Oral steroid-sparing effect of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids in asthma

Imagining the severe asthma decision trees of the future

INTRODUCTION

There are no validated decision-making algorithms concerning severe asthma (SA) management. Future risks are crucial factors and can be derived from SA trajectories.

AREAS COVERED

The future severe asthma-decision trees should revisit current knowledge and gaps. A focused literature search has been conducted.

EXPERT OPINION

Asthma severity is currently defined a priori, thereby precluding a role for early interventions aiming to prevent outcomes such as exacerbations (systemic corticosteroids exposure) and lung function decline. Asthma 'at-risk' might represent the ultimate paradigm but merits longitudinal studies considering modern interventions. Real exacerbations, severe airway hyperresponsiveness, excessive T2-related biomarkers, noxious environments and patient behaviors, harms of OCS and high-doses inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and low adherence-to-effectiveness ratios of ICS-containing inhalers are predictors of future risks. New tools such as imaging, genetic, and epigenetic signatures should be used. Logical and numerical artificial intelligence may be used to generate a consistent risk score. A pragmatic definition of response to treatments will allow development of a validated and applicable algorithm. Biologics have the best potential to minimize the risks, but cost remains an issue. We propose a simplified six-step algorithm for decision-making that is ultimately aiming to achieve asthma remission.

The evidence base for ICS/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy in severe asthma

We agree with P.J. McDowell and co-workers that the patients whose data are recorded in the UK Severe Asthma Registry (UKSAR) have, on average, more severe asthma than participants in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) [1, 2]. However, poor generalisability from RCTs to severe asthma registries is also the case for RCTs of high dose ICS/long-acting β-agonist (LABA) plus short-acting β-agonist (SABA) reliever therapy. There are similar differences in average baseline severity between patients in the UKSAR database and participants in RCTs of high dose versus medium dose ICS/LABA plus SABA therapy, as with those in the MART studies (table 1) [3–13].

ICS/formoterol MART is an evidence-based alternative to high dose ICS/LABA in asthma patients at high risk of severe exacerbations; limited generalisability of RCTs to severe asthma registries applies similarly to high dose ICS/LABA therapy as to MART https://bit.ly/4aVFrNH

Inhaled Corticosteroids in Subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Old, Unfinished History

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the major causes of disability and death. Maintenance use of inhaled bronchodilator(s) is the cornerstone of COPD pharmacological therapy, but inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are also commonly used. This narrative paper reviews the role of ICSs as maintenance treatment in combination with bronchodilators, usually in a single inhaler, in stable COPD subjects. The guidelines strongly recommend the addition of an ICS in COPD subjects with a history of concomitant asthma or as a step-up on the top of dual bronchodilators in the presence of hospitalization for exacerbation or at least two moderate exacerbations per year plus high blood eosinophil counts (≥300/mcl). This indication would only involve some COPD subjects. In contrast, in real life, triple inhaled therapy is largely used in COPD, independently of symptoms and in the presence of exacerbations. We will discuss the results of recent randomized controlled trials that found reduced all-cause mortality with triple inhaled therapy compared with dual inhaled long-acting bronchodilator therapy. ICS use is frequently associated with common local adverse events, such as dysphonia, oral candidiasis, and increased risk of pneumonia. Other side effects, such as systemic toxicity and unfavorable changes in the lung microbiome, are suspected mainly at higher doses of ICS in elderly COPD subjects with comorbidities, even if not fully demonstrated. We conclude that, contrary to real life, the use of ICS should be carefully evaluated in stable COPD patients.

Risk of adverse reactions associated with inhaled corticosteroids for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the majority of current therapeutic regimens for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchodilators are coupled with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to lower the inflammatory response and improve symptoms. This study aims to evaluate the safety of ICS in the treatment of COPD.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials related to ICS for COPD that were eligible up to 1 June 2023 were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. We searched and screened eligible studies for the occurrence of total adverse events, cardiovascular events, upper respiratory tract infections (URTI), pneumonia, oral Candida infections, and musculoskeletal disorders, and finally analyzed them by Review Manager 5.4.1.

