Improving asthma control in patients suboptimally controlled on inhaled steroids and long-acting beta2-agonists: addition of montelukast in an open-label pilot study

Comparison between montelukast and tiotropium as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2-agonist in for patients with asthma

Objective: Asthma often remains uncontrolled despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) alone or with ICS plus a long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA). The recommended alternative is the addition of either montelukast or tiotropium. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of montelukast and tiotropium on airway inflammation and remodeling in persistent asthma. Methods: Eighty-seven patients with asthma were treated with budesonide and formoterol (640/18 μg); then, the patients were randomly allocated to three groups to receive oral montelukast (10 mg/day), inhaled tiotropium (5 μg/day), or no add-on to the maintenance therapy for 48 weeks. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and pulmonary function were measured, and quantitative computed tomography was performed. Results: Compared to the maintenance therapy, add-on montelukast significantly decreased FeNO (p < 0.05) and improved airflow obstruction (p < 0.05), whereas airway dimensions remained unchanged. Changes in FeNO were significantly correlated with changes in FEV₁ (r = -0.71, p < 0.001). In contrast, the addition of tiotropium significantly decreased airway wall area corrected for body surface area (WA/BSA) (p < 0.05), decreased wall thickness (T/√BSA) (p < 0.05) and improved airflow obstruction (p < 0.05) with no change in FeNO. Changes in WA/BSA and T/√BSA were significantly correlated with the change in percentage predicted FEV₁ (r = -0.84, p < 0.001 and r = -0.59, p < 0.01, respectively). Conclusions:Adding either montelukast or tiotropium to ICS/LABA may provide additive benefits with respect to the pulmonary function and airway inflammation or remodeling in patients with asthma.

Vitamin D supplementation improves FEV1 in patients of Bronchial Asthma

Background and Objective

Vitamin D deficiency has strong association with various respiratory disorders in which bronchial asthma is one of them. The objective was to determine the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in cases with bronchial asthma.

Methods

This case control study was conducted at private clinical set up of district, Rahim Yar Khan from August to October 2016 in which 100 cases of bronchial asthma were randomly divided into Group-A and Group-B each contained 50 patients. Group-A was given placebo and Group-B with vitamin D in a dose of 50,000 units per day orally. Both the groups were followed in terms of improvement in FEV1 at 1, 2 and 3 months.

Results

There was no significant difference in both groups in terms of BMI and duration of asthma at start of study. The mean pre treatment vitamin D level of Group-A was 14.23±1.66 and of Group-B, 15.30±2.05 ng/dl (p= 0.23). FEV1 in pre treatment Group-A was 64.35±3.16 and of Group-B was 62.35±2.16 with p= 0.95. There was no significant difference in terms of FEV1 in both the groups at one month (p= 0.32). While at two months it was significantly higher in Group-B with p= 0.04. At 3 months the final outcome was seen where the post treatment FEV1 in Group-A was 66.13±2.75 and in Group-B, 75.15±2.04 with p value of 0.001.

Conclusion

Vitamin D supplementation improves FEV1 significantly at two months and these can be even highly significant if it is extended up to 3 months.

The Effect of Combined Therapy ICS/LABA and ICS/LABA plus Montelukast in Patients with Uncontrolled Severe Persistent Asthma Based on the Serum IL-13 and FEV1

BACKGROUND

IL-13 is one of many cytokines responsible for the chronic inflammation of asthma.

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of combined therapy ICS/LABA and ICS/LABA plus Montelukast in patients with uncontrolled severe persistent asthma by analyzing of serum IL-13 and FEV1 before the treatment and after 6 months of therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In study we included two groups. First group with 27 patients were treated with ICS/LABA. Second group with 29 patients were treated with ICS/LABA plus Montelukast. In each of them were measured serum IL-13 levels by the ELISA method and FEV1 before and after 6 months of treatment. Results were statistically analyzed according to the Wilcoxon Pairs Test and T-test.

