- Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen
| | - Nils Lehmann
- Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen
| | - Karl-Heinz Jöckel
- Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen
| | - Julia Baum
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen
| | | | - Jürgen Wasem
- Lehrstuhl für Medizinmanagement, Universität Duisburg-Essen
| | - Anja Neumann
- Lehrstuhl für Medizinmanagement, Universität Duisburg-Essen
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Muhsen IN, Bar M, Savani BN, Estey EH, Hashmi SK. Follow-up issues in survivors of hematologic malignancies – Current stance and future perspectives. Blood Rev 2020; 44:100674. [DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2020.100674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2019] [Revised: 01/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
11
|
Amin MSA, Brunckhorst O, Scott C, Wrench D, Gleeson M, Kazmi M, Ahmed K. ABVD and BEACOPP regimens' effects on fertility in young males with Hodgkin lymphoma. Clin Transl Oncol 2020; 23:1067-1077. [PMID: 32944834 PMCID: PMC8084804 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02483-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Considering the increased cancer patient survivorship, the focus is now on addressing the impacts of treatment on quality of life. In young people, altered reproductive function is a major issue and its effects in young males are largely neglected by novel research. To improve clinician awareness, we systematically reviewed side effects of chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in young males. Methods The review was prospectively registered (PROSPERO N. CRD42019122868). Three databases (Medline via PUBMED, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library) were searched for studies featuring males aged 13-51-years who underwent chemotherapy for HL using ABVD (Adriamycin® (doxorubicin), bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) or BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisolone) regimens. These chemotherapy regimens were compared against each other using sperm characteristics, FSH, and inhibin B levels to measure fertility levels. Results Data were extracted from five studies featuring 1344 patients. 6 months post-ABVD saw marked deterioration in sperm count, further reduced by more cycles (P = 0.05). Patients treated with BEACOPP rather than ABVD were more prone to oligospermia. Receiving fewer cycles of both regimens increased the likelihood of sperm production recovering. Patients treated with 6-8 cycles of BEACOPP did not recover spermiogenesis. Conclusions ABVD and BEACOPP regimens significantly reduce fertility function to varying effects depending on treatment duration. ABVD temporarily causes significant reductions in male fertility, whereas BEACOPP’s effects are more permanent. Therefore, clinicians should discuss fertility preservation with male patients receiving infertility-inducing gonadotoxic therapy. Further high-quality studies are required to more adequality describe the risk to fertility by chemotherapy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12094-020-02483-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S A Amin
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - O Brunckhorst
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - C Scott
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - D Wrench
- Department of Haematology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Gleeson
- Department of Haematology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Kazmi
- Department of Haematology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - K Ahmed
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, SE1 9RT, UK. .,Department of Urology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a B cell lymphoma characterized by few malignant cells and numerous immune effector cells in the tumour microenvironment. The incidence of HL is highest in adolescents and young adults, although HL can affect elderly individuals. Diagnosis is based on histological and immunohistochemical analyses of tissue from a lymph node biopsy; the tissue morphology and antigen expression profile enable classification into one of the four types of classic HL (nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte-depleted or lymphocyte-rich HL), which account for the majority of cases, or nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL. Although uncommon, HL remains a crucial test case for progress in cancer treatment. HL was among the first systemic neoplasms shown to be curable with radiation therapy and multiagent chemotherapy. The goal of multimodality therapy is to minimize lifelong residual treatment-associated toxicity while maintaining high levels of effectiveness. Recurrent or refractory disease can be effectively treated or cured with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and prospective trials have demonstrated the potency of immunotherapeutic approaches with antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors. This Primer explores the wealth of information that has been assembled to understand HL; these updated observations verify that HL investigation and treatment remain at the leading edge of oncological research.
Collapse
|
13
|
Lang N, Crump M. PET-adapted approaches to primary therapy for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. Ther Adv Hematol 2020; 11:2040620720914490. [PMID: 32537115 PMCID: PMC7268111 DOI: 10.1177/2040620720914490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent results of randomized phase III studies of FDG-PET-adapted therapy for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) have clearly demonstrated benefit to alteration of treatment according to interim response, in particular regarding reducing toxicity while maintaining efficacy. However, these studies have differences in design including initial chemotherapy regimen, PET response criteria, patient populations enrolled, and inclusion of radiation, and report different results regarding efficacy and toxicities, which makes cross-trial comparisons difficult. Practitioners are presented with deciding which of these approaches will provide the optimum outcome, balancing toxicity and efficacy, and for which patient with advanced-stage HL. This review summarizes the observations reported from these trials and provides context to help guide physicians and patients in treatment decisions for advanced HL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noemie Lang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Crump
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, OPG 6-426, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hoppe RT, Advani RH, Ai WZ, Ambinder RF, Armand P, Bello CM, Benitez CM, Bierman PJ, Boughan KM, Dabaja B, Gordon LI, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Herrera AF, Hochberg EP, Huang J, Johnston PB, Kaminski MS, Kenkre VP, Khan N, Lynch RC, Maddocks K, McConathy J, McKinney M, Metzger M, Morgan D, Mulroney C, Rabinovitch R, Rosenspire KC, Seropian S, Tao R, Winter JN, Yahalom J, Burns JL, Ogba N. Hodgkin Lymphoma, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18:755-781. [PMID: 32502987 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) provide recommendations for the management of adult patients with HL. The NCCN panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant data, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. Current management of classic HL involves initial treatment with chemotherapy alone or combined modality therapy followed by restaging with PET/CT to assess treatment response. Overall, the introduction of less toxic and more effective regimens has significantly advanced HL cure rates. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines focuses on the management of classic HL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Weiyun Z Ai
- 2UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kirsten M Boughan
- 7Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | - Leo I Gordon
- 9Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | - Jiayi Huang
- 13Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | - Ryan C Lynch
- 18Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | - Kami Maddocks
- 19The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | - Monika Metzger
- 22St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Randa Tao
- 28Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | - Jane N Winter
- 9Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Silvestris E, Cormio G, Skrypets T, Dellino M, Paradiso AV, Guarini A, Minoia C. Novel aspects on gonadotoxicity and fertility preservation in lymphoproliferative neoplasms. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 151:102981. [PMID: 32485429 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The topic of fertility preservation in patients with a lymphoproliferative disease offers new aspects of debate, due to the introduction of novel chemotherapeutic regimens and small molecules in the clinical landscape. Cancer related infertility is mostly dependent on gonadotoxic treatments and fertile female patients are today addressed to the oocyte cryopreservation or to ovarian cortex fragment cryopreservation. These methods present advantages and disadvantages, which will be discussed in the present review, together with the options for male patients. The recent discovery of functional ovarian stem cells (OCSs) in woman ovarian cortex, opens new avenues offering a innovative procedure for fertility preservation through as model of regenerative medicine. Here, we review the gonadotoxic potential of "classical" chemotherapeutic treatments as well as of "novel" targeted therapies actually employed for lymphoproliferative neoplasms in young patients and revisit both the today available and future chances to preserve and restore fertility after the cancer healing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Silvestris
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" 70124 Bari, Italy.
| | - Gennaro Cormio
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" 70124 Bari, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
| | - Tetiana Skrypets
- Haematology Unit, National Cancer Center, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", viale O. Flacco 65, Bari, Italy; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
| | - Miriam Dellino
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" 70124 Bari, Italy.
| | - Angelo Virgilio Paradiso
- Institutional BioBank, Experimental Oncology and Biobank Management Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy.
| | - Attilio Guarini
- Haematology Unit, National Cancer Center, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", viale O. Flacco 65, Bari, Italy.
