Hydroxychloroquine inhibits calcium signals in T cells: a new mechanism to explain its immunomodulatory properties

Thrombosis and Anticoagulation Therapy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune inflammatory disease in which pathogenic autoantibodies and immune complexes are formed and mediate multiple organ and tissue damage. Thrombosis is one of the most common causes of death in patients with SLE. Anticoagulant therapy blocks the vicious cycle between inflammation and thrombosis, which may greatly improve the long-term prognosis of patients with SLE. However, the etiology and pathogenesis of this disease are very complicated and have not yet been fully clarified. Therefore, in the present review, we will highlight the characteristics and mechanisms of thrombosis and focus on the anticoagulant drugs commonly used in clinical practice, thus, providing a theoretical basis for scientific and reasonable anticoagulant therapy in clinical practice.

Hydroxychloroquine Alleviates EAU by Inhibiting Uveitogenic T Cells and Ameliorating Retinal Vascular Endothelial Cells Dysfunction

Purpose

Inflammation triggers the activation of CD4⁺T cells and the breakdown of blood–retinal barrier, thus contributing to the pathology of experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU). We explored the anti-inflammatory effect of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) on EAU and the potential mechanisms active in T cells and retinal vascular endothelial cells (RVECs).

Methods

C57BL/6J mice were immunized with interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein 1-20 (IRBP_1–20) to induce EAU and then treated with the vehicle or HCQ (100 mg/kg/day). On day 7, 14, 21, 30 and 60 after immunization, clinical scores were evaluated. On day 14, histopathological scores were assessed, and retinas, spleens, and lymph nodes were collected for quantitative polymerase chain reaction or flow cytometry analysis. RVEC dysfunction was induced by tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) stimulation. The expression of cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, and lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor-1 (LOX-1)/nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) was measured in RVECs with or without HCQ.

Results

HCQ treatment protected mice from uveitis, evidenced by reduced expression of inflammatory factors, chemokines, and adhesion molecules in the retina. In systemic immune response, HCQ inhibited the activation of naïve CD4⁺T cells and frequencies of T effector cells, and promoted T regulatory cells. HCQ decreased IRBP_1-20–specific T cell responses and proliferation of CD4⁺T cells in vitro. Further studies established that TNF-α induced RVECs to express inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules, whereas HCQ alleviated the alterations via the LOX-1/NF-κB pathways.

Conclusions

HCQ alleviates EAU by regulating the Teff/Treg balance and ameliorating RVECs dysfunction via the LOX-1/NF-κB axis. HCQ may be a promising therapeutic candidate for uveitis.

Segmented intravaginal ring for the combination delivery of hydroxychloroquine and anti-CCR5 siRNA nanoparticles as a potential strategy for preventing HIV infection

Abstract 

Vaginal drug delivery has been shown to be a promising strategy for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. Therapy delivered at the site of infection has many advantages including improved therapeutic efficacy, reduction in systemic toxicity, and reduced potential for development of drug resistance. We developed a “smart” combination intravaginal ring (IVR) that will (1) provide continuous release of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to induce T cell immune quiescence as the first-line of defense and (2) release nanoparticles containing anti-CCR5 siRNA only during sexual intercourse when triggered by the presence of seminal fluid as the second-line of defense. The IVR was capable of releasing HCQ over 25 days with a mean daily release of 31.17 ± 3.06 µg/mL. In the presence of vaginal fluid simulant plus seminal fluid simulant, over 12 × more nanoparticles (5.12 ± 0.9 mg) were released over a 4-h period in comparison to IVR segments that were incubated in the presence of vaginal fluid simulant alone (0.42 ± 0.19 mg). Anti-CCR5 siRNA nanoparticles were able to knockdown 83 ± 5.1% of CCR5 gene expression in vitro in the CD4⁺ T cell line Sup-T1. The IVR system also demonstrated to be non-cytotoxic to VK2/E6E7 vaginal epithelial cells.

Graphical abstract

Mutagenic, Genotoxic and Immunomodulatory effects of Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine: a review to evaluate its potential to use as a prophylactic drug against COVID-19

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Chloroquine (CQ) are two anti-malarial drugs that are now being extensively used by front-line healthcare workers and other common people as a prophylactic drug against the Corona Virus Disease − 19 (COVID-19) in India and as well as in many parts of the world. While only a few in vitro studies have pointed to some efficacy of these drugs as a prophylactic against COVID-19, to date, there are no clinical studies that have established any clinical efficacy of these drugs as a prophylactic. These drugs are commonly used for the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) because of its immunomodulatory effects. Previously, we have evaluated the genetic toxicology of different drugs and chemicals including antimalarial drug CQ both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, we recognize the need to critically review the mutagenic, genotoxic, and immunomodulatory effects of these drugs, to find out whether it is safe to use as a prophylactic drug against COVID-19. Existing literature suggests that CQ can induce mutagenic and genotoxic effects in multiple test systems and both the drugs have immunomodulatory effects. There was no data available to evaluate the mutagenicity and genotoxicity for HCQ. However, during metabolism about 60% of both the drugs remain unchanged and about 40% of the drugs are metabolized into two metabolites, desethylchloroquine and bisdesethylchloroquine by the action of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes in the liver. Both HCQ and CQ are immunomodulatory drugs and have the potential to suppress normal immune system activation. In this review, we have elucidated the mechanism of immunomodulation by both HCQ and CQ and highlighted the mutagenic and genotoxic effects from the available literature. This article is written with the sole objective that the reader will be able to recognize the adverse effects of these drugs when consumed by healthy individuals as a prophylactic. Current literature indicates that healthy individuals should refrain from the use of these drugs until further investigation.