Minimal residual disease undetectable by next-generation sequencing predicts improved outcome in CLL after chemoimmunotherapy

Acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab in relapsed/refractory CLL: final efficacy and ctDNA analysis of the CLL2-BAAG trial

ABSTRACT

The phase 2 CLL2-BAAG trial tested the measurable residual disease (MRD)-guided triple combination of acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab after optional bendamustine debulking in 45 patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). MRD was measured by flow cytometry (FCM; undetectable MRD <10-4) in peripheral blood (PB) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction of variable-diversity-joining (VDJ) rearrangements and CLL-related mutations in plasma. The median number of previous treatments was 1 (range, 1-4); 18 patients (40%) had received a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) and/or venetoclax before inclusion, 14 of 44 (31.8%) had TP53 aberrations, and 34 (75.6%) had unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region genes. With a median observation time of 36.3 months and all patients off-treatment for a median of 21.9 months, uMRD <10-4 in PB was achieved in 42 of the 45 patients (93.3%) at any time point, including 17 of 18 (94.4%) previously exposed to venetoclax/BTKi and 13 of 14 (92.9%) with TP53 aberrations. The estimated 3-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 85.0% and 93.8%, respectively. Overall, 585 paired FCM/ctDNA samples were analyzed and 18 MRD recurrences (5 with and 13 without clinical progression) occurred after the end of treatment. Twelve samples were first detected by ctDNA, 3 by FCM, and 3 synchronously. In conclusion, time-limited MRD-guided acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab achieved deep remissions in almost all patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. The addition of ctDNA-based analyses to FCM MRD assessment seems to improve early detection of relapses. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03787264.

Measurable Residual Disease and Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Measurable residual disease (MRD) refers to the presence of disease at low levels not detected by conventional pathologic analysis. The association of MRD status as a surrogate end point of clinical outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has not been established in the era of targeted agents. Assessing the association of MRD with progression-free survival (PFS) may improve its role as a surrogate marker and allow its use to accelerate drug development.

Objective

To assess the association between MRD and PFS in CLL using data from prospective clinical trials that studied targeted agents or obinutuzumab-based treatment.

Data Sources

Clinical studies on CLL were identified via searches of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception through July 31, 2023.

Study Selection

Prospective, single-arm, and randomized clinical trials that assessed targeted agents or obinutuzumab-based treatment and reported PFS by MRD status were included. Studies with insufficient description of MRD information were excluded.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Study sample size, median patient age, median follow-up time, line of treatment, MRD detection method and time points, and survival outcomes were extracted.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Analyses of survival probabilities and hazard ratios (HRs) were conducted for PFS according to MRD status. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.

Results

A total of 11 prospective clinical trials (9 randomized and 2 nonrandomized) including 2765 patients were analyzed. Achieving undetectable MRD (uMRD) at 0.01% was associated with an HR of 0.28 (95% CI, 0.20-0.39; P < .001) for PFS. Median PFS was not reached in both groups (uMRD vs MRD), but the estimated 24-month PFS was better in the uMRD group (91.9% [95% CI, 88.8%-95.2%] vs 75.3% [95% CI, 64.7%-87.6%]; P < .001). The association of uMRD with PFS was observed in subgroup analyses in the first-line treatment setting (HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.18-0.33), relapsed or refractory disease setting (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.16-0.71), and trials using time-limited therapy (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19-0.40).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that assessing MRD status as an end point in clinical trials and as a surrogate of PFS may improve trial efficiency and potentially allow for accelerated drug registration.

Defining treatment success in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: exploring surrogate markers, comorbidities, and patient-centered endpoints

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, the success of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment has been primarily assessed based on clinical outcomes, such as disease response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). However, the evolution of treatment approaches recognizes the importance of a patient-centered perspective that includes factors directly affecting patients' quality of life and overall well-being.

AREAS COVERED

Studies addressing the impact of targeted agents on improving either OS or other endpoint surrogates were selected using PubMed and MEDLINE platforms. Our search also included studies that considered patient-centric endpoints such as health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

EXPERT OPINION

The changing landscape of CLL treatment underscores the importance of continually exploring various endpoints to thoroughly define treatment success. Beyond conventional metrics such as OS and surrogate endpoints, namely, PFS, time to next treatment (TTNT), and measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment, it becomes crucial to integrate enhanced comorbidity evaluations and patient-centered viewpoints into a CLL success roadmap.Subsequent investigations ought to concentrate on enhancing current surrogate endpoints, discerning their contextual significance, and exploring innovative indicators of treatment efficacy and safety. Given the dynamic nature of CLL and the heterogeneity among patient groups, personalized strategies are essential, taking into account individual traits and patient preferences.

Molecular Disease Monitoring in Patients With Relapsed/refractory B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving Anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has improved the historically poor outcomes for relapsed and refractory (R/R) large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (LBCL). However, nearly 60% of patients will either fail to respond or relapse after CAR T-cell therapy. Currently, PET/CT scans are used to assess response. Cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is released by tumor cells into the peripheral blood and can be measured for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment.

METHODS

In this retrospective, IRB approved pilot study, archived lymphoma tissue and ctDNA from peripheral blood samples on day 0, 14, 28, 56, 90, 180, and 365 after CAR T-cell infusion from 10 patients with R/R NHL were collected for next-generation sequencing (NGS) of clonal variable-diversity-joining (VDJ) rearrangements (Adaptive biotechnologies [Seattle, WA]). Response was assessed by PET/CT on days 90 and 365 and graded according to the Lugano 2014 criteria. The primary endpoint was to determine the feasibility of detecting ctDNA to monitor disease response after anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. The secondary endpoint was to compare the sensitivity/specificity of MRD assessment from ctDNA to PET/CT imaging.