| | - Carla Minoia
- Haematology Unit, National Cancer Center, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", viale O. Flacco 65, Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Reid JH, Marini BL, Nachar VR, Brown AM, Devata S, Perissinotti AJ. Contemporary treatment options for a classical disease: Advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 148:102897. [PMID: 32109715 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Advanced classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a rare lymphoid disease characterized by the presence of Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells. Each year, cHL accounts for 0.5% of all new cancer diagnoses and about 80% are diagnosed with advanced stage disease. Given the significant improvement in cure rates, the focus of treatment has shifted towards minimization of acute and long-term toxicities. PET-adapted strategies have largely been adopted as standard of care in the United States in an attempt to balance toxicities with adequate lymphoma control. However, the appropriate upfront chemotherapy regimen (ABVD versus eBEACOPP) remains controversial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin H Reid
- Department of Pharmacy Services and Clinical Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine and the University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, 1540 E. Hospital Drive, CW 7-251B, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Bernard L Marini
- Department of Pharmacy Services and Clinical Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine and the University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, 1540 E. Hospital Drive, CW 7-251B, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Victoria R Nachar
- Department of Pharmacy Services and Clinical Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine and the University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, 1540 E. Hospital Drive, CW 7-251B, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Anna M Brown
- Department of Pharmacy Services and Clinical Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine and the University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, 1540 E. Hospital Drive, CW 7-251B, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Sumana Devata
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Anthony J Perissinotti
- Department of Pharmacy Services and Clinical Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine and the University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, 1540 E. Hospital Drive, CW 7-251B, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stephens DM, Li H, Schöder H, Straus DJ, Moskowitz CH, LeBlanc M, Rimsza LM, Bartlett NL, Evens AM, LaCasce AS, Barr PM, Knopp MV, Hsi ED, Leonard JP, Kahl BS, Smith SM, Friedberg JW. Five-year follow-up of SWOG S0816: limitations and values of a PET-adapted approach with stage III/IV Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2019; 134:1238-1246. [PMID: 31331918 PMCID: PMC6788007 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2019000719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) demonstrated excellent 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) after receiving positron emission tomography (PET)-adapted therapy on SWOG S0816. Patients received 2 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). Patients achieving complete response (CR) on PET scan following cycle 2 of ABVD (PET2) continued 4 additional cycles of ABVD. Patients not achieving CR on PET2 were switched to escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (eBEACOPP) for 6 cycles. After a median follow-up of 5.9 years, a subset of 331 eligible patients with central review of PET2 was analyzed. PET2 was negative in 82% and positive in 18%. For all patients, the estimated 5-year PFS and OS was 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69%-79%) and 94% (95% CI, 91%-96%), respectively. For PET2- and PET2+ patients, the 5-year PFS was 76% (95% CI, 70%-81%) and 66% (95% CI, 52%-76%), respectively. Seven (14%) and 6 (2%) patients reported second cancers after treatment with eBEACOPP and ABVD, respectively (P = .001). Long-term OS of HL patients treated on S0816 remains high. Nearly 25% of PET2- patients experienced relapse events, demonstrating limitations ABVD therapy and of the negative predictive value of PET2. In PET2+ patients who received eBEACOPP, PFS was favorable, but was associated with a high rate of second malignancies compared with historical controls. Our results emphasize the importance of long-term follow-up, and the need for more efficacious and less toxic therapeutic approaches for advanced-stage HL patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00822120.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah M Stephens
- Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Hongli Li
- SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | - Nancy L Bartlett
- Oncology Division, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Andrew M Evens
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | - Paul M Barr
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester NY
| | - Michael V Knopp
- Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | - Brad S Kahl
- Oncology Division, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Sonali M Smith
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Poorvu PD, Frazier AL, Feraco AM, Manley PE, Ginsburg ES, Laufer MR, LaCasce AS, Diller LR, Partridge AH. Cancer Treatment-Related Infertility: A Critical Review of the Evidence. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2019; 3:pkz008. [PMID: 31360893 PMCID: PMC6649805 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkz008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Revised: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer treatments may compromise the fertility of children, adolescents, and young adults, and treatment-related infertility represents an important survivorship issue that should be addressed at diagnosis and in follow-up to ensure optimal decision-making, including consideration of pursuing fertility preservation. Risk of infertility varies substantially with patient and treatment factors. The ability to accurately assess fertility risk for many patients is hampered by limitations of the current literature, including heterogeneity in patient populations, treatments, and outcome measures. In this article, we review and synthesize the available data to estimate fertility risks from modern cancer treatments for both children and adult cancer survivors to enable clinicians to counsel patients about future fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ann H Partridge
- Correspondence to: Ann H. Partridge, MD, MPH, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215-5450 (e-mail: .)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Interim Functional Imaging Is an Independent Predictor of Progression-free Survival in Advanced Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma - A Real-world Analysis. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2018; 19:e71-e79. [PMID: 30292737 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2018] [Revised: 07/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Response-adapted therapy in advanced classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) using interim functional imaging (IFI) is under active investigation. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively examined patients with advanced cHL receiving 2 front-line regimens stratified by IFI results at our institution. Time to endpoint analysis was estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier with log ranks. Cox regression modeling was computed for multivariable analysis. RESULTS A total of 124 patients with advanced cHL with a median follow up of 40.9 months were included. A total of 84 (67.7%) received ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine), whereas the remaining 40 (32.3%) received ABVD/eBEACOPP (escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone). A positive IFI was seen in 36 (29%) patients. The corresponding 3-year progression free survival (PFS) stratified by IFI was 81.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70.1%-88.8%) versus 48.3% (95% CI, 30.4%-64.1%) (P < .0001) for patients with negative or positive scan, respectively. Escalation to eBEACOPP from ABVD following a positive IFI resulted in a significantly higher 3-year PFS at 58.7% (95% CI, 0.3-0.79) versus 39.7% (95% CI, 0.18-0.61) respectively (P = .00015). Overall survival (OS) was similar across the groups (P = .44) irrespective of therapy received. At multivariable analysis, IFI was the only predictor of PFS with a hazard ratio of 4.6 (95% CI, 1.9-10.8; P = .0008) whereas therapy escalation had a hazard ratio of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.14-3.4; P = .62). CONCLUSION IFI is an independent predictor of PFS in advanced cHL and can guide therapeutic decisions in the real world. Given the inferior outcome seen in patients with a positive IFI, novel approaches of therapy are warranted.
