Positron emission tomography in the diagnostic work-up of screening-detected lung nodules

A Nasal Swab Classifier to Evaluate the Probability of Lung Cancer in Patients With Pulmonary Nodules

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessment of the probability of lung cancer (pCA) is critical in patients with pulmonary nodules (PNs) to help guide decision-making. We sought to validate a clinical-genomic classifier developed using whole-transcriptome sequencing of nasal epithelial cells from patients with a PN ≤ 30 mm who smoke or have previously smoked.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can the pCA in individuals with a PN and a history of smoking be predicted by a classifier that uses clinical factors and genomic data from nasal epithelial cells obtained by cytologic brushing?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Machine learning was used to train a classifier using genomic and clinical features on 1,120 patients with PNs labeled as benign or malignant established by a final diagnosis or a minimum of 12 months of radiographic surveillance. The classifier was designed to yield low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories. The classifier was validated in an independent set of 312 patients, including 63 patients with a prior history of cancer (other than lung cancer), comparing the classifier prediction with the known clinical outcome.

RESULTS

In the primary validation set, sensitivity and specificity for low-risk classification were 96% and 42%, whereas sensitivity and specificity for high-risk classification was 58% and 90%, respectively. Sensitivity was similar across stages of non-small cell lung cancer, independent of subtype. Performance compared favorably with clinical-only risk models. Analysis of 63 patients with prior cancer showed similar performance as did subanalyses of patients with light vs heavy smoking burden and those eligible for lung cancer screening vs those who were not.

INTERPRETATION

The nasal classifier provides an accurate assessment of pCA in individuals with a PN ≤ 30 mm who smoke or have previously smoked. Classifier-guided decision-making could lead to fewer diagnostic procedures in patients without cancer and more timely treatment in patients with lung cancer.

Alleviation of Splenic Injury by CB001 after Low-Dose Irradiation Mediated by NLRP3/Caspase-1-BAX/Caspase-3 Axis

Low-dose radiation has been extensively employed in clinical practice, including tumor immunotherapy, chronic inflammation treatment and nidus screening. However, the damage on the spleen caused by low-dose radiation significantly increases the risk of late infection-related mortality, and there is currently no corresponding protective strategy. In the present study, a novel compound preparation named CB001 mainly constituted of Acanthopanax senticosus (AS) and Oldenlandia diffusa (OD) was developed to alleviate splenic injury caused by fractionated low-dose exposures. As our results show that, white pulp atrophy and the excessive apoptosis in spleen tissue induced by radiation exposure were significantly ameliorated by CB001. Mechanistically, BAX-caspase-3 signaling and nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich-repeat-containing family pyrin 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome signaling were demonstrated to be involved in the radio-protective activity of CB001 with the selective activators. Furthermore, the crosstalk between apoptosis signaling and NLRP3 inflammasome signaling in mediating the radio-protective activity of CB001 was clarified, in which the pro-apoptotic protein BAX but not the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl2 was found to be downstream of NLRP3. Our study demonstrated that the use of a novel drug product CB001 can potentially facilitate the alleviation of radiation-induced splenic injury for patients receiving medical imaging diagnosis or fractionated radiation therapy.

Utility of metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for simultaneously detecting pathogens and neoplasms

Objectives

Clinicians often face the challenge of differentially diagnosing febrile patients who are suspected of infectious diseases, since the clinical manifestations of infection and cancer may overlap. A single test that can detect both pathogens and tumor could provide timely and accurate diagnostic clues to aid the treatment and management of these patients.

Methods

We enrolled eight patients to evaluate the utility of metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for simultaneously detecting pathogens and neoplasms using body fluids and tissue samples. Patients were selected by the following criteria: 1) Tumor was not considered upon hospitalization, but mNGS testing indicated neoplasm; 2) Tumor was not excluded, but microbial infection was primarily suspected according to initial clinical assessment.

Results

We detected potential pathogens in five patients, three of whom had progressed into critical infections. Moreover, abnormal chromosomal copy numbers were identified in all patients that indicated presence of neoplasms, which were pathologically confirmed.

Conclusions

Although copy number variations do not render a definitive cancer diagnosis, it can prompt clinicians to conduct more focused diagnostic testing for cancer, potentially saving time and cost. As a result, integrating copy number analysis with pathogen detection in mNGS may help establish rapid and accurate diagnosis for febrile patients.

The Smokers Health Multiple ACtions (SMAC-1) Trial: Study Design and Results of the Baseline Round

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer screening with low-dose helical computed tomography (LDCT) reduces mortality in high-risk subjects. Cigarette smoking is linked to up to 90% of lung cancer deaths. Even more so, it is a key risk factor for many other cancers and cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. The Smokers health Multiple ACtions (SMAC-1) trial aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of an integrated program based on the early detection of smoking-related thoraco-cardiovascular diseases in high-risk subjects, combined with primary prevention. A new multi-component screening design was utilized to strengthen the framework on conventional lung cancer screening programs. We report here the study design and the results from our baseline round, focusing on oncological findings.

