Sleep laboratories reopening and COVID-19: a European perspective

Level 2 Polysomnography for the Diagnosis of Sleep Disorders: A Health Technology Assessment

Background

It is estimated that half of Canadians have insufficient sleep, which over time is associated with poor physical and mental health. Currently, the only publicly funded option for the diagnosis of sleep disorders in Ontario is an in-person overnight sleep study, performed in a hospital or independent health facility (known as a level 1 polysomnography). Level 2 polysomnography has been proposed as an alternative that can be conducted at home for the diagnosis of suspected sleep disorders, if considered to have sufficient diagnostic accuracy. We conducted a health technology assessment of level 2 polysomnography for the diagnosis of suspected sleep disorders in adults and children, which included an evaluation of the test performance, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of publicly funding level 2 polysomnography, and the experiences, preferences, and values of people with suspected sleep disorders.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence to identify diagnostic accuracy, test failures and subjective measures of patient preferences. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study (using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies [QUADAS-2] tool) and the quality of the body of evidence (according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE] Working Group criteria). We performed a systematic literature search of economic evidence and conducted a primary economic evaluation and budget impact analysis to determine the cost-effectiveness and additional costs of publicly funding level 2 polysomnography for adults and children with suspected sleep disorders in Ontario. To contextualize the potential value of using level 2 polysomnography, we spoke with people with sleep disorders.

Results

We included 10 studies that reported on diagnostic accuracy and found level 2 polysomnography had sensitivity ranging between 0.76-1.0 and specificity ranging between 0.40-1.0 (GRADE: Moderate to Very low) when compared with level 1 polysomnography. Studies reported test failure rates from 0% to 20%, with errors present in both level 1 and level 2 tests conducted (GRADE: Very low). As well, some of these studies reported patients were found to have mixed opinions about their experiences, with more people preferring their experience with level 2 testing at home and having better quality of sleep compared with when they underwent level 1 testing (GRADE not conducted).Our primary economic evaluation showed that for adults with suspected sleep disorders, the new diagnostic pathway with level 2 polysomnography was equally effective (outcome: confirmed diagnosis at the end of the pathway) as the current practice diagnostic pathway with level 1 polysomnography. With the assumption of a lower technical fee for level 2 polysomnography, the new diagnostic pathway with level 2 polysomnography was less costly than the current practice diagnostic pathway (a saving of $27 per person with a wide 95% credible interval [95% CrI, -$137 to $121]), indicating that the results are highly uncertain. For children, a new diagnostic pathway with level 2 polysomnography was associated with additional costs (mean, $9.70; 95% CrI, -$125 to $190), and similarly, this estimate was highly uncertain.We estimated that the budget impact of publicly funding level 2 polysomnography for adults is uncertain and could range from savings of $22 million to additional costs of $43 million. Publicly funding a diagnostic pathway with level 2 polysomnography for children could result in additional costs of about $0.005 million over the next 5 years.People with whom we spoke reported that their sleep disorder negatively impacted their day-to-day lives, mental health, social and family relationships, and work. Participants who had experience with in-clinic (level 1) polysomnography described negative experiences they had at the clinic. Most people said they would prefer at-home (level 2) polysomnography over in-clinic (level 1) polysomnography, citing comfort and convenience as the main reasons; however, some people who have physical limitations preferred level 1 (in-clinic) polysomnography because they needed assistance to set up the equipment.

Conclusions

Level 2 polysomnography may have good test performance for adults and children, with adequate diagnostic accuracy, compared with level 1 polysomnography. The economic analyses showed that level 2 polysomnography for adults with suspected sleep disorders could be potentially cost saving but there is high uncertainty in the cost-effectiveness results. Given very limited information, the cost-effectiveness of this technology is also highly uncertain for children and young adults with suspected sleep disorders. The budget impact of publicly funding level 2 polysomnography for adults could range from savings of $22 million to additional costs of $43 million. Publicly funding level 2 polysomnography in children would require additional costs of about $0.005 million over the next 5 years. A clearer understanding of uptake of the technology, test costs, and the implementation pathway for adopting the technology is needed to improve the certainty of the cost-effectiveness and budget impact estimates. People with sleep disorders highlighted how important getting a diagnosis had been in order to be able to seek proper treatment for their sleep disorder and improve their lives. For many people with suspected sleep disorders, undergoing a sleep study at home would be a more comfortable and convenient option than undergoing a sleep study in clinic.

