The Barmer study: impact of standardized warming of the injection site to enhance insulin absorption and reduce prandial insulin requirements and hypoglycemia in obese patients with diabetes mellitus

Implications of obesity for drug administration and absorption from subcutaneous and intramuscular injections: A primer

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

To discuss the potential implications of obesity for drug administration and absorption from subcutaneous (SC) and intramuscular (IM) injection sites.

SUMMARY

The SC and IM routes are useful for the parenteral administration of medications to optimize pharmacokinetic properties such as time to onset and duration of effect, for cost considerations, or for ease of administration, such as when intravenous access is unavailable. The choice of SC or IM injection depends on the specific medication, with SC administration preferred for products such as insulin where a slower and more sustained response is desirable, while IM administration is usually preferred for products such as vaccines where more rapid absorption leads to a more rapid antibody response. Obesity has the potential to influence the rate and extent of absorption, as well as adverse effects, of medications administered by the SC or IM route through changes in SC tissue composition and depth or by inadvertent administration of IM medications into SC tissue because of improper needle length. Potential adverse effects associated with IM or SC injections in addition to pain, bruising, and hematoma formation include sciatic nerve injury, particularly with IM injection in the upper outer quadrant of the buttock; bone contusion or rarely osteonecrosis if the IM injection is excessively deep; and granulomas, fat necrosis, and calcification with SC injection.

CONCLUSION

Issues related to medication absorption in obese patients are likely to become more prominent in the future with increasing approvals of a wide range of biotherapeutic agents administered by SC injection. Studies should be directed toward these and other agents to assist with dosing decisions in this challenging population.

Towards a Physiological Prandial Insulin Profile: Enhancement of Subcutaneously Injected Prandial Insulin Using Local Warming Devices

The need to develop an insulin delivery system that can closely mimic physiologically induced changes in prandial insulin release has been a major research target since the discovery of insulin. The challenges facing existing insulin delivery systems, related to relatively slow pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, have been further highlighted by rapid advances in diabetes technology and progress in artificial pancreas research. Despite the growing interest in alternative routes of insulin administration, the subcutaneous route remains-at least for now-the preferred route for insulin administration. In this article, we review efforts aimed at developing subcutaneously injected ultrafast-acting insulin and measures aimed at enhancing insulin absorption, focusing on local warming devices.

Improved Postprandial Glucose Control Using the InsuPad Device in Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: Injection Site Warming to Improve Glycemic Control

BACKGROUND

Delays in the time-action profiles of premeal boluses of rapid-acting insulin analogs contribute to early postmeal hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes. We tested whether applying local heat to skin around the injection site to increase the rate of insulin absorption reduces postprandial hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with type 2 diabetes (4 females; age 61.6 ± 8.4 years, HbA1c 8.42 ± 1.13%; BMI 29.10 ± 5.61 kg/m(2)) on intensified insulin therapy underwent 5-hour meal tolerance tests (MTTs) with a standardized liquid meal after an overnight fast on 2 study days. Subjects injected 0.2 U/kg of insulin aspart or lispro subcutaneously into the abdominal skin on both days with and without the use of the InsuPad device.

RESULTS

Following the premeal bolus injection of rapid-acting insulin analog, infusion site warming led to a rise in plasma insulin levels to peak concentrations that were significantly earlier than without skin warming (mean ± SD 52 ± 26.7 vs 80 ± 51.3 minutes, P < .005) as well as increase in plasma insulin levels during the first hour after injection (mean ± SD 63.5 ± 32.7 IU vs 48.0 ± 25.0 uU.min/ml, P = .019). As a result, the area under the curve of the postprandial glucose excursion during the first 2 hours (the primary study outcome) and the entire 5 hours after the meal were significantly reduced (P = .007 and P = .03, respectively) with skin warming around the injection site.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Use of the InsuPad to increase the rate of insulin absorption provides an effective means to achieve better control of postmeal glucose excursions in type 2 diabetic patients receiving premeal injections of rapid-acting insulin analogs.

Improved insulin absorption by means of standardized injection site modulation results in a safer and more efficient prandial insulin treatment. A review of the existing clinical data

Temperature changes on the surface of the skin lead to modifications of subcutaneous microcirculation. This phenomenon is employed in a standardized way by the InsuPad device to stabilize skin conditions before injections, which is associated with enhanced prandial insulin absorption. Three programmed warming cycles to 40°C within 50 minutes are resulting in faster insulin appearance in the plasma. Early standardized meal tolerance studies indicated a substantial improvement in postprandial glucose control when the same short-acting insulin analog dose was applied using InsuPad, and a dose reduction by 20% resulted in comparable glucose excursions. Similar results were obtained when patients applied the device under real-world conditions for 1 month. The InsuPad device was also tested in a prospective, controlled, parallel 3-month real-world study with 145 well-controlled but insulin-resistant patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Patients were treated to target in both treatment arms (6.2 ± 0.5% in each group), with or without the device. However, patients with InsuPad needed 28% less prandial insulin, needed 12.5% less total insulin, and had 46% less confirmed hypoglycemic events (blood glucose < 63 mg/dL) as compared to the control group. Except for very few inflammatory or allergic skin reactions, there were no device-specific adverse events reported from these studies. In conclusion, use of InsuPad when applying prandial insulin doses may result in a safer and more efficient treatment of type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

Standardized modulation of the injection site allows for insulin dose reduction without deterioration of metabolic control

OBJECTIVES

Use of an injection site modulation device (InsuPad) in intensive insulin treatment reduces frequency of hypoglycemia and prandial insulin requirements by enhancing subcutaneous microcirculation. This meal tolerance test (MTT) investigation was performed as a sub-study during the real-world BARMER study to demonstrate non-inferiority of the reduced insulin doses observed in this study with respect to metabolic control.

METHODS

The MTT was performed at baseline and after 3 months in insulin treated diabetes patients using the modulation device vs. a control group without device. The dose used for the MTT was individually calculated based on the prandial insulin records from the patient diaries before the test. Blood was drawn for determination of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, proinsulin, triglycerides, free fatty acids, nitrotyrosine, and asymmetric dimethyl-arginine (ADMA) at multiple time-points from 0 to 300 min. A total of 32 patients from one site were included into this MTT study (8 female, 7 type 1 diabetes, age: 49.9 ± 12.5 yrs, HbA1c: 7.2 ± 0.5%).

RESULTS

During the BARMER study, mean HbA1c was treated to target (<6.5%) in both groups. The prandial insulin dose decreased in the MTT modulation device group by -17.1%, but remained unchanged in the control group (-0.1%, p < 0.001). No change was seen for the basal insulin dose in both treatment arms. There were no differences between the groups with respect to the postprandial curves for glucose, C-peptide, intact proinsulin, free fatty acids, and triglycerides. Insulin absorption was faster with the modulation device (Tmax: 60 ± 28 min vs. 99 ± 46 min, p < 0.05). Key limitations are the small patient sample size and impossibility to determine the short-term effects of device use.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meal tolerance sub-study confirm that the observed prandial insulin dose reduction when using the injection site modulation device has no negative impact on postprandial metabolism.