METHODS

High-risk subjects were defined as being >55 years of age and active smokers or formers who had quit within 15 years (>30 pack/y). A PLCOm2012 threshold >2% was chosen. Subject outreach was streamlined through media campaign and general practitioners' engagement. Eligible subjects, upon written informed consent, underwent a psychology consultation, blood sample collection, self-evaluation questionnaire, spirometry, and LDCT scan. Blood samples were analyzed for pentraxin-3 protein levels, interleukins, microRNA, and circulating tumor cells. Cardiovascular risk assessment and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring were performed. Direct and indirect costs were analyzed focusing on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life years gained in different scenarios. Personalized screening time-intervals were determined using the "Maisonneuve risk re-calculation model", and a threshold <0.6% was chosen for the biennial round.

RESULTS

In total, 3228 subjects were willing to be enrolled. Out of 1654 eligible subjects, 1112 participated. The mean age was 64 years (M/F 62/38%), with a mean PLCOm2012 of 5.6%. Former and active smokers represented 23% and 77% of the subjects, respectively. At least one nodule was identified in 348 subjects. LDCTs showed no clinically significant findings in 762 subjects (69%); thus, they were referred for annual/biennial LDCTs based on the Maisonneuve risk (mean value = 0.44%). Lung nodule active surveillance was indicated for 122 subjects (11%). Forty-four subjects with baseline suspicious nodules underwent a PET-FDG and twenty-seven a CT-guided lung biopsy. Finally, a total of 32 cancers were diagnosed, of which 30 were lung cancers (2.7%) and 2 were extrapulmonary cancers (malignant pleural mesothelioma and thymoma). Finally, 25 subjects underwent lung surgery (2.25%). Importantly, there were zero false positives and two false negatives with CT-guided biopsy, of which the patients were operated on with no stage shift. The final pathology included lung adenocarcinomas (69%), squamous cell carcinomas (10%), and others (21%). Pathological staging showed 14 stage I (47%) and 16 stage II-IV (53%) cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

LDCTs continue to confirm their efficacy in safely detecting early-stage lung cancer in high-risk subjects, with a negligible risk of false-positive results. Re-calculating the risk of developing lung cancer after baseline LDCTs with the Maisonneuve model allows us to optimize time intervals to subsequent screening. The Smokers health Multiple ACtions (SMAC-1) trial offers solid support for policy assessments by policymakers. We trust that this will help in developing guidelines for the large-scale implementation of lung cancer screening, paving the way for better outcomes for lung cancer patients.

Current and Future Perspectives on Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer: A Roadmap From 2023 to 2027 From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer substantially reduces mortality from lung cancer, as revealed in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. This review is based on the ninth CT screening symposium of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, which focuses on the major themes pertinent to the successful global implementation of LDCT screening and develops a strategy to further the implementation of lung cancer screening globally. These recommendations provide a 5-year roadmap to advance the implementation of LDCT screening globally, including the following: (1) establish universal screening program quality indicators; (2) establish evidence-based criteria to identify individuals who have never smoked but are at high-risk of developing lung cancer; (3) develop recommendations for incidentally detected lung nodule tracking and management protocols to complement programmatic lung cancer screening; (4) Integrate artificial intelligence and biomarkers to increase the prediction of malignancy in suspicious CT screen-detected lesions; and (5) standardize high-quality performance artificial intelligence protocols that lead to substantial reductions in costs, resource utilization and radiologist reporting time; (6) personalize CT screening intervals on the basis of an individual's lung cancer risk; (7) develop evidence to support clinical management and cost-effectiveness of other identified abnormalities on a lung cancer screening CT; (8) develop publicly accessible, easy-to-use geospatial tools to plan and monitor equitable access to screening services; and (9) establish a global shared education resource for lung cancer screening CT to ensure high-quality reading and reporting.

Imaging of lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Imaging is essential in the screening, diagnosis, staging, response assessment, and surveillance of patients with lung cancer. Subtypes of lung cancer can have distinguishing imaging appearances. The most frequently used imaging modalities include chest radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Artificial intelligence algorithms and radiomics are emerging technologies with potential applications in lung cancer imaging.

Detection efficacy of analog [18F]FDG PET/CT, digital [18F]FDG, and [13N]NH3 PET/CT: a prospective, comparative study of patients with lung adenocarcinoma featuring ground glass nodules

OBJECTIVES

This prospective study compared the detection efficacy of analog ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) (aF PET/CT), digital [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT (dF PET/CT), and digital ¹³N-ammonia (¹³N-NH₃) PET/CT (dN PET/CT) for patients with lung adenocarcinoma featuring ground glass nodules (GGNs).