Application of bidirectional telemedicine in home CPAP for children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

BACKGROUND

Traditional telemedicine follow-up proves unsuitable for home continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy in children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Accompanying advancements in mobile internet, this study explores the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile communication and remote monitoring system as a novel bidirectional telemedicine approach to enhance adherence to home CPAP in children with OSAS.

METHODS

A prospective cohort utilizing bidirectional telemedicine follow-up from January to December 2022 (TM) was compared with a retrospective cohort receiving conventional phone follow-up from August 2018 to December 2021 (CP). Participants in TM group were subdivided into two groups based on the number of inquiries in the first week: a high-question group and a low-question group. The main endpoints included successful CPAP adaption and adherence at 2 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The TM group exhibited a significantly lower termination rate within 2 months compared to the CP group (1/24 vs. 6/22, p = 0.037). In the first week of home CPAP, the high-question group reported shorter average nightly usage and fewer days with usage of ≥4 h compared to the low-question group (5 h per night vs. 8.5 h per night, 4.5 days vs. 7 days, both p < 0.001). However, the high-question group showed significant improvement in adherence from the second week onward for the remainder of the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Bidirectional telemedicine represents an effective and feasible method to improve adherence to home CPAP therapy in children with OSAS. Considering the costs, researchers recommend applying bidirectional telemedicine for at least 1 week to better enhance long-term adherence.

Telemonitoring-guided ambulatory fixed CPAP titration versus ambulatory APAP titration in moderate obstructive sleep apnea: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

The present study aimed to evaluate whether titration of fixed continuous positive airway pressure at home using telemonitoring produces patient outcomes equal to auto-adjusting positive airway pressure titration at home for patients with moderate obstructive sleep apnea. Patients were randomized with a 1:1 allocation ratio to receive either auto-adjusting positive airway pressure titration based on the median of the 95th percentile pressure across seven nights or fixed continuous positive airway pressure titration based on a fixed calculated pressure and specific adaptations after telemonitoring of device data after 3 and 7 nights. The results of the ambulatory titration were evaluated with in-laboratory polysomnography after 2 weeks. We hypothesized that fixed continuous positive airway pressure titration would be non-inferior to auto-adjusting positive airway pressure titration in respect to continuous positive airway pressure adherence at a 3-month follow-up. A non-inferiority margin of -0.75 hr was prespecified. One-hundred and four patients were randomly allocated to fixed continuous positive airway pressure (n = 52) and auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (n = 52) titration. The mean difference and the 95% confidence intervals in continuous positive airway pressure adherence after 3 months between the two arms were 0.80 (-0.08, 1.69) hr. The non-inferiority hypothesis was confirmed as the lower one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the mean difference was above the prespecified margin. Patients in the fixed continuous positive airway pressure titration arm were titrated at significantly lower pressure level and had a significantly lower amount of average leaks compared with auto-adjusting positive airway pressure-titrated patients, while there was no difference in residual obstructive apnea-hypopnea index on polysomnography. Telemonitoring enables ambulatory continuous positive airway pressure titration with fixed pressure that is non-inferior to ambulatory titration with auto-adjusting pressure in patients with moderate obstructive sleep apnea.

ERS technical standards for using type III devices (limited channel studies) in the diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing in adults and children

For more than three decades, type III devices have been used in the diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing in supervised as well as unsupervised settings. They have satisfactory positive and negative predictive values for detecting obstructive and central sleep apnoea in populations with moderately high pre-test probability of symptoms associated with these events. However, standardisation of commercially available type III devices has never been undertaken and the technical specifications can vary widely. None have been subjected to the same rigorous processes as most other diagnostic modalities in the medical field. Although type III devices do not include acquisition of electroencephalographic signals overnight, the minimum number of physical sensors required to allow for respiratory event scoring using standards outlined by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine remains debatable. This technical standard summarises data on type III studies published since 2007 from multiple perspectives in both adult and paediatric sleep practice. Most importantly, it aims to provide a framework for considering current type III device limitations in the diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing while raising research- and practice-related questions aimed at improving our use of these devices in the present and future.

