Etretinate Therapy for Refractory Sclerodermatous Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Analyses and Correlation of Pathologic and Ocular Cutaneous Changes in Murine Graft versus Host Disease

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is initiated by donor allo-reactive T cells activated against recipient antigens. Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) is characterized by immune responses that may resemble autoimmune features present in the scleroderma and Sjogren's syndrome. Unfortunately, ocular involvement occurs in approximately 60-90% of patients with cGVHD following allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplants (aHSCT). Ocular GVHD (oGVHD) may affect vision due to ocular adnexa damage leading to dry eye and keratopathy. Several other compartments including the skin are major targets of GVHD effector pathways. Using mouse aHSCT models, the objective was to characterize cGVHD associated alterations in the eye and skin to assess for correlations between these two organs. The examination of multiple models of MHC-matched and MHC-mismatched aHSCT identified a correlation between ocular and cutaneous involvement accompanying cGVHD. Studies detected a "positive" correlation, i.e., when cGVHD-induced ocular alterations were observed, cutaneous compartment alterations were also observed. When no or minimal ocular signs were detected, no or minimal skin changes were observed. In total, these findings suggest underlying cGVHD-inducing pathological immune mechanisms may be shared between the eye and skin. Based on the present observations, we posit that when skin involvement is present in aHSCT patients with cGVHD, the evaluation of the ocular surface by an ophthalmologist could potentially be of value.

Review of Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is an adverse immunologic phenomenon following allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Cutaneous manifestations are the earliest and most common presentation of the disease. This article describes the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment options available for acute and chronic GVHD. Acute and chronic GVHD result from an initial insult triggering an exaggerated inflammatory cascade. Clinical presentation for cutaneous acute GVHD is limited to maculopapular rash and oral mucosal lesions, whereas chronic GVHD can also include nail, scalp, and genitalia changes. Diagnosis is often made clinically and supported by biopsy, laboratory and radiology findings.

B cells in chronic graft-versus-host disease

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) is the definitive therapy for numerous otherwise incurable hematologic malignancies and non-malignant diseases. The genetic disparity between donor and recipient both underpins therapeutic effects and confers donor immune system-mediated damage in the recipient, called graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) is a major cause of late post-transplant morbidity and mortality. B cells have a substantiated role in cGVHD pathogenesis, as first demonstrated by clinical response to the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab. Initiation of CD20 blockade is met at times with limited therapeutic success that has been associated with altered peripheral B cell homeostasis and excess B Cell Activating Factor of the TNF family (BAFF). Increased BAFF to B cell ratios are associated with the presence of circulating, constitutively activated B cells in patients with cGVHD. These cGVHD patient B cells have increased survival capacity and signal through both BAFF-associated and B Cell Receptor (BCR) signaling pathways. Proximal BCR signaling molecules, Syk and BTK, appear to be hyper-activated in cGVHD B cells and can be targeted with small molecule inhibitors. Murine studies have confirmed roles for Syk and BTK in development of cGVHD. Emerging evidence has prompted investigation of several small molecule inhibitors in an attempt to restore B cell homeostasis and potentially target rare, pathologic B cell populations.

Frontal fibrosing alopecia: An update on the hypothesis of pathogenesis and treatment

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a relatively new scarring alopecia that is considered a variant of lichen planopilaris (LPP) with no recognized promising treatments. In this study, we tried to clarify the underlying signaling pathways and their roles in the pathogenesis and progression of FFA. Because of several differences in clinical manifestations, response to treatments, and pathological findings, these two conditions could be differentiated from each other. Taking into account the already discussed signaling pathways and involved players such as T cells, mast cells, and sebaceous glands, different possible therapeutic options could be suggested. In addition to treatments supported by clinical evidence, such as 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors, topical calcineurin inhibitors, hydroxychloroquine, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists, and oral retinoid agents, various other treatment strategies and drugs, such as phototherapy, Janus kinase inhibitors, dehydroepiandrosterone, sirolimus, cetirizine, and rituximab, could be suggested to mitigate disease progression. Of course, such lines of treatment need further evaluation in clinical trials.

