Long-term effectiveness and tolerability of sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain

Rapid-Onset Opioids for Management of Breakthrough Cancer Pain: Considerations for Daily Practice

Background and Objective

Rapid-onset opioids (ROOs) are effective treatments for breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) given their rapid onset of action and relatively short duration of analgesia. The aim of this article is to describe specific considerations for the use of ROOs in daily practice, focusing on dose titration and treatment of specific populations.

Type of Review

We conducted a narrative review on the use of ROOs for BTcP. We selected papers according to the following search terms: “breakthrough cancer pain” and “rapid onset opioids”.

Results

ROOs may be considered as the most suitable drugs to treat BTcP and can be used “on-demand”. Several fentanyl formulations are available and have been associated with control of BTcP and with improvement in quality of life. Various titration schemes have been used to optimize ROO dosing; however, a dose-proportional scheme could be considered safe and effective in most patients. Specific formulations may be more suitable for specific patient subgroups; for example, patients with oral mucositis may prefer intranasal to oral formulations. Moreover, elderly patients or those without caregivers should be clearly educated on the use of these formulations. A key element in achieving successful treatment of BTcP is awareness of the barriers to pain management, including poor overall assessment, patient reluctance to take opioids or report pain, and physician reluctance to prescribe opioids.

Conclusion

A personalized approach is fundamental when prescribing a medication for BTcP, and careful attention should be given to drug choice and route of administration, and to the need for alternative therapeutic options.

Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Fentanyl Tablets in Breakthrough Cancer Pain Management According to Cancer Stage and Background Opioid Medication

Objective

Our objective was to assess the effect of sublingual fentanyl tablets (SFTs) on pain relief, quality of life, and adverse effects in patients with cancer pain, according to cancer stage and background opioid regimen.

Methods

Subgroup analyses from a recently completed study were performed according to cancer stage (locally advanced cancer [LAC] vs. metastatic cancer) and most frequent background opioid medication (fentanyl vs. oxycodone/naloxone). The efficacy and safety of SFTs were evaluated, recording pain intensity (PI), onset of pain relief, and adverse events (AEs). Health status was assessed with the Short Form 12, version 2 (SF-12v2) questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (anxiety subscale [HADS-A] and depression subscale [HADS-D]).

Results

In total, 54 (67.5%) patients had LAC and 26 (32.5%) had metastatic cancer. The oxycodone/naloxone group included 39 patients (48.1%) and the fentanyl group 29 (35.8%). In all subgroups, pain relief was achieved within 5 min in an increasing number of individuals over time; at the end of the study, PI values decreased (PI-end: 44.4% for LAC vs. 57.9% for metastatic cancer; 44.4% for fentanyl vs. 38.6% for oxycodone/naloxone). HADS and mental component summary (MCS) SF-12v2 scores significantly improved in the LAC group (HADS-A 9.44–8.04; HADS-D 10.46–8.15; MCS 44.69–45.94) and in the fentanyl group (HADS-A 10.05–8.33; HADS-D 11.95–8.76; MCS 44.38–47.19). AEs were reported in few patients and were mostly mild.

Conclusions

Exploratory subgroup analyses show the efficacy and safety of SFTs for the treatment of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer, regardless of their cancer stage and background opioid medication.

[Fentanyl buccal tablets in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain. German cohort of a pan-European multicentre study]

BACKGROUND

Patients with breakthrough cancer pain (BtCP) experience significant limitations in their physical, mental and social functions. Fentanyl buccal tablets (FBT), a rapid onset opioid, are specifically indicated for the treatment of BtCP.

METHOD

The results of the German cohort of a pan-European study are presented. This included cancer pain patients from 32 German centers. Patients were on continuous opioid medication and had at least 4 BtCP episodes per day. After randomization to 2 groups, 66 patients started the titration of FBT with 100 μg (group A) and 200 μg (group B), respectively. All patients were titrated to their individual EAD, which could be a maximum of 800 μg FBT per episode, regardless of the initial dose. Subsequently, up to 8 BtCP episodes were treated with this EAD. At baseline and after treatment, patients assessed the effects of BtCP on their functional status using the modified BPI-7S and answered questions about the efficacy, simplicity, and ease-of-use of the treatment.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Successful titration was achieved by 49 patients (74.2%). There was no statistically significant difference between group A and group B. The global score of the modified BPI-7S increased by 8.5 (± 12.8) points (from 34.7 ± 13.6 at the beginning to 26.2 ± 15.8 at the end of treatment), from which a statistically significant improvement in the quality of life of patients can be derived. Global patient contentment improved, most notably the rapid onset of 2.4 points to 3.4 points at the end of the study. 76.9% of patients found taking FBT simple or very simple.