Sleep testing during the pandemic

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the U.S. healthcare system, reducing the capacity available for unrelated conditions, such as sleep disordered breathing, and increasing concerns about the safety of in-lab testing. This study characterizes how the pandemic impacted the assessment of sleep disordered breathing and use of associated services.

METHODS

Sleep testing claims occurring between January 2019 and June 2021 were extracted from the database of a national healthcare organization. Utilization was trended. Logistic regressions were run to assess the association between quarter of initial testing, whether testing was followed by treatment, and whether testing was followed by a clinical visit with a diagnosis related to sleep apnea, after controlling for patient-related factors. A Cox proportional hazards model assessed factors influencing time to treatment. Finally, a logistic regression assessed factors influencing the finality of home-based testing.

RESULTS

In Q2 2021, home-based testing utilization was 134% of its initial level, while in-lab and split night testing were both at 61% of initial levels. Patients receiving initial home-based testing did not significantly differ in their likelihood of treatment, but were significantly less likely to have a clinical visit for sleep apnea (P < 0.01). Patients initially tested in 2021 were treated significantly more quickly than those initially tested in Q1 2019. Home-based testing occurring in Q4 2019 or later was significantly more likely to be definitive than home-based testing occurring Q1 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

Home-based sleep testing increased significantly and durably in 2020, and was associated with faster time to treatment than initial in-lab testing.

Lessons for sleep medicine learned from the COVID-19 pandemic

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, sleep medicine services were dramatically reduced worldwide. Implementation of mitigation strategies was suggested by expert organisations and helped to restart sleep medicine services. Distance communication and monitoring during diagnosis, treatment initiation, and treatment follow-up have been used widely, in particular for patients with sleep apnoea. Follow-up studies demonstrate both advantages and potential disadvantages with the use of these new technologies. Emerging epidemiological evidence suggests that obstructive sleep apnoea may be an independent risk factor for adverse outcome in COVID-19, including an increased risk for hospitalisation and elevated mortality. Experimental studies explaining the underlying mechanisms behind these findings are warranted.

Treatment options in obstructive sleep apnea

Treatment of OSA with CPAP is currently the recommended treatment and has the greatest evidence of efficacy on AHI, symptoms and comorbidities. Symptomatic patients with moderate-severe OSA generally have good adherence to CPAP therapy, while those with mild OSA, female, young and generally paucisymptomatic, have lower CPAP adherence, especially in the medium and long term. The recent identification of different clinical and pathophysiological phenotypes of OSA has paved the way for alternative treatments to CPAP, leading to an increasingly personalized therapy. Weight loss and lifestyle modifications are highly recommended in all obese or overweight patients. Mandibular advancement devices (MAD), positional therapy (PT) and hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HSN) are recent and personalized alternative therapies on which there is promising and encouraging data but with still little strong scientific evidence. The purpose of this review is to compare the efficacy, adherence and costs of various therapeutic options for OSA patients in the light of recent evidence and to provide useful guidance for specialists.

Diagnosis of Sleep Apnoea Using a Mandibular Monitor and Machine Learning Analysis: One-Night Agreement Compared to in-Home Polysomnography

Background

The capacity to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) must be expanded to meet an estimated disease burden of nearly one billion people worldwide. Validated alternatives to the gold standard polysomnography (PSG) will improve access to testing and treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnosis of OSA, using measurements of mandibular movement (MM) combined with automated machine learning analysis, compared to in-home PSG.

Methods

40 suspected OSA patients underwent single overnight in-home sleep testing with PSG (Nox A1, ResMed, Australia) and simultaneous MM monitoring (Sunrise, Sunrise SA, Belgium). PSG recordings were manually analysed by two expert sleep centres (Grenoble and London); MM analysis was automated. The Obstructive Respiratory Disturbance Index calculated from the MM monitoring (MM-ORDI) was compared to the PSG (PSG-ORDI) using intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were constructed to optimise the diagnostic performance of the MM monitor at different PSG-ORDI thresholds (5, 15, and 30 events/hour).

