1
|
Meertens A, Van Coile L, Van Iseghem T, Brochez L, Verhaeghe N, Hoorens I. Cost-of-Illness of Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:751-765. [PMID: 38755518 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01389-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Skin cancer's rising incidence demands understanding of its economic impact. The current understanding is fragmented because of the various methodological approaches applied in skin cancer cost-of-illness studies. OBJECTIVE This study systematically reviews melanoma and keratinocyte carcinoma cost-of-illness studies to provide an overview of the applied methodological approaches and to identify the main cost drivers. METHODS This systematic review was conducted adhering to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from December 2022 until December 2023 using a search strategy with entry terms related to the concepts of skin cancer and cost of illness. The records were screened on the basis of the title and abstract and subsequently on full text against predetermined eligibility criteria. Articles published before 2012 were excluded. A nine-item checklist adapted for cost-of-illness studies was used to assess the methodological quality of the articles. RESULTS This review included a total of 45 studies, together evaluating more than half a million patients. The majority of the studies (n = 36) focused on melanoma skin cancer, a few (n = 3) focused on keratinocyte carcinomas, and 6 studies examined both. Direct costs were estimated in all studies, while indirect costs were only estimated in nine studies. Considerable heterogeneity was observed across studies, mainly owing to disparities in study population, methodological approaches, included cost categories, and differences in healthcare systems. In melanoma skin cancer, both direct and indirect costs increased with progressing tumor stage. In advanced stage melanoma, systemic therapy emerged as the main cost driver. In contrast, for keratinocyte carcinoma no obvious cost drivers were identified. CONCLUSIONS A homogeneous skin cancer cost-of-illness study design would be beneficial to enhance between-studies comparability, identification of cost drivers, and support evidence-based decision-making for skin cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annick Meertens
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Laura Van Coile
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tijs Van Iseghem
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lieve Brochez
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nick Verhaeghe
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Public Health, Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Hoorens
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li SN, Wan X, Peng LB, Li YM, Li JH. Cost-effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibition and targeted treatment in combination as adjuvant treatment of patient with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:49. [PMID: 36653848 PMCID: PMC9847087 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09058-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted treatments have improved the health outcomes of patients with advanced melanoma. However, due to the high cost of novel therapies, it is crucial to evaluate their value by considering both effectiveness and cost. To compare the cost-effectiveness of these novel agents (atezolizumab-vemurafenib-cobimetinib, vemurafenib-plus-cobimetinib, dabrafenib-plus-trametinib, and encorafenib-plus-binimetinib) for first-line treatment of metastatic melanoma with the BRAFV600 mutation. METHODS A patient-level model was developed to project the health outcomes of 4 strategies for patients with advanced melanoma. We estimated transition probabilities from the IMspire150 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02908672), COMBI-AD (NCT01682083), and COLUMBUS (NCT01909453) trials using a parametric survival model. All health outcomes, including direct cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), were estimated from the US payer perspective. Lifetime cost, QALYs, life-years (LYs), and ICERs were calculated. Univariable and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test model robustness, along with multiple scenario analyses. RESULTS Of the 4 competing strategies, atezolizumab-vemurafenib-cobimetinib produced the best health outcomes, and the vemurafenib-cobimetinib strategy was the least expensive option. Atezolizumab-vemurafenib-cobimetinib, dabrafenib-plus-trametinib, and vemurafenib-cobimetinib formed the cost-effective frontier, indicating that the ordered ICERs were $325,113/QALYs for dabrafenib-plus-trametinib vs. vemurafenib-cobimetinib strategies and $2,247,500/QALYs for atezolizumab-vemurafenib-cobimetinib vs. dabrafenib-plus-trametinib strategies. Encorafenib-plus-binimetinib was dominated by the other 3 competing strategies. The drug price and first-line utility significantly influenced the model utcomes. CONCLUSIONS For BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma, the vemurafenib-cobimetinib strategy could be considered the most cost-effective treatment at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si Ni Li
- grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011 China ,grid.10784.3a0000 0004 1937 0482The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hongkong, China ,grid.11835.3e0000 0004 1936 9262School of Health and Related Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Xiaomin Wan
- grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011 China
| | - Liu Bao Peng
- grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011 China
| | - Ya Min Li
- grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011 China
| | - Jian He Li
- grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011 China ,grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Present address: The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011 Hunan China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Boemmel-Wegmann S, Brown JD, Diaby V, Huo J, Silver N, Park H. Health Care Utilization and Costs Associated With Systemic First-Line Metastatic Melanoma Therapies in the United States. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 18:e163-e174. [PMID: 34228489 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE US Food and Drug Administration approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Our aim was to assess health care resource utilization and costs for patients with metastatic melanoma treated with systemic therapies in first line between January 2012 and December 2017. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with metastatic melanoma using MarketScan data. We included patients diagnosed with melanoma and secondary malignant neoplasm who used pembrolizumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, ipilimumab plus nivolumab, BRAF-inhibitor (BRAF-i) plus MEK inhibitor (MEK-i), BRAF-i or MEK-i monotherapy, or chemotherapy in first line. We compared health care utilization and costs per patient per month (PPPM) using two-part and generalized linear models. RESULTS We identified 1,870 patients, including 185 pembrolizumab, 103 nivolumab, 689 ipilimumab, 185 nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 214 BRAF-i plus MEK-i, 240 BRAF-i or MEK-i monotherapy, and 254 chemotherapy users. Highest PPPM rates of hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and outpatient visits were observed in patients with ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy (adjusted difference v pembrolizumab [aDiff], 0.18, 0.12, and 0.88, respectively; all P < .001). Ipilimumab monotherapy users (aDiff, 0.07 and 0.93; all P < .001) and chemotherapy users (aDiff, 0.10 and 2.63; all P < .001) showed higher PPPM rates of hospitalizations and outpatient visits compared with pembrolizumab users, respectively. Utilization rates in nivolumab, BRAF-i plus MEK-i, and BRAF-i or MEK-i groups were similar to the pembrolizumab group. Highest PPPM total costs and drug-related costs were observed in the ipilimumab group ($80,139 US dollars [USD] and $70,051 USD; all P < .001), followed by the ipilimumab plus nivolumab ($71,689 USD and $56,217 USD; all P < .001) and the BRAF-i plus MEK-i group ($31,184 USD and $19,648 USD; all P < .001). PPPM costs in the nivolumab group were similar to the pembrolizumab group. CONCLUSION Significant differences in health care resource utilization and costs were found across first-line metastatic melanoma regimens. Utilization rates were highest in patients using ipilimumab-containing therapies. High drug costs constituted a major fraction of total PPPM health care costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha van Boemmel-Wegmann
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Joshua D Brown
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Vakaramoko Diaby
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Jinhai Huo
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Natalie Silver
- Department of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Haesuk Park
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rai P, Shen C, Kolodney J, Kelly KM, Scott VG, Sambamoorthi U. Immune checkpoint inhibitor use, multimorbidity and healthcare expenditures among older adults with late-stage melanoma. Immunotherapy 2021; 13:103-112. [PMID: 33148082 PMCID: PMC8008205 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2020-0152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study is to assess the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and multimorbidity on healthcare expenditures among older patients with late-stage melanoma. Materials & methods: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results linked with Medicare claims was conducted. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze adjusted relationships of ICI, multimorbidity and ICI-multimorbidity interaction on average healthcare expenditures. Results: Patients who received ICI and those who had multimorbidity had significantly higher average total healthcare expenditures compared with ICI nonusers and no multimorbidity. In the fully adjusted model using ICI-multimorbidity interaction, no excess cost was added by multimorbidity. Conclusion: Use of ICIs, regardless of multimorbidity, is associated with increased healthcare expenditures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pragya Rai
- Department of Pharmaceutical Systems & Policy, West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, Morgantown 26506, WV
| | - Chan Shen
- Department of Surgery Chief, Division of Outcomes, Research & Quality Cancer Institute, Cancer Control Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey 17033, PA
| | - Joanna Kolodney
- Department of Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown 26506, WV
| | - Kimberly M Kelly
