High risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with a persistent lupus anticoagulant

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Twin Pregnancies with Antiphospholipid Antibodies Positivity: A Retrospective Study

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of twin pregnancies with antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) positivity, a rare and complex clinical condition that remains a huge challenge for management.

Methods

This study enrolled twin-pregnant women at our hospital between January 2018 and August 2023. Women with and without aPL positivity were selected using propensity score matching (PSM). Clinical features and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups in the PSM cohort. To analyze the effect of aPL positivity on pregnancy outcomes, multivariate logistic models were used to obtain adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Among the 773 women with twin pregnancies, aPL positivity was found in 26 women (3.36%). In the PSM cohort, there were 24 twin-pregnant women with positive aPL, and 48 women without aPL were selected as controls. Twin-pregnant women with aPL positivity had a higher proportion of abortion (8.33% vs 0, P = 0.043), preterm birth < 34 weeks (33.33% vs 8.33%, P = 0.007) and very low birthweight (<1500 g) (20.83% vs 4.17%, P = 0.016) than the control group. In addition, stillbirth of one fetus was observed in one twin-pregnant woman with positive aPL. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that twin pregnancy with aPL positivity was associated with preterm birth < 34 weeks (aOR = 2.76, 95% CI: 0.83-4.70, P = 0.005), very low birthweight (<1500 g) (OR = 2.40, 95% CI: 0.18-4.67, P = 0.034) and small for gestational age (SGA) (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.22-3.10, P =0.024).

Conclusion

Twin pregnancies with aPL positivity were correlated with obstetric complications, including abortion, preterm birth < 34 weeks and very low birthweight (<1500 g). The detection of aPL may be of clinical significance for women with twin pregnancies and should be considered in future studies.

Added value of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies in the workup of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies

BACKGROUND

The added value of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) in the diagnostic workup of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is unclear. Currently, diagnosis of thrombotic APS (TAPS) and obstetric APS (OAPS) requires persistent presence of lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin (aCL) immunoglobulin (Ig) G/IgM, or anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) IgG/IgM antibodies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of aPS/PT IgG and IgM in OAPS.

METHODS

aPS/PT IgG/IgM, aCL IgG/IgM, aβ2GPI IgG/IgM, and LAC were determined in 653 patients (OAPS, TAPS, and controls). In-house aPS/PT cut-off values were calculated, titers and prevalence were compared between OAPS, TAPS, and controls and type of pregnancy morbidity. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were calculated.

RESULTS

In OAPS, aPS/PT IgG and IgM showed an OR of 4.32 (95% CI, 2.54-7.36) and 3.37 (95% CI, 1.93-5.89), respectively, but the association was not independent of LAC. Prevalence and titers of aPS/PT IgG and IgM were lower in OAPS than in patients with TAPS. aPS/PT were more prevalent and showed higher titers in patients with late pregnancy loss than in patients with early pregnancy loss with a positivity of 86.4% and 39.3%, respectively. Higher aPS/PT titers did not increase the likelihood of having OAPS.

CONCLUSION

The added value of aPS/PT testing in the current diagnostic workup of OAPS seems limited compared with LAC, aCL, and aβ2GPI. aPS/PT might be useful in specific subsets of patients with OAPS. However, future multicentric studies are needed to elucidate the risk of less frequent and most severe obstetrical manifestations.

Association of lupus anticoagulants with risk factors for obstetric complications and adverse gestational outcome

BACKGROUND

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) may be a cause of poor obstetric outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To search the association of LA with risk factors for obstetric complications and adverse gestational outcome.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort was consisted of 2 groups of pregnancies with poor obstetric history; 1) LA (+) gestations (Study Group, n= 20) and 2) LA (-) gestations (Control Group, 78). All patients were admitted to a special antenatal care program and were examined in terms of risk factors for thrombotic events, placenta-related obstetric complications, and poor gestational outcomes. Patients were administered low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), low-dose salicylic acid and low-dose corticosteroid (if necessary) within the framework of a prophylaxis protocol in addition to their already existing medications.

RESULTS

We have shown that adverse gestational outcome was 1.7-fold more frequent in LA (+) pregnancies with poor obstetric history (p= 0.039, 70% vs. 41%). Higher rates of autoimmune diseases and hereditary thrombophilia were observed among LA (+) patients compared to LA (-) gestations (35% vs. 10.3%, p< 0.012 and 55% vs. 19.2%, p< 0.003, respectively). To identify the effectiveness of low-dose LMWH prophylaxis protocol, we compared gestational outcomes and demonstrated that the miscarriage rate was significantly decreased to half in current pregnancies compared to the previous gestations (73.6% vs. 35%, p= 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Autoimmune diseases and hereditary thrombophilia are more frequent in LA (+) pregnancies, and these women are prone to obstetric problems. Low-dose LMWH and salicylic acid prophylaxis are critical in the management of LA (+) pregnant women.