Results

31 patients were included in the analysis (58% men; mean (SD) age: 48 (15) years; BMI: 30.4 (7.6) kg/m2). Good agreement was observed between MM-ORDI and PSG-ORDI (median bias 0.00; 95% CI −23.25 to + 9.73 events/hour). However, for 15 patients with no or mild OSA, MM monitoring overestimated disease severity (PSG-ORDI &lt; 5: MM-ORDI mean overestimation + 5.58 (95% CI + 2.03 to + 7.46) events/hour; PSG-ORDI &gt; 5–15: MM-ORDI overestimation + 3.70 (95% CI −0.53 to + 18.32) events/hour). In 16 patients with moderate-severe OSA (n = 9 with PSG-ORDI 15–30 events/h and n = 7 with a PSG-ORD &gt; 30 events/h), there was an underestimation (PSG-ORDI &gt; 15: MM-ORDI underestimation −8.70 (95% CI −28.46 to + 4.01) events/hour). ROC optimal cut-off values for PSG-ORDI thresholds of 5, 15, 30 events/hour were: 9.53, 12.65 and 24.81 events/hour, respectively. These cut-off values yielded a sensitivity of 88, 100 and 79%, and a specificity of 100, 75, 96%. The positive predictive values were: 100, 80, 95% and the negative predictive values 89, 100, 82%, respectively.

Conclusion

The diagnosis of OSA, using MM with machine learning analysis, is comparable to manually scored in-home PSG. Therefore, this novel monitor could be a convenient diagnostic tool that can easily be used in the patients’ own home.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04262557

Did COVID-19 impact Positive Airway Pressure adherence in 2020? A cross-sectional study of 8477 patients with sleep apnea

Background

Whether the COVID-19 pandemic impacts Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) adherence over the long-term is unknown and only preliminary short-term data have been reported.

Methods

With the aim of describing the impact of the first and second waves of COVID-19 on PAP adherence during 2020 in France, we designed a cross-sectional study of Sleep-Apnea (SA)-patients under PAP telemonitoring. To examine PAP adherence in adult SA patients, we assessed de-identified data from a non-profit healthcare provider database during the period January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020. Included patients met the following criteria: (i) PAP-treated for at least 4 months before January 1, 2019 and with continuous PAP during both 2019 and 2020; (ii) ≥ 360 daily PAP telemonitored data per year. For PAP adherence, data were collected using the PAP-software.

Results

8477/10482 patients were finally included in the analysis [72.4% male, median age 70 years (IQ_25–75: 61–77], 25.6% < 62 years old, initial Apnea–Hypopnea Index (AHI) of 41 (31–59)/h. Median PAP adherence was 7.21 (6.12–8.10) h/day in 2020 versus 7.12 (6.05–8.02) h/day in 2019, p < 0.001. The median difference in PAP adherence between the first 2020 lockdown and the corresponding 2019 weeks was 9.75 (CI_95% 8.75–10.75) min/day, p < 0.001. The median difference in PAP adherence between the second 2020 lockdown and the corresponding 2019 weeks was 5.00 (CI_95% 4.00–6.00) min/day, p < 0.001. If we consider the minimal clinically important difference of 30 min for PAP adherence, 30.4% and 26% of the patients increased their PAP adherence by at least 30 min during the first and second lockdowns respectively; 17.6% and 19.3% of the patients lowered their PAP adherence by at least 30 min in the first and second lockdowns, respectively.

Conclusion

During the first and second lockdowns, the COVID-19 pandemic had a clinically irrelevant effect on PAP adherence for the study population. Future studies are needed to describe COVID-19 pandemic impact on PAP adherence not only for long-term PAP-treated SA patients but also for incident cases.

Trial registration The COVADENE study was registered on March 1st, 2021 on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04775966)

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on home mechanical ventilation services: A national survey

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruption to healthcare services globally. We present the findings of a national survey of home mechanical ventilation (HMV) services in England and Wales. 30 HMV services (60%) responded. There was a significant reduction in outpatient services with 93% of services not offering routine face-to-face appointments, although most centres were able to offer emergency appointments for ventilation review and set-up. HMV inpatient capacity was reassigned, and HMV service staff re-deployed in the majority of centres (97%). The initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic left a service backlog of a median of 87 outpatient appointments [range 0–1500] and a median of 4 patients (range 0–100) awaiting NIV set-up.

