Effect of 1 month of zopiclone on obstructive sleep apnoea severity and symptoms: a randomised controlled trial

Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Stroke: Determining the Mechanisms Behind their Association and Treatment Options

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) can be a sequela of stroke caused by vascular injury to vital respiratory centers, cerebral edema, and increased intracranial pressure of space-occupying lesions. Likewise, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) contributes to increased stroke risk through local mechanisms such as impaired ischemic cerebrovascular response and systemic effects such as promoting atherosclerosis, hypercoagulability, cardiac arrhythmias, vascular-endothelial dysfunction, and metabolic syndrome. The impact of OSA on stroke outcomes has been established, yet it receives less attention in national guidelines on stroke management than hyperglycemia and blood pressure dysregulation. Furthermore, whether untreated OSA worsens stroke outcomes is not well-described in the literature. This scoping review provides an updated investigation of the correlation between OSA and stroke, including inter-relational pathophysiology. This review also highlights the importance of OSA treatment and its role in stroke outcomes. Knowledge of pathophysiology, the inter-relationship between these common disorders, and the impact of OSA therapy on outcomes affect the clinical management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. In addition, understanding the relationship between stroke outcomes and pre-existing OSA will allow clinicians to predict outcomes while treating acute stroke.

Pharmacological treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Summarize the evidence on drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnea.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on February 17th, 2023. A search strategy retrieved randomized clinical trials comparing the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) in pharmacotherapies. Studies were selected and data was extracted by two authors independently. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RevMan 5.4. was used for data synthesis.

RESULTS

4930 articles were obtained, 68 met inclusion criteria, and 29 studies (involving 11 drugs) were combined in a meta-analysis. Atomoxetine plus oxybutynin vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -7.71 (-10.59, -4.83) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 50 %, overall effect: Z = 5.25, p < 0.001]. Donepezil vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -8.56 (-15.78, -1.33) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 21 %, overall effect: Z = 2.32, p = 0.02]. Sodium oxybate vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -5.50 (-9.28, -1.73) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 32 %, overall effect: Z = 2.86, p = 0.004]. Trazodone vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -12.75 (-21.30, -4.19) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 0 %, overall effect: Z = 2.92, p = 0.003].

CONCLUSION

The combination of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic drugs shows promising results. Identifying endotypes may be the key to future drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnea. Moreover, studies with longer follow-up assessing the safety and sustained effects of these treatments are needed.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022362639.

Co-morbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA): recent research and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea have previously been viewed as completely independent conditions. However, there is now increasing recognition that insomnia and sleep apnea frequently co-occur. Co-morbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA) is a highly prevalent condition that is associated with impairment of sleep, daytime function, mental health and physical health outcomes, and mortality risk. This review aims to provide an update on COMISA prevalence, consequences, treatment approaches, and future research directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

People with COMISA experience worse sleep, mental health, physical health, quality of life and longevity compared to people with neither condition, and often compared to those with insomnia alone and sleep apnea alone. Emerging evidence suggests that cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia is an effective treatment in the presence of treated and untreated sleep apnea, that may also improve manifestations and subsequent management of sleep apnea. Future research is required to understand the etiology of COMISA, and to develop and implement tailored treatment approaches.

SUMMARY

It is important for sleep and respiratory technicians, researchers and clinicians to be aware of the high co-morbidity rates, consequences, and treatment requirements of patients with co-morbid insomnia and sleep apnea.

