Alternative donor transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes: haploidentical relative and matched unrelated donors

Characterization of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease After Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation With Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide: A Study on Behalf of GETH-TC

BACKGROUND

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a cause of late morbidity and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Although studies evaluating haploidentical allo-HSCT (haplo-HSCT) using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) demonstrate lower cGVHD rates, comprehensive data describing the clinical profile, risk factors, or outcomes of cGVHD within this platform are scarce.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of 389 consecutive patients who underwent haplo-HSCT PTCy in 7 transplant centers of the Spanish Group Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyético y Terapia Celular (GETH-TC) between 2008 and 2020 describing incidence, clinical profile, risk factors, and cGVHD outcomes.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients of 389 developed cGVHD. Our data revealed that the incidence and severity of cGVHD are lower than those reported for HLA-identical transplantation with conventional prophylaxis and that the strongest predictor for cGVHD was previous acute GVHD ( P  = 0.031). Also, recipient age ≥60 y ( P  = 0.044) was protective against cGVHD. Moreover, patients with moderate cGVHD had longer event-free survival at 3 y than other patients ( P  = 0.016) and a lower relapse rate at 3 y ( P  = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the fact that the incidence and severity of cGVHD are lower than those reported for HLA-identical transplantation with conventional prophylaxis. In this series, patients who develop moderate cGVHD after haplo-HSCT PTCy had a higher overall survival and event-free survival, and lower relapse, suggesting higher graft-versus-leukemia effect. Although this is the largest series focused on characterizing cGVHD in haplo-HSCT PTCy, further prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings.

Biologically Randomized Comparison of Haploidentical Versus Human Leukocyte Antigen-Matched Related Donor Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Using haploidentical donors for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) broadens transplant accessibility to a growing number of patients with hematologic disorders. Moreover, haploidentical HCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has become widespread practice due to accumulating evidence demonstrating favorable rates of survival and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Most studies comparing outcomes by donor sources have been confounded by variability in conditioning regimens, graft type (peripheral blood [PB] or bone marrow), and post-transplant GvHD prophylaxis (PTCy or non-PTCy), making it difficult to define the effect of donor source on outcomes. Levine Cancer Institute started a transplant and cellular therapy program in 2014, with both haploidentical and matched related donor (MRD) transplants initially performed using a uniform reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen, PB grafts, and PTCy-based GvHD prophylaxis. This retrospective observational study was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes associated with RIC haploidentical HCT and MRD HCT in patients receiving identical conditioning regimens, graft types, and supportive care. Our transplant database was queried to evaluate demographic characteristics, clinical features, and outcomes of RIC HCT for consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies who received haploidentical or MRD grafts between March 2014 and December 2017. An MRD was the preferred donor source; when unavailable, a haploidentical donor was used. Sixty-seven patients underwent haploidentical HCT and 25 MRD HCT. Overall, characteristics of transplant recipients were similar for the haploidentical and MRD groups; however, haploidentical donors were younger than MRDs (median 36 yr versus 57 yr, P < .0001). Results of univariable analysis showed similar overall survival (OS) for haploidentical and MRD HCT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.15; 95% CI, 0.61 to 2.15; P = .669). One-year, 1-yr, and 5-yr OS were 80.2%, 54.7%, and 41.2% for haploidentical HCT and 76.0%, 55.7%, and 51.1% for MRD HCT, respectively. With a median follow-up of 81.90 months, results of multivariable analysis revealed that donor source (haploidentical versus MRD) was not significantly associated with OS (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.87; P = .933), relapse-free survival (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.35; P = .337), cumulative incidence of relapse (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.70; P = .579), or non-relapse mortality (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.40 to 3.14; P = .827). Cumulative incidences of acute GvHD (aGvHD) and chronic GvHD (cGvHD) were not significantly different for haploidentical and MRD HCT (grades II to IV aGvHD: HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.72 to 4.37; P = .210; grades III to IV aGvHD: HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 0.34 to 23.63; P = .335; cGvHD: HR, 1.00; 95% CI 0.36 to 2.76; P = .995). With care that was homogenous in terms of conditioning regimens, graft type, GvHD prophylaxis, and supportive care, 92 patients who were biologically randomized to either haploidentical HCT or MRD HCT after RIC with PTCy had comparable outcomes.