Breakthrough Cancer Pain: A Systematic Review of Pharmacologic Management

BACKGROUND

Breakthrough cancer pain (BtCP), defined as a transient exacerbation of pain that occurs in conjunction with well-controlled background pain, is a common and burdensome problem in patients with cancer.
.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review is to identify evidence-based pharmacologic modalities for adequate management of BtCP. 
.

METHODS

PubMed and CINAHL® databases were searched to identify literature regarding pharmacologic strategies for BtCP published from January 2006 to June 2016. These studies were then synthesized by the Oncology Nursing Society Putting Evidence Into Practice pain team. 
.

FINDINGS

Forty-four studies provide evidence for the use of opioids for the management of BtCP. Transmucosal immediate-release fentanyl (TIRF) was found to have the most evidence for BtCP. Five studies and guidelines also suggest that oral opioids (not including TIRF products) be dosed proportionally to baseline opioids at 10%-20% of the 24-hour, around-the-clock dose.

[Transmucosal fentanyl administration: sublingual, buccal, nasal - all the same? Treatment of breakthrough cancer pain]

BACKGROUND

Transient exacerbation of pain in cancer patients (breakthrough cancer pain, BTCP) despite adequately controlled background pain should be regarded as an independent disease and receive targeted treatment. The opioid of choice is fentanyl, a rapid onset and highly potent WHO category III analgesic. Fentanyl has a strong first pass effect when administered orally and resorbed enterally, however it is well suited for transmucosal administration, e.g. on the oral or nasal mucosa. Seven different preparations of rapid onset fentanyl for transmucosal administration via various administration pathways are currently available in Germany.

SCIENTIFIC PROBLEM AND METHOD

The aim of this review article was to determine which patient can benefit most from which forms of administration. Since there are hardly any direct comparisons of administration forms among each other, meta-analyses and reviews were included in the assessment.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Tablets with an applicator (lozenge), sublingual and buccal tablets, as well as a buccal film are available for the oral transmucosal administration of fentanyl; there is an aqueous fentanyl nasal spray and a pectin-rich nasal spray for nasal transmucosal administration. The individual preparations differ considerably with regard to their pharmacological (e.g. bioavailability, c_max and t_max) and patient-relevant parameters (e.g. onset of action, potency and duration of effect). Fentanyl nasal spray is superior to the other forms of administration in terms of rapid onset of action and clinically relevant pain reduction and can thus be recommended as a treatment option for rapidly evolving and/or spontaneously occurring breakthrough cancer pain.

Comparative Study Between Different Ready-Made Orally Disintegrating Platforms for the Formulation of Sumatriptan Succinate Sublingual Tablets

Sumatriptan succinate (SS) is a selective serotonin receptor agonist used for the treatment of migraine attacks, suffering from extensive first-pass metabolism and low oral bioavailability (∼14%). The aim of this work is to compare the performance of different ready-made co-processed platforms (Pharmaburst®, Prosolv ODT®, Starlac®, Pearlitol Flash®, or Ludiflash®) in the formulation of SS sublingual orodispersible tablets (ODTs) using direct compression technique. The prepared SS ODT formulae were evaluated regarding hardness, friability, simulated wetting time, and in vitro disintegration and dissolution tests. Different mucoadhesive polymers-HPMC K4M, Carbopol®, chitosan, or Polyox®-were tested aiming to increase the residence time in the sublingual area. A pharmacokinetic study on healthy human volunteers was performed, using LC/MS/MS assay, to compare the optimum sublingual formula (Ph25/HPMC) with the conventional oral tablet Imitrex®. Results showed that tablets prepared using Pharmaburst® had significantly (p < 0.05) the lowest simulated wetting and in vitro disintegration times of 17.17 and 23.50 s, respectively, with Q _5 min of 83.62%. HPMC showed a significant (p < 0.05) increase in the residence time from 48.44 to 183.76 s. The relative bioavailability was found to be equal to 132.34% relative to the oral tablet Imitrex®. In conclusion, Pharmaburst® was chosen as the optimum ready-made co-processed platform that can be successfully used in the preparation of SS sublingual tablets for the rapid relief of migraine attacks.

Rapid acting fentanyl formulations in breakthrough pain in cancer. Drug selection by means of the System of Objectified Judgement Analysis

Drug selection of rapid acting fentanyl formulations in the treatment of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer is performed by the System of Objectified Judgement Analysis method. All seven available formulations were included in the analysis. The following selection criteria were used: number of available strengths, variability in the rate of absorption, interactions, clinical efficacy, side effects, ease of administration and documentation. No direct double-blind comparative studies between two or more formulations were identified and the clinical documentation of all formulations is limited. The most distinguishing criterion was ease of use. This led to slightly higher scores for Abstral, Instanyl and PecFent than for the other formulations. The pros and cons of each formulation should be discussed with the patient, and the most suitable formulation selected for each individual patient.