METHODS

Eighty-seven patients with lung adenocarcinoma featuring GGNs who underwent dF and dN PET/CT were enrolled. Based on the GGN component, diameter, and solid-part size, 87 corresponding patients examined using aF PET/CT were included, with age, sex, and lesion characteristics closely matched. Images were visually evaluated, and the tumor to background ratio (TBR) was used for semi-quantitative analysis.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 40 and 47 patients with pure GGNs (pGGNs) and mixed GGNs (mGGNs), respectively, were included. dF PET/CT revealed more positive lesions and higher tracer uptake in GGNs than did aF PET/CT (53/87 vs. 26/87, p < 0.05; TBR: 3.08 ± 4.85 vs. 1.42 ± 0.93, p < 0.05), especially in mGGNs (44/47 vs. 26/47, p < 0.05; TBR: 4.48 ± 6.17 vs. 1.78 ± 1.16, p < 0.05). However, dN PET/CT detected more positive lesions than did dF PET/CT (71/87 vs. 53/87, p < 0.05), especially in pGGNs (24/40 vs. 9/40, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

dF PET/CT provides superior detection efficacy over aF PET/CT for patients with lung adenocarcinoma featuring GGNs, particularly mGGNs. dN PET/CT revealed superior detection efficacy over dF PET/CT, particularly in pGGNs. aF, dF, and dN PET/CT are valuable non-invasive examinations for lung cancer featuring GGNs, with dN PET/CT offering the best detection performance.

KEY POINTS

• Digital PET/CT provides superior detection efficacy over analog PET/CT in patients with lung adenocarcinoma featuring GGNs. • dN PET/CT can offer more help in the early detection of malignant GGN.

[Chinese Experts Consensus on Artificial Intelligence Assisted Management for Pulmonary Nodule (2022 Version)]

Low-dose computed tomography (CT) for lung cancer screening has been proven to reduce lung cancer deaths in the screening group compared with the control group. The increasing number of pulmonary nodules being detected by CT scans significantly increase the workload of the radiologists for scan interpretation. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to increase the efficiency of pulmonary nodule discrimination and has been tested in preliminary studies for nodule management. As more and more artificial AI products are commercialized, the consensus statement has been organized in a collaborative effort by Thoracic Surgery Committee, Department of Simulated Medicine, Wu Jieping Medical Foundation to aid clinicians in the application of AI-assisted management for pulmonary nodules.
.

Integrated Biomarkers for the Management of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules

Rationale: Patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) at risk of cancer undergo high rates of invasive, costly, and morbid procedures. Objectives: To train and externally validate a risk prediction model that combined clinical, blood, and imaging biomarkers to improve the noninvasive management of IPNs. Methods: In this prospectively collected, retrospective blinded evaluation study, probability of cancer was calculated for 456 patient nodules using the Mayo Clinic model, and patients were categorized into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. A combined biomarker model (CBM) including clinical variables, serum high sensitivity CYFRA 21-1 level, and a radiomic signature was trained in cohort 1 (n = 170) and validated in cohorts 2-4 (total n = 286). All patients were pooled to recalibrate the model for clinical implementation. The clinical utility of the CBM compared with current clinical care was evaluated in 2 cohorts. Measurements and Main Results: The CBM provided improved diagnostic accuracy over the Mayo Clinic model with an improvement in area under the curve of 0.124 (95% bootstrap confidence interval, 0.091-0.156; P < 2 × 10-16). Applying 10% and 70% risk thresholds resulted in a bias-corrected clinical reclassification index for cases and control subjects of 0.15 and 0.12, respectively. A clinical utility analysis of patient medical records estimated that a CBM-guided strategy would have reduced invasive procedures from 62.9% to 50.6% in the intermediate-risk benign population and shortened the median time to diagnosis of cancer from 60 to 21 days in intermediate-risk cancers. Conclusions: Integration of clinical, blood, and image biomarkers improves noninvasive diagnosis of patients with IPNs, potentially reducing the rate of unnecessary invasive procedures while shortening the time to diagnosis.

Frequent EGFR Mutations and Better Prognosis in Positron Emission Tomography-Negative, Solid-Type Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The differential diagnosis of a solitary solid-type lung nodule is diverse. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) has a high sensitivity in the diagnosis of solid-type lung cancers; however, PET-negative, solid-type lung cancers are rarely observed. In this study, we analyzed the clinical/genetic features and prognosis of PET-negative, solid-type lung cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2007 and February 2020, 709 patients with solid-type lung cancers (tumor size ≥2.0 cm) underwent pulmonary resection. Clinical, genetic, and prognostic features were evaluated in 27 patients (3.8%) with tumors showing negative PET results defined as SUVmax <2.0.

RESULTS

All 27 patients had lung adenocarcinoma; 23 had invasive adenocarcinomas and 4 had invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas. The PET-negative group showed high frequencies of females and never-smokers. Recurrence-free survival was significantly better in the PET-negative group compared with PET-positive counterparts extracted using propensity score matching from patients who underwent pulmonary resection during the same period (P = .0052). Furthermore, 83% of PET-negative, solid-type invasive lung adenocarcinoma patients harbored EGFR mutation, which was significantly higher than that of PET-positive, solid-type invasive lung adenocarcinoma patients (38%, n = 225) who received EGFR mutation testing in our cohort (P < .0001). PET-negative, solid-type lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations had significantly better recurrence-free survival compared with PET-positive, solid-type lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations extracted using propensity score matching (P = .0030).

CONCLUSION

PET-negative, solid-type lung cancers are characterized with a high incidence of EGFR mutation and a better prognosis compared with PET-positive, solid-type lung cancer.