Current challenges in conditioning regimens for MDS transplantation

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a very heterogeneous clonal disorder. Patients with "higher-risk" MDS, defined by specific recurrent genetic abnormalities, have a poor prognosis because of a high risk of progression to secondary acute myeloid leukemia with low chemosensitivity. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only treatment that offers durable disease control because the donor immune system allows graft-versus-MDS effects. In terms of preparation steps before transplantation, targeting the malignant clone by increasing the conditioning regimen intensity is still a matter of intense debate. MDS is mainly diagnosed in older patients, and high toxicity related to common myeloablative conditioning regimens has been reported. Efforts to include new drugs in the conditioning regimen to achieve the best malignant clone control without increasing toxicity have been made over the past 20 years. We summarized these retrospective and prospective studies and evaluated the limitations of the available evidence to delineate the ideal conditioning regimen.

Advances in the management of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: future prospects

Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) are defined using a number of prognostic scoring systems that include the degree of cytopenias, percentage of blasts, cytogenetic alterations, and more recently genomic data. HR-MDS encompasses characteristics such as progressive cytopenias, increased bone marrow blasts, unfavorable cytogenetics, and an adverse mutational profile. Survival is generally poor, and patients require therapy to improve outcomes. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs), such as azacitidine, decitabine, and more recently, oral decitabine/cedazuridine, are the only approved therapies for HR-MDS. These are often continued until loss of response, progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Combinations including an HMA plus other drugs have been investigated but have not demonstrated better outcomes compared to single-agent HMA. Moreover, in a disease of high genomic complexity such as HR-MDS, therapy targeting specific genomic abnormalities is of interest. This review will examine the biological underpinnings of HR-MDS, its therapeutic landscape in the frontline and relapsed settings, as well as the impact of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the only known curative intervention for this disease.

Donor types and outcomes of transplantation in myelofibrosis: a CIBMTR study

ABSTRACT

We evaluate the impact of donor types on outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in myelofibrosis, using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry data for HCTs done between 2013 and 2019. In all 1597 patients, the use of haploidentical donors increased from 3% in 2013 to 19% in 2019. In study-eligible 1032 patients who received peripheral blood grafts for chronic-phase myelofibrosis, 38% of recipients of haploidentical HCT were non-White/Caucasian. Matched sibling donor (MSD)-HCTs were associated with superior overall survival (OS) in the first 3 months (haploidentical hazard ratio [HR], 5.80 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.52-13.35]; matched unrelated (MUD) HR, 4.50 [95% CI, 2.24-9.03]; mismatched unrelated HR, 5.13 [95% CI, 1.44-18.31]; P < .001). This difference in OS aligns with lower graft failure with MSD (haploidentical HR, 6.11 [95% CI, 2.98-12.54]; matched unrelated HR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.20-4.51]; mismatched unrelated HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 0.58-5.72]). There was no significant difference in OS among haploidentical, MUD, and mismatched unrelated donor HCTs in the first 3 months. Donor type was not associated with differences in OS beyond 3 months after HCT, relapse, disease-free survival, or OS among patients who underwent HCT within 24 months of diagnosis. Patients who experienced graft failure had more advanced disease and commonly used nonmyeloablative conditioning. Although MSD-HCTs were superior, there is no significant difference in HCT outcomes from haploidentical and MUDs. These results establish haploidentical HCT with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide as a viable option in myelofibrosis, especially for ethnic minorities underrepresented in the donor registries.

How I reduce and treat posttransplant relapse of MDS

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only potentially curative option for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Advances in conditioning regimens and supportive measures have reduced treatment-related mortality and increased the role of transplantation, leading to more patients undergoing HSCT. However, posttransplant relapse of MDS remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for this procedure, necessitating expert management and ongoing results analysis. In this article, we review treatment options and our institutional approaches to managing MDS relapse after HSCT, using illustrative clinical cases that exemplify different clinical manifestations and management of relapse. We address areas of controversy relating to conditioning regimen intensity, chemotherapeutic bridging, and donor selection. In addition, we discuss future directions for advancing the field, including (1) the need for prospective clinical trials separating MDS from acute myeloid leukemia and focusing on posttransplant relapse, as well as (2) the validation of measurable residual disease methodologies to guide timely interventions.

Outcomes with HLA-matched unrelated donor versus haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation

We investigated the outcomes after adult haploidentical (haplo) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in a single-center study (n = 452) including 276 MUD and 176 haplo transplants. Myeloablative (37%) and reduced-intensity conditioning (63%) were performed. Graft sources included peripheral blood (50%) and bone marrow (50%). GVHD prophylaxis included tacrolimus/methotrexate (53%) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based (47%). In MUD versus haplo HCT recipients, a similar incidence of neutrophil engraftment (18 vs 17 days, p = 0.895), grade II-IV acute GVHD (51% vs 50%, p = 0.773), relapse (26% vs 23%, p = 0.578), non-relapse mortality (22% vs 23%, p = 0.817), 1-year disease-free survival (62% vs 63%. p = 0.921), and 1-year overall survival (73% vs 74%, p = 0.744) were observed. Earlier platelet engraftment (22 vs 27 days, p < 0.001) and higher chronic GVHD (45% vs 35%, p = 0.040) were noted in MUD as compared to haplo HCT. Allogeneic transplantation should be done promptly whenever indicated, utilizing either matched unrelated or haploidentical donors.