Sublingual Fentanyl Tablets for Relief of Breakthrough Pain in Cancer Patients and Association with Quality-of-Life Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Breakthrough pain (BTP) is highly prevalent in patients with cancer and is strongly associated with adverse outcomes related to health status, mood, anxiety and depression. However, studies on the effect of BTP medication on quality of life (QOL) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to provide a qualitative evaluation of the effect of sublingual fentanyl tablets (SFT), a therapy specifically developed for BTP, on the QOL of cancer pain patients.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, prospective observation post-authorisation, open-label study between March and December 2013. The study consisted of a screening visit and four assessment points at 3, 7, 15 and 30 days. Pain intensity (PI), frequency of BTP, onset of pain relief and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each visit. Anxiety and depression were evaluated using the validated Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and health status using the Short Form 12, version 2 (SF-12v2) Health Survey.

RESULTS

Of the 102 patients considered eligible, 81 (79.4 %) were enrolled; of these, 69 (85.1 %) completed the study. Significant pain reduction was achieved for average PI (p < 0.001) compared with baseline. At the end of the observational period, HADS scores showed significant improvement in the depression subscale (p = 0.005) and the anxiety subscale (p < 0.001). Similarly, SF-12 scores showed significant improvement, both in the mental component score (p < 0.001) and the physical component score (p = 0.002). SFT was well-tolerated and only one patient withdrew from the study due to drug-related AEs.

CONCLUSION

SFT represents an effective, well-tolerated treatment for cancer BTP. Results provide consistent evidence for the positive impact of SFT on health-related QOL and physical functioning as well as other co-morbidities of cancer BTP such as anxiety and depression.

Canadian recommendations for the management of breakthrough cancer pain

Breakthrough cancer pain (btcp) represents an important element in the spectrum of cancer pain management. Because most btcp episodes peak in intensity within a few minutes, speed of medication onset is crucial for proper control. In Canada, several current provincial guidelines for the management of cancer pain include a brief discussion about the treatment of btcp; however, there are no uniform national recommendations for the management of btcp. That lack, accompanied by unequal access to pain medication across the country, contributes to both regional and provincial variability in the management of btcp. Currently, immediate-release oral opioids are the treatment of choice for btcp. This approach might not always offer optimal speed for onset of action and duration to match the rapid nature of an episode of btcp. Novel transmucosal fentanyl formulations might be more appropriate for some types of btcp, but limited access to such drugs hinders their use. In addition, the recognition of btcp and its proper assessment, which are crucial steps toward appropriate treatment selection, remain challenging for many health care professionals. To facilitate appropriate management of btcp, a group of prominent Canadian specialists in palliative care, oncology, and anesthesiology convened to develop a set of recommendations and suggestions to assist Canadian health care providers in the treatment of btcp and the alleviation of the suffering and discomfort experienced by adult cancer patients.

Long-term safety of fentanyl sublingual spray in opioid-tolerant patients with breakthrough cancer pain

PURPOSE

The current study assessed the long-term safety of fentanyl sublingual spray for managing breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP).

METHODS

This open-label, multicenter study enrolled both de novo and rollover patients who completed a double-blind, efficacy trial. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age and experiencing pain that was being managed with an around-the-clock opioid yet were experiencing ≤4 BTCP episodes daily and were opioid-tolerant (i.e., receiving ≥60 mg/day oral morphine or an equivalent dose of another opioid for ≥1 week). De novo patients initially entered a 21-day titration period to identify an effective dose of fentanyl sublingual spray (100-1600 μg), then entered a 90-day maintenance period. The incidence of adverse events (AEs), results of laboratory tests, vital sign assessments, and treatment satisfaction were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 269 patients (de novo, 179; rollover, 90) who entered the maintenance period, 163 (60.6 %) completed the study; the primary reason for discontinuation was an AE (22.3 %). Eighty percent of patients identified an effective dose of fentanyl sublingual spray (median dose, 600 μg). The most common AEs differed from the titration period (nausea (13 %), vomiting (12 %), and somnolence (10 %)) to the maintenance period (malignant neoplasm progression (24 %), vomiting (16 %), and peripheral edema (12 %)). Few changes in laboratory parameters and vital sign assessments were observed. Patients generally reported being more satisfied with fentanyl sublingual spray than with their previous BTCP treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This long-term maintenance study demonstrated that fentanyl sublingual spray was generally safe and well tolerated for managing BTCP over a 90-day period.