RESULTS

The results showed that ICS increased the incidence of adverse reactions in COPD patients (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.10, P = .0004); ICS treatment did not increase the risk of cardiovascular events in COPD patients (RR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.88-1.02, P = .14); ICS increased the incidence of URTI in COPD patients (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.02-1.62, P = .03); ICS increased the incidence of pneumonia in patients with COPD (RR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.63-2.69, P < .00001); ICS treatment significantly increased the incidence of oral Candida in patients with COPD (RR = 2.96, 95% CI: 1.99-4.41, P < .00001); ICS increased the incidence of musculoskeletal disorders in patients with COPD (RR = 2.87, 95% CI: 1.51-5.45, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

ICS does not increase the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with COPD, but it does increase the risk of URTI, pneumonia, oral Candida infections, and musculoskeletal disorders in patients with COPD.

Formononetin ameliorates airway inflammation by suppressing ESR1/NLRP3/Caspase-1 signaling in asthma

Since inhaled glucocorticoids are the first-line treatment for asthma, asthma management becomes extremely difficult when asthma does not react well to glucocorticoids. Formononetin, a bioactive isoflavone and typical phytoestrogen, has been shown to have an anti-inflammatory impact while alleviating epithelial barrier dysfunction, which plays a role in the pathogenesis of allergic illnesses like asthma. However, the biological mechanisms behind this impact are unknown. As a result, we set out to investigate the effects of formononetin on airway inflammation and epithelial barrier repair in house dust mite (HDM)-induced asthmatic mice. We further expanded on formononetin's putative mode of action in reducing airway inflammation by modifying epithelial barrier dysfunction. In the current study, researchers discovered that formononetin significantly lowered total IgE levels in serum and interleukin (IL)-4, IL-6, and IL-17A levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in HDM-challenged asthmatic mice. Experiments on cell proliferation, migration, and apoptosis were performed in vitro to determine the effect of formononetin on bronchial epithelial barrier repair. Furthermore, in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated 16HBE cells, formononetin increased cell proliferation and migration while preventing apoptosis and lowering the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio. In vitro and in vivo, formononetin significantly inhibited toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and estrogen receptor (ESR1)/Nod-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3)/Caspase-1 signaling. These findings show that formononetin can reduce airway inflammation in HDM-challenged asthmatic mice by promoting epithelial barrier repair and possibly by inhibiting ESR1/NLRP3/Caspase-1 signaling as the underlying mechanism; formononetin could be a promising alternative treatment for asthma.

Effect of fracture risk in inhaled corticosteroids in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The fracture risk of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treated with inhaled corticosteroids is controversial. And some large-scale randomized controlled trials have not solved this problem. The purpose of our systematic review and meta-analysis including 44 RCTs is to reveal the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on the fracture risk of COPD patients.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently retrieved randomized controlled trials of inhaled corticosteroids or combinations of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of COPD from PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The primary outcome was a fracture event. This study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022366778).

RESULTS

Forty-four RCTs were performed in 87,594 patients. Inhaled therapy containing ICSs (RR, 1.19; 95%CI, 1.04-1.37; P = 0.010), especially ICS/LABA (RR, 1.30; 95%CI, 1.10-1.53; P = 0.002) and triple therapy (RR, 1.49; 95%CI, 1.03-2.17; P = 0.04) were significantly associated with the increased risk of fracture in COPD patients when compared with inhaled therapy without ICSs. Subgroup analyses showed that treatment duration ≥ 12 months (RR, 1.19; 95%CI, 1.04-1.38; P = 0.01), budesonide therapy (RR, 1.64; 95%CI., 1.07-2.51; P = 0.02), fluticasone furoate therapy (RR, 1.37; 95%CI, 1.05-1.78; P = 0.02), mean age of study participants ≥ 65 (RR, 1.27; 95%CI, 1.01-1.61; P = 0.04), and GOLD stage III(RR, 1.18; 95%CI, 1.00-1.38; P = 0.04) were significantly associated with an increased risk of fracture. In addition, budesonide ≥ 320 ug bid via MDI (RR, 1.75; 95%CI, 1.07-2.87; P = 0.03) was significantly associated with the increased risk of fracture.

CONCLUSION

Inhalation therapy with ICSs, especially ICS/LABA or triple therapy, increased the risk of fracture in patients with COPD compared with inhaled therapy without ICS. Treatment duration, mean age of participants, GOLD stage, drug dosage form, and drug dose participated in this association. Moreover, different inhalation devices of the same drug also had differences in risk of fracture.