RESULTS

Nine out of 10 patients with a trackable sequence [median age 69 (range: 56-76); 55.6% male; median LDH 224], were included in this study. Each received tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) CAR T-cell therapy after median 2 prior treatments (range: 2-4). 7/9 patients had R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and 2/9 had transformed follicular lymphoma. At a median follow up of 12.7 months (range: 1.5-30 months), 4 patients were alive. By day 90, 3 patients (33.3%) achieved a radiographic complete response (CR) whilst 6 patients (66.6%) had progressive disease (PD). Detectable MRD on day 14 or day 28 had 83% sensitivity and 100% specificity for radiographic progression at any time before 1 year. For patients with PD, the median (interquartile range) MRD at day 0, 14, and 28 were 17.31 (1.01, 96.84), 9.12 (0.30, 18.8), and 23.77 (8.01, 137.53) copies per milliliter (mL), respectively. For patients with detectable MRD at day 28, mOS and mPFS were 6.7 and 1.3 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Monitoring MRD was a sensitive and specific method to detect poor response to tisa-cel. Additional studies evaluating MRD more frequently and with different products are warranted.

Monitoring Response and Resistance to Treatment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

The recent evolution in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) targeted therapies led to a progressive change in the way clinicians manage the goals of treatment and evaluate the response to treatment in respect to the paradigm of the chemoimmunotherapy era. Continuous therapies with BTK inhibitors achieve prolonged and sustained control of the disease. On the other hand, venetoclax and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies or, more recently, ibrutinib plus venetoclax combinations, given for a fixed duration, achieve undetectable measurable residual disease (uMRD) in the vast majority of patients. On these grounds, a time-limited MRD-driven strategy, a previously unexplored scenario in CLL, is being attempted. On the other side of the spectrum, novel genetic and non-genetic mechanisms of resistance to targeted treatments are emerging. Here we review the response assessment criteria, the evolution and clinical application of MRD analysis and the mechanisms of resistance according to the novel treatment strategies within clinical trials. The extent to which this novel evidence will translate in the real-life management of CLL patients remains an open issue to be addressed.

MRD-directed therapy in CLL: ready for prime time?

In recent years, the treatment paradigm for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has moved away from chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) toward the use of novel targeted agents. Commercially available drugs, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors and the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax, often used in combination with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, are now the mainstay of therapy both in the frontline and in relapsed settings. As the landscape for CLL management evolves, therapeutic endpoints need to be redefined. Detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) is a sensitive tool to identify disease burden following treatment with several therapeutic regimens in CLL (including CIT, venetoclax-based regimens, and cellular therapies), and it has demonstrated prognostic value. Despite recent advances, the utility of MRD-directed therapy and attempts to eradicate it in routine clinical practice remain debated. There is little comparative data from clinical trials on the best assay to determine undetectable MRD (U-MRD) and whether its monitoring can lead to changes in treatment strategies. Our review discusses the definitions of MRD, assays for its detection, and its impact on long-term survival outcomes for patients with a CLL diagnosis.

IGH rod-like tracer: An AlphaFold2 structural similarity extraction-based predictive biomarker for MRD monitoring in pre-B-ALL

Sequence variation resulting from the evolution of IGH clones and immunophenotypic drift makes it difficult to track abnormal B cells in children with precursor B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (pre-B-ALL) by flow cytometry, qPCR, or next-generation sequencing (NGS). The V-(D)-J regions of immunoglobulin and T cell receptor of 47 pre-B-ALL samples were sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq platform. The IGH rod-like tracer consensus sequence was extracted based on its rod-like alpha-helices structural similarity predicted by AlphaFold2. Additional data from published 203 pre-B-ALL samples were applied for validation. NGS-IGH (+) patients with pre-B-ALL had a poor prognosis. Consistent CDR3-coded protein structures in NGS-IGH (+) samples could be extracted as a potential follow-up marker for pre-B-ALL children during treatment. IGH rod-like tracer from quantitative immune repertoire sequencing may serve as a class of biomarker with significant predictive values for the dynamic monitoring of MRD in pre-B-ALL children.

Multiparameter flow cytometry and ClonoSEQ correlation to evaluate precursor B-lymphoblastic leukemia measurable residual disease

Measurable residual disease (MRD) detection for precursor B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has become the standard of care. However, the testing methodology has not been standardized. We aim to correlate COG multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and ClonoSEQ techniques to assess the test characteristics, to study abnormal immunophenotype for B-ALL MRD, and to observe B-ALL clonal evolution and the impact of blinatumomab therapy on MFC testing. MFC and molecular reports were retrieved from electronic medical records and data was reviewed. Included in this study were 74 bone marrow samples collected from 31 B-ALL patients at our institution between January 2021 and March 2022. COG MFC and ClonoSEQ results were concordant in 59/74 samples (80%) with positive concordant results in 12 samples (16%) and negative concordant results in 47 samples (64%). Discordant results were seen in 15/74 samples (20%), with 14 samples (19%) showing ClonoSEQ + /MFC- results and only 1 sample (1%) showing MFC + /ClonoSEQ- result. ClonoSEQ + /MFC- cases had MRD values ranging from 1 to 1400 cells/million nucleated cells with 86% of cases showing MRD values of < 100 cells/million nucleated cells. Newly identified dominant sequences were detected using ClonoSEQ in 2/31 patients (6%) during follow-up. All 14 bone marrow samples from 8 patients, who had gone through blinatumomab immunotherapy, were MRD negative by MFC, but 3 cases were MRD positive by ClonoSEQ. Our results show strong correlation between COG MFC and ClonoSEQ (r = 0.96), and both methods are complementary. Clonal evolution may occur, and blinatumomab immunotherapy may impact MFC B-ALL MRD evaluation.