Lung cancer screening: who pays? Who receives? The European perspectives

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and its early detection is critical to achieving a curative treatment and to reducing mortality. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a highly sensitive technique for detecting noninvasive small lung tumors in high-risk populations. We here analyze the current status of lung cancer screening (LCS) from a European point of view. With economic burden of health care in most European countries resting on the state, it is important to reduce costs of screening and improve its effectiveness. Current cost-effectiveness analyses on LCS have indicated a favorable economic profile. The most recently published analysis reported an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €3,297 per 1 life-year gained adjusted for the quality of life (QALY) and €2,944 per life-year gained, demonstrating a 90% probability of ICER being below €15,000 and a 98.1% probability of being below €25,000. Different risk models have been used to identify the target population; among these, the PLCOM2012 in particular allows for the selection of the population to be screened with high sensitivity. Risk models should also be employed to define screening intervals, which can reduce the general number of LDCT scans after the baseline round. Future perspectives of screening in a European scenario are related to the will of the policy makers to implement policy on a large scale and to improve the effectiveness of a broad screening of smoking-related disease, including cardiovascular prevention, by measuring coronary calcium score on LDCT. The employment of artificial intelligence (AI) in imaging interpretation, the use of liquid biopsies for the characterization of CT-detected undetermined nodules, and less invasive, personalized surgical treatments, will improve the effectiveness of LCS.

Managing of screening-detected sub-solid nodules-a European perspective

Since the National Lung Screening Trial in 2011 showed a 20% reduction in lung cancer mortality using annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), several randomised controlled trials and studies have been started in Europe. These include the Italian lung study (ITALUNG), the Dutch-Belgian lung cancer screening trial (NELSON), the UK lung cancer screening trial (UKLS), the Detection and screening of early lung cancer with novel imaging technology (DANTE), the Danish lung cancer screening trial (DLCST), the German lung cancer screening intervention trial (LUSI), the Multicentric Italian lung detection trial (MILD) and the CT screening for lung cancer study (COSMOS). As a result of the increasing number of screening trials and the growing utilization of LDCT, the high detection of subsolid nodules is an increasingly important clinical problem. In the last few years, several guidelines have been published and providing guidance on the optimal management of subsolid nodules, but many controversies still exist. Follow-up imaging plays an important role in clinical assessment and subsequent management of this particular type of lung nodules, since they can be transient inflammatory lesions, and if persistent they can be both benign lesions or lung cancers of variable clinical behaviour. However, the vast majority of subsolid nodules retain an indolent course over many years. The aim of this review is to present a European perspective in management of screening detected subsolid nodules.

Management of pulmonary ground-glass opacities: a position paper from a panel of experts of the Italian Society of Thoracic Surgery (SICT)

OBJECTIVES

A significant gap in our knowledge of how to manage pulmonary ground-glass opacities (GGOs) still exists. Accordingly, there is a lack of consensus among clinicians on this topic. The Italian Society of Thoracic Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Toracica, SICT) promoted a national expert meeting to provide insightful guidance for clinical practice. Our goal was to publish herein the final consensus document from this conference.

METHODS

The working panel of the PNR group (Pulmonary Nodules Recommendation Group, a branch of the SICT) together with 5 scientific supervisors (nominated by the SICT) identified a jury of expert thoracic surgeons who organized a multidisciplinary meeting to propose specific statements (n = 29); 73 participants discussed and voted on statements using a modified Delphi process (repeated iterations of anonymous voting over 2 rounds with electronic support) requiring 70% agreement to reach consensus on a statement.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on several critical points in GGO management, in particular on the definition of GGO, radiological and radiometabolic evaluation, indications for a non-surgical biopsy, GGO management based on radiological characteristics, surgical strategies (extension of pulmonary resection and lymphadenectomy) and radiological surveillance. A list of 29 statements was finally approved.

CONCLUSIONS

The participants at this national expert meeting analysed this challenging topic and provided a list of suggestions for health institutions and physicians with practical indications for GGO management.

Pulmonary nodule radiological diagnostic algorithm in lung cancer screening

Publications of the final results of the two largest randomized lung cancer screening (LCS) trials in the United States and Europe confirmed the reduction in the mortality rate associated with the use of screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). Results of these trials led to widespread acceptance of LCS in properly defined high-risk populations, and its implementation in the clinical practice. Many countries started preparation for national LCS and refreshed still open debate about lung nodule management. Detection of lung cancer in the early stage with a reduction of lung cancer mortality requires dedicated programs with optimized protocols, including a specified pulmonary nodule diagnostic algorithm. The screening protocol should be clear with a precise nodule diameter or volume threshold, based on which a positive screen result is defined. The application of risk-prediction models and the introduction of the semiautomated assessment of detected nodules improves screening accuracy and should be applied in LCS protocols as verified tools to aid radiological diagnosis. In this review, we have summarized recent data about the radiological protocols from the most important LCS programs and pulmonary diagnostic algorithms. These protocols should be taken into consideration in the ongoing and planned LCS programs.

