Haploidentical transplantation using posttransplant cyclophosphamide as GVHD prophylaxis in patients over age 70

Comparison of Outcomes of Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Older Versus Younger Patients

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from an HLA haploidentical (haplo) donor followed by graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) results in lower relapse rates and improved DFS when compared to haplo bone marrow transplant (BMT) with PTCy. However, PBSCT leads to higher rates of GVHD. It is unknown whether the benefits of haplo PBSCT may be nullified in older patients (>60 years) by a higher susceptibility to GVHD and transplant related toxicity. Thus, we sought to determine if older patients receiving haplo PBSCT with PTCy experience significantly worse outcomes than younger patients.

METHODS

We evaluated 121 adult patients with hematologic malignancies treated at the Moffitt Cancer Center with allogeneic haplo PBSCT followed by PTCy and compared outcomes of patients ≥60 years (n = 55) versus patients <60 years (n = 66).

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) from the competing risk regression analysis was worse for the older patient group (SHR = 4.05, 95% CI: 1.43-11.47, p = 0.008). However, there was no significant difference between groups in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), relapse, disease-free survival (DFS), or overall survival (OS). Instead, hematopoietic comorbidity index (HCT-CI) ≥ 3 was associated with worse DFS (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.04-3.34, p = 0.035) and OS (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.03-3.84, p-value = 0.042). Subgroup analysis of patients ≥60 years showed a trend toward improved 2-year OS with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation (Flu/Cy/TBI) versus fludarabine/busulfan: 71% versus 53% (HR = 0.47, p = 0.121). In patients over 70 years (n = 14), NRM was 8% and OS was 76% at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Given similar OS and DFS between patients aged >60 years and those <60, haplo PBSCT with PTCy appears to be an appropriate transplant platform for older patients.

Current status of conditioning regimens in haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation

The development of effective prophylaxis strategies against graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has contributed to the widespread use of haploidentical related hematopoietic cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT). Currently, GVHD prophylaxis containing posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) is considered the standard of care in Haplo-HCT, and recent studies have shown comparable results for PTCY-based Haplo-HCT and HCT from other donor sources. The conditioning regimen plays an important role in eradicating tumor cells to prevent disease relapse and suppressing the recipient's immune system to facilitate engraftment. PTCY-based Haplo-HCT was initially developed using a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen consisting of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and low-dose total body irradiation, but high relapse rates reinforced the need to intensify the conditioning regimen. In this respect, various myeloablative and reduced-intensity conditioning regimens have been investigated. However, the optimal conditioning regimens for PTCY-based Haplo-HCT have not yet been established, and this issue needs to be addressed based on data from patients undergoing the procedure. In this article, we review the existing literature on conditioning regimens for PTCY-based Haplo-HCT and discuss future perspectives.

The history of haploidentical stem cell transplantation: a trip from the bench to the bedside

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is a curative intervention for both neoplastic and non-malignant conditions. However, not all patients have an HLA-matched donor. Therefore, the development of an approach that expand the donor pool was of paramount relevance. The development of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as graft versus host disease prophylaxis allows the safe use of haploidentical donors, solving the donor availability problem to the vast majority of patients in need. The present paper reviews the history of the development of haploidentical transplantation at Johns Hopkins University, from the bench to the bedside.

When and how to transplant in myelofibrosis - recent trends

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is currently the only treatment modality that is capable of curing myelofibrosis (MF). Although outcomes of AHSCT have improved vastly in recent years owing to advancements in HLA typing, conditioning regimens, and supportive care, it remains a procedure with a considerable risk in MF patients due to conditioning regimen related toxicity, higher rates of graft failure, infections, and graft versus host disease (GVHD). Recent progress in the treatment and prevention of GVHD with post-transplant cyclophosphamide has also rendered transplantation from alternative donors feasible and safer, thus improving access to patients without HLA-identical donors. Accordingly, all patients with intermediate or high-risk MF today should be referred for potential transplant evaluation to consider the pros and cons of an early versus a delayed transplant strategy. Individual risk assessment in MF is best facilitated by contemporary prognostic models that incorporate both clinical and genetic risk factors. The current review highlights new information regarding risk stratification in MF, anchored by practical algorithms that facilitate patient selection for specific treatment actions, including AHSCT.

Reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen with low dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for haploidentical stem cell transplantation in older patients

Reduced-toxicity conditioning (RIC) regimens are used for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in older patients. However, successful outcomes are hindered by graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), treatment-related mortality, and relapse, particularly after haploidentical donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID-HSCT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an RIC conditioning regimen that included a combination of cyclosporin A, methotrexate (on day + 1), mycophenolate, lower doses of post-transplantation PTCy (40 mg/kg on day + 3), and ATG (7.5 mg/kg) as GVHD prophylaxis prior to haplo-stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) in older patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed outcomes in 55 patients ≥ 55 years of age with hematologic malignancies treated with fludarabine, cytarabine, busulfan, and low-dose cyclophosphamide as the conditioning regimen between January 1, 2019, and November 30, 2023.

RESULTS

Neutrophil engraftment was successful in all patients within 28 days, with 54 patients (98.2%) achieving complete donor chimerism. The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 0% at 30 days, 7.5% at 100 days, and 19% at 1 year. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was 25% (95%CI, 15-38%), whereas that of grade III-IV aGVHD was 9.1% (95% CI, 3.3-19%). The cumulative incidence of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease at 1 year was 3.6% (95%CI, 0.66-11%). The cumulative incidences of relapse, overall survival, and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival at 1 year were 9.0%, 71.6%, and 67.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

An RIC conditioning regimen, including a combination of lower PTCy/ATG as GVHD prophylaxis, followed by haplo-SCT, might be a promising option for appropriately selected older patients.

Recipient clonal hematopoiesis in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for lymphoid malignancies

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation (alloBMT) is increasingly being used in older patients with blood cancer. Aging is associated with an increasing incidence of clonal hematopoiesis (CH). Although the effects of donor CH on alloBMT has been reported, the impact of recipient CH on alloBMT outcomes is unknown. In this retrospective study, alloBMT recipients age 60 and older with lymphoid malignancies were included. Among 97 consecutive patients who received alloBMT between 2017 and 2022, CH was detected in 60 (62%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 51-72). CH was found in 45% (95% CI, 28-64) of patients aged 60 to 64, 64% (95% CI, 44-81) of patients aged 65% to 69%, and 73% (95% CI, 59-87) in those above 70. Pretransplant CH was associated with worse survival after alloBMT: 3-year overall survival (OS) was 78% (95% CI, 65-94) for patients without CH vs 47% (95% CI, 35-63) for those with CH, (unadjusted HR, 3.1; [95% CI, 1.4-6.8; P < .001]). Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was higher in patients with CH; cumulative incidence of NRM at 1-year was 11% (95% CI, 1-22) vs 35% (95% CI, 23-48), (HR, 3.4; [95% CI, 1.4-8.5], P = .009]). Among CH patients, worse OS and NRM was associated with CH burden and number of mutations. Recipient CH had no effect on relapse. In conclusion, older patients with CH experience worse outcomes after alloBMT, almost exclusively attributable to increased NRM. CH is a strong, independent predictor of outcomes. Novel strategies to ameliorate the adverse impacts of patient CH on transplant outcomes are being evaluated.

Preconditioning Frailty Phenotype Influences Survival and Relapse for Older Allogeneic Transplantation Recipients