Stepwise Add-On and Endotype-informed Targeted Combination Therapy to Treat Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Rationale: Oral appliance therapy (OAT) is an effective treatment for many people with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, OSA pathogenesis is heterogeneous, and, in ∼50% of cases, OAT does not fully control OSA. Objectives: This study aimed to control OSA in individuals with an incomplete response to OAT alone by using additional targeted therapies informed by OSA endotype characterization. Methods: Twenty-three people with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], 41 ± 19 events/h) not fully resolved (AHI, >10 events/h) with OAT alone were prospectively recruited. OSA endotypes were characterized pretherapy during a detailed physiology study night. Initially, an expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) valve and supine avoidance device therapy were added to target the impaired anatomical endotype. Those with residual OSA (AHI, >10 events/h) then received one or more nonanatomical interventions based on endotype characterization. This included O2 (4 L/min) to reduce high loop gain (unstable respiratory control) and 80/5 mg atomoxetine-oxybutynin to increase pharyngeal muscle activity. Finally, if required, OAT was combined with EPAP and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Results: Twenty participants completed the study. OSA was successfully controlled (AHI, <10 events/h) with combination therapy in all but one participant (17 of 20 without CPAP). OAT plus EPAP and supine avoidance therapy treated OSA in 10 (50%) participants. OSA was controlled in five (25%) participants with the addition of O2 therapy, one with atomoxetine-oxybutynin, and one required O2 plus atomoxetine-oxybutynin. Two participants required CPAP for their OSA, and another was CPAP intolerant. Conclusions: These novel prospective findings highlight the potential of precision medicine to inform targeted combination therapy to treat OSA. Clinical trial registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001995268).

The placebo effect in pharmacological treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

New drug treatments are under development in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The placebo effect is well recognized in various conditions, but its relevance in OSA is debated. In the current study we determined the influence of a placebo effect in studies of drug therapy in OSA.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42021229410) with searches in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to 2021-01-19. Inclusion criteria were (i) RCTs of adults with OSA, (ii) drug intervention with placebo baseline and follow-up sleep study (iii) outcomes: apnea hypopnea index (AHI), mean oxygen saturation (mSaO2), oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and/or Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Risk-of-bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB 2.

RESULTS

7436 articles were identified and 29 studies included (n = 413). Studies were generally small (median n = 14), with 78% men, baseline AHI range 9-74 events/h and treatment duration range 1-120 days. Meta-analyses were conducted for main outcomes. Mean change of the primary outcome, AHI, was -0.84 (95% CI -2.98 to 1.30); mSaO2 and ODI estimations were also non-significant. ESS showed a trend towards a reduction of -1 unit. Subgroup analysis did not show significant differences. Risk-of-bias assessment indicated mostly low risk but studies were small with wide confidence intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis we did not identify systematic placebo effects on the AHI, ODI or mSaO2 while ESS score showed a trend for a small reduction. These results have an impact on the design and interpretation of drug trials in OSA.

Hypnotic Medications as an Adjunct Treatment to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia

Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the universally recommended treatment of choice for insomnia disorder based on its safety and posttreatment durability of benefit. However, CBT-I does not help all patients achieve remission. The second most evidence-based treatment, hypnotic pharmacotherapy (PCT), does not resolve perpetuating factors of insomnia, resulting in potential waning of benefit and dependence. This article presents a rationale that supports consideration of hypnotic augmentation of CBT-I (COMB), along with a review of select randomized controlled trials relevant to clinical decision-making.

New pharmacologic agents for obstructive sleep apnoea: what do we know and what can we expect?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides a condensed description of pharmacological remedies explored in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) as well as projections of what we might expect in terms of clinical performance of these drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conventional drug therapies explored in OSA have generally produced disappointing results and there is a shortage of pharmacological treatment alternatives in this disorder. Recent insights into pathophysiological mechanisms potentially involved in OSA suggest that the condition may be divided into distinct subgroups based on clusters or defined by means of unique functional endotypic criteria. In fact, positive outcomes in clinical trials have now resulted in several drug candidates that show a convincing reduction of sleep disordered breathing in both short and intermediate term. Such drugs may be particularly useful in certain variants of OSA but not in others. These insights have also raised the ambition to create personalized therapies in OSA. Another recent development is the insight that OSA-linked conditions such as obesity, daytime somnolence and various forms of cardiovascular/metabolic disease may provide drug-based targets. For instance, pharmacological obesity therapy may provide not only positive metabolic effects but may also be a way to eliminate the anatomic component in obese OSA patients.

