The relative dosing of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa in chronic kidney disease

Association of the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent resistance index and the geriatric nutritional risk index with cardiovascular mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients

OBJECTIVE

Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) may be associated with protein-energy wasting. We investigated the relationship of the ESA resistance index (ERI) and the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) for cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients.

METHODS

A total of 180 maintenance HD patients were enrolled. The patients were stratified by the GNRI of 91.2, a previously reported cut-off value, and the ERI of 13.7 (IU/week/kg/g/dL), a cut-off value for predicting cardiovascular-specific mortality, and they were classified into four groups (group 1[G1]: higher GNRI and lower ERI, G2: higher GNRI and higher ERI, G3: lower GNRI and lower ERI, G4: lower GNRI and higher ERI).

RESULTS

The ERI was independently associated with the GNRI (β = -0.271, p = 0.0005). During a median follow-up of 4.6 years, higher ERI and lower GNRI were independently associated with cardiovascular mortality, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-7.34, and aHR, 6.64; 95%CI, 2.60-16.93, respectively). The 7-year survival rates were 96.1%, 70.3%, 77.3%, and 50.1% in G1, G2, G3, and G4, respectively. The aHR values for G4 versus G1 were 12.63 (95%CI, 3.58-44.59). With regards to model discrimination, adding the GNRI alone, the ERI alone, and both to the traditional risk model significantly improved the net reclassification improvement by 0.421, 0.662, and 0.671, respectively. Similar results were obtained for all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

The ERI was independently associated with the GNRI, and could predict cardiovascular mortality in HD patients. Moreover, the combination of GNRI and ERI could improve the predictability for cardiovascular mortality.

Direct healthcare costs of chronic kidney disease management in Italy: What cost-savings can be achieved with higher biosimilar uptake and more appropriate use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents?

PURPOSE

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), are used for treating chronic kidney disease (CKD)-related anemia, contributing to CKD costs. The study was aimed at investigating direct healthcare costs of CKD patients treated with ESAs and the potential savings achievable by increasing the use of biosimilars and preventing inappropriate ESA use.

METHODS

A multi-center, cohort study was conducted using claims databases of five large Italian geographic areas. Yearly mean direct healthcare costs per patient were estimated, stratifying by CKD stage. The total yearly cost and potential savings related to ESA use were estimated: (a) considering 25/50/75% of originator ESA substitution with biosimilars; (b) eliminating inappropriate ESA dispensing.

RESULTS

During the study period, the ESA-related yearly mean cost represented 17% of total yearly costs in stage I-III, decreasing to 13% in stage IV-V and 6% in dialysis. Among originator users, assuming a 25% of biosimilar uptake, the annual cost-savings of ESA treatment would represent 10.5% of total ESA costs in CKD stage I-V and 7.7% in dialysis. Among incident ESA users for which hemoglobin levels were available, 9% started inappropriately ESA treatment, increasing to 62.0% during the first year of maintenance therapy. Hypothesizing prevention of the first inappropriate ESA dispensing, the total yearly cost-savings would amount to €35 772, increasing to €167 641 eliminating the inappropriate dispensing during maintenance therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher use of lowest cost ESA, prevention of inappropriate ESA use as well as other strategies aimed at slowing down the progressive renal impairment are essential for minimizing clinical and economic burden of CKD.

Model-based approach for methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta drug development in paediatric patients with anaemia of chronic kidney disease

AIMS

Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, C.E.R.A.) is used for the treatment of anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients treated with shorter-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agents up to three times weekly can be switched to once-monthly C.E.R.A.. Doses can be adjusted on a monthly basis based on haemoglobin (Hb) levels during the preceding period. A model-based approach was applied to optimise C.E.R.A. development, more specifically the confirmatory trial of the paediatric plan.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data from a phase II paediatric study and phase II and III adult studies were analysed together using modelling and simulation to determine the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of C.E.R.A. in a broad population. Model-based simulations of C.E.R.A. treatment outcomes in paediatric patients were performed, notably when administered subcutaneously and compared to clinical and real-world data.

RESULTS

Age and body weight explained differences in pharmacokinetics, while the pharmacodynamic characteristics of C.E.R.A. were similar between adult and paediatric populations. Simulated Hb levels (mean and 95% prediction interval 10.9 [10.6, 11.2] g dL^-1 ) and C.E.R.A. doses (median and 95% prediction interval 105 [72, 159] μg) 20 weeks after switching to subcutaneous C.E.R.A. were confirmed by observed real-world data from International Pediatric Dialysis Network registries (mean Hb was 10.8 g dL^-1 and median C.E.R.A. dose was 100 μg).

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses have facilitated optimisation of the C.E.R.A. development programme in paediatric patients with anaemia of CKD to provide this patient population with faster access to the drug while avoiding unnecessary clinical trial exposure and related monitoring burden in children.

