Cytogenetics-based risk prediction of blastic transformation of chronic myeloid leukemia in the era of TKI therapy

Treatment-free remission in CML patients with additional chromosome abnormalities in the Philadelphia-positive clone or variant Philadelphia translocations

Probability of treatment-free remission (TFR) in CML patients with additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACA) in the Philadelphia-positive clone or variant Philadelphia translocations (ACA/Var-Ph group, blue panel), in those with no cytogenetic abnormality other than the classical Philadelphia translocation (c-Ph group, green panel) and in the subgroups of CML patients with high-risk ACA (HR-ACA, yellow panel) and Var-Ph (red panel).

Management of classical Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in Asia: consensus of the Asian Myeloid Working Group

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized clinically by the proliferation of one or more hematopoietic lineage(s). The classical Philadelphia-chromosome (Ph)-negative MPNs include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The Asian Myeloid Working Group (AMWG) comprises representatives from fifteen Asian centers experienced in the management of MPN. This consensus from the AMWG aims to review the current evidence in the risk stratification and treatment of Ph-negative MPN, to identify management gaps for future improvement, and to offer pragmatic approaches for treatment commensurate with different levels of resources, drug availabilities and reimbursement policies in its constituent regions. The management of MPN should be patient-specific and based on accurate diagnostic and prognostic tools. In patients with PV, ET and early/prefibrotic PMF, symptoms and risk stratification will guide the need for early cytoreduction. In younger patients requiring cytoreduction and in those experiencing resistance or intolerance to hydroxyurea, recombinant interferon-α preparations (pegylated interferon-α 2A or ropeginterferon-α 2b) should be considered. In myelofibrosis, continuous risk assessment and symptom burden assessment are essential in guiding treatment selection. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in MF should always be based on accurate risk stratification for disease-risk and post-HSCT outcome. Management of classical Ph-negative MPN entails accurate diagnosis, cytogenetic and molecular evaluation, risk stratification, and treatment strategies that are outcome-oriented (curative, disease modification, improvement of quality-of-life).

European LeukemiaNet laboratory recommendations for the diagnosis and management of chronic myeloid leukemia

From the laboratory perspective, effective management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) requires accurate diagnosis, assessment of prognostic markers, sequential assessment of levels of residual disease and investigation of possible reasons for resistance, relapse or progression. Our scientific and clinical knowledge underpinning these requirements continues to evolve, as do laboratory methods and technologies. The European LeukemiaNet convened an expert panel to critically consider the current status of genetic laboratory approaches to help diagnose and manage CML patients. Our recommendations focus on current best practice and highlight the strengths and pitfalls of commonly used laboratory tests.

Cytogenetics in the management of myeloproliferative neoplasms, mastocytosis and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms: Guidelines from the Group Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH)

Myeloproliferative neoplasms, mastocytosis, myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with hypereosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions, and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms are clonal hematopoietic cancers that, with the exception of certain entities, have an indolent course. In addition to their increasingly important role in the diagnosis of these entities, as shown by the recent classification of hematolymphoid tumors in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization and the International Consensus Classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias, identification of the profile of acquired genetic abnormalities is essential for adapting patient management and early detection of patients at high risk of progression. Alongside molecular abnormalities, cytogenetic abnormalities play an important role in the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of these diseases. Here, we review the recent literature on the impact of chromosomal abnormalities in these different entities and provide updated cytogenetic recommendations and guidelines for their management.

The presence of additional cytogenetic aberrations in chronic myeloid leukemia cells at the time of diagnosis or their appearance on tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy predicts the imatinib treatment failure

Currently used treatment of CML dramatically improved the prognosis of disease. However, additional chromosome aberrations (ACA/Ph+) are still one of the adverse prognostic factors.

OBJECTIVES

evaluation of the impact of ACA/Ph+ appearance during disease outcome on the response to treatment. THE STUDY GROUP: consisted of 203 patients. The median time of follow-up was 72 months. ACA/Ph+ was found in 53 patients.