SUMMARY

Recent insights into the pathophysiology of OSA have opened possibilities to develop personalized therapy. Drugs addressing fundamental aspects of the sleep and breathing disorder provide a particularly promising avenue for development of novel forms of treatment in OSA.

Turning Over a New Leaf-Pharmacologic Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Despite extensive research, there is currently no approved drug for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment. OSA is a heterogeneous condition that involves multiple dominating pathophysiological traits. Drug development in this field needs to address both pathophysiological mechanisms and associated comorbid conditions in order to meet requirements for long-term therapy in OSA. Several drug candidates have been proposed and ongoing phase II trials that target various forms of sleep-disordered breathing have been initiated. The field is moving toward tailored therapeutic approaches in patients with OSA.

Current and Novel Treatment Options for OSA

Obstructive sleep apnoea is a challenging medical problem due to its prevalence, its impact on quality of life and performance in school and professionally, the implications for risk of accidents, and comorbidities and mortality. Current research has carved out a broad spectrum of clinical phenotypes and defined major pathophysiological components. These findings point to the concept of personalised therapy, oriented on both the distinct clinical presentation and the most relevant pathophysiology in the individual patient. This leads to questions of whether sufficient therapeutic options other than positive airway pressure (PAP) alone are available, for which patients they may be useful, if there are specific indications for single or combined treatment, and whether there is solid scientific evidence for recommendations. This review describes our knowledge on PAP and non-PAP therapies to address upper airway collapsibility, muscle responsiveness, arousability and respiratory drive. The spectrum is broad and heterogeneous, including technical and pharmaceutical options already in clinical use or at an advanced experimental stage. Although there is an obvious need for more research on single or combined therapies, the available data demonstrate the variety of effective options, which should replace the unidirectional focus on PAP therapy.

The analysis of individual pathophysiological composition opens new directions towards personalised treatment of OSA, focusing not only on pharyngeal dilation, but also on technical or pharmaceutical interventions on muscle function or breathing regulationhttps://bit.ly/3sayhkd

Novel avenues to approach non-CPAP therapy and implement comprehensive OSA care

Recent advances in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) pathophysiology and translational research have opened new lines of investigation for OSA treatment and management. Key goals of such investigations are to provide efficacious, alternative treatment and management pathways that are better tailored to individual risk profiles to move beyond the traditional, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)-focused, "one size fits all", trial and error approach which is too frequently inadequate for many patients. Identification of different clinical manifestations of OSA (clinical phenotypes) and underlying pathophysiological phenotypes (endotypes), that contribute to OSA have provided novel insights into underlying mechanisms and have underpinned these efforts. Indeed, this new knowledge has provided the framework for precision medicine for OSA to improve treatment success rates with existing non-CPAP therapies such as mandibular advancement devices and upper airway surgery, and newly developed therapies such as hypoglossal nerve stimulation and emerging therapies such as pharmacotherapies and combination therapy. These concepts have also provided insight into potential physiological barriers to CPAP adherence for certain patients. This review summarises the recent advances in OSA pathogenesis, non-CPAP treatment, clinical management approaches and highlights knowledge gaps for future research. OSA endotyping and clinical phenotyping, risk stratification and personalised treatment allocation approaches are rapidly evolving and will further benefit from the support of recent advances in e-health and artificial intelligence.

Addition of zolpidem to combination therapy with atomoxetine-oxybutynin increases sleep efficiency and the respiratory arousal threshold in obstructive sleep apnoea: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Atomoxetine combined with oxybutynin (Ato-Oxy) has recently been shown to reduce obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity by >60%. However, Ato-Oxy also modestly reduced the respiratory arousal threshold, which may decrease sleep quality/efficiency. We sought to investigate the additional effect of zolpidem with Ato-Oxy on sleep efficiency (primary outcome), the arousal threshold, OSA severity, other standard polysomnography (PSG) parameters, next-day sleepiness and alertness (secondary outcomes).

