Clinical experience and management considerations with long-acting risperidone

Barriers to the Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics in the Management of Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia and related disorders remain major disabling conditions, mainly due to antipsychotic treatment resistance and to relapses related to antipsychotic nonadherence. Treatment nonadherence rates are consistently high in long-term patients, but also in first-episode patients with schizophrenia. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIAs) were mainly developed to improve adherence to treatment and to reduce the rate of relapse and rehospitalization in schizophrenia due to treatment discontinuation. There is favorable clinical evidence, in terms of both efficacy and treatment adherence, that could support higher LAIA prescription rates, especially in patients in early phases of psychotic disorders. Several factors could be hindering wider use of LAIAs, mainly associated with perceptions and attitudes of patients, clinicians, and health managers or policy makers. The main aims of this review are (i) to summarize the existing data on the efficacy and tolerability of LAIAs compared with oral formulations in the management of schizophrenia and related disorders, focusing on the novel, second-generation LAIA options; (ii) to analyze the barriers that exist to the more widespread use of these formulations; and (iii) to discuss possible approaches to overcoming these barriers.

Risperidone long-acting injection in the treatment of schizophrenia spectrum illnesses: A retrospective chart review of 19 patients in the Vancouver Community Mental Health Organization (Vancouver, Canada)

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is a chronic debilitating disease that affects ~110,000 Canadians (0.55% lifetime prevalence). Risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) is the first injectable, long-acting, atypical antipsychotic drug marketed in Canada.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness and hospitalization rates of patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophreniform disorder treated with RLAI in a community mental health care setting.

METHODS

Data were collected between August 1, 2006 and September 30, 2006 via a retrospective chart review of outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophreniform disorder who received treatment from 1 of the 8 mental health teams within the Vancouver Community Mental Health Organization (VCMHO) in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Collected data included: frequency and duration of institutional care, discharge and relapse rates, demographic variables, diagnosis history, RLAI medication history, and history of other medications. The overall severity of symptoms before and after RLAI treatment and the improvement in symptoms during treatment were evaluated using the Clinical Global Impression Scales for severity (CGI-S)(1 = not ill to 7 = extremely ill) and improvement (CGI-I)(1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse).

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were identified as having received RLAI. The charts of 19 patients (10 men, 9 women; mean [SD] age at time of chart audit, 36.7 [11.7] years; mean [SD] age at primary diagnosis, 23.6 [7.4] years; race: white, 10 [52.6%]; Asian, 6 [31.6%]; American Indian, 1 [5.3%]; black, 1 [5.3%]; other, 1 [5.3%]) were included in the analysis. The majority of patients (78%) had been treated with another antipsychotic drug prior to treatment with RLAI: risperidone (77%), quetiapine (47%), zuclopenthixol (43%), olanzapine (43%), and loxapine (17%). Mean (SD) CGI-S Scale score declined significantly from 5.29 (1.3) before treatment initiation to 3.05 (1.0) posttreatment (P < 0.001). Mean (SD) CGI-I Scale score was 2.58 (0.71) (P < 0.001); 94% of patients had a CGI-I score ≤3. Mean (SD) duration of hospitalization decreased significantly from 15.7 (19.7) days before treatment to 2.4 (6.0) days after treatment (P < 0.05). Mean (SD) number of hospializations also decreased significantly from 2.0 (1.8) before treatment to 0.5 (1.3) after treatment (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this pilot study suggest that use of the atypical-antipsychotic medication RLAI significantly decreased duration and rates of hospitalization, compared with baseline, in these VCMHO patients with schizophrenia spectrum illnesses.

Should long-acting (depot) antipsychotics be used in early schizophrenia? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The relapse rate after a first episode of schizophrenia is high, often due to non-adherence with medication. Long-acting injections of antipsychotics (LAI) are used to promote adherence to medication.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the use of LAIs in first-episode and early schizophrenia.

METHOD

A systematic electronic search of all original data containing peer-reviewed studies published in English using EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane and PsychINFO from the onset of records. Reference lists from retrieved articles were examined for further relevant studies.

RESULTS

Ten studies were identified: two cohort studies; three randomised controlled trials; and five open studies. These studies, although limited, demonstrated the effectiveness of LAI in early schizophrenia. Seven of the 10 studies had risperidone long-acting injection as the only LAI.

