The role of allogeneic transplant for adult Ph+ ALL in CR1 with complete molecular remission: a retrospective analysis

Ponatinib-review of historical development, current status, and future research

Ponatinib is a third-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with high potency against Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive leukemias, including T315I-mutated disease, which is resistant to first- and second-generation TKIs. Ponatinib was approved for T315I-mutated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), CML resistant/intolerant to ≥2 prior TKIs, advanced phase CML and Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) where no other TKIs are indicated, and T315I-mutated CML and Ph-positive ALL. The response-based dosing of ponatinib in chronic phase CML (CP-CML) improved treatment tolerance and reduced the risk of toxicities, including cardiovascular risks. Ponatinib-based therapy also resulted in significantly better outcomes in frontline Ph-positive ALL compared with prior TKIs and is becoming a new standard of care in this setting. As the clinical development of third-generation TKIs and their rational combinations progresses, we envision further transformative changes in the treatment of CML and Ph-positive ALL.

Is intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation mandatory for curing Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in young patients in the era of multitarget agents?

INTRODUCTION

The treatment outcomes for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) have improved with various tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and bispecific T-cell engagers. Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the standard treatment for young patients with Ph+ALL, its role remains debatable in the era of TKIs and blinatumomab.

AREAS COVERED

There are some issues regarding Ph+ALL. First, do young patients require intensive chemotherapy (IC) in the era of multitarget agents? Second, which TKI is preferred for frontline therapy? Third, should allo-SCT be performed in patients achieving complete remission with ponatinib and IC? Fourth, can chemo-free treatment lead to a cure without allo-SCT? We searched relevant literature from the last 30 years on PubMed; reviewed the role of chemo-free therapies and combinations of ponatinib and IC; and assessed the necessity of allo-SCT in young patients with Ph+ALL.

EXPERT OPINION

Allo-SCT may not be needed, even in young patients with Ph+ALL treated with ponatinib-based IC or combined ponatinib and blinatumomab as frontline therapy. When adopting a ponatinib-based chemo-minimized regimen for induction, allo-SCT is needed with posttransplant ponatinib maintenance. Continuous exposure to ponatinib at pre- or post-transplant is regarded as one of the most important factor for the success of treatment.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions, Measurable Residual Disease in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) provides important prognostic information and can inform decision-making about appropriate consolidative therapy in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Many contemporary treatment protocols for Ph+ ALL achieve high rates of MRD negativity, and several analyses suggest that allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in first remission can be safely deferred in most patients who achieve MRD negativity by PCR for BCR::ABL1 within 3 months. Given the close association between achievement of MRD negativity and favorable long-term outcomes in Ph+ ALL, MRD response rates may aid in the evaluation of novel regimens, particularly in the absence of randomized data or robust survival data. While most studies in Ph+ ALL have used PCR for BCR::ABL1 to measure MRD and correlate with outcomes, this assay has several limitations. PCR or next-generation sequencing-based assays for immunoglobin or T-cell receptor (IG/TR) gene rearrangements may provide a more accurate assessment of clinically significant MRD in Ph+ ALL, particularly in patients with multilineage involvement of BCR::ABL1. Herein, we discuss the prognostic and therapeutic role of MRD in Ph+ ALL. We review the available methods of MRD assessment in Ph+ ALL and discuss the advantages of MRD assays that track IG/TR rearrangements rather than BCR::ABL1.

MRD in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive ALL: Methodologies and Clinical Implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is integral in the management of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This review discusses the current methods used to evaluate MRD as well as the interpretation, significance, and incorporation of MRD in current practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

New molecular technologies have allowed the detection of MRD to levels as low as 10- 6. The most used techniques to evaluate MRD are multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC), quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS). Each method varies in terms of advantages, disadvantages, and MRD sensitivity. MRD negativity after induction treatment and after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an important prognostic marker that has consistently been shown to be associated with improved outcomes. Blinatumomab, a new targeted therapy for Ph + ALL, demonstrates high efficacy in eradicating MRD and improving patient outcomes. In the relapsed/refractory setting, the use of inotuzumab ozogamicin and tisagenlecleucel has shown promise in eradicating MRD. The presence of MRD has become an important predictive measure in Ph + ALL. Current studies evaluate the use of MRD in treatment decisions, especially in expanding therapeutic options for Ph + ALL, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, targeted antibody therapies, chimeric antigen receptor cell therapy, and HCT.

