Smoking-related idiopathic interstitial pneumonia

Smoking-Related Interstitial Lung Disease: Historical Perspective and Advances in the Twenty-first Century

In the twenty- first century, there is widespread agreement that in addition to lung cancer, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis, cigarette smoking causes accumulation of pigmented macrophages, interstitial fibrosis, and Langerhans cell proliferation in various permutations. These histologic changes remain subclinical in some patients and produce clinical manifestations and imaging abnormalities in others. Debate surrounds terminology of these lesions, which are often grouped together under the umbrella of "smoking-related interstitial lung disease." This review summarizes modern concepts in our understanding of these abnormalities and explains how the recognition of smoking-related interstitial fibrosis has advanced the field.

The Association between Exposures and Disease Characteristics in Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis

Rationale: Heterogeneous characteristics are observed in familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF), suggesting that nongenetic factors contribute to disease manifestations. Objectives: To determine the relationship between environmental exposures and disease characteristics of FPF, including the morphological characteristics on chest computed tomography (CT) scan, and timing of FPF symptom onset, lung transplantation, or death. Methods: Subjects with FPF with an exposure questionnaire and chest CT were selected from a prospective cohort at Vanderbilt. Disease characteristics were defined by lung parenchymal findings on chest CT associated with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) or usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and by time from birth to symptom onset or a composite of lung transplantation or death. After assessing the potential for confounding by sex or smoking, adjusted logistic or Cox proportional hazards regression models identified exposures associated with fHP or UIP CT findings. Findings were validated in a cohort of patients with sporadic pulmonary fibrosis enrolled in the LTRC (Lung Tissue Research Consortium) study. Results: Among 159 subjects with FPF, 98 (61.6%) were males and 96 (60.4%) were ever-smokers. Males were less likely to have CT features of fHP, including mosaic attenuation (FPF: adjusted [for sex and smoking] odds ratio [aOR], 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.76; P = 0.01; LTRC: aOR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.61; P = 0.0002). Organic exposures, however, were not consistently associated with fHP features in either cohort. Smoking was a risk factor for honeycombing in both cohorts (FPF: aOR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.12-4.28; P = 0.02; LTRC: aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.22-2.33; P = 0.002). Rock dust exposure may also be associated with honeycombing, although the association was not statistically-significant when accounting for sex and smoking (FPF: aOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 0.997-5.15; P = 0.051; LTRC: aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.97-2.33; P = 0.07). In the FPF cohort, ever-smokers experienced a shorter transplant-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.07-2.52; P = 0.02), whereas sex was not associated with differential survival (male adjusted hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.50-1.14; P = 0.18). Conclusions: In FPF, smoking contributes to shortened transplant-free survival and development of honeycombing, a finding that is also likely applicable to sporadic pulmonary fibrosis. Females are more likely to manifest CT features of fHP (mosaic attenuation), a finding that was incompletely explained by sex differences in exposures. These findings may have implications for pulmonary fibrosis classification and management.

SER-SEPAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease. Part 1: Epidemiology, risk factors and prognosis

OBJECTIVE

To develop multidisciplinary recommendations to improve the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).

METHODS

Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified by a panel of rheumatologists and pneumologists selected based on their experience in the field. Systematic reviews of the available evidence were conducted, and evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria. Specific recommendations were made.

RESULTS

Six PICO questions were selected, three of which analysed the incidence and prevalence of RA-ILD, associated risk factors, and predictors of progression and mortality. A total of 6 specific recommendations on these topics, structured by question, were formulated based on the evidence found and/or expert consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the first official SER-SEPAR document with specific recommendations for RA-ILD management developed to resolve some common clinical questions and facilitate decision-making for patients.

Demystifying idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: time for more etiology-focused nomenclature in interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

A major focus of interstitial lung disease (ILD) has centered on disorders termed idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) which include, among others, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, and respiratory bronchiolitis-interstitial lung disease.

AREAS COVERED

We review the radiologic and histologic patterns for the nine disorders classified by multidisciplinary approach as IIP, and describe the remarkable amount of published epidemiologic, translational, and molecular studies demonstrating their associations with numerous yet definitive environmental exposures, occupational exposures, pulmonary diseases, systemic diseases, medication toxicities, and genetic variants.