Collapse
|
20
|
Damlaj M, El Fakih R, Hashmi SK. Evolution of survivorship in lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia: Metamorphosis of the field into long term follow-up care. Blood Rev 2018; 33:63-73. [PMID: 30093158 DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2018.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Revised: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Recent advancements in cancer care, coupled with early detection and an aging population have resulted in significant growth of cancer survivors. Long term follow up of such survivors is essential given the heightened risk for development of late effects such as secondary neoplasms, cardiovascular disease or psychosocial dysfunction among others. As more patients with hematologic malignancies are cured or managed over protracted periods of time, awareness of such issues is paramount for the practicing clinicians for optimal patient management. In this review, we describe the genesis of the field of cancer survivorship, and then it's gentle metamorphosis into multiple sub-fields currently by presenting literature relevant to late effects commonly seen in Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic leukemia and multiple myeloma. We will discuss the strengths and pitfalls of the existing models of survivorship care in hematologic malignancies and conclude with expert perspective on how to move the field forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moussab Damlaj
- Division of Hematology & HSCT, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Riad El Fakih
- Division of Adult Hematology & Stem Cell Transplantation, Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, s, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shahrukh K Hashmi
- Division of Adult Hematology & Stem Cell Transplantation, Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, s, Saudi Arabia; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Amitai I, Gurion R, Vidal L, Dann EJ, Raanani P, Gafter-Gvili A. PET-adapted therapy for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma - systematic review. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:765-772. [PMID: 29345517 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1426877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) performed after two chemotherapy cycles (PET-2) has become an accepted prognostic tool in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We evaluated the effect of PET-adapted strategy on outcome in advanced stage HL. METHODS In August 2017, we searched electronic databases, conference proceedings and ongoing trials. We included all studies in which treatment modification for advanced HL was performed based on the results of the interim PET scan. The primary analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS We identified 13 studies (4 RCTs, 7 phase II and 2 retrospective studies), conducted between 1999 and 2014, including 6856 patients. Of the four RCTS: one used therapy escalation, one did de-escalation and two trials performed both. Outcomes were assessed at different time point between 2 and 5 years. Three RCTs for de-escalating therapy, obtained similar outcomes despite reducing therapy, with a 2-year PFS of 88-92% (6 escalated BEACOPP (EB) vs. 4 ABVD cycles), a 5-year PFS of 91-92% (6/8 EB vs. 4 EB cycles) and a 5-year PFS of 80-82% (6 ABVD vs. omitting bleomycin after two successful ABVD cycles). Two RCTs implemented escalation. The randomization was between adding rituximab or not. In both trials, it did not affect outcome, with a 4-year PFS of 68-69% (addition of rituximab to BEACOPP after 2 ABVD cycles) and 5-year PFS of 88-90% (addition of rituximab to EB after 2 EB cycles). Performing true randomization between PET-adapted and a standard ABVD control arm was not feasible, given historical data. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review of PET-adapted therapy, mainly based on RCTs, suggests that a change to the treatment paradigm is appropriate in advanced HL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Amitai
- Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Ronit Gurion
- Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Liat Vidal
- Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Eldad J. Dann
- Department of Hematology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine Technion, Israel Technical Institute, Haifa, Israel
| | - Pia Raanani
- Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Anat Gafter-Gvili
- Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel
- Internal Medicine A, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shanbhag S, Ambinder RF. Hodgkin lymphoma: A review and update on recent progress. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:116-132. [PMID: 29194581 PMCID: PMC5842098 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 250] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Revised: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a unique hematopoietic neoplasm characterized by cancerous Reed-Sternberg cells in an inflammatory background. Patients are commonly diagnosed with HL in their 20s and 30s, and they present with supradiaphragmatic lymphadenopathy, often with systemic B symptoms. Even in advanced-stage disease, HL is highly curable with combination chemotherapy, radiation, or combined-modality treatment. Although the same doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine chemotherapeutic regimen has been the mainstay of therapy over the last 30 years, risk-adapted approaches have helped de-escalate therapy in low-risk patients while intensifying treatment for higher risk patients. Even patients who are not cured with initial therapy can often be salvaged with alternate chemotherapy combinations, the novel antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab, or high-dose autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The programmed death-1 inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab have both demonstrated high response rates and durable remissions in patients with relapsed/refractory HL. Alternate donor sources and reduced-intensity conditioning have made allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation a viable option for more patients. Future research will look to integrate novel strategies into earlier lines of therapy to improve the HL cure rate and minimize long-term treatment toxicities. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:116-132. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satish Shanbhag
- Assistant Professor of Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Richard F Ambinder
- Director, Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Professor of Oncology, Departments of Medicine and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gallamini A, Tarella C, Viviani S, Rossi A, Patti C, Mulé A, Picardi M, Romano A, Cantonetti M, La Nasa G, Trentin L, Bolis S, Rapezzi D, Battistini R, Gottardi D, Gavarotti P, Corradini P, Cimminiello M, Schiavotto C, Parvis G, Zanotti R, Gini G, Ferreri AJ, Viero P, Miglino M, Billio A, Avigdor A, Biggi A, Fallanca F, Ficola U, Gregianin M, Chiaravalloti A, Prosperini G, Bergesio F, Chauvie S, Pavoni C, Gianni AM, Rambaldi A. Early Chemotherapy Intensification With Escalated BEACOPP in Patients With Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma With a Positive Interim Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Scan After Two ABVD Cycles: Long-Term Results of the GITIL/FIL HD 0607 Trial. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:454-462. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.75.2543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after a risk-adapted treatment strategy that was based on a positive positron emission tomography scan performed after two doxorubicin, vinblastine, vincristine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) cycles (PET2). Patients and Methods Patients with advanced-stage (IIB to IVB) HL were consecutively enrolled. After two ABVD cycles, PET2 was performed and centrally reviewed according to the Deauville five-point scale. Patients with a positive PET2 were randomly assigned to four cycles of escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) followed by four cycles of standard BEACOPP with or without rituximab. Patients with a negative PET2 continued ABVD, and those with a large nodal mass at diagnosis (≥ 5 cm) in complete remission with a negative PET at the end of chemotherapy were randomly assigned to radiotherapy or no further treatment. The primary end point was 3-year PFS. Results Of 782 enrolled patients, 150 (19%) had a positive and 630 (81%) a negative PET2. The 3-year PFS of all patients was 82%. The 3-year PFS of those with a positive and negative PET2 was 60% and 87%, respectively ( P < .001). The 3-year PFS of patients with a positive PET2 assigned to BEACOPP with or without rituximab was 63% versus 57% ( P = .53). In 296 patients with both interim and post-ABVD–negative PET who had a large nodal mass at diagnosis, radiotherapy was randomly added after chemotherapy without a significant PFS improvement (97% v 93%, respectively; P = .29). The 3-year overall survival of all 782 patients was 97% (99% and 89% for PET2 negative and positive, respectively). Conclusion The PET-driven switch from ABVD to escalated BEACOPP is feasible and effective in high-risk patients with advanced-stage HL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Gallamini
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Corrado Tarella
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Simonetta Viviani
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Andrea Rossi
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Caterina Patti
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Antonino Mulé
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Marco Picardi
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Alessandra Romano
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Maria Cantonetti
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Giorgio La Nasa
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Livio Trentin
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Silvia Bolis
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Davide Rapezzi
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Roberta Battistini
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Daniela Gottardi
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Paolo Gavarotti
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Paolo Corradini
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Michele Cimminiello
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Corrado Schiavotto
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Guido Parvis
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Roberta Zanotti
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Guido Gini
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Andrés J.M. Ferreri
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Piera Viero
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Maurizio Miglino
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Atto Billio
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Abraham Avigdor
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Alberto Biggi
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Federico Fallanca
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Umberto Ficola
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Michele Gregianin
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Agostino Chiaravalloti
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Giuseppe Prosperini
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Fabrizio Bergesio
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Stephane Chauvie
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Chiara Pavoni
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Alessandro Massimo Gianni
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Alessandro Rambaldi
- Andrea Gallamini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Corrado Tarella, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia; Daniela Gottardi, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino; Paolo Gavarotti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin; Simonetta Viviani and Paolo Corradini, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Paolo Corradini, Alessandro Massimo Gianni, and Alessandro Rambaldi, Università degli Studi di Milano
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Balachandren N, Davies M. Fertility, ovarian reserve and cancer. Maturitas 2017; 105:64-68. [DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
25
|
Ciavarella S, Minoia C, Quinto AM, Oliva S, Carbonara S, Cormio C, Cox MC, Bravo E, Santoro F, Napolitano M, Spina M, Loseto G, Guarini A. Improving Provision of Care for Long-term Survivors of Lymphoma. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2017; 17:e1-e9. [PMID: 28916153 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.08.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Revised: 07/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The progressive improvement of lymphoma therapies has led to a significant prolongation of patient survival and life expectancy. However, lymphoma survivors are at high risk of experiencing a range of early and late adverse effects associated with the extent of treatment exposure. Among these, second malignancies and cardiopulmonary diseases can be fatal, and neurocognitive dysfunction, endocrinopathy, muscle atrophy, and persistent fatigue can affect patients' quality of life for decades after treatment. Early recognition and reduction of risk factors and proper monitoring and treatment of these complications require well-defined follow-up criteria, close coordination among specialists of different disciplines, and a tailored model of survivorship care. We have summarized the major aspects of therapy-related effects in lymphoma patients, reviewed the current recommendations for follow-up protocols, and described a new hospital-based model of survivorship care provision from a recent multicenter Italian experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabino Ciavarella
- Hematology and Cell Therapy Unit, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy.