Advances in the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the role of frontline immunotherapy-based regimens

Blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) are both active in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and improve outcomes compared with conventional chemotherapy in this setting. Several prospective clinical trials have explored the use of these agents in adults with newly diagnosed B-cell ALL, with promising outcomes observed in younger and older adults and in both Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive and Ph-negative ALL. These novel regimens result in high rates of deep measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity and may improve survival compared with chemotherapy-only approaches, allowing for less reliance on intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This review discusses novel approaches to integrating INO and/or blinatumomab into frontline ALL regimens, including the potential role of chemotherapy-free regimens in some subgroups. The role of MRD monitoring is also discussed, including how this can inform decisions for consolidative allogeneic HSCT or investigational approaches with CD19 CAR T-cells.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Next Questions: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

The integration of immune and targeted therapies into the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has significantly improved outcomes, reduced the intensity and duration of chemotherapy, and the reliance on allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). In younger patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative ALL, treatment with Hyper-CVAD and blinatumomab +/- inotuzumab has improved the 3-year overall survival (OS) to above 85%. In older patients, using less intensive chemotherapy (mini-Hyper-CVD) in combination with inotuzumab and blinatumomab has improved the 5-year OS rate to 50%. In Ph+ ALL, the chemotherapy-free combinations of blinatumomab and ponatinib (or dasatinib) have become a new standard of care resulting in 3-year OS of 85% to 90%. Because the methotrexate-cytarabine courses were omitted in the nonchemotherapy regimens, central nervous system (CNS) relapses were noted, particularly in patients with a WBC count > 70 × 109/L, requiring to consider increasing the number of prophylactic intrathecals (from 12 to 15) and perhaps developing a CNS risk-directed high-dose systemic chemotherapy. In relapsed/refractory ALL, a dose-dense regimen integrating blinatumomab and inotuzumab with low-intensity chemotherapy followed by consolidation with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is being investigated. The detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) following ALL therapy is predictive of disease relapse. Using next-generation sequencing allows the detection of MRD at 1 × 10-6 which was shown to be superior to multiparameter flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction in predicting relapse, and could be used to decide on the duration of therapy or need to change therapy. Herein, we review the recent updates and areas of unmet need in ALL.

Age barriers in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: Raising the silver curtain

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is no longer exclusively for the young. With an aging population, development of non-intensive remission-inducing strategies for hematologic malignancies, and novel graft-versus-host disease-prevention platforms, an older population of patients is pursuing HCT. The evolving population of HCT recipients requires an overhaul in the way we risk-stratify and optimize patients prior to HCT. Here, we review the history and current state of HCT for older adults and propose an assessment and intervention flow to bridge the gaps in today's clinical guidelines.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Update on the Approach to Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

The outcome of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has improved significantly following the introduction of the BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The addition of newer-generation and more potent TKIs resulted in higher rates of molecular responses and better survival. Achieving a complete molecular remission (CMR; disappearance of the BCR::ABL1 transcripts) within the first 3 months of therapy is an important endpoint in newly diagnosed Ph-positive ALL that identifies patients who have an excellent long-term survival and who may not need to receive an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in first complete remission (CR). Chemotherapy-free combinations with blinatumomab plus TKIs showed encouraging results with estimated 2 to 4 year overall survival (OS) rates of 80% to 90%. Treatment with blinatumomab and ponatinib resulted in a CMR rate of 84%, a 2-year event-free survival (EFS) of 78%, and a 2-year OS rate of 90%; only 1 patient underwent HSCT. The detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) is the most important factor predicting for disease relapse. Studies have shown that the next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay is more sensitive than RT-PCR for the detection of MRD in Ph-positive ALL. Approximately 15% to 30% of patients who achieve NGS MRD negativity at a sensitivity of 1 × 10-6 may still have detectable BCR::ABL1 transcripts by RT-PCR. Achieving NGS MRD negativity can also identify patients who may have durable remissions with a low risk of relapse. Herein, we discuss the current approach to the management of adults with Ph-positive ALL, the role of HSCT, MRD monitoring, and future therapies.