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: A multidisciplinary review

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is a rare disease characterized by a complex allergic inflammatory reaction of airways against Aspergillus affecting patients with chronic respiratory diseases (asthma, cystic fibrosis). Exacerbation is often the way to diagnose ABPA and marks its evolution by its recurrent character leading to cortico-requirement or long-term antifungal treatment. Early diagnosis allows treatment of ABPA at an initial stage, preventing recurrence of exacerbations and long-term complications, mainly represented by bronchiectasis. This review of the literature aims to present the current state of the art in terms of diagnosis and treatment of ABPA from a multidisciplinary perspective. As there is no clinical, biological nor radiological specific sign, diagnostic criteria are regularly revised. They are mainly based on the elevation of total and specific IgE against Aspergillus fumigatus and the presence of suggestive CT abnormalities such as mucoid impaction and consolidations. ABPA management includes eviction of mold and pharmacological therapy. Exacerbations are treated in first line with a moderate dose of oral corticosteroids. Azole antifungal agents represent an alternative for the treatment of exacerbations and are the preferential strategy to reduce the future risk of exacerbations and for corticosteroids sparing. Asthma biologics may be of interest; however, their place remains to be determined. Avoiding complications of ABPA while limiting the side effects of systemic drugs remains a major challenge of ABPA management. Several drugs, including new antifungals and asthma biologics, are currently being tested and may be useful in the future.

[Diagnosis and treatment of asthma: a guideline for respiratory specialists 2023 - published by the German Respiratory Society (DGP) e. V.]

The management of asthma has fundamentally changed during the past decades. The present guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma was developed for respiratory specialists who need detailed and evidence-based information on the new diagnostic and therapeutic options in asthma. The guideline shows the new role of biomarkers, especially blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled NO (FeNO), in diagnostic algorithms of asthma. Of note, this guideline is the first worldwide to announce symptom prevention and asthma remission as the ultimate goals of asthma treatment, which can be achieved by using individually tailored, disease-modifying anti-asthmatic drugs such as inhaled steroids, allergen immunotherapy or biologics. In addition, the central role of the treatment of comorbidities is emphasized. Finally, the document addresses several challenges in asthma management, including asthma treatment during pregnancy, treatment of severe asthma or the diagnosis and treatment of work-related asthma.

Advances in Evaluation and Treatment of Severe Asthma (Part Two)

Providers caring for patients with severe, therapy-resistant asthma have novel options for their treatment. Administration of additional inhaled corticosteroids at the time of increased symptoms, a strategy referred to as anti-inflammatory rescue or AIR, has been proved to be effective in reducing the frequency of exacerbations and improving asthma-related quality of life. Long-acting muscarinic antagonists can be used in combination with long-acting beta-agonist bronchodilators for additional bronchodilation. The care of the patient with severe asthma must also include a strategy to help avoid severe, life-threatening asthma attacks, with intense patient education and a recommended survival toolkit.

Risk Assessment for Patients with Chronic Respiratory Conditions in the Context of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Statement of the German Respiratory Society with the Support of the German Association of Chest Physicians

Assessing the risk for specific patient groups to suffer from severe courses of COVID-19 is of major importance in the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. This review focusses on the risk for specific patient groups with chronic respiratory conditions, such as patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis (CF), sarcoidosis, interstitial lung diseases, lung cancer, sleep apnea, tuberculosis, neuromuscular diseases, a history of pulmonary embolism, and patients with lung transplants. Evidence and recommendations are detailed in exemplary cases. While some patient groups with chronic respiratory conditions have an increased risk for severe courses of COVID-19, an increasing number of studies confirm that asthma is not a risk factor for severe COVID-19. However, other risk factors such as higher age, obesity, male gender, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney or liver disease, cerebrovascular and neurological disease, and various immunodeficiencies or treatments with immunosuppressants need to be taken into account when assessing the risk for severe COVID-19 in patients with chronic respiratory diseases.

The role of systemic corticosteroids in severe asthma and new evidence in their management and tapering

INTRODUCTION

Based on the latest literature evidence, between 30% and 60% of adults with severe refractory asthma (SRA) are systemic corticosteroid (SCS) dependent. There are numerous therapeutic options in asthma, which are often not effective in severe forms. In these cases, SCS should be considered, but it is increasingly recognized that their regular use is often associated with significant and potentially serious adverse events.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this article is to provide an update about the recent and significant literature on SCS and to establish their role in the management of SRA. We summarized the most important and recent evidence and we provided useful indications for clinicians.