RESULTS

patients were divided into four groups: standard risk, intermediate, high and very high risk. When ACA/Ph+ presence was documented at diagnosis time the optimal response was observed in 41.2%, 25%, and 0% of pts with intermediate, high and very high risk, respectively. If ACA/Ph+ were detected during imatinib treatment the optimal response was in 4.8% of patients. The risk of blastic transformation for patients with standard risk, intermediate, high and very high risk was 2.7%, 18.4%, 20% and 50%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

the presence of ACA/Ph+ at diagnosis time or their appearance on therapy seems to be clinically relevant not only in terms of the risk of blastic transformation but also in terms of the treatment failure. Gathering patients with various karyotypes and their responses to treatment would allow to set better guidelines and predictions.

Control of Ph+ and additional chromosomal abnormalities in chronic myeloid leukemia by tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a type of blood cancer that is known to affect hematopoietic stem cells. The presence of the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) is the major characteristic of CML. A protein expressed by the Philadelphia chromosome shows elevated tyrosine kinase activity and is considered a tumorigenic factor. The first line of therapy that had been established for CML was "imatinib," a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Various other second- and third-generation TKIs are taken into account in cases of imatinib failure/resistance. With the subsequent rise in the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, optimization in the treatment of CML and amplified total survival were observed throughout TKI dosage. As the disease progresses, additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) have been reported, but their prognostic effect and impact on the response to treatment are still unknown. However, some substantial understandings have been achieved into the disease transformation mechanisms, including the role of somatic mutations, ACAs, and several different genomic mutations that occur during diagnosis or have evolved during treatment. The acquisition of ACAs impedes CML treatment. Due to additional chromosomal lesions, there are greater chances of future disease progression at the time of CML diagnosis beyond the Ph+ translocation. The synchronous appearance of two or more ACAs leads to lower survival and is classified as a poor prognostic group. The key objective of this review is to provide detailed insights into TKIs and their role in controlling Ph+ and ACAs, along with their response, treatment, overall persistence, and survival rate.

Prognosis in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Baseline Factors, Dynamic Risk Assessment and Novel Insights

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has changed the treatment paradigm of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), leading to a dramatic improvement of the outcome of CML patients, who now have a nearly normal life expectancy and, in some selected cases, the possibility of aiming for the more ambitious goal of treatment-free remission (TFR). However, the minority of patients who fail treatment and progress from chronic phase (CP) to accelerated phase (AP) and blast phase (BP) still have a relatively poor prognosis. The identification of predictive elements enabling a prompt recognition of patients at higher risk of progression still remains among the priorities in the field of CML management. Currently, the baseline risk is assessed using simple clinical and hematologic parameters, other than evaluating the presence of additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs), especially those at "high-risk". Beyond the onset, a re-evaluation of the risk status is mandatory, monitoring the response to TKI treatment. Moreover, novel critical insights are emerging into the role of genomic factors, present at diagnosis or evolving on therapy. This review presents the current knowledge regarding prognostic factors in CML and their potential role for an improved risk classification and a subsequent enhancement of therapeutic decisions and disease management.

Advances in molecular evaluation of myeloproliferative neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders with uncontrolled proliferation of one or more hematopoietic cell types, including myeloid, erythroid and megakaryocytic lineages, and minimal defect in maturation. Most MPN are associated with well-defined molecular abnormalities involving genes that encode protein tyrosine kinases that lead to constitutive activation of the downstream signal transduction pathways and confer cells proliferative and survival advantage. Genome-wide sequencing analyses have discovered secondary cooperating mutations that are shared by most of the MPN subtypes as well as other myeloid neoplasms and play a major role in disease progression. Without appropriate management, the natural history of most MPN consists of an initial chronic phase and a terminal blast phase. Molecular aberrations involving protein tyrosine kinases have been used for the diagnosis, classification, detection of minimal/measurable residual disease, and target therapy. We review recent advances in molecular genetic aberrations in MPN with a focus on MPN associated with gene rearrangements or mutations involving tyrosine kinase pathways.