Utility of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for adult Ph+ALL with complete molecular remission

This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) in the first complete remission (CR1) with complete molecular remission (CMR). We compared the outcomes between Ph+ALL patients who did or did not undergo allo-SCT in CR1. We included patients enrolled in the prospective clinical studies in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era conducted by the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group, who achieved CMR within 3 months. A total of 147 patients (allo-SCT: 101; non-SCT: 46) were eligible for this analysis. In the multivariate analyses, allo-SCT was significantly associated with both superior overall survival (OS) (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.54; 95% CI: 0.30-0.97; p = .04) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (aHR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.12-0.38; p < .001). The 5-year adjusted OS and RFS were 73% and 70% in the allo-SCT cohort, whereas they were 50% and 20% in the non-SCT cohort. Despite the higher non-relapse mortality (aHR: 3.49; 95% CI: 1.17-10.4; p = .03), allo-SCT was significantly associated with a lower relapse rate (aHR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.05-0.20; p < .001). In addition, allo-SCT was also associated with superior graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (aHR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.25-0.74; p = .002). Propensity score-matched analyses confirmed the results of the multivariate analyses. In patients who achieved CMR within 3 months, allo-SCT in CR1 had superior survival and lower relapse compared with the non-SCT cohort.

Clinical efficacy and safety of flumatinib versus dasatinib combined with multi-drug chemotherapy in adults with Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Flumatinib, a highly selective ABL kinase inhibitor, exhibits stronger inhibition of intracellular BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase activity, compared to Imatinib. However, there is limited research comparing the real-world efficacy and safety of flumatinib and dasatinib in patients with Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL).

OBJECTIVE

Investigating the differences in therapeutic efficacy and safety between flumatinib and dasatinib in combination with multi-drug chemotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL.

METHOD

In this study, we assessed 43 patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL (20 in the flumatinib group, 23 in the dasatinib group).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in gender, age, fusion gene type, initial blood routine, bone marrow blast cell ratio or chromosome karyotype between the two groups. Within 1 month, there were no significant differences in the complete response (CR), major molecular response (MMR) or minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate between the flumatinib and dasatinib groups. Similarly, within 3 months, there were no significant differences in CR or MMR rates between the two groups. However, the rates of complete molecular response (CMR) and MRD negativity within 3 months were significantly higher in the flumatinib group, compared to the dasatinib group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the flumatinib group exhibited fewer adverse reactions compared to the dasatinib group.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that flumatinib is a safe and effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for achieving CMR and MRD negativity in patients with Ph+ ALL, as supported by this small series of patients.

Thiotepa-Based Regimens Are Valid Alternatives to Total Body Irradiation-Based Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimens in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Retrospective Study on Behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Total body irradiation (TBI) at myeloablative doses is superior to chemotherapy-based regimens in young patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, in elderly and unfit patients, in whom reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens are preferred, whether a TBI-based or a chemotherapy-based approach is better is unexplored. Thiotepa can be used as part of ALL conditioning regimens. The current study aimed to compare transplantation outcomes after RIC with TBI-based or thiotepa-based regimens in patients with ALL. The study cohort comprised patients aged ≥40 years undergoing allo-HSCT for ALL in first complete remission between 2000 and 2020 who received an RIC regimen containing either TBI (4 to 6 Gy) or thiotepa. We identified a total of 265 patients, including 117 who received a TBI-based RIC regimen and 148 who received a thiotepa-based RIC regimen. Univariate analysis revealed no significant differences in the following transplantation outcomes for TBI versus thiotepa: relapse, 23% versus 28% (P = .24); nonrelapse mortality, 20% versus 26% (P = .61); leukemia-free survival, 57% versus 46% (P = .12); overall survival, 67% versus 56% (P = .18); graft-versus-host disease (GVHD]/relapse-free survival, 45% versus 38% (P = .21); grade II-IV acute GVHD, 30% in both groups (P = .84); grade III-IV acute GVHD, 9% versus 10% (P = .89). The sole exception was the incidence of chronic GVHD, which was higher in the recipients of TBI-based regimens (43% versus 29%; P = .03). However, multivariate analysis revealed no differences in transplantation outcomes between the 2 groups. In patients aged ≥40 years receiving RIC, use of a thiotepa-based regimen may represent a valid alternative to TBI-based regimens, as no differences were observed in the main transplantation outcomes.