METHODS

Twelve participants with OSA received 10 mg zolpidem plus Ato-Oxy (80-5 mg, respectively) or Ato-Oxy plus placebo prior to overnight in-laboratory PSG according to a double-blind, randomized, crossover design (1-week washout). Participants were fitted with an epiglottic catheter, a nasal mask and pneumotachograph to quantify arousal threshold and airflow. Next-day sleepiness and alertness were assessed via the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale and a driving simulation task.

RESULTS

The addition of zolpidem increased sleep efficiency by 9% ± 13% (80.9% ± 16.9% vs. 88.2% ± 8.2%, p = 0.037) and the respiratory arousal threshold by 17% ± 18% (-26.6 ± 14.5 vs. -33.8 ± 20.3 cm H₂ O, p = 0.004) versus Ato-Oxy + placebo. Zolpidem did not systematically change OSA severity. Combination therapy was well tolerated, and zolpidem did not worsen next-day sleepiness. However, median steering deviation during the driving simulator task increased following the zolpidem combination.

CONCLUSION

Zolpidem improves sleep efficiency via an increase in the respiratory arousal threshold to counteract potential wake-promoting properties of atomoxetine in OSA. These changes occur without altering the rate of respiratory events or overnight hypoxaemia. However, while the addition of zolpidem does not increase next-day perceived sleepiness, caution is warranted given the potential impact on next-morning objective alertness.

Physiological Traits and Adherence to Therapy of Sleep Apnea in Individuals with Coronary Artery Disease

RATIONALE

Untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the most common treatment, but despite interventions addressing established adherence determinants, CPAP use remains poor.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether physiological traits that cause OSA are associated with long-term CPAP adherence in patients with CAD.

METHODS

Participants in the RICCADSA trial with objective CPAP adherence (hours/night) over 2 years and analyzable raw polysomnography data were included (n=249). The physiological traits -loop gain, arousal threshold (ArTH), collapsibility and muscle compensation- were measured from polysomnography. Linear mixed models assessed the relationship between the traits and adherence. We also compared actual CPAP adherence between physiology-predicted "poor" (lowest quartile of predicted adherence) and "good" (all others) adherers.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Median (IQR) CPAP use declined from 3.2 (1.0, 5.8) to 3.0 (0.0, 5.6) hours/night over 24-mo (p<0.001). In analyses adjusted for demographics, anthropometrics, OSA characteristics and clinical comorbidities, lower ArTH was associated with worse CPAP adherence (0.7 hours/SD ArTH, p=0.021). Both high and low muscle compensation were associated with lower adherence (p=0.008). Predicted "poor" adherers exhibited markedly lower CPAP use compared to "good" adherers for up to 2 years of follow-up (group differences: 2.0 to 3.2 hours/night, p<0.003 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

A low ArTH as well as a very low and high muscle compensation are associated with worse long-term CPAP adherence in patients with CAD and OSA. Physiological traits, alongside established determinants, may help predict and improve CPAP adherence.

Different antimuscarinics when combined with atomoxetine have differential effects on obstructive sleep apnea severity