An aberrant NOTCH2-BCR signaling axis in B cells from patients with chronic GVHD

B-cell receptor (BCR)-activated B cells contribute to pathogenesis in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), a condition manifested by both B-cell autoreactivity and immune deficiency. We hypothesized that constitutive BCR activation precluded functional B-cell maturation in cGVHD. To address this, we examined BCR-NOTCH2 synergy because NOTCH has been shown to increase BCR responsiveness in normal mouse B cells. We conducted ex vivo activation and signaling assays of 30 primary samples from hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients with and without cGVHD. Consistent with a molecular link between pathways, we found that BCR-NOTCH activation significantly increased the proximal BCR adapter protein BLNK. BCR-NOTCH activation also enabled persistent NOTCH2 surface expression, suggesting a positive feedback loop. Specific NOTCH2 blockade eliminated NOTCH-BCR activation and significantly altered NOTCH downstream targets and B-cell maturation/effector molecules. Examination of the molecular underpinnings of this "NOTCH2-BCR axis" in cGVHD revealed imbalanced expression of the transcription factors IRF4 and IRF8, each critical to B-cell differentiation and fate. All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) increased IRF4 expression, restored the IRF4-to-IRF8 ratio, abrogated BCR-NOTCH hyperactivation, and reduced NOTCH2 expression in cGVHD B cells without compromising viability. ATRA-treated cGVHD B cells had elevated TLR9 and PAX5, but not BLIMP1 (a gene-expression pattern associated with mature follicular B cells) and also attained increased cytosine guanine dinucleotide responsiveness. Together, we reveal a mechanistic link between NOTCH2 activation and robust BCR responses to otherwise suboptimal amounts of surrogate antigen. Our findings suggest that peripheral B cells in cGVHD patients can be pharmacologically directed from hyperactivation toward maturity.

TLR/MyD88-mediated Innate Immunity in Intestinal Graft-versus-Host Disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GHVD) is a severe complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The degree of inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract, a major GVHD target organ, correlates with the disease severity. Intestinal inflammation is initiated by epithelial damage caused by pre-conditioning irradiation. In combination with damages caused by donor-derived T cells, such damage disrupts the epithelial barrier and exposes innate immune cells to pathogenic and commensal intestinal bacteria, which release ligands for Toll-like receptors (TLRs). Dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota and signaling through the TLR/myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88) pathways contribute to the development of intestinal GVHD. Understanding the changes in the microbial flora and the roles of TLR signaling in intestinal GVHD will facilitate the development of preventative and therapeutic strategies.

The effects of vitamin A derivative etretinate on the skin of MRL mice

MRL/Mp-lpr/lpr (MRL/lpr) mice are characterized by the disorder of apoptosis due to defects in Fas antigens and autoimmune symptoms including spontaneous lupus erythematosus (LE)-like skin lesions. MRL/Mp- +/+ (MRL/n) mice do not carry the defect of lpr mutation nor do they exhibit skin disorders during the first six months of life. Retinoids are known to inhibit the proliferation of skin fibroblasts, collagen synthesis, modulate immune responses, and apoptosis by Fas ligand upregulation in skin fibroblasts. We examined changes in dermal thickness and appearance of skin disorders in five months old MRL/lpr mice by oral treatment with etretinate, a retinoic acid derivative. Etretinate treated MRL/lpr mice did not have skin lesions or dermatopathological characteristics including an increase in cells infiltrating the dermis. The mean dermal thickness of MRL/lpr and MRL/n mice treated with etretinate decreased significantly and apoptotic cells density in the dermis of MRL/lpr mice with etretinate was significantly higher compared with the control group (P, 0.05) although MRL/lpr mice have a defect within the Fas antigen. We assumed that etretinate reduced dermal thickness, and suppressed the appearance of skin lesions by inducting apoptosis and perhaps regulation of cytokine expression.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease presenting as eosinophilic fasciitis: therapeutic challenges and an additional case

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is one of the main late complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant and a major contributor to the mortality and morbidity in surviving recipients. Skin is the most common involved organ in cGVHD and may mimic a wide spectrum of dermatological conditions in its clinical and histopathologic manifestations. Some of the commonly simulated diseases are scleroderma, morphea, and lichen sclerosus. Chronic GVHD simulating eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is relatively rare, frequently presenting with skin induration, a typical "peau d'orange" appearance, peripheral blood eosinophilia, myalgia, arthralgia, and arthritis leading to joint contractures in severe cases.Diagnosis is based on clinical manifestations and histopathology. Treatment is challenging because most cases are refractory to first-line therapy of glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), and there is no standard second-line therapy.We report a comprehensive review of literature on all reported cases of CGVHD presenting as EF. We also describe an additional interesting case of cGVHD presenting as EF that was resistant to traditional therapy of high-dose glucocorticoids and cyclosporin A, but showed complete resolution of skin manifestations after addition of imatinib.Chronic GVHD presenting as EF is a rare variant of sclerodermatous cGVHD. Diagnosis is difficult, and treatment of cGVHD mimicking EF remains a therapeutic challenge because of obscure pathogenesis and poor response to traditional immunosuppressive medications. Emerging insights into the pathogenesis of cGVHD have resulted in the development of novel targeted therapies, which may improve outcomes and should be attempted in this subset of the disease. Larger studies are warranted to substantiate these preliminary findings.

