Effect of Diagnosis (Refractory Anemia With Excess Blasts, Refractory Anemia With Excess Blasts in Transformation, or Acute Myeloid Leukemia [AML]) on Outcome of AML-Type Chemotherapy

Advances in the management of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: future prospects

Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) are defined using a number of prognostic scoring systems that include the degree of cytopenias, percentage of blasts, cytogenetic alterations, and more recently genomic data. HR-MDS encompasses characteristics such as progressive cytopenias, increased bone marrow blasts, unfavorable cytogenetics, and an adverse mutational profile. Survival is generally poor, and patients require therapy to improve outcomes. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs), such as azacitidine, decitabine, and more recently, oral decitabine/cedazuridine, are the only approved therapies for HR-MDS. These are often continued until loss of response, progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Combinations including an HMA plus other drugs have been investigated but have not demonstrated better outcomes compared to single-agent HMA. Moreover, in a disease of high genomic complexity such as HR-MDS, therapy targeting specific genomic abnormalities is of interest. This review will examine the biological underpinnings of HR-MDS, its therapeutic landscape in the frontline and relapsed settings, as well as the impact of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the only known curative intervention for this disease.

Practical considerations in clinical application of WHO 5th and ICC classification schemes for acute myeloid leukemia

The updated WHO 5th edition and ICC 2022 classification systems for AML aim to refine our diagnostic criteria and definitions of AML with deeper incorporation of cytogenetic and molecular aberrations. The two classification systems diverge, however, in numerous AML defining criteria and subclassifications, including the incorporation of blast enumeration and the integration of specific genomic mutations. These differences often create challenges for clinicians in not only establishing a diagnosis of AML, but also in determining the best treatment plan for patients. In this review, we highlight the literature surrounding the contrasting areas between the WHO and ICC guidelines and offer guidance in the clinical application of these guidelines in the management of patients with AML.

Acute myeloid leukemia: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a frequently fatal bone marrow stem cell cancer characterized by unbridled proliferation of malignant marrow stem cells with associated infection, anemia, and bleeding. An improved understanding of pathophysiology, improvements in measurement technology and at least 10 recently approved therapies have led to revamping the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic landscape of AML.

DIAGNOSIS

One updated and one new classification system were published in 2022, both emphasizing the integration of molecular analysis into daily practice. Differences between the International Consensus Classification and major revisions from the previous 2016 WHO system provide both challenges and opportunities for care and clinical research.

RISK ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING

The European Leukemia Net 2022 risk classification integrates knowledge from novel molecular findings and recent trial results, as well as emphasizing dynamic risk based on serial measurable residual disease assessment. However, how to leverage our burgeoning ability to measure a small number of potentially malignant myeloid cells into therapeutic decision making is controversial.

RISK ADAPTED THERAPY

The diagnostic and therapeutic complexity plus the availability of newly approved agents requires a nuanced therapeutic algorithm which should integrate patient goals of care, comorbidities, and disease characteristics including the specific mutational profile of the patient's AML. The framework we suggest only represents the beginning of the discussion.

The International Consensus Classification of myelodysplastic syndromes and related entities

The International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia has updated the classification of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) and placed MDS in a broader group of clonal cytopenias that includes clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) and related entities. Although subject to some interobserver variability and lack of specificity, morphologic dysplasia remains the main feature that distinguishes MDS from other clonal cytopenias and defines MDS as a hematologic malignancy. The ICC has introduced some changes in the definition of MDS whereby some cases categorized as MDS based on cytogenetic abnormalities are now classified as CCUS, while SF3B1 and multi-hit TP53 mutations are now considered to be MDS-defining in a cytopenic patient. The ICC has also recognized several cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities that reclassify some cases of MDS with excess blasts as acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and has introduced a new MDS/AML entity that encompasses cases with 10-19% blasts that lie on the continuum between MDS and AML. Two new genetically defined categories of MDS have been introduced: MDS with mutated SF3B1 and MDS with mutated TP53, the latter requiring bi-allelic aberrations in the TP53 gene. The entity MDS, unclassifiable has been eliminated. These changes have resulted in an overall simplification of the MDS classification scheme from 8 separate entities (including 1 that was genetically defined) in the revised 4th edition WHO classification to 7 separate entities (including 3 that are genetically defined) in the ICC.

Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN

The 2010 and 2017 editions of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adults are widely recognized among physicians and investigators. There have been major advances in our understanding of AML, including new knowledge about the molecular pathogenesis of AML, leading to an update of the disease classification, technological progress in genomic diagnostics and assessment of measurable residual disease, and the successful development of new therapeutic agents, such as FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, and BCL2 inhibitors. These advances have prompted this update that includes a revised ELN genetic risk classification, revised response criteria, and treatment recommendations.

International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data

The classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias was last updated in 2016 within a collaboration between the World Health Organization (WHO), the Society for Hematopathology, and the European Association for Haematopathology. This collaboration was primarily based on input from a clinical advisory committees (CACs) composed of pathologists, hematologists, oncologists, geneticists, and bioinformaticians from around the world. The recent advances in our understanding of the biology of hematologic malignancies, the experience with the use of the 2016 WHO classification in clinical practice, and the results of clinical trials have indicated the need for further revising and updating the classification. As a continuation of this CAC-based process, the authors, a group with expertise in the clinical, pathologic, and genetic aspects of these disorders, developed the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias. Using a multiparameter approach, the main objective of the consensus process was the definition of real disease entities, including the introduction of new entities and refined criteria for existing diagnostic categories, based on accumulated data. The ICC is aimed at facilitating diagnosis and prognostication of these neoplasms, improving treatment of affected patients, and allowing the design of innovative clinical trials.