Measurable Residual Disease in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Current Understanding and Evolving Role in Clinical Practice

OPINION STATEMENT

Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has evolved dramatically during the last decade, from chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)-based therapies to newer B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling targeting agents, which are sometimes given as continuous schemes. Response to treatment was traditionally defined according to clinical variables designed to assign a response category. Interest in assessing for deeper responses in CLL by the means of measurable residual disease (MRD) testing has been the subject of research during the last several years. Analyses and sub-analyses of clinical trials have shown that achieving undetectable MRD (uMRD) in CLL is an important prognostic factor. In this review, we summarize the available evidence about MRD in CLL, from the various assays available for measurement, the compartment to test, the impact of reaching uMRD according to the treatment regimen, and the results of fixed duration treatment guided by MRD trials. Finally, we summarize how MRD can be incorporated in clinical practice and how it may guide fixed duration treatment in the future should evidence continue to accumulate in that direction.

Ultrasensitive NGS MRD assessment in Ph+ ALL: Prognostic impact and correlation with RT-PCR for BCR::ABL1

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for BCR::ABL1 is the most common and widely accepted method of measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL); however, RT-PCR may not be an optimal measure of MRD in many cases of Ph+ ALL. We evaluated the clinical impact of a highly sensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS) MRD assay (sensitivity of 10^-6 ) and its correlation with RT-PCR for BCR::ABL1 in patients with Ph+ ALL. Overall, 32% of patients had a discordance between MRD assessment by RT-PCR and NGS, and 31% of patients who achieved NGS MRD negativity were PCR+ at the same timepoint. Among eight patients with long-term detectable BCR::ABL1 by PCR, six were PCR+/NGS-. These patients generally had stable PCR levels that persisted despite therapeutic interventions, and none subsequently relapsed; in contrast, patients who were PCR+/NGS+ had more variable PCR values that responded to therapeutic intervention. In a separate cohort of prospectively collected clinical samples, 11 of 65 patients (17%) with Ph+ ALL who achieved NGS MRD negativity had detectable BCR::ABL1 by PCR, and none of these patients relapsed. Relapse-free survival and overall survival were similar in patients who were PCR+/NGS- and PCR-/NGS-, suggesting that PCR for BCR::ABL1 did not provide additional prognostic information in patients who achieved NGS MRD negativity. NGS-based assessment of MRD is prognostic in Ph+ ALL and identifies patients with low-level detectable BCR::ABL1 who are unlikely to relapse nor to benefit from therapeutic interventions.

Current Landscape of Ancillary Diagnostic Testing in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukemia and is a heterogeneous disease with variable patient outcomes. A multidisciplinary technical evaluation, including flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, molecular and cytogenetic analyses, can comprehensively characterize a patient's leukemia at diagnosis, identify important prognostic biomarkers, and track measurable residual disease; all of which can impact patient management. This review highlights the key concepts, clinical significance, and main biomarkers detectable with each of these technical approaches; the contents are a helpful resource for medical practitioners involved in the workup and management of patients with CLL.

The evolving use of measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia clinical trials

Measurable residual disease (MRD) status in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), assessed on and after treatment, correlates with increased progression-free and overall survival benefit. More recently, MRD assessment has been included in large clinical trials as a primary outcome and is increasingly used in routine practice as a prognostic tool, a therapeutic goal, and potentially a trigger for early intervention. Modern therapy for CLL delivers prolonged remissions, causing readout of traditional trial outcomes such as progression-free and overall survival to be inherently delayed. This represents a barrier for the rapid incorporation of novel drugs to the overall therapeutic armamentarium. MRD offers a dynamic and robust platform for the assessment of treatment efficacy in CLL, complementing traditional outcome measures and accelerating access to novel drugs. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of recent major clinical trials of CLL therapy, focusing on small-molecule inhibitors and monoclonal antibody combinations that have recently emerged as the standard frontline and relapse treatment options. We explore the assessment and reporting of MRD (including novel techniques) and the challenges of standardization and provide a comprehensive review of the relevance and adequacy of MRD as a clinical trial endpoint. We further discuss the impact that MRD data have on clinical decision-making and how it can influence a patient's experience. Finally, we evaluate how upcoming trial design and clinical practice are evolving in the face of MRD-driven outcomes.

Measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is defined as the presence of residual cancer cells after treatment in patients with clinically undetectable disease, who would otherwise be considered in complete remission. It is a highly sensitive parameter which indicates the disease burden and predicts survival in this setting of patients. In recent years, MRD has gained a role in many hematological malignancies as a surrogate endpoint for clinical trials: undetectable MRD has been correlated to longer progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). New drugs and combinations have been developed with the aim to achieve MRD negativity, which would indicate favorable prognosis. Different methods to measure MRD have also been devised, which include flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next generation sequencing (NGS), with different sensitivity and accuracy in evaluating deep remission after treatment. In this review, we will analyze the current recommendations for the detection of MRD, with particular focus on its role in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), as well as the different detection methods. Moreover, we will discuss the results of clinical trials and the role of MRD in new therapeutic schemes with inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. MRD is not currently used in the clinical practice to evaluate response to treatment, due to technical and economical limitations, but it's gaining more and more interest in trials settings, especially since the introduction of venetoclax. The use of MRD in trials will likely be followed by a broader practical application in the future. The aim of this work is to provide a reader-friendly summary of the state of art in the field, as MRD will soon become an accessible tool to evaluate our patients, predict their survival and guide physician's therapeutic choices and preferences.