Phototherapy for the treatment of cutaneous graft versus host disease

Graft versus host disease (GvHD) occurs in half the patients who receive allogenic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and is a major contributor for the morbidity and mortality in these patients. Immunosuppressant therapy cannot suppress all the manifestations of GvHD and new ways of treating the condition are needed. The focus of this review is the treatment of cutaneous GvHD through phototherapy. Of the six acute and ten chronic cutaneous GvHD case series examined the overall trend was that phototherapy was able to reduce the presence of cutaneous lesions of GvHD and, as a consequence, steroid use could be reduced. This provides a positive outlook for phototherapy as a treatment for cutaneous GvHD but there is a need for future studies to include larger numbers of patients in order to obtain more data.

The allure and peril of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: overcoming immune challenges to improve success

Since its inception in the mid-twentieth century, the complication limiting the application and utility of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) to treat patients with hematopoietic cancer is the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Ironically, GVHD is induced by the cells (T lymphocytes) transplanted for the purpose of eliminating the malignancy. Damage ensuing to multiple tissues, e.g., skin, GI, liver, and others including the eye, provides the challenge of regulating systemic and organ-specific GVH responses. Because the immune system is also targeted by GVHD, this both: (a) impairs reconstitution of immunity post-transplant resulting in patient susceptibility to lethal infection and (b) markedly diminishes the individual's capacity to generate anti-cancer immunity--the raison d'etre for undergoing allo-HSCT. We hypothesize that deleting alloreactive T cells ex vivo using a new strategy involving antigen stimulation and alkylation will prevent systemic GVHD thereby providing a platform for the generation of anti-tumor immunity. Relapse also remains the major complication following autologous HSCT (auto-HSCT). While GVHD does not complicate auto-HSCT, its absence removes significant grant anti-tumor responses (GVL) and raises the challenge of generating rapid and effective anti-tumor immunity early post-transplant prior to immune reconstitution. We hypothesize that effective vaccine usage to stimulate tumor-specific T cells followed by their amplification using targeted IL-2 can be effective in both the autologous and allogeneic HSCT setting. Lastly, our findings support the notion that the ocular compartment can be locally targeted to regulate visual complications of GVHD which may involve both alloreactive and self-reactive (i.e., autoimmune) responses.

Graft-versus-host disease: part II. Management of cutaneous graft-versus-host disease

Dermatologists are ideally suited to manage the various cutaneous sequelae of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) outlined in part I of this review. However, the complexity of the patient with GVHD, including comorbidities, potential drug interactions related to polypharmacy, and the lack of evidence-based treatment guidelines, are significant challenges to optimizing patient care. In this section, we will provide an outline for the role of the dermatologist in a multispecialty approach to caring for patients with GVHD.

Treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease: Past, present and future

Chronic GVHD was recognized as a complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation more than 30 years ago, but progress has been slowed by the limited insight into the pathogenesis of the disease and the mechanisms that lead to development of immunological tolerance. Only 6 randomized phase III treatment studies have been reported. Results of retrospective studies and prospective phase II clinical trials suggested overall benefit from treatment with mycophenolate mofetil or thalidomide, but these results were not substantiated by phase III studies of initial systemic treatment for chronic GVHD. A comprehensive review of published reports showed numerous deficiencies in studies of secondary treatment for chronic GVHD. Fewer than 10% of reports documented an effort to minimize patient selection bias, used a consistent treatment regimen, or tested a formal statistical hypothesis that was based on a contemporaneous or historical benchmark. In order to enable valid comparison of the results from different studies, eligibility criteria, definitions of individual organ and overall response, and time of assessment should be standardized. Improved treatments are more likely to emerge if reviewers and journal editors hold authors to higher standards in evaluating manuscripts for publication.

Consensus Conference on Clinical Practice in Chronic GVHD: Second-Line Treatment of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

Steroid refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. Although first-line treatment of cGVHD is based on controlled trials, second-line treatment is almost solely based on phase II trials or retrospective analyses. The consensus conference on clinical practice in cGVHD held in Regensburg aimed to achieve a consensus on the current evidence of treatment options as well as to provide guidelines for daily clinical practice. Treatment modalities are the use of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors as well as immunomodulating modalities (photopheresis, mTOR-inhibitors, thalidomide, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin A analogs, clofazimine), and cytostatic agents (mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, pentostatin). Recent reports showed some efficacy of rituximab, alemtuzumab, and etanercept in selected patients. Moreover, tyrosine kinase inihibitors such as imatinib came into the field because of their ability to interfere with the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-R) pathway involved in fibrosis. An other treatment option is low-dose thoracoabdominal irradiation. Although different treatment options are available, the "trial-and-error system" remains the only way to identify the drug effective in the individual patient, and valid biomarkers are eagerly needed to identify the likelihood of response to a drug in advance. Moreover, the sparse evidence for most treatment entities indicates the urgent need for systematic evaluation of second-line treatment options in cGVHD.

