How I treat thrombotic microangiopathy in the era of rapid genomics

Medical consult: aHUS, TTP? How to distinguish and what to do

Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) caused by an autoantibody-mediated deficiency of ADAMTS13 and atypical hemolytic syndrome (aHUS) caused by alternative complement dysregulation are the most common primary thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs). The evaluation of a patient with TMA is a medical emergency since it is critical to quickly distinguish iTTP and aHUS from other causes of TMA. Untreated iTTP is rapidly fatal, and delays in initiating complement inhibition in aHUS increase the risk of irreversible renal failure. An ADAMTS13 activity level of less than 10% is diagnostic of iTTP in the appropriate clinical setting. In settings where rapid-turnaround ADAMTS13 testing is not available, clinical features and clinical prediction tools are useful to identify patients who should receive emergent plasma exchange. We present an evidence-based approach to the initial (first 24 hours) diagnosis and management of iTTP and review the clinical and laboratory features that can be used to identify patients with aHUS who will benefit from early C5 blockade. We also discuss the potential use of complement blockade to improve outcomes in selected patients with secondary TMA.

Complement biomarkers in the antiphospholipid syndrome - Approaches to quantification and implications for clinical management

Complement is a major driver of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and a promising therapeutic target in refractory and catastrophic APS. Complement testing in APS is largely limited to research settings, and reliable, rapid-turnaround biomarkers are needed to predict those at risk for adverse clinical outcomes and most likely to benefit from complement inhibition. We review complement biomarkers and their association with thrombosis and obstetric outcomes, including: (i) complement proteins and activation fragments in the fluid phase; (ii) assays that evaluate complement on cell membranes (e.g. in vivo cell-bound complement fragments, hemolytic assays, and ex vivo 'functional' cell-based assays, and (iii) sequencing of complement genes. Current studies highlight the inconsistencies in testing both between studies and various aPL/APS subgroups, suggesting that either cell-based testing or multiplex panels employing a combination of biomarkers simultaneously may be most clinically relevant. Standardization of complement assays is needed to ensure reproducibility and establish clinically relevant applications.