Transmucosal Immediate-Release Fentanyl for Breakthrough Cancer Pain: Opportunities and Challenges for Use in Palliative Care

Opioids are used to treat breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP) and can be classified by relative duration and onset of action. Regulatory approvals of numerous transmucosal immediate-release fentanyl (TIRF) formulations provide alternative options to palliative care-trained providers in the management of BTCP. TIRFs have been formulated as a sublingual tablet, sublingual spray, intranasal spray, pectin-based nasal spray, buccal tablet, and buccal soluble film. Differences exist between TIRFs regarding formulation design and dosing to treat BTCP. Opportunities for use include palliation of BTCP in head and neck cancer and/or radiation-induced mucositis. The purpose of this review is to discuss TIRF formulation and dosing, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, patient acceptability, and safety/tolerability. In addition, barriers to TIRF utilization will be discussed.

Efficacy and safety of sublingual fentanyl tablets for the management of breakthrough pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain with neuropathic component: multicenter prospective study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Despite its prevalence and impact, breakthrough pain (BTP) in chronic non-cancer pain with neuropathic component, has not been well studied and is sometimes unrecognized and often undertreated. We evaluated the efficacy of sublingual fentanyl tablet (SLF) for the treatment of BTP in opioid-tolerant patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain with neuropathic component in terms of relief of pain intensity and assessed whether hypothetical pain relief impacts on quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective, open-label study was conducted over a 30-day period. Efficacy was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and time to onset of action of SLF. The incidence of dependence was assessed by the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ). Changes in QoL were evaluated using the Brief Pain Questionnaire (BPI) and the EuroQol (EQ-5D). Adverse events (AE) were recorded throughout.

RESULTS

106 patients were enrolled and 105 completed the study. The average pain reduction across the study was -3.30 points [95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.9-3.7; P < 0.0001]. Pain intensity improvement from baseline was statistically significant at first assessment and all subsequent assessments (P < 0.0001). The most common AEs included nausea (33.87 %), constipation (33.06 %), somnolence (19.35 %) and vomiting (6.45 %). No significant differences were observed on LDQ (P = 0.71). QoL as measured by BPI showed statistically significant improvement in all four severity items and all interference items (P < 0.0001) and a significant improvement in the percentage of pain relief reported by patients (P < 0.0001). EQ-5D results showed a trend towards improvement. Mean self-rate health status, as measured by the EQ VAS scale increased significantly (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

SLF provides significant reductions in BTP intensity. The results of the BPI and EQ-5D assessments indicate that pain relief is associated with improvement of functioning and enhancement of QoL.

Efficacy and tolerability of intranasal fentanyl spray in cancer patients with breakthrough pain

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to explore the efficacy of intranasal fentanyl spray* (INFS) 400 μg to evaluate 12-week tolerability of the nasal mucosa and to explore safety data for all dose strengths of INFS in patients with cancer-related breakthrough pain (BTP).

METHODS

Patients received a test dose of INFS 50 μg, followed by a titration phase. Those patients with doses titrated to 200 or 400 μg entered a randomized, double-blind, cross-over efficacy phase, in which 8 episodes of BTP were randomly treated with INFS 400 μg (6 episodes) and placebo (2 episodes), followed by a tolerability phase. Patients with doses titrated to 50 or 100 μg entered the tolerability phase directly. Primary outcome was measured by pain intensity difference at 10 minutes, analyzed using ANCOVA, and presented as least square mean difference. Examination of the nasal cavity was conducted at inclusion and after 12 weeks of treatment by an otorhinolaryngologist.

FINDINGS

Forty-six patients were included. Thirty-eight patients' doses were titrated to an effective dose of INFS; 50 μg (n = 8), 100 μg (n = 9), 200 μg (n = 9), and 400 μg (n = 12); 15 patients entered the efficacy phase and 31 entered the tolerability phase. In the efficacy phase, 88 and 29 episodes of BTP were treated with INFS 400 μg and placebo, respectively. Pain intensity difference at 10 minutes least square mean for INFS 400 μg was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.42-3.49) (P < 0.001) and least square mean difference between INFS 400 μg and placebo was 1.1 (95% CI, 0.41-1.79) (P = 0.002). Runny nose (10%) and change in color of the mucosa (9%) were the most frequent findings of nasal examination, and nausea and dizziness were the most frequent treatment-related adverse events. One serious adverse event (ie, respiratory depression) was considered related to INFS.

IMPLICATIONS

INFS 400 μg is effective and nasal tolerability and overall safety profile is acceptable during 12 weeks of use. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01429051.