Pathogenesis and management of accelerated and blast phases of chronic myeloid leukemia

The treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been a model for cancer therapy development. Though most patients with CML have a normal quality and duration of life with TKI therapy, some patients progress to accelerated phase (AP) and blast phase (BP), both of which have a relatively poor prognosis. The rates of progression have reduced significantly from over >20% in the pre-TKI era to <5% now, largely due to refinements in CML therapy and response monitoring. Significant insights have been gained into the mechanisms of disease transformation including the role of additional cytogenetic abnormalities, somatic mutations, and other genomic alterations present at diagnosis or evolving on therapy. This knowledge is helping to optimize TKI therapy, improve prognostication and inform the development of novel combination regimens in these patients. While patients with de novo CML-AP have outcomes almost similar to CML in chronic phase (CP), those transformed from previously treated CML-CP should receive second- or third- generation TKIs and be strongly considered for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Similarly, patients with transformed CML-BP have particularly dismal outcomes with a median survival usually less than one year. Combination regimens with a potent TKI such as ponatinib followed by allo-SCT can achieve long-term survival in some transformed BP patients. Regimens including venetoclax in myeloid BP or inotuzumab ozogamicin or blinatumomab in lymphoid BP might lead to deeper and longer responses, facilitating potentially curative allo-SCT for patients with CML-BP once CP is achieved. Newer agents and novel combination therapies are further expanding the therapeutic arsenal in advanced phase CML.

Treatment of blast phase chronic myeloid leukaemia: A rare and challenging entity

Despite the success of BCR-ABL-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib in chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), patients with blast phase (BP)-CML continue to have a dismal outcome with median survival of less than one year from diagnosis. Thus BP-CML remains a critical unmet clinical need in the management of CML. Our understanding of the biology of BP-CML continues to grow; genomic instability leads to acquisition of mutations which drive leukaemic progenitor cells to develop self-renewal properties, resulting in differentiation block and a poor-prognosis acute leukaemia which may be myeloid, lymphoid or bi-phenotypic. Similar advances in therapy are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes; however, this is challenging given the rarity and heterogeneity of BP-CML, leading to difficulty in designing and recruiting to prospective clinical trials. This review will explore the treatment of BP-CML, evaluating the data for TKI therapy alone, combinations with intensive chemotherapy, the role of allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation, the use of novel agents and clinical trials, as well as discussing the most appropriate methods for diagnosing BP and assessing response to therapy, and factors predicting outcome.

Differential prognostic impact of stratified additional chromosome abnormalities on disease progression among Malaysian chronic myeloid leukemia patients undergoing treatment with imatinib mesylate

The emergence of additional chromosome abnormalities (ACAs) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients during treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) regime is generally associated with resistance to treatment and a sign of disease progression to accelerated phase or blast phase. We report the type, frequency, and differential prognostic impact of stratified ACAs with treatment response in 251 Malaysian CML patients undergoing TKI therapy. ACAs were observed in 40 patients (15.9%) of which 7 patients (17.5%) showed ACAs at time of initial diagnosis whereas 33 patients (82.5%) showed ACAs during the course of IM treatment. In order to assess the prognostic significance, we stratified the CML patients with ACAs into four groups, group 1 (+8/+Ph), group 2 (hypodiploidy), group 3 (structural/complex abnormalities); group 4 (high-risk complex abnormalities), and followed up the disease outcome of patients. Group 1 and group 2 relatively showed good prognosis while patients in group 3 and group 4 had progressed or transformed to AP or blast phase with a median survival rate of 12 months after progression. Novel ACAs consisting of rearrangements involving chromosome 11 and chromosome 12 were found to lead to myeloid BP while ACAs involving the deletion of 7q or monosomy 7 led toward a lymphoid blast phase. There was no evidence of group 2 abnormalities (hypodiploidy) contributing to disease progression. Compared to group 1 abnormalities, CML patients with group 3 and group 4 abnormalities showed a higher risk for disease progression. We conclude that the stratification based on individual ACAs has a differential prognostic impact and might be a potential novel risk predictive system to prognosticate and guide the treatment of CML patients at diagnosis and during treatment.

Chromosomal Instability in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Mechanistic Insights and Effects

The most recent two decades have seen tremendous progress in the understanding and treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia, a disease defined by the characteristic Philadelphia chromosome and the ensuing BCR::ABL fusion protein. However, the biology of the disease extends beyond the Philadelphia chromosome into a nebulous arena of chromosomal and genetic instability, which makes it a genetically heterogeneous disease. The BCR::ABL oncoprotein creates a fertile backdrop for oxidative damage to the DNA, along with impairment of genetic surveillance and the favoring of imprecise error-prone DNA repair pathways. These factors lead to growing chromosomal instability, manifested as additional chromosomal abnormalities along with other genetic aberrations. This worsens with disease progression to accelerated and blast phase, and modulates responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Treatment options that target the genetic aberrations that mitigate chromosome instability might be a potential area for research in patients with advanced phase CML.