| | - Carla Minoia
- Hematology and Cell Therapy Unit, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Angela Maria Quinto
- Hematology and Cell Therapy Unit, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Stefano Oliva
- Cardiology Unit, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Santa Carbonara
- Cardiology Unit, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Claudia Cormio
- Psycho-oncology Service, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Maria Christina Cox
- Hematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria "Sant'Andrea", Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Bravo
- Research Coordination and Support Service, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Santoro
- Research Coordination and Support Service, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Michele Spina
- IRCCS-Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Aviano, Italy
| | - Giacomo Loseto
- Hematology and Cell Therapy Unit, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Attilio Guarini
- Hematology and Cell Therapy Unit, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Skoetz N, Will A, Monsef I, Brillant C, Engert A, von Tresckow B. Comparison of first-line chemotherapy including escalated BEACOPP versus chemotherapy including ABVD for people with early unfavourable or advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 5:CD007941. [PMID: 28541603 PMCID: PMC6481581 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007941.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are two different international standards for the treatment of early unfavourable and advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL): chemotherapy with escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin/etoposide/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/procarbazine/prednisone) regimen and chemotherapy with ABVD (doxorubicin/bleomycin/vinblastine/dacarbazine) regimen. OBJECTIVES To determine the advantages and disadvantages of chemotherapy including escalated BEACOPP compared to chemotherapy including ABVD in the treatment of early unfavourable or advanced stage HL as first-line treatment. SEARCH METHODS We searched for randomised controlled trials in MEDLINE, CENTRAL and conference proceedings (January 1985 to July 2013 and for the update to March 2017) and Embase (1985 to November 2008). Moreover we searched trial registries (March 2017; www.controlled-trials.com, www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search, clinicaltrials.gov, www.eortc.be, www.ghsg.org, www.ctc.usyd.edu.au, www.trialscentral.org/index.html) SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials examining chemotherapy including at least two cycles of escalated BEACOPP regimens compared with chemotherapy including at least four cycles of ABVD regimens as first-line treatment for patients with early unfavourable stage or advanced stage HL. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The effect measures we used were hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and freedom from first progression.We used risk ratios (RRs) relative risks to analyse harms: treatment-related mortality, secondary malignancies (including myeloid dysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)), infertility and adverse events.Quality of life was not reported in any trial, therefore not analysed. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed quality of trials. MAIN RESULTS We screened 1796 records and identified five eligible trials in total i.e. one trial could be added on the previous review. These trials included only adults (16 to 65 years of age). We included all five trials with 3427 people in the meta-analyses: the HD9 and HD14 trials were co-ordinated in Germany, the HD2000 and GSM-HD trials were performed in Italy and the EORTC 20012 was conducted in Belgium. The overall risk of performance and detection bias was low for overall survival (OS), but was high for other outcomes, as therapy blinding was not feasible. The remaining 'Risk of bias' domains were low and unclear.All trials reported results for OS and progression-free survival (PFS). In contrast to the our first published review (2011) the addition of results from the EORTC 20012 BEACOPP escalated increases OS (3142 participants; HR 0.74 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.97; high-quality evidence). This means that only 90 (70 to 117) patients will die after five years in the BEACOPP escalated arm compared to 120 in the ABVD arm. This survival advantage is also reflected in an increased PFS with BEACOPP escalated (3142 participants; HR 0.54 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.64); moderate-quality evidence), meaning that after five years only 144 (121 to 168) patients will experience a progress, relapse or death in the BEACOPP escalated arm compared to 250 in the ABVD arm.There is no evidence for a difference for treatment-related mortality (2700 participants, RR 2.15 (95% CI = 0.93 to 4.95), low-quality evidence).Although the occurrence of MDS or AML may increase with BEACOPP escalated (3332 participants, RR 3.90 (95% CI 1.36 to 11.21); low-quality evidence)), there is no evidence for a difference between both regimens for overall secondary malignancies (3332 participants, RR 1.00 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.48), low-quality evidence). However, the observation time of the studies included in the review is too short to be expected to demonstrate differences with respect to second solid tumours which would not be expected to show significance until around 15 years after treatment.We are very uncertain how many female patients will be infertile due to chemotherapy and which arm might be favoured (106 participants, RR 1.37 (95% CI 0.83 to 2.26), very low-quality evidence). This is a very small sample, and the age of the patients was not detailed. No analysis of male fertility was provided.Five trials reported adverse events and the analysis shows that the escalated BEACOPP regimens probably causes more haematological toxicities WHO grade III or IV ((anaemia: 2425 participants, RR 10.67 (95% CI 7.14 to 15.93); neutropenia: 519 participants, RR 1.80 (95% CI 1.52 to 2.13); thrombocytopenia: 2425 participants, RR 18.12 (95% CI 11.77 to 27.92); infections: 2425 participants, RR 3.73 (95% CI 2.58 to 5.38), all low-quality evidence).Only one trial (EORTC 20012) planned to assess quality of life, however, no results were reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis provides moderate- to high-quality evidence that adult patients between 16 and 60 years of age with early unfavourable and advanced stage HL benefit regarding OS and PFS from first-line chemotherapy including escalated BEACOPP. The proven benefit in OS for patients with advanced HL is a new finding of this updated review due to the inclusion of the results from the EORTC 20012 trial. Furthermore, there is only low-quality evidence of a difference in the total number of secondary malignancies, as the follow-up period might be too short to detect meaningful differences. Low-quality evidence also suggests that people treated with escalated BEACOPP may have a higher risk to develop secondary AML or MDS. Due to the availability of only very low-quality evidence available, we are unable to come to a conclusion in terms of infertility. This review does for the first time suggest a survival benefit. However, it is clear from this review that BEACOPP escalated may be more toxic that ABVD, and very important long-term side effects of second malignancies and infertility have not been sufficiently analysed yet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Skoetz
- University Hospital of CologneCochrane Haematological Malignancies Group, Department I of Internal MedicineKerpener Str. 62CologneGermany50937
| | - Andrea Will
- University Hospital of CologneCochrane Haematological Malignancies Group, Department I of Internal MedicineKerpener Str. 62CologneGermany50937
| | - Ina Monsef
- University Hospital of CologneCochrane Haematological Malignancies Group, Department I of Internal MedicineKerpener Str. 62CologneGermany50937
| | - Corinne Brillant
- University Hospital of CologneCochrane Haematological Malignancies Group, Department I of Internal MedicineKerpener Str. 62CologneGermany50937
| | - Andreas Engert
- University Hospital of CologneDepartment I of Internal MedicineKerpener Str. 62CologneGermany50924
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- University Hospital of CologneDepartment I of Internal MedicineKerpener Str. 62CologneGermany50924
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Glimelius I, Eloranta S, Ekberg S, Chang ET, Neovius M, Smedby KE. Increased healthcare use up to 10 years among relapse-free Hodgkin lymphoma survivors in the era of intensified chemotherapy and limited radiotherapy. Am J Hematol 2017; 92:251-258. [PMID: 28006849 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2016] [Revised: 11/21/2016] [Accepted: 12/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
With today's excellent cure rates for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), the number of long-term survivors is increasing. This study aims to provide a global assessment of late adverse effects for working-age HL survivors treated with contemporary protocols (combination chemotherapy and limited radiotherapy). From Swedish nationwide registers we identified 1017 HL survivors diagnosed in 2000-2009, aged 18-60 years (median 32) and surviving at least one year post-diagnosis, and 4031 age-, sex-, and calendar-year-matched population comparators. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for outpatient visits and inpatient bed-days after the first year up to 14 years post-diagnosis (through 2013) were estimated across treatment subgroups, considering relapse-free time and using negative binomial regression. Scheduled outpatient visits for HL were excluded. The rate of outpatient visits was nearly double (IRR = 1.8, 95%CI: 1.6-2.0) that among comparators and higher rates persisted up to 10 years post-diagnosis. The rate of inpatient bed-days among relapse-free survivors was more than three-fold (IRR = 3.6, 95%CI: 2.7-4.7) that of comparators and the increase persisted up to four years post-diagnosis. Patients requiring 6-8 chemotherapy courses had higher rates of outpatient visits (IRR = 1.4, 95%CI: 1.1-1.7) and bed-days (IRR = 4.7, 95%CI: 2.9-7.8) than patients treated with 2-4 courses + radiotherapy. Previously seldom reported reasons for the excess healthcare use included chest pain, keratitis, asthma, diabetes mellitus, and depression. Contemporary treatment, chemotherapy in particular, was associated with excess healthcare use among HL survivors during the first decade postdiagnosis. The reasons for healthcare visits reflected a wide range of disorders, indicating the need of broad individualized care in addition to specific screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Glimelius
- Department of MedicineClinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University HospitalStockholm Sweden
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Clinical and Experimental OncologyUppsala University and Uppsala Akademiska Hospital Sweden
| | - Sandra Eloranta
- Department of MedicineClinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University HospitalStockholm Sweden
| | - Sara Ekberg
- Department of MedicineClinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University HospitalStockholm Sweden
| | - Ellen T. Chang
- Center for Epidemiology and Computational Biology, Health Sciences Practice, ExponentMenlo ParkCalifornia USA
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Research and PolicyStanford University School of MedicineStanford California USA