Detecting measurable residual disease beyond 10-4 by an IGHV leader-based NGS approach improves prognostic stratification in CLL

The sensitivity of conventional techniques for reliable quantification of minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is limited to MRD 10-4. Measuring MRD <10-4 could help to further distinguish between patients with CLL with durable remission and those at risk of early relapse. We herein present an academically developed immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable (IGHV) leader-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay for the quantification of MRD in CLL. We demonstrate, based on measurements in contrived MRD samples, that the linear range of detection and quantification of our assay reaches beyond MRD 10-5. If provided with sufficient DNA input, MRD can be detected down to MRD 10-6. There was high interassay concordance between measurements of the IGHV leader-based NGS assay and allele-specific oligonucleotide quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (r = 0.92 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.86-0.96]) and droplet digital PCR (r = 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.96]) on contrived MRD samples. In a cohort of 67 patients from the CLL11 trial, using MRD 10-5 as a cutoff, undetectable MRD was associated with superior progression-free survival (PFS) and time to next treatment. More important, deeper MRD measurement allowed for additional stratification of patients with MRD <10-4 but ≥10-5. PFS of patients in this MRD range was significantly shorter, compared with patients with MRD <10-5 (hazard ratio [HR], 4.0 [95% CI, 1.6-10.3]; P = .004), but significantly longer, compared with patients with MRD ≥10-4 (HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.23-0.87]; P = .018). These results support the clinical utility of the IGHV leader-based NGS assay.

Molecular Monitoring of Lymphomas

Molecular monitoring of tumor-derived alterations has an established role in the surveillance of leukemias, and emerging nucleic acid sequencing technologies are likely to similarly transform the clinical management of lymphomas. Lymphomas are well suited for molecular surveillance due to relatively high cell-free DNA and circulating tumor DNA concentrations, high somatic mutational burden, and the existence of stereotyped variants enabling focused interrogation of recurrently altered regions. Here, we review the clinical scenarios and key technologies applicable for the molecular monitoring of lymphomas, summarizing current evidence in the literature regarding molecular subtyping and classification, evaluation of treatment response, the surveillance of active cellular therapies, and emerging clinical trial strategies.

Patient specific real-time PCR in precision medicine - Validation of IG/TR based MRD assessment in lymphoid leukemia

Detection of patient- and tumor-specific clonally rearranged immune receptor genes using real-time quantitative (RQ)-PCR is an accepted method in the field of precision medicine for hematologic malignancies. As individual primers are needed for each patient and leukemic clone, establishing performance specifications for the method faces unique challenges. Results for series of diagnostic assays for CLL and ALL patients demonstrate that the analytic performance of the method is not dependent on patients' disease characteristics. The calibration range is linear between 10^-1 and 10^-5 for 90% of all assays. The detection limit of the current standardized approach is between 1.8 and 4.8 cells among 100,000 leukocytes. RQ-PCR has about 90% overall agreement to flow cytometry and next generation sequencing as orthogonal methods. Accuracy and precision across different labs, and above and below the clinically applied cutoffs for minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) demonstrate the robustness of the technique. The here reported comprehensive, IVD-guided analytical validation provides evidence that the personalized diagnostic methodology generates robust, reproducible and specific MRD data when standardized protocols for data generation and evaluation are used. Our approach may also serve as a guiding example of how to accomplish analytical validation of personalized in-house diagnostics under the European IVD Regulation.

Flow cytometric evaluation of measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Where do we stand?

Measurable residual disease (MRD) has emerged as a relevant parameter of response to therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Although several methods have been developed, flow cytometry has emerged as the most useful and standardized approach to measure and quantify MRD. The improved sensitivity of MRD measurements has been paralleled by the development of more effective therapeutic strategies for CLL, increasing the applicability of MRD detection in this setting. Chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy have firstly demonstrated their ability to obtain a deep MRD. Combined targeted therapies are also demonstrating a high molecular response rate and prospective trials are exploring the role of MRD to guide the duration of treatment in this setting. In this review we briefly summarize what we have learned about MRD with emphasis on its flow cytometric detection.

CD160 receptor in CLL: Current state and future avenues

CD160 is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored cell surface glycoprotein expressed on cytotoxic natural killer (NK) cells and T-cell subsets. It plays a crucial role in the activation of NK-cell cytotoxicity and cytokine production. It also modulates the immune system and is involved in some pathologies, such as cancer. CD160 is abnormally expressed in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but not expressed in normal B lymphocytes. Its expression in CLL enhances tumor cell proliferation and resistance to apoptosis. CD160 is also a potential prognostic marker for the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in CLL, which is important for the clinical management of CLL, the prevention of disease relapse, and the achievement of complete remission. In this review, we present an overview of CD160 and its involvement in the pathophysiology of CLL. We also discuss its use as a prognostic marker for the assessment of MRD in CLL.

Circulating Tumor DNA-Based MRD Assessment in Patients with CLL Treated with Obinutuzumab, Acalabrutinib, and Venetoclax

PURPOSE

With the advent of highly efficacious time-limited combination treatments of targeted agents in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment has gained importance as a measure for therapeutic success and as a surrogate for progression-free survival. The currently most widely used method is multicolor flow cytometry, which detects circulating CLL cells in the peripheral blood. However, it seems to be less sensitive for the detection of MRD in the lymph node compartment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To evaluate whether a cell-free approach can overcome this limitation, we performed serial assessments of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with CLL treated with obinutuzumab, acalabrutinib, and venetoclax in the phase II CLL2-BAAG trial. Patient-specific variability, diversity, joining (VDJ) rearrangements as well as somatic driver mutations were tracked before, during and after treatment by digital droplet PCR in blood plasma. Furthermore, these were systematically compared to matched flow cytometry data.