CONCLUSION

LAIs may be useful in the treatment of early schizophrenia in terms of symptom control and relapse reduction, particularly if chosen by the patient or when medication adherence is a priority. There is a need for a large-scale, randomised controlled trial comparing oral and LAI antipsychotics to assess long-term outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of long-acting injectable risperidone in daily practice: an open-label, noninterventional, prospective study in schizophrenia and related disorders

This postauthorization safety study evaluated the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI) in routine clinical practice. In this 6-month, multicenter, European, naturalistic study, patients were included if, during routine clinical practice, long-term antipsychotic therapy with RLAI was deemed necessary by the treating physician. Efficacy measures included Clinical Global Impression-Severity and Global Assessment of Functioning. Safety was evaluated by recording treatment-emergent adverse events (AE). RLAI was initiated in 5134 patients (aged 14-94 years); predominantly male (58.6%) with paranoid schizophrenia (69.8%). RLAI initial doses were 25 mg every 2 weeks (37.0% patients), 37.5 mg (18.0%), and 50 mg (44.4%). Treatment was completed by 4314 patients (84.0%). RLAI was discontinued on account of loss to follow-up (n=346; 6.7%), insufficient response (n=116; 2.3%), and AEs (n=106; 2.1%). Clinical Global Impression-Severity significantly improved from baseline to endpoint (P<0.001). Patient functioning on the Global Assessment of Functioning scale also significantly improved from baseline to endpoint (45.4 + or - 16.0 vs. 62.4 + or - 17.7, respectively, P<0.001). Treatment-emergent AEs were recorded by 1018 (20%) of patients. AEs occurring in > or = 5% of patients were akathisia, extrapyramidal disorders, depression, psychotic disorder, anxiety, and weight gain. Serious AEs were reported by 384 (8%) patients. This study confirms good safety, tolerability, and efficacy with RLAI in routine clinical practice.

Cost effectiveness of long-acting risperidone in Sweden

BACKGROUND

In Sweden, risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI) is generally used in a population of schizophrenia patients who are at a high risk of being non-compliant. However, RLAI might also be suitable for use in the general schizophrenia population.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the clinical and economic effects of RLAI in the Swedish treatment practice using a discrete-event simulation (DES) model. Treatment outcomes and direct costs were analysed for both the high-risk non-compliant patient population and the general schizophrenia population.

METHODS

An existing DES model was adapted to simulate the treatment of schizophrenia in Sweden. Model inputs were based on literature research and supplemented with expert opinion. In the high-risk non-compliant schizophrenia population, RLAI was compared with haloperidol LAI. The analysis was built upon differences in symptom reduction, time between relapses, compliance and adverse effect profile between the two drugs. Main outcomes were the predicted incremental (discounted) costs (€) and effects (QALYs). In the general schizophrenia population, RLAI was compared with oral olanzapine. This analysis was built upon differences in compliance and adverse effects between the drugs. Multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were carried out to assess the sensitivity of the results of the two analyses.

RESULTS

In the high-risk non-compliant patient population, RLAI was predicted to generate 0.103 QALYs per patient over 3 years while realizing cost savings of €5013 (year 2007 values) compared with haloperidol LAI. The main driver of the cost effectiveness of RLAI was the difference in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) reduction between the two drugs, followed by the difference in adverse effects. The PSA showed that, in this setting, RLAI had a probability of 100% of being cost effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €43,300 per QALY gained, compared with haloperidol LAI. The probability that RLAI combines additional effectiveness with cost savings compared with haloperidol LAI was estimated at 94%. When analysing RLAI in the general schizophrenia population, it was predicted to generate 0.043 QALYs and save €239 per patient over 5 years compared with olanzapine. Compliance was the main driver of the cost effectiveness of RLAI in this scenario. In the PSA it was shown that RLAI had a probability of 78% of being cost effective at a WTP threshold of €43,300 per QALY gained, compared with olanzapine. The estimated probability that RLAI combines additional effectiveness with cost savings was 50% and the probability that RLAI is less effective and more costly than olanzapine was negligible (0.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with RLAI is suggested to result in improved QALYs combined with cost savings compared with haloperidol LAI among the Swedish, high-risk non-compliant schizophrenia patient population. In the general schizophrenia population, RLAI also resulted in positive incremental QALYs and cost savings, when compared with olanzapine. However, the estimates used in the model for compliance and symptom reduction need further validation through naturalistic-based studies with reasonable follow-up to more definitely establish the real-life differences between RLAI and the comparators in the considered patient populations and to further reduce the uncertainty of these parameters.