Lung-RADS Version 1.1: Challenges and a Look Ahead, From the AJR Special Series on Radiology Reporting and Data Systems

In 2014, the American College of Radiology (ACR) created Lung-RADS 1.0. The system was updated to Lung-RADS 1.1 in 2019, and further updates are anticipated as additional data become available. Lung-RADS provides a common lexicon and standardized nodule follow-up management paradigm for use when reporting lung cancer screening (LCS) low-dose CT (LDCT) chest examinations and serves as a quality assurance and outcome monitoring tool. The use of Lung-RADS is intended to improve LCS performance and lead to better patient outcomes. To date, the ACR's Lung Cancer Screening Registry is the only LCS registry approved by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and requires the use of Lung-RADS categories for reimbursement. Numerous challenges have emerged regarding the use of Lung-RADS in clinical practice, including the timing of return to LCS after planned follow-up diagnostic evaluation; potential substitution of interval diagnostic CT for future LDCT; role of volumetric analysis in assessing nodule size; assessment of nodule growth; assessment of cavitary, subpleural, and category 4X nodules; and variability in reporting of the S modifier. This article highlights the major updates between versions 1.0 and 1.1 of Lung-RADS, describes the system's ongoing challenges, and summarizes current evidence and recommendations.

Management of Ground-Glass Opacities in the Lung Cancer Spectrum

BACKGROUND

Along with the popularity of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening, an increasing number of lung ground-glass opacity (GGO) lesions are detected. This review focuses on lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as GGO.

METHODS

We performed a literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE database to identify articles reporting GGO. The following terms were used: GGO, ground-glass opacity, GGN, ground-glass nodule, part-solid nodule, and subsolid nodule.

RESULTS

GGO is a nonspecific radiologic finding showing a hazy opacity without blocking underlying pulmonary vessels or bronchial structures. The pathology of GGO can be benign, preinvasive, or invasive adenocarcinoma. Although radiographic features may indicate malignancy, a short period of follow-up is the optimal method to distinguish between benign and malignant GGO lesions. Pathologically, not only lepidic, but also nonlepidic growth patterns can present as GGO. Lung adenocarcinoma with a GGO component is associated with excellent survival compared with solid lesions. Moreover, there are distinct prognostic factors in patients with lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as GGO or solid lesions. For selected GGO-featured lung adenocarcinoma, sublobar resection with selective or no mediastinal lymph node dissection may be sufficient. Intraoperative frozen section is an effective method to guide resection strategy. A less intensive postoperative surveillance strategy may be more appropriate given the excellent survival. Management of multiple GGO lesions requires comprehensive considerations of GGO characteristics and patient conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as GGO defines a special clinical subtype with excellent prognosis. The management of GGO-featured lung adenocarcinoma should be distinct from that of solid lesions.

Radioguided Surgery, a Cost-Effective Strategy for Treating Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: 20-Year Experience of a Single Center

INTRODUCTION

Surgical resection with minimally invasive approach is the gold standard for both definitive diagnosis and treatment of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs); however, it can be difficult to pinpoint small, deep, or subsolid nodes without palpating lung parenchyma. The primary endpoint of this study is showing that radioguided surgery is a cost-effective strategy to improve the effectiveness of video-thoracoscopic localization/resection of SPNs/ground-glass opacities (GGOs). Secondary endpoints are analyzing the morbidity of this technique and tips and tricks to better manage this method.

METHODS

SPN smaller than 20 mm and/or with a distance from the visceral pleura ≥5 mm underwent minimally invasive resection after computed tomography-guided injection of a solution composed of 0.1/0.2 mL of 99Tc-labeled human serum albumin microspheres and 0.1 mL of nonionic contrast. In the operating theater, a collimated probe connected to a gamma ray detector allowed localization of the target area.

RESULTS

Between 1997 and 2018, a total of 451 patients with SPN/GGO underwent minimally invasive surgery with a radioguided technique at our hospital. The mean SPN diameter was 13 mm (range, 5-20 mm), and the mean distance from the visceral pleura was 15 mm (range, 6-29 mm). The mean time to a localizing nodule was 3 minutes (range, 1-5 minutes). No significant injection-related complications were reported; only 3.3% of patients (15 of 451) developed pneumothorax. Both 30- to 60-day and 90-day mortality were 0%. The rate of postoperative complications was 2.53% (prolonged air leak). The conversion rate to thoracotomy was 1.55% (7 of 451).

CONCLUSIONS

Our 20-year experience shows that radioguided thoracoscopic surgery is a safe and feasible strategy to treat suspicious SPN/GGO, with a success rate of 98%.

