Phase 1/dose expansion trial of brentuximab vedotin and lenalidomide in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Update of antibody-drug conjugates for hematological malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), consisting of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) covalently linked to cytotoxic drugs via chemical linkers, are a kind of promising tumor immunotherapy. ADCs also face a number of challenges, including unavoidable adverse effects, drug resistance, tumor targeting and payload release. To address these issues, in addition to optimizing the individual components of ADCs, such as new payloads, linkage sites and new targets, and using bispecific antibodies to increase precision, attention should be paid to optimizing the dosage of ADCs.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are currently 7 ADCs approved for marketing by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for hematological malignancies, and dozens of other ADCs are either in clinical trials or in the process of applying for marketing. In recent clinical studies targeting ADCs in hematologic malignancies, in addition to validating effectiveness in different indications, researchers have attempted to combine ADCs with other chemotherapeutic agents in anticipation of increased therapeutic efficacy. Furthermore, the availability of bispecific antibodies may increase the safety and efficacy of ADCs.

SUMMARY

This review summarized the progress of research on ADCs in hematological malignancies, the challenges being faced, and possible future directions to improve the efficacy of ADCs, which can provide novel insight into the future exploration of ADCs in the treatment of hematological malignancies.

Novel Targets and Advanced Therapies in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphomas

Since the introduction of rituximab in the late 1990s, significant progress has been made in advancing targeted therapies for B cell lymphomas, improving patients' chance of being cured and clinicians' therapeutic armamentarium. A better understanding of disease biology and pathogenic pathways, coupled with refinements in immunophenotypic and molecular diagnostics, have been instrumental in these achievements. While traditional chemotherapy remains fundamental in most cases, concerns surrounding chemorefractoriness and cumulative toxicities, particularly the depletion of the hemopoietic reserve, underscore the imperative for personalized treatment approaches. Integrating targeted agents, notably monoclonal antibodies, alongside chemotherapy has yielded heightened response rates and prolonged survival. A notable paradigm shift is underway with innovative-targeted therapies replacing cytotoxic drugs, challenging conventional salvage strategies like stem cell transplantation. This review examines the landscape of emerging targets for lymphoma cells and explores innovative therapies for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). From Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T cells to more potent monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, checkpoint inhibitors, and small molecules targeting intracellular pathways, each modality offers promising avenues for therapeutic advancement. This review aims to furnish insights into their potential implications for the future of DLBCL treatment strategies.

Expression and Clinical Significance of CD30 and CD56 in Lymphoblastic Lymphoma: A Retrospective Analysis on Paraffin-Embedded Tissues by Immunohistochemistry

Background: We evaluated CD30 and CD56 expression in lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) and correlated the results with clinicopathological features and prognosis. Methods: Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed on 85 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded LBL specimens using two CD30 clones and one CD56 antibody clone. Results: Weak and diffuse expression of CD30 was expressed in 4.7% (clone Ber-H2) or 14.1% (clone EPR4102) in LBL, while CD56 was expressed in 24.7%. CD30 and CD56 expression correlated with lactate dehydrogenase levels. CD56-positive expression was closely associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Although CD30 expression exhibited a trend toward poorer overall survival, it did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: CD56 is a potential negative prognostic marker. These findings suggest that CD30 and CD56 targeted therapies could be potential therapeutic targets for LBL patients.

New Frontiers in Monoclonal Antibodies for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive lymphoma. Approximately 60% of patients are cured with R-CHOP as a frontline treatment, while the remaining patients experience primary refractory or relapsed disease (R/R). The prognosis for R/R DLBCL patients who are neither eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantations nor CAR-T-cell treatment is poor, representing an important unmet need. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have dramatically improved therapeutic options in anti-cancer strategies, offering new opportunities to overcome chemo-refractoriness in this challenging disease, even in cases of primary non-responder DLBCL. Several novel mAbs, characterized by different mechanisms of action and targets, are now available for R/R DLBCL. Unbound mAbs induce an immune response against cancer cells, triggering different mechanisms, including antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), activation of antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis (ADCP) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and radioimmunotherapy (RIT), respectively, deliver a cytotoxic payload or a beta-emitter radionuclide to the targeted cells and nearby bystanders. Bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTes) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) redirect and enhance the immune response against tumor cells. Here, we review therapeutic strategies based on monoclonal antibodies for R/R DLBCL.