EXPERT OPINION

There is now strong evidence supporting the increased risk of comorbidities and complications with long-term SCS therapies, regardless of the dose. New evidence on SCS tapering and withdrawal will allow to define protocols to address SCS management with greater safety and effectiveness, after starting efficient steroid-sparing strategies. In the next 5years, it will be necessary to implement corrective actions to address these unmet needs, to reduce the inappropriate use of SCS by maximizing the application of more innovative and effective therapies.

Small airways targeted treatment with smart nebulizer technology could improve severe asthma in children: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

Conventional inhaler devices have a low efficacy in targeting small airways. Smart nebulizers can be used to increase deposition to small airways by adjusting the flow and depth of each inhalation based on patients 'individual inspiratory capacity. We investigated whether targeting of high dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to small airways with a smart nebulizer could reduce exacerbation rate in children with severe asthma (SA).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in children with SA using a smart nebulizer (Akita® Jet nebulizer) for the administration of high dose ICS in our outpatient clinic at the Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital. Clinical data before and after start of treatment were collected. The primary outcome was exacerbation rate, defined as: number of asthma exacerbations for which oral corticosteroid courses (OCS) were prescribed. The exacerbation rate 1 year before treatment was compared with the exacerbation rate 1 year after start of treatment. Secondary outcomes were changes in spirometry parameters, hospital admissions and medication use.

RESULTS

Data on OCS use was available for 28/31 patients. Median number of asthma exacerbations requiring OCS courses 1 year before decreased from 2 (interquartile range(IQR) 2) to 0.5 (IQR 3) 1 year after treatment (p = 0.021). Hospital admission decreased from 1 (IQR 3) to 0 (IQR 1)(p = 0.028). FEV1, FEF_25-75 and FEF₇₅ were not significantly improved after one year of treatment with the smart nebulizer (p = 0.191; p = 0.248; p = 0.572).

CONCLUSION

Targeting small airways with high dose ICS using a smart nebulizer resulted in a significant reduction in exacerbations requiring OCS after one year of treatment.

Step-up and step-down approaches in the treatment of asthma

Introduction: Significant intraindividual and temporal variability in symptom control is a feature of asthma that requires careful monitoring and the need to periodically review and adjust therapy. Both NHLBI/NAEPP and GINA offer helpful algorithms for a stepping approach to asthma.Areas covered: The problems arisen in applying the stepwise approach to the treatment of asthma proposed by NHLBI/NAEPP and GINA algorithms and their possible alternatives.Expert opinion: The current therapeutic stepping approach to asthma, which takes into account lung function, symptoms and quality of life, is certainly useful, but it does not consider the underlying mechanisms. Furthermore, patient's overestimation or underestimation of the severity of the disease and differences in the opinions on the level of asthma control required between patients and physicians and also between physicians in both primary care and specialist settings are common and may negatively affect asthma control and future risks. A reassessment of the conventional stepping approach to management of asthma is now needed. A pragmatic approach that sets therapeutic goals for each individual and associates them with the treatable traits of asthma which, when therapeutically targeted, will in many cases help to achieve the goals, seems more reasonable than the present stepping approach.

Uncontrolled Asthma: Unmet Needs in the Management of Patients

The recent scientific research has provided clinicians with the tools for substantially upgrading the standard of care in the field of bronchial asthma. Nevertheless, satisfactory asthma control still remains an unmet need worldwide. Identifying the major determinants of poor control in different asthma severity levels represents the first step towards the improvement of the overall patients' management. The present review aims to provide an overview of the main unmet needs in asthma control and of the potential tools for overcoming the issue. Implementing a personalized medicine approach is essential, not only in terms of pharmacological treatments, biologic drugs or sophisticated biomarkers. In fact, exploring the complex profile of each patient, from his inflammation phenotype to his preferences and expectations, may help in filling the gap between the big potential of currently available treatments and the overall unsatisfactory asthma control. Telemedicine and e-health technologies may provide a strategy to both optimize disease assessment on a regular basis and enhance patients' empowerment in managing their asthma. Increasing patients' awareness as well as the physicians' knowledge about asthma phenotypes and treatment options besides corticosteroid probably represent the key and more difficult goals of all the players involved in asthma management at every level.

Systemic adverse effects from inhaled corticosteroid use in asthma: a systematic review

Background

Oral corticosteroid use increases the risk of systemic adverse effects including osteoporosis, bone fractures, diabetes, ocular disorders and respiratory infections. We sought to understand if inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use in asthma is also associated with increased risk of systemic effects.