Interaction between endothelial cell-derived extracellular vesicles and monocytes: A potential link between vascular thrombosis and pregnancy-related morbidity in antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease driven by a wide group of autoantibodies primarily directed against phospholipid-binding proteins (antiphospholipid antibodies). APS is defined by two main kinds of clinical manifestations: vascular thrombosis and pregnancy-related morbidity. In recent years, in vitro and in vivo assays, as well as the study of large groups of patients with APS, have led some authors to suggest that obstetric and vascular manifestations of the disease are probably the result of different pathogenic mechanisms. According to this hypothesis, the disease could be differentiated into two parallel entities: Vascular APS and obstetric APS. Thus, vascular APS is understood as an acquired thrombophilia in which a generalised phenomenon of endothelial activation and dysfunction (coupled with a triggering factor) causes thrombosis at any location. In contrast, obstetric APS seems to be due to an inflammatory phenomenon accompanied by trophoblast cell dysfunction. The recent approach to APS raises new issues; for instance, the mechanisms by which a single set of autoantibodies can lead to two different clinical entities are unclear. This review will address the monocyte, a cell with well-known roles in haemostasis and pregnancy, as a potential participant in vascular thrombosis and pregnancy-related morbidity in APS. We will discuss how in a steady state the monocyte-endothelial interaction occurs via extracellular vesicles (EVs), and how antiphospholipid antibodies, by inducing endothelial activation and dysfunction, may disturb this interaction to promote the release of monocyte-targeted procoagulant and inflammatory messages.

Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Pregnancy: Maternal and Neonatal Implications

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL Abs) have long been associated with the occurrence of certain specific pregnancy morbidities, affecting both mother and fetus. Antithrombotic-based prophylactic regimens are the standard of care. Their intensity is modulated by the thrombotic history and has greatly improved the prognosis related to spontaneous morbidity. Observational studies show that this treatment is still associated with the persistence of excess of late-pregnancy placental diseases, calling for new or complementary developments, yet to be validated. Rigorous prospective multicentric validation of clinical and laboratory parameters capable of identifying those women and fetuses at a risk of pejorative evolution, thus early prognosis, is a priority issue. These will make it possible to develop customized treatments and test them. Furthermore, there are still concerns, particularly neurodevelopmental ones, about children born to aPL Ab-positive mothers, and clarification based on regular, more systematic evaluations is required. Even after pregnancy, women with a pure obstetrical antiphospholipid syndrome are at a greater risk of venous and arterial thrombosis over time, and prevention needs to be improved. These women also appear to develop more psychiatric and mood disorders. Central nervous system imaging using high-resolution techniques has shown subtle impairments in the white matter, associated with the most pathogenic aPL Abs and the clinical significance of this is under investigation. These mothers also seem to develop an excess of cancers. The systemic impact of aPL Abs is gradually being suspected, although this requires further evidence, and prevention should be envisaged.

Determination of Thrombogenicity Levels of Various Antiphospholipid Antibodies by a Modified Thrombin Generation Assay in Patients with Suspected Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a hypercoagulable state accompanied by the presence of heterogeneous antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), which nonspecifically affect hemostasis by the presence of lupus anticoagulans (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), antibodies against β2-glycoprotein-I (anti-β2GPI), but also non-criteria antibodies such as antibodies against β2-glycoprotein-I domain I (anti-DI), anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (anti-PS/PT), anti-annexin V, and many others. The main target of the antibodies is the activated protein C (APC) system, the elimination of which can manifest itself as a thrombotic complication. The aim of this study was to determine the thrombogenicity of antibodies using a modified protein C-activated thrombin generation assay (TGA) on a group of 175 samples suspected of APS. TGA was measured with/without APC and the ratio of both measurements was evaluated (as for APC resistance), where a cut-off was calculated ≤4.5 (90th percentile) using 21 patients with heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation (FV Leiden heterozygous). Our study demonstrates the well-known fact that multiple positivity of different aPLs is a more severe risk for thrombosis than single positivity. Of the single antibody positivity, LA antibodies are the most serious (p value < 0.01), followed by aCL and their subgroup anti-DI (p value < 0.05). Non-criteria antibodies anti-annexin V and anti-PT/PS has a similar frequency occurrence of thrombogenicity as LA antibodies but without statistical significance or anti-β2GPI1 positivity. The modified TGA test can help us identify patients in all groups who are also at risk for recurrent thrombotic and pregnancy complications; thus, long-term prophylactic treatment is appropriate. For this reason, it is proving increasingly beneficial to include the determination antibodies in combination with modified TGA test.

