Monitoring unfractionated heparin in children: a parallel-cohort randomized controlled trial comparing 2 dose protocols

Comparison of Time Within Therapeutic Range Using Anti-Factor Xa Versus Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Monitoring of Unfractionated Heparin in Children

OBJECTIVE

To compare unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring using time in therapeutic range of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) versus anti-factor Xa activity (anti-Xa) in children.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review, with data between October 2015 and October 2019, included pediatric patients younger than 18 years on therapeutic UFH infusion with aPTT or anti-Xa monitoring. Patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, dialysis, concomitant anticoagulants, prophylactic UFH, no stated goal, and UFH administered for less than 12 hours were excluded. The primary outcome compared the percentage of time in therapeutic range between aPTT and anti-Xa. Secondary outcomes included time to first therapeutic value, UFH infusion rates, mean rate adjustments, and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients were included, with 33 aPTT patients and 32 anti-Xa patients, representing 39 UFH orders in each group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, with an overall mean age of 1.4 years and mean weight of 6.7 kg. The anti-Xa cohort demonstrated a statistically significantly higher percentage of time in therapeutic range compared with the aPTT group (50.3% vs 26.9%, p = 0.002). The anti-Xa group also demonstrated a trend toward decreased time to first therapeutic value compared with aPTT (14 vs 23.2 hours, p = 0.12). Two patients in each group experienced new or worsening thrombosis. Six patients in the aPTT cohort experienced bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated greater time was spent within therapeutic range for children receiving UFH monitored with anti-Xa compared with aPTT. Future studies should assess clinical outcomes in a larger population.

Anticoagulation in Pediatric Patients

Special aspects of anticoagulation in children include the different epidemiology of thrombosis, developmental changes in the coagulation system, age-dependent pharmacokinetics of anticoagulants, risk of bleeding, and practical hurdles to anticoagulation. The classical anticoagulants so far used in children have several limitations, resulting in the need for regular monitoring. The pharmacological properties of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and the special challenges of anticoagulation in children make the DOACs particularly attractive for children. All DOACs have pediatric development programs, targeting various indications for prevention and treatment of thrombosis. Child-appropriate formulations have been developed, age-specific dosing information generated, and safety and efficacy evaluated in ongoing phase 3 trials. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran have already been authorized for children for treatment of acute venous thrombosis and for extended secondary prevention. Their safety and efficacy have been demonstrated comparable to that of standard-of-care anticoagulants, without need for monitoring. Further studies are ongoing, which are expected to lead to pediatric authorizations of DOACs for primary venous thromboembolic event prevention in some high-risk settings. More real-life data will be necessary from postmarketing studies and registries to complement the evidence base for DOAC use in children, particularly in the youngest age groups and special disease populations.

Diagnostic Scores and Treatment Options for Acute Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Children

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a thrombo-hemorrhagic condition that commonly accompanies life-threatening illnesses in children and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment of underlying conditions, hemodynamic support, and replacement therapy with blood components is the mainstay of DIC management. Limited research studies have supported the use of antithrombin (AT), recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM), and protein C concentrates (PrCC). Although there have been several studies and advancements in the DIC treatment in adults, data in pediatric patients are limited, and the consensus is lacking. Evidence validating the use of diagnostic scoring systems in the pediatric population is also limited. Since the hemostatic system differs significantly in children, especially in neonates, management of DIC is also different in children from that of adults, and there is a dire need for good quality research studies in this aspect.

We reviewed more than 100 articles in PubMed, Cochrane database, and Google Scholar. This traditional review article discusses different scoring systems for diagnosing DIC in pediatric patients, and different pharmacological treatment options for acute DIC in this population. This study mainly focuses on papers published from 1990 to 2021 and includes papers in all languages involving humans only.

Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Venous Thromboembolism: New Therapies on the Horizon

ABSTRACT

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increasing in pediatric patients. Prompt recognition and evaluation of VTE in young patients could prevent significant morbidity or mortality. In contrast to VTE in adults, current treatment guidelines are largely based on expert opinion as limited randomized controlled trial data exist about the appropriate management in pediatric patients with traditional anticoagulants. However, recently approved direct-acting oral anticoagulants in adults are also being investigated in pediatric VTE and these data could inform future evidence-based treatment principles. Thus, healthcare providers must be well informed about the management of pediatric VTE and the data from these trials to date. This continuing medical education article will provide a summary of management of pediatric VTE with particular emphasis on emerging direct-acting oral anticoagulants.

Anti-Factor Xa-Based Monitoring of Unfractionated Heparin: Clinical Outcomes in a Pediatric Cohort

OBJECTIVES

To assess clinical outcomes in children treated with unfractionated heparin and monitored using an anti-factor Xa (Anti-FXa)-based nomogram. We also sought to assess the correlation between activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and Anti-FXa.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-center, observational cohort study conducted over a 20-month period that included all pediatric patients (<21 years) who received therapeutic unfractionated heparin and were monitored using an anti-FXa-based nomogram.