| | - Martin Neovius
- Department of MedicineClinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University HospitalStockholm Sweden
| | - Karin E. Smedby
- Department of MedicineClinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University HospitalStockholm Sweden
- Department of MedicineKarolinska University Hospital and Karolinska InstitutetStockholm Sweden
- Division of HematologyKarolinska University Hospital and Karolinska InstitutetStockholm Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Impact of Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma and their treatments on sperm aneuploidy: a prospective study by the French CECOS network. Fertil Steril 2017; 107:341-350.e5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2016] [Revised: 09/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
29
|
Ghobadi E, Moloudizargari M, Asghari MH, Abdollahi M. The mechanisms of cyclophosphamide-induced testicular toxicity and the protective agents. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2016; 13:525-536. [PMID: 28019118 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2017.1277205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cyclophosphamide (CP) is an alkylating antineoplastic agent with known toxicity to the male reproductive system. Areas covered: This review summarizes the known mechanisms by which CP exerts its toxic effects on the male reproductive system and the methods utilized to prevent such effects so that it could be further investigated and applied in clinical use. Keywords including ['Cyclophosphamide' AND 'male reproductive' OR' sperm toxicity' OR 'spermatotoxicity' OR 'infertility] were searched through Google Scholar, PubMed and Scopus databases based on PRISMA guidelines. After removing duplicates and irrelevant data, 76 papers were reviewed concerning the outcomes of treatment of male mice, rats, and humans with CP and the effects of co-administration of various natural and synthetic compounds on male reproductive system. Expert opinion: CP exerts its effect mainly by inducing oxidative stress and changing gene expression in spermatocytes variably during different stages of development. These effects could be either restored or prevented by the administration of compounds with antioxidant properties and those which target the biochemical alterations induced by CP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emad Ghobadi
- a Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy , Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran , Iran
| | - Milad Moloudizargari
- b Student Research Committee, Department of Immunology , School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences , Tehran , Iran
| | - Mohammad Hossein Asghari
- a Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy , Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran , Iran.,c Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine , Babol University of Medical Sciences , Babol , Iran
| | - Mohammad Abdollahi
- a Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy , Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran , Iran.,d Toxicology and Diseases Group, Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center , Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran , Iran
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Préservation de la fertilité chez les adolescents et jeunes adultes traités pour cancer. Bull Cancer 2016; 103:1019-1034. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2016.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2016] [Revised: 10/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
31
|
Ng AK, van Leeuwen FE. Hodgkin lymphoma: Late effects of treatment and guidelines for surveillance. Semin Hematol 2016; 53:209-15. [PMID: 27496313 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2016.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Long-term survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are at risk for a range of late effects, with second malignant neoplasm and cardiovascular diseases being the leading causes of death in these patients. The excess risks remain significantly elevated decades after treatment, and are clearly associated with extent of treatment exposures. Other late effects have also been identified, such as pulmonary dysfunction, endocrinopathies, muscle atrophy, and persistent fatigue. Systemic documentation of late effects and recognition of treatment- and patient-related risk factors are important, as they inform optimal surveillance and risk-reduction strategies, as well as guide therapeutic modifications in newly diagnosed patients to minimize treatment-related complications. As HL therapy evolves over time, with adoption of novel agents and contemporary treatment techniques, late effect risks and follow-up recommendations need to be continuously updated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea K Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Carde P, Karrasch M, Fortpied C, Brice P, Khaled H, Casasnovas O, Caillot D, Gaillard I, Bologna S, Ferme C, Lugtenburg PJ, Morschhauser F, Aurer I, Coiffier B, Meyer R, Seftel M, Wolf M, Glimelius B, Sureda A, Mounier N. Eight Cycles of ABVD Versus Four Cycles of BEACOPPescalated Plus Four Cycles of BEACOPPbaseline in Stage III to IV, International Prognostic Score ≥ 3, High-Risk Hodgkin Lymphoma: First Results of the Phase III EORTC 20012 Intergroup Trial. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:2028-36. [PMID: 27114593 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.64.5648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare patients with high-risk stage III to IV Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in the phase III European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 20012 Intergroup trial (Comparison of Two Combination Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Patients With Stage III or Stage IV Hodgkin's Lymphoma) who were randomly assigned to either doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) or to bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with clinical stage III or IV HL, International Prognostic Score of 3 or higher, and age 60 years or younger received ABVD for eight cycles (ABVD8) or escalated-dose BEACOPP (BEACOPPescalated) for four cycles followed by baseline BEACOPP (BEACOPPbaseline) for four cycles (BEACOPP4+4) without radiotherapy. Primary end points were event-free survival (EFS), treatment discontinuation, no complete response (CR) or unconfirmed complete response (CRu) after eight cycles, progression, relapse, or death. Secondary end points were CR rate, overall survival (OS), quality of life, secondary malignancies, and disease-free survival in CR/CRu patients. RESULTS Between 2002 and 2010, 549 patients were randomly assigned to ABVD8 (n = 275) or BEACOPP4+4 (n = 274). Other characteristics included median age, 35 years; male, 75%; stage IV, 74%; "B" symptoms, 81%; and International Prognostic Score ≥ 4, 59%. WHO performance status was 0 (34%), 1 (48%), or 2 (17%). Median follow-up was 3.6 years. CR/CRu was 82.5% in both arms. At 4 years, EFS was 63.7% for ABVD8 versus 69.3% for BEACOPP4+4 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.15; P = .312); disease-free survival was 85.8% versus 91.0% (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.06; P = .076), and OS was 86.7% versus 90.3% (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.21; P = .208). Death as a result of toxicity occurred in six and five patients, early discontinuation (before cycle 5) in 12 and 26 patients, treatment crossovers in five and 10 patients, and secondary malignancies in eight and 10 patients in the ABVD8 and BEACOPP4+4 arms, respectively. CONCLUSION ABVD8 and BEACOPP4+4 resulted in similar EFS and OS in patients with high-risk advanced-stage HL. Because BEACOPP4+4 did not demonstrate a favorable effectiveness or toxicity ratio compared with ABVD8, treatment burden, immediate and late toxicities, and associated costs must be considered before selecting one of these regimens on which to build future treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrice Carde
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Matthias Karrasch
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Catherine Fortpied
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pauline Brice
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hussein Khaled
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olivier Casasnovas
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Denis Caillot
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabelle Gaillard
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Serge Bologna
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christophe Ferme
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frank Morschhauser
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Igor Aurer
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bertrand Coiffier
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ralph Meyer
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matthew Seftel
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Max Wolf
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Sureda
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nicolas Mounier
- Patrice Carde and Christophe Ferme, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Pauline Brice, Hopital St. Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas and Denis Caillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Dijon, Dijon; Isabelle Gaillard, CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil; Serge Bologna, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHR) de Nancy, Nancy; Frank Morschhauser, CHR de Lille, Lille; Bertrand Coiffier, CHU de Lyon, Lyon; Nicolas Mounier, Hopital de L'Archet, Nice, France; Matthias Karrasch and Catherine Fortpied, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Hussein Khaled, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt; Pieternella Johanna Lugtenburg, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Igor Aurer, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Ralph Meyer, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Matthew Seftel, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Max Wolf, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Bengt Glimelius, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Anna Sureda, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Press OW, Li H, Schöder H, Straus DJ, Moskowitz CH, LeBlanc M, Rimsza LM, Bartlett NL, Evens AM, Mittra ES, LaCasce AS, Sweetenham JW, Barr PM, Fanale MA, Knopp MV, Noy A, Hsi ED, Cook JR, Lechowicz MJ, Gascoyne RD, Leonard JP, Kahl BS, Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Friedberg JW. US Intergroup Trial of Response-Adapted Therapy for Stage III to IV Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Early Interim Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography Imaging: Southwest Oncology Group S0816. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:2020-7. [PMID: 27069074 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.63.1119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 191] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Four US National Clinical Trials Network components (Southwest Oncology Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B/Alliance, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, and the AIDS Malignancy Consortium) conducted a phase II Intergroup clinical trial that used early interim fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging to determine the utility of response-adapted therapy for stage III to IV classic Hodgkin lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Southwest Oncology Group S0816 (Fludeoxyglucose F 18-PET/CT Imaging and Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Additional Chemotherapy and G-CSF in Treating Patients With Stage III or Stage IV Hodgkin Lymphoma) trial enrolled 358 HIV-negative patients between July 1, 2009, and December 2, 2012. A PET scan was performed after two initial cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) and was labeled PET2. PET2-negative patients (Deauville score 1 to 3) received an additional four cycles of ABVD, whereas PET2-positive patients (Deauville score 4 to 5) were switched to escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (eBEACOPP) for six cycles. Among 336 eligible and evaluable patients, the median age was 32 years (range, 18 to 60 years), with 52% stage III, 48% stage IV, 49% International Prognostic Score 0 to 2, and 51% score 3 to 7. RESULTS Three hundred thirty-six of the enrolled patients were evaluable. Central review of the interim PET2 scan was performed in 331 evaluable patients, with 271 (82%) PET2-negative and 60 (18%) PET2-positive. Of 60 eligible PET2-positive patients, 49 switched to eBEACOPP as planned and 11 declined. With a median follow-up of 39.7 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate for 2-year overall survival was 98% (95% CI, 95% to 99%), and the 2-year estimate for progression-free survival (PFS) was 79% (95% CI, 74% to 83%). The 2-year estimate for PFS in the subset of patients who were PET2-positive after two cycles of ABVD was 64% (95% CI, 50% to 75%). Both nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities were greater in the eBEACOPP arm than in the continued ABVD arm. CONCLUSION Response-adapted therapy based on interim PET imaging after two cycles of ABVD seems promising with a 2-year PFS of 64% for PET2-positive patients, which is much higher than the expected 2-year PFS of 15% to 30%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver W Press
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Hongli Li
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David J Straus
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Craig H Moskowitz
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michael LeBlanc
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lisa M Rimsza
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nancy L Bartlett
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Andrew M Evens
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Erik S Mittra
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ann S LaCasce
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John W Sweetenham
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Paul M Barr
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michelle A Fanale
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michael V Knopp
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ariela Noy
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eric D Hsi
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James R Cook
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mary Jo Lechowicz
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Randy D Gascoyne
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John P Leonard
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Brad S Kahl
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Bruce D Cheson
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Richard I Fisher
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jonathan W Friedberg
- Oliver W. Press, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington; Hongli Li and Michael LeBlanc, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Heiko Schöder, David J. Straus, Craig H. Moskowitz, and Ariela Noy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Leonard, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City; Paul M. Barr and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Lisa M. Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Nancy L. Bartlett and Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Andrew M. Evens, Tufts Medical Center; Ann S. LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Erik S. Mittra, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; John W. Sweetenham, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT; Michelle A. Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Michael V. Knopp, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Eric D. Hsi, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; James R. Cook, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Mary Jo Lechowicz, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; and Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Boltežar L, Pintarić K, Jezeršek Novaković B. Fertility in young patients following treatment for Hodgkin's lymphoma: a single center survey. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 33:325-333. [PMID: 26678493 PMCID: PMC4785158 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0636-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2015] [Accepted: 12/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the fertility rates following treatment by means of the BEACOPP regimen (regular and escalated) (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) as compared to the ABVD regimen (doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine, bleomycin) in Hodgkin lymphoma patients under the age of 40 at the time of treatment. Methods A questionnaire was sent to 180 Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. The questionnaire was composed of questions concerning reproduction and also menopausal and aging symptoms in females and males. The analyses were made using data collected from 123 patients (76 females and 47 males) who returned the questionnaire. All of the patients were treated between 1999 and 2012. Results In comparing the ABVD and BEACOPP groups of female patients, the frequency of the therapy-induced amenorrhea and the restored menses following treatment were found to be significantly different statistically (p = 0.002 and p = 0.012, respectively). The secondary amenorrhea statistically appeared more often in the BEACOPP group (p = 0.003) while the cases of achieving pregnancy and having children after chemotherapy were not significantly different (p = 0.630, p = 0.070, respectively). In comparing the ABVD and BEACOPP treatments in male patients, the only significant difference was in the number of artificially inseminated or in vitro pregnancies achieved in the BEACOPP and escalated BEACOPP group, p = 0.008 and p = 0.002, respectively. In total, 45.2 % of patients in the ABVD female group, 34.6 % in the BEACOPP female group, 52.6 % in the ABVD male group, and 33.3 % in the male BEACOPP group, respectively, of patients attempting conception post-therapy, had children after chemotherapy. Conclusions Based on these high rates of childbirth following BEACOPP chemotherapy, we have concluded that intensified chemotherapy is not a definite predictor of reduced fertility in young HL patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lučka Boltežar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Karlo Pintarić
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over the past several decades, Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has become a highly treatable lymphoid malignancy with excellent response rates and long-term disease-free survival. Late-toxicities, however, continue to be an area of significant concern. Recent studies have evaluated novel approaches to limit long-term toxicity without adversely impacting short-term survival. While early or interim PET scan has been correlated with PFS and OS in HL, the modification of therapy based on interim PET (response-adapted therapy) has been evaluated in retrospective and prospective cohorts. This paper will review evidence for the role of response-adapted therapy in HL. AREAS COVERED Data from completed and ongoing retrospective and prospective cohorts of HL patients were reviewed utilizing pubmed and clinicaltrials.org and pertinent studies culled to compile this review article. EXPERT OPINION While response-adapted therapy represents a promising area of research which may ultimately become standard-of-care, current data does not unequivocally endorse this approach, which should be used with caution outside of a clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Keller
- a 1 Washington University, Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine , St Louis, MO 63110, USA.,b 2 Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine , 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8056, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA +1 31 43 62 56 54 ; +1 31 44 54 79 41 ;
| | - Kenneth R Carson
- a 1 Washington University, Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine , St Louis, MO 63110, USA.,b 2 Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine , 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8056, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA +1 31 43 62 56 54 ; +1 31 44 54 79 41 ; .,c 3 Research Service, St. Louis Veterans Affairs Medical Center , 501 N. Grand Blvd Suite 300, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ng AK. Current survivorship recommendations for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma: focus on late effects. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2014; 2014:488-494. [PMID: 25696899 DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2014.1.488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Long-term survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are at an increased risk for a range of late complications, with subsequent malignant neoplasm and cardiovascular disease representing the 2 leading causes of death in these patients. Raising awareness, close follow-up, and adoption of selected early-detection and risk-reduction strategies may help to reduce the adverse impact of these late effects on patients. This chapter reviews known long-term complications of HL therapy, risk factors, and the timing of their occurrence. Where available, data on the efficacy of screening for selected late effects of HL are presented. Current evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations on follow-up of long-term HL survivors are also reviewed. As HL therapy evolves over time, late effects and implications on follow-up of patients treated in the contemporary era should be considered and opportunities for future research should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea K Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Current survivorship recommendations for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma: focus on late effects. Blood 2014; 124:3373-9. [DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-579193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractLong-term survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are at an increased risk for a range of late complications, with subsequent malignant neoplasm and cardiovascular disease representing the 2 leading causes of death in these patients. Raising awareness, close follow-up, and adoption of selected early-detection and risk-reduction strategies may help to reduce the adverse impact of these late effects on patients. This chapter reviews known long-term complications of HL therapy, risk factors, and the timing of their occurrence. Where available, data on the efficacy of screening for selected late effects of HL are presented. Current evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations on follow-up of long-term HL survivors are also reviewed. As HL therapy evolves over time, late effects and implications on follow-up of patients treated in the contemporary era should be considered and opportunities for future research should be explored.