A quick scoping review of efficacy, safety, economic, and health-related quality-of-life outcomes of short- and long-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia and chronic kidney disease anemia

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are man-made forms of erythropoietin used in the treatment of anemia. This quick-scoping review of systematic literature reviews (SLRs) was conducted to define the clinical, economic, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes for short-acting and long-acting ESAs in patients with chronic kidney disease-induced anemia (CKD-IA) and patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from their establishment until October 2017. SLRs related to the use of short-acting and long-acting ESAs in the treatment of CIA and CKD-IA were included. Forty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The evidence suggests little difference in efficacy, HRQoL, and safety outcomes among ESA types. Cost-effectiveness and market price are likely to become determining factors driving the choice of agent. Comparative studies and costing models accounting for the utilization of biosimilars are needed to establish which ESAs are more cost-effective.

Butyrylcholinesterase level as an independent factor of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent resistance in patients on maintenance hemodialysis: a single-center cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) responsiveness is related to the nutritional status of patients on hemodialysis (HD). Serum butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), an alpha-glycoprotein, may decrease in case of malnutrition. We investigated whether BChE was independently related to ESA resistance in patients on HD.

METHODS

The laboratory data and ESA resistance index (ERI), defined as ESA dosage per week divided by dry weight and hemoglobin, were investigated in 215 patients on HD between July and September 2017. Malnutrition was defined as Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) of < 91.2. The patients were stratified into two groups: ERI-high (ERI ≥ 9.44) and ERI-low (ERI < 9.44) groups. Variables such as patient's background, medication, and laboratory data were compared between the two groups. The optimal cutoff value of BChE for higher ERI was determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Factors independently associated with higher ERI were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The median and optimal cutoff values of ERI and BChE were 6.51 and 200 IU/L, respectively. The study included 71 (33%) and 144 (67%) patients in the ERI-high and ERI-low groups, respectively. Significant between-group differences were observed concerning age, hemoglobin, ESA dose, lipid profiles, serum albumin, body mass index, GNRI, iron metabolism markers, ferric medicines, and BChE. Multivariate analysis showed that BChE < 200 IU/L (odds ratio 3.67; 95% confidence interval 1.73-7.77) continued to be an independent factor associated with higher ERI after adjusting for potential confounders, which was a similar odds ratio as GNRI < 91.2.

CONCLUSION

BChE may be an independent indicator of ESA resistance.

Comparison between short- and long-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in hemodialysis patients: target hemoglobin, variability, and outcome

Purpose

Maintaining target hemoglobin (Hb) with minimal variability is a challenge in hemodialysis (HD) patients. The aim of this study is to compare the long- and short-acting erythropoietin-stimulating agents such as Aranesp and Eprex in achieving these targets.

Methods

Randomized, prospective, open-labeled study of 24 weeks includes stable patients on HD >3 months, age >18 years, and on Eprex for >3 months. Patients were randomized into two groups: A-(Aranesp group):HD patients on Eprex Q TIW or BIW were converted to Aranesp Q weekly, by using the conversion factor of 200:1 and those on Eprex Q weekly to Aranesp Q 2 weeks; B-(Eprex group):patients continued on Eprex treatment. Hemoglobin target was set at (105–125 g/l). Primary end points were percentage of patients achieving target Hb, hemoglobin variability, and number of dose changes in each group.

Results

This study consisted of 139 HD patients: 72 in the Aranesp and 67 in the Eprex—mean (SD) age 54 (16.2) years, 77 (55 %) males. About 46 % were diabetic. Target Hb achieved in 64.8 % of the Aranesp and 59.7 % in the Eprex (p = 0.006). Hb variability was less frequent in the Aranesp group (p = 0.2). Mean number of dose changes was 1.3 (0.87) in the Aranesp and 1.9 (1.2) in the Eprex (p < 0.001). There was 1 vascular access thrombosis in the Aranesp and 8 in the Eprex (p < 0.001). There was no difference in hospitalization and death number between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

Aranesp Q weekly or every 2 weeks is more efficient in achieving target Hb, with less dose changes and minor vascular access complications.