Efficacy of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of sclerodermatous chronic graft-versus-host disease: clinical report

The success of treatment for sclerodermatous chronic graft-versus-host disease (ScGVHD) remains disappointing. The immunomodulatory ability of bone marrow (BM)-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) shows promise in treating GVHD, especially given its previous success in treating patients with acute GVHD (aGVHD). The potential efficacy and safety issues for treating cGVHD, particularly ScGVHD, remain to be clarified, however. Here, we report 4 patients with ScGVHD who received MSCs expanded ex vivo from unrelated donors by intra-BM injection. After MSC infusion, the ratio of helper T lymphocyte (Th) 1 cells to Th2 cells was dramatically reversed, with an increase in Th1 and a decrease in Th2 achieving a new balance. Correspondingly, symptoms gradually improved in all 4 patients. During the course of MSC treatment, the patients' vital signs and laboratory results remained normal. At the time of this report, none of the 4 patients had experienced recurrence of leukemia. Although this study alone cannot guarantee the application of MSCs in ScGVHD, our findings strongly suggest that this treatment is therapeutically practicable, with no detectable side effects. This approach may provide new insight into the clinical treatment of ScGVHD, with the aim of greatly increasing the survival rate in patients with leukemia who undergo allogeneic BM transplantation (BMT).

Therapy with mycophenolate mofetil for refractory acute and chronic GVHD

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of oral mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for treatment of refractory graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In a prospective study of acute GVHD, 9 of 19 patients (47%) had a response and 10 (53%) had no improvement. Survival at 6 and 12 months after the start of MMF was 37% and 16%, respectively. In a retrospective study of acute GVHD, 14 of 29 patients (48%) had a response and 15 (52%) had no improvement. Survival at 6 and 12 months was 55% and 52%, respectively. In a prospective study of chronic GVHD, the cumulative incidence of disease resolution and withdrawal of all systemic immunosuppressive treatment was 9%, 17% and 26% at 12, 24 and 36 months after starting MMF, respectively. Thirteen patients (59%) required additional systemic immunosuppressive treatment for chronic GVHD. Nine of the 42 patients (21%) in the prospective studies discontinued MMF treatment because of toxicity. Area under the curve plasma concentrations of mycophenolic acid appeared to be suboptimal among patients with acute GVHD but not among those with chronic GVHD. MMF can be used effectively for treatment of GVHD.

Imatinib mesylate as salvage therapy for refractory sclerotic chronic graft-versus-host disease

Imatinib is a promising candidate for the treatment of fibrotic diseases. This retrospective study evaluated the use of imatinib for the treatment of refractory sclerotic chronic graft-versus-host disease in 14 patients with different hematologic malignancies. Imatinib was started at a median of 44 months after transplantation (range, 16-119 months after transplantation) and was administered for a median of 5.9 months from time of initiation (range, 2.1-74 months from time of initiation). With a median overall follow-up of 11.6 months from time of initiation (range, 4.1-74 months from time of initiation) of imatinib, 4 patients (29%) had to stop imatinib because of drug intolerance. All other adverse reactions were of mild-to-moderate grade and could be managed symptomatically. Overall, 7 patients responded to imatinib (50%; 95% confidence interval, 24%-76%) with 4 patients improving their Rodman score more than or equal to 90%. In addition, imatinib therapy allowed for a significant reduction of corticosteroid dosage. Despite its limited size, this cohort suggests some beneficial activity of imatinib in sclerotic chronic graft-versus-host disease, warranting further prospective investigations.

Therapy of chronic graft-versus-host disease

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a common complication after hematopoietic-cell transplant and remains the leading cause of late non-relapse mortality. Standard treatment includes a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor and corticosteroids. Prolonged steroid use is required, with more than 50% of patients continuing immunosuppression beyond 2 years. There is no standard second-line therapy for cGVHD. Many agents have been reported in small case series, but the studies are heterogeneous in patient selection and response criteria. There is a need for a systematic study of agents for secondary therapy of cGVHD. In addition, both cGVHD and its treatment are associated with severe complications, including life-threatening infections, reduced quality of life, and psychosocial disturbances. A multidisciplinary approach to evaluating and managing patients with cGVHD is preferred, and disciplined, prospective study of new therapies is essential to make further progress in its understanding and treatment.

The management and outcome of chronic graft-versus-host disease

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a common complication following allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). It is the leading cause of non-relapse mortality in transplant survivors and has a significant impact upon their functional status and quality of life. Despite significant advances being made in the field of HCT over the past 25 years, there has been little change in the incidence, morbidity and mortality of cGVHD. This is partly because of a lack of understanding about the pathogenesis of the disorder but also because a lack of well validated grading systems and outcome measures has hindered clinical research. Strategies for prophylaxis have largely been unsuccessful and may compromise the graft-versus-leukaemia (GVL) effect. Standard primary treatment remains a combination of corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors. There is no standard therapy for those who fail to respond to corticosteroids. Many agents have been studied but there is an urgent need for systematic research to compare the efficacy of different approaches. Infection is the leading cause of death among patients with cGVHD so antimicrobial prophylaxis is mandatory. A multidisciplinary approach to the care of patients with cGVHD is essential to adequately address its effects on both physical and psychological functioning.

