Comparative efficacy and potency of ipratropium via Turbuhaler and pressurized metered-dose inhaler in reversible airflow obstruction

Performance of Turbuhaler((R)) in Patients with Acute Airway Obstruction and COPD, and in Children with Asthma : Understanding the Clinical Importance of Adequate Peak Inspiratory Flow, High Lung Deposition, and Low In Vivo Dose Variability

The dry-powder inhaler (DPI) Turbuhaler((R)) has been on the market for nearly two decades. Products containing terbutaline, formoterol, budesonide, and the combination budesonide/formoterol are widely used by patients with asthma and COPD. Most patients and physicians find Turbuhaler((R)) easy to use, and local side effects are rare. This is thought to arise from the lack of additives or only small amounts in the formulation, in addition to minimal deposition of the drug in the oropharynx and on the vocal cords during inspiration.The function of Turbuhaler((R)) has frequently been questioned. This article aims to review and clarify some key issues that have been challenged in the literature (e.g. the effectiveness of Turbuhaler((R)) in patients with more restricting conditions), to discuss the importance of lung deposition, and to explain the low in vivo variability associated with Turbuhaler((R)) and the lack of correlation with the higher in vitro variability.Turbuhaler((R)), like other DPIs, is flow dependent to some degree. However, a peak inspiratory flow (PIF) through Turbuhaler((R)) of 30 L/min gives a good clinical effect. These PIF values can be obtained by patients with conditions thought to be difficult to manage with inhalational agents, such as asthmatic children and adult patients with acute severe airway obstruction and COPD. Excellent clinical results with Turbuhaler((R)) in large controlled studies in patients with COPD and acute severe airway obstruction provide indirect evidence that medication delivered via Turbuhaler((R)) reaches the target organ.Due to the large amount of small particles and the moderate inbuilt resistance in Turbuhaler((R)), which opens up the vocal cords during inhalation, Turbuhaler((R)) is associated with a high lung deposition (25-40% of the delivered dose) compared with pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and other DPIs. A good correlation has been found between lung deposition and clinical efficacy. A high lung deposition always results in the best ratio between clinical efficacy and risk of unwanted systemic activity. Studies with Turbuhaler((R)) also show that the in vivo variation in lung deposition is significantly lower compared with a pMDI or, for example, the Diskus((R)) inhaler, and much lower than the in vitro dose variability seen in laboratory tests. Turbuhaler((R)) appears to be a reliable DPI which can be used with confidence by patients with airway diseases, including those with clinical conditions believed to be difficult to manage with inhalational therapy.

Comparing MDI and DPI aerosol deposition using in vitro experiments and a new stochastic individual path (SIP) model of the conducting airways

PURPOSE

Deposition characteristics of MDI and DPI aerosols were compared throughout the conducting airways for the first time using a combination of in vitro experiments and a newly developed stochastic individual path (SIP) model for different inhalation profiles.

METHODS

In vitro experiments were used to determine initial particle distribution profiles and to validate computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model results for a MDI and DPI delivering the same dose of drug in a geometry of the mouth-throat and tracheobronchial airways. The validated CFD model was then used to predict the transport and deposition of the drug using correct and incorrect inhalation profiles for each inhaler.

RESULTS

The MDI delivered approximately two times more drug to the tracheobronchial region compared with the DPI for both correct and incorrect inhalation profiles. Errors in inhalation reduced the deposited tracheobronchial dose by approximately 30% for both inhalers. The DPI delivered the largest dose to the mouth-throat (~70%) and the MDI delivered the largest dose to the alveolar airways (~50%).

CONCLUSIONS

The developed in silico model provides new insights into the lung delivery of pharmaceutical aerosols and can be applied in future studies in combination with pharmacokinetic analysis to establish bioequivalence between devices.

Pressurised metered dose inhalers versus all other hand-held inhaler devices to deliver beta-2 agonist bronchodilators for non-acute asthma

BACKGROUND

A number of different inhaler devices are available to deliver beta2-agonist bronchodilators in asthma. These include hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) or chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free propelled pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder devices.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical effectiveness of pMDI compared with any other available handheld inhaler device for the delivery of short-acting beta-2 agonist bronchodilators in non-acute asthma in children and adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Collaboration Clinical Trials register was searched for studies as well as separate additional searches carried out on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and also on the Current Contents Index as well as the Science Citation Index. In addition, 17 individual online respiratory journals and 12 electronically available clinical trial databases were also searched. The UK pharmaceutical companies who manufacture inhaled asthma medication were contacted in order to obtain details of any published or unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

