Early access to bedaquiline for extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and pre-XDR tuberculosis

QT Prolongation Associated with Administration of Bedaquiline, a Novel Anti-Tuberculosis Drug

Bedaquiline is a diarylquinoline compound that has recently been introduced and approved for use in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Its mechanism of action is inhibition of adenosine triphosphate-synthase. In combination with other antibiotics, bedaquiline-containing regimens administered for 6 months achieve cure rates of roughly 90%, in contrast to the previously used, 24-month-long WHO-recommended regimens for the treatment of MDR-TB. However, since its introduction, concerns have been raised about its effects on QT prolongation and its safety in routine clinical use. We reviewed the published experience regarding bedaquiline use, QT prolongation, and adverse cardiac events when the drug was used alone or in combination. Overall, data are reassuring that bedaquiline use in clinical practice is not associated with an excess of cardiac deaths or other clinically meaningful cardiac events. This review provides reassurance and support for the continued use of bedaquiline in the treatment of MDR-TB.

Bedaquiline-based treatment for extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa: A cost-effectiveness analysis

Background

The treatment success rate of conventional anti-tuberculosis (TB) regimens for extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) is low, resulting in high morbidity and healthcare cost especially in the high TB burden countries. Recent clinical findings reported improved treatment outcomes of XDR-TB with the bedaquiline (BDQ)-based regimens. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of BDQ-based treatment for XDR-TB from the perspective of the South Africa national healthcare provider.

Methods

A 2-year decision-analytic model was designed to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes of a hypothetical cohort of adult XDR-TB patients with (1) BDQ-based regimen and (2) injectable-based conventional regimen. The model inputs were retrieved from literature and public data. Base-case analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed. The primary model outputs included TB-related direct medical cost and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).

Results

In the base-case analysis, the BDQ group reduced 4.4152 DALYs with an incremental cost of USD1,606 when compared to the conventional group. The incremental cost per DALY averted (ICER) by the BDQ group was 364 USD/DALY averted. No influential factor was identified in the sensitivity analysis. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the BDQ group was accepted as cost-effective in 97.82% of the 10,000 simulations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 5,656 USD/DALY averted (1× gross domestic product per capita in South Africa).

Conclusion

The BDQ-based therapy appeared to be cost-effective and showed a high probability to be accepted as the preferred cost-effective option for active XDR-TB treatment.

Fully weekly antituberculosis regimen: a proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization recommends supervising the treatment of tuberculosis. Intermittent regimens have the potential to simplify the supervision and improve compliance. Our objective was to analyse the sterilising activity of once-weekly regimens based on drugs with a long half-life, bedaquiline and rifapentine, in a murine model of tuberculosis.

METHODS

300 Swiss mice were infected intravenously infected with ×10^-6 CFU Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Mice were treated once weekly with regimens containing: 1) bedaquiline, rifapentine and pyrazinamide (BPZ); 2) BPZ plus moxifloxacin (BPZM); 3) BPZM plus clofazimine (BPZMC); 4) the standard daily regimen of tuberculosis. All regimens were given for 4 or 6 months. Bactericidal and sterilising activity were assessed.

RESULTS

After 2 months of treatment, the mean count in lungs was 0.76±0.60 log₁₀ CFU in mice treated with the daily control regimen and negative in all mice treated with once-weekly regimens (p<0.05 compared to the daily control). All mice had negative lung cultures on completion of either 4 or 6 months of treatment, whereas 3 months after 4 and 6 months of treatment, respectively, the relapse rate was 64% and 13% in the standard daily regimen, 5% and 0% in BPZ, 0% and 0% in BPMZ and 0% and 5% in BPMZC (p<0.05 for all once-weekly regimens versus 4-month daily control; p>0.05 for all once-weekly regimens versus 6-month daily control).

CONCLUSIONS

BPZ-based once-weekly regimens have higher sterilising activity than the standard daily regimen and could greatly simplify treatment administration and possibly shorten the duration of tuberculosis treatment.

Bedaquiline and delamanid for drug-resistant tuberculosis: a clinician's perspective

Drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) represents a substantial threat to the global efforts to control this disease. After decades of stagnation, the treatment of drug-resistant TB is undergoing major changes: two drugs with a new mechanism of action, bedaquiline and delamanid, have been approved by stringent regulatory authorities and are recommended by the WHO. This narrative review summarizes the evidence, originating from both observational studies and clinical trials, which is available to support the use of these drugs, with a focus on special populations. Areas of uncertainty, including the use of the two drugs together or for prolonged duration, are discussed. Ongoing clinical trials are aiming to optimize the use of bedaquiline and delamanid to shorten the treatment of drug-resistant TB.