[18F-FDG PET/CT manifestations of massive type active pulmonary tuberculosis and its differentiation from lung cancer]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate 18F-FDG PET/CT manifestations of massive type active tuberculosis and lung cancer and the differential diagnosis of the two diseases based on 18F-FDG PET/CT findings.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the data from 74 patients with active tuberculosis and 64 patients with lung cancer, whose lesions presented as solid masses on CT. The demographic and clinical data of the patients, 18F-FDG PET characteristics including SUVmax, 18F-FDG uptake (higher than mediastinal blood pool or not), radioactive defect within the lesion, and the CT findings including the lesion size, signs of cavity, vacuoles, lobulation, smooth border, and mediastinal/lung window ratio (M/L ratio) of the lesions were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare the variables between the two groups, and a logistic regression model was established for differentiation of the two diseases. The diagnostic efficiency was evaluated by area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in the quantitative index (SUVmax >2.5 or not) or in the qualitative index (uptake of lesion higher than mediastinal blood pool or not) in PET between massive type active tuberculosis and lung cancer (P>0.05). Univariate analysis revealed that SUVmax, 18F-FDG uptake of the lesion, age, lesion size, signs of cavity, or M/L ratio were not significantly different (P>0.05), but gender, signs of radioactive defect, vacuoles, smooth border and lobulation were significantly different (P < 0.05) between the two diseases. Multivariate analysis showed that gender, signs of radioactive defect, smooth border and lobulation of the lesion were independent factors for discrimination of the two diseases (P < 0.05). A risk prediction model for active tuberculosis was established based on logistic regression analysis: P=1/(1+e-x), X=-0.530+1.978×gender+3.343×radioactive defect +2.846×smooth border-2.116×lobulation. For diagnosis of active tuberculosis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of this model were 78.4%, 92.2%, 84.8%, 92.1%, and 78.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined analysis of gender, signs of radioactive defect, smooth border and lobulation of the lesions is useful for discriminating massive type active tuberculosis from lung cancer in the majority of the patients, whereas 18F-FDG uptake alone has only limited value for a differential diagnosis.

Diagnosis and management of peripheral lung nodule

A solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is a well-defined radiographic opacity up to 3 cm in diameter that is surrounded by unaltered aerated lung. Frequently, it is an incidental finding on chest radiographs and chest CT scans. Determining the probability of malignancy is the first step in the evaluation of SPN. This can be done by looking at specific risk factors and the rate of radiographic progression. Subsequent management is guided by the type of the nodule. Patients with solid nodules and low pretest probability can be followed radiographically; those with high probability, who are good surgical candidates, can be referred for surgical resection. When the pretest probability is in the intermediate range additional testing such as biopsy should be done. Various modalities are now available to obtain tissue diagnosis. These modalities differ in their yield and complication rate. Patients with SPN should be well informed of each approach's risks and benefits and should be able to make an informed decision regarding the different diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.

Lung nodules: A comprehensive review on current approach and management

In daily clinical practice, radiologists and pulmonologists are faced with incidental radiographic findings of pulmonary nodules. Deciding how to manage these findings is very important as many of them may be benign and require no further action, but others may represent early disease and importantly early-stage lung cancer and require prompt diagnosis and definitive treatment. As the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules includes invasive procedures which can be relatively minimal, such as bronchoscopy or transthoracic aspiration or biopsy, but also more invasive procedures such as thoracic surgical biopsies, and as these procedures are linked to anxiety and to cost, it is important to have clearly defined algorithms for the description, management, and follow-up of these nodules. Clear algorithms for the imaging protocols and the management of positive findings should also exist in lung cancer screening programs, which are already established in the USA and which will hopefully be established worldwide. This article reviews current knowledge on nodule definition, diagnostic evaluation, and management based on literature data and mainly recent guidelines.

Improved discrimination between benign and malignant LDCT screening-detected lung nodules with dynamic over static 18F-FDG PET as a function of injected dose

Lung cancer mortality rate can be significantly reduced by up to 20% through routine low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, which, however, has high sensitivity but low specificity, resulting in a high rate of false-positive nodules. Combining PET with CT may provide more accurate diagnosis for indeterminate screening-detected nodules. In this work, we investigated low-dose dynamic 18F-FDG PET in discrimination between benign and malignant nodules using a virtual clinical trial based on patient study with ground truth. Six patients with initial LDCT screening-detected lung nodules received 90 min single-bed PET scans following a 10 mCi FDG injection. Low-dose static and dynamic images were generated from under-sampled list-mode data at various count levels (100%, 50%, 10%, 5%, and 1%). A virtual clinical trial was performed by adding nodule population variability, measurement noise, and static PET acquisition start time variability to the time activity curves (TACs) of the patient data. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to estimate the classification capability of standardized uptake value (SUV) and net uptake constant K i from their simulated benign and malignant distributions. Various scan durations and start times (t *) were investigated in dynamic Patlak analysis to optimize simplified acquisition protocols with a population-based input function (PBIF). The area under curve (AUC) of ROC analysis was higher with increased scan duration and earlier t *. Highly similar results were obtained using PBIF to those using image-derived input function (IDIF). The AUC value for K i using optimized t * and scan duration with 10% dose was higher than that for SUV with 100% dose. Our results suggest that dynamic PET with as little as 1 mCi FDG could provide discrimination between benign and malignant lung nodules with higher than 90% sensitivity and specificity for patients similar to the pilot and simulated population in this study, with LDCT screening-detected indeterminate lung nodules.

