Benefits and risks of JAK inhibition

A Phase I Trial Evaluating the Addition of Lenalidomide to Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Progressing on Ruxolitinib and Methylprednisolone

BACKGROUND

Ruxolitinib (RUX), an orally administered selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor, has received approval for the treatment of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and graft-versus-host disease. We have previously demonstrated the anti-multiple myeloma effects of RUX alone and in combination with the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide (LEN) and glucocorticosteroids both pre-clinically and clinically.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate whether LEN can achieve clinical activity among patients with multiple myeloma progressing on the combination of RUX and methylprednisolone (MP).

METHODS

In this part of a phase I, multicenter, open-label study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of RUX and MP for patients with multiple myeloma with progressive disease who had previously received a proteasome inhibitor, LEN, glucocorticosteroids, and at least three prior regimens; we also determined the safety and efficacy of adding LEN at the time of disease progression from the initial doublet treatment. Initially, all subjects received oral RUX 15 mg twice daily and oral MP 40 mg every other day. Those patients who developed progressive disease according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria then received LEN 10 mg once daily on days 1-21 within a 28-day cycle in addition to RUX and MP, which were administered at the same doses these patients were receiving at the time progressive disease developed.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine subjects (median age 64 years; 18 [62%] male) were enrolled in this part of the study and initially received the two-drug combination of RUX and MP. The median number of prior therapies was six (range 3-12). The overall response rate from this two-drug combination was 31% and the clinical benefit rate was 34%. The best responses were 1 very good partial response, 8 partial responses, 1 minor response, 12 stable disease, and 7 progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (range  0.5-36.2 months). The median time to response was 3.0 months. The median duration of response was 12.5 months (range 2.8-36.2 months). Twenty (69%) patients who showed progressive disease had LEN added to RUX and MP; all patients had prior exposure to LEN and all but one patient was refractory to their last LEN-containing regimen. After the addition of LEN, the overall response rate was 30% and the clinical benefit rate was 40%. The best responses of patients following the addition of LEN were 2 very good partial responses, 4 partial responses, 2 minor responses, 8 stable disease, and 4 progressive disease. The median time to response was 2.6 months (range 0.7-15.0 months). The median duration of response was not reached. The median progression-free survival following the addition of LEN was 3.5 months (range 0.3-25.9 months).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with multiple myeloma, treatment with RUX and MP is effective and well tolerated, and LEN can be used to extend the benefit of this RUX-based treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03110822, and is ongoing.

A case of T-cell-Epstein-Barr virus-haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and sustained remission following ruxolitinib therapy

Objectives

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a common cause of secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). While B cells are reservoirs for EBV, infection within T cells and NK cells in this disease can be difficult to treat.

Methods

A 19-year-old female presented with a 6-week history of coryzal symptoms on a background of Crohn's disease. On examination, she was febrile and tachycardic with mild tonsillar enlargement and splenomegaly. New trilineage cytopenias and elevation in liver enzymes were detected, with acute EBV subsequently confirmed on whole blood PCR. A diagnosis of EBV-associated HLH was supported further with elevated serum ferritin, triglycerides and soluble CD25, low fibrinogen and the presence of haemophagocytosis in the bone marrow.

Results

Corticosteroids, IVIG and rituximab were given, and anakinra was subsequently added due to ongoing fevers. EBV infection was then demonstrated within CD8⁺ T cells on EBER Flow-FISH assay. Ruxolitinib was commenced and her fevers abated on day 5, with improvement in other HLH parameters. She was discharged after a 39-day hospital admission. To date, she has remained in remission of HLH, despite developing COVID-19 infection during the convalescence phase of HLH.

Conclusion

EBV viraemia requires adequate treatment to control EBV-associated HLH as rituximab may be insufficient, and corticosteroid resistance can result in continued EBV infection in CD8⁺ T cells. This entity is known as T-cell-EBV-HLH. Ruxolitinib is a novel treatment strategy in this specific context and has several advantages, including inhibition of corticosteroid resistance to promote apoptosis of EBV-infected T cells.

