Adrenal function recovery after durable oral corticosteroid sparing with benralizumab in the PONENTE study

Efficacy and safety of benralizumab in elderly patients with severe eosinophilic asthma

Background

Biologics are the important drugs for severe asthma, but clinical trials included few elderly patients. Data on the safety and efficacy of benralizumab in elderly asthma patients are limited.

Methods

This clinical study was a multicentre, retrospective, observational study at two hospitals. Patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with severe asthma treated with benralizumab were included. Elderly patients were defined as those aged 70 years or older. Efficacy and safety were then analyzed in elderly and non-elderly patients. The primary endpoints were the annual number of asthma exacerbations for efficacy and the discontinuation rate due to adverse events for safety.

Results

Between August 2016 and October 2022, 61 patients were enrolled; 10 patients were excluded, and 51 (22 elderly, 29 non-elderly) patients were analyzed. In elderly patients, the annual number of asthma exacerbations before treatment with benralizumab (pre-benralizumab) was 3.78, and the number during treatment with benralizumab was 1.26, a decrease of 2.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 3.74, p < 0.001). In non-elderly patients, the annual number of asthma exacerbation in the pre-benralizumab period was 3.24, and during treatment with benralizumab it was 0.68, a decrease of 2.56 (95% CI, 1.3 to 3.82, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events (elderly vs non-elderly, 2 (9%) vs 0 (0%), p = 0.18).

Conclusion

Benralizumab reduced the annual number of asthma exacerbations and was well tolerated in elderly patients.

The clinical effectiveness of mepolizumab treatment in severe eosinophilic asthma; outcomes from four years cohort evaluation

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials and real world studies demonstrated benefit of mepolizumab treatment in severe asthma but data on its effectiveness beyond 2 years remain limited. Herein, we provide mepolizumab treatment evaluation up to 4 years.

METHODS

we studied all patients initiated on mepolizumab in our center from June 2017 to August 2018. Clinical outcomes data were retrieved from the local dendrite systems registry. Comparison analyses and logistic regression were conducted to explore longevity and predictors of response to mepolizumab treatment.

RESULTS

a total of 66 patients initiated on mepolizumab with a median follow-up of 45.8 (42.4,48.1) months were included in the study [mean age 50.3 years (range 18-79), females 50 (73%) ]. At 20.7 months of treatment, 42 patients (63.6%) had positive response, 13 (19.7%) negative response, and 11 (16.7%) discontinued due to other factors. At 45.8 months, 35 (53%) patients were still on mepolizumab, 21 (31.8%) switched to a different biologic, and 10 (15.2%) discontinued biologics. Two deaths were recorded during the study period.The median blood eosinophil was reduced from 0.43x109/L (0.27, 0.75) to 0.04 (0.0, 0.1) (p < 0.00001)]. The median annual exacerbations were reduced from 6.0 (4,8) to 1.0 (0.0,3.0) (p < 0.00001), and mOCS use was reduced from59% to 29%, p = 0.001. The mean asthma control questionnaire-6 (ACQ6) improved from 3.1 ± 1.7 to 2.1 ± 1.3 (p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

mepolizumab clinical benefit was sustained over 4 years. However, approximately half of the cohort discontinued the treatment prompting the need for further research into the treatment response longevity.

Long-term efficacy of dupilumab in severe asthma by baseline oral corticosteroid dose

Background

Dupilumab has been shown to improve clinical outcomes long term while reducing oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose in patients with severe OCS-dependent asthma. This post hoc analysis assesses the impact of OCS dose at baseline (≤10 or >10 mg·day-1) on long-term outcomes of dupilumab treatment.

Methods

Annualised severe asthma exacerbation rates, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), measures of asthma control and quality of life, and OCS dose were evaluated in patients from the phase 3 VENTURE trial with severe OCS-dependent asthma, further categorised by OCS dose ≤10 or >10 mg·day-1 at parent study baseline (PSBL), who enrolled in TRAVERSE.

Results

Dupilumab reduced the annualised exacerbation rate in VENTURE, and it remained low throughout TRAVERSE (0.202-0.265 (OCS ≤10 mg·day-1 at PSBL) and 0.221-0.366 (OCS >10 mg·day-1 at PSBL)). Improvements in pre-bronchodilator FEV1, asthma control and quality of life observed in VENTURE dupilumab patients were sustained throughout TRAVERSE. Patients on placebo during VENTURE showed rapid improvements in FEV1 upon initiating dupilumab in TRAVERSE, which were sustained to the end of TRAVERSE. Reductions in OCS dose observed in VENTURE were maintained throughout TRAVERSE, with more than two-thirds of patients achieving reductions in OCS doses to ≤5 mg·day-1 by TRAVERSE week 48.