The combination of the noradrenergic agent atomoxetine plus the antimuscarinic oxybutynin has recently been shown to improve upper airway physiology and reduce obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity. However, the effects of different antimuscarinics when combined with atomoxetine is limited. This study aimed to determine the effects of atomoxetine combined with two different antimuscarinics with varying M-subtype receptor selectivity on OSA severity and upper airway physiology. Ten people with predominantly severe OSA completed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Participants completed three overnight in-laboratory sleep studies after either 80 mg atomoxetine + 5 mg solifenacin succinate (ato-sol) or 80 mg atomoxetine + 2 mg biperiden hydrochloride (ato-bip) or placebo. OSA severity, ventilatory stability (loop gain), respiratory-arousal threshold (via epiglottic manometry), next-day subjective sleepiness [Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)], and alertness were compared between conditions. Neither drug combination altered the apnea/hypopnea index versus placebo (P = 0.63). Ato-sol caused a shift toward milder respiratory events with reduced frequency of obstructive apneas (13 ± 14 vs. 22 ± 17 events/h; means ± SD, P = 0.04) and increased hypopneas during nonrapid eye movement (NREM) (38 ± 21 vs. 24 ± 18 events/h, P = 0.006) with improved nadir oxygenation versus placebo (83 ± 4 vs. 80 ± 8%, P = 0.03). Both combinations reduced loop gain by ∼10% versus placebo; sleep efficiency and arousal threshold were unaltered. Ato-bip reduced next-day sleepiness versus placebo (KSS = 4.3 ± 2.2 vs. 5.6 ± 1.6, P = 0.03). Atomoxetine + biperiden hydrochloride reduces perceived sleepiness, and atomoxetine + solifenacin modestly improves upper airway function in people with OSA but to a lesser extent versus recently published atomoxetine + oxybutynin (broad M-subtype receptor selectivity) findings. These results provide novel mechanistic insight into the role of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents on sleep and breathing and are important for pharmacotherapy development for OSA.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In contrast to recent findings of major reductions in OSA severity when atomoxetine is combined with a nonspecific antimuscarinic, oxybutynin (broad M-subtype receptor selectivity), addition of solifenacin succinate (M2 and M3 muscarinic receptor selectivity) or biperiden (M1 muscarinic receptor selectivity) with atomoxetine had modest effects on upper airway function during sleep, which provide mechanistic insight into the role of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents on sleep and breathing and are important for pharmacotherapy development for OSA.

Effects of hypnotics on obstructive sleep apnea endotypes and severity: Novel insights into pathophysiology and treatment

Impaired upper airway anatomy is the main cause of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, there are other important non-anatomical contributors or "endotypes" including ventilatory control instability, poor pharyngeal dilator muscle responsiveness and waking up too easily to minor respiratory events (low arousal threshold). Recent studies have focused on the potential to target specific OSA causes with novel treatments to reduce OSA severity and improve efficacy with existing non-CPAP therapies which are often suboptimal (e.g., mandibular advancement splints). One novel target is pharmacotherapy with hypnotics to increase the threshold for arousal and reduce OSA severity in the approximately 30% of patients who have a low arousal threshold endotype. This increasing body of work has produced varied and at times unexpected findings which have challenged previous knowledge on the effects of hypnotics on upper airway physiology and breathing during sleep in people with OSA. This review provides a concise overview of the latest research that has investigated the effects of common hypnotics/sedative agents on upper airway physiology and OSA severity and potential implications for OSA pathophysiology, treatment and safety. This includes a summary of the latest knowledge on the effects of hypnotics on OSA endotypes. Priorities for future research are also highlighted.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea as a Cardiovascular Risk Factor-Beyond CPAP

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) experience repetitive partial or complete airway collapse during sleep resulting in nocturnal hypoxia-normoxia cycling, and are at increased cardiovascular risk. The number of apneas and hypopneas indexed per hour of sleep (apnea-hypopnea index) along with the associated intermittent hypoxia predict the increased cardiovascular risk; thus, their attenuation or prevention are objectives of OSA therapy. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard treatment for OSA and, when effective, mitigates the apnea-hypopnea index and hypoxemia. As such, it is reasonable to expect CPAP would decrease cardiovascular risk. However, 3 recent randomized clinical trials of CPAP vs usual care did not show any significant effects of CPAP in attenuating incident cardiovascular events in patients with OSA. In this review, we discuss these studies in addition to potential complementary therapeutic options to CPAP (eg, neurostimulation) and conclude with suggested therapeutic targets for future interventional studies (eg, the autonomic nervous system). Although these areas of research are exciting, they have yet to be tested to any similar degree of rigour as CPAP.