Benefits of respiratory-gated 18F-FDG PET acquisition in lung disease

BACKGROUND

Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) is a reliable imaging modality for the diagnosis of malignant lung nodules and to assess the latter's prognosis. However, physiological respiratory motion deteriorates PET images and thus decreases the technique's diagnostic and prognostic values. This issue can be overcome by applying respiratory gating to the F-FDG PET/CT acquisitions.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of respiratory-gated F-FDG PET/CT to diagnose malignant lung nodules and to predict recurrence and patient survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 103 prospectively enrolled patients with solid lung nodules underwent both ungated and gated F-FDG PET/CT acquisitions. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was used to differentiate benign from malignant nodules. Patients have been followed up for at least 36 months to confirm imaging results and assess survival.

RESULTS

Gated F-FDG PET/CT was significantly more sensitive than ungated PET/CT for the diagnosis of malignant lung nodules located in the lower lobes (92 vs. 58%; P<0.001) and in patients aged older than 60 years (73 vs. 48%; P<0.001). The same gain was observed for stage I cancers with tumors from 10 to 20 mm. When considering patients aged older than 60 years, those with a low SUVmax on gated PET images had a significantly higher 3-year disease-free survival rate than those with a high SUVmax (76 vs. 47%; P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

F-FDG PET/CT is advisable for the assessment of lung nodules in patients aged older than 60 years and/or in the lower lobes.

Cost-effectiveness of an autoantibody test (EarlyCDT-Lung) as an aid to early diagnosis of lung cancer in patients with incidentally detected pulmonary nodules

OBJECTIVE

Patients who have incidentally detected pulmonary nodules and an estimated intermediate risk (5-60%) of lung cancer frequently are followed via computed tomography (CT) surveillance to detect nodule growth, despite guidelines for a more aggressive diagnostic strategy. We examined the cost-effectiveness of an autoantibody test (AABT)-Early Cancer Detection Test-Lung (EarlyCDT-LungTM)-as an aid to early diagnosis of lung cancer among such patients.

METHODS

We developed a decision-analytic model to evaluate use of the AABT versus CT surveillance alone. In the model, patients with a positive AABT-because they are at substantially enhanced risk of lung cancer-are assumed to go directly to biopsy, resulting in diagnosis of lung cancer in earlier stages than under current guidelines (a beneficial stage shift). Patients with a negative AABT, and those scheduled for CT surveillance alone, are assumed to have periodic CT screenings to detect rapid growth and thus to have their lung cancers diagnosed-on average-at more advanced stages.

RESULTS

Among 1,000 patients who have incidentally detected nodules 8-30 mm, have an intermediate-risk of lung cancer, and are evaluated by CT surveillance alone, 95 (9.5%) are assumed to have lung cancer (local, 73.6%; regional, 22.0%; distant, 4.4%). With use of the AABT set at a sensitivity/specificity of 41%/93% (stage shift = 10.8%), although expected costs would be higher by $949,442 ($949 per person), life years would be higher by 53 (0.05 per person), resulting in a cost per life-year gained of $18,029 and a cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of $24,330. With use of the AABT set at a sensitivity/specificity of 28%/98% (stage shift = 7.4%), corresponding cost-effectiveness ratios would be $18,454 and $24,833.

CONCLUSIONS

Under our base-case assumptions, and reasonable variations thereof, using AABT as an aid in the early diagnosis of lung cancer in patients with incidentally detected pulmonary nodules who are estimated to be at intermediate risk of lung cancer and are scheduled for CT surveillance alone is likely to be a cost-effective use of healthcare resources.

EU Policy on Lung Cancer CT Screening 2017

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer kills more Europeans than any other cancer. In 2013, 269,000 citizens of the EU-28 died from this disease. Lung cancer CT screening has the potential to detect lung cancer at an early stage and improve mortality. All of the randomised controlled trials and cohort low-dose CT (LDCT) screening trials across the world have identified very early stage disease (∼70%); the majority of these LDCT trial patients were suitable for surgical interventions and had a good clinical outcome. The 10-year survival in CT screen-detected cancer was shown to be even higher than the 5-year survival for early stage disease in clinical practice at 88%.

METHODS

Setting up of an EU Commission expert group can be done under Article 168(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to develop policy and recommendation for Lung cancer CT screening. The Expert Group would undertake: (a) assist the Commission in the drawing up policy documents, including guidelines and recommendations; (b) advise the Commission in the implementation of Union actions on screening and suggest improvements to the measures taken; (c) advise the Commission in the monitoring, evaluation and dissemination of the results of measures taken at Union and national level.

RESULTS

This EU Expert Group on lung cancer screening should be set up by the EU Commission to support the implementation and suggest recommendations for the lung cancer screening policy by 2019/2020.

CONCLUSION

Reduce lung cancer in Europe by undertaking a well-organised lung cancer CT screening programme.

Lung Cancer Diagnosis by Fine Needle Aspiration Is Associated With Reduction in Resection of Nonmalignant Lung Nodules

BACKGROUND

The rates of resection of nonmalignant lung nodules suspected preoperatively to be lung cancer vary widely and are reported to be as high as 40%. We determined the impact of the frequent use of computed tomography (CT)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) on the resection rate of nonmalignant nodules and frequency of resections of benign disease among patients undergoing evaluation for lung cancer resection operation in an academic medical center.