[Analysis of clinical features and prognosis of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia harboring additional chromosomal abnormalities in Ph-positive cells]

Objective: To investigate the effects of additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACA) in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph(+)) cells on biological characteristics, therapy efficacy, and prognosis of patients with primary chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) -chronic phase (CP) and those who developed CML-accelerated phase/blast phase (AP/BP) during therapy. Methods: The clinical data of 410 patients with Ph(+) CML, including 348 patients with primary CML-CP and 62 patients who progressed to CML-AP/BP during treatment, who were admitted to Henan People's Hospital from January 2013 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed to categorize into high-risk, non-high-risk, and non-ACA groups according to the ELN2020 criteria. The effects of high- and non-high-risk ACA on biological characteristics, therapy efficacy, and prognosis were compared. Results: ①Among the 348 patients with primary CML-CP, 20 patients (5.75% ) had ACA, including 3 and 17 patients with high-risk and non-high-risk ACA, respectively, whereas the remaining 328 patients did not have ACA. There were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics between those with and without ACA (P>0.05 for all) . The rates of complete hematological response, complete cytogenetic response, major molecular remission, and 5-year overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between the non-high-risk ACA and non-ACA groups (P>0.05 for all) ; however, the 5-year progression-free survival of the non-high-risk ACA group (42.0% ) was significantly lower than that of the non-ACA group (74.5% ) (χ(2)=4.766, P=0.029) .②Of the 62 patients who progressed to CML-AP/BP during treatment, 41 patients (66.13% ) had ACA, including 28 and 13 patients with high-risk and non-high-risk ACA, respectively, whereas the remaining 21 patients did not have ACA. Platelet counts of the high-risk ACA group (42.5×10(9)/L) were lower than those of the non-high-risk (141×10(9)/L) and non-ACA groups (109×10(9)/L) (χ(2)=4.968, P=0.083) . There was no significant difference in the incidence of point mutations in ABL kinase among the three groups (P=0.652) . The complete cytogenetic response of the high-risk ACA group (5.3% ) was significantly lower than that of the non-ACA group (46.7% ) (χ(2)=5.851, P=0.016) . The 5-year OS of the high-risk ACA group was lower than that of the non-ACA group (46.2% vs 77.8% , χ(2)=3.878, P=0.049) . Subgroup analysis revealed that the 5-year OS rate of the high-risk group Ⅱ, which included -7/7q-, i (17q) , and complex karyotype comprising ≥2 high-risk ACA, was significantly lower than that of the non-ACA group (28.6% vs 77.8% , χ(2)=8.035, P=0.005) whereas the 5-year OS rate was not significantly different between high-risk group Ⅰ, which included +8,+Ph, and complex ACA with +8/+Ph, and the non-ACA group (54.5% vs 77.8% , χ(2) =1.514, P=0.219) . Conclusion: Due to different disease stages and ACA/Ph(+) types, treatment response and prognosis vary among patients with CML harboring ACA/Ph(+). The emergence of high-risk ACA during therapy suggests worse therapy efficacy and prognosis. Strict and standardized cytogenetic monitoring is critical for early detection, precise diagnosis, and treatment of these patients.

Understanding and Monitoring Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Blast Crisis: How to Better Manage Patients

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is triggered primarily by the t(9;22) (q34.13; q11.23) translocation. This reciprocal chromosomal translocation leads to the formation of the BCR-ABL fusion gene. Patients in the chronic phase (CP) experience a good curative effect with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, cases are treatment refractory, with a dismal prognosis, when the disease has progressed to the accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP). Until now, few reports have provided a comprehensive description of the mechanisms involved at different molecular levels. Indeed, the underlying pathogenesis of CML evolution comprises genetic aberrations, chromosomal translocations (except for the Philadelphia chromosome), telomere biology, and epigenetic anomalies. Herein, we provide knowledge of the biology responsible for blast transformation of CML at several levels, such as genetics, telomere biology, and epigenetic anomalies. Because of the limited treatment options available and poor outcomes, only the therapeutic response is monitored regularly, which involves BCR-ABL transcript level assessment and immunologic surveillance, with the optimal treatment strategy for patients in CP adapted to evaluate disease recurrence or progression. Overall, selecting optimal treatment endpoints to predict survival and successful TFR improves the quality of life of patients. Thus, identifying risk factors and developing risk-adapted therapeutic options may contribute to a better outcome for advanced-phase patients.