HLA-Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide versus HLA-Matched Unrelated Donor Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the sole curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). In the absence of an HLA-matched sibling donor, an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) is considered the leading candidate. However, in recent decades, the alternative donor pool has been extended to HLA-haploidentical donors, especially with the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy). Comparative data for haploidentical and MUD allo-HCT in patients with MDS are scarce. We retrospectively analyzed 697 adult patients with MDS who underwent HLA-haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT) with PTCy (n = 136), MUD bone marrow transplantation (MUD-BMT) (n = 465), or MUD peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (MUD-PBSCT) (n = 96) as their first allo-HCT between 2014 and 2020 using Japanese registry data. Multivariable analyses demonstrated faster neutrophil engraftment (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to 2.90; P < .001) and platelet engraftment (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.72 to 3.10; P < 0001) in the MUD-PBSCT cohort compared with the haplo-PBSCT cohort. MUD-BMT was associated with a higher incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD than haplo-PBSCT (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.00 to 2.29; P = .048). Among patients without in vivo T cell depletion using antithymocyte globulin (ATG) (haplo-PBSCT, n = 136; MUD-BMT, n = 446; MUD-PBSCT, n = 65), MUD-PBSCT recipients experienced faster hematopoietic recovery, MUD-BMT recipients (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.32; P = .042) or MUD-PBSCT recipients (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.18; P = .03) had a higher incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD, and MUD-PBSCT recipients developed chronic GVHD more frequently than haplo-PBSCT recipients (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.89; P = .034). There were no significant differences in overall survival, disease-free survival, GVHD-free relapse-free survival, relapse, or nonrelapse mortality in the haplo-PBSCT cohort versus the MUD-BMT or MUD-PBSCT cohorts. In conclusion, despite differences in the incidences of hematopoietic engraftment and GVHD depending on graft type and ATG use in MUD transplant recipients, major transplantation outcomes were comparable between recipients of haplo-PBSCT using PTCy and recipients of MUD-BMT or MUD-PBSCT.

Impact of CD34 positive cell dose in donor graft on the outcomes after haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide - A retrospective single-center study with a Japanese cohort

BACKGROUND

Haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is an important therapeutic option for patients lacking an HLA-matched donor. However, the significance of CD34+ cell dose in grafts has not been fully elucidated.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore the impact of CD34+ cell dose on outcomes after haplo-PBSCT with PTCy.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively investigated 111 consecutive patients who underwent haplo-PBSCT with PTCy or HLA-matched PBSCT from related donors.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in 3-year overall survival (p = 0.559) or progression-free survival (p = 0.974) between haplo-PBSCT and matched PBSCT. Delayed neutrophil engraftment and a lower incidence of graft-versus-host disease were observed in haplo-PBSCT. The median dose of CD34+ cells was 4.9 × 106 /kg in 57 haplo-PBSCT and 4.5 × 106 /kg in 54 matched PBSCTs. Importantly, patients who underwent haplo-PBSCT with the administration of CD34+ cell at a dose of ≥4.0 × 106 /kg significantly had improved OS (p = 0.015) and decreased incidence of disease relapse (p = 0.001) without increasing incidence of GVHD.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that a higher dose of CD34+ cells in haplo-PBSCT with PTCy positively impacts the outcomes without an increase of GVHD.