Platelet transcriptome identifies progressive markers and potential therapeutic targets in chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms

Predicting disease progression remains a particularly challenging endeavor in chronic degenerative disorders and cancer, thus limiting early detection, risk stratification, and preventive interventions. Here, profiling the three chronic subtypes of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), we identify the blood platelet transcriptome as a proxy strategy for highly sensitive progression biomarkers that also enables prediction of advanced disease via machine-learning algorithms. The MPN platelet transcriptome reveals an incremental molecular reprogramming that is independent of patient driver mutation status or therapy. Subtype-specific markers offer mechanistic and therapeutic insights, and highlight impaired proteostasis and a persistent integrated stress response. Using a LASSO model with validation in two independent cohorts, we identify the advanced subtype MF at high accuracy and offer a robust progression signature toward clinical translation. Our platelet transcriptome snapshot of chronic MPNs demonstrates a proof-of-principle for disease risk stratification and progression beyond genetic data alone, with potential utility in other progressive disorders.

HMGA1, Moonlighting Protein Function, and Cellular Real Estate: Location, Location, Location!

The gene encoding the High Mobility Group A1 (HMGA1) chromatin remodeling protein is upregulated in diverse cancers where high levels portend adverse clinical outcomes. Until recently, HMGA1 was assumed to be a nuclear protein exerting its role in cancer by transcriptionally modulating gene expression and downstream signaling pathways. However, the discovery of an extracellular HMGA1-RAGE autocrine loop in invasive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines implicates HMGA1 as a "moonlighting protein" with different functions depending upon cellular location. Here, we review the role of HMGA1, not only as a chromatin regulator in cancer and stem cells, but also as a potential secreted factor that drives tumor progression. Prior work found that HMGA1 is secreted from TNBC cell lines where it signals through the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) to foster phenotypes involved in tumor invasion and metastatic progression. Studies in primary TNBC tumors also suggest that HMGA1 secretion associates with distant metastasis in TNBC. Given the therapeutic potential to target extracellular proteins, further work to confirm this role in other contexts is warranted. Indeed, crosstalk between nuclear and secreted HMGA1 could change our understanding of tumor development and reveal novel therapeutic opportunities relevant to diverse human cancers overexpressing HMGA1.

Burkitt leukemia with precursor B-cell features that developed after ruxolitinib treatment in a patient with hydroxyurea-refractory JAK2V617F-myeloproliferative neoplasm

A 62-year-old woman, who had a 16-year history of JAK2^V617F-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), developed Burkitt leukemia (BL) 16 months after treatment with ruxolitinib to control hydroxyurea-refractory conditions. BL cells were CD10⁺, CD19⁺, CD20⁻, CD34⁻, cytoplasmic CD79a⁺, and TdT⁺, and lacked surface immunoglobulins but expressed the cytoplasmic μ heavy chain. In the bone marrow, nuclear MYC⁺ BL cells displaced the MPN tissues. t(8;14)(q24;q32) occurred at a CG dinucleotide within MYC exon 1 and at the IGHJ3 segment, and an N-like segment was inserted at the junction. The V-D-J sequence of the non-translocated IGH allele had the unmutated configuration. DNA from peripheral blood at a time of the course of MPN exhibited homozygous JAK2^V617F mutation, while that at BL development included both JAK2^V617F and wild-type DNAs. Although the association between JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy for MPN and secondary development of aggressive B-cell neoplasm remains controversial, this report suggests that, in selected patients, close monitoring of clonal B-cells in the BM is required before and during treatment with JAK1/2 inhibitors.

Myeloproliferative and lymphoproliferative disorders: State of the art

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF), are clonal disorders complicated mainly by vascular events and transformation to myelofibrosis (for PV and ET) or leukemia. Although secondary malignancies, in particular, lymphoproliferative disorders (LPNs), are rare, they occur at a higher frequency than found in the general population, and there has been recent scientific discussion regarding a hypothetical relationship between treatment with JAK inhibitors in MPN and the risk of development of LPN. This has prompted increased interest regarding the coexistence of MPN and LPN. This review focuses on the role of JAK2 and the JAK/STAT pathway in MPN and LPN, whether there is a role for the genetic background in the occurrence of both MPN and LPN and whether there is a role for cytoreductive drugs in the occurrence of both MPN and LPN. Furthermore, whether an increased risk of lymphoma development is limited to patients who receive the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib, is a more general phenomenon that occurs following JAK1/2 inhibition or is associated with preferential JAK1 or JAK2 targeting is discussed.