Hematologic malignancies disproportionately affect older adults. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is potentially curative, but poor overall survival (OS) has limited its use in older adults. Fried's frailty phenotype (FFP) is a geriatric assessment tool that combines objective and subjective performance measures: gait speed, grip strength, activity level, exhaustion, and weight loss. People meeting ≥3 criteria are classified as frail; 1 or 2 criteria, as pre-frail; and 0 criteria, as fit. To evaluate the association of pre-HCT FFP with post-HCT outcomes, we assessed FFP prior to conditioning for 280 HCT recipients age ≥60 years with acute leukemia or a myeloid neoplasm at 3 institutions. When analyzing survival by age group, patients age ≥70 years had inferior OS compared to patients age 60 to 69 years (P = .002), with corresponding OS estimates of 38.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.8% to 49.9%) and 59.3% (95% CI, 51.9% to 65.9%). Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) also was significantly higher in the older patients (P = .0005); the 2-year cumulative incidences of NRM were 38.5% (95% CI, 27.5% to 49.2%) and 17.2% (95% CI, 12.3% to 22.8%), for older and younger recipients, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse did not differ by age group (P = .3435). Roughly one-third (35.5%) of the patients were fit, 57.5% were pre-frail, and 7.5% were frail, with corresponding 2-year OS estimates of 68.4% (95% CI, 57.9% to 76.8%), 45.5% (95% CI, 37.4% to 53.2%), and 45.8% (95% CI, 23.4% to 65.8%) (P = .013). FFP was not significantly associated with NRM, but being frail or pre-frail was associated with a higher rate of disease-related deaths (33.3% and 27.3%, respectively, compared with 17.4% for fit patients; P = .043). In univariate modeling of restricted mean survival time with a 3-year horizon (RMST_3y), the factors that were significantly associated were FFP, age, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Disease Risk Index (DRI), and HCT-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI). Of those factors, only FFP (P = .006), age (P = .006), KPS (P = .004), and DRI (P = .005) were significantly associated in multivariate modeling of RMST_3y. Estimates of RMST_3y were computed and 5 risk-groups were created with survival ranging from 31.4 months for those who were age 60 to 69 years, fit, had KPS 90 to 100, and low/intermediate-risk DRI compared to 10.5 months for those who had high-risk features for all the evaluated factors. In univariate and multivariate analyses for restricted mean time to relapse with a 3-year horizon (RMRT_3y), FFP (pre-frail versus fit, P = .007; frail versus fit, P = .061) and DRI (P = .001) were the only significant factors. Predicted RMRT_3y was longest (30.6 months) for those who were fit and had low/intermediate-risk DRI scores and shortest (19.1 months) for those who were frail and had high-risk or very high-risk DRI scores. Both age and FFP impact survival after HCT. Incorporation of FFP into pre-HCT evaluations may improve decision-making and counseling regarding HCT risk for older adults. Our findings support future trials designed to reverse frailty, such as pre-HCT supervised exercise programs, and correlative analyses to unravel the connection of frailty and relapse to generate future targets for intervention. Finally, exploration of novel HCT platforms to reduce relapse in pre-frail and frail patients, as well as reduce NRM in adults age >70 years, are warranted.

Cellular therapies in older adults with hematological malignancies: A case-based, state-of-the-art review

Cellular therapies, including autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), and chimeric antigen receptor- (CAR-) T cell therapies are essential treatment modalities for many hematological malignancies. Although their use in older adults has substantially increased within the past decades, cellular therapies represent intensive treatment approaches that exclude a large percentage of older adults due to comorbidities and frailty. Under- and overtreatment in older adults with hematologic malignancy is a challenge and many treatment decisions are influenced by chronologic age. The advent of efficient and well-tolerated newer treatment approaches for multiple myeloma has challenged the role of ASCT. In the modern era, there are no randomized clinical trials of transplant versus non-transplant strategies for patients ≥65 years. Nonetheless, ASCT is feasible for selected older patients and does not result in long-term compromise in quality of life. AlloHCT is the only curative approach for acute myeloid leukemia of intermediate and unfavourable risk but carries a significant risk for non-relapse mortality depending on comorbidities, general fitness, and transplant-specific characteristics, such as intensity of conditioning and donor choice. However, alloHCT is feasible in appropriately-selected older adults. Early referral for evaluation is strongly encouraged as this is the most obvious barrier. CAR-T cell therapies have shown unprecedented clinical efficacy and durability in relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Its use is well tolerated in older adults, although evidence comes from limited case numbers. Whether patients who are deemed unfit for ASCT qualify for CAR-T cell therapy remains elusive, but the tolerability and efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy appears promising, especially for older patients. The evidence from randomized trials is strong in favor of using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to reduce treatment-related toxicities and guide treatment intensity in the care for solid tumors; its use for evaluation of cellular therapies is less evidence-based. However, CGA can provide useful information on patients' fitness, resilient mechanisms, and reveal potential optimization strategies for compensating for vulnerabilities. In this narrative review, we will discuss key questions on cellular therapies in older adults based on illustrative patient cases.

Peripheral blood haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients aged 70 years and over with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) using non-myeloablative conditioning regimen (NMAC) has extended the feasibility of allogeneic transplantation, notably in older patients. However, there is few data specifically focusing on patients aged 70 years and over with AML and MDS. Thus the benefit of transplantation in this population is still debated. Here we report our single center experience of peripheral blood Haplo-SCT with NMAC and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in AML and MDS patients aged 70 years and over. We analyzed 50 patients (27 AML, 23 MDS) with a median age of 72 years (70-77), 12/50 (24%) with active disease at Haplo-SCT. Cumulative incidence of grade 3-4 acute and moderate or severe chronic GVHD were 6% and 25%, respectively. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at day +100 was 0%. NRM, relapse, PFS and OS at 3 years were 16%, 18%, 66%, and 69%, respectively. Among patients who were disease free at 2 years post Haplo-SCT, 88% are living without immunosuppressive treatment. Peripheral blood Haplo-SCT is feasible in selected AML/MDS patients over 70 years, without any early NRM. It produces long-term disease control and survival. Thus, age by itself should not be considered as a formal barrier to Haplo-SCT.