Additional chromosomal abnormalities at chronic myeloid leukemia diagnosis predict an increased risk of progression

At diagnosis of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), there are conflicting data as to whether additional cytogenetic abnormalities (ACAs) beyond a standard Philadelphia (Ph) translocation confer a higher risk of subsequent disease progression. In the United Kingdom SPIRIT2 trial comparing imatinib 400 mg daily with dasatinib 100 mg daily, diagnostic karyotypes were available in 763 of the 814 patients recruited. Of these, 27 had ACAs in either/both the original 4 major route group (trisomy 8 or 19, iso17q or a second Ph) or the 5 additional lesions recently described (trisomy 21, 3q26.2, monosomy 7/7q-, 11q23, and complex karyotypes), and their progression rate was significantly higher (22.2%) than in patients without one of these ACAs (2.2%; P < .001). Patients with ACAs had worse progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 5.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.59-10.50; P < .001) and freedom from progression (FFP; HR, 12.66; 95% CI, 4.95-32.37; P < .001) compared with patients without ACAs. No association was seen between the Sokal or European Treatment and Outcome Study long-term survival (ELTS) scores and the presence of ACAs. Univariate analysis showed that higher Sokal and ELTS scores and the presence of ACAs were associated with poorer PFS, though only ACAs and high-risk ELTS scores were associated with poorer FFP. Multivariable models identified both the Sokal/ELTS score and ACAs as significant independent factors for PFS but only ELTS score and ACAs as significant independent factors for FFP. The data support the view that certain ACAs are predictive of disease progression independently of Sokal or ELTS scores.

Genetic Heterogeneity in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: How Clonal Hematopoiesis and Clonal Evolution May Influence Prognosis, Treatment Outcome, and Risk of Cardiovascular Events

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has long been considered as a model of cancer caused by a single-driver genetic lesion (BCR/ABL1 rearrangement) that codes for a unique, gain-of-function, deregulated protein. However, in the last decade, high-throughput sequencing technologies have shed light on a more complex genetic landscape, in which additional mutations may be found in different disease phases, including diagnosis. These genetic lesions may even precede the occurrence of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome, pointing to an antecedent premalignant state of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) at least in some patients. Preliminary data support the hypothesis that the most frequent CH-associated mutations (DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1) may be associated with a risk of vascular event, but a definitive answer for this topic is still lacking. Moreover, several recent studies have linked a much more complex genetic background in chronic-phase CML, including signs of clonal evolution over time, with depth of treatment responses or with patient survival. In the present review, we address the current state of the art on age-related CH, its association with cardiovascular risk, and its pathophysiology; review the current knowledge on CH that precedes the acquisition of the Ph chromosome in CML patients; and discuss available evidence on the prognostic and predictive value of additional mutations in chronic-phase CML, either as a sign of clonal dynamics under treatment or as markers of an antecedent CH.

Clonal evolution of AML1-ETO coexisting with BCR-ABL and additional chromosome abnormalities in a blastic transformation of chronic myeloid leukemia

Blast crisis develops in a minority of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia even in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Reports suggest that we know little about the mechanism of BCR-ABL and AML1-ETO co-expression in blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia, and that other chromosomal abnormalities also coexist. Here, we document an unusual and interesting case of a 51-year-old female diagnosed in the chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia. After undergoing TKI treatment for 3 months, her bone marrow aspirates in the chronic phase had transformed to blast crisis. Molecular genetic testing indicated she was positive for p210 form of BCR-ABL (copy number decreased from 108.91% to 56.96%) and AML1-ETO fusion (copy number, 5.65%) genes and had additional chromosomal abnormalities of t(8; 21)(q22; q22)/t(9; 22)(q34; q11), t(2; 5)(p24; q13) and an additional +8 chromosome.