Sirolimus as Part of Immunosuppressive Therapy for Refractory Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

Many patients receiving allogeneic stem cells develop chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), which remains as the main cause of morbidity and mortality. Although the first line of therapy is generally with steroids, it is not well known how to manage refractory cases. Those patients are usually treated with alternative experimental agents. Sirolimus (Rapamycin), a new immunosuppressive agent, inhibits signal transduction and cell cycle progression after binding to FKBP12. We report a retrospective analysis with sirolimus in transplant recipients with cGVHD refractory to previous immunosuppressive therapy. Forty-seven patients with refractory or relapsed cGVHD were treated with the combination of sirolimus and calcineurin inhibitors (n = 33), mycophenolate (n = 9), or prednisone (n = 5). Thirty-eight of 47 (81%) patients had clinical responses (complete = 18, partial = 20). The main toxicity was mild renal failure, particularly at the start of therapy. Four patients who presented thrombotic microangiopathy were managed with plasmapheresis and the discontinuation of sirolimus and calcineurin inhibitors. Statistical analysis showed the type of cGVHD onset and presirolimus clinical status as the main variables influencing the response to treatment. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival was 57.4% at 3 years. The current study shows the efficacy and safety of sirolimus in refractory cGVHD patients. Further investigation is warranted to elucidate the role of sirolimus in cGVHD, and find the best combination (sirolimus + calcineurin inhibitors versus others) for therapeutic use.

Sclerodermatous graft-versus-host disease: clinical spectrum and therapeutic challenges

Sclerodermatous graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a rare complication of bone marrow transplantation. While GVHD is often associated with the beneficial graft vs. tumour effect, it also contributes towards significant morbidity and mortality. No reliably effective treatment has yet been established. We present 10 patients with haematological malignancies who underwent an allogeneic stem cell transplant and developed sclerodermatous GVHD. Donor lymphocyte infusion administered for relapse or reducing donor T-cell chimerism was a known trigger for sclerodermatous GVHD in four of the patients. Treatment with immunosuppressants, psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) and extracorporeal photopheresis has been largely unsuccessful in their management. Intensive immunosuppression including the use of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody may have contributed to relapse of leukaemia in one patient 10 years after her transplant. Sclerodermatous GVHD may occur without a preceding lichenoid stage. Clinical heterogeneity is common, although sclerodermatous GVHD has a predilection for the limbs. Treatment options are largely unsatisfactory if conventional immunosuppression fails. PUVA may give some symptomatic benefit and extracorporeal photopheresis seems to be less efficacious than previously published work suggests.

Chronic graft versus host disease of oral mucosa: Review of available therapies

The use of hematopoetic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has greatly expanded in the recent years for many neoplastic and hematological disorders. Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic HSCT and a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Oral mucosal involvement is frequent in cGVHD and contributes significantly to the overall burden of the condition. Oral medicine professionals should be familiar with various treatment options for oral cGVHD. This review discusses treatment modalities available for the management of oral mucosal manifestations of cGVHD. Available evidence for efficacy and safety of various systemic and topical agents, including corticosteroids, calcineurin antagonists, mycophenolate mofetil, and extracorporeal photopheresis, is reviewed.

Dermatologic treatment of cutaneous graft versus host disease

Cutaneous involvement in graft versus host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant can be separated into acute GVHD (aGVHD), lichenoid chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and sclerodermatous cGVHD. It seems clear that these syndromes result from different mechanisms and entail different treatment approaches. Standard treatment of cutaneous aGVHD involves the intensification of immunosuppressive therapy with adequate topical supportive management. In skin-limited disease, phototherapy has shown promising results. In cutaneous cGVHD, the combination of corticosteroids and cyclosporine (ciclosporin) is the recommended therapy, and other immunosuppressants may be added depending on whether lichenoid or sclerodermatous lesions are present. High response rates to phototherapy have been found in lichenoid disease, while sclerodermatous disease responds better to etretinate or extracorporeal photochemotherapy. Localized cutaneous cGVHD may be treated with topical corticosteroids alone. Few reports on the effect of treatments in GVHD clearly describe the cutaneous involvement and the influence of the treatment on the skin. Therefore, dermatologists should be deeply involved in the diagnosis and treatment of GVHD, and good dermatologic grading systems should be developed. Theses changes will increase our knowledge of cutaneous GVHD, and relevant data in the evaluation of the effect of therapy in the disease will be obtained.