Mechanism of action and therapeutic targeting of CD30 molecule in lymphomas

At present, the treatment of lymphoma has entered the era of precision medicine, and CD30, as a transmembrane protein, has become an important marker to help the diagnosis and formulation of treatment plans for lymphomas. This protein is widely expressed in various types of lymphomas and can play a role through nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and other pathways, and ultimately lead to the up-regulation of CD30 expression to give tumor cells a survival advantage. Brentuximab vedotin (BV), as an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting CD30, is one of the first new drugs to significantly improve survival in patients with CD30+lymphomas. However, the biological function of CD30 has not been fully elucidated. Therefore, this review highlights the CD30-mediated tumor-promoting mechanisms and the molecular factors that regulate CD30 expression. We hope that a better understanding of CD30 biology will provide new insights into clinical treatment and improve the survival and quality of life of lymphoma patients.

A phase II study of lenalidomide and rituximab (R2) combination in patients with high-risk refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma have a dismal prognosis in need of innovative treatments. This prospective phase 2 study enrolled 32 patients between 2013 and 2017 with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma treated with Rituximab and Lenalidomide (R2). Median age was 69 years (40-86), 90.1% had received at least 2 prior lines of treatment, 81% were defined as having High Risk disease according to our criteria and ECOG performance status was > 2 in 51.6%. Patients received a median number of 2 cycles of R2 (1-12). With a median follow up of 22.6 months, the objective response rate was 12.5%. Median progression free survival was 2.6 months (95% CI, [1.7-2.9]) and median overall survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, [5.1-Not estimable]). This study therefore did not achieve its primary endpoint and the R2 regimen cannot be recommended in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma patients with High Risk features.

Second-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Evolution of options

In the era of immunochemotherapy, approximately 60%-70% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients achieve remission with first-line rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy. However, 30%-40% relapse after initial response to first-line therapy and, out of them, 20%-50% are refractory or experience early relapse. The second-line therapy algorithm for DLBCL has recently evolved, thanks to the recent approval of new therapeutic agents or their combinations. The new guidelines suggest a stratification of relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL based on the time to relapse. For transplant-eligible patients, autologous stem cell transplant remains the preferred option when the patient relapses after 12 months from diagnosis, while anti-CD19 CART-cell therapy is the current preferred choice for high-risk DLBCL, defined as primary refractory or relapse ≤12 months. For transplant-ineligible or CAR T-cell therapy-ineligible patients, the therapeutic arsenal historically lacked effective options. However, new therapeutic options, including polatuzumab vedotin combined with bendamustine-rituximab and tafasitamab with lenalidomide, have been recently approved, and novel agents such as loncastuximab tesirine, selinexor, anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, and bispecific antibodies have shown promising efficacy and manageable safety in this setting offering new hope to patients in this challenging scenario.

Antibody and immunotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoma and a heterogeneous B-cell disease. The majority of patients with newly diagnosed disease are cured with first-line combination immunochemotherapy treatment however, those who experience treatment failure have dismal outcomes. Antibody therapies and immunotherapy have provided the single most major advance in the treatment of DLBCL in the last 4 decades. Rituximab, the first immunotherapy, and a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20, improved DLBCL overall survival when added to chemotherapy 2 decades ago. Since then, the advent of further "naked" monoclonal antibodies that target malignant B-cells or stimulate the immune system to kill cancer, as well as antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies have all entered the DLBCL armamentarium; with 5 antibody therapy approvals in the last 6 years alone. Here we review the literature on antibodies and immunotherapies for DLBCL and the future directions involving this successful group of drugs.

The progress of novel strategies on immune-based therapy in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be cured with standard front-line immunochemotherapy, whereas nearly 30-40% of patients experience refractory or relapse. For several decades, the standard treatment strategy for fit relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL patients has been high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-SCT). However, the patients who failed in salvage treatment or those ineligible for subsequent auto-SCT have dismal outcomes. Several immune-based therapies have been developed, including monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and novel small molecules. Meanwhile, allogeneic SCT and radiotherapy are still necessary for disease control for fit patients with certain conditions. In this review, to expand clinical treatment options, we summarize the recent progress of immune-related therapies and prospect the future indirections in patients with R/R DLBCL.