Collapse
|
38
|
Ha CS, Hodgson DC, Advani R, Dabaja BS, Dhakal S, Flowers CR, Hoppe BS, Mendenhall NP, Metzger ML, Plastaras JP, Roberts KB, Shapiro R, Smith S, Terezakis SA, Winkfield KM, Younes A, Constine LS. ACR appropriateness criteria follow-up of Hodgkin lymphoma. J Am Coll Radiol 2014; 11:1026-1033.e3. [PMID: 25278496 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2014] [Accepted: 07/31/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The main objectives of follow-up studies after completion of treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma are detection of recurrence for salvage therapy and monitoring for sequelae of treatment. The focus of the follow-up shifts, with time after treatment, from detection of recurrence to long-term sequelae. A majority of recurrence is detected by history and physical examination. The yield for routine imaging studies and blood tests is low. Although routine surveillance CT scan can detect recurrence not detected by history and physical examination, its benefit in ultimate survival and cost-effectiveness is not well defined. Although PET scan is a useful tool in assessing response to treatment, its routine use for follow-up is not recommended. Long-term sequelae of treatment include secondary malignancy, cardiovascular disease, pneumonitis, reproductive dysfunction, and hypothyroidism. Follow-up strategies for these sequelae need to be individualized, as their risks in general depend on the dose and volume of radiation to these organs, chemotherapy, age at treatment, and predisposing factors for each sequela. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is either lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chul S Ha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
| | - David C Hodgson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ranjana Advani
- Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, California; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia
| | - Bouthaina S Dabaja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sughosh Dhakal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Christopher R Flowers
- Dept of Hematology & Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Nancy P Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Monika L Metzger
- Dept. of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia
| | - John P Plastaras
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth B Roberts
- Dept. of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Ronald Shapiro
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Sonali Smith
- University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; American Society of Hematology, Washington DC
| | - Stephanie A Terezakis
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Karen M Winkfield
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anas Younes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Meeneghan MR, Wood WA. Challenges for cancer care delivery to adolescents and young adults: present and future. Acta Haematol 2014; 132:414-22. [PMID: 25228567 DOI: 10.1159/000360241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Adolescents and young adults occupy a unique place within the cancer community due to the challenges they face related to disease biology, access to care, and psychosocial and socioeconomic circumstances. Efforts to define specific needs and targets for intervention in these areas are under way and evolving. This review will discuss the current and future challenges in delivering quality care to this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew R Meeneghan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Follows GA, Ardeshna KM, Barrington SF, Culligan DJ, Hoskin PJ, Linch D, Sadullah S, Williams MV, Wimperis JZ. Guidelines for the first line management of classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2014; 166:34-49. [PMID: 24712411 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- George A Follows
- Department of Haematology, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Teaching Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Eghbali H, Papaxanthos-Roche A. The impact of lymphoma and treatment on male fertility. Expert Rev Hematol 2014; 3:775-88. [DOI: 10.1586/ehm.10.70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
42
|
Mohammadnejad D, Abedelahi A, Rashtbar M. Protective Role of GnRH Antagonist on Chemotherapy-induced Spermatogenesis Disorder: A Morphological Study. Adv Pharm Bull 2013; 3:323-8. [PMID: 24312855 DOI: 10.5681/apb.2013.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2013] [Revised: 03/14/2013] [Accepted: 03/16/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Anti cancer drugs is one of the most important chemotherapeutic factors which can influence spermatogenesis process and germinal epithelium. Since dividing cells are mainly affected by anticancer drugs, the aim of the present study is to investigate the preventive effect of GnRH antagonist on spermatogenic defect produced by anticancer drugs. METHODS In the present study thirty adult male mice aging 6-8 weeks were divided into 3 groups as: Control, Experimental 1 and Experimental 2. Experimental 1 group received Cisplatin for 5 days as 2.5 mg/kg intraperitoneally and Experimental 2 group received 0.25 mg/kg cetrorelix (GnRH antagonist) one week before cisplatin treatment and continued for 3 weeks. The mice in all groups were sacrificed 35 days after the last injection and testis specimens were fixed in boueins, formaldehyde fixative and 2.5% Glutaraldehide then prepared for light and electron microscopic examination. RESULTS Light microscopy (LM) study showed that the number of spermatogonial cells, thickness of germinal epithelium, was decreased in Experimental 1group. Electron microscopy revealed that in this group several intercellular spaces appeared between spermatogenic cells and secretory granules in interstitial cells was increased. There were several vacuolated mitochondria and destroyed organelles in spermatogonial cells but in Experimental 2 group condition was similar to control group. CONCLUSION These results indicate that the cetrorelix administration before cancer treatment may protect germinal epithelium against side effects of cisplatin.
Collapse
|
43
|
Kostakoglu L, Gallamini A. Interim 18F-FDG PET in Hodgkin lymphoma: would PET-adapted clinical trials lead to a paradigm shift? J Nucl Med 2013; 54:1082-93. [PMID: 23818548 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.120451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a curable disease with currently available chemotherapy regimens. Major late morbidities can potentially be avoided in most limited-stage HL patients if the treatment can be adapted to the patient's early response profile. The therapy efficacy can also be increased early during therapy in nonresponding HL patients with the addition of involved-field radiation therapy or a switch to an escalated therapy protocol, particularly in advanced-stage or unfavorable-risk patients. (18)F-FDG PET is a well-established surrogate for tumor chemosensitivity early during therapy. The ongoing PET-adaptive clinical trials are testing the hypothesis that a decision can reliably be made on escalating or deescalating therapy based on interim PET results. Discussed in this review is the integral role of interim (18)F-FDG PET in HL, challenges, critical issues to improve its accuracy, and the observations from completed interim PET studies and ongoing PET-adaptive clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lale Kostakoglu
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York 10029, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Moscato T, Fedele R, Messina G, Irrera G, Console G, Martino M. Hematopoietic progenitor cells transplantation for recurrent or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2013; 13:1013-27. [PMID: 23586758 DOI: 10.1517/14712598.2013.779250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) has become a curable disease in the majority of patients. Despite this, about 20% of these patients relapsed or are primary refractory to the first-line treatment and high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous (Auto) hematopoietic progenitor cells transplantation (HPCT) are considered a therapeutic option. AREAS COVERED The authors reviewed HDC and HPCT treatment strategies in recurrent or refractory HL patients, with the goal of providing an overview of this approach. EXPERT OPINION Patients younger than 60-65 years with relapsed disease or refractory to first-line therapy should receive a second-line chemotherapy, followed by HDC and Auto-HPCT. Progression-free and overall survival results are significantly better when a second remission or a minimal disease status is achieved before Auto-HPCT, and demonstrate that this strategy is able to cure more than half of the advanced HL patients. Myeloablative allogeneic HPCT (Allo-HPCT) has been employed in advanced phases of the disease, but there have been significant concerns due to treatment-related mortality (TRM). The safety of allogeneic transplantation has improved with the use of reduced-intensity allogeneic (RIC-Allo) HPCT strategies. Despite early favorable results, mature results of RIC-Allo available in the literature are consistent in demonstrating a lack of long-term disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiziana Moscato
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera BMM, Via Melacrino n.1, 89100 Reggio Calabria, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Straus DJ. Long-term survivorship at a price: late-term, therapy-associated toxicities in the adult hodgkin lymphoma patient. Ther Adv Hematol 2013; 2:111-9. [PMID: 23556081 DOI: 10.1177/2040620711402414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
There have been an increasing number of survivors of successful treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) over the past 30 years. Although these survivors may be cured of their HL, long-term morbidity and mortality are associated with late toxicities of treatment. Identification of these late complications will lead to strategies to manage them when they occur and hopefully to decrease the risk of their development. Second malignancies followed by cardiovascular disease are the leading causes of late morbidity and mortality. Musculoskeletal difficulties, endocrine abnormalities including sterility and thyroid disease, heart and lung damage, persistent fatigue and psychosocial distress have also been seen. The subjects of this review are the late complications of primary treatment of HL and autologous stem cell transplantation, usually for relapsed disease.