A Phenogenetic Axis that Modulates Clinical Manifestation and Predicts Treatment Outcome in Primary Myeloid Neoplasms

Although the concept of "myeloid neoplasm continuum" has long been proposed, few comparative genomics studies directly tested this hypothesis. Here we report a multi-modal data analysis of 730 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with primary myeloid neoplasm, along with 462 lymphoid neoplasm cases serving as the outgroup. Our study identified a "Pan-Myeloid Axis" along which patients, genes, and phenotypic features were all aligned in sequential order. Utilizing relational information of gene mutations along the Pan-Myeloid Axis improved prognostic accuracy for complete remission and overall survival in adult patients of de novo acute myeloid leukemia and for complete remission in adult patients of myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts. We submit that better understanding of the myeloid neoplasm continuum might shed light on how treatment should be tailored to individual diseases.

Significance

The current criteria for disease diagnosis treat myeloid neoplasms as a group of distinct, separate diseases. This work provides genomics evidence for a "myeloid neoplasm continuum" and suggests that boundaries between myeloid neoplastic diseases are much more blurred than previously thought.

Distinguishing AML from MDS: a fixed blast percentage may no longer be optimal

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have conventionally received more intense therapy than patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Although less intense therapies are being used more often in AML, the dichotomy between AML and MDS remains, with the presence of ≥20% myeloblasts in marrow or peripheral blood generally regarded as defining AML. Consequently, patients with 19% blasts are typically ineligible for AML studies, and patients with 21% blasts are ineligible for MDS studies. Here we cite biologic and clinical data to question this practice. Biologically, abnormalities in chromosome 3q26 and mutations in NPM1 and FLT3, regarded as AML associated, also occur in MDS. The genetic signatures of MDS, particularly cases with 10% to 19% blasts (MDS-EB2), resemble those of AML following a preceding MDS (secondary AML). Mutationally, secondary AML appears at least as similar to MDS-EB2 as to de novo AML. Patients presenting with de novo AML but with secondary-type AML mutations seem to have the same poor prognosis associated with clinically defined secondary AML. Seattle data indicate that after accounting for European LeukemiaNet 2017 risk, age, performance status, clinically secondary AML, and treatment including allogeneic transplantation, patients with World Health Organization-defined AML (n = 769) have similar rates of overall survival, event-free survival, and complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery as patients with MDS-EB2 (n = 202). We suggest defining patients with 10% to 30% blasts (AML/MDS) as eligible for both AML and MDS studies. This would permit empiric testing of the independent effect of blast percentage on outcome, allow patients access to more therapies, and potentially simplify the regulatory approval process.

WT1 Expression Levels Combined with Flow Cytometry Blast Counts for Risk Stratification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Wilm's tumor 1 (WT1), a zinc-finger transcription factor and an epigenetic modifier, is frequently overexpressed in several hematologic disorders and solid tumors, and it has been proposed as diagnostic and prognostic marker of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, the exact role of WT1 in leukemogenesis and disease progression remains unclear. In this real-world evidence retrospective study, we investigated prognostic role of WT1-mRNA expression levels in AML and MDS patients and correlations with complete blood counts, flow cytometry counts, and molecular features. A total of 71 patients (AML, n = 46; and MDS, n = 25) were included in this study, and WT1 levels were assessed at diagnosis, during treatment and follow-up. We showed that WT1 expression levels were inversely correlated with normal hemopoiesis in both AML and MDS, and positively associated with blast counts. Flow cytometry was more sensitive and specific in distinguishing normal myeloid cells from neoplastic counterpart even just using linear parameters and CD45 expression. Moreover, we showed that a simple integrated approach combining blast counts by flow cytometry, FLT3 mutational status, and WT1 expression levels might be a useful tool for a better prognostic definition in both AML and MDS patients.

A phase I clinical trial to study the safety of treatment with tipifarnib combined with bortezomib in patients with advanced stages of myelodysplastic syndrome and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE

To determine the safety of tipifarnib in combination with escalating doses of bortezomib and to determine the maximum tolerated dose in patients with untreated high-risk MDS and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia, who were not eligible for intensive therapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In a "3 + 3″ design, patients received fixed doses of tipifarnib 200 mg bid (days 1-21) and escalating doses of bortezomib (days 8, 15, 22) every 4 weeks in 4-6 cycles.

RESULTS

The combination was tolerated well by the 11 patients in this study without reaching the maximum tolerated dose. Myelosuppression was the most frequent side effect, but usually of short duration. Interestingly a complete response with or without complete count recovery was observed in three patients and three additional patients had stable disease. The median duration of overall survival was 449 days. Two patients were still alive at 4.0 and 4.3 years, including one patient in continuing CR.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of tipifarnib and bortezomib was tolerated well and appeared to have clinical activity in patients with high-risk MDS and AML with low counts of marrow blasts. Our results warrant further evaluation in a phase II study.

Controversies in the recent (2016) World Health Organization classification of acute myeloid leukemia

The current World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), developed in 2016 and published in 2017, codifies the defining features of AML and recognizes several subtypes based on clinical, morphologic, and genetic features. This classification is widely used for the purposes of assigning patients to specific therapeutic approaches and entry into clinical trials. Although the WHO Classification ultimately has its origins in the original 1976 French-American-British Classification, it has been periodically updated by the incorporation of a large body of evidence and input from both diagnosticians and clinicians who study and treat AML. Nevertheless, the recent accumulation of genetic data on the molecular underpinnings of myeloid neoplasms as well as numerous recently approved novel therapies have highlighted areas of controversy in how we currently define and classify AML; the 2016 WHO Classification will continually be revised and updated in future versions based on these advances. The purpose of this review is to explore areas of potential refinement in the current WHO Classification of AML, both in terms of its criteria defining the disease as well as the specific disease subtypes.