Improved patient functioning after treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: an open-label study of fentanyl buccal tablet in patients with cancer pain

PURPOSE

This open-label study evaluated the effects of fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) on functioning and mood in cancer patients with breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP).

METHODS

Opioid-tolerant patients in seven European countries with up to four BTcP episodes/day received FBT doses (100-800 μg) identified during open-label titration to treat up to eight BTcP episodes during an open-label treatment period. In countries where FBT was not commercially available, patients could enter an open-label continuation phase. Functionality and satisfaction assessments included change from baseline to the end of the treatment period in the modified Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-7S) seven-item interference subscale, patient's global assessment of satisfaction and ease of use, and Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 330 randomized patients, 218 completed the treatment period and 88 entered the continuation phase. Median background pain intensity was 4.0 (mild) throughout the study. After the treatment period, mean (SD) global modified BPI-7S score improved from 39.7 (15.9) at baseline to 31.6 (16.8) for a mean change of -8.6 (95% confidence interval CI -10.5, -6.7; P < 0.0001), and 74.5% of patients reported improvement in overall status (PGIC) compared with 25.5% who reported no change or worsening (P < 0.001). Treatment-related adverse events (≥2 patients) during the continuation phase were application site erythema (6.9%), application site swelling (4.6%), and vertigo (4.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

FBT may improve patient functioning, mood, and overall satisfaction in the management of BTcP. Long-term data did not indicate new safety concerns with FBT doses up to 800 μg.

Patients with chronic pain and dysphagia (CPD): unmet medical needs and pharmacologic treatment options

BACKGROUND

For properly selected patients experiencing chronic pain, extended-release opioid formulations may represent an appropriate pain management choice. For the many adults, elderly, and children who have medical conditions that make swallowing solid, oral-dose formulations difficult (dysphagia) or painful (odynophagia), this option may be limited. The combination of chronic pain with dysphagia (CPD) presents a challenge to physicians and patients alike when oral opioid analgesia is needed to control pain, but patients are unable to swallow solid, oral dosage forms.

METHODS

A Medline search was performed (1990 to 2013) using the search terms swallowing difficulties, dysphagia, odynophagia, adults, pediatrics, elderly, chronic pain, pain, and opioids. The following websites were searched: American Dysphagia Network, Dysphagia Research Society, World Health Organization, American Pain Society, International Association for the Study of Pain, American Academy of Pain Medicine, and American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians. Chronic pain guidelines from the following professional organizations were searched: American Pain Society, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, British Geriatric Society, European Society of Medical Oncology, World Health Organization, and the European Association for Palliative Care.

FINDINGS

There is an unmet medical need for greater recognition of dysphagia, awareness of potential problems with medication administration in these patients, recognition of alternative drug formulations that are available for use in CPD, and an appreciation that there are new, solid, oral-dose, opioid formulations in development that can mitigate these issues associated with swallowing difficulty while still providing practical, effective analgesia. Current pharmacologic treatments have limitations; new, prospective opioid formulations in clinical development may offer physicians and patients with CPD effective treatment options while mitigating accidental exposure and abuse liability.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of patients with CPD may be larger than is currently anticipated by healthcare providers. Physicians should proactively include a discussion of dysphagia as part of the patient examination. CPD is an unmet medical need. There are novel opioid formulations in clinical development that address the limitations of current opioid treatments. This manuscript reviews the problems associated with dysphagia on medication administration and adherence, currently available treatment options, and opioid analgesic formulations currently in clinical development.

Breakthrough pain management using fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) in combination with around-the-clock (ATC) opioids based on the efficacy and safety of FBT, and its relationship with ATC opioids: results from an open-label, multi-center study in Japanese cancer patients with detailed evaluation

Objective

Rapid analgesic onset opioids, particularly fentanyl buccal tablet, is preferable for managing breakthrough pain. The efficacy and safety of fentanyl buccal tablet and its association with around-the-clock opioids needs to be explored with an option of dose adjustments, more closely reflecting administration in clinical practice. The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of fentanyl buccal tablet in breakthrough pain management in combination with around-the-clock opioids with the dose adjustment option, and explore the dose adjustment's influence on breakthrough pain management using detailed evaluation.

Methods

The 12-week open-label, multi-center study was conducted throughout Japan. Cancer patients aged 20 years or older, experiencing persistent pain controlled with around-the-clock opioids and breakthrough pain with supplemental medications were enrolled. Fentanyl buccal tablet and around-the-clock opioid doses could be adjusted under protocol-specified conditions. Efficacy variables were assessed at each fentanyl buccal tablet administration. Safety was assessed mainly by adverse events.