Considering the Role of Adherence in New and Emerging Sleep Treatments

There are several novel and emerging treatments for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), including new devices and pharmacotherapies. Long-term efficacy and adherence data for these interventions in the sleep context are lacking. Future studies exploring the long-term adherence and efficacy in novel and emerging treatments of OSA are required to fully understand the place of these treatments in treatment hierarchies. Such research also should aim to evaluate the use of these novel therapies in real-world clinical settings, because many of the studies performed to date have been done under closely monitored research populations and relatively small sample sizes.

Zolpidem increases sleep efficiency and the respiratory arousal threshold without changing sleep apnoea severity and pharyngeal muscle activity

KEY POINTS

A decreased respiratory arousal threshold is one of the main contributors to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) pathogenesis. Several recent studies have sought to find a drug capable of increasing the respiratory arousal threshold without impairing pharyngeal muscle activity to reduce OSA severity, with variable success. Here we show that zolpidem increases the respiratory arousal threshold by ∼15%, an effect size which was insufficient to systematically decrease OSA severity as measured by the apnoea-hypopnoea index. Unlike recent physiological findings that showed paradoxical increases in pharyngeal muscle responsiveness during transient manipulations of airway pressure, zolpidem did not alter pharyngeal muscle responsiveness during natural sleep. It did, however, increase sleep efficiency without changing apnoea length, oxygen desaturation, next-day perceived sleepiness and alertness. These novel findings indicate that zolpidem was well tolerated and effective in promoting sleep in people with OSA, which may be therapeutically useful for people with OSA and comorbid insomnia.

ABSTRACT

A recent physiology study performed using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) manipulations indicated that the hypnotic zolpidem increases the arousal threshold and genioglossus responsiveness in people with and without obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Thus, zolpidem may stabilise breathing and reduce OSA severity without CPAP. Accordingly, we sought to determine the effects of zolpidem on OSA severity, upper airway physiology and next-day sleepiness and alertness. Nineteen people with OSA with low-to-moderate arousal threshold received 10 mg zolpidem or placebo according to a double-blind, randomised, cross-over design. Participants completed two overnight in-laboratory polysomnographies (1-week washout), with an epiglottic catheter, intramuscular genioglossus electromyography, nasal mask and pneumotachograph to measure OSA severity, arousal threshold and upper airway muscle responsiveness. Next-morning sleepiness and alertness were also assessed. Zolpidem did not change the apnoea-hypopnoea index versus placebo (40.6 ± 12.3 vs. 40.3 ± 16.4 events/h (means ± SD), p = 0.938) or nadir oxyhaemoglobin saturation (79.6 ± 6.6 vs. 79.7 ± 7.4%, p = 0.932), but was well tolerated. Zolpidem increased sleep efficiency by 9 ± 14% (83 ± 11 vs. 73 ± 17%, p = 0.010). Arousal threshold increased by 15 ± 5% with zolpidem throughout all sleep stages (p = 0.010), whereas genioglossus muscle responsiveness did not change. Next-morning sleepiness and alertness were not different between nights. In summary, a single night of 10 mg zolpidem is well tolerated and does not cause next-day impairment in alertness or sleepiness, or overnight hypoxaemia in OSA. However, despite increases in arousal threshold without any change in pharyngeal muscle responsiveness, zolpidem does not alter OSA severity. It does, however, increase sleep efficiency by ∼10%, which may be beneficial in people with OSA and insomnia.

A Review of Current Tools Used for Evaluating the Severity of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common and heterogeneous disease characterized by episodic collapse within the upper airways, which leads to reduced ventilation and adverse consequences, including hypoxia, hypercapnia, sleep fragmentation, and long-term effects such as cardiovascular comorbidities. The clinical diagnosis of OSA and its severity classification are often determined based on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), defining the number of apneic and hypopnea events per hour of sleep. However, the limitations of the AHI to assess disease severity have necessitated the exploration of other metrics for additional information to reflect the complexity of OSA. Novel parameters such as the hypoxic burden have the potential to better capture the main features of OSA by maximizing the information available from the polysomnogram. These emerging measures have described multidimensional qualities of sleep-disordered breathing events and breathing irregularity and will ultimately result in better management of OSA.