Sirolimus Is an Acceptable Alternative to Tacrolimus for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis after Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), tacrolimus (Tac), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for allogeneic haploidentical donor (haplo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) results in comparable outcomes to matched unrelated donor HCT. A phase II study from the Moffitt Cancer Center substituting sirolimus (Siro) for Tac in this prophylactic regimen reported comparable rates of grade II-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD). Many centers have substituted Siro for Tac in this setting based on a preferable side effect profile, although comparative data are limited. In this study, we retrospectively compared outcomes in haplo-HCT with PTCy/Siro/MMF versus haplo-HCT with PTCy/Tac/MMF. The study cohort included all consecutive patients receiving haploidentical donor T cell-replete peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) HCT for hematologic malignancies at Moffitt Cancer Center or the City of Hope National Medical Center between 2014 and 2019. A total of 423 patients were included, of whom 84 (20%) received PTCy/Siro/MMF and 339 (80%) received PTCy/Tac/MMF. The median age for the entire cohort was 54 years (range, 18 to 78 years), and the median follow-up was 30 months. The Siro group had a higher proportion of patients age ≥60 years (58% versus 34%; P < .01), and the groups also differed in diagnosis type, conditioning regimen, and cytomegalovirus serostatus. There were no significant differences in the rates of grade II-IV aGVHD (45% versus 47%; P = .6) at day +100 or chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (47% versus 54%; P = .79) at 2 years post-HCT. In multivariate analysis, neutrophil engraftment at day +30 was significantly better in the Tac group (odds ratio, .30; 95% confidence interval, .1 to .83; P = .02), with a median time to engraftment of 17 days versus 18 days in the Siro group, but platelet engraftment was similar in the 2 groups. Otherwise, in multivariate analysis, GVHD prophylaxis type had no significant influence on aGVHD or cGVHD, nonrelapse mortality, relapse, GVHD-free relapse-free survival, disease-free survival, or overall survival after PBSC haplo-HCT. These findings suggest that Siro is a comparable alternative to Tac in combination with PTCy/MMF for GVHD prophylaxis, with overall similar clinical outcomes despite delayed engraftment after peripheral blood stem cell haplo-HCT. Although Tac remains the standard of care, Siro may be substituted based on the side effect profile of these medications, with consideration of patient medical comorbidities at HCT.

The prognosis and risk factors for patients with complex karyotype myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is the curative treatment for myelodysplastic syndrome with a complex karyotype (CK-MDS). However, only a few studies have been limited to patients with CK-MDS undergoing allogeneic HCT. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for patients with CK-MDS undergoing allogeneic HCT. We included 691 patients with CK-MDS who received their first allogeneic HCT. The overall survival (OS) was the primary end-point, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were identified using a Cox proportional hazards model. The 3-year OS was 29.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.3-33.3). In the multivariable analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.11-1.88), male sex (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.11-1.71), poor haematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.20-1.81), red blood cell transfusion requirement (HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.13-2.20), platelet transfusion requirement (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.46-2.35), not-complete remission (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.16-2.06), a high number of karyotype abnormality (HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.18-2.25) and monosomal karyotype (HR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.05-2.12) were significantly associated with OS. Thus, the 3-year OS of allogeneic HCT was 29.8% in patients with CK-MDS, and we identified risk factors associated with poor OS.

Single-unit unrelated cord blood transplantation versus HLA-matched sibling transplantation in adults with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: A registry-based study from the adult MDS working group of the Japanese society for transplantation and cellular therapy

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only potential curative therapeutic modality for advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Within HCT, the advancement of cord blood transplantation (CBT) procedures has resulted in a drastic expansion of CBT as a donor source for MDS. However, data comparing matched sibling donors (MSDs) HCT with CBT for advanced MDS, which was defined as refractory anemia with an excess of blasts (RAEB)-1 and RAEB-2 according to the World Health Organization classification at the time of HCT, have not been explored. We retrospectively compared survival and other posttransplant outcomes in 999 adult patients with advanced MDS after receiving allogeneic HCT in Japan between 2011 and 2020, using either MSD (n = 331) or single-unit unrelated cord blood (UCB) (n = 668). In the multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.34; P = 0.347), disease-free survival (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84-1.23; P = 0.845), relapse (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.68-1.15; P = 0.370), or non-relapse mortality (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.87-1.50; P = 0.310) between MSD recipients and UCB recipients. UCB was significantly associated with lower neutrophil (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.24-0.33; P < 0.001) and lower platelet (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.23-0.36; P < 0.001) recovery compared to MSD. UCB was significantly associated with a lower incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44-0.75; P < 0.001) and extensive chronic GVHD (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.67; P < 0.001) compared to MSD. Similar results were observed after adjusting for differences between MSD and UCB recipients by propensity score matching analysis. Our study demonstrated that single CBT and MSD HCT had similar survival outcomes for adult patients with advanced MDS despite the lower hematopoietic recovery in CBT recipients and higher chronic GVHD in MSD recipients.