How to Manage Philadelphia-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Resource-Constrained Settings

Recent studies have indicated that more than half of adult patients newly diagnosed with Ph+ ALL can now achieve a cure. However, determining the most suitable protocol for less-resourced settings can be challenging. In these situations, we must consider the potential for treatment toxicity and limited access to newer agents and alloSCT facilities. Currently, it is advisable to use less intensive induction regimens for Ph+ ALL. These regimens can achieve high rates of complete remission while causing fewer induction deaths. For consolidation therapy, chemotherapy should remain relatively intensive, with careful monitoring of the BCR-ABL1 molecular transcript and minimal residual disease. AlloSCT may be considered, especially for patients who do not achieve complete molecular remission or have high-risk genetic abnormalities, such as IKZF1-plus. If there is a loss of molecular response, it is essential to screen patients for ABL mutations and, ideally, change the TKI therapy. The T315I mutation is the most common mechanism for disease resistance, being targetable to ponatinib. Blinatumomab, a bispecific antibody, has shown significant synergy with TKIs in treating this disease. It serves as an excellent salvage therapy, aside from achieving outstanding results when incorporated into the frontline.

Ponatinib Improved the Prognosis of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Japanese Single-Center Cohort Study

Introduction The overall survival (OS) of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) has improved with the combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with intensive chemotherapy. In recent years, there has been increased interest in the possibility of long-term survival without allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or maintenance therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of treatment and the resultant outcomes in Ph+ALL patients using real-world data. Methods We performed a single-center retrospective analysis utilizing Akita University Hospital data (Akita, Japan) from November 2000 to June 2023 to evaluate the outcomes of TKI with intensive chemotherapy for Ph+ALL. Results Twenty-three patients with Ph+ALL were treated with intensive chemotherapy combined with TKI, including six imatinib, four dasatinib, and 13 ponatinib. The median patient age was 53 years (range; 28-67). Eighteen patients (78%) achieved complete molecular remission (CMR) within three months. HSCT was performed in 16 patients (70%), all of whom did not receive post-transplant TKI maintenance therapy. Six of the seven patients who did not undergo HSCT received maintenance therapy with ponatinib after intensive chemotherapy. The three-year OS was 81%. Ponatinib treatment resulted in a much higher OS rate than imatinib/dasatinib (100% vs. 60%; P=0.011). CMR within three months was identified as a prognostic factor for molecular relapse-free survival (hazard ratio (HR)=0.22; P=0.027). CD20 positivity was identified as a risk factor for hematological relapse (HR=5.2, P=0.032). Conclusion Even in a single-center cohort study, ponatinib, as a combination TKI with intensive chemotherapy or maintenance therapy, may improve the prognosis of Ph+ALL. Patients with CMR within three months might not necessarily need to receive HSCT, but a subsequent treatment-free status could have been achieved only by HSCT. Furthermore, CD20 positivity may be a useful biomarker for future treatment decisions in patients with Ph+ALL.

Construction of CD19 targeted dual- and enhanced dual-antibodies and their efficiency in the treatment of B cell malignancy

BACKGROUND

T cell-redirecting bispecific antibodies establish a connection between endogenous T cells and tumor cells, activating T cells function to eliminate tumor cells without ex vivo genetic alteration or manipulation. Here, we developed a novel dual-specific antibody (DuAb) and an enhanced DuAb (EDuAb) with different stimulation signal to activate T cells, and evaluated their impact on the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

METHODS

The expression plasmids of the DuAb and EDuAb containing CD80 molecule were constructed by cloning heavy chain and light chain variable fragments from anti-human CD19 (HI19a) and CD3 (HIT3a) monoclonal antibody hybridomas, respectively. The activation and the anti-tumor efficacy of human T cells mediated by DuAb and EDuAb were evaluated in vitro. B-cell ALL xenograft NSG mouse model was established to investigate the therapeutic effect in vivo.

RESULTS

EDuAb promoted the optimal expansion of primary human T cells with low expression of inhibitory markers in vitro than DuAb did. Both DuAb and EDuAb showed a similar capability in inducing healthy donor T cells to specifically eliminate B-ALL cell lines and primary blasts from patients. The similar ability was also observed in the patient-derived T cells. In vivo study showed that both DuAb and EDuAb significantly alleviated tumor burden and extended survival of B-ALL xenograft NSG mice. The median survival of PBS, DuAb and EDuAb treatment groups were 27, 38 and 45 days, respectively. The phenotype of T cells and cytokine release in peripheral blood (PB) of B-ALL xenograft NSG mice on day 24 were analyzed as well. The results showed that the proportion of CD8⁺ T cells and cytokine levels, including IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-α, were higher in the EDuAb group than that of DuAb. Moreover, both DuAb and EDuAb significantly decreased the residual leukemia cells in PB of B-ALL xenograft NSG mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Both DuAb and EDuAb showed great potential as novel treatments for B-ALL in clinical applications. However, compared to DuAb, EDuAb showed a significant advantage in promoting the proliferation and survival of T cells. Furthermore, EDuAb showed a better promising effect on eliminating tumor cells and extending survival in vivo, which provides new insights for the development of new multi-specific antibodies.