Anemia management with darbepoetin-alfa in outpatient hemodialysis patients switched from epoetin-alfa: a community hospital experience

Epoetin-alfa (EA) and darbepoetin-alfa (DA) are agents for treating anemia in dialysis patients. In September 2005, our free-standing outpatient hemodialysis center (community-hospital based) implemented an interchange from EA to DA. Since then, all hemodialysis patients receive DA as the preferred agent. We performed this observational study to compare effectiveness of DA with EA in anemia management in a cohort of hemodialysis outpatients. We studied 98 hemodialysis outpatients who received twice to thrice weekly EA from January to August 2005. These patients were switched to DA in September 2005, and baseline DA dose was calculated from the conversion table in the package insert. After a 4 month titration phase, the same cohort of patients, now on once weekly DA, was followed from January to September 2006. Dose of EA or DA was adjusted to maintain hemoglobin at 11 to 13 g/dL. Hematologic and dialysis parameters were collected on a monthly basis, and inpatient data were excluded. Mean ± standard deviation age was 65.8 ± 14.2 years, with 42 (42.9%) women. Mean ± standard deviation hemoglobin level was 12.5 ± 1.6 g/dL during EA and 12.5 ± 1.6 g/dL during DA therapy (P = 0.23). Proportion of patients achieving hemoglobin (11-13 g/dL) was 44.5% ± 28.9% with EA and 49.8% ± 25.8% with DA (P = 0.09). Average intrapatient absolute hemoglobin variability was 1.0 ± 0.5 g/dL on EA and 1.1 ± 0.5 g/dL on DA (P = 0.29). Median (and interquartile range) EA dose used was 11,400 (7,050-22,800) IU/week, and median DA dose was 59.8 (40-91.6) mcg/week with an EA:DA dose conversion ratio of 191:1. Patients on EA or DA had similar dialysis adequacy, albumin, and iron parameters. DA is as effective as EA in treating anemia in hemodialysis outpatients. Dose requirement of DA is greater than 200:1 of the amount of EA and may not translate into cost savings.

Estimate of maintenance EPO to darbepoetin alfa dose conversion ratio in a hospital-based dialysis patient population

BACKGROUND

Epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa are erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) used to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. EPO and darbepoetin alfa have a non-proportional dose conversion relationship across the dosing spectrum. However, reports comparing the dose relationship between the two ESAs do not adjust for the non-proportional dose relationship or for population differences. Because drug cost is directly related to dosage, appropriate methods to assess the dose relationship between the two ESAs are important to understand the economic implications of converting patient populations from one ESA treatment to another.

OBJECTIVE

To describe dose conversion methods that take into account the non-proportional dose relationship between EPO and darbepoetin alfa, and calculate the dose conversion ratio (DCR) between the two ESAs in a hospital-based dialysis patient population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study where longitudinal data from medical charts were collected for chronic hemodialysis patients being treated at hospital-based dialysis centers. Mean maintenance DCRs were calculated at the population level for hemodialysis patients converted from EPO to darbepoetin alfa treatment and subsequently maintained on darbepoetin alfa. Two methods were used to determine the DCRs: a regression-based method using ordinary least squares regression, and ratio-based method using an arithmetic mean.

RESULTS

The estimated population mean maintenance DCR for the population in this analysis was 320:1 (Units EPO:µg darbepoetin alfa) using the regression-based method, and 350:1 using the ratio-based method. Sensitivity analysis yielded DCRs ranging from 311 to 333:1.

CONCLUSIONS

The two methods in estimating the DCR presented here provide payers with an empirical way of comparing ESA utilization for pharmacoeconomic evaluation. DCR results may vary according to patient characteristics; however, mean DCRs of greater than 300:1 were obtained in this analysis. Exclusion of other patient-related factors that may influence ESA dose is a possible limitation of the study.

Increased coated-platelet levels in chronic haemodialysis patients

AIM

To determine if levels of coated-platelets, which are potentially pro-thrombotic, are increased in end-stage renal disease patients on haemodialysis, a condition associated with high cardiovascular disease risk.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional observational study, coated-platelet levels were measured by flow cytometry in 25 end-stage renal failure haemodialysis patients and 25 controls without renal disease. Associations between coated-platelet levels and clinical and biochemical factors relevant to renal and cardiovascular disease were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean +/- SD coated-platelet levels were higher in the dialysis group than in the control group (39.3+/-14.3% vs 30.9+/-10.3%, P=0.02). The number of subjects with high coated-platelet levels (>40%) was larger in the dialysis than in the control group (13/25 vs 4/25, chi(2) test, P=0.007). On univariate analysis, coated-platelet levels correlated with serum C-reactive protein levels in renal failure (r=0.47, P=0.02) and inversely with white cell count in the control group (r= -0.60, P=0.001). Coated-platelet levels were higher in dialysis patients reporting alcohol abstinence than among those reporting 'social' drinking (44.3+/-12.6 vs 28.8+/-13.5%, P=0.01). Age, gender, body weight, smoking, diabetes, lipid levels and lipid-lowering drugs were not associated with coated-platelet levels (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Coated-platelet levels are increased in haemodialysis patients relative to subjects with normal renal function, and are related to inflammation and alcohol abstinence. Other vascular risk factors, such as smoking, lipids and diabetes, were not related to coated-platelet levels. Coated-platelets may be implicated in the increased thrombosis and vascular risk in end-stage renal disease.