Dosing patterns in Europe: Efficacy and safety of risperidone long-acting injectable in doses of 25, 37.5 and 50 mg

Objective. To assess the dose prescription patterns for risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI) in patients with schizophrenia who participated in the 6-month, open-label Switch to Risperidone Microspheres (StoRMi) trial. Methods. Clinically stable patients requiring a change in medication were converted to RLAI prescribed using clinically-appropriate doses, as determined by treating clinicians. RLAI 25 mg was recommended as the starting dose, although higher initiation doses were permitted if deemed necessary. RLAI was administered intramuscularly every 2 weeks, with dosage adjustments permitted, and continued for a total of 6 months. Efficacy outcomes included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S). Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were monitored. Results. A total of 1,849 patients were included. Modal dose was 25 mg for 52.9% of patients. At baseline, patients treated with lower RLAI doses were more likely to be female, have shorter disease duration, milder symptoms, and be using less polypharmacy. The strongest predictors that a patient would remain on 25 mg RLAI were baseline PANSS hallucinatory behaviour item score (odds ratio [OR]=0.78), baseline CGI-S score (OR=0.69), female gender (OR=1.56), and country of residence (P<0.001 for all). Efficacy measures improved in all dose groups, with the greatest improvement seen in patients treated with lower doses. AEs were more common in patients treated with 50 mg RLAI (68 vs. 57% with lower doses; P<0.0001), although most AEs were mild to moderate in severity. Conclusion. In this study, 25 mg RLAI was the most commonly prescribed dose. RLAI was effective and well tolerated over the full range of doses.

Long-acting injectable risperidone in the treatment of subjects with recent-onset psychosis: a preliminary study

Using a long-acting antipsychotic to improve adherence early in the illness may reduce relapse rates and promote sustained remission, thereby improving the long-term outcome of schizophrenia. We assessed whether risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) could be used safely and effectively in the treatment of recent-onset psychosis. Fifty patients aged 15 to 43 years with newly diagnosed schizophreniform disorder or schizophrenia were treated with RLAI 25 to 50 mg every 2 weeks for 2 years. Thirty-six patients (72%) completed the trial. Of 39 (78%) who showed a clinical response of 50%, 4 relapsed. Thirty-two patients (64%) achieved remission. Mean maximum increase in Extrapyramidal Symptoms Rating Scale total score was 1.4 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-2.10; n = 50); 10 patients required anticholinergic medication, and 1 subject developed persistent dyskinesia. Prolactin levels were elevated in 18 patients, 4 of whom reported possible prolactin-related adverse events. Mean increase in body mass index to last visit for all patients was 4.8 kg/m (SD, 3.8 kg/m). The final RLAI dose was 25 mg for 54% of patients, 37.5 mg for 30%, and 50 mg for 16%. This preliminary study suggests that RLAI was overall well tolerated and appears to be effective in recent-onset psychosis. Further investigation is warranted.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of switching antipsychotic medication to long-acting injectable risperidone in patients with schizophrenia : a 12- and 24-month follow-up from the e-STAR database in Spain

BACKGROUND

The availability of long-acting injectable risperidone may increase adherence to antipsychotic treatment and lead to improved clinical and economic outcomes for patients with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the cost effectiveness of treatment with long-acting injectable risperidone compared with previous antipsychotic regimens in patients with schizophrenia enrolled in the electronic Schizophrenia Treatment Adherence Registry (e-STAR) in Spain.

METHODS

e-STAR is an international, long-term, ongoing, observational study of schizophrenia patients who, during their routine course of clinical practice, are started on a new antipsychotic treatment. In e-STAR, data are collected at baseline, retrospectively over a minimum period of 12 months and up to a maximum of 24 months, and prospectively at 3-month intervals for 24 months after the start of a new antipsychotic drug. For the purpose of this study, patients who started treatment with long-acting injectable risperidone during their routine clinical management and were enrolled in the e-STAR study in Spain were eligible. The effectiveness of long-acting injectable risperidone compared with previous antipsychotic treatment, defined as the absence of hospitalizations or relapses, was assessed at 12 and 24 months of treatment. Acquisition costs of antipsychotic drug therapy were based on the official registered price. Drug prices from source were in euro, year 2005 values; hospital costs from source were in euro, year 2001 values, and were inflated to reflect 2005 costs. Complete follow-up data were available for 788 patients at 12 months after starting long-acting injectable risperidone and for 757 patients at 24 months.