Targeting Endotypic Traits with Medications for the Pharmacological Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A Review of the Current Literature

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent condition with few therapeutic options. To date there is no approved pharmacotherapy for this disorder, but several attempts have been made in the past and are currently ongoing to find one. The recent identification of multiple endotypes underlying this disorder has oriented the pharmacological research towards tailored therapies targeting specific pathophysiological traits that contribute differently to cause OSA in each patient. In this review we retrospectively analyze the literature on OSA pharmacotherapy dividing the medications tested on the basis of the four main endotypes: anatomy, upper airway muscle activity, arousal threshold and ventilatory instability (loop gain). We show how recently introduced drugs for weight loss that modify upper airway anatomy may play an important role in the management of OSA in the near future, and promising results have been obtained with drugs that increase upper airway muscle activity during sleep and reduce loop gain. The lack of a medication that can effectively increase the arousal threshold makes this strategy less encouraging, although recent studies have shown that the use of certain sedatives do not worsen OSA severity and could actually improve patients' sleep quality.

Redesigning Care for OSA

Constrained by a limited supply of specialized personnel, health systems face a challenge in caring for the large number of patients with OSA. The complexity of this challenge is heightened by the varied clinical presentations of OSA and the diversity of treatment approaches. Innovations such as simplified home-based care models and the incorporation of nonspecialist providers have shown promise in the management of uncomplicated patients, producing comparable outcomes to the resource-intensive traditional approach. However, it is unclear if these innovations can meet the needs of all patients with OSA, including those with mild disease, atypical presentations, and certain comorbid medical and mental health conditions. This review discusses the diversity of needs in OSA care, the evidence base behind recent care innovations, and the potential limitations of each innovation in meeting the diversity of care needs. We propose how these innovations can fit within the stepped care and hub and spoke models in a way that addresses the full spectrum of OSA, and we discuss future research directions to assess the deployment of these innovations.

The effects of zolpidem in obstructive sleep apnea - An open-label pilot study

New knowledge on hypnotics and their effects on the phenotypic causes of obstructive sleep apnea indicate that zolpidem has therapeutic potential for certain patients. Specifically, zolpidem increases the threshold for arousal threshold and pharyngeal dilator muscle responsiveness. However, the effects of a standard dose of zolpidem (10 mg) on obstructive sleep apnea severity and symptoms have not been investigated. In an open-label pilot study, 12 unselected people with obstructive sleep apnea were recruited following a diagnostic in-laboratory sleep study. Participants then returned for a single-night sleep study in which 10 mg of zolpidem was given just prior to sleep. Tolerability, next-day sleepiness and the effects of zolpidem on polysomnography variables were assessed. Zolpidem was well tolerated and significantly improved the sleep efficiency compared with the no-drug night (77 ± 12% versus 84 ± 9%, p = 0.005). Individual responses on obstructive sleep apnea severity to zolpidem in this unselected obstructive sleep apnea patient population were variable with no overall systematic difference in apnea-hypopnea index (29 ± 18.2 events per hr versus 33 ± 28 events per hr, p = 0.45) or other key respiratory parameters (e.g. event duration or hypoxemia). Next-day sleepiness assessed via the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale was not different between visits (4 ± 1 versus 4 ± 2, p = 0.85). These findings provide the first insight into the effects of a standard dose of zolpidem in obstructive sleep apnea, and highlight its tolerability and potential to improve sleep quality. The variable effects on obstructive sleep apnea severity observed in this pilot also underscore the need for larger trials that incorporate phenotypic characterisation (e.g. arousal threshold, Pcrit and muscle responsiveness) to understand inter-individual heterogeneity and the therapeutic potential of zolpidem for certain people with obstructive sleep apnea.