Novel agents in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), ineligible for or relapsing after autologous stem-cell transplant or chimeric antigen-receptor T-cell therapies have poor outcomes. Several novel agents, polatuzumab vedotin, tafasitamab, loncastuximab tesirine, and selinexor, have been approved and offer new opportunities for this difficult to treat population. Studies are evaluating combination of these agents with chemotherapy and other emerging therapies. Additionally, advances in our understanding of DLBCL biology, genetics, and immune microenvironment have allowed for the identification of new therapeutic targets like Ikaros and Aiolos, IRAK4, MALT1, and CD47 with several agents in ongoing clinical trials. In this chapter we review updated data supporting the use of the approved agents and discuss other emerging novel therapies for patients with R/R DLBCL.

Simplified algorithm for genetic subtyping in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Genetic classification helps to disclose molecular heterogeneity and therapeutic implications in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Using whole exome/genome sequencing, RNA-sequencing, and fluorescence in situ hybridization in 337 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients, we established a simplified 38-gene algorithm (termed 'LymphPlex') based on the information on mutations of 35 genes and rearrangements of three genes (BCL2, BCL6, and MYC), identifying seven distinct genetic subtypes: TP53^Mut (TP53 mutations), MCD-like (MYD88, CD79B, PIM1, MPEG1, BTG1, TBL1XR1, PRDM1, IRF4 mutations), BN2-like (BCL6 fusion, NOTCH2, CD70, DTX1, BTG2, TNFAIP3, CCND3 mutations), N1-like (NOTCH1 mutations), EZB-like (BCL2 fusion, EZH2, TNFRSF14, KMT2D, B2M, FAS, CREBBP, ARID1A, EP300, CIITA, STAT6, GNA13 mutations, with or without MYC rearrangement), and ST2-like (SGK1, TET2, SOCS1, DDX3X, ZFP36L1, DUSP2, STAT3, IRF8 mutations). Extended validation of 1001 DLBCL patients revealed clinical relevance and biological signature of each genetic subtype. TP53^Mut subtype showed poor prognosis, characterized by p53 signaling dysregulation, immune deficiency, and PI3K activation. MCD-like subtype was associated with poor prognosis, activated B-cell (ABC) origin, BCL2/MYC double-expression, and NF-κB activation. BN2-like subtype showed favorable outcome within ABC-DLBCL and featured with NF-κB activation. N1-like and EZB-like subtypes were predominated by ABC-DLBCL and germinal center B-cell (GCB)-DLBCL, respectively. EZB-like-MYC⁺ subtype was characterized by an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, while EZB-like-MYC^- subtype by NOTCH activation. ST2-like subtype showed favorable outcome within GCB-DLBCL and featured with stromal-1 modulation. Genetic subtype-guided targeted agents achieved encouraging clinical response when combined with immunochemotherapy. Collectively, LymphPlex provided high efficacy and feasibility, representing a step forward to the mechanism-based targeted therapy in DLBCL.

Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Moving beyond Rituximab

Although rituximab has revolutionized the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), a significant proportion of patients experience refractory disease or relapse early after the end of treatment. The lack of effective treatment options in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting had made the prognosis of these patients dismal. The initial enthusiasm for novel anti-CD20 antibodies had been short-lived as they failed to prove their superiority to rituximab. Therefore, research has focused on developing novel agents with a unique mechanism of action. Among them, two antibody-drug conjugates, namely polatuzumab vedotin (PolaV) and loncastuximab tesirine, along with tafasitamab, an anti-CD19 bioengineered antibody, have been approved for the treatment of R/R DLBCL. Whereas PolaV has been FDA and EMA approved, EMA has not approved loncastuximab tesirine and tafasitamab yet. Results from randomized trials, as well as real-life data for PolaV have been promising. Novel agents as bispecific antibodies bridging CD3 on T-cells to CD20 have shown very promising results in clinical trials and are expected to gain approval for treatment of R/R DLBCL soon. As the therapeutic armamentarium against DLBCL is expanding, an improvement in survival of patients with R/R and higher cure rates might soon become evident.