RESULTS

In total, 95 patients met prespecified inclusion criteria, and 1098 pairs of APTT and Anti-FXa measurements were performed. The median unfractionated heparin dose required to reach therapeutic Anti-FXa goal was significantly greater in infants compared with older children (P <.0001). The median time to achieve therapeutic Anti-FXa was 10 hours (range 2-96 hours) and was significantly shorter in patients who received a bolus compared with those who did not (P = .03). Five (5.3%) major bleeding events were noted. Age, peak Anti-FXa, peak APTT, lowest platelet count, and fibrinogen were not predictive of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeds. Moderate correlation between the APTT and Anti-FXa (r = 0.75; 95% CI 0.72-0.77) assays was appreciated.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an anti-FXa-based nomogram to monitor unfractionated heparin in children is feasible. Although moderate correlation was observed between the APTT and Anti-FXa assays, the APTT frequently overestimated heparin activity. Safety and efficacy of an Anti-FXa nomogram needs further validation.

Pediatric Replantation and Revascularization

Replantation and revascularization in the pediatric extremity has unique challenges that provide a fertile field of research and clinical experience. Children regenerate peripheral nerves rapidly, resulting in good sensory and motor function. They adapt well to functional deficits and mismatch errors of reinnervation. The technical aspects of microsurgical care in children can be challenging because the structures are small. Additional technical challenges include preservation of growth centers, prevention of vasospasm, protection of the reconstruction, and psychosocial care. Despite these challenges, children show excellent functional outcomes with minimal complications.

Management of thrombosis in children and neonates: practical use of anticoagulants in children

Venous thrombosis (VTE) in children and neonates presents numerous management challenges. Although increasing in frequency, VTE in children and neonates is still uncommon compared with adults. The epidemiology of VTE is vastly different in neonates vs children vs adolescents vs adults. In reality, pediatric thrombosis should be viewed as a multitude of rare diseases (eg, renal vein thrombosis, spontaneous thrombosis, catheter-related thrombosis, cerebral sinovenous thrombosis), all requiring different approaches to diagnosis and with different short- and long-term consequences, but linked by the use of common therapeutic agents. Further, children have fundamentally different physiology in terms of blood flow, developmental hemostasis, and, likely, endothelial function. The American Society of Hematology 2017 Guidelines for Management of Venous Thromboembolism: Treatment of Pediatric VTE provides up-to-date evidence-based guidelines related to treatment. Therefore, this article will focus on the practical use of therapeutic agents in the management of pediatric VTE, especially unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and oral vitamin K antagonists, as the most common anticoagulants used in children. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remain in clinical trials in children and should not be used outside of formal trials for the foreseeable future.

Anticoagulant Effects of Dabigatran in Paediatric Patients Compared with Adults: Combined Data from Three Paediatric Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

 Physiological age-related changes in the haemostatic and coagulation systems result in differing anticoagulant assay responses to standard anticoagulants. Therefore, we investigated the response of anticoagulant assays to dabigatran etexilate (DE) in children compared with adults.

OBJECTIVE

 This article assesses the relationship between plasma dabigatran concentration and coagulation assay results across age groups in children and adults.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 Data from three clinical trials in which children received DE following standard of care for venous thromboembolism were compared with data from adult clinical trials. The effects of dabigatran concentration on diluted thrombin time (dTT), ecarin clotting time (ECT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were analysed graphically and with modelling.

RESULTS

 The concentration-dTT relationships were consistent in children across all ages and adults in the graphical analysis. For ECT and aPTT, relationships based on ratios over baseline were similar across all ages; absolute clotting times showed that the same exposure resulted in longer clotting times in some of the children aged < 1 year versus adults. Modelling showed concentration-clotting time relationships for all three assays were largely comparable between adults and children, except in those aged < 2 months, in whom there was a slight upward shift in ECT and aPTT relative to adults.

CONCLUSION

 Results suggest that developmental haemostatic changes will have little impact on response to DE. However, further paediatric clinical trials assessing the relationship between coagulation assay responses and clinical outcomes will be needed to confirm this finding.

Development and Implementation of a Standardized Heparin Protocol for Left-Sided Pediatric Electrophysiology Procedures

Heparin is used to decrease the risk of thromboembolic complications during electrophysiology studies (EPS); however, there is wide practice variation and minimal evidence to guide heparin dosing, particularly in pediatric patients. This study retrospectively analyzed heparin dosing and response, measured via activated clotting time (ACT), in patients undergoing EPS and used these data (pre-protocol cohort, n = 40), as well as guidance from available literature to implement a standardized heparin protocol (phase 1, n = 43). We utilized quality improvement methodology to refine this protocol (phase 2, n = 40) to improve therapeutic heparin response. Prior to the protocol, patients achieved therapeutic ACT levels (250-350 s) only 35% of the time which improved to 60% during phase 1 (p < 0.05) and to 73% during phase 2 (p < 0.001 compared to pre-protocol). There were no thromboses or significant adverse events in any group. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of a standardized heparin protocol in achieving effective antithrombotic therapy during left-sided pediatric EPS.