Results

All efficacy variables showed sustained analgesic effect. Nearly half the patients stayed on the same dose; most fentanyl buccal tablet administrations did not require additional supplemental medications. Dose increase of fentanyl buccal tablet and around-the-clock opioids seemed to improve breakthrough pain intensity and frequency, respectively. Fentanyl buccal tablet and around-the-clock opioid doses were not strongly associated. Treatment-related adverse events were all common with opioid treatment and did not increase over time.

Conclusions

Fentanyl buccal tablet can stably and safely manage breakthrough pain in cancer patients with independent dose adjustment based on detailed evaluation of each patient's condition. Breakthrough pain management using fentanyl buccal tablet with around-the-clock opioids at optimal doses may be an important factor in palliative care for cancer patients with breakthrough pain.

Efficacy and safety of sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablets in patients with breakthrough pain: multicentre prospective study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sublingual fentanyl oral disintegrating tablets (sublingual fentanyl ODT) for the treatment of breakthrough pain (BTP), cancer or non-cancer related, in terms of relief of pain intensity, adverse events (AEs) and patient satisfaction, and to further examine the clinical and epidemiological profile of patients with BTP in a clinical setting.

METHODS

A multicentre, prospective, open-label study was conducted in 19 pain units from Catalonia hospitals (Spain) over a 1-month period. Opioid-tolerant adult patients experiencing episodes of BTP intensity >5 on a visual analogue scale (VAS) during the 12-24 h before screening or AEs related to their previous rescue medication for BTP received sublingual fentanyl ODT in the course of routine clinical practice and completed a 30-day study period consisting of five assessment points: days 0 (baseline), 3, 7, 15 and 30. The efficacy was assessed by collecting pain intensity and pain relief data at baseline and at each assessment. AEs were recorded by investigators throughout the study during clinic visits and telephone follow-ups. For all patients, titration was begun with an initial dose of 100 μg. No more than two doses were allowed to treat an episode and patients might wait at least 4 h before treating another BTP episode with sublingual fentanyl ODT. The dose was increased by 100 μg multiples up to 400 μg as needed; and by 200 μg multiples up from 400 to 800 μg, the maximum titration step.

RESULTS

A total of 182 patients were enrolled and 177 (97.2 %) completed the study: 37 had breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) and 145 had breakthrough non-cancer pain (BTncP). The mean pain intensity showed a statistically significant improvement at the first assessment point and at all assessments thereafter (p < 0.0001). At the end of the study, the time lag between administration and first effect of sublingual fentanyl ODT was ≤10 min in 69.0 % (60 % BTcP and 71.2 % BTncP). The number of daily BTP episodes decreased in both groups, but it was statistically significant in BTcP. 114 patients (62.64 %) experienced AEs during the study. AEs recorded included nausea, vomiting, somnolence and constipation, and seven (4.49 %) were considered severe. No death or discontinuation was considered related to AEs.

CONCLUSION

Sublingual fentanyl ODT provided rapid and consistent relief from BTP, both in cancer and non-cancer patients. It was well-tolerated and well-accepted by patients in routine clinical practice.

Efficacy of sublingual fentanyl vs. oral morphine for cancer-related breakthrough pain

INTRODUCTION

Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) is recognized as a clinically significant complication of chronic cancer pain with most BTcP episodes peaking in intensity within a few minutes and lasting for approximately 30 min. Although a number of rapid-onset fentanyl preparations have been developed in the last decade, BTcP is still typically managed through the use of rescue doses of oral morphine but a comparative study of sublingual fentanyl and oral morphine is still lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy, tolerability, and patient satisfaction of sublingual fentanyl citrate (SLF) and oral morphine solution (OM) in the treatment of BTcP.

METHODS

In this prospective, longitudinal, controlled-study, 40 patients with BTcP were allocated to receive oral morphine (OM) or sublingual fentanyl (SLF). Pain intensity level on a 0-10 numerical rating visual analog scale (VAS), frequency of BTcP throughout the day, onset of relief (0-5, 6-10, 11-15, or over 16 min), time required for dose titration, patient satisfaction and adverse effects were assessed at 3, 7, 15, and 30 days after starting the treatment.

RESULTS

Mean doses of opioids for BTcP were 235 ± 23.4 μg (SLF) and 38 ± 5.2 mg (OM). The mean pain intensity levels were significantly lower with SLF than OM at 3 days (6.0 vs. 6.95; p = 0,001), 7 days (4.15 vs. 6.25, p < 0.001), 15 days (3.45 vs. 5.35, p < 0.001), and 30 days (3.05 vs. 4.45, p < 0.001). SLF provided significantly faster relief for BTcP than OM (p < 0.001) with a shorter dose titration period (mean 6.6 ± 3.3 vs. 13.3 ± 4.9 days; p < 0.001) and better satisfaction scores and with a very good safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of SLF might provide a more effective treatment option than oral morphine for BTcP.

