More about complement in the antiphospholipid syndrome

Complement biomarkers in the antiphospholipid syndrome - Approaches to quantification and implications for clinical management

Complement is a major driver of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and a promising therapeutic target in refractory and catastrophic APS. Complement testing in APS is largely limited to research settings, and reliable, rapid-turnaround biomarkers are needed to predict those at risk for adverse clinical outcomes and most likely to benefit from complement inhibition. We review complement biomarkers and their association with thrombosis and obstetric outcomes, including: (i) complement proteins and activation fragments in the fluid phase; (ii) assays that evaluate complement on cell membranes (e.g. in vivo cell-bound complement fragments, hemolytic assays, and ex vivo 'functional' cell-based assays, and (iii) sequencing of complement genes. Current studies highlight the inconsistencies in testing both between studies and various aPL/APS subgroups, suggesting that either cell-based testing or multiplex panels employing a combination of biomarkers simultaneously may be most clinically relevant. Standardization of complement assays is needed to ensure reproducibility and establish clinically relevant applications.

Ex Vivo Test for Measuring Complement Attack on Endothelial Cells: From Research to Bedside

As part of the innate immune system, the complement system plays a key role in defense against pathogens and in host cell homeostasis. This enzymatic cascade is rapidly triggered in the presence of activating surfaces. Physiologically, it is tightly regulated on host cells to avoid uncontrolled activation and self-damage. In cases of abnormal complement dysregulation/overactivation, the endothelium is one of the primary targets. Complement has gained momentum as a research interest in the last decade because its dysregulation has been implicated in the pathophysiology of many human diseases. Thus, it appears to be a promising candidate for therapeutic intervention. However, detecting abnormal complement activation is challenging. In many pathological conditions, complement activation occurs locally in tissues. Standard routine exploration of the plasma concentration of the complement components shows values in the normal range. The available tests to demonstrate such dysregulation with diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications are limited. There is a real need to develop tools to demonstrate the implications of complement in diseases and to explore the complex interplay between complement activation and regulation on human cells. The analysis of complement deposits on cultured endothelial cells incubated with pathologic human serum holds promise as a reference assay. This ex vivo assay most closely resembles the physiological context. It has been used to explore complement activation from sera of patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, malignant hypertension, elevated liver enzymes low platelet syndrome, sickle cell disease, pre-eclampsia, and others. In some cases, it is used to adjust the therapeutic regimen with a complement-blocking drug. Nevertheless, an international standard is lacking, and the mechanism by which complement is activated in this assay is not fully understood. Moreover, primary cell culture remains difficult to perform, which probably explains why no standardized or commercialized assay has been proposed. Here, we review the diseases for which endothelial assays have been applied. We also compare this test with others currently available to explore complement overactivation. Finally, we discuss the unanswered questions and challenges to overcome for validating the assays as a tool in routine clinical practice.

The Syndromes of Thrombotic Microangiopathy: A Critical Appraisal on Complement Dysregulation

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a rare and potentially life-threatening condition that can be caused by a heterogeneous group of diseases, often affecting the brain and kidneys. TMAs should be classified according to etiology to indicate targets for treatment. Complement dysregulation is an important cause of TMA that defines cases not related to coexisting conditions, that is, primary atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Ever since the approval of therapeutic complement inhibition, the approach of TMA has focused on the recognition of primary atypical HUS. Recent advances, however, demonstrated the pivotal role of complement dysregulation in specific subtypes of patients considered to have secondary atypical HUS. This is particularly the case in patients presenting with coexisting hypertensive emergency, pregnancy, and kidney transplantation, shifting the paradigm of disease. In contrast, complement dysregulation is uncommon in patients with other coexisting conditions, such as bacterial infection, drug use, cancer, and autoimmunity, among other disorders. In this review, we performed a critical appraisal on complement dysregulation and the use of therapeutic complement inhibition in TMAs associated with coexisting conditions and outline a pragmatic approach to diagnosis and treatment. For future studies, we advocate the term complement-mediated TMA as opposed to the traditional atypical HUS-type classification.

Functional and Genetic Landscape of Complement Dysregulation Along the Spectrum of Thrombotic Microangiopathy and its Potential Implications on Clinical Outcomes

Introduction

The syndromes of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) are diverse and represent severe endothelial damage caused by various mechanisms. The complement system plays a major role in a subset of patients with TMA, and its recognition is of clinical importance because it guides choice and duration of treatment.

Methods

We studied a well-defined cohort of patients with TMA and hypothesized that assessment of serum-induced ex vivo C5b9 formation on the endothelium and screening for rare variants in complement genes can better categorize TMA.

Results

Massive ex vivo C5b9 formation was found in all patients with primary atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (n/N = 11/11) and in 59% of patients with TMA and coexisting conditions (n/N = 30/51). Massive ex vivo C5b9 formation was associated with rare genetic variants (45% [n/N = 20/44] vs. 0% [n/N = 0/21] patients with normal ex vivo C5b9 formation; P < 0.001). Massive ex vivo C5b9 formation was associated with favorable renal response to therapeutic complement inhibition in patients with TMA and coexisting conditions (86% [n/N = 12/14] vs. 31% [n/N = 5/16] of untreated patients; P < 0.001), indicating complement-mediated TMA rather than secondary disease. Among treated patients, the odds ratio for 1-year kidney survival was 12.0 (95% confidence interval 1.2-115.4). TMA recurrence was linked to rare genetic variants in all cases. Patients with normal ex vivo C5b9 formation had an acute, nonrelapsing form of TMA.

Conclusions

Ex vivo C5b9 formation and genetic testing appears to categorize TMAs into different groups because it identifies complement as a driving factor of disease, with potential therapeutic and prognostic implications.