Comparison of myeloid blast counts and variant allele frequencies of gene mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts and secondary acute myeloid leukemia

Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) is biologically and clinically distinct from de novo AML and shares specific genetic mutations with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We retrospectively analyzed data from 295 adults with MDS or AML with mutational analysis by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and examined differences in functional grouping of mutations and relation between morphologic blast count and variant allele frequency (VAF) of mutations. Our analysis showed the distribution of mutations differed in MDS and AML. However, these differences largely disappeared when we compared MDS with excess blasts (MDS-EB) and sAML. VAF of mutations generally did not correlate with morphologic blast count and the distribution of VAF was similar above and below the 20% cutpoint. Complete remission (CR) rate was similar in MDS-EB and sAML following high intensity therapy and survival was also similar. These results support that MDS-EB and sAML have overlapping features and may represent a spectrum of the same disease.Key pointsThe distribution of genetic mutations is similar in myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts (MDS-EB) and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) regardless of morphologic blast count.Variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of gene mutations do not correlate well with morphologic blast counts, particularly in MDS-EB and sAML.Complete remission (CR) rate was similar in MDS-EB and sAML following high intensity or low intensity therapy.

Myelodysplastic Syndromes: How to Recognize Risk and Avoid Acute Myeloid Leukemia Transformation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To understand how myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) transform to AML and to describe how transformation can be predicted and prevented.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent genomic analyses have shown that MDS progression to AML is associated with clonal expansion and clonal evolution. Mutation profiles of MDS change during progression and new mutations in signaling genes and transcription factors emerge. AML transformation can be predicted by several parameters including International Prognostic Scoring System IPSS risk category and transfusion requirements. The prognostic relevance of the acquisition of some gene mutations (i.e., IDH1 and 2, CBL, FT3, RAS, NPM1, TP53, and ASXL1) has to be prospectively validated. The most effective preventive therapy for AML transformation is allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Hypomethylating agents have been associated with prolonged time to AML transformation even in patients who did not achieve an objective response. The recent progress in the understanding of the molecular events leading to transformation and the event of new effective therapies open new avenues for a better prediction and prevention of AML transformation in patients with MDS.

[Myelodysplastic syndromes]

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)-previously called "preleukemias"-are clonal diseases of the pluripotent hematopoietic stem cell. Their hallmark is peripheral cytopenias. Early forms are characterized by dysplasia of mature cells in the peripheral blood or erythropoiesis, granulopoiesis or megakaryocytes in the bone marrow, and later stages tend to accumulate blasts. About 30% transform into acute myeloid leukemia. MDS are diseases of the elderly and are prognostically divided into lower and higher risk diseases. Median survival times vary accordingly between 6 months and 10 years. Chromosomal abnormalities are identified in 50% of patients, and single or multiple gene mutations occur in 80%. They are the driving force leading to abnormalities in differentiation and to the accumulation of blasts in the bone marrow. Therapeutic options include supportive care, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, demethylating agents, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Graft-versus-MDS effect after unrelated cord blood transplantation: a retrospective analysis of 752 patients registered at the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the sole curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, there is concern regarding graft failure and relapse in patients who undergo cord blood transplantation (CBT). We conducted a retrospective study of the CBT outcomes in MDS patients using the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation database. Seven hundred fifty-two de novo MDS patients of ≥18 years of age (median, 58 years) undergoing their first CBT between 2001 and 2015 were examined. Two-thirds of the patients were male, and were RAEB. The cumulative incidences of neutrophil and platelet engraftment at day 100 were 77 and 59%, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 41% and the median survival of the patients was 1.25 years. A multivariate analysis of pre-transplant variables showed that the age, gender, cytogenetic subgroups, number of RBC transfusions, HCT-CI and year of CBT significantly influenced the outcome. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 32 and 21%, respectively. A survival benefit was observed in patients who developed cGVHD, but not aGVHD. Our results suggest that CBT is an acceptable alternative graft and that a graft-versus-MDS effect can be expected, especially in patients who develop cGVHD.

Clinical and biological characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia with 20-29% blasts: a retrospective single-center study

It is controversial whether acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with 20-29% bone marrow (BM) blasts should be considered AML or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We retrospectively studied 382 patients, including 108 AML with 20-29% BM blasts (AML20-29), 210 AML with ≥30% BM blasts (AML ≥ 30), and 64 MDS with 10-19% BM blasts (MDS-EB2). We found that AML20-29 were more similar to MDS-EB2 in terms of advanced age, less blood count, the increased presence of poor-risk cytogenetics. The frequency of mutated genes in AML20-29 had both the characters of AML and MDS. Median overall survival of AML20-29 and MDS-EB2 were similar and shorter than those of AML ≥ 30 (p = .045). Multivariate analysis showed inferior survival with increased age, low platelet count and FLT3 mutations. Our findings suggest that AML20-29 have clinical features more similar to MDS than AML.

Acute myeloid leukemia: 2019 update on risk-stratification and management

Outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ranges from death within a few days of beginning treatment (treatment related mortality, TRM) to likely cure. The major reason patients are not cured is resistance to treatment, often manifested as relapse from remission, rather than, even in older patients, TRM, whose incidence is decreasing. Knowledge of the pre-treatment mutation status of various genes has improved our ability to assign initial treatment and, of particular importance, knowledge of whether patients ostensibly in remission have measurable residual disease should influence subsequent management. Several new drugs have been approved by the FDA and we discuss their role in treatment.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Myelodysplastic Syndromes after Treatment with Hypomethylating Agents

The prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) after failure of hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapy is poor. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can be effective in curing patients who have failed therapy with HMA. However, published results have not addressed the outcomes with HCT in this setting. We identified 125 MDS patients who had been treated with HMA and underwent subsequent HCT. Among these, 68 were considered HMA failures and 57 responders. Failure was defined as progression to higher grade MDS or acute myeloid leukemia, lack of hematologic improvement after at least 4 HMA cycles, or loss of response after initial improvement. Response was defined as showing at least hematologic improvement. Outcomes were compared using Cox regression. Overall, 73 of 125 HMA-treated patients (58%) had died by the time of last contact. Median follow-up of survivors, measured from HCT, was 41.9 months (range, 2.7 to 98.5). The estimated probability of relapse at 3 years was 56.6% and 34.2% among failing and responding patients, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 3.66; P < .01). The estimated probability of relapse-free survival at 3 years was 23.8% and 42% in failing and responding patients, respectively (HR for relapse/death, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.95; P < .01). The risk of nonrelapse mortality was similar for both groups (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, .52 to 2.39; P = .77). Failure of treatment with HMA was associated with higher risk of post-HCT relapse than observed in patients responding to HMA. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of novel conditioning regimens and post-HCT maintenance strategies in patients who have failed HMA pre-HCT.