Anticoagulant prophylaxis and therapy in children: current challenges and emerging issues

This review is aimed at describing the unique challenges of anticoagulant prophylaxis and treatment in children, and highlighting areas for research for improving clinical outcomes of children with thromboembolic disease. The evidence presented demonstrates the challenges of advancing the evidence base informing optimal management of thromboembolic disease in children. Recent observational studies have identified risk factors for venous thromboembolism in children, but there are few interventional studies assessing the benefit-risk balance of using thromboprophylaxis in risk-stratified clinical subgroups. A risk level-based framework is proposed for administering mechanical and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. More research is required to refine the assignment of risk levels. The anticoagulants currently used predominantly in children are unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonists. There is a paucity of robust evidence on the age-specific pharmacology of these agents, and their efficacy and safety for prevention and treatment of thrombosis in children. The available literature is heterogeneous, reflecting age-specific differences, and the various clinical settings for anticoagulation in children. Monitoring assays and target ranges are not well established. Nevertheless, weight-based dosing appears to achieve acceptable outcomes in most indications. Given the limitations of the classical anticoagulants for children, there is great interest in the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), whose properties appear to be particularly suitable for children. All DOACs currently approved for adults have Pediatric Investigation Plans ongoing or planned. These are generating age-specific formulations and systematic dosing information. The ongoing pediatric studies still have to establish whether DOACs have a positive benefit-risk balance in the various pediatric indications and age groups.

Risk Factors, Prophylaxis, and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Congenital Heart Disease Patients

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is a common condition in the pediatric population, affecting up to 1% of all live births (i.e., around 40,000 newborns/year in the United States). Although CHD does have a wide range of severity, by the age of 5 years approximately 80% of patients will require at least one surgical intervention to achieve a complete/palliative cardiac repair. Today, in light of their much-improved surgical survival, the care of these patients focuses on morbidity prevention and/or treatment. One such morbidity has been the increased frequency of thrombotic occlusions [e.g., cardioembolic arterial ischemic strokes; arterial, cardiac, and/or newly created shunt thrombosis; venous thromboembolism (VTE)]. Patients with CHD are at high risk of developing thrombosis due to the disruption of blood flow, CHD-related coagulopathy, inflammation, and/or platelet activation secondary to extracorporeal circulation support required during open-heart surgery or as a bridge to recovery, which can increase thrombus formation. In this article, we will discuss how the coagulation system is altered in patients with CHD in regard to the patient's anatomy, procedures they undergo to correct their congenital heart defect, and other risk factors that may increase their thrombotic risk, focusing on VTE. We will also discuss the most recently published reports pertaining to guidelines on prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in this population. Finally, we will briefly address the long-term VTE outcomes for patients with CHD.

Anti-activated factor II assay for monitoring unfractionated heparin in children: results of the HEARTCAT study

Essentials Unfractionated heparin has variable effects in children and therefore, monitoring is essential. A randomized controlled trial substudy investigating an anti-IIa assay in children was conducted. Anti-IIa values are lower in younger children, an effect more pronounced at low-dose heparin. Heparin effect on Xa and IIa is not equal, particularly in infants and after high-dose heparin.

SUMMARY

Background Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is used for the prophylaxis and treatment of thrombosis in children. Laboratory monitoring of UFH is needed to prevent over-anticoagulation or under-anticoagulation. Objectives To investigate the association between UFH dose and UFH effect as monitored with the anti-activated factor II (FIIa) assay, the relationship between anti-FIIa and anti-activated factor X (FXa) effects, and the influence of patient age and other factors on UFH effect. Patients and methods This was a randomized controlled trial in children during cardiac catheterization, comparing high-dose UFH (100 units kg-1 bolus) with low-dose UFH (50 units kg-1 bolus). Blood samples were drawn at baseline, and after 30 min, 60 min, and 90 min. For the purpose of this study, 49 children and 117 blood samples were evaluated. Results The anti-FIIa assay discriminated well between high-dose and low-dose UFH. Multiple regression demonstrated significant influences of UFH dose and age on anti-FIIa levels. Younger children had lower anti-FIIa levels than older children, an effect that was more pronounced with low-dose UFH. Anti-FXa/anti-FIIa ratios were equal with low-dose UFH. However, anti-FXa levels were relatively increased over anti-FIIa levels in infants and after high-dose UFH bolus administration. Conclusion The UFH effect on anti-FIIa levels is lower in infants than in older children. This influence of age appears to be dose-dependent, being more pronounced with low-dose UFH. Anti-FXa and anti-FIIa levels are not equal, particularly in infants and after high-dose UFH. Monitoring UFH solely with anti-FXa assays may not be sufficient in children, and the anti-FIIa assay may provide important complementary information.