Clinical decision-making and treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes

ABSTRACT

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) constitute a profoundly heterogeneous myeloid malignancy with a common origin in the hemopoietic stem cell compartment. Consequently, patient management and treatment are as heterogeneous. Decision-making includes identifying risk, symptoms, and options for an individual and conducting a risk-benefit analysis. The only potential cure is allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and albeit the fraction of patients with MDS who undergo transplant increase over time because of better management and increased donor availability, a majority are not eligible for this intervention. Current challenges encompass to decrease the relapse risk, the main cause of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation failure. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) constitute firstline treatment for higher-risk MDSs. Combinations with other drugs as firstline treatment has, to date, not proven more efficacious than monotherapy, although combinations approved for acute myeloid leukemia, including venetoclax, are under evaluation and often used as rescue treatment. The treatment goal for lower-risk MDS is to improve cytopenia, mainly anemia, quality of life, and, possibly, overall survival. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) constitute firstline treatment for anemia and have better and more durable responses if initiated before the onset of a permanent transfusion need. Treatment in case of ESA failure or ineligibility should be tailored to the main disease mechanism: immunosuppression for hypoplastic MDS without high-risk genetics, lenalidomide for low-risk del(5q) MDS, and luspatercept for MDS with ring sideroblasts. Approved therapeutic options are still scarcer for MDS than for most other hematologic malignancies. Better tools to match disease biology with treatment, that is, applied precision medicines are needed to improve patient outcome.

[Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes]

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is one of the treatment options for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). This treatment is indicated as first-line treatment for high-risk MDS according to the IPSS and R-IPSS classifications and improves overall survival and progression-free survival. However, allo-HSCT is not indicated in first intention for low-risk MDS. It can be discussed in case of cytopenias needing transfusions, poor evolution under other treatment, or in case of poor prognosis molecular anomaly. Allo-HSCT is a treatment that can be complicated by early or late toxicities (graft versus host disease, infections, chemotherapy toxicity…). The decision to do an allo-HSCT is based on the benefit/risk ratio between the risk of progression from MDS to myeloid leukemia and the risk of transplant related mortality, which increases with the patient's age and comorbidities. The indication of a cytoreductive treatment before allo-HSCT depends on the blasts count, and on the delay before the allograft. The use of reduced intensity conditioning regimen and alternative donors such as haploidentical donors, expanded the indications for allo-HSCT. Relapse remains one of the main causes of mortality after allo-HSCT. Some genetic mutations and karyotype anomalies increase the risk of post-transplant relapse. Preventive treatments for relapse are currently being studied. Treatments such as azacytidine, donor lymphocytes infusions or targeted therapies can be used, prophylactically or preemptively.

Should a matched sibling donor still be considered the primary option for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients over 50 years of age with myelodysplastic syndrome?

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donors (MSDs) are the preferred choice for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, as myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is most frequently diagnosed in the elderly, MSDs are also likely to be of advanced age. It is unclear whether an MSD should be considered the primary choice for allogeneic HCT in elderly patients with MDS. We retrospectively compared survival and other outcomes in 1787 patients with MDS over 50 years of age and receiving allogeneic HCT between 2014 and 2020, using either MSD (n = 214), 8/8 allele-matched unrelated donor (MUD) (n = 562), 7/8 allele-MUD (n = 334), or unrelated cord blood (UCB) (n = 677) in Japan. In multivariate analysis, compared to MSD transplants, the risk of relapse was significantly lower following 8/8MUD transplants (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; P = 0.047), whereas non-relapse mortality was significantly higher following UCB transplants (HR, 1.43; P = 0.041). However, donor type did not determine overall survival, disease-free survival, or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival, but chronic GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was better after UCB (HR, 0.80; P = 0.025) and 8/8MUD (HR, 0.81; P = 0.032) compared to MSD transplants. Our study demonstrated that MSDs are not superior to alternative HCT methods, such as 8/8MUD, 7/8MUD, or UCB, in this population.

Outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with haploidentical versus HLA-matched donors in patients with higher-risk MDS

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the best curative option for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. The presence of monosomal karyotype and/or complex karyotype abnormalities predicts inferior survival after allo-SCT in MDS patients. Haploidentical allo-SCT has been increasingly used in acute leukemia (AL) and has similar results as using HLA-matched donors, but data on higher-risk MDS is sparse. We compared outcomes in 266 patients with higher-risk MDS after HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD, n = 79), HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 139) and HLA haploidentical donor (HID, n = 48) from 2010 to 2019. Median donor age differed between the three groups (p < 0.001). The overall survival was significantly different between the three groups with a better OS observed in the MUD group (p = 0.014). This observation could be explained by a higher progression-free survival with MUD (p = 0.014). The cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GvHD was significantly higher in the HID group (p = 0.051). However, in multivariable analysis, patients transplanted using an HID had comparable mortality to patients transplanted using a MUD (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]: 0.58 [0.32-1.07]; p = 0.080) and a MSD ([sHR]: 0.56 [0.28-1.11]; p = 0.094). MUD do not remain a significant positive predictor of survival, suggesting that beyond the donor-recipient HLA matching, the donor age might impact recipient outcome.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between peripheral blood stem cells and peripheral blood stem cells plus bone marrow in myelodysplastic syndrome patients with haploidentical transplantation