Genetic abnormalities in myelodysplasia and secondary acute myeloid leukemia: impact on outcome of stem cell transplantation

Genetic alterations, including mutations and copy-number alterations, are central to the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes and related diseases (myelodysplasia), but their roles in allogeneic stem cell transplantation have not fully been studied in a large cohort of patients. We enrolled 797 patients who had been diagnosed with myelodysplasia at initial presentation and received transplantation via the Japan Marrow Donor Program. Targeted-capture sequencing was performed to identify mutations in 69 genes, together with copy-number alterations, whose effects on transplantation outcomes were investigated. We identified 1776 mutations and 927 abnormal copy segments among 617 patients (77.4%). In multivariate modeling using Cox proportional-hazards regression, genetic factors explained 30% of the total hazards for overall survival; clinical characteristics accounted for 70% of risk. TP53 and RAS-pathway mutations, together with complex karyotype (CK) as detected by conventional cytogenetics and/or sequencing-based analysis, negatively affected posttransplant survival independently of clinical factors. Regardless of disease subtype, TP53-mutated patients with CK were characterized by unique genetic features and associated with an extremely poor survival with frequent early relapse, whereas outcomes were substantially better in TP53-mutated patients without CK. By contrast, the effects of RAS-pathway mutations depended on disease subtype and were confined to myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPNs). Our results suggest that TP53 and RAS-pathway mutations predicted a dismal prognosis, when associated with CK and MDS/MPNs, respectively. However, for patients with mutated TP53 or CK alone, long-term survival could be obtained with transplantation. Clinical sequencing provides vital information for accurate prognostication in transplantation.

Acute myeloid leukemia - strategies and challenges for targeting oncogenic Hedgehog/GLI signaling

Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), an aggressive and heterogeneous hematological malignancy, remains a challenge. Despite advances in our understanding of the complex genetics and biology of AML pathophysiology, these findings have been translated to the clinic with only limited success, and poor outcomes persist for the majority of patients. Thus, novel treatment strategies are clearly needed for achieving deeper and prolonged remissions and for avoiding the development of resistance. Due to its profound role in (cancer) stem cell biology and differentiation, the Hedgehog (HH)/Glioma-associated Oncogene Homolog (GLI) signaling pathway may be an attractive novel therapeutic target in AML. In this review, we aim to provide a critical and concise overview of the currently known potential and challenges of HH/GLI targeting. We describe the biological role of the HH/GLI pathway in AML pathophysiology. We specifically focus on ways of targeting non-canonical HH/GLI signaling in AML, particularly in combination with standard treatment regimens, which may overcome some hurdles observed with approved HH pathway inhibitors in solid tumors.

Acute myeloid leukemia: 2016 Update on risk-stratification and management

Evidence suggest that even patients aged 70 or above benefit from specific AML therapy. The fundamental decision in AML then becomes whether to recommend standard or investigational treatment. This decision must rest on the likely outcome of standard treatment. Hence we review factors that predict treatment related mortality and resistance to therapy, the latter the principal cause of failure even in patients aged 70 or above. We emphasize the limitations of prediction of resistance based only on pre- treatment factors and stress the need to incorporate post-treatment factors, for example indicators of minimal residual disease. We review various newer therapeutic options and considerations that underlie the decision to recommend allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Am. J. Hematol. 91:825-846, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Treatment patterns and comparative effectiveness in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients (age 70 years or older): the Lyon-university hospital experience

The treatment of very elderly patients (≥70 years) with acute myeloid leukemia remains controversial. We present here 302 patients seen over a 14-year period in order to understand the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in this patient population. Less than 25% of patients achieved a complete remission. The median overall survival was 12.4, 11.5 and 2.6 months, with a 3-year rates of 27%, 17% and 6%, for non-acute promyelocytic leukemia patients receiving intensive chemotherapy, lower-intensity therapy or best supportive care (BSC), respectively. In all ages, results were not significantly different among patients receiving low-intensity therapy and intensive chemotherapy, but significantly worse in those treated with BSC only. Similarly, intensive chemotherapy and low-intensity therapy gave better survival rates than BSC in patients with favorable- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics and in those with unfavorable cytogenetics (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.04, respectively).

Azacitidine front-line in 339 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia: comparison of French-American-British and World Health Organization classifications

BACKGROUND

The MDS-IWG and NCCN currently endorse both FAB and WHO classifications of MDS and AML, thus allowing patients with 20-30 % bone marrow blasts (AML20-30, formerly MDS-RAEB-t) to be categorised and treated as either MDS or AML. In addition, an artificial distinction between AML20-30 and AML30+ was made by regulatory agencies by initially restricting approval of azacitidine to AML20-30. Thus, uncertainty prevails regarding the diagnosis, prognosis and optimal treatment timing and strategy for patients with AML20-30. Here, we aim to provide clarification for patients treated with azacitidine front-line.

METHODS

The Austrian Azacitidine Registry is a multicentre database (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01595295). For this analysis, we selected 339 patients treated with azacitidine front-line. According to the WHO classification 53, 96 and 190 patients had MDS-RAEB-I, MDS-RAEB-II and AML (AML20-30: n = 79; AML30+: n = 111), respectively. According to the FAB classification, 131, 101 and 111 patients had MDS-RAEB, MDS-RAEB-t and AML, respectively.