A Study of Physical Resilience and Aging (SPRING): Conceptual framework, rationale, and study design

Understanding the physiological basis of physical resilience to clinical stressors is crucial for the well-being of older adults. This article presents a novel framework to discover the biological underpinnings of physical resilience in older adults as part of the "Characterizing Resiliencies to Physical Stressors in Older Adults: A Dynamical Physiological Systems Approach" study, also known as The Study of Physical Resilience and Aging (SPRING). Physical resilience, defined as the capacity of a person to withstand clinical stressors and quickly recover or improve upon a baseline functional level, is examined in adults aged 55 years and older by studying the dynamics of stress response systems. The hypothesis is that well-regulated stress response systems promote physical resilience. The study employs dynamic stimulation tests to assess energy metabolism, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, the autonomic nervous system, and the innate immune system. Baseline characteristics influencing resilience outcomes are identified through deep phenotyping of physical and cognitive function, as well as of biological, environmental, and psychosocial characteristics. SPRING aims to study participants undergoing knee replacement surgery (n = 100), bone and marrow transplantation (n = 100), or anticipating dialysis initiation (n = 60). Phenotypic and functional measures are collected pre-stressor and at multiple times after stressor for up to 12 months to examine resilience trajectories. By improving our understanding of physical resilience in older adults, SPRING has the potential to enhance resilient outcomes to major clinical stressors. The article provides an overview of the study's background, rationale, design, pilot phase, implementation, and implications for improving the health and well-being of older adults.

How I prevent GVHD in high-risk patients: posttransplant cyclophosphamide and beyond

Advances in conditioning, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and antimicrobial prophylaxis have improved the safety of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), leading to a substantial increase in the number of patients transplanted each year. This influx of patients along with progress in remission-inducing and posttransplant maintenance strategies for hematologic malignancies has led to new GVHD risk factors and high-risk groups: HLA-mismatched related (haplo) and unrelated (MMUD) donors; older recipient age; posttransplant maintenance; prior checkpoint inhibitor and autologous HCT exposure; and patients with benign hematologic disorders. Along with the changing transplant population, the field of HCT has dramatically shifted in the past decade because of the widespread adoption of posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), which has increased the use of HLA-mismatched related donors to levels comparable to HLA-matched related donors. Its success has led investigators to explore PTCy's utility for HLA-matched HCT, where we predict it will be embraced as well. Additionally, combinations of promising new agents for GVHD prophylaxis such as abatacept and JAK inhibitors with PTCy inspire hope for an even safer transplant platform. Using 3 illustrative cases, we review our current approach to transplantation of patients at high risk of GVHD using our modern armamentarium.

Outcomes of two-step haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with hematologic malignancies

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) remains the best curative option for the majority of patients with hematologic malignancies (HM); however, many elderly patients are excluded from transplant and outcome data in this population is still limited. The novel two-step graft engineering approach has been the main platform for allo-SCT at Thomas Jefferson University since 2006. Following administration of the preparative regimen, we infuse donor lymphocytes, followed by cyclophosphamide to induce bidirectional tolerance, then infusion of CD34-selected cells. A total of 76 patients ≥ 65 years old with HM underwent haploidentical (haplo) allo-SCT on the two-step transplant platform between 2007 and 2021. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 11 days and platelet engraftment was 18 days. With a median follow up of 44 months, the 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 36.3% and 35.6%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse at 3 years were 43.5% and 21.0% at 3 years, respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) was 11.1% at 6 months, and chronic GVHD requiring treatment was 15.1% at 2 years. The two-step haplo allo-SCT is a novel alternative platform for high-risk older HM patients, achieving fast engraftment, low relapse rates and promising survival.