Life-threatening graft-vs-host disease

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (SCT) is considered standard therapy for a variety of malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) still represents today a major complication of hematopoietic SCT. Two types of GVHD have traditionally been recognized on the basis of the time of onset following transplantation, distinct pathobiological pathways, and different clinical presentations. The acute form commonly breaks out 2 to 6 weeks after transplantation, affecting up to 60% of patients receiving allogeneic transplants from HLA identical donors. Transfer of immunocompetent donor T cells contained in the graft may undergo alloreactivity against recipient cells because of major or minor histocompatibility antigens disparities between the donor and the immunosuppressed host. Target specificity in acute GVHD involves preferential injury to epithelial surfaces of the skin and mucous membranes, biliary ducts of the liver, and crypts of the intestinal tract. Chronic GVHD affects approximately 30% to 80% of patients surviving 6 months or longer after stem cell transplantation and is the leading cause of nonrelapse deaths occurring more than 2 years after transplantation. Chronic GVHD is a multiorgan syndrome with clinical features suggesting some autoimmune diseases, and possibly both alloreactive and autoreactive T cell clones are involved in its pathophysiology. Although GVHD may convey beneficial graft-versus-leukemia/lymphoma effects, it also entails a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Patients with mild GVHD need only minimal, if any, immunosuppressive treatment, whereas prognosis of patients with extensive disease or resistant to standard immunosuppressive treatment may be dismal. Early recognition of GVHD followed by prompt therapeutic intervention may prevent the progression to higher-grade disease and improve the outcome for patients receiving hematopoietic SCT.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease

Chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) remains today one of the most vexing late complications of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Occurring a minimum of 100 days following stem cell transplantation, approximately 50% of patients will experience some degree of chronic GVHD. Host-reactive lymphocytes of donor origin are the cells responsible for the "alloimmune" attack. The increased use of hematopoietic stem cells collected from the peripheral blood instead of bone marrow and the increasing age of stem cell transplant recipients has led to a higher incidence of chronic GVHD. Chronic GVHD most commonly affects the skin, liver, eyes or the mouth, however multiple other sites may also be affected. Chronic GVHD and the medications used to treat it result in a profoundly immunocompromised state. Death due to severe chronic GVHD is usually a consequence of infectious complications. Standard treatment for severe chronic GVHD is a combination of cyclosporine and prednisone. An alternating day regimen of these two agents prolongs survival and reduces drug-related adverse events. Topical therapy to affected areas is preferred for patients with mild disease. The 10-year survival of patients with mild chronic GVHD is approximately 80%, but is less than 5% for patients affected by severe chronic GVHD.

Chronic graft versus host disease

The ability to cure increasing numbers of individuals for malignant and non-malignant diseases with the use of stem cell transplantation has resulted in a growing number of long-term survivors with unique medical issues. Chronic graft versus host disease (GvHD) continues to be a significant problem in the allogeneic stem cell transplant setting and, as we continue to use alternative stem cell sources and attempt to modulate the immune system to increase an anti-tumour effect, we will probably see rising numbers of patients with this complication. The capacity to treat this problem and improve both the immediate quality of life as well as long-term effects is imperative and requires the ability of haematologists/oncologists to identify chronic GvHD and its multi-organ system presentations. We describe the risk factors for developing chronic GvHD, its presentation and the current treatment options for both initial therapy and secondary treatment.

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody treatment in 6 patients with therapy-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is an important determinant of long-term morbidity and mortality in allogeneic stem cell transplantation patients. Because cGVHD has clinical, histologic, and laboratory findings of autoimmune diseases and anti-B-cell therapy has shown efficacy in autoimmune diseases, we hypothesized that monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody therapy might improve patients with cGVHD. We treated 5 men and 1 woman with therapy-refractory extensive cGVHD with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. Intravenous infusion was given at a weekly dose of 375 mg/m(2) for 4 weeks. In case of incomplete clinical response, additional courses of 4 weeks were given. Five patients responded to treatment with marked clinical, biochemical, and histologic improvement. One patient failed to respond. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody seems to be effective in cGVHD. A controlled trial is mandatory to confirm these results. The outcome of this study suggests a participating role of B cells in the pathogenesis of cGVHD.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease: where do we go from here?

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains a significant cause of late morbidity and mortality following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, patients with chronic GvHD are very heterogeneous, making evaluation and treatment difficult. Corticosteroids remain the most effective primary treatment of this condition. Randomized trials have not confirmed the beneficial effect of additional cyclosporine, even in patients with higher risk features. For patients failing initial therapy, no standard therapy is available. A plethora of drugs have been reported to have activity and promise in this disease. However, the majority of reports are small retrospective studies, with few prospective trials. The marked variability in the reported response rates for many of these novel agents highlights a number of problems in the evaluation and management of chronic GvHD. In addition to the heterogeneity of patients, there are no uniform definitions for treatment failure, prognostic criteria to stratify patients according to risk, or to evaluate response to treatment, which in many cases is largely subjective. The challenge ahead is to develop more uniform criteria for defining many of these important variables, which is likely to lead to the design of better prospective clinical trials to improve the outcome of patients with this condition.