RESULTS

The median ages of patients with MDS and AML were 72 (range 37-87) and 77 (range 23-93) years, respectively. Overall, 80 % of classifiable patients (≤30 % bone marrow blasts) had intermediate-2 or high-risk IPSS scores. Most other baseline, treatment and response characteristics were similar between patients diagnosed with MDS or AML. WHO-classified patients with AML20-30 had significantly worse OS than patients with MDS-RAEB-II (13.1 vs 18.9 months; p = 0.010), but similar OS to patients with AML30+ (10.9 vs 13.1 months; p = 0.238). AML patients that showed MDS-related features did not have worse outcomes compared with patients who did not (13.2 vs 8.9 months; p = 0.104). FAB-classified patients with MDS-RAEB-t had similar survival to patients with AML30+ (12.8 vs 10.9 months; p = 0.376), but significantly worse OS than patients with MDS-RAEB (10.9 vs 24.4 months; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate the validity of the WHO classification of MDS and AML, and its superiority over the former FAB classification, for patients treated with azacitidine front-line. Neither bone marrow blast count nor presence of MDS-related features had an adverse prognostic impact on survival. Patients with AML20-30 should therefore be regarded as having 'true AML' and in our opinion treatment should be initiated without delay.

The safety of treatment options for elderly people with acute myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Life expectancy in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a function of age, disability, and co-morbidity, combined with leukemia characteristics. There is currently no consensus regarding the optimal therapeutic strategy for older adults with AML. Although selected older adults with AML can benefit from intensive therapies, recent evidence supports the use of lower-intensity therapies in most patients and emphasizes the importance of tolerability and quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

Results of the current clinical trials and safety data are reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Treatment recommendations for elderly patients with AML need to be individualized. In order to avoid toxicities, hematologists should collaborate more with geriatricians to identify clues of vulnerability in elderly patients through the study of functional physical, physiological, cognitive, social, and psychological parameters.

Interactions and relevance of blast percentage and treatment strategy among younger and older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is defined as ≥20% myeloblasts, representing a change from original guidelines where ≤30% blasts were considered as myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and 20-29% blasts classified as refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEB-T). Whether the diagnostic bone marrow blast percentage has current value with regards to patient prognostication or identification of optimal treatment strategies is unclear. We retrospectively studied 1652 treatment-naïve adults with MDS or AML and ≥10% blasts from January 2000 to April 2014. Patients with 20-29% blasts were more similar to MDS patients in terms of advanced age, increased frequency of poor-risk cytogenetics, lower WBC count, and less frequent NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutations. Median overall survival of MDS and RAEB-T were similar, 16.0 and 16.0 months, compared to 13.5 months for AML with ≥30% blasts (P = 0.045). Multivariate analysis showed inferior survival with increased age (HR 1.81 age 60-69, HR 2.68 age ≥70, P < 0.0005); poor-risk cytogenetics (HR 2.25, P < 0.0005); therapy-related disease (HR 1.44, P < 0.0005); and markers of proliferative disease including WBC ≥25 × 10(9) /L (HR 1.35, P = 0.0003), elevated LDH count (HR 1.24, P = 0.0015), and peripheral blasts (HR 1.25, P = 0.004). Among younger patients (≤60 years), intensive AML-type therapy resulted in similar outcomes regardless of blast percentage, suggesting this to be optimal therapy in this context. Among older patients (≥70 years), patients with 20-29% blasts had similar outcomes to patients with <20% blasts, and better than those with ≥30% blasts. In addition, among older patients, epigenetic therapy provided at least equivalent outcome to intensive chemotherapy.

Acute myeloid leukemia--major progress over four decades and glimpses into the future

In this Review, the progress in research and therapy of acute myeloid leukemia is detailed.

Efficacy and safety of homoharringtonine plus cytarabine and aclarubicin for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-RAEB

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the treatment outcome of homoharringtonine, cytarabine (AraC) and aclarubicin combination therapy as induction treatment for myelodysplastic syndromes-refractory anemia with excess blasts (MDS-RAEB). A total of 24 patients with MDS-RAEB who were aged between 18 and 66 years were treated with homoharringtonine, AraC and aclarubicin (HAA regimen). The HAA regimen consisted of homoharringtonine (2 mg/m² intramuscularly twice daily, days 1-3), AraC (75 mg/m² injected subcutaneously twice daily, days 1-7) and aclarubicin (12 mg/m², days 1-7). The overall response rate was 79% with a complete remission rate of 58.3% and partial remission rate of 20.7%. There was no evidence of early mortality in this group of patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 36.2 months (95% confidence interval, 24.6-47.4 months), and the estimated three year overall survival rate was 45.8%. In conclusion, HAA combination therapy is a suitable induction regimen for patients with MDS-RAEB, which may improve the outcome for de novo higher-risk MDS patients, particularly of those with favorable and intermediate cytogenetics.

Idarubicin and cytarabine in combination with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (IAGO) for untreated patients with high-risk MDS or AML evolved from MDS: a phase II study from the EORTC and GIMEMA Leukemia Groups (protocol 06013)

The primary objective of this trial was to assess the feasibility, toxicity profile, and antitumor activity of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) combined with a chemotherapy remission-induction regimen in adults with untreated high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). In this phase II trial, 30 patients with median age of 58 years received 1 day of GO as a 1-h infusion at the dose level of 5 mg/m² on day 7 of the remission-induction course further consisting of a continuous infusion of cytarabine 100 mg/m²/day for 10 days and idarubicin 12 mg/m²/day on days 1, 3, and 5. A consolidation course, consisting of intermediate-dose cytarabine (A) and idarubicin (I) followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was planned for patients in complete remission (CR). The primary endpoints were response rate (CR/CRi) and severe toxicity rate. The secondary endpoint(s) were survival and progression-free survival (PFS) from start of treatment. Thirteen patients (43 %) achieved CR (eight patients) or CR with incomplete hematopoietic recovery (CRi) (five patients). In patients who achieved CR or CRi, the median time to recovery of neutrophils to 0.5 × 10⁹/l and of platelets to >50 × 10⁹/l was 29 and 30 days, respectively. Grade 3 to 4 severe toxicities occurred in nine patients. The most prominent was liver toxicity, as shown by elevated bilirubin levels in 16 patients and one case of nonfatal veno-occlusive disease (VOD). All 13 patients with CR/CRi received consolidation therapy, which was followed by allogeneic HSCT in five patients and autologous HSCT in three patients. According to the statistical design of the study, the idarubicin and cytarabine in combination with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (IAGO) regimen did not show sufficient activity to warrant further exploration of this regimen in adult patients with HR-MDS or sAML.