RESULTS

The obtained results in both groups showed that the serum IL-13 before the start of therapy were much higher and after 6 months of treatment significantly reduces their value, which in the second group were more expressed. The difference in the average value of FEV1 in both groups before and after therapy was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with ICS/LABA plus Montelukast proved superior compared to therapy of ICS/LABA in patients with uncontrolled severe persistent asthma and allows achievement of well controlled of asthma with subjective clinical improvement.

Management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with combination inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-agonists: a review of comparative effectiveness research

The value of combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-agonists (ICS/LABA) is well recognized in the management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Despite differences in the pharmacological properties between two well-established ICS/LABA products (budesonide/formoterol and fluticasone/salmeterol), data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses suggest that these two products perform similarly under RCT conditions. In contrast, a few recently reported real-world comparative effectiveness studies have suggested that there are substantial differences between ICS/LABA combination treatments in terms of clinical and healthcare outcomes in patients with asthma or COPD. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief review of the benefits, as well as the limitations, of comparative effectiveness research (CER) in the therapeutic area of asthma and COPD. We conducted a structured literature review of the current CER studies on ICS/LABA combinations in asthma and COPD. These articles were then used to illustrate the unique challenges of CER studies, providing a summary of study results and limitations. We focus particularly on difficult biases and confounding factors that may be introduced before, during, and after the initiation of therapy. Beyond being a review of these two ICS/LABA combination treatments, this article is intended to help those who wish to assess the quality of CER published projects in asthma and COPD, or guide investigators who wish to design new CER studies for chronic respiratory disease treatments.

Assessment of various second-line medications in addition to inhaled corticosteroid in asthma patients: a randomized controlled trial

Many patients with persistent asthma cannot achieve the treatment goal for asthma with a single controller medication. The aim of the present study was to assess lung function and rescue medication use in asthma patients receiving four different categories of drugs in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid. Patients recruited to the study were randomized into four groups to receive budesonide with either formoterol, doxofylline, montelukast or tiotropium for a period of 3 months. Lung function (i.e. forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 )) and rescue medication use were determined at baseline and on Day 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 of treatment. A total of 297 patients completed the study. At baseline, no significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in any of the outcome measures. Significant within-group improvement in FEV1 was observed in all groups. On Day 90, between-group differences showed that the improvement in FEV1 was significantly (P < 0.05) higher for patients receiving budesonide + formoterol, followed by budesonide + montelukast and budesonide + doxofylline, and least for those receiving budesonide + tiotropium. Similarly, within- and between-group comparisons showed significant (P < 0.05) reductions in rescue medication use in all groups. However, the magnitude of the decrease was greater in the budesonide + formoterol group, followed by the budesonide + montelukast, budesonide + doxofylline and budesonide + tiotropium groups. Based on our findings, among the second-line treatment regimens, budesonide with either montelukast or doxofylline was found to be better than budesonide + tiotropium in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. Further studies with a longer duration are likely to be useful.

Effect of vitamin D3 on mild to moderate persistent asthmatic patients: A randomized controlled pilot study

Background:

Asthma is a common chronic inflammatory disease of the bronchial airways. Well defined treatment options for asthma are very few. The role of vitamin D₃ on asthma is still baffling. Aim: We have examined the effect of vitamin D₃ supplementation in mild to moderate persistent asthma patients.

Materials and Methods:

We conducted an open labeled, randomized comparative trial in 48 asthma patients. The study duration was about 90 days. The study had a run-in-period of 2 weeks. At the end of run-in-period, patients were divided into two groups: Usual care group (n = 31) patients received budesonide and formoterol and intervention care group (n = 32) patients received vitamin D₃ supplementation along with their regular medicine.

Results:

The primary outcome of the study was to measure the improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁). Patients in both groups had a significant improvement in FEV₁ at the end of the study. The mean difference in percentage predicted FEV₁ in usual care and intervention care group was 4.95 and 7.07 respectively.