RESULTS

In the 381 sample pairs, ctDNA and flow cytometry yielded highly concordant results. However, clone-specific ctDNA was detected in 44 of 152 samples (29%) that were assessed as undetectable MRD (uMRD) by flow cytometry (defined as less than one CLL cell in 10,000 normal leukocytes). 29 ctDNA-negative samples showed detectable MRD >10-4 by flow cytometry. Also, somatic driver mutations were detected with a similar sensitivity compared with patient-specific VDJ rearrangements in plasma. In patients with predominantly nodal residual disease, ctDNA compared favorably with 4-color flow cytometry and seemed to more accurately reflect the entire disease burden across compartments.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of these findings, ctDNA-based MRD assessment appears to be a promising method to complement cell-based MRD approaches like flow cytometry that focus on circulating CLL cells in the peripheral blood.

Enduring undetectable MRD and updated outcomes in relapsed/refractory CLL after fixed-duration venetoclax-rituximab

The MURANO trial (A Study to Evaluate the Benefit of Venetoclax Plus Rituximab Compared With Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [CLL]; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier #NCT02005471) reported superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with venetoclax-rituximab (VenR) vs bendamustine-rituximab (BR) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL. Patients were randomized to 2 years of VenR (n = 194; rituximab for the first 6 months) or 6 months of BR (n = 195). Although undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) was achieved more often with VenR, the long-term implications of uMRD with this fixed-duration, chemotherapy-free regimen have not been explored. We report MRD kinetics and updated outcomes with 5 years' follow-up. Survival benefits with VenR vs BR were sustained (median PFS [95% confidence interval]: 53.6 [48.4, 57.0] vs 17.0 [15.5, 21.7] months, respectively, P < .0001; 5-year OS [95% confidence interval]: 82.1% [76.4, 87.8] vs 62.2% [54.8, 69.6], P < .0001). VenR was superior to BR, regardless of cytogenetic category. VenR-treated patients with uMRD at end of treatment (EOT; n = 83) had superior OS vs those with high-MRD+ (n = 12): 3-year post-EOT survival rates were 95.3% vs 72.9% (P = .039). In those with uMRD at EOT, median time to MRD conversion was 19.4 months. Of 47 patients with documented MRD conversion, 19 developed progressive disease (PD); median time from conversion to PD was 25.2 months. A population-based logistic growth model indicated slower MRD median doubling time post-EOT with VenR (93 days) vs BR (53 days; P = 1.2 × 10-7). No new safety signals were identified. Sustained survival, uMRD benefits, and durable responses support 2-year fixed-duration VenR treatment in R/R CLL.

Minimal/Measurable Disease Analysis in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma by Flow Cytometry

CLL/SLL is the most common leukemia in the western world. The disease is indolent; however, most patients require treatment at some point of the disease course. Outside of allogeneic transplants, the treatment is rarely curative but often controls CLL/SLL manifestations for many years. Several lines of therapy may be used sequentially to prolong clinical remission. Because of the prolonged disease course, CLL/SLL monitoring represents a sizable portion of the workload in a typical flow cytometry laboratory involved in the diagnosis and monitoring of hematopoietic neoplasms. Minimal/measurable disease monitoring of CLL/SLL has emerged as a key component in treatment monitoring and sequencing. In the face of effective therapies, clinical laboratories are tasked with monitoring ever smaller proportions of MRD with high precision and accuracy. With the recent addition of surface antigen-targeting biologics such as antibodies and CAR-T cells, the task has become more complex due to the unavailability of commonly analyzed antigens for flow cytometric analysis. This article details a flow cytometric test developed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center that has proven to consistently achieve high sensitivity (<0.01% of nucleated cells) in the bone marrow and peripheral blood, even when CD19 is lost or unavailable for analysis. Moreover, the test helps distinguish between CLL and other CD5-positive B cell neoplasms. The Basic Protocol provides a detailed operational procedure for processing, staining, and cytometric acquisition of samples. The Support Protocol provides typical steps and caveats for MRD data analysis in CLL/SLL and in distinguishing CLL/SLL from other B cell neoplasms and normal CD5-positive B cells. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Processing, staining, and cytometric analysis of bone marrow or peripheral blood cells for MRD analysis of CLL/SLL Support Protocol: Analysis and interpretation of CLL MRD assay.

Lower access to risk stratification tests and drugs, and worse survival of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients treated in public as compared to private hospitals in Brazil: A retrospective analysis of the Brazilian registry of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) has a highly variable clinical course. In addition to biological factors, socioeconomic factors and health system characteristics may influence CLL outcome. Data from the Brazilian Registry of CLL were analyzed to compare clinical and treatment‐related characteristics in patients with CLL, from public or private institutions. A total of 3326 patients from 43 centres met the eligibility criteria, of whom 81% were followed up at public hospitals and 19% at private hospitals. The majority were male (57%), with a median age of 65 years. Comparing public and private hospitals, patients in public hospitals were older, had more advanced disease at diagnosis, and more frequently had elevated creatinine levels. All investigated prognostic markers were evaluated more often in private hospitals. First‐line treatment was predominantly based on chlorambucil in 41% of the cases and fludarabine in 38%. Anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody was used in only 36% of cases. In public hospitals, significantly fewer patients received fludarabine‐based regimens and anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Patients from public hospitals had significantly worse overall survival (71% vs. 90% for private hospitals, p < 0.0001) and treatment‐free survival (32% vs. 40%, for private hospitals, p < 0.0001) at seven years. Our data indicate striking differences between patients followed in public and private hospitals in Brazil. A worse clinical condition and lack of accessibility to basic laboratory tests and adequate therapies may explain the worse outcomes of patients treated in public institutions.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Version 3.2022

The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) has significantly evolved in recent years. Targeted therapy with Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors has emerged as an effective chemotherapy-free option for patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL. Undetectable minimal residual disease after the end of treatment is emerging as an important predictor of progression-free and overall survival for patients treated with fixed-duration BCL-2 inhibitor-based treatment. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the updates to the NCCN Guidelines for CLL/SLL specific to the use of chemotherapy-free treatment options for patients with treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory disease.