The comparison of haploidentical G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood and bone marrow transplantation (HBMT) for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and haploidentical G-CSF-primed peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (HPBSCT) remains unclear. We performed a retrospective analysis using a propensity score method on 140 MDS patients who received HPBSCT (n = 46) or HBMT (n = 94) with BU/CY as a conditioning regimen prior to transplantation at our center between June 2016 and June 2021. HBMT recipients were associated with a reduced incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD (17.22% vs. 30.57%, p = 0.019) within 100 days, reduced 2-year transplant-related mortality (TRM) (14.29% vs. 28.94%, p = 0.045) and superior 2-year overall survival (OS) (81.6% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.027), progression-free survival (PFS) (80.9% vs. 61.2%, p = 0.015), and GVHD relapse-free survival (GRFS) (64.6% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.062) compared with HPBSCT, but 2-year relapse incidence (RI) (5.96% vs. 9.39%, p = 0.445) was not affected. Multivariate analysis revealed that a GPB/GBM mixture was the independent factor for a reduced incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD (p = 0.018) and TRM (p = 0.048), improved OS (p = 0.029), PFS (p = 0.019) and GRFS (p = 0.072). Collectively, the use of a GPB/GBM mixture as stem cell grafts for haplo-HSCT in patients with MDS appears to be an optimal choice.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the Management of Myelodysplastic Syndrome: An Evidence-Based Review from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Committee on Practice Guidelines

The sole curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Here this therapeutic modality is reviewed and critically evaluated in the context of the evidence. Specific criteria were used for searching the published literature and for grading the quality and strength of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations. A panel of MDS experts comprising transplantation and nontransplantation physicians developed consensus treatment recommendations. This review summarizes the standard MDS indications for HCT and addresses areas of controversy. Recent prospective trials have confirmed that allogeneic HCT confers survival benefits in patients with advanced or high-risk MDS compared with nontransplantation approaches, and the use of HCT is increasing in older patients with good performance status. However, patients with high-risk cytogenetic or molecular mutations remain at high risk for relapse. It is unknown whether administration of novel therapies before or after transplantation may decrease the risk of disease relapse in selected populations. Ongoing and future studies will investigate revised approaches to disease risk stratification, patient selection, and post-transplantation approaches to optimize allogeneic HCT outcomes for patients with MDS.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell neoplasms primarily affecting older persons, associated with dysplastic changes of bone marrow cells, peripheral cytopenias, and various risk of leukemic transformation. Although treatment with several drugs has shown improved disease control, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative treatment for MDS. The number of patients receiving a transplant, as well as survival, have increased past years because of the use of reduce-intensity conditioning regimens (RIC) as well as the use of haploidentical donors for transplantation. With treatment-related mortality as main limitation, pre-transplant evaluation is essential to assess risks for this older group of patients. In a recent randomized study, allo-HSCT with RIC for patients >50 years old with higher-risk MDS demonstrated superiority in survival compared with hypomethylating agents. Genetic mutations have been shown to significantly impact treatment outcomes including after transplant. Recently, a transplant-specific risk score (which includes age, donor type, performance status, cytogenetic category, recipient's cytomegalovirus status, percentage of blasts, and platelet count) has shown superiority in transplantation outcome prediction, compared with previous scoring systems. Survival remains low for most patients with TP53 mutations and novel treatment strategies are needed, such as administration of natural killer cells post-transplant, as there is no clear evidence that maintenance therapy after transplantation can improve outcomes.

Myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a family of myeloid cancers with diverse genotypes and phenotypes characterized by ineffective haematopoiesis and risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Some epidemiological data indicate that MDS incidence is increasing in resource-rich regions but this is controversial. Most MDS cases are caused by randomly acquired somatic mutations. In some patients, the phenotype and/or genotype of MDS overlaps with that of bone marrow failure disorders such as aplastic anaemia, paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) and AML. Prognostic systems, such as the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), provide reasonably accurate predictions of survival at the population level. Therapeutic goals in individuals with lower-risk MDS include improving quality of life and minimizing erythrocyte and platelet transfusions. Therapeutic goals in people with higher-risk MDS include decreasing the risk of AML transformation and prolonging survival. Haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can cure MDS, yet fewer than 10% of affected individuals receive this treatment. However, how, when and in which patients with HCT for MDS should be performed remains controversial, with some studies suggesting HCT is preferred in some individuals with higher-risk MDS. Advances in the understanding of MDS biology offer the prospect of new therapeutic approaches.