Disrupted Sleep During a Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic affected sleep in several people. Though most of the studies argued that age, gender, employment, finances, responsibilities, and exposure to sunlight governed sleep-wake schedule and sleep disturbances, there is also scientific evidence to suggest that these issues could have aroused because of the infiltration of the central nervous system (CNS) by SARS-CoV-2. Sleep disturbances must be addressed during the pandemic as sleep disturbances and systemic inflammation run in a vicious cycle; quality of sleep and timing of vaccination can influence the immune response to vaccination and subjects having obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at higher risk for having SARS-CoV-2 infection-related complications.

Highlights of the ERS Lung Science Conference and Sleep and Breathing Conference 2021 and the new ECMC members

This article provides a brief description of some of the most remarkable sessions of the @EuroRespSoc Lung Science Conference and the Sleep and Breathing Conference 2021 and presents the new incoming members of the ECMC (@EarlyCareerERS) https://bit.ly/2RSDP40.

Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on sleep center operations and sleep apnea treatment in Korea: A multicenter survey

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has not only changed the lives of people around the world but also affected all areas of the healthcare system, including sleep medicine. However, no studies in Korea have investigated the status of domestic sleep centers and their challenges during the pandemic.An online survey was performed from December 2020 to January 2021. Hospitals that belonged to sleep-related academic societies and were considered well managed were included in this survey. The questionnaire focused on changes in sleep center operations, infection control policies, and patient treatment since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine and future directions for sleep medicine services were also investigated.Of the 20 sleep centers that responded, 80% were at university hospitals with more than 500 inpatient beds. During the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea (November-December 2020), the routine operating schedule of the sleep study room was reduced in 30% of the sleep centers compared to November-December 2019 (before COVID-19). The number of type 1 polysomnographies performed decreased in 85% of the sleep centers. In contrast, in-lab positive airway pressure (PAP) titrations decreased in 40%, remained unchanged in 35%, and increased in 25%. With respect to prescriptions, 30% of the sleep centers increased the number of prescriptions for auto-titrating continuous PAP. However, 60% of the sleep centers reported no change in the rate of fixed continuous PAP and auto-titrating continuous PAP prescriptions. All sleep centers that participated in this survey agreed that the need for documented infection control regulations will continue after the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the beginning of the pandemic, 30% of the centers have tried telemedicine. However, respondents expressed concern about telemedicine, citing a number of practical issues.Compared to countries where the COVID-19 pandemic was severe, Korea had less impact of COVID-19 on the sleep center operations and sleep apnea treatment. Infection and quality control in the sleep study room are important and inevitable issues, and regulation within each institution is necessary. Further research and discussion are needed regarding telemedicine and home sleep apnea test in Korea.

Sleep Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients: Prevalence, Risk Factors, Mechanisms, and Management

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to establish the prevalence of sleep dysfunction and psychological distress, identify predisposing and protective factors, and explore effective management strategies remains an important priority. Evidence to date suggests that a considerable proportion of COVID-19 patients experience significant sleep disturbances (estimated to afflict up to 50-75%) as well as psychological distress such as depression, anxiety, and traumatic stress. Duration of hospitalization, pre-existing mental health concerns, lower absolute lymphocyte count, and increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio have been all associated with a greater risk of sleep dysfunction in infected and hospitalized patients. Furthermore, in this review, we discuss the link between sleep deprivation, susceptibility to viral infections, and psychosocial wellbeing in relevance to COVID-19 and summarize the existing evidence regarding the presence and role of sleep apnea in infected individuals. Finally, we highlight the importance of suitable interventions in order to prevent and manage sleep dysfunction and avoid long-term physical and psychological implications. Future research should aim to provide high-quality information including in high risk, underserved, or difficult to reach populations and on the long-term consequences and effectiveness of applied interventions.

Sleep medicine and coronavirus disease 2019

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care of people with sleep disorders, to explore relationships between OSA and COVID-19, and to describe current knowledge of the effect of the pandemic on sleep globally.

RECENT FINDINGS

COVID-19 has led to significant changes in the practice of sleep medicine, including the care of patients with OSA. An OSA diagnosis may portend a worse prognosis with COVID-19, whilst prior COVID-19 may have an impact on sleep breathing.