METHODS

Eligible patients underwent CT-guided FNA, surgical resection, or both during the 12-month period between July 2013 and July 2014 for known or suspected first primary resectable stage I-III lung cancer. Patient data were extracted from the electronic medical records.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-seven patients underwent surgical resection; among them the overall resection rate of nonmalignant lesions was 13.1% (26/197). For those with preoperative FNA, the rate was 7.9% (11/139), and for those with no biopsy, the rate was 25.9% (15/58) (p = 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of FNA biopsy were 96% and 98%, respectively. The false-negative rate was 3.9% (5/128).

CONCLUSIONS

The resection rate of nonmalignant nodules was significantly lower for patients with preoperative CT-guided FNA biopsy than in those without. The diagnostic accuracy of FNA in these patients at moderate to high risk for lung cancer is higher than that of positron emission tomography, with a low rate of adverse events. These findings suggest that the frequent use of preoperative diagnostic confirmation by FNA results in a low rate of nonmalignant resection.

Recommendations from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) regarding computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Europe

In order to provide recommendations regarding implementation of computed tomography (CT) screening in Europe the ESTS established a working group with eight experts in the field. On a background of the current situation regarding CT screening in Europe and the available evidence, ten recommendations have been prepared that cover the essential aspects to be taken into account when considering implementation of CT screening in Europe. These issues are: (i) Implementation of CT screening in Europe, (ii) Participation of thoracic surgeons in CT screening programs, (iii) Training and clinical profile for surgeons participating in screening programs, (iv) the use of minimally invasive thoracic surgery and other relevant surgical issues and (v) Associated elements of CT screening programs (i.e. smoking cessation programs, radiological interpretation, nodule evaluation algorithms and pathology reports). Thoracic Surgeons will play a key role in this process and therefore the ESTS is committed to providing guidance and facilitating this process for the benefit of patients and surgeons.

Implementation and organization of lung cancer screening

CT screening for lung cancer is now being implemented in the US and China on a widespread national scale but not in Europe so far. The review gives a status for the implementation process and the hurdles to overcome in the future. It also describes the guidelines and requirements for the structure and components of high quality CT screening programs. These are essential in order to achieve a successful program with the fewest possible harms and a possible mortality benefit like that documented in the American National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). In addition the importance of continued research in CT screening methods is described and discussed with focus on the great potential to further improve this method in the future for the benefit of patients and society.

Assessment of indeterminate pulmonary nodules detected in lung cancer screening: Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET/CT

BACKGROUND

A major drawback of lung cancer screening programs is the high frequency of false-positive findings on computed tomography (CT). We investigated the accuracy of selective 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) scan in assessing radiologically indeterminate lung nodules detected in lung cancer screening.

METHODS

FDG PET/CT was performed to characterize 64 baseline lung nodules >10mm and 36 incidence nodules detected on low-dose CT screening in asymptomatic current or former smokers (83 men, age range 40-83 years) at high risk for lung cancer. CT images were acquired without intravenous contrast. Nodules were analyzed by size, density, and metabolic activity and visual scored on a 5-point scale for FDG uptake. Nodules were classified as negative for malignancy when no FDG uptake was observed, or positive when focal uptake was observed in the visual analysis, and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured. Final diagnosis was based on histopathological evaluation or at least 24 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 100 nodules were included. The prevalence of lung cancer was 1%. The sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of visual analysis to detect malignancy were 84%, 95%, 91%, and 91%, respectively, with an accuracy of 91% (AUC 0.893). FDG PET/CT accurately detected 31 malignant tumors (diameters 9-42mm, SUVmax range 0.6-14.2) and was falsely negative in 6 patients. With SUVmax thresholds for malignancy of 1.5, 2, and 2.5, specificity was 97% but sensitivity decreased to 65%, 49%, and 46% respectively, and accuracy decreased to 85%, 79%, and 78% respectively (AUC 0.872).

CONCLUSIONS

The visual analysis of FDG PET/CT scan is highly accurate in characterizing indeterminate pulmonary nodules detected in lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. Semi-quantitative analysis does not improve the accuracy of FDG PET/CT over that obtained with a qualitative method for lung nodule characterization.

The challenge of small lung nodules identified in CT screening: can biomarkers assist diagnosis?

Various biomarkers have been developed as noninvasive tests to indicate the presence of lung cancer in asymptomatic persons, and in particular to provide evidence as to whether indeterminate lung nodules detected by screening are malignant. We performed an overview of the range of biomarkers reported in the literature and described those that can complement low-dose computed tomography screening. Several have promising sensitivity and specificity. However to our knowledge, only three techniques have reached the prospective screening phase (phase 4) of the five-phase biomarker development process. Two miRNA signatures (the miR-Test for serum and the miRNA signature classifier test for plasma) are being assessed in prospective screening trials, as is the EarlyCDT-Lung test based on autoantibodies. All will need to undergo prospective studies to determine their ability to improve outcomes before they can become an established adjunct to lung cancer control strategies.