Conclusion:

The study concluded that adjunctive therapy of vitamin D₃ is effective in asthma patients. The present study will be an evidence based report; however, future studies are warranted in longer duration of time to substantiate the present findings.

Pulmonary function assessment in mild to moderate persistent asthma patients receiving montelukast, doxofylline, and tiotropium with budesonide: a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

There is no comparative study among asthma patients receiving first-line versus various second-line treatment regimens for mild to moderate persistent asthma.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the pulmonary function in asthma patients receiving montelukast, doxofylline, and tiotropium with budesonide in a pilot group.

METHODS

Patients were recruited as per the study criteria and randomly allocated to 4 groups to receive budesonide (400 µg) with formoterol (12 µg), doxofylline (400 mg), montelukast (10 mg), or tiotropium (18 µg) for a period of 3 months. Outcomes included forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and rescue medication use.

RESULTS

A total of 167 patients were recruited; among them, 123 patients completed the study. At baseline, no significant difference (P > 0.05) was observed in any of the outcome measures. Significant within-group improvement in FEV1 was observed in all the groups. At day 90, between-group difference revealed that improvement in FEV1 was significantly (P < 0.05) high for budesonide plus formoterol followed by budesonide plus doxofylline, budesonide plus montelukast, and, lastly, budesonide plus tiotropium. Similarly, within-group comparison revealed a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in rescue medication use in all the groups. The intensity in decrease was more in budesonide plus formoterol group followed by budesonide plus doxofylline, budesonide plus montelukast, and budesonide plus tiotropium groups.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of our findings, among the second-line treatment regimens, budesonide plus doxofylline and budesonide plus montelukast was found to be better than budesonide plus tiotropium in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma. Further studies with a larger sample size are likely to be useful.

Addition of a 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein inhibitor to an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or an ICS/long-acting beta-2-agonist combination in subjects with asthma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical benefits of 'add-on' therapy with GSK2190915 in combination with the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) fluticasone propionate (FP) and the ICS/long-acting beta 2 agonist (LABA) combination FP/salmeterol in asthmatic subjects.

METHODS

Both studies were cross-over, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy and placebo-controlled in subjects with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) best of >50 and ≤80% of predicted. Add-on to ICS: Subjects (n = 162) aged ≥12 years received FP 100 µg twice daily (BID) plus GSK2190915 100 mg once daily (QD); GSK2190915 300 mg QD; montelukast 10 mg QD; salmeterol 50 µg BID or placebo. Add-on to ICS/LABA: Female subjects (n = 145) aged ≥18 years received FP/salmeterol 250/50 µg BID plus GSK2190915 300 mg QD, montelukast 10 mg QD or placebo. In both studies, the primary endpoint was trough FEV1 at the end of the treatment period. Secondary endpoints included a range of objective and patient-reported measures of efficacy.

RESULTS

Add-on to ICS: There was no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint between either dose of GSK2190915 (add-on to FP) and placebo. Nominally statistically significant increases were demonstrated for GSK2190915 300 mg add-on relative to placebo for mean morning peak expiratory flow (p = 0.049), percentage of symptom-free days (p = 0.035) and percentage of symptom-free 24 h periods (p = 0.030). Add-on to ICS/LABA: There were no statistically significant differences on the primary endpoint between treatment regimens. Nominally statistically significant decreases were demonstrated in daytime (p = 0.023), night-time (p = 0.041) and 24 h (p = 0.019) short-acting beta 2 agonist usage with FP/salmeterol + GSK2190915 300 mg vs. FP/salmeterol + placebo.

CONCLUSION

There was no clinically significant improvement in the primary endpoint following GSK2190915 add-on treatment; however, improvements in a range of secondary endpoints and biomarker data provided evidence of pharmacological activity. Improvements in response to background treatment may have been a limitation in both studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT01156792 and NCT01248975.

Effects of add-on montelukast on airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with well-controlled asthma - a pilot study

Objective

Control of airway inflammation is the cornerstone of asthma management. The aim of the present pilot study was to assess the effects of a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) added to a basic treatment of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) on airway hyperresponsiveness, inflammation, and quality of life in well-controlled patients with asthma.