Ultrasensitive NGS MRD assessment in Ph+ ALL: Prognostic impact and correlation with RT-PCR for BCR::ABL1

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for BCR::ABL1 is the most common and widely accepted method of measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL); however, RT-PCR may not be an optimal measure of MRD in many cases of Ph+ ALL. We evaluated the clinical impact of a highly sensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS) MRD assay (sensitivity of 10^-6 ) and its correlation with RT-PCR for BCR::ABL1 in patients with Ph+ ALL. Overall, 32% of patients had a discordance between MRD assessment by RT-PCR and NGS, and 31% of patients who achieved NGS MRD negativity were PCR+ at the same timepoint. Among eight patients with long-term detectable BCR::ABL1 by PCR, six were PCR+/NGS-. These patients generally had stable PCR levels that persisted despite therapeutic interventions, and none subsequently relapsed; in contrast, patients who were PCR+/NGS+ had more variable PCR values that responded to therapeutic intervention. In a separate cohort of prospectively collected clinical samples, 11 of 65 patients (17%) with Ph+ ALL who achieved NGS MRD negativity had detectable BCR::ABL1 by PCR, and none of these patients relapsed. Relapse-free survival and overall survival were similar in patients who were PCR+/NGS- and PCR-/NGS-, suggesting that PCR for BCR::ABL1 did not provide additional prognostic information in patients who achieved NGS MRD negativity. NGS-based assessment of MRD is prognostic in Ph+ ALL and identifies patients with low-level detectable BCR::ABL1 who are unlikely to relapse nor to benefit from therapeutic interventions.

Management of Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the current era

Before the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) the outcome of Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) was dismal. The TKI combination with induction regimens has greatly improved the long-term outcome of Ph+ ALL, specifically ponatinib a most potent TKI in combination with HyperCVAD (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) chemotherapy has demonstrated 5 years overall survival up to 75%. Historically, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) used to be the only potential curative option, recent data suggest that patients who achieve complete molecular remission within 3 months of TKI based induction therapies can achieve comparable overall survival with or without allo-HSCT. Intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy may not be the desirable treatment option in elderly Ph+ ALL patients due to anticipated tolerance, recently in a phase II study, "chemotherapy free" combinations such as blinatumomab (bispecific anti-CD3 and anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody) with ponatinib in treatment naïve Ph+ ALL patients have shown a complete response rate of 95% and 2 years overall survival of 93%. In this review we have highlighted the evolving treatment landscape of Ph+ ALL and what to look for in future.

How I prevent and treat central nervous system disease in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The central nervous system (CNS) is the most important site of extramedullary disease in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Although CNS disease is identified only in a minority of patients at the time of diagnosis, subsequent CNS relapses (either isolated or concurrent with other sites) occur in some patients even after the delivery of prophylactic therapy targeted to the CNS. Historically, prophylaxis against CNS disease has included intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT), although the latter is being used with decreasing frequency. Treatment of a CNS relapse usually involves intensive systemic therapy and cranial or craniospinal RT along with IT therapy and consideration of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. However, short- and long-term toxicities can make these interventions prohibitively risky, particularly for older adults. As new antibody-based immunotherapy agents have been approved for relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL, their use specifically for patients with CNS disease is an area of keen interest not only because of the potential for efficacy but also concerns of unique toxicity to the CNS. In this review, we discuss data-driven approaches for these common and challenging clinical scenarios as well as highlight how recent findings potentially support the use of novel immunotherapeutic strategies for CNS disease.

Chemotherapy with the use of next-generation TKIs based on MRD has the potential to avoid hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in treatment for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) as postremission treatment is recommended for Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) in current guidelines. However, comparisons of later generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus chemotherapy with allo-HSCT have yielded similar outcomes. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate allo-HSCT in first complete remission (CR1) versus chemotherapy for adult Ph+ ALL in the TKI era.