Association between interferon-I producing plasmacytoid dendritic cells and thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome

Background: Thrombotic risk in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is conferred by the association of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies (first hit) with additional pro-coagulant stimulus (second hit), such as inflammation. Among inflammatory responses, the production of large amounts of interferon (IFN)-I by plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) is at the basis of the pathophysiology of systemic autoimmune disorders, which raises the hypothesis that this mechanism could also be associated with vascular manifestations of APS. Purpose: Here, we determined the association of pDCs and IFN-I production with thrombotic APS. Research design: Patients with thrombotic primary (t-PAPS) and secondary APS (t-SAPS), asymptomatic aPL carriers and individuals without thrombosis (controls) were included. Data collection and analysis: Circulating pDCs and IFN-α intracellular expression (in the presence or not of oligodeoxynucleotides (CP) stimulus) were quantified by flow cytometry. The expression of five IFN-I inducing genes: ISG15, OASL, Ly6E, MX1, and OAS1 in mononuclear cells was determined by qPCR. Between-group differences were evaluated using chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: A total of 50 patients with t-PAPS, 50 patients with t-SAPS, 20 aPL carriers, and 50 individuals without thrombosis (controls) were included. Intracellular expression of IFN-α was increased after CPG stimulation in both t-SAPS (1.56%; IQR 1.07-2.02) and t-PAPS (0.96%; IQR 0.55-1.24), when compared to aPL carriers (0.71%; IQR 0.42-0.93) and controls (0.48%; IQR 0.24-0.78; p < .0001). ISG15, OASL, Ly6E, MX1, and OAS1 mRNA expressions were higher in t-SAPS (but not in t-PAPS) than in aPL carriers and controls. The expression of proteins and mRNA related to IFN-I response was similar between the triple aPL-positive profile and other aPL profiles. Conclusion: Our results indicate an association of IFN-I response and t-APS. Since IFN-I expression was not increased in aPL carriers or associated with a higher-risk aPL profile, this mechanism does not appear to be related to the presence of aPL alone. IFN-I response could possibly constitute a complementary mechanism for triggering clinical manifestations in APS.

Reference intervals for coagulation parameters in non-pregnant and pregnant women

Established reference intervals (RIs) of coagulation parameters generally based on the general population are not applicable to specific women. In order to accurately evaluate the coagulation status of non-pregnant women and pregnant women, specific RIs should be established. Our study recruited 465 non-pregnant women and 1972 pregnant women aged 20–45 years. Eight tests including antithrombin (AT), protein C (PC), free protein S (fPS), lupus anticoagulant (LA), D-dimer, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products (FDP), coagulation factor VII (FVII), and factor VIII (FVIII) were performed on ACL TOP automated coagulation instrument. The RIs for these tests were established in non-pregnant and pregnant women at different gestational weeks. Compared to the non-pregnant group, the medians of AT and fPS were lower, while the medians of PC, LA normalized ratio, D-dimer, FDP, FVII, and FVIII were higher. During pregnancy, AT and fPS activity showed a decreasing trend, with the increase of gestational age. PC activity, LA normalized ratio, D-dimer concentrations, FDP concentrations, FVII, and FVIII activity presented an increasing trend, with the increase of gestational age. The non-pregnant women-specific RIs and the gestational age-specific RIs of AT, PC, fPS, LA normalized ratio, D-dimer, FDP, FVII, and FVIII needed to be established for accurate clinical diagnoses.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose aspirin combined with low-molecular-weight heparin in treatment of preeclampsia: a meta-analysis and systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The role of low-dose aspirin combined with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in the treatment of preeclampsia (PE) remains unclear. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of low-dose aspirin combined with LMWH in PE treatment, to provide evidence for clinical PE management.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We searched PubMed and other databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects and safety of low-dose aspirin and LMWH in the treatment of PE up to January 31, 2021. Two researchers strictly followed the inclusion and exclusion criteria to independently conduct the literature screening, data extraction and quality evaluation. We used RevMan 5.3 statistical software for synthesized analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 8 RCTs involving 861 patients were included. The synthesized outcome indicated that the differences in systolic blood pressure (MD = -10.61, 95% CI: -13.19 - -8.02), diastolic blood pressure (MD = -9.24, 95% CI: -14.49- -4.00), 24-hour urinary protein (MD = -2.24, 95% CI: -3.97- -0.50), prothrombin time (MD = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.53-2.32), activated partial thromboplastin time (MD = 2.91, 95% CI: 2.06-3.75), FIB (MD = -1.24, 95% CI: -1.32- -1.15), and adverse perinatal outcomes (MD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.20-0.85) between the two groups were statistically significant (all p < 0.05), while the difference in the adverse reactions of pregnant women (MD = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.18-1.10) between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). No publication bias was detected in all the synthesized outcomes (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose aspirin combined with LMWH treatment of PE may be advantageous to improve blood pressure, 24-hour proteinuria and coagulation function, and it may reduce the adverse reactions in pregnant women without increasing adverse perinatal outcomes.