A pediatric case of sclerodermatous chronic graft-versus-host disease

We report a rare case of sclerodermatous chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in a 6-year-old boy that occurred after bone marrow transplantation for his aplastic anemia. The clinical manifestation and histopathologic findings were typical of scleroderma. Although various kinds of treatment have been tried for scleroderma, no established therapy exists. Furthermore, treating this disease is even more difficult in children. In the future, clarification of the pathogenesis of chronic GVHD and establishment of therapy will be necessary.

Pathogenesis and treatment of graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplant

Stem cell transplantation is being used to treat a number of hematologic malignancies as well as hematologic and immune deficiency states. The ages of patients being offered this therapy and the donor marrow sources have been expanded. One persistent problem has been graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). This article reviews the basic biology of GVHD, clinical manifestations of acute and chronic GVHD, prophylaxis and treatment of acute GVHD, and treatment of chronic GVHD.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a vexing and dangerous complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Mild forms of chronic GVHD are often manageable with local or low-dose systemic immunosuppression and do not affect long-term survival. In contrast, more severe forms of chronic GVHD require intensive medical management and adversely affect survival. This report reviews current concepts of the pathogenesis, clinical risk factors, classification systems, organ manifestations, and available treatments for chronic GVHD. It also provides a comprehensive listing of the published clinical trials aimed at prevention and primary treatment of chronic GVHD.

Novel therapeutics for the treatment of graft-versus-host disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD remain the major barriers to successful haematopoietic cell transplantation. The induction of GVHD may be divided into three phases: recipient conditioning, donor T cell activation and effector cells mediating GVHD. This review examines GVHD prevention and treatment using this conceptual model as framework. The various pharmacological agents discussed impact on different phases of the GVHD cascade. For example, keratinocyte growth factor and IL-11 are cytokines that may be useful in disrupting Phase I of the GVHD cascade by blocking gastrointestinal tract damage and lowering serum levels of lipopolysaccharide and TNF-alpha. Cyclosporin, FK506 and sirolimus are some of the main agents that disrupt Phase II (donor T cell activation). Mycophenolate mofetil likely acts on this phase as well. Other novel drugs that affect Phase II are tolerance-induction agents such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 Ig and anti-CD40 ligand, and preliminary results using CTLA-4 Ig in GVHD prevention are encouraging. Two exciting agents that appear to affect only activated lymphocytes are ABX-CBL and visilizumab. Examples of agents that disrupt Phase III are the IL-2 receptor antagonist daclizumab and the anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody infliximab. These anticytokine antibodies have shown promising results in early studies. The most effective approach to GVHD prevention will likely be a combination regimen where the three phases of the GVHD cascade are disrupted. Once GVHD has occurred, all three phases of the cascade are activated. Developments of combination therapy for treatment of both acute and chronic GVHD will likely yield better results than monotherapy. The numerous new treatment modalities presented should improve the outlook for acute and chronic GVHD.

Novel pharmacotherapeutic approaches to prevention and treatment of GVHD

Acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) remain the major barriers to successful hematopoietic cell transplantation. The induction of GVHD may be divided into three phases: recipient conditioning;donor T-cell activation; andeffector cells mediating GVHD. This review examines GVHD prevention and treatment using this conceptual model as framework. The various pharmacological agents discussed impact on different phases of the GVHD cascade. For example, keratinocyte growth factor and interleukin (IL)-11 are cytokines that may be useful in disrupting phase I of the GVHD cascade by blocking gastrointestinal tract damage, and lowering serum levels of lipopolysaccharide and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. Cyclosporin, tacrolimus (FK-506) and sirolimus (rapamycin) are some of the main agents that disrupt phase II (donor T-cell activation). Mycophenolate mofetil and tresperimus probably act on this phase as well. Other novel drugs that affect phase II are tolerance-induction agents such as CTLA-4 and anti-CD40-ligand monoclonal antibodies, and preliminary results using CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody in GVHD prevention are encouraging. Examples of agents that disrupt phase III are the IL-2 receptor antagonist daclizumab and the anti-TNFalpha monoclonal antibody infliximab. These anti-cytokine antibodies have shown promising results in early studies. The most effective approach to GVHD prevention will probably be a combination regimen where the three phases of the GVHD cascade are disrupted. Once GVHD has occurred, all three phases of the cascade are activated. Developments of combination therapy for treatment of both acute and chronic GVHD are likely to yield better results than monotherapy. The numerous new treatment modalities presented should improve the outlook for patients with acute and chronic GVHD.

Stem cell transplantation: supportive care and long-term complications

With increasing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) activity and improvement in outcomes, there are many thousands of HSCT survivors currently being followed by non-transplant clinicians for their healthcare. Several types of late sequelae from HSCT have been noted, and awareness of these complications is important in minimizing late morbidity and mortality. Late effects can include toxicities from the treatment regimen, infections from immunodeficiency, endocrine disturbances, growth impairment, psychosocial adjustment disorders, second malignancies, and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). A variety of risk factors for these complications have been noted. The clinician should be alert to the potential for these health issues. Preventive and treatment strategies can minimize morbidity from these problems and optimize outcomes.