Ibrutinib, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and obinutuzumab (iFCG) regimen for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with mutated IGHV and without TP53 aberrations

Chemoimmunotherapy with combined fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) has been an effective treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We initiated a phase II trial for previously untreated patients with CLL with mutated IGHV and absence of del(17p)/TP53 mutation. Patients received ibrutinib, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and obinutuzumab (iFCG) for three cycles. Patients who achieved complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete count recvoery (CRi) with marrow undetectable measurable residual disease (U-MRD) received additional nine cycles of ibrutinib with three cycles of obinutuzumab; all others received nine additional cycles of ibrutinib and obinutuzumab. Patients in marrow U-MRD remission after cycle 12 discontinued all treatment, including ibrutinib. Forty-five patients were treated. The median follow-up is 41.3 months. Among the total 45 treated patients, after three cycles, 38% achieved CR/CRi and 87% achieved marrow U-MRD. After cycle 12, the corresponding numbers were 67% and 91%, respectively. Overall, 44/45 (98%) patients achieved marrow U-MRD as best response. No patient had CLL progression. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 98% and 98%, respectively. Per trial design, all patients who completed cycle 12 discontinued ibrutinib, providing for a time-limited therapy. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 58% and 40% patients, respectively. The iFCG regimen with only 3 cycles of chemotherapy is an effective, time-limited regimen for patients with CLL with mutated IGHV and without del(17p)/TP53 mutation.

Measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: expert review and consensus recommendations

Assessment of measurable residual disease (often referred to as "minimal residual disease") has emerged as a highly sensitive indicator of disease burden during and at the end of treatment and has been correlated with time-to-event outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Undetectable-measurable residual disease status at the end of treatment demonstrated independent prognostic significance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, correlating with favorable progression-free and overall survival with chemoimmunotherapy. Given its utility in evaluating depth of response, determining measurable residual disease status is now a focus of outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia clinical trials. Increased adoption of measurable residual disease assessment calls for standards for nomenclature and outcomes data reporting. In addition, many basic questions have not been systematically addressed. Here, we present the work of an international, multidisciplinary, 174-member panel convened to identify critical questions on key issues pertaining to measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, review evaluable data, develop unified answers in conjunction with local expert input, and provide recommendations for future studies. Recommendations are presented regarding methodology for measurable residual disease determination, assay requirements and in which tissue to assess measurable residual disease, timing and frequency of assessment, use of measurable residual disease in clinical practice versus clinical trials, and the future usefulness of measurable residual disease assessment. Nomenclature is also proposed. Adoption of these recommendations will work toward standardizing data acquisition and interpretation in future studies with new treatments with the ultimate objective of improving outcomes and curing chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

BTK Inhibitors Combined With Chemoimmunotherapy in CLL - The Best of Both Worlds?

Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) remains a standard-of-care in many regions for first line (1L) therapy of CLL. In fit patients, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) has the advantage of achieving undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) with time-limited treatment and prolonged treatment-free remissions with a plateau on the PFS curve, but have several limitations, most notably the inferior PFS and survival outcomes for patients with unmutated IGHV compared to ibrutinib + rituximab seen in the E1912 study and a risk for long-term toxicities such as therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Given the nonoverlapping toxicity profile with CIT and its efficacy in patients with high risk genomics, ibrutinib is a potentially useful agent to combine with CIT, with the aim of achieving deep and durable remissions, with time-limited treatment. Three recent phase 2 studies have combined ibrutinib with chemoimmunotherapy, utilizing different approaches in terms of patient selection, sequencing and duration of therapy and choice of monoclonal antibody. These studies all demonstrated favorable toxicity profiles and higher rates of undetectable MRD than with any other previously utilized 1L regimen. This review will focus on this novel treatment approach in CLL.

Cell therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: Transplants and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells

There is substantial progress in the therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), much of it the result of new drug development. As such the definition of high-risk CLL is changing. Nevertheless, few persons with CLL are cured with current therapy. Two types of cell therapies of CLL are currently being evaluated or re-evaluated in the context of these advances: haematopoietic cell transplants and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cells. We discuss the potential role of these cell therapies in the context of the evolving therapy topography of CLL including how these therapies work and who, if anyone, is an appropriate candidate for cell therapy.

Assessment of Clonotypic Rearrangements and Minimal Residual Disease in Lymphoid Malignancies: A Large Cancer Center Experience Using clonoSEQ

CONTEXT.—

Measurable (minimal) residual disease (MRD) is an independent prognostic factor for survival outcomes in patients with lymphoid and plasma cell malignancies and has been incorporated into consensus criteria regarding treatment response, strategy, and clinical trial endpoints. clonoSEQ (a next-generation sequencing [NGS]-MRD assay) uses multiplex polymerase chain reaction and NGS to identify clonotypic rearrangements at the immunoglobulin (Ig) H, IgK, IgL, T-cell receptor (TCR)-β, and TCR-γ loci, and translocated B-cell lymphoma 1/IgH and 2/IgH sequences for MRD assessment. Additionally, it can be used to confirm diagnoses of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).