Economic analysis of blood product transfusions according to the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Blood transfusion requirement represents one of the most significant cost driver associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Low-intensity treatments (low-dose cytarabine, hypomethylating agents) have the potential to reduce transfusion dependence, and improve health-related quality of life.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We assessed the cost-effectiveness of treatment types regarding blood product transfusions in a cohort of 214 AML patients aged ≥ 70 years.

RESULTS

Analyzes did not indicate any significant overall survival (OS) advantage of intensive chemotherapy comparatively to low-intensity treatment. The difference was significant when compared to best supportive care (BSC) (P<0.0001). Blood products transfusion cost per patient was 1.3 times lower with low-intensity therapy and 2.7 times lower with BSC than with intensive chemotherapy. Mean transfusion cost per patient according to OS varied from 2.4 to 1.3 times less with low-intensity treatment comparatively to intensive chemotherapy for patients having OS ≤ 13.3 months. Costs varied from 3.5 to 2.6 times less with BSC comparatively to intensive chemotherapy. In contrast, mean transfusion costs were comparable among treatments for patients with OS>13.3 months.

CONCLUSION

Low-intensity treatments represent a cost-effective alternative to BSC and require a reduced number of transfused blood products comparatively to intensive chemotherapy, while OS was not significantly different.

Prior cytopenia predicts worse clinical outcome in acute myeloid leukemia

The prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is influenced by both disease-intrinsic and patient-related factors. In particular, AML following myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, AML-MRC) has a poor prognosis. We hypothesized that patients with cytopenias prior to AML, but no known prior MDS, may share biologic features with AML-MRC. We evaluated 140 AML patients without prior MDS who had complete blood count (CBC) data available 6-36 months prior to their diagnosis. Cytopenia, defined as clinically unexplained thrombocytopenia or macrocytic anemia, was present in 29/140 (21%) patients. Compared to non-cytopenic patients, AML patients with prior cytopenia were older and more often met morphologic or cytogenetic criteria for AML-MRC. Prior cytopenia was associated with shorter survival in patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics (median OS 4.2 versus 24.1 months, p<0.0001), but not in patients with adverse-risk cytogenetics (median OS 4.4 versus 6.0 months, p=0.57). Prior thrombocytopenia, but not macrocytic anemia, was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (p=0.01) independent of treatment approach, karyotype risk, and age on multivariable analysis. Our data suggest that AML patients with prior cytopenias have features similar to AML-MRC, and in particular support the use of prior unexplained thrombocytopenia as an independent marker of high-risk disease.

De novo acute myeloid leukemia with 20-29% blasts is less aggressive than acute myeloid leukemia with ≥30% blasts in older adults: a Bone Marrow Pathology Group study

It is controversial whether acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with 20-29% bone marrow (BM) blasts, formerly referred to as refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEBT), should be considered AML or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) for the purposes of treatment and prognostication. We retrospectively studied 571 de novo AML in patients aged >50 years, including 142 RAEBT and 429 with ≥30% blasts (AML30), as well as 151 patients with 10-19% BM blasts (RAEB2). RAEBT patients were older and had lower white blood count, but higher hemoglobin, platelet count, and karyotype risk scores compared to AML30, while these features were similar to RAEB2. FLT3 and NPM1 mutations and monocytic morphology occurred more commonly in AML30 than in RAEBT. RAEBT patients were treated less often with induction therapy than AML30, whereas allogeneic stem cell transplant frequency was similar. The median and 4-year OS of RAEBT patients were longer than those of AML30 patients (20.5 vs 12.0 months and 28.6% vs 20.4%, respectively, P = 0.003); this difference in OS was manifested in patients in the intermediate UKMRC karyotype risk group, whereas OS of RAEBT patients and AML30 patients in the adverse karyotype risk group were not significantly different. Multivariable analysis showed that RAEBT (P < 0.0001), hemoglobin (P = 0.005), UKMRC karyotype risk group (P = 0.002), normal BM karyotype (P = 0.004), treatment with induction therapy (P < 0.0001), and stem cell transplant (P < 0.0001) were associated with longer OS. Our findings favor considering de novo RAEBT as a favorable prognostic subgroup of AML.

Pneumonia during remission induction chemotherapy in patients with acute leukemia

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia is a major cause of death during induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia. The purpose of this study was to quantify the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of pneumonia in patients with acute leukemia.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 801 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) who underwent induction chemotherapy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Pneumonia was present at induction start in 85 patients (11%). Of the 716 remaining patients, 148 (21%) developed pneumonia. The incidence rate of pneumonia was higher in MDS and AML than in ALL (0.013 vs. 0.008 vs. 0.003 pneumonias per day, respectively; P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, age greater than or equal to 60 years, AML, low platelet count, low albumin level, neutropenia, and neutrophil count greater than 7,300 were risk factors. The case fatality rate of pneumonia was 17% (40 of 233). Competing risk analysis demonstrated that in the absence of pneumonia, death was rare: 28-day mortality was 6.2% for all patients but only 1.26% in those without pneumonia. Compared with patients without pneumonia, patients with pneumonia had more intensive care unit days, longer hospital stays, and 49% higher costs (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumonia after induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia continues to be common, and it is the most important determinant of early mortality after induction chemotherapy. Given the high incidence, morbidity, mortality, and cost of pneumonia, interventions aimed at prevention are warranted in patients with acute leukemia.