Responses of regulatory and effector T-cells to low-dose interleukin-2 differ depending on the immune environment after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

CD4⁺Foxp3⁺ regulatory T cells (Tregs) play a central role in the maintenance of immune tolerance after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Tregs promptly respond to low concentrations of IL-2 through the constitutive expression of high-affinity IL-2 receptors. It has been reported that low-dose IL-2 therapy increased circulating Tregs and improved clinical symptoms of chronic GVHD. Clinical studies of IL-2 therapy so far have mainly targeted patients in the chronic phase of transplantation when acute immune responses has subsided. However, the biological and clinical effects of exogenous IL-2 in an acute immune environment have not been well investigated. In the current study, we investigated the impact of exogenous IL-2 therapy on the post-transplant homeostasis of T cell subsets which influence the balance between GVHD and GVL in the acute phase, by setting the various immune environments early after HSCT in murine model. We initially found that 5,000 IU of IL-2 was enough to induce the active proliferation of Treg without influencing other conventional T cells (Tcons) when administered to normal mice. However, activated Tcons showed the response to the same dose of IL-2 in recipients after allogeneic HSCT. In a mild inflammatory environment within a threshold, exogenous IL-2 could effectively modulate Treg homeostasis with just limited influence to activated T cells, which resulted in an efficient GVHD suppression. In contrast, in a severely inflammatory environment, exogenous IL-2 enhanced activated T cells rather than Tregs, which resulted in the exacerbation of GVHD. Of interest, in an immune-tolerant state after transplant, exogenous IL-2 triggered effector T-cells to exert an anti-tumor effect with maintaining GVHD suppression. These data suggested that the responses of Tregs and effector T cells to exogenous IL-2 differ depending on the immune environment in the host, and the mutual balance of the response to IL-2 between T-cell subsets modulates GVHD and GVL after HSCT. Our findings may provide useful information in the optimization of IL-2 therapy, which may be personalized for each patient having different immune status.

Haploidentical vs Matched Unrelated vs Matched Sibling Donor HCT with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide

With the use of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), the outcomes of mismatched related donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are now approaching those of matched donor HCT. Here we compared haploidentical donor HCT versus HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) HCT and HLA-identical sibling donor (MSD) HCT in a cohort in which all patients received PTCy for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We included 661 patients (275 haploidentical, 246 MUD, and 140 MSD HCT). The most common diagnoses were acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. In multivariate analysis, the haploidentical group was found to have significantly higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (hazard ratio [HR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2 to 4.9; P < .001) and inferior progression-free survival (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.4; P < .001) and overall survival (OS; HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6 to 3; P < .001) compared with the MUD group. Relapse was the most common cause of death in all groups. Among causes of NRM, the haploidentical group had more infection-related deaths and fewer GVHD-related deaths than the other groups. The haploidentical group also had a higher risk of viral and fungal infections, grade ≥3 hemorrhagic cystitis, and cardiovascular toxicities and slower reconstitution of CD4, CD8, and regulatory T cells but faster reconstitution of natural killer cells. In an exploratory analysis, older patients with older donors (>50 years for both) appeared to have particularly high NRM and lower OS in the haploidentical group compared with the other groups. Our data suggest that even with the use of PTCy, the outcomes of haploidentical HCT are inferior to those of HLA-matched donor HCT.

BMT for Myelodysplastic Syndrome: When and Where and How

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a diverse group of hematological malignancies distinguished by a combination of dysplasia in the bone marrow, cytopenias and the risk of leukemic transformation. The hallmark of MDS is bone marrow failure which occurs due to selective growth of somatically mutated clonal hematopoietic stem cells. Multiple prognostic models have been developed to help predict survival and leukemic transformation, including the international prognostic scoring system (IPSS), revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R), WHO prognostic scoring system (WPSS) and MD Anderson prognostic scoring system (MDAPSS). This risk stratification informs management as low risk (LR)-MDS treatment focuses on improving quality of life and cytopenias, while the treatment of high risk (HR)-MDS focuses on delaying disease progression and improving survival. While therapies such as erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs), erythroid maturation agents (EMAs), immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMIDs), and hypomethylating agents (HMAs) may provide benefit, allogeneic blood or marrow transplant (alloBMT) is the only treatment that can offer cure for MDS. However, this therapy is marred, historically, by high rates of toxicity and transplant related mortality (TRM). Because of this, alloBMT is considered in a minority of MDS patients. With modern techniques, alloBMT has become a suitable option even for patients of advanced age or with significant comorbidities, many of whom who would not have been considered for transplant in prior years. Hence, a formal transplant evaluation to weigh the complex balance of patient and disease related factors and determine the potential benefit of transplant should be considered early in the disease course for most MDS patients. Once alloBMT is recommended, timing is a crucial consideration since delaying transplant can lead to disease progression and development of other comorbidities that may preclude transplant. Despite the success of alloBMT, relapse remains a major barrier to success and novel approaches are necessary to mitigate this risk and improve long term cure rates. This review describes various factors that should be considered when choosing patients with MDS who should pursue transplant, approaches and timing of transplant, and future directions of the field.

