Treatment burden associated with the intake of thickened fluids

Improving swallowing function with thickening agents in post-stroke oropharyngeal dysphagia: a real-world experience

INTRODUCTION

Post-stroke dysphagia (PSD) is a widely prevalent and possibly life-threatening consequence that may lead to aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, dehydration, and higher mortality risk. Recommending thickened fluids (TF) is a longstanding practice in the management of dysphagia. Augmenting liquid viscosity with a xanthan gum-based thickener benefits patients with PSD by aiding in the enhancement of bolus control, facilitating improved coordination in the swallowing mechanism, and lowering the risk of aspiration. Despite the widespread use of TF, limited high-quality evidence supports its benefits in PSD.

CASE REPORT

This manuscript presents the clinical experience with four varied cases of PSD. A comprehensive approach to management with TF decreased the risk of aspiration pneumonia and facilitated effective management of dietary recommendations both during hospitalization and after discharge (all Cases). In addition, TF maintained nutrition and hydration in patients with multiple hospital admissions (Case 2), maintained hydration in those unable to engage in swallow rehabilitation due to complex medical conditions (Cases 2, 3, and 4), and those who needed slow and longer recovery due to long-term risk of silent aspiration (Cases 2, 3, and 4). In one case (Case 4), the use of TF was extended for more than two years post-stroke with no reported incidence of chest infection.

CONCLUSION

In routine clinical practice, a comprehensive management approach with xanthan gum-based TFs reduces the risk of aspiration and aspiration pneumonia in patients with PSD while maintaining nutritional and hydration and improving swallowing function based on formal instrumental assessments. This clinical experience highlights the pivotal role of instrumental assessment, patient education, and informed decision-making to optimize outcomes with TF.

Nutritional and hydration interventions for people with dysphagia

Dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) is particularly common in older people and is associated with various health conditions. Dysphagia affects an individual's ability to eat and drink, and can have a significant effect on their clinical outcomes and quality of life. This article explores ways in which nurses can support people with dysphagia to minimise the effects of the condition and enhance their quality of life. The authors examine the role of commonly used strategies such as dietary texture modification and thickened fluids that aim to optimise nutrition and hydration. However, some of the management options for dysphagia do not have a strong evidence base, so nurses should consider whether any dietary restrictions are proportionate and ensure that their benefits outweigh the risks.

Alterations and Preservations: Practices and Perspectives of Speech-Language Pathologists Regarding the Intervention of Thickened Liquids for Swallowing Problems

PURPOSE

The intervention of thickened liquids (TL) is commonly used to reduce aspiration in people with dysphagia. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) have traditionally believed it is an effective intervention. Recent articles highlight limited evidence, poor acceptance, and a variety of unintended consequences. This study explores if current debates have been reflected in SLP practices and perspectives.

METHOD

An e-survey was developed. Participants were recruited via professional associations in Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to explore the data. Principal component analysis was used to summarize SLP practices and perspectives.

RESULTS

The 370 respondents represented mainly experienced, confident, hospital-based clinicians. While 20% of respondents frequently recommend TL, 61% believe it to be a burdensome treatment. "Best treatment" and "It works" beliefs continue to underpin decision making. Those who recommend TL most often are most influenced by penetration, coughing, and their own clinical experience. They are more likely to believe TL is evidence based and effective, reduces aspiration, and improves hydration. Person-centeredness is important among all respondents, although significant numbers would implement TL against patient wishes. Improvements in aspiration status and quality of life rank highly as reasons to discontinue TL.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that fewer respondents are regularly using TL. Divergent groups are evident with those frequently employing and believing in the efficacy of TL and those who do not. While current debates are influencing practice, there clearly remains a significant number of SLPs continuing to recommend TL. This study's findings highlight both alterations and preservations in the discipline's approach to TL and calls for SLPs to reframe our thinking regarding this intervention as well as consider alternative options in this treatment space.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24317110.

Exploring the interaction of viscosity and nipple design on feeding performance in an infant pig model

Infant feeding behaviors are modulated via sensorimotor feedback, such that sensory perturbations can significantly impact performance. Properties of the nipple and milk (e.g., nipple hole size and viscosity) are critical sources of sensory information. However, the direct effects of varying milk and nipple properties on infant motor output and the subsequent changes in feeding performance are poorly understood. In this study, we use an infant pig model to explore the interaction between nipple hole size and milk viscosity. Using high-speed videofluoroscopy and electromyography, we measured key performance metrics including sucks per swallow and suck duration, then synchronized these data with the onset and offset of activity of jaw opening and closing muscles. The combination of a small nipple hole and thick milk resulted in negative effects on both suck and swallow performance, with reduced feeding efficiency compared to the other treatments. It also appears that this combination of viscosity and hole size disrupts the coordination between correlates of tongue and jaw movements. We did not see a difference in feeding efficiency between viscosities when infants fed on the large-hole nipple, which may be the result of non-Newtonian fluid mechanics. Our results emphasize the importance of considering both fluid and nipple properties when considering alterations to an infant's feeding system.

Implementation of a free water protocol at a long term acute care hospital

This feasibility study aimed to trial a Free Water Protocol (FWP) for patients with thin liquid dysphagia in the Long-Term Acute Care Hospital (LTACH) setting. Patients with dysphagia are often prescribed thickened liquids to avoid or mitigate aspiration. While this clinical intervention can minimize the risk of aspiration pneumonia (PNA), it is generally not well received by patients. As such, the goal of this study was to determine if patients who knowingly aspirate thin liquids can safely tolerate thin liquid water, and if so, to what degree of benefit. The study assessed for adverse events, fluid intake, hydration status, quality of life, and overall swallow function outcomes. These measurements were taken over a 7 day trial period using inventories, lab work, clinical judgment, and observation. Ten participants were enrolled in this study with 9 having sufficient data for analysis (n = 9). No adverse events related to the FWP were observed, and patients saw improved total fluid intake (P = 0.0074), swallow-related quality of life (P = 0.0273), and overall swallow function (P = 0.0002). The results in this feasibility study allowed for the hospital wide implementation of the FWP and laid out the groundwork for future studies looking at longitudinal effects of a FWP.

Ethical considerations in the care of people with eating, drinking and swallowing difficulties

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Eating, drinking and swallowing difficulties are low on the list of clinical headlines. Until something affects the process and then we see how pervasive and devastating such issues are. Recent guidelines have been published looking at national competencies to be structured into preregistration education. Professional bodies have addressed the topic from a risk perspective, which may be counter to the patient-centred approach of shared decision making. Our review places the literature in the wider, historical context of bioethics and our experience regarding ethical challenges as we strive to support our patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature addressing ethical care for a person with eating, drinking and swallowing difficulties, highlights shared decision-making. This is guided by patient preference, professional roles and approaches, cultural context and informed consent. Studies highlight the importance of appropriate communication and documentation, and ethical decision-making steps.

SUMMARY

We hope to widen clinicians' perspectives and reflection on factors influencing these challenges (including own biases), and how to address them so that the patient and the clinician are satisfied. Ethical approaches require skills and knowledge, and critically also time. Resources should be allocated at the service level to ensure a robust process of informed consent and decision making.