Outcome of acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome according to health insurance status

BACKGROUND

Age, cytogenetic status, and molecular features are the most important prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of patients with AML or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) according to insurance status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed, covering all patients with AML and high-risk MDS evaluated and treated at Akron General Medical Center between 2002 and 2012. A Cox regression model was analyzed to account for survival over time, adjusted for insurance type, while controlling for patient age at diagnosis and patient risk of mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 130 adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) were identified. Insurance information was available for 97 patients enrolled in the study; 3 were excluded because of self-pay status. Cox regression analysis with insurance type as the predictor found that overall survival declines over time and that the rate of decline may be influenced by insurance type (χ(2)(2) = 6.4; P = .044). The likelihood of survival in patients with Medicaid or Medicare without supplemental insurance was .552 (95% CI, .338-.903; P = .018) times the likelihood in patients who had Medicare with supplemental insurance. To explain the difference, variables of age, gender, and risk of mortality were added to the model. Age and risk of mortality were found to be significant predictors of survival. The addition of insurance type to the model did not significantly contribute (χ(2)(3) = 3.83; P = .147).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference in overall survival was observed when patients with AML or high-risk MDS were analyzed according to their health insurance status. The overall survival was low in this study compared with the national average. Early referral to a specialized center or possible clinical trial enrollment may be a good alternative to improve outcome.

Acute myeloid leukaemia in Western Australia 1991-2005: a retrospective population-based study of 898 patients regarding epidemiology, cytogenetics, treatment and outcome

BACKGROUND

Patient characteristics and cytogenetics of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in clinical trials do not reflect that of the general population. There has not been a large population-based study that has examined cytogenetic features and outcomes of AML in Australia.

AIM

Investigation of epidemiological, prognostic, treatment and outcome data in adults diagnosed with AML in Western Australia between 1991 and 2005.

METHODS

Patients were identified utilising the Western Australia Cancer Registry, cytogenetic databases and hospital inpatient discharge diagnoses. Data were retrospectively collected from patients presenting to tertiary hospitals on patient characteristics, karyotype, induction therapy, remission, transplantation and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 987 patients with AML was identified, of which 91% (898) attended a tertiary hospital. Median age was 67 years and 45% of cases represented secondary AML. Cytogenetic analysis was available in 81% of patients. Frequent karyotypes were normal (38.8%), complex (13.8%) and -7/add(7q)/del(7q) (12.1%). Aggressive therapy was initiated in 62.6%. Less than 15% were enrolled in clinical trials. Overall 16.5% received a stem cell transplant. Median overall survival for all patients was 5.6 months. In patients treated aggressively, complete remission was achieved in 56.9% and median overall survival was 12.2 months. Age, secondary disease and karyotype were significantly predictive of remission and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Age distribution, remission and survival rates were comparable with published population-based studies. High median age was reflected in the rate of secondary AML and trial eligibility. These findings highlight the need for prospective data collection.

Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in older patients

Acute myeloid leukemia carries a dismal prognosis in patients over 60 years of age and, despite many clinical trials of both novel and conventional agents, there has been no significant improvement in overall survival during the last 30 years. Combinations of anthracyclines and cytarabine remain the cornerstone of therapy and produce complete remission in 45-55% of older patients, with a median survival of only 8-12 months. These statistics become even worse in patients over 70 years and those with unfavorable cytogenetics and/or poor performance status. Deciding which older acute myeloid leukemia patients would benefit from intensive chemotherapy is difficult and efforts are underway to improve existing risk-assessment tools. Many new agents are under development, including signal transduction inhibitors, farnesyl transferase inhibitors, antibodies and novel chemotherapeutics. To date, small-molecule inhibitors and targeted therapies have had limited single-agent efficacy and have required combination with chemotherapy. The role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in older patients is under investigation. All patients over 60 years of age with acute myeloid leukemia should be encouraged to participate in a clinical trial if possible.

Discovering transcription and splicing networks in myelodysplastic syndromes

More and more transcription factors and their motifs have been reported and linked to specific gene expression levels. However, focusing only on transcription is not sufficient for mechanism research. Most genes, especially in eukaryotes, are alternatively spliced to different isoforms. Some of these isoforms increase the biodiversity of proteins. From this viewpoint, transcription and splicing are two of important mechanisms to modulate expression levels of isoforms. To integrate these two kinds of regulation, we built a linear regression model to select a subset of transcription factors and splicing factors for each co-expressed isoforms using least-angle regression approach. Then, we applied this method to investigate the mechanism of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), a precursor lesion of acute myeloid leukemia. Results suggested that expression levels of most isoforms were regulated by a set of selected regulatory factors. Some of the detected factors, such as EGR1 and STAT family, are highly correlated with progression of MDS. We discovered that the splicing factor SRSF11 experienced alternative splicing switch, and in turn induced different amino acid sequences between MDS and controls. This splicing switch causes two different splicing mechanisms. Polymerase Chain Reaction experiments also confirmed that one of its isoforms was over-expressed in MDS. We analyzed the regulatory networks constructed from the co-expressed isoforms and their regulatory factors in MDS. Many of these networks were enriched in the herpes simplex infection pathway which involves many splicing factors, and pathways in cancers and acute or chronic myeloid leukemia.

The role of hypomethylating agents in the treatment of elderly patients with AML

There is a major unmet medical need for treatment options in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are deemed ineligible for intensive treatment. The recent approval of decitabine in the European Union for the treatment of patients with AML≥ 65 years old highlights the potential for hypomethylating agents in this setting. Here, we review evidence to support the use of hypomethylating agents in elderly patients and emphasize the importance of tolerability and quality of life considerations. We focus on the rationale for the continued clinical development of the ribonucleoside analog azacitidine in this setting. We discuss potential differences in the activity of azacitidine and decitabine in different patient subgroups that could possibly be explained by important differences in mechanism of action. Finally, we assess practical challenges that will be faced when integrating hypomethylating agents into clinical practice, such as how to define ineligibility for intensive treatment.