Emerging approaches to improve allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes for nonmalignant diseases

Many congenital or acquired nonmalignant diseases (NMDs) of the hematopoietic system can be potentially cured by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with varying types of donor grafts, degrees of HLA matching, and intensity of conditioning regimens. Unique features that distinguish the use of allogeneic HCT in this population include higher rates of graft failure, immune-mediated cytopenias, and the potential to achieve long-term disease-free survival in a mixed chimerism state. Additionally, in contrast to patients with hematologic malignancies, a priority is to completely avoid graft-versus-host disease in patients with NMD because there is no theoretical beneficial graft-versus-leukemia effect that can accompany graft-versus-host responses. In this review, we discuss the current approach to each of these clinical issues and how emerging novel therapeutics hold promise to advance transplant care for patients with NMDs.

PTCY and Tacrolimus for GVHD Prevention for Older Adults Undergoing HLA-Matched Sibling and Unrelated Donor AlloHCT

INTRODUCTION

The use of PTCY for graft-versus-host disease (GHVD) prevention is becoming prevalent in the transplant community when HLA-identical sibling (MSD) and 10/10 HLA-matched (MUD) and 9/10 mismatched (MMUD) unrelated donors are selected for alloHSCT. However, reported evidence on outcomes from elderly receiving PTCY-containing GVHD prophylaxis remains limited.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the outcomes of PTCY-TK prophylaxis and conventional GVHD prophylaxis in patients aged >50 years undergoing peripheral blood alloHSCT from a single institution.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 161 consecutive patients aged >50 years undergoing alloHSCT between Jan-2014 and Feb-2021 were included. Data was collected retrospectively and updated in December 2021. Patients received grafts from HLA-identical sibling (MSD), and from 10/10 and 9/10 HLA matched and mismatched unrelated donors (UD).

RESULTS

Overall, median age was 60 years and 91 (54.8%) received PTCY-TK for GVHD prevention. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was longer in the PTCY-TK group (20 vs. 16 days and 19 vs. 11 days, P< 0.001). The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV aGVHD at day +100 and moderate/severe cGVHD at 2 years were 18.2%, 5.7% and 9.5% for patients receiving PTCY-TK, and 26.0%, 9.6% and 39.5% for those that did not. The multivariate analysis showed that PTCY-TK reduced the probability of grade II-IV aGVHD (HR 0.41, p=0.035), of cGVHD [any grade: HR 0.43 (p=0.014), and of moderate/severe cGVHD (HR 0.15 (p<0.001)]. At 2-years, the overall survival (65.4% vs. 65.6%, p=0.472), non-relapse mortality (17.4% vs. 13.7%, p=0.967), and cumulative incidence of relapse rates (24.2% vs. 27.5%, p=0.712) were comparable between both cohorts; GVHD-Free/Relapse-free survival (GRFS) was higher in the PTCY-TK group (2-years: 50.2% vs. 21.8%; HR 0.42, p=0.001). In patients aged ≥50 years, Conclusion: PTCY-TK was safe and a more effective drug combination than non-PTCY containing GVHD prophylaxis, even with the use of matched and mismatched UD, and resulted in comparable relapse rates and better GRFS.

Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft- versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis with Nonmyeloablative Conditioning for Blood or Marrow Transplantation for Myelofibrosis

We describe outcomes after post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and nonmyeloablative conditioning-based allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation for myelofibrosis using matched or mismatched related or unrelated donors. The conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation. Forty-two patients were included, with a median age of 63 years, of whom 19% had Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS)-plus intermediate-1 risk, 60% had intermediate-2 risk, and 21% had high-risk disease, and 60% had at least 1 high-risk somatic mutation. More than 90% of patients engrafted neutrophils, at a median of 19.5 days, and 7% experienced graft failure. At 1 year and 3 years, respectively, overall survival was 65% and 60%, relapse-free survival was 65% and 31%, relapse was 5% and 40%, and nonrelapse mortality was 30% and 30%. Acute graft-versus-host disease grade 3-4 was seen in 17% of patients at 1 year, and chronic graft-versus-host disease requiring systemic therapy in occurred in 12% patients. Spleen size ≥17 cm or prior splenectomy was associated with inferior relapse-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 3.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 10.37; P = .02) and higher relapse rate (subdistribution HR [SDHR] not calculable; P = .01). Age >60 years (SDHR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.80, P = .02) and receipt of peripheral blood grafts (SDHR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.99; P = .05) were associated with a lower risk of relapse. In our limited sample, the presence of a high-risk mutation was not statistically significantly associated with an inferior outcome, although ASXL1 was suggestive of inferior survival (SDHR, 2.36; 95% CI, 0.85 to 6.6; P = .09). Overall, this approach shows outcomes comparable those of to previously reported approaches and underscores the importance of spleen size in the evaluation of transplantation candidates.