OBJECTIVE.—

To review the technical aspects of our experience using the clonoSEQ Assay in routine clinical practice.

DESIGN.—

In this single-center experience, 390 patients with lymphoid and plasma cell malignancies were assessed with the NGS-MRD Assay at a central laboratory.

RESULTS.—

Median time from arrival of the shipment to initiation of the assay (defined as captured in Adaptive's secure tracking system) was 2.1 hours. Overall, 317 patients had 1 or more samples submitted for sequence identification. Of these, 290 (91.5%) had trackable sequences identified. The median calibration rate of samples by malignancy (where n ≥ 10 samples, excluding CTCL samples) was 88.1%, across a variety of fresh and archived sample sources (177 of 201 samples). TCR-β and/or TCR-γ clonotypes were identified in 40 of 95 samples (42.1%) from 66 patients with suspected CTCL.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This NGS-MRD Assay is a valuable and sensitive tool for monitoring MRD in patients with plasma cell and lymphoid malignancies and assisting in the diagnosis of CTCL.

The Biology of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications

ABSTRACT

The high degree of clinical heterogeneity of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is influenced by the disease molecular complexity. Genetic studies have allowed to better understand CLL biology and to identify molecular biomarkers of clinical relevance. TP53 disruption represents the strongest prognosticator of chemorefractoriness and indicates the use of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) and BCL2 inhibitors. Unmutated IGHV (immunoglobulin heavy variable) genes also predict refractoriness to chemoimmunotherapy; importantly, when treated with B-cell receptor inhibitors or BCL2 inhibitors, IGHV unmutated patients display an outcome similar to that of IGHV mutated CLL. Before choosing treatment, a comprehensive assessment of TP53 and IGHV status is recommended by all guidelines for CLL clinical management. In case of fixed-duration therapeutic strategies, monitoring of minimal residual disease may provide a tool to decide treatment duration. The current precision medicine management of CLL patients might be further improved by the adoption of novel biomarkers that are emerging as clinically meaningful for this disease.

Will New Drugs Replace Transplants for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia?

Transplants have been used to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) for more than 35 years. Use has been restricted to <1 percent of highly selected persons typically failing concurrent conventional therapies. As therapies of CLL have evolved, so have indications for transplantation and transplant techniques. The data that we review indicate that transplants can result in long-term leukemia-free survival in some persons but are associated with substantial transplant-related morbidity and mortality. We discuss the mechanisms underlying the anti-leukemia effects of transplants including drugs, ionizing radiations, immune-mediated mechanisms and/or a combination. We discuss prognostic and predicative covariates for transplant outcomes. Importantly, we consider whether there is presently a role of transplants in CLL and who, if anyone, is an appropriate candidate in the context of new drugs.

A 10-color flow cytometry panel for diagnosis and minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Diagnosis and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) by flow cytometry currently requires multiple antibody panels. We added CD23 and CD200 to the EuroFlow^TM lymphoid screening tube (LST) to create a 10-color modified LST (mLST) capable of diagnosing typical CLL in a single tube. We then explored if the mLST could be used for MRD by comparing its performance to the European Research Initiative on CLL (ERIC) panel using spiked cryopreserved and fresh patient samples. Over 1 year of use in our clinical laboratory, the mLST diagnosed CLL without further immunophenotyping in 56% of samples with an abnormal clone. There was good agreement in MRD results between the mLST and ERIC panels. Therefore, the mLST can streamline CLL diagnosis by reducing technician time and the number of panels required. It may have the potential to screen for MRD in laboratories without access to dedicated panels (ERIC).

Perspective: sensitive detection of residual lymphoproliferative disease by NGS and clonal rearrangements-how low can you go?

Malignant lymphoproliferative disorders collectively constitute a large fraction of the hematological cancers, ranging from indolent to highly aggressive neoplasms. Being a diagnostically important hallmark, clonal gene rearrangements of the immunoglobulins enable the detection of residual disease in the clinical course of patients down to a minute fraction of malignant cells. The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has provided unprecedented assay specificity, with a sensitivity matching that of polymerase chain reaction-based measurable residual disease (MRD) detection down to the 10^-6 level. Although reaching 10^-6 to 10^-7 is theoretically feasible, employing a sufficient amount of DNA and sequencing coverage is placed in the perspective of the practical challenges when relying on clinical samples in contrast to controlled serial dilutions. As we discuss, the randomness of subsampling must be taken into account to accommodate the sensitivity threshold-in terms of both the required number of cells and sequencing coverage. As a substantial part of the reviewed studies do not state the depth of coverage or even amount of DNA in some cases, we call for increased transparency to enable critical assessment of the MRD assays for clinical implementation and feasibility.

The future of laboratory testing in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is a malignant lymphoproliferative disorder characterised by the accumulation of dysfunctional B-lymphocytes in the blood and lymphoid tissues. It is a clonally complex disease with a high degree of both intra-tumoural and inter-patient heterogeneity. This variability leads to a wide range of clinical outcomes and highlights the critical need for accurate prognostic tests in CLL. With the advent of a range of new targeted agents for CLL in recent years, there is also a clinical need for improved predictive tests to therapy. This review of laboratory testing in CLL focuses on emerging technologies for prognostication including single nucleotide polymorphism microarray for karyotypic analysis, targeted next generation sequencing analysis of the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene as well as genes recurrently mutated in the disease such as TP53, and detection of minimal residual disease.