EXPERT OPINION

In the 21st century, these disorders termed IIPs are rarely idiopathic, but rather are well-described radiologic and histologic patterns of lung injury that are associated with a wide array of diverse etiologies. Accordingly, the idiopathic nomenclature is misleading and confusing, and may also promote a lack of inquisitiveness, suggesting the end rather than the beginning of a thorough diagnostic process to identify ILD etiology and initiate patient-centered management. A shift toward more etiology-focused nomenclature will be beneficial to all, including patients hoping for better life quality and disease outcome, general medicine and pulmonary physicians furthering their ILD knowledge, and expert ILD clinicians and researchers who are advancing the ILD field.

Sex and gender in interstitial lung diseases

Sex and gender differences influence key domains of research, lung health, healthcare access and healthcare delivery. In interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), mouse models of pulmonary fibrosis are clearly influenced by sex hormones. Additionally, short telomeres, a biomarker of telomere regulation gene mutations, are impacted by sex, while heritability unexplained by genetic variation may be attributable to gendered environmental factors that drive epigenetic control. Diseases like idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, occupational ILDs, connective tissue-associated ILDs and lymphangioleiomyomatosis have different prevalence and prognosis between men and women. These differences arise from a complex interplay between biological sex and sociocultural gender influencing genetics, epigenomic modifiers, hormones, immune function, response to treatment and interaction with healthcare systems. Much work remains to be done to systematically integrate sex and gender analysis into relevant domains of science and clinical care in ILD, from strategic considerations for establishing research priorities to guidelines for establishing best clinical practices. Accounting for sex and gender in ILD is essential to the practice of individualised, patient-centred medicine.

Pathological and clinical relevance of selective recruitment of Langerhans cells in the respiratory bronchioles of smokers

BACKGROUND

Smoking causes an influx of inflammatory cells including Langerhans cells (LCs) into the airways and lung parenchyma, thus inducing histological changes, such as emphysema and fibrosis. We examined the distribution and quantity of Langerhans cells in relation to clinical and pathological findings and explored the association between smoking and accumulation of Langerhans cells in the respiratory bronchioles.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients who underwent lung resection for primary diseases, including lung cancer, were recruited. Histological and immunohistochemistry analyses were utilized to identify CD1a-positive Langerhans cells in peripheral lung specimens separated from primary lesions. Clinical characteristics, pathological changes, and distribution of CD1a-positive Langerhans cells distribution were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 53 patients, 35 were smokers and 18 were non-smokers. The number of Langerhans cells in the respiratory bronchioles was significantly increased in smokers as compared to that in non-smokers (p < 0.001). The number of Langerhans cells in smokers was significantly higher in patients with mild emphysema than in those without emphysema (p < 0.01). The high-LC group showed more frequent smoking-related histological changes, such as respiratory bronchiolitis, parenchymal fibrosis, accumulation of macrophages, and smoking-related interstitial fibrosis, than the low-LC group. However, there were no differences in the smoking indices and pulmonary functions of the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective accumulation of Langerhans cells in the respiratory bronchioles of smokers may lead to the development of smoking-related pathological changes.

A comprehensive assessment of environmental exposures and the medical history guides multidisciplinary discussion in interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) is widely recommended for patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), but published primary data from MDD has been scarce, and factors influencing MDD other than chest computed tomography (CT) and lung histopathology interpretations have not been well-described.

METHODS

Single institution MDD of 179 patients with ILD.

RESULTS

MDD consensus clinical diagnoses included autoimmune-related ILD, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, smoking-related ILD, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, medication-induced ILD, occupation-related ILD, unclassifiable ILD, and a few less common pulmonary disorders. In 168 of 179 patients, one or more environmental exposures or pertinent features of the medical history were identified, including recreational/avocational, residential, and occupational exposures, systemic autoimmune disease, malignancy, medication use, and family history. The MDD process demonstrated the importance of comprehensively assessing these exposures and features, beyond merely noting their presence, for rendering consensus clinical diagnoses. Precise, well-defined chest CT and lung histopathology interpretations were rendered at MDD, including usual interstitial pneumonia, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, and organizing pneumonia, but these interpretations were associated with a variety of MDD consensus clinical diagnoses, demonstrating their nonspecific nature in many instances. In 77 patients in which MDD consensus diagnosis differed from referring diagnosis, assessment of environmental exposures and medical history was found retrospectively to be the most impactful factor.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive assessment of environmental exposures and pertinent features of the medical history guided MDD. In addition to rendering consensus clinical diagnoses, MDD presented clinicians with opportunities to initiate environmental remediation, behavior modification, or medication alteration likely to benefit individual patients with ILD.