Methods

MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched to identify studies that were designed to investigate ICS-related systemic adverse effects in people with asthma. Studies were grouped by outcome: bone mineral density (BMD), respiratory infection (pneumonia or mycobacterial infection), diabetes and ocular disorder (glaucoma or cataracts). Study information was extracted using the PICO checklist. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (randomised controlled trials) and Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions-I tool (observational studies). A narrative synthesis was carried out due to the low number of studies reporting each outcome.

Results

Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, 2 trials and 11 observational studies. Study numbers by outcome were: six BMD, six respiratory infections (four pneumonia, one tuberculosis (TB), one non-TB mycobacteria), one ocular disorder (cataracts) and no diabetes. BMD studies found conflicting results (three found loss of BMD and three found no loss), but were limited by study size, short follow-up and lack of generalisability. Studies addressing infection risk generally found positive associations but suffered from a lack of power, misclassification and selection bias. The one study which assessed ocular disorders found an increased risk of cataracts. Most studies were not able to fully adjust for known confounders, including oral corticosteroids.

Conclusion

There is a paucity of studies assessing systemic adverse effects associated with ICS use in asthma. Those studies that have been carried out present conflicting findings and are limited by multiple biases and residual confounding. Further appropriately designed studies are needed to quantify the magnitude of the risk for ICS-related systemic effects in people with asthma.

The Treatment of Mild and Moderate Asthma in Adults

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease that usually causes variable airway obstruction. It affects 5-10% of the German population.

METHODS

This review is based on relevant publications retrieved by a selective search, as well as on national and international guidelines on the treatment of mild and moderate asthma in adults.

RESULTS

The goal of treatment is to attain optimal asthma control with a minimal risk of exacerbations and mortality, loss of pulmonary function, and drug side effects. This can be achieved with a combination of pharmacotherapy and non-drug treatment including patient education, exercise, smoking cessation, and rehabilitation. Pharmacohterapy is based on inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and bronchodilators. It is recommended that mild asthma should be treated only when needed, either with a fixed combination of ICS and formoterol or with short-acting bronchodilators. For moderate asthma, maintenance treatment is recommended, with an inhaled fixed combinations of ICS and long-acting beta-mimetics, possibly supplemented with longacting anticholinergic agents. Allergen immunotherapy, i.e., desensitization treatment, should be considered if the allergic component of asthma is well documented and the patient is not suffering from uncontrolled asthma. Asthma control should be monitored at regular intervals, and the treatment should be adapted accordingly.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of asthma in adults should be individually tailored, with anti-inflammatory treatment as its main component.

Immune Modulation in Asthma: Current Concepts and Future Strategies

Asthma treatment concepts have profoundly changed over the last 20 years, from standard therapeutic regimens for all patients with asthma towards individually tailored interventions targeting treatable traits ("precision medicine"). A precise and highly effective immune modulation with minimal adverse effects plays a central role in this new concept. Recently, there have been major advances in the treatment of asthma with immune-modulatory compounds. One example is the approval of several highly potent biologics for the treatment of severe asthma. New immune-modulatory strategies are expected to enter clinical practice in the future; these innovations will be especially important for patients with treatment-resistant asthma.

Short-course systemic corticosteroids in asthma: striking the balance between efficacy and safety

Short courses of systemic corticosteroids (SCS), both oral and injectable, are very effective for the resolution of acute asthma symptoms, including exacerbations. However, the benefits of SCS, even short courses, must be balanced against the impact of their side-effects. While the adverse consequences of long-term use are widely recognised, there appears to be a perception in the medical community that short courses of SCS are safe. Limited but growing evidence in the literature suggests that even very brief dosing periods (3–7 days) of SCS are enough to cause significantly negative outcomes for patients. Short courses of SCS are associated with increased risk of adverse events including loss of bone density, hypertension and gastrointestinal ulcers/bleeds, in addition to serious impacts on mental health. Strategies to improve asthma control are recommended, including: 1) as-needed combination therapies in mild asthma; 2) risk factor reduction; 3) improving adherence/inhaler technique; 4) earlier initiation of add-on therapies; 5) use of biologics in appropriate patients; 6) development of new therapies to better control the disease; and 7) widespread education of the medical community. We propose that patients and primary care physicians should consider a cumulative SCS dose of 1 g per year as a highly relevant and easy-to-recall threshold.

Inappropriate use of systemic corticosteroids in asthma may add to disease burden. Even short-term, intermittent use is associated with health risks. Strategies to improve asthma control and reduce inappropriate use of systemic corticosteroids are needed. https://bit.ly/3bdieam