Measurable residual disease in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Treatment outcomes of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have improved since chemoimmunotherapy and novel drugs became available for CLL treatment; therefore, more sensitive methods to evaluate residual CLL cells in patients are required. Measurable residual disease (MRD) has been assessed in several clinical trials on CLL using flow cytometry, real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) with allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) primers, and high-throughput sequencing. MRD assessment is useful to predict the treatment outcomes in the context of chemotherapy and treatment with novel drugs such as venetoclax. In this review, we discuss major techniques for MRD assessment, data from relevant clinical trials, and the future of MRD assessment in CLL treatment.

Reading the B-cell receptor immunome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: revelations and applications

B-Cell receptor (BCR) sequencing has been the force driving many recent advances in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) research. Here, we discuss the general principles, revelations, and applications of reading the BCR immunome in the context of CLL. First, IGHV mutational status, obtained by measuring the mutational imprint on the IGHV gene of the CLL clonotype, is the cornerstone of CLL risk stratification. Furthermore, the discovery of "BCR-stereotyped" groups of unrelated patients that share not only a highly similar BCR on their leukemic clone, but also certain clinical characteristics has provided insights key to understanding disease ontogeny. Additionally, whereas the BCR repertoire of most CLL patients is characterized by a single dominant rearrangement, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revealed a rich subclonal landscape in a larger than previously expected proportion of CLL patients. We review the mechanisms underlying these "multiple dominant" cases, including V(D)J-recombination errors, failure of allelic exclusion, intraclonal diversification, and "true" bi- or oligoclonality, and their implications, in detail. Finally, BCR repertoire sequencing can be used for sensitive quantification of minimal residual disease to potentially unprecedented depth. To surmount pitfalls inherent to this approach and develop internationally harmonized protocols, the EuroClonality-NGS Working Group has been established.

Advances in the assessment of minimal residual disease in mantle cell lymphoma

The clinical impact of minimal residual disease detection at early time points or during follow-ups has been shown to accurately predict relapses among patients with lymphomas, mainly in follicular and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The field of minimal residual disease testing in mantle cell lymphoma is still evolving but has great impact in determining the prognosis. Flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction-based testing are most commonly used methods in practice; however, these methods are not sensitive enough to detect the dynamic changes that underline lymphoma progression. Newer methods using next-generation sequencing, such as ClonoSeq, are being incorporated in clinical trials. Other techniques under evolution include CAPP-seq and anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based methods. This review article aims to provide a comprehensive update on the status of minimal residual disease detection and its prognostic effect in mantle cell patients. The role of circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease detection in lymphomas is also discussed.

14-Color single tube for flow cytometric characterization of CD5+ B-LPDs and high sensitivity automated minimal residual disease quantitation of CLL/SLL

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of CLL/SLL relies on flow cytometric immunophenotyping. Increasing emphasis is being placed on precise detection of the minimal residual disease. Following antigen recommendations of ERIC and ESCCA's Harmonization Project, we validated a 14-color assay for the characterization CD5+ lymphoproliferative neoplasms and CLL MRD with a sensitivity of at least 10^-4 .

METHODS

The assay was designed based on ERIC/ESCCA recommended antigens with the addition of CD40 for alternate gating when CD19 expression is reduced. Lower limit of quantitation/lower limit of detection, assay procedural precision, linearity, and limit of blank were established. Then, 52 CD5+ B-cell lymphoproliferative neoplasms (41 CLL/11 non-CLL) and 29 normal samples were used for parallel evaluation. Automated cluster identification and quantitation of CLL clones in MRD setting was performed using Barned-Hutt SNE. Separation analysis between CLL and non-CLL phenotypes was performed by PCA and bh-SNE.

RESULTS

Separation ratios for each antigen exceeded ERIC/ESCCA guidelines. Precision was <20% at LLOQ (0.01%). The limit of blank was <10/500,000 cells. Concordance between the 14-color and legacy assay (Deming regression y = 1.01x, r²  = .99) was seen. All 20 samples with MRD levels 0.5%-0.006% (median 0.04%) showed an abnormal cell cluster by bh-SNE, with concordant results between manual and automated quantitation (y = x, r²  = 1). CLL cases clustered together and away from mantle cell lymphoma by bh-SNE and PCA with outlier atypical phenotype CLL cases posing diagnostic challenges by both manual and automated analysis.

CONCLUSION

The 14-color CD5+ LPD assay provides a robust standardization platform for MRD and disease characterization using both manual and automated analysis.

TP53 dysfunction in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: clinical relevance in the era of B-cell receptors and BCL-2 inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Patients with TP53 dysfunction, assessed by del(17p) or TP53 mutations, respond poorly to chemo-immunotherapy and fare better with the new therapies (BCR and BCL-2 inhibitors); however, it is unclear whether their response is similar to that of patients without anomalies or whether there is currently an adequate determination of TP53 dysfunction.

AREA COVERED

A literature search was undertaken on clinical trials and real-world experience data on patients with TP53 dysfunction treated with different protocols. Moreover, data on the TP53 biological function and on the tests currently employed for its assessment were reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Although TP53 dysfunction has less negative influence on the new biological therapies, patients with these alterations, particularly those with biallelic inactivation of TP53, have a worst outcome with these therapies than those without alterations. At present, a determination of TP53, particularly with next generation sequencing (NGS) methodologies, may be sufficient for the identifications of the patients unsuitable for chemo-immunotherapy, although integration with del(17p) would be advisable. For the future, more extensive determinations of the TP53 status, including functional assays, may become part of the current armamentarium for a better patient stratification and treatment with newer protocols.