OUP accepted manuscript

As in younger patients, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) offers the best chance for durable remission in older patients (≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, defining the best treatment strategy (and in particular, whether or not to proceed to alloHSCT) for elderly patients with AML remains a difficult decision for the hematologist, since potential toxicity of conditioning regimens, risks of graft-versus-host disease, impaired immune reconstitution and the need for prolonged immunosuppression may be of major concern in these vulnerable patients with complex needs. Hopefully, significant progress has been made over the past decade in alloHSCT for elderly patients and current evidence suggests that chronological age per se (between 60 and 75) is not a reliable predictor of outcome after alloHSCT. Here, we review the current state of alloHSCT in elderly patients with AML and also discuss the different approaches currently being investigated to improve both accessibility to as well as success of alloHSCT in these patients.

Effectiveness of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Outcomes with conventional chemotherapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain disappointing, with few cures. For younger patients with AML, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers the best chance for cure, but this strategy is seldomly used for older patients. With recently improved methodologies, transplantation has become increasingly safe, suggesting that its use in older patients be reconsidered. This report will address four issues: the current frequency of transplantation for AML according to patient age; the impact of patient age on transplant outcomes; the comparative outcomes of transplantation versus chemotherapy for older patients with AML; and possible methods to improve the outcome of allogeneic HCT in older patients with AML.

A phase II study of azacitidine in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as maintenance treatment, after allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation in patients with poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)

Relapse is the most common cause of treatment failure following allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) for AML or MDS. Post-transplant maintenance therapies may prevent relapse. We conducted a phase II trial combining azacitidine (AZA) with GM-CSF in non-relapsed, post-transplant patients with AML or MDS. Patients received escalating doses of AZA to a maximum of 75 mg/m2 for 5 days per cycle for up to 12 cycles. GM-CSF was given on days 1-10 of each cycle. Eighteen patients were treated following non-myeloablative (17) and myeloablative (1) alloBMT for AML (61.1%), MDS (27.7%), or therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (11.1%). The majority of patients (72%) received their graft from an HLA-haploidentical donor. The treatment was well-tolerated with rare grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities. One patient suffered an exacerbation of GVHD. The 24-month relapse-free and overall survivals were 47 and 57%, respectively, with a median of 18.6 and 29 months.

Feasibility of an intensified myeloablative conditioning regimen consisting of busulfan, fludarabine, cytarabine, and total body irradiation before single cord blood transplantation in elderly patients

The optimal conditioning regimen for stem cell transplantation in elderly patients remains to be established. We developed a novel preparative regimen using fludarabine 180 mg/m², intravenous busulfan 12.8 mg/m², cytarabine 8 g/m², and 4-Gy total body irradiation before cord blood transplantation (CBT) in patients older than 55 years with various hematological malignancies. All but one patient received graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisting of cyclosporine (CsA) and short-term methotrexate (sMTX). Thirty-three patients were included in this study, with a median age of 64 years (range 56-70). The disease risk index was high or very high in 67% of patients, and 73% had a disease status other than complete remission. The probabilities of overall survival and disease-free survival at 3 years were 60 and 57%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality at 3 years were 18 and 25%, respectively. Regimen-related toxicities were generally tolerable. Disease-free survivors (n = 20) stopped immunosuppressants at a median of 7.4 months (range 2.6-25.0), in all cases by the time of the last follow-up. In conclusion, this highly myeloablative conditioning regimen resulted in a high probability of disease-free, GVHD-free, immunosuppressant-free survival after single CBT.(190 words).

Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with a variety of malignancies including post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). These include B and T cell lymphomas, epithelial, and mesenchymal tumors. The virus is ubiquitous, transmitted in saliva, and not usually associated with the development of malignancy. PTLD is usually associated with EBV when it occurs soon after the transplant. Measurement of viral DNA in blood, especially plasma, may be useful in the diagnosis of PTLD. Treatment approaches include withdrawal of immunosuppression, monoclonal antibodies or antibody conjugates, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and a variety of virus-specific treatments such as adoptive cellular therapy with EBV-specific T cells. Approaches to prevention include selection of immunosuppressive regimens that minimize the risk. In the future, EBV vaccines may be available for potential transplant recipients.