Conclusions

Improvements in clinical outcomes and reductions in OCS dose with dupilumab observed in VENTURE were maintained throughout TRAVERSE, regardless of baseline disease severity. Patients who switched from placebo in VENTURE to dupilumab in TRAVERSE had improved clinical outcomes and reductions in OCS dose comparable to those given dupilumab in VENTURE.

Systemic Corticosteroids for Treating Respiratory Diseases: Less Is Better, but… When and How Is It Possible in Real Life?

Systemic corticosteroids (CSs), a keystone in pulmonology, are drugs with strong antiinflammatory activity. They are cheap, easily available, and accessible, but with common and serious side effects. Moreover, the use of exogenous CSs may suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, predisposing to adrenal insufficiency. Safe CS treatment is a challenge of pharmacological research. This narrative review examined the indications of CSs in some respiratory diseases, analyzing what types, dosages, and length of treatment are required as the dosage and duration of CS treatments need to be minimized. Chronic maintenance treatments with CSs are associated with poor prognosis, but they are still prescribed in patients with severe asthma, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and interstitial lung diseases. When CS discontinuation is not possible, all efforts should be made to achieve clinically meaningful reductions. Guidelines suggest the use of methylprednisolone at a dose of 20-40 mg/day or equivalent for up to 10 days in subjects with COVID-19 pneumonia (but not other respiratory viral diseases) and respiratory failure, exacerbations of asthma, and COPD. Some guidelines suggest that CS treatment shorter than 10-14 days can be abruptly stopped, strictly monitoring subjects with unexplained symptoms after CS withdrawal, who should promptly be tested for adrenal insufficiency (AI) and eventually treated. CSs are often used in severe community-acquired pneumonia associated with markedly increased serum inflammation markers, in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in septic shock unresponsive to hydro-saline replenishment and vasopressors, and acute exacerbations of interstitial lung diseases. As these cases often require higher doses and longer duration of CS treatment, CS tapering should be gradual and, when useful, supported by an evaluation of HPA axis function.

Benralizumab affects NK cell maturation and proliferation in severe asthmatic patients

INTRODUCTION

The mechanism of action of benralizumab is determined by its afucosylated constant fragment that binds CD16a receptors on the membrane of natural killer cells. Here we analysed changes in Natural Killer and T-cells in Severe asthmatic patients, before and after benralizumab..

METHODS

Natural Killer and T-cell subsets were detected through multiparametric flow cytometry. The concentrations of serum cytokines levels were detected through multiplex assay. Functional proliferation assay was performed in follow-up samples in severe asthmatic patients.

RESULTS

At baseline, severe asthmatic patients showed higher percentages of immature Natural Killer cells when compared with healthy controls. We demonstrate the proliferative capacity of these cells and their activation after benralizumab administration. Benralizumab shifted Natural Killer cell phenotypes towards maturity. Correlation between the Natural Killer cells and functional parameters and with steroid-sparing was observed.

CONCLUSION

Together this data contributes to our understanding of the mechanisms of action of benralizumab in the resolution of inflammation in severe asthma patients.

Independent risk factors of asthma exacerbations: 3-year follow-up in a single-center prospective cohort study

Background

Because minimizing future risk is the goal of asthma chronic asthma management, it is particularly important to identify risk factors. We conducted this 3-year single-center prospective cohort study to determine the independent risk factors of asthma exacerbations (AEs).

Methods

We performed this prospective, longitudinal, observational study with a 3-year follow-up on 257 patients aged 18-81 years with at least a 1-year history of asthma. Follow-up visits are conducted through regular annual phone calls, and the primary endpoints were AE.

Results

The uncontrolled group was more likely to develop AE than the well-controlled group [odds ratio (OR): 6.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-35.21, P<0.05]. Patients with low Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores were more likely to develop AE than these with high AQLQ scores (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.35-0.99, P<0.05). AQLQ and Asthma Control Questionnaires (ACQ) were both strong independent risk factors within 3 years of enrollment; the cut-off values (COV) of the AQLQ and the ACQ (uncontrolled) that better evaluated the risk with the AE were ≤5.4 and >1, respectively. The AQLQ scores had a sensitivity of 79.07% and a specificity of 59.09% [area under curve (AUC): 0.70, P<0.0001], and the ACQ (uncontrolled) had a sensitivity of 81.4% and a specificity of 52.29% (AUC 0.68, P<0.0001).

Conclusions

The findings of this study suggest that patients with uncontrolled asthma and a diminished health-related quality of life had an increased risk of exacerbations in the future. Defining these risk factors associated with AE is important as it will identify these at the highest risk to patients and may guide future interventions.