Rare monosomy 7 and deletion 7p at diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia in accelerated phase

Clonal cytogenic evolution with the development of additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is a marker for disease progression and is known to impact therapy and survival. The presence of ACAs has been shown to affect the responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with newly diagnosed CML in accelerated phase (CML-AP). We report a rare case of a CML patient who presented in CML-AP and was found to have multiple ACAs including monosomy 7, deletion 7p, trisomy 8, and an extra Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) in separate Ph-positive cell line, respectively. Six months after combined chemotherapy with TKI, the patient achieved a major cytogenetic response with disappearance of monosomy 7/deletion 7p with no major molecular response.

The New ELN Recommendations for Treating CML

After normal survival has been achieved in most patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a new goal for treating CML is survival at good quality of life, with treatment discontinuation in sustained deep molecular response (DMR; MR4 or deeper) and treatment-free remission (TFR). Four tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved for first-line therapy: imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib. Unexpectedly, the outcome of long-term randomized trials has shown that faster response as achieved by higher doses of imatinib, imatinib in combination, or second-generation (2G)-TKIs, does not translate into a survival advantage. Serious and frequent, and in part cumulative long-term toxicities, have led to a reevaluation of the role of 2G-TKIs in first-line therapy. Generic imatinib is the current most cost-effective first-line therapy in the chronic phase. A change of treatment is recommended when intolerance cannot be ameliorated or molecular milestones are not reached. Patient comorbidities and contraindications of all TKIs must be considered. Risk profile at diagnosis should be assessed with the EUTOS score for long-term survival (ELTS). Monitoring of response is by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Cytogenetics is still required in the case of atypical translocations, atypical transcripts, and additional chromosomal aberrations. TKIs are contraindicated during pregnancy. Since the majority of patients are at risk of lifelong exposure to TKIs, amelioration of chronic low-grade side effects is important.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in 2020

New insights have emerged from maturing long-term academic and commercial clinical trials regarding optimum management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Velocity of response has unexpectedly proved less important than hitherto thought, does not predict survival, and is of unclear relevance for treatment-free remission (TFR). Serious and cumulative toxicity has been observed with tyrosine kinase inhibitors that had been expected to replace imatinib. Generic imatinib has become cost-effective first-line treatment in chronic phase despite chronic low-grade side-effects in many patients. Earlier recognition of end-phase by genetic assessment might improve prospects for blast crisis (BC). TFR has become an important new treatment goal of CML. To reflect this new situation ELN has recently revised and updated its recommendations for treating CML. After a brief review of 175 years of CML history this review will focus on recent developments and on current evidence for treating CML in 2020.

High-risk additional chromosomal abnormalities at low blast counts herald death by CML

Blast crisis is one of the remaining challenges in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Whether additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) enable an earlier recognition of imminent blastic proliferation and a timelier change of treatment is unknown. One thousand five hundred and ten imatinib-treated patients with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) CML randomized in CML-study IV were analyzed for ACA/Ph+ and blast increase. By impact on survival, ACAs were grouped into high risk (+8, +Ph, i(17q), +17, +19, +21, 3q26.2, 11q23, -7/7q abnormalities; complex) and low risk (all other). The presence of high- and low-risk ACAs was linked to six cohorts with different blast levels (1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30%) in a Cox model. One hundred and twenty-three patients displayed ACA/Ph+ (8.1%), 91 were high risk. At low blast levels (1-15%), high-risk ACA showed an increased hazard to die compared to no ACA (ratios: 3.65 in blood; 6.12 in marrow) in contrast to low-risk ACA. No effect was observed at blast levels of 20-30%. Sixty-three patients with high-risk ACA (69%) died (n = 37) or were alive after progression or progression-related transplantation (n = 26). High-risk ACA at low blast counts identify end-phase CML earlier than current diagnostic systems. Mortality was lower with earlier treatment. Cytogenetic monitoring is indicated when signs of progression surface or response to therapy is unsatisfactory.

European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia

The therapeutic landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has profoundly changed over the past 7 years. Most patients with chronic phase (CP) now have a normal life expectancy. Another goal is achieving a stable deep molecular response (DMR) and discontinuing medication for treatment-free remission (TFR). The European LeukemiaNet convened an expert panel to critically evaluate and update the evidence to achieve these goals since its previous recommendations. First-line treatment is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI; imatinib brand or generic, dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib are available first-line). Generic imatinib is the cost-effective initial treatment in CP. Various contraindications and side-effects of all TKIs should be considered. Patient risk status at diagnosis should be assessed with the new EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS)-score. Monitoring of response should be done by quantitative polymerase chain reaction whenever possible. A change of treatment is recommended when intolerance cannot be ameliorated or when molecular milestones are not reached. Greater than 10% BCR-ABL1 at 3 months indicates treatment failure when confirmed. Allogeneic transplantation continues to be a therapeutic option particularly for advanced phase CML. TKI treatment should be withheld during pregnancy. Treatment discontinuation may be considered in patients with durable DMR with the goal of achieving TFR.

Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Advanced Phase

Management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in advanced phases remains a challenge also in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment. Cytogenetic clonal evolution and development of resistant mutations represent crucial events that limit the benefit of subsequent therapies in these patients. CML is diagnosed in accelerated (AP) or blast phase (BP) in <5% of patients, and the availability of effective treatments for chronic phase (CP) has dramatically reduced progressions on therapy. Due to smaller number of patients, few randomized studies are available in this setting and evidences are limited. Nevertheless, three main scenarios may be drawn: (a) patients diagnosed in AP are at higher risk of failure as compared to CP patients, but if they achieve optimal responses with frontline TKI treatment their outcome may be similarly favorable; (b) patients diagnosed in BP may be treated with TKI alone or with TKI together with conventional chemotherapy regimens, and subsequent transplant decisions should rely on kinetics of response and individual transplant risk; (c) patients in CP progressing under TKI treatment represent the most challenging population and they should be treated with alternative TKI according to the mutational profile, optional chemotherapy in BP patients, and transplant should be considered in suitable cases after return to second CP. Due to lack of validated and reliable markers to predict blast crisis and the still unsatisfactory results of treatments in this setting, prevention of progression by careful selection of frontline treatment in CP and early treatment intensification in non-optimal responders remains the main goal. Personalized evaluation of response kinetics could help in identifying patients at risk for progression.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Beyond BCR-ABL1

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we emphasize up-to-date practical cytogenetic and molecular aspects of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and summarize current knowledge on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance and treatment response monitoring of CML.

RECENT FINDINGS

The introduction of TKIs has changed the natural course of CML and markedly improved patient survival. Over the past decades, many research efforts were devoted to elucidating the leukemogenic mechanisms of BCR-ABL1 and developing novel TKIs. More recent studies have attempted to answer new questions that have emerged in the TKI era, such as the cytogenetic and molecular bases of treatment failure and disease progression, the clinical impact of genetic aberrations in Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive and Ph-negative cells, and the biological significance of Ph secondarily acquired during therapy of other hematological neoplasms. Recent progresses in the understanding of the cytogenetic and molecular mechanisms underlying therapeutic failure and disease progression have improved the risk stratification of CML and will be helpful in the design of novel therapeutic strategies.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia, a still unsolved problem: pitfalls and new therapeutic possibilities

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal myeloproliferative disorder of hematopoietic stem cells. At the molecular level, the disorder results from t(9;22)(q34;q11) reciprocal translocation between chromosomes, which leads to the formation of an oncogenic BCR–ABL gene fusion. Instead of progress in the understanding of the molecular etiology of CML and the development of novel therapeutic strategies, clinicians still face many challenges in the effective treatment of patients. In this review, we discuss the pathways of diagnosis and treatment of patients, as well as the problems appearing in the course of disease development. We also briefly refer to several aspects regarding the current knowledge on the molecular basis of CML and new potential therapeutic targets.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following Treatment for Primary Neoplasms or Other Medical Conditions

OBJECTIVES

Therapy-related chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been reported, but its clinical presentation and pathologic features have not yet been well characterized.

METHODS

Twenty-one cases of CML following treatment for primary diseases were collected and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The clinical presentation, pathologic features, and cytogenetic profile were similar to de novo CML. In particular, those with an isolated Philadelphia chromosome constituted 88.9% of our cases, and additional aberrations characteristic of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS) were not identified in this study. The patients responded to imatinib/derivatives and survived with limited follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy-related CML has a clinical presentation, pathologic features, and cytogenetic profile akin to de novo CML. Absence of additional significant aberrations seems to suggest a pathogenesis different from therapy-related AML/MDS. Therapy-related CML exhibits a robust therapeutic response to imatinib/derivatives and favorable clinical outcomes similar to de novo CML.