An evaluation of total disintegration time for three different doses of sublingual fentanyl tablets in patients with breakthrough pain

Introduction

Breakthrough pain is common among patients with cancer and presents challenges to effective pain management. Breakthrough pain is characterized by rapid onset, severe intensity, and duration typically lasting <1 h. Thus, optimal relief from breakthrough pain is best attained by administering analgesics with dissolution times and bioavailabilities that closely match the onset and duration of breakthrough pain. The objective of this study was to assess complete disintegration time of three different doses of sublingual fentanyl tablets in opioid-tolerant patients.

Methods

This was a single-center, non-randomized, open-label study. Opioid-tolerant adult patients (N = 30) with chronic pain were assigned to one of three dose groups and self-administered a single 100, 200, or 300 μg sublingual fentanyl tablet (Abstral^®, Galena Biopharma, Portland, OR, USA). Time to complete disintegration was measured by each patient with a stopwatch and independently verified by study personnel.

Results

Disintegration time (mean ± SD) for sublingual fentanyl tablets (all doses) was 88.2 ± 55.1 s. Mean disintegration times tended to be slightly longer for the 200 μg (96.7 ± 57.9 s) and 300 μg doses (98.6 ± 64.8 s) compared to the 100 μg dose (69.5 ± 40.5 s). Differences were not statistically significant. Disintegration time was not significantly different between men and women and was not affected by age.

Conclusion

Sublingual fentanyl tablets dissolved rapidly (average time <2 min) in all patients, with the higher doses taking slightly more time to dissolve.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40122-013-0019-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Considerations in selecting rapid-onset opioids for the management of breakthrough pain

Breakthrough pain (BTP) is a transitory pain that occurs despite the use of long-term, around-the-clock analgesia. It is highly prevalent in certain populations and places a significant burden on patients, their families, caregivers, and health-care systems. Despite its prevalence and impact, BTP is sometimes unrecognized and often undertreated. Various formulations of fentanyl – a rapid-onset opioid with short duration of action – are available for the management of BTP. The efficacy of formulations using transmucosal, transbuccal, sublingual, and intranasal administration routes has been demonstrated for BTP treatment in clinical trials. However, a lack of head-to-head trials evaluating their relative efficacy makes it challenging for physicians to reach informed decisions on the most efficacious intervention for individual patients. In the absence of clear data on the relative efficacy of fentanyl formulations, prescribing decisions need to be based on physician understanding and experience and product cost and availability, taking into account the individual patient’s needs, the ability of the patient or caregivers to administer medication, and the patient’s wishes. This review evaluates current pharmacologic methods of alleviating BTP and discusses factors that should be considered when selecting the most appropriate formulation for individual patients. With the range of fentanyl formulations available, it is now possible to successfully address BTP in the majority of patients.

Fentanyl (transmucosal)

Therapeutic Reviews aim to provide essential independent information for health professionals about drugs used in palliative and hospice care. Additional content is available on www.palliativedrugs.com. Country-specific books (Hospice and Palliative Care Formulary USA, and Palliative Care Formulary, British and Canadian editions) are also available and can be ordered from www.palliativedrugs.com. The series editors welcome feedback on the articles (hq@palliativedrugs.com).

A comprehensive review of rapid-onset opioids for breakthrough pain

Breakthrough pain (BTP) is a transitory pain (reaching maximum severity in ~15 minutes and lasting ~60 minutes in patients with cancer) that occurs despite the management of chronic pain with long-term around-the-clock analgesia. BTP occurs in 33-65% of patients with chronic cancer pain and in ~70% of patients with chronic noncancer pain. BTP has historically been managed with short-acting opioids; however, these medications have a pharmacokinetic profile that does not correlate with the sudden onset and short time to maximum severity of BTP. Interest in rapid-onset opioids to relieve BTP has therefore been growing. This comprehensive review aims to summarize the currently available clinical data for the approved rapid-onset opioids, which comprise different formulations of fentanyl, a μ-opioid receptor agonist with anaesthetic and analgesic properties. Administration routes for fentanyl in the management of BTP currently include the transmucosal and intranasal routes; an intrapulmonary formulation is also in development. The findings of this review suggest that the efficacy and safety of the approved rapid-onset opioids are comparable.