METHODS

Pooled assessment of the hematologic and molecular complete response rates was performed after 3-month TKI treatment. Hazard ratios (HRs) were determined for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit with allo-HSCT. The effect of measurable residual disease status on survival benefit was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine retrospective and prospective single-arm cohort studies involving 5054 patients were included. Combined HRs indicated that in the general population, allo-HSCT favorably influenced DFS and OS. Achieving complete molecular remission (CMR) within 3 months after starting induction was a favorable survival prognostic factor regardless of whether the patient had undergone allo-HSCT. Among the patients with CMR, survival rates in the nontransplant subgroup were comparable with those in the transplant subgroup, with the estimated 5-year OS of 64% versus 58% and 5-year DFS of 58% versus 51%, respectively. The use of next-generation TKIs results in a higher proportion of patients achieving CMR (ponatinib 82% vs. imatinib 53%), while improving survival in nontransplant patients.

CONCLUSION

Our novel findings suggest that combination chemotherapy plus TKIs leads to a comparable survival benefit as with allo-HSCT for MRD-negative (CMR) patients. This study provides novel evidence for allo-HSCT indications for Ph+ ALL in CR1 in the TKI era.

Intensity of induction regimen and outcomes among adults with Ph+ALL undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are essential for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) and have allowed for effective, low intensity induction regimens including no or minimal chemotherapy. Whether the use of low intensity induction regimens impacts outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHCT) is less understood. We identified consecutive adult patients with Ph+ ALL undergoing alloHCT in first complete remission (CR1) at our center from 2010 to 2021 and examined the impact of pre-transplant induction intensity on outcomes. Among the 87 identified patients, 44 (51%) received low intensity induction and 43 (49%) received induction with high intensity chemotherapy. Patients receiving low intensity induction were older (median age 60 vs. 47 years, p < 0.01). Following induction, measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity by BCR::ABL1 RT-PCR was similar in the low and high intensity induction cohorts (54% and 52% respectively). Receipt of reduced intensity transplant conditioning was not associated with intensity of induction regimen (39% vs. 19% in low vs. high, respectively, p = 0.06). At a median follow-up of 21 months from transplant, there was no difference between low and high intensity induction with respect to 2-year disease-free survival (58% vs. 56%), 2-year overall survival (62% vs. 63%), 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (9% vs. 17%), and 2-year non-relapse mortality (33% vs. 29%). We also found no difference in outcomes when patients were segmented by both induction and conditioning regimen intensities. Our retrospective analysis suggests that induction intensity does not impact post-transplant outcomes among patients with Ph+ ALL transplanted in CR1.

CNS Involvement at Initial Diagnosis and Risk of Relapse After Allogeneic HCT for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Complete Remission

Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved over time. Studies have shown that total body irradiation (TBI) is the preferable type of myeloablative conditioning (MAC). However, outcomes based on central nervous system (CNS) involvement, namely CNS-positive versus CNS-negative, have not been compared. Here, we evaluated outcomes of 547 patients (CNS-positive = 96, CNS-negative = 451) who were allografted in the first complete remission (CR1) between 2009 and 2019. Primary endpoint was leukemia-free survival (LFS). Median follow-up was not different between the CNS-positive and CNS-negative groups (79 versus 67.2 months, P = 0.58). The CNS-positive group were younger (median age 31.3 versus 39.7 years, P = 0.004) and were allografted more recently (median year 2012 versus 2010, P = 0.003). In both groups, MAC was the preferred approach (82.3% versus 85.6%, P = 0.41). On multivariate analysis, the CNS-positive group had higher incidence of relapse (RI) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.58 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-2.35], P = 0.025), but no adverse effect on LFS (HR = 1.38 [95% CI = 0.99-1.92], P = 0.057) or overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.28 [95% CI = 0.89-1.85], P = 0.18). A subgroup multivariate analysis limited to CNS-positive patients showed that a TBI-based MAC regimen resulted in better LFS (HR = 0.43 [95% CI = 0.22-0.83], P = 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.44 [95% CI = 0.21-0.92], P = 0.03) and lower RI (HR = 0.35 [95% CI = 0.15-0.79], P = 0.01). Another subgroup analysis in CNS-negative patients showed that MAC-TBI preparative regimens also showed a lower RI without a benefit in LFS or OS. While a MAC-TBI allo-HCT regimen may not be suitable to all, particularly for older patients with comorbidities, this approach should be considered for patients who are deemed fit and able to tolerate.