Collapse
|
46
|
Burger IA, Vargas HA, Goldman DA, Gonen M, Kumar A, Zelenetz AD, Schöder H, Hricak H. The impact of systemic chemotherapy on testicular FDG activity in young men with Hodgkin's lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013; 40:701-7. [PMID: 23389428 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-012-2335-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2012] [Accepted: 12/25/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Based on prior reports suggesting a positive correlation between fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and total sperm count and concentration, we sought to identify changes in testicular FDG uptake over the course of chemotherapy in young men with Hodgkin's lymphoma. METHODS Fifty-two patients with a mean age of 24.2 years (range 15.5-44.4) at diagnosis monitored with FDG PET/CT to assess treatment response for Hodgkin's lymphoma were selected for this retrospective analysis under an Institutional Review Board waiver. Of the patients, 26 were treated with a chemotherapy regimen known to cause prolonged and sometimes permanent azoospermia (BEACOPP--bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisolone) and 26 with a regimen known to have a much milder effect on gonadal function (ABVD--doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, and dacarbazine). Each patient underwent one FDG PET/CT before treatment and at least one FDG PET/CT after start of chemotherapy. In all examinations, FDG activity was measured in the testes with different quantification metrics: maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, functional volume (FV) and total testicular glycolysis (TTG), and blood pool activity determined (SUVmean). RESULTS Testicular FDG uptake (SUVmax) was significantly associated with blood pool activity (p < 0.001). Furthermore, testicular FDG uptake metrics incorporating volume (e.g., FV and TTG) were associated with age. There was no significant change in SUVmax, SUVmean, FV, and TTG from the PET/CT at baseline to the PET/CTs over the course of chemotherapy either for patients treated with BEACOPP or for patients treated with ABVD. CONCLUSION For patients undergoing chemotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma, there is a significant association between testicular FDG uptake and blood pool activity, but no significant changes in FDG uptake over the course of chemotherapy. Therefore, FDG uptake may not be a feasible surrogate marker for fertility monitoring in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene A Burger
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Management of Hodgkin's lymphoma continues to develop. Outcomes for patients with favourable-risk, early-stage disease are excellent, and serial reductions in intensity of treatment have been made to retain the excellent prognosis while reducing the late effects of treatment. Prognosis is also very good in advanced-stage disease but the rate of relapse is higher than in early-stage disease, and the optimum first-line treatment is unclear. Workers are investigating the role of functional imaging to assess whether treatment can be tailored according to response, with the most intensive therapies reserved for patients predicted to have poor outcomes. In this Seminar we critically appraise the management of Hodgkin's lymphoma in early-stage disease, advanced-stage disease, and at relapse, with a focus on late effects of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Townsend
- Department of Haematology, University College London Medical School, Cancer Institute, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Morabito F, Hohaus S, Mammi C, Marcheselli L, Gentile M, Merli F, Montanini A, Stelitano C, La Sala A, Scalone R, Voso MT, Luminari S, Iannitto E, Gobbi P, Federico M. Role of glutathione-S-transferase (GST) polymorphisms in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma: results from the HD2000 GISL trial. Leuk Lymphoma 2012; 53:406-10. [PMID: 21916526 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2011.623254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Polymorphisms of the Glutathione-S Transferase (GST) family may influence the prognosis in lymphoma patients. We aimed to validate the impact of GSTT1 and GSTM1 deletions and of the GSTP1Ile105Val polymorphism on outcome and toxicity in 140 patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma enrolled in the prospective multicenter HD2000-GISL trial, comparing ABVD, BEACOPP and CEC regimens. Carriers of the GSTP1Ile105Val polymorphism had a higher rate of grade 3-4 anemia following treatment. Overall, our study failed to validate GST genotyping as prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS). Only the small cohort of patients with an international prognostic score (IPS) >3 and undeleted GSTT1 and/or GSTM1, treated with ABVD had worse progression-free survival (PFS) (GSTT1 + vs GSTT1-: HR 5.02, 95% C.I., 1.16-21.8, p = 0.031, GSTM1 + /GSTT1 + vs GSTM1-and/or GSTT1-: HR 4.61, 95% C.I. 1.28- 16.6, p = 0.019, respectively). No differences were observed for patients treated with intensified regimens, as BEACOPP and CEC. In conclusion, the prognostic role of GST polymorphism, if at all, is limited to a small subgroup of patients treated with standard ABVD regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fortunato Morabito
- UOC di Ematologia, Dipartimento Oncoematologico, Azienda Ospedaliera, Cosenza, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mohammadnejad D, Abedelahi A, Soleimani-Rad J, Mohammadi-Roshandeh A, Rashtbar M, Azami A. Degenerative effect of Cisplatin on testicular germinal epithelium. Adv Pharm Bull 2012; 2:173-7. [PMID: 24312789 DOI: 10.5681/apb.2012.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2012] [Accepted: 06/25/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The present study was designed to explore the effect of intraperitoneal administration of cisplatin in germinal epithelium of mice. There are few reports on the side effect of cisplatin on spermatogenesis when are used as anticancer drug. Therefore, in the present study the effect of cisplatin on spermatogenesis was evaluated by electron microscopy. METHODS Twenty balb/c mice aging 6-8 weeks was used in this study. The mice were divided into two groups, control and cysplatin treated. cysplatin was injected for five days as 2.5 mg /kg. The mice were sacrificed after 5 weeks and testicular specimens were removed, fixed in boueins, formaldeyd fixative and 2.5% Glutaraldehide then prepared for light and electron microscopic study. RESULTS Observation with optic microscope in treated group thickness of germinal epithelium was reduced a lot and increased the number of apoptotic cells. In some seminiferous tubules only sertoli cells were observed and nucleus of spermatogony cells was hetrochromatin. The electron microscopic observations showed some irregularity waviness and thickening in basal layer. Also myoid cells of this group were thick and contracted. In this group many apoptotic cells and damaged organelles were seen. CONCLUSION It was indicated that cisplatin affected testicular germinal epithelium by both cytotoxic effect and induction of apoptosis.
Collapse
|
50
|
Uhm J, Kuruvilla J. Treatment of newly diagnosed advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood Rev 2012; 26:167-74. [PMID: 22542250 DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2012.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
ABVD continues to be the standard of care for patients with advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) although escalated BEACOPP has improved survival in one randomized controlled trial (RCT). More intensive regimens have higher rates of acute and late toxicities and this poses significant issues for patients. Consolidation strategies such as radiation or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have not demonstrated an improvement in overall survival in RCTs. Novel technology and therapeutics are leading us to investigate new questions. Interim FDG-PET scanning is now being tested in prospective studies. Small, typically retrospective trials suggest that interim PET scans are independent markers of outcome and current trials are piloting the use of PET-adapted therapy. Targeted therapeutics have been evaluated in the relapsed and refractory setting and now show promising single agent activity. Agents including brentuximab vedotin (a conjugated anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody) and the histone deacetylase inhibitor panabinostat have reported encouraging single agent activity and a large study of brentuximab vedotin maintenance post ASCT is underway. Combination and maintenance trials are planned or ongoing in the primary treatment setting that will hopefully improve on the treatment standards of the past decade. This review will discuss the current standard of care in advanced stage HL, summarize some of the current data regarding interim FDG-PET scans and will conclude with some issues related to the development of new agents that are likely to be involved in the future standard of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jieun Uhm
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|