Since everyone has a donor, why are some eligible patients still not transplanted?

Hematopoietic cell transplantation is an important treatment option for malignant and non-malignant hematologic diseases. Despite increasing the potential donor pool for hematopoietic cell transplantation there are many patients who are unable to access this treatment. There are several biologic and non-biologic factors that may explain lower utilization of transplantation. Biologic factors associated with lower utilization include older age, multiple comorbidities, persons of African American descent and high-risk disease that may not respond optimally to hematopoietic cell transplantation. Non-biologic factors associated with lower utilization include lower educational (without a high school diploma) or social status, uninsured, Medicaid or Medicare insurance and in persons aged ≥60 years, when the distance between their residence and hospital was greater than 37 miles. The decision to proceed to hematopoietic cell transplantation is a dialogue between the patient and the treating physician. While some patients may be considered poor candidates for continued treatment including hematopoietic cell transplantation others may be offered novel pharmacologic and cellular therapies with a capacity to deliver specific immunologic antitumor responses. Pharmacologic and cellular therapies are relatively recent, and it is not known whether the biologic and non-biologic factors that limit access to transplantation will limit access to these newer treatments.

Outcome of Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Allografts Using Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Compared to Matched Sibling and Unrelated Donor Bone Marrow Allografts in Pediatric Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: A Single-Center Analysis

The introduction of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has made haploidentical (haplo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) a common approach in adults, but pediatric experience is limited. Based on the encouraging adult data and with the aim of decreasing the risk of graft failure, our center is increasingly using peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) from haplo donors with PTCy. Here we compare outcomes of bone marrow (BM) transplantation with traditional donor choices, including matched sibling donors (MSDs) and 10/10 HLA matched unrelated donors (MUDs), with those of haplo PBSC grafts in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies. In this retrospective single-center study, the primary endpoint was the comparison of GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS; defined as absence of acute GVHD [aGVHD] grade III-IV, relapse, death, or chronic GVHD [cGVHD] requiring systemic therapy) for the 3 cohorts. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and incidence of aGVHD and cGVHD). A total of 104 consecutive patients underwent first allogeneic (allo)-HSCT for a hematologic malignancy or myelodysplastic syndrome between January 2014 and December 2020 using a haplo family donor (PBSCs; n = 26), an MSD (BM; n = 31), or an MUD (BM; n = 47). Patient demographic and transplantation characteristics were not significantly different across the cohorts, apart from remission status, with the haplo cohort having more patients in third or later complete remission before HSCT (P < .01). The median duration of follow-up for the entire cohort was 573 days. The cumulative incidence of aGVHD (grade II-IV or grade III-IV) was not significantly different among the cohorts; however, the cumulative incidence of cGVHD at 18 months was highest in the MUD cohort (31.7%, versus 10.0% in the MSD cohort and 9.2% in the haplo cohort; P = .02). There were no differences in the 18-month cumulative incidence of relapse or NRM. OS and RFS at 18 months were 80.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.7% to 100%) and 73.8% (95% CI, 55.5% to 98.1%) for the haplo cohort, 83.4% (95% CI, 72.8% to 95.5%) and 70.3% (95% CI, 57.9% to 85.3%) for the MUD cohort, and 80.9% (95% CI, 66.9% to 97.7%) and 66.5% (95% CI, 50.5% to 87.5%) for the MSD cohort, with no statistically significant differences among the cohorts. GRFS at 18 months was 61% (95% CI, 43.3% to 85.9%) for the haplo cohort, 44.6% (95% CI, 31.8% to 62.5%) for the MUD cohort, and 62.1% (95% CI, 45.7% to 84.3%) for the MSD cohort (P = .26). Haploidentical PBSC HSCT with PTCy had comparable outcomes to MSD and MUD BM HSCT and less cGVHD compared with MUD BM HSCT in children. The logistical advantages and lower resource burden of haplo HSCT with PBSCs make it a feasible alternative to MUD HSCT in children with hematologic malignancies. Nonetheless, given that this is a retrospective comparison of transplantation platforms rather than donor types, further prospective studies are warranted. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.