Research design and methods

Seventeen patients (age 18–65, 11 women) with well-controlled asthma presenting airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol and methacholine challenge were given add-on montelukast on a stable ICS + LABA for 4 weeks. Quality of life and selected parameters of airway inflammation were measured at baseline and at study end. (ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01725360)).

Results

Adding montelukast to ICS + LABA resulted in an increase in mean FEV₁ (+4.5%, p = 0.057), cumulated higher dose of mannitol (+32.5%, p = 0.023) and methacholine (+17.2%, 0.237) in the provocation test, lower airway reactivity with mannitol and methacholine (response dose ratio (RDR) –50.0%, p = 0.024 and –44.3%, p = 0.006, respectively), and improved airway sensitivity to mannitol and methacholine (+12.1%, p = 0.590 and +48.0%, p = 0.129 for PD15 and PD20 FEV₁, respectively). Changes in inflammation parameters (blood eosinophil count, serum eosinophil cationic protein, and exhaled nitric oxide) were consistent with these findings. Asthma-related quality of life improved significantly in all domains and overall (from 5.3 at baseline to 6.1 at the final visit, p < 0.001). The main limitation was the absence of a control group.

Conclusion

The consistency of the changes in airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation as well as in quality of life observed with an add-on therapy with montelukast in well-controlled asthma patients during 4 weeks suggests that residual inflammation may represent an area for further improvement of asthma control to be explored in adequately powered randomized controlled trials.

The asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome: pharmacotherapeutic considerations

Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap syndrome (ACOS) is a commonly encountered yet loosely defined clinical entity. ACOS accounts for approximately 15-25% of the obstructive airway diseases and patients experience worse outcomes compared with asthma or COPD alone. Patients with ACOS have the combined risk factors of smoking and atopy, are generally younger than patients with COPD and experience acute exacerbations with higher frequency and greater severity than lone COPD. Pharmacotherapeutic considerations require an integrated approach, first to identify the relevant clinical phenotype(s), then to determine the best available therapy. The authors discuss the array of existing and emerging classes of drugs that could benefit those with ACOS and share their therapeutic approach. A consensus international definition of ACOS is needed to design prospective, randomized clinical trials to evaluate specific drug interventions on important outcomes such as lung function, acute exacerbations, quality of life and mortality.

Montelukast for the treatment of asthma in the adult population

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a complex process that results from airway inflammation and manifests as bronchoconstriction. Infiltration of the airway mucosa and lumen by activated inflammatory cells, along with release of mediators, can occur extensively. Chemical mediators known as leukotrienes are believed to play a major role in this process. At present, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the pharmacologic cornerstone of asthma management. However, asthma control may remain suboptimal when relying on ICS because of problems with compliance, poor inhaler technique and concerns about the side effects of steroids; additional agents are often required to control symptoms. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), namely montelukast, provide a safe and effective additional anti-inflammatory treatment option. There is particular benefit for patients with asthma and concomitant allergic rhinitis.

AREAS COVERED

Montelukast has been well studied through rigorous clinical trials. A thorough review of the literature has been undertaken to assess the evidence supporting the use of LTRAs. This review focuses on the role of montelukast not only as monotherapy but also as add-on therapy to ICS in the adult asthma population, as well as adult asthmatics with concomitant allergic rhinitis. In addition, there is often some discrepancy between the evidence generated in the idealized asthma patients recruited into randomized clinical trials and results obtained in the real-life setting. This review assesses recent clinical trials evaluating the real-life evaluation of montelukast, achieved mainly through open-label observational studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Oral LTRA bring remarkable ease of anti-inflammatory treatment administration and symptom improvement with minimal side effects to the management of adult asthma. Basic asthma mechanisms and much-valued scientific groundwork has been identified by exploring target asthma treatment with anti-leukotriene therapy. This will have a significant impact in the future development of targeted asthma therapies as well as the current management of asthma and other inflammatory medical conditions.