RESULTS

In terms of effectiveness, at 12 months after switching to long-acting injectable risperidone, there was a higher percentage of patients who did not require hospitalization (89.1%), did not relapse (85.4%) or neither required hospitalization nor relapsed (82.4%) as compared retrospectively with the same period for the previous treatment (67%, 47.8% and 59.8%, respectively). The corresponding figures at 24 months also favoured treatment with long-acting injectable risperidone (85.2% vs 60%, 88.5% vs 47.4% and 77% vs 53.6%, respectively). Treatment with long-acting injectable risperidone was associated with higher medication costs per month compared with previous antipsychotic medication after 12 (euro 405.80 vs euro 128.16) and 24 months (euro 407.33 vs euro 142.77) of follow-up. Cost effectiveness per month per patient was lower for risperidone than previous antipsychotic medication in the three patient scenarios: without hospitalization (euro 539.82 vs euro 982.13), without relapse (euro 519.67 vs euro 1242.03) and without hospitalization and without relapse (euro 597.22 vs euro 1059.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with long-acting injectable risperidone compared with previous antipsychotic medications resulted in a higher number of patients not requiring hospitalization, not relapsing, and not requiring hospitalization and not showing relapse, resulting in risperidone being more cost effective per month per patient.It is important to note that real-world variations in adherence would automatically be controlled from within a randomized control trial, and hence, any evaluation of variations in adherence inevitably requires a real-world focus. On the basis of these findings, which were obtained in real-world clinical practice, long-acting injectable risperidone is predicted to be the dominant strategy because it results in effective symptom control and direct medical cost savings. However, because of limitations in methodology, any conclusions should, at this stage, be treated as tentative, and confirmation in more detailed follow-up studies is required. Cost-effectiveness comparisons based on experimental evaluations of relapse minimization strategies are also required. In order to avoid estimation biases in the future, a prospectively designed study is needed.

Long-acting formulations of atypical antipsychotics: time to reconsider when to introduce depot antipsychotics

The current availability of a long-acting injectable formulation of risperidone and the potential future availability of long-acting formulations of other atypical antipsychotics (such as paliperidone) should prompt a reconsideration of at what stage in the treatment of schizophrenia such long-acting agents should be introduced. At present, long-acting formulations, particularly of conventional antipsychotics (depots), are usually reserved for patients with chronic schizophrenia who are at high-risk of noncompliance. Recent and increasing data from other patient groups, such as those with first-episode psychosis, suggest that long-acting risperidone is associated with good efficacy and tolerability leading to high patient acceptance, and treatment continuation rates that are greater than with oral antipsychotics. The benefits of an atypical antipsychotic coupled with the assurance of medication delivery in the form of a long-acting injection imply that these novel formulations should be considered in first-episode patients, for whom optimal outcome is frequently compromised by early treatment discontinuation and poor adherence.

Long-acting risperidone: Focus on safety

BACKGROUND

Although atypical antipsychotics are generally regarded as having more favorable tolerability profiles than conventional antipsychotics, differences between specific atypical agents can be important when individualizing treatment. Long-acting risperidone (LAR), the first long-acting injectable atypical anti-psychotic, has been found to be effective in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.

OBJECTIVES

This review summarizes clinical evidence for the tolerability profile of LAR in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder and assesses its utility in specific patient groups, including younger patients and the elderly.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies published between January 1994 and March 2006 that evaluated the tolerability of LAR. The primary search terms were long-acting risperidone, schizophrenia, schizoaffective, long term, tolerability, and safety. Abstracts and posters presented at major psychiatry and schizophrenia conferences during this period also were reviewed. Articles were included if they were reports of clinical studies and included tolerability data for LAR.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 7 open-label trials, 3 double-blind trials, 15 subanalyses, and 1 pooled analysis. When patients were switched directly or indirectly from another antipsychotic agent, LAR was generally well tolerated, with a low incidence of withdrawals due to adverse events (1%-16%). Moreover, LAR was associated with a weight-gain profile of 1 to 2 kg in the short term and did not appear to negatively affect lipids or glucose metabolism. Although LAR was associated with elevations in serum prolactin levels in 2% to 7% of patients, these elevations were not symptomatic, and levels decreased over time.

CONCLUSIONS

LAR was generally well tolerated in several patient groups, including the elderly and those with schizoaffective disorder. When patients were switched from other antipsychotics, use of LAR was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events compared with placebo.