- The full texts of all potentially relevant articles were reviewed independently by two reviewers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Fixed and random effect models were used. Dichotomous outcomes were assessed using Odds Ratios or Relative Risks (RR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-four randomised controlled trials were included in this review, but few could be combined to assess a specific outcome for a given delivery device comparison. Only two studies required demonstration of adequate pMDI technique as an entry requirement. There were no difference between a standard CFC containing pMDI and any other device for most outcomes. Regular use of HFA-pMDI containing salbutamol reduced the requirement for short courses of oral corticosteroids (3 trials, 519 patients: RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.49, 0.91); however the total number of exacerbations were unchanged (3 trials, 1271 patients: RR 1.0; 95% CI 0.75, 1.33).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable asthma, short-acting beta-2 bronchodilators in standard CFC-pMDI's are as effective as any other devices. The effect of HFA-pMDI on requirement for oral corticosteroid courses to treat acute exacerbations should be confirmed. Effectiveness studies that use an intention-to-treat analysis are required.

Improved delivery of ipratropium bromide using Respimat (a new soft mist inhaler) compared with a conventional metered dose inhaler: cumulative dose response study in patients with COPD

Respimat (RMT) is a reusable, propellant-free, soft mist inhaler (SMI), a novel device for inhalation therapy. We conducted a three-period cross-over study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cumulative doses of ipratropium bromide inhaled from RMT (Two dose levels) or from a pressurized metered dose inhaler (MDI), in 36 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The bronchodilator effect of ipratropium bromide was greater when administered via RMT (10 or 20 microg per puff, given double-blind within device, to total doses of 160 or 320 microg) than via MDI (20 microg per puff, total dose 320 microg). The bronchodilator effects of the 160 and 320 microg doses delivered via RMT were similar. Cumulative ipratropium bromide doses of 320 microg given via MDI or RMT and 160 microg given via RMT produced similar safety profiles. Between 45 min after the first drug inhalation and 45 min after the final dose, greater bronchodilatory effect was obtained from half the cumulative dose of ipratropium (RMT 10 microg per puff) when compared with the MDI (20 microg per puff). Therefore, ipratropium bromide delivered by RMT is as safe as, and can be more effective than, the MDI on acute administration in patients with COPD.

The protective effect of salbutamol inhaled using different devices on methacholine bronchoconstriction

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the protective effect of salbutamol, 100 microg, inhaled by different devices (pressurized metered-dose inhaler [pMDI; Ventolin; GlaxoWellcome; Greenford, UK], pMDI + spacer [Volumatic; GlaxoWellcome], or breath-activated pMDI [Autohaler; 3M Pharmaceuticals; St. Paul, MN]) on bronchoconstriction induced by methacholine.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study.

PATIENTS

Eighteen subjects with stable, moderate asthma, asymptomatic, receiving regular treatment with salmeterol, 50 microg bid, and inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate, 250 microg bid, in the last 6 months, with high hyperreactivity to methacholine (baseline provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) [PD(20)] geometric mean [GM], 0.071 mg). Subjects were classified into two groups: subjects with incorrect (n = 5) pMDI inhalation technique, and subjects with correct (n = 13) inhalation technique.

METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS

After cessation of therapy for 3 days, all subjects underwent four methacholine challenge tests, each test 1 week apart, each time 15 min after inhalation of salbutamol, 100 microg (via pMDI, pMDI + spacer, or Autohaler), or placebo. The protective effect on methacholine challenge test was evaluated as the change in the PD(20), and expressed in terms of doubling doses of methacholine in comparison with placebo treatment.

RESULTS

The PD(20) was significantly higher after salbutamol inhalation than after placebo inhalation, but no significant difference was observed among the three different inhalation techniques. Only when salbutamol was inhaled via pMDI + spacer, PD(20) was slightly but not significantly higher (pMDI GM, 0.454 mg; pMDI + spacer GM, 0.559 mg; and Autohaler GM, 0.372 mg; not significant [NS]) than other inhalation techniques. Similar results (mean +/-SEM) were obtained with doubling doses of methacholine (pMDI, 2 +/- 0.47; pMDI + spacer, 3 +/- 0.35; and Autohaler, 2.4 +/- 0.40; NS). No significant difference was found among techniques when subjects with correct or incorrect inhalation technique were separately considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that the protective effect of salbutamol, 100 microg, on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction is not affected by the different inhalation techniques, although inhalation via pMDI + spacer tends to improve the bronchoprotective ability of salbutamol. These data confirm the clinical efficacy of salbutamol, whatever the device, and the patient's inhalation technique.