Montelukast in childhood asthma: what is the evidence for its use?

Asthma is a complex process involving extensive infiltration of the airway mucosa and lumen by activated inflammatory cells and release of mediators that result in airway inflammation and bronchoconstriction. Leukotrienes are mediators believed to play a major role in this process. At present, inhaled corticosteroids are the cornerstone of asthma management. However, asthma control may remain suboptimal and there is well-documented concern regarding adverse events with the use of inhaled corticosteroids in children. Leukotriene receptor antagonists, such as montelukast, provide a safe and effective treatment option with ease of administration, particularly in preschool children and as add-on therapy in patients with difficult-to-control asthma.

Blocking leukotrienes optimize asthma control: the BLOC survey

Objective:

The aim of this study was to evaluate asthma control after the introduction of a leukotriene modifier (Montelukast), in addition to the current controller asthma therapies, in patients with inadequately controlled mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. Asthma control and patient perception were assessed prior to, and 4 weeks after, the introduction of Montelukast, and the pre-introduction and post-introduction results were compared.

Materials and Methods:

A cross-sectional, observational study collected information on 1,490 eligible adult asthmatic patients in Saudi Arabia. The eligibility criteria included patients aged 15 years or more with symptomatic mild-to-moderate persistent asthma despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids with or without long-acting beta agonist; also, the patient should attend the initial visit and follow-up visits after at least 4 weeks.

Results:

Of the 1,490 eligible patients, 79.5% received inhaled corticosteroids alone, and the remaining 20.5% received combination of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilator. Despite the treatment with daily controller medications, asthma symptoms persisted in more than two-thirds of the study population. Upon adding Montelukast, more than 80% of patients reported improvement in symptoms, which was consistent in all patients irrespective of corticosteroid type or dose (stratum) or the addition of long-acting β2-agonist. At the follow-up visit, 92.2% of patients reported that they felt better on Montelukast.

Conclusion:

Leukotriene modifier Montelukast has significant additive benefits in the management of patients who suffer from mild-to-moderate asthma and who are inadequately controlled on inhaled corticosteroids therapy with or without long-acting bronchodilator.

Add-on montelukast in inadequately controlled asthma patients in a 6-month open-label study: the MONtelukast In Chronic Asthma (MONICA) study

Bronchial asthma often remains uncontrolled despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), long-acting beta(2)-agonists (LABA) or both, necessitating additional treatment. Patients >or=18 years (n=1681) with mild-to-moderate asthma received oral montelukast 10mg added to ICS or ICS+LABAs, and were followed for 6 months in a prospective, open-label observational study. The primary endpoint was change in Asthma Control Test (ACT) score. Secondary endpoints included mini-Asthma Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ) and FEV(1)/PEF. Mean ACT scores improved from 14.6+/-4.6 (baseline) to 19.4+/-4.4 (month 6; p<0.0001). Using ACT score categories, the percentage of patients with uncontrolled (57.5%) or poorly controlled (25.0%) asthma at baseline decreased at month 6 (17.6 and 21.7%, respectively); the percentage of patients with well controlled (13.9%) or completely controlled (1.2%) asthma at baseline increased at month 6 (47.5 and 11.4%, respectively). The mini-AQLQ score (mean+/-SD) improved from 4.0+/-1.1 to 5.3+/-1.1 (p<0.0001); FEV(1) increased from 2.46+/-0.89 to 2.60+/-0.92L (p<0.0001). Treatment with montelukast was generally well tolerated. In patients insufficiently controlled with ICS or ICS+LABAs, daily add-on montelukast improved both asthma control and asthma-related quality of life. Clinicaltrials.gov registry number NCT00802789.