Five simple reasons to discard DIP, or why we should stop calling dolphins big fish

The aim of this review is to explain why the term 'desquamative interstitial pneumonia' (DIP) should be discarded and replaced with modern terminology. Reason 1: DIP is a misnomer. Within a few years after the term was coined, it was shown that the airspace cells in DIP are macrophages not desquamated pneumocytes. Reason 2: As a result of overly simplistic and poorly defined histologic criteria, DIP is currently a mixed bag of smoking-related diseases and unrelated processes in never-smokers. Reason 3: DIP obfuscates the modern concept that smoking causes some forms of parenchymal lung disease. Despite the fact that >80% of cases of DIP are caused by smoking, it is currently classified as a 'smoking-related idiopathic interstitial pneumonia', an oxymoron. Reason 4: The premise that the presence of numerous macrophages within airspaces defines an entity creates problematic histologic overlap with other lung diseases that may feature prominent airspace macrophages. Reason 5: DIP is outdated. It was coined in 1965, when many entities in interstitial lung disease had not been described, smoking-related interstitial lung disease was an unknown concept, computed tomograms of the chest had not been introduced and immunohistochemistry was unavailable. We suggest a way forward, which includes eliminating the term DIP and separating smoking-related lung abnormalities (including accumulation of pigmented airspace macrophages) from cases characterised by numerous non-pigmented macrophages in never-smokers. The laudable goal of smoking cessation is not served well by muddying the relationship between smoking and lung disease with inaccurate, outdated terminology.

Interstitial lung abnormalities detected incidentally on CT: a Position Paper from the Fleischner Society

The term interstitial lung abnormalities refers to specific CT findings that are potentially compatible with interstitial lung disease in patients without clinical suspicion of the disease. Interstitial lung abnormalities are increasingly recognised as a common feature on CT of the lung in older individuals, occurring in 4-9% of smokers and 2-7% of non-smokers. Identification of interstitial lung abnormalities will increase with implementation of lung cancer screening, along with increased use of CT for other diagnostic purposes. These abnormalities are associated with radiological progression, increased mortality, and the risk of complications from medical interventions, such as chemotherapy and surgery. Management requires distinguishing interstitial lung abnormalities that represent clinically significant interstitial lung disease from those that are subclinical. In particular, it is important to identify the subpleural fibrotic subtype, which is more likely to progress and to be associated with mortality. This multidisciplinary Position Paper by the Fleischner Society addresses important issues regarding interstitial lung abnormalities, including standardisation of the definition and terminology; predisposing risk factors; clinical outcomes; options for initial evaluation, monitoring, and management; the role of quantitative evaluation; and future research needs.

Smoking-Related Diffuse Cystic Lung Disease

Exposure to cigarette smoke can lead to a variety of parenchymal lung diseases, including diffuse cystic lung diseases (DCLDs). Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is the prototypical DCLD and has a characteristic appearance on high-resolution CT (HRCT). We present a series of four patients with DCLD on HRCT who were referred to our institution with a presumed diagnosis of LAM and who were found instead to have smoking-related injury of the small airways on histopathological analysis. We submit that cigarette smoke-induced small airway injury can present as DCLD on HRCT in a pattern that can mimic LAM. A detailed history of cigarette smoke exposure should be obtained in patients presenting with DCLD, and imaging features should not be used in isolation to establish a firm diagnosis of LAM.

Interstitial Lung Disease and Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Practical Approach for General Medicine Physicians with Focus on the Medical History

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) and pulmonary fibrosis comprise a wide array of inflammatory and fibrotic lung diseases which are often confusing to general medicine and pulmonary physicians alike. In addition to the myriad of clinical and radiologic nomenclature used in ILD, histopathologic descriptors may be particularly confusing, and are often extrapolated to radiologic imaging patterns which may further add to the confusion. We propose that rather than focusing on precise histologic findings, focus should be on identifying an accurate etiology of ILD through a comprehensive and detailed medical history. Histopathologic patterns from lung biopsy should not be dismissed, but are often nonspecific, and overall treatment strategy and prognosis are likely to be determined more by the specific etiology of ILD rather than any particular histologic pattern. In this review, we outline a practical approach to common ILDs, highlight important aspects in obtaining an exposure history, clarify terminology and nomenclature, and discuss six common subgroups of ILD likely to be encountered by general medicine physicians in the inpatient or outpatient setting: Smoking-related, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, connective tissue disease-related, occupation-related, medication-induced, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Accurate diagnosis of these forms of ILD does require supplementing the medical history with results of the physical examination, autoimmune serologic testing, and chest radiographic imaging, but the importance of a comprehensive environmental, avocational, occupational, and medication-use history cannot be overstated and is likely the single most important factor responsible for achieving the best possible outcomes for patients.

The diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current and future approaches

With the recent development of two effective treatments for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, an accurate diagnosis is crucial. The traditional approach to diagnosis emphasises the importance of thorough clinical and laboratory evaluations to exclude secondary causes of disease. High-resolution CT is a critical initial diagnostic test and acts as a tool to identify patients who should undergo surgical lung biopsy to secure a definitive histological diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia pattern. This diagnostic approach faces several challenges. Many patients with suspected idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis present with atypical high-resolution CT characteristics but are unfit for surgical lung biopsy, therefore preventing a confident diagnosis. The state of the art suggests an iterative, multidisciplinary process that incorporates available clinical, laboratory, imaging, and histological features. Recent research has explored genomic techniques to molecularly phenotype patients with interstitial lung disease. In the future, clinicians will probably use blood-specific or lung-specific molecular markers in combination with other clinical, physiological, and imaging features to enhance diagnostic efforts, refine prognostic recommendations, and influence the initial or subsequent treatment options. There is an urgent and increasing need for well designed, large, prospective studies measuring the effect of different diagnostic approaches. Ultimately, this will help to inform the development of guidelines and tailor clinical practice for the benefit of patients.

A confusing case report of pulmonary langerhans cell histiocytosis and literature review

Pulmonary Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (PLCH) is a rare disease. From the insidious onset and nonspecific manifestations, it is difficult to diagnose PLCH. To help improve the diagnosis and therapy options of adult PLCH, we present this case report and literature review about a confusing case of PLCH. In this report, we present a 37-year-old male PLCH case that was negative for CD1a and S100 expression. Smoking cessation and use of prescribed Spiriva appeared to improve the patient’s symptoms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of PLCH in which improved symptoms were seen with the use of Spiriva alone.The mechanism is not clear, but potentially has some relationship with dilating the airway, decreasing the mucous hypersecretion and promoting anti-inflammatory pathways. From this patient’s case, we may be able to find more cases to then find other first line therapies for PLCH patients.

Smoking and interstitial lung diseases

For many years has been well known that smoking could cause lung damage. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer have been the two most common smoking-related lung diseases. In the recent years, attention has also focused on the role of smoking in the development of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Indeed, there are three diseases, namely respiratory bronchiolitis-associated ILD, desquamative interstitial pneumonia and pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis, that are currently considered aetiologically linked to smoking and a few others which are more likely to develop in smokers. Here, we aim to focus on the most recent findings regarding the role of smoking in the pathogenesis and clinical behaviour of ILDs.

Smoking is implicated in the pathogenesis and clinical behaviour of interstitial lung diseasehttp://ow.ly/PYLcT

Smoking-related idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: A review

For many years, cigarette smoking has been considered as the leading cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer. Recently, however, it has also been associated with the development of diffuse interstitial lung diseases. In the latest classification of the major idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIP), the term smoking-related IIP has been introduced, including two entities, namely desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP) and respiratory bronchiolitis-interstitial lung disease (RB-ILD). Other entities in which smoking has a definite or suggested role include pulmonary Langerhan's cell histiocytosis, smoking-related interstitial fibrosis, combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema syndrome and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. In this review, we will focus on the mechanisms of smoking-related lung damage and on the clinical aspects of these disorders with the exception of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, which will be reviewed elsewhere in this review series.

Changes in the current classification of IIP: A critical review

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIP) are a heterogeneous group characterized by unknown aetiology. Establishment of a correct diagnosis of a distinct IIP requires a multidisciplinary approach integrating clinical presentation, physiological data, radiological appearance and histological findings. The 2013 update of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification summarises progress in the field of IIP and outlines potential areas for future research. The main entities defined by the 2002 statement on IIP are preserved, but major IIP are now distinguished from rare IIP and the new category of unclassifiable IIP is introduced. In addition, the existence of idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia as a separate chronic fibrosing IIP and idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis as a specific rare entity are acknowledged. Moreover, the major IIP are categorized according to the features chronic fibrosing, smoking-related and acute/subacute clinical course. Furthermore, a clinical classification of IIP according to disease behaviour with suggestions for treatment goals and monitoring strategies is provided. The goal of this review is to discuss the areas of uncertainty in the updated multidisciplinary classification of IIP and point out potential consequences for clinical management.