Efficacy and safety of fentanyl sublingual spray for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A number of transmucosal fentanyl formulations have been developed for the management of breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP). Sublingual delivery of fentanyl, formulated as fentanyl sublingual spray, offers the potential for more rapid and greater absorption of fentanyl and associated onset of analgesic effect compared with other formulations. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of fentanyl sublingual spray for the treatment of BTCP.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial conducted in opioid-tolerant patients with BTCP. An open-label titration period was followed by a double-blind treatment period during which patients received fentanyl sublingual spray (100-1600 mcg) or placebo.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00538850.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary efficacy measure was summed pain intensity difference at 30 minutes (SPID(30)). Secondary efficacy measures included total pain relief at 30 minutes (TOTPAR(30)) and patient global evaluation of study medication at 30 minutes. Efficacy measures were also assessed at various time points from 5-60 minutes postdose. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients were treated during the titration period, of whom 98 (75.4%) entered the double-blind period. Relative to placebo, fentanyl sublingual spray significantly improved mean SPID scores from 5 minutes (p = 0.0219) through 60 minutes (p < 0.0001), including the primary endpoint at 30 minutes (p < 0.0001). Fentanyl sublingual spray produced significantly greater pain relief (expressed in terms of TOTPAR) from 5 through 60 minutes (p < 0.0001), and significantly greater global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (p < 0.0001), compared with placebo. During double-blind treatment, the most frequently reported adverse events were nausea (7.1%), hyperhidrosis (5.1%), and peripheral edema (5.1%). Serious adverse events occurred in seven patients (5.4%) during titration and six (6.1%) during double-blind treatment; none were considered related to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that treatment with fentanyl sublingual spray results in effective relief of BTCP, with a rapid onset of action, and is well tolerated.

Development of film dosage form containing allopurinol for prevention and treatment of oral mucositis

Film dosage forms (FDs) containing allopurinol (AP) were prepared using a casting method with water-soluble polysaccharides, such as sodium alginate (ALG), and the release profile of AP from FDs was investigated in limited dissolution medium. Some ALGs were able to form FDs incorporating AP, and the thickness was about 50 μm. All FDs were easy to handle, though the rheological properties varied with ALG species. AP was homogenously present throughout the FDs and was released with disintegration in 10 mL of physiological saline. These results confirmed that FDs are useful for preventing or treating localized problems in the oral cavity, such as mucositis. FDs are also useful for administering drugs to cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.

Transformation of acute cancer pain to chronic cancer pain syndromes

For many cancer survivors, disease-related long-term morbidities and the application of advanced cancer treatments have resulted in the development of a chronic pain state. This brief review explores the relationship between what is known about the treatment of active cancer pain syndromes-both continuous pain and breakthrough pain-and persisting pain syndromes in cancer survivors. We also posit that because there is evidence to suggest that poorly treated acute pain can lead to protracted pain conditions, acute pain should be recognized and treated promptly, both for short- and long-term gain. In the short term, better acute pain treatment can improve functionality and psychological well-being, whereas in the long term, mounting evidence suggests that it could prevent of future chronic pain.

Sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet in daily practice: efficacy, safety and tolerability in patients with breakthrough cancer pain

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) affects more than half of patients with cancer pain and has severe detrimental impacts on quality of life (QoL). This study evaluated the efficacy, QoL impact and safety of sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet (sublingual fentanyl ODT), for the treatment of BTcP in a clinical setting.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a prospective, multi-center phase IV study. Opioid-tolerant adult patients with BTcP received sublingual fentanyl ODT in the course of routine clinical practice, and completed questionnaires over a 28-day observation period. Efficacy was assessed using measures of maximum BTcP intensity and the times to first effect and maximum effect of sublingual fentanyl ODT. Changes in QoL were evaluated using the modified pain disability index (mPDI) and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Adverse events were recorded throughout.

RESULTS

Of 217 enrolled patients, 181 (83.4%) completed the observation period. During the study, 3163 episodes were treated with a mean dose of 401.4 μg per episode. The study recorded a significant improvement in maximum BTcP intensity with sublingual fentanyl ODT, compared with baseline (p < 0.0001). Patients reported experiencing the first effects of the study drug within 5 minutes of administration in 67.7% of episodes, and maximum effect within 30 minutes in 63.2% of episodes. mPDI and HADS scores significantly improved during the observation period (p < 0.0001). Sublingual fentanyl ODT was well-tolerated, with 12 patients (5.5%) experiencing ≥1 study drug-related adverse event. Study limitations include a modest size and duration, and the single-arm design.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the conditions of a phase IV study, sublingual fentanyl ODT was effective and well-tolerated for the treatment of BTcP in opioid-tolerant cancer patients. Study treatment was associated with significant improvements in BTcP intensity and QoL scores, and patients reported rapid onset of action in the majority of episodes.