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy for treatment of acute and chronic GVHD in childhood

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (EPC) has recently been proposed for the treatment of adults with either acute or chronic GVHD. However, data on children given this therapy are scarce. A Phase I-II study was carried out on EPC in children experiencing GVHD after allogeneic transplantation of HPCs.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Nine patients with steroid-resistant, grade II-IV acute GVHD and 14 with chronic GVHD, all of whom had been refractory to at least one line of treatment, were enrolled in this study and analyzed. The median age was 10.3 years (range, 5.4-18.1), and the median body weight was 35 kg (range, 17-89).

RESULTS

Seven of the nine patients with acute GVHD showed a response to EPC, whereas the disease progressed in the remaining two children (both with skin, gastrointestinal, and liver GVHD), and they died of grade IV acute GVHD. Among the seven children who responded to EPC, it was possible to completely discontinue immunosuppressive treatment in three. In the 14 children with chronic GVHD, 4 and 5 patients experienced complete and partial response to EPC, respectively, whereas the remaining 5 patients, all with extensive chronic GVHD, had stable disease or disease that progressed during EPC. Among these latter 5 patients, 3 died. In 6 of the 9 patients with chronic GVHD responding to EPC, immunosuppressive therapy was discontinued.

CONCLUSION

EPC is safe, feasible, and effective in children with either acute or chronic GVHD occurring after an allograft.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease: clinical manifestation and therapy

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in long-term survivors of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The immunopathogenesis of chronic GVHD is, in part, TH-2 mediated, resulting in a syndrome of immunodeficiency and an autoimmune disorder. The most important risk factor for chronic GVHD is prior history of acute GVHD and strategies that prevent acute GVHD also decrease the risk of chronic GVHD. Other important risk factors are the use of a non-T cell-depleted graft, and older age of donor and recipient. Whether recipients of peripheral blood stem cells are at increased risk of chronic GVHD remains unsettled. There are no known pharmacologic agents which can specifically prevent development of chronic GVHD. Agents which have efficacy in the treatment of autoimmune disorders have been utilized as therapy for established chronic GVHD and are associated with response rates of 20% to 80%. Most responses are confined to skin, soft tissue, oral mucosa and occasionally liver. Bronchiolitis obliterans responds infrequently to therapy and is associated with a dismal prognosis. Newer, promising therapeutic strategies under investigation include thalidomide, photopheresis therapy, anti-tumor necrosis factor and B cell depletion with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody.

Novel approaches to the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) continues to be the major problem in long-term survivors of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplants and is the principal cause of morbidity and non-relapse mortality. Over the past twenty years, diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of cGvHD have slowly evolved. An effective therapy for cGvHD is designed to prevent complications through targeting the disease mechanisms. None of the present therapies for cGvHD are successful in the majority of patients. Conventional drugs in different combinations can control the disease in approximately 50% of patients. Attempts to improve survival have led to evaluation of several alternative approaches in the treatment of refractory cGvHD with varying degrees of success. Clinical trials are needed to establish the role of these new approaches in the treatment of cGvHD as first line or salvage therapy without causing significant side effects. This review summarises the currently available knowledge on conventional and new treatment approaches for cGvHD.

How I treat chronic graft-versus-host disease

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is now a commonplace procedure. Clinicians who care for patients with hematologic malignancies and aplastic anemia are almost certain to follow up patients after SCT. This review is intended to help clinicians observe patients for probably the most important late complication of SCT, chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). It reviews the pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical manifestations, evaluation, treatment, and supportive care of chronic GVHD.

Management of graft-versus-host disease

The increasing number of allogeneic stem cell transplants, particularly those involving donors other than HLA-identical siblings, has made the management of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) a continuing problem for transplant experts. There have been improvements in the prevention of acute GVHD with cyclosporine- and FK506-based combination therapies, as well as lymphocyte depletion. However, fewer than 50% of patients have durable improvement after initial treatment. FK506 and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are promising salvage therapies in steroid-resistant GVHD, as are the anti-cytokine antibodies and the purine nucleoside analog, pentostatin. The incidence of chronic GVHD has unfortunately not decreased, despite advances in treatment of acute GVHD. Treatment of chronic GVHD involves treatment of the underlying immunologic process and supportive therapies. Initial therapy has tended to be cyclosporine and prednisone. Refractory patients have hope with combination MMF and FK506, etretinate, plaquenil, and nonpharmacologic approaches, such as PUVA. Supportive care is an integral part of chronic GVHD management with emphasis on infection control and symptom control. Death in chronic GVHD is still largely attributable to infection. The progress in therapies for GVHD has been encouraging, but the future of GVHD management lies in a better understanding of its pathogenesis.