Single or triple positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies in "carriers" or symptomatic patients: Untangling the knot

BACKGROUND

Although the triple positivity of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) is important for classifying high-risk patients, interpretation of aPL positivity, namely the lupus anticoagulant (LA), anti-cardiolipin (aCL), and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I autoantibodies (aB2GPI) remains challenging for thrombotic risk stratification.

OBJECTIVE

To compare biological and clinical data between triple aPL- and single aCL-positive patients.

METHODS

Of the 6500 patients assayed for aPL in daily practice within 3 years, we retrospectively analyzed data from 161 patients that were either triple aPL-positive or single aCL-positive with 5 years' follow-up for 121 of them.

RESULTS

Whatever triple or single aPL positivity, we found a high prevalence of "carrier" patients (43%), which led us to question the clinical relevance of the triple aPL positivity. This result also justified the need to identify high-risk profiles. In asymptomatic patients, high risk of thrombotic events is associated with (1) two positive tests for LA or a Rosner Index >27 combined with both aCL-IgG and aB2GPI-IgG positivity, (2) persistent single aCL positivity without an associated autoimmune disease. In symptomatic patients, we demonstrated differences in the phenotype of patients and their therapeutic anticoagulation according to the number of positive aPL but we did not find differences in the number of clinical events, recurrence, or relapse, even in the absence of treatment.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the thrombotic risk does not necessarily increase with the number of positive tests and raises the question of the therapeutic management of single aCL-positive patients.

Current Promising Biomarkers and Methods in the Diagnostics of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Review

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a hypercoagulation condition associated with the incidence of heterogenic antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), which non-specifically affect hemostasis processes. APS is clinically manifested by recurrent arterial and venous thromboses and reproduction losses. The aPL antibodies, which may induce clinical manifestations of APS, include criteria antibodies anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I, and lupus anticoagulant, but also non-criteria antibodies, for example anti-β2-glycoprotein-I domain I, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, anti-annexin V, and many others. APS occurs mostly in patients of younger and middle age, most frequently in females. Laboratory diagnostics of APS are quite difficult, as they include a wide spectrum of examining methods, which are based on various principles of detection and are performed using various laboratory techniques. The objective of the review is to describe the current state of potentially examined biomarkers and methods in APS diagnostics. The aforementioned biomarkers are lupus anticoagulant, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I, anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I domain I, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I IgA, anti-cardiolipin IgA, anti-annexin V and II, anti-prothrombin, anti-cardiolipin/vimentin, anti-protein S/protein C, and antibodies against phospholipid antigens for whose diagnostics we may use some of the methods established for a long time and some of the modern methods—the coagulation method for the determination of lupus anticoagulant (LA), enzyme-linked imunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemiluminescence analysis (CLIA), multiplex fluorescence flow immunoassay (MFFIA), fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (EliA), line immunoassay (LIA), multiline dot assay (MLDA), and thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Conclusion: Antibodies against phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, cardiolipin/vimentin complex, and annexin V are currently the most studied new markers. However, these assays have not been standardized until now, both from the laboratory and clinical point of view. In this review we summarize the evidence of the most studied aPL markers and their potential clinical significance in seronegative APS (SN-APS).

Pathophysiology of Cardiovascular Complications in COVID-19

Numerous recent studies have shown that patients with underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD) are at increased risk of more severe clinical course as well as mortality of COVID-19. Also, the available data suggests that COVID-19 is related to numerous de novo cardiovascular complications especially in the older population and those with pre-existing chronic cardiometabolic conditions. SARS-CoV-2 virus can cause acute cardiovascular injury, as well as increase the risk of chronic cardiovascular damage. As CVD seem to be the major comorbidity in critically unwell patients with COVID-19 and patients often die of cardiovascular complications, we review the literature and discuss the possible pathophysiology and molecular pathways driving these disease processes: cytokine release syndrome, RAAS system dysregulation, plaque destabilization and coagulation disorders with the aim to identify novel treatment targets. In addition, we review the pediatric population, the major cause of the cardiovascular complications is pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome that is believed to be associated with COVID-19 infection. Due to the increasingly recognized CVD damage in COVID-19, there is a need to establish clear clinical and follow-up protocols and to identify and treat possible comorbidities that may be risk factors for the development of cardiovascular complications.