SUMMARY

The pandemic has caused marked difficulties with access to diagnostic sleep studies and reduced capacity for CPAP initiation. Conversely, adherence to CPAP therapy may have improved, and use of remote consultations and telemonitoring has increased. An OSA diagnosis may be associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19, although any apparent relationship may be attributable to confounding factors, such as obesity and metabolic disease. Small studies have reported some increase in CPAP requirements in OSA patients following COVID-19 infection. More generally, the pandemic has been associated with a deterioration in subjective sleep quality across the population; much of this appears because of increased anxiety and stress. Finally, studies assessing putative links between COVID-19 and REM sleep issues are ongoing.

ATS Core Curriculum 2021. Adult Sleep Medicine: Sleep Apnea

The American Thoracic Society Sleep Core Curriculum updates clinicians on important sleep topics, presented during the annual meeting, and appearing in summary here. This year’s sleep core theme is sleep-disordered breathing and its management. Topics range from pathophysiological mechanisms for the association of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and metabolic syndrome, surgical modalities of OSA treatment, comorbid insomnia and OSA, central sleep apnea, and sleep practices during a pandemic. OSA has been associated with metabolic syndrome, independent of the role of obesity, and the pathophysiology suggests a role for sleep fragmentation and intermittent hypoxia in observed metabolic outcomes. In specific patient populations, surgical treatment modalities for OSA have demonstrated large reductions in objective disease severity compared with no treatment and may facilitate adherence to positive airway pressure treatment. Patient-centered approaches to comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea include evaluating for both OSA and insomnia simultaneously and using shared-decision making to determine the order and timing of positive airway pressure therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia. The pathophysiology of central sleep apnea is complex and may be due to the loss of drive to breathe or instability in the regulatory pathways that control ventilation. Pandemic-era sleep practices have evolved rapidly to balance safety and sustainability of care for patients with sleep-disordered breathing.

Continuum of care for patients with obstructive sleep apnea after one year from the COVID-19 pandemic onset: no time for further delays: practical issues for a safe and effective management

Since the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic onset, many routine medical activities have been put on hold and this has deeply affected the management of patients with chronic diseases such as obstructive sleep apnea. Untreated OSA is associated with increased mortality and difficulties in social functioning. A delay in initiating treatment may therefore have harmful consequences. Between February and April 2020, the so-called first wave of the pandemic, the overall activity of sleep centers in Europe was reduced by 80%. As the international infection control authorities released guidelines for SARS-CoV-2 outbreak control, many of the national sleep societies provided strategies for a gradual re-opening of sleep facilities. Most of these strategies were not evidences-based and, in a climate of general concern, worldwide it was strongly advised to post-pone any non-urgent sleep-related procedure. Despite the initial idea that the outbreak could be transient, after one year it is still ongoing and the price we are paying, not only includes deaths caused by COVID-19, but also deaths caused by missed or late diagnosis. As further delays in diagnosing and treating patients with sleep apnea are no more acceptable, a new arrangement of sleep facilities and resources, in order to operate safely and effectively, is now mandatory. In this article, we review most recent literature and guidelines in order to provide practical advice for a new arrangement of sleep laboratories and the care of patients with obstructive sleep apnea after one year from the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Telemedicine in Sleep-Disordered Breathing: Expanding the Horizons

Interest in telemedicine has increased exponentially. There is a growing body of published evidence on the use of telemedicine for patients using continuous positive airway pressure. Telemedicine-ready devices can support the transmission on use time, apnea-hypopnea index, and leakage. This approach enables early activation of troubleshooting. Automated, personalized feedback for patients and patient access to their own data provide unprecedented opportunities for integrating comanagement approaches, multiactor interactions, and patient empowerment. Telemedicine is likely cost effective, but requires better evidence. Notwithstanding barriers for implementation that remain, telemedicine has to be embraced, leaving the physician and patient to accept it or not.

Prolonged Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Sleep Medicine Services-Longitudinal Data from the Swedish Sleep Apnea Registry

The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has affected the operation of health care systems. The direct impact of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on COVID-19 infection outcome remains to be elucidated. However, the coincidence of common risk factors for OSA and severe COVID-19 suggests that patients with OSA receiving positive airway pressure therapy may have an advantage relative to those untreated when confronted with a COVID-19 infection. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has led to a substantial reduction of sleep medicine services, and the long-term consequences may be considerable. New strategies for the management of sleep disorders are needed to overcome the current underdiagnosis and delay of treatment.