Diagnosis and treatment of primary myelodysplastic syndromes in adults: recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet

Within the myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) work package of the European LeukemiaNet, an Expert Panel was selected according to the framework elements of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program. A systematic review of the literature was performed that included indexed original papers, indexed reviews and educational papers, and abstracts of conference proceedings. Guidelines were developed on the basis of a list of patient- and therapy-oriented questions, and recommendations were formulated and ranked according to the supporting level of evidence. MDSs should be classified according to the 2008 World Health Organization criteria. An accurate risk assessment requires the evaluation of not only disease-related factors but also of those related to extrahematologic comorbidity. The assessment of individual risk enables the identification of fit patients with a poor prognosis who are candidates for up-front intensive treatments, primarily allogeneic stem cell transplantation. A high proportion of MDS patients are not eligible for potentially curative treatment because of advanced age and/or clinically relevant comorbidities and poor performance status. In these patients, the therapeutic intervention is aimed at preventing cytopenia-related morbidity and preserving quality of life. A number of new agents are being developed for which the available evidence is not sufficient to recommend routine use. The inclusion of patients into prospective clinical trials is strongly recommended.

Epigenetic therapy is associated with similar survival compared with intensive chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia

We reviewed the outcome of 671 patients 65 years of age or older with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated at our institution between 2000 and 2010 with intensive chemotherapy (n = 557) or azacitidine- or decitabine-based therapy (n = 114). Both groups were balanced according to cytogenetics and performance status. The complete response rates with chemotherapy and epigenetic therapy were 42% and 28%, respectively (P = .001), and the 8-week mortality 18% and 11%, respectively (P = .075). Two-year relapse-free survival rates (28% vs 39%, P = .843) and median survival (6.7 vs 6.5 months, P = .413) were similar in the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis identified older age, adverse cytogenetics, poor performance status, elevated creatinine, peripheral blood and BM blasts, and hemoglobin, but not type of AML therapy, as independent prognostic factors for survival. No outcome differences were observed according to cytogenetics, FLT3 mutational status, age, or performance status by therapy type. Decitabine was associated with improved median overall survival compared with azacitidine (5.5 vs 8.8 months, respectively, P = .03). Survival after failure of intensive chemotherapy, azacitidine, or decitabine was more favorable in patients who had previously received decitabine (1.1 vs 0.9 vs 3.1 months, respectively, P = .109). The results of the present study show that epigenetic therapy is associated with similar survival rates as intensive chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed AML. The studies reviewed are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as 2009-0172 (NCT00926731) and 2009-0217 (NCT00952588).

Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly

SUMMARY Acute myeloid leukemia in older patients is of poor outcome, characterized by a specific biology of acute myeloid leukemia and factors related to the patient’s physical condition. Aggressive therapy results in improved survival and quality of life when compared with palliative care. However, not all patients are candidates for such therapy. Disease often demonstrates resistance related to poor-risk cytogenetics, and patients are often unable to tolerate intensive chemotherapy. For those patients, novel agents are being investigated. Understanding of the disease biology, as well as the prognostic factors associated with the host, allows the better estimation of which patients are likely to benefit from standard therapy and which require alternative approaches.

Acute myeloid leukemia: 2012 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) results from accumulation of abnormal immature cells in the marrow. These cells interfere with normal hematopoiesis can escape into the blood and infiltrate lung and CNS. The most common cause of death is bone marrow failure. It is likely that many different mutations and/or epigenetic aberrations can produce the same disease, with these differences responsible for the very variable response to therapy, which is AML's principal clinical feature.

DIAGNOSIS

This rests on demonstration that the marrow or blood has >20% blasts of myeloid lineage. Blast lineage is assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry with CD33 and CD13 being surface markers typically expressed by myeloid blasts. It should be realized that clinical/prognostic considerations, not the blast % per se, should be the main factor determining how a patient is treated.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Two features determine risk: the probability of treatment-related mortality (TRM) and, more important, even in patients aged >75 with Zubrod performance status 1, the probability of resistance to standard therapy despite not incurring TRM. The chief predictor of resistance is cytogenetics with a monosomal karyotype (MK) denoting the disease is essentially incurable with standard therapy even if followed by a standard allogeneic transplant (HCT). The most common cytogenetic finding is a normal karyotype (NK) and those of such patients with an NPM1 mutation but no FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD), or with a CEBPA mutation, have a prognosis similar to that of patients with the most favorable cytogenetics [inv(16) or t(8;21)] (60-70% cure rate). In contrast, NK patients with a FLT3 ITD have only a 30-40% chance of cure even after HCT. Accordingly analyses of NPM1, FLT3, and CEBPA should be part of routine evaluation, much as is cytogenetics. Risk is best assessed considering several variables simultaneously rather than, for example, only age.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Patients with inv(16) or t(8;21) or who are NPM1+/FLT3ITD- can receive standard therapy (daunorubicin + cytarabine) and should not receive HCT in first CR. It seems likely that use of a daily daunorubicin dose of 90 mg/m(2) will further improve outcome in these patients. There appears no reason to use doses of cytarabine > 1 g/m(2) (for example, bid × 6 days), as opposed to the more commonly used 3 g/m(2) . Patients with an unfavorable karyotype (particularly MK) are unlikely to benefit from standard therapy (even with dose escalation) and are thus prime candidates for clinical trials of new drugs or new approaches to HCT; the latter should be done in first CR. Patients with intermediate prognoses (for example, NK and NPM and FLT3ITD negative) should also receive HCT in first CR and can plausibly receive either investigational or standard induction therapy, with the same prognostic information about standard therapy leading one patient to choose the standard and another an investigational option.