Efficacy of add-on montelukast in patients with non-controlled asthma: a Belgian open-label study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of add-on montelukast on asthma control and allergic rhinitis symptoms in asthmatic patients still symptomatic with chronic treatment with inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta(2) agonist (ICS/LABA), irrespective of the dose.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This 2-month, open-label, real-life, multicentre, observational study was undertaken by 499 general practitioners in Belgium. Patients (>or= 4 years old) with uncontrolled asthma despite fluticasone/salmeterol or budesonide/formoterol therapy had oral montelukast 4, 5, or 10 mg daily added to their therapy, depending on the registered dose for their age. Asthma control, assessed by the 6-item Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) was recorded at baseline and after 2 months of treatment with montelukast and the patients' global evaluation of asthma was also recorded at the end of the study. Concomitant allergic rhinitis symptoms were evaluated according to the patients' perception.

RESULTS

A total of 5769 patients were eligible for analysis. Addition of montelukast was associated with significant decrease in mean (SD) ACQ score (from 1.97 [0.77] at baseline to 1.05 [0.69] after add-on treatment, p < 0.001). There was also a significant improvement in all individual symptoms of the ACQ score (p < 0.001). After 2 months, 89% of the patients reported global improvement of their asthma, with a good correlation between patients' global evaluation and change in ACQ scores. Of the 2442 patients who reported allergic rhinitis symptoms at baseline, 91% showed a global improvement of their asthma symptoms and 82% in their rhinitis symptoms after adding montelukast.

CONCLUSION

This open-label observational study showed an improvement, after 2 months of add-on therapy with montelukast, in both asthma and allergic rhinitis symptoms in patients not adequately controlled on a fixed association of ICS/LABA.

The expanding role of leukotriene receptor antagonists in chronic asthma

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive review of studies that evaluate the effects of leukotriene receptor antagonists in adult chronic asthma.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search using MEDLINE, Clinical Evidence, and the Cochrane Library was performed using the following keywords: randomized controlled trial, asthma, cysteinyl leukotriene, leukotriene receptor antagonist, antileukotriene, montelukast, zafirlukast, pranlukast, inflammation, lung function, exacerbations, and symptoms.

STUDY SELECTION

Relevant peer-reviewed articles (mostly randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and reviews) published up to July 2006 were selected and extracted.

RESULTS

Leukotriene receptor antagonists are beneficial across a range of asthma severities and may have a particular role in exercise-induced asthma, aspirin-sensitive asthma, and individuals with concomitant allergic rhinitis.

CONCLUSION

In the management of chronic asthma, leukotriene receptor antagonists have emerged as a useful oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory adjunct both as monotherapy and in combination with other classes of drugs. Monitoring their effects in terms of lung function alone may result in clinicians missing beneficial effects on inflammatory biomarkers, airway hyperresponsiveness, and exacerbations.

Treatment with 400 microg of inhaled budesonide vs 200 microg of inhaled budesonide and oral montelukast in children with moderate persistent asthma: randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Montelukast is reported to be beneficial in asthma as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids and may reduce the need for the latter.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether a combination of oral montelukast and 200 microg of inhaled budesonide has comparable efficacy to 400 microg of inhaled budesonide alone in children with moderate persistent asthma.

METHODS

In this prospective, blinded, hospital-based randomized controlled trial, 71 children with moderate persistent asthma were randomized to receive either montelukast, 5-mg chewable tablet, with 200 microg of inhaled budesonide or only 400 microg of inhaled budesonide daily for 12 weeks. Baseline and serial measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 second, peak expiratory flow rate, and Asthma Symptom Score were performed; the frequency and severity of exacerbations were also recorded.

RESULTS

Measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 second, peak expiratory flow rate, and Asthma Symptom Score showed no significant differences between the 2 groups at baseline, during the serial follow-up visits, and at the end of the study. However, children who received montelukast had a greater frequency of exacerbations vs those who did not (33.3% vs 9.1%; P < .01).

CONCLUSION

The overall control of asthma with 5 mg of oral montelukast and 200 microg of inhaled budesonide is inferior to that with 400 microg of inhaled budesonide in children with moderate persistent asthma.