- Department of Pharmaceutical Systems & Policy, West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, Morgantown 26506, WV
| | - Virginia G Scott
- Department of Pharmaceutical Systems & Policy, West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, Morgantown 26506, WV
| | - Usha Sambamoorthi
- Department of Pharmaceutical Systems & Policy, West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, Morgantown 26506, WV
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dai WF, Beca J, Croxford R, Isaranuwatchai W, Menjak IB, Petrella TM, Mittmann N, Earle CC, Gavura S, Mercer RE, Hanna TP, Chan KKW. Real-world, population-based cohort study of toxicity and resource utilization of second-line ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma in Ontario, Canada. Int J Cancer 2020; 148:1910-1918. [PMID: 33105030 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Revised: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Second-line ipilimumab has been publicly funded in Ontario for metastatic melanoma (MM) since September 2012. We examined real-world toxicity of second-line ipilimumab compared to standard second-line treatments prior to funding. MM patients who received systemic treatment from April 2005 to March 2015 were included. Patients receiving second-line ipilimumab after September 2012 were considered as cases, and those who received second-line treatment prior to the funding date were included as historical controls. Outcomes assessed include treatment-related mortality, any-cause hospital visits, ipilimumab-related hospital visits and specialist visits (eg, endocrinologists, ophthalmologists, gastroenterologists, rheumatologists and respirologists), which were captured from up to 30 and/or 90 days after end of second-line treatment. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences between groups. Odds ratios (ORs) from logistic regressions and rate ratios (RRs) from rate regressions were used to assess differences between groups. We identified 329 MM patients who received second-line treatments (ipilimumab: 189; controls: 140). Ipilimumab was associated greater any-cause (60.1% vs 45.7%; OR = 1.81; P value = .019) and ipilimumab-related (47.2% vs 31.9%; OR = 1.91; P value = .011) hospital visits. Adjusting for different follow-up days, ipilimumab was associated with higher rates of all-cause (RR = 1.56 [95%CI: 1.12-2.16]), and ipilimumab-related (RR = 2.18 [95% CI: 1.45-3.27]) hospital visits. Patients receiving ipilimumab were more likely to visit specialist involved in immunotherapy toxicity management (23.5% vs 13.7%; P value = .04). Compared to historical second-line treatments, second-line ipilimumab was associated with more health service utilization (specifically hospital visits and specialist visits), suggestive of potentially increased toxicity in the real world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Fang Dai
- Provincial Drug Reimbursement Program, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jaclyn Beca
- Provincial Drug Reimbursement Program, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Excellence in Economic Analysis Research, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ines B Menjak
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Teresa M Petrella
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicole Mittmann
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Canada
| | - Craig C Earle
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scott Gavura
- Provincial Drug Reimbursement Program, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rebecca E Mercer
- Provincial Drug Reimbursement Program, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy P Hanna
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Canada.,Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kelvin K W Chan
- Provincial Drug Reimbursement Program, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Couchoud C, Fagnoni P, Aubin F, Westeel V, Maurina T, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Gerard C, Kroemer M, Borg C, Limat S, Nerich V. Economic evaluations of cancer immunotherapy: a systematic review and quality evaluation. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2020; 69:1947-1958. [PMID: 32676716 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-020-02646-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Scientific advances in the last decade have highlighted the use of immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, to be an effective strategy in cancer therapy. However, these immunotherapeutic agents are expensive, and their use must take into account economic criteria. Thus, the objective of the present study was to systematically identify and review published EE related to the use of ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab in melanoma, lung cancer, head and neck cancer or renal cell carcinoma, and to assess their quality. METHODS The systematic literature research was conducted on Medline via PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify economic evaluations published before July 2018. The quality of each selected economic evaluation was assessed by two independent reviewers using the Drummond checklist. RESULTS Our systematic review was based on 32 economic evaluations using different methodological approaches, different perspectives and different time horizons. Three-quarters of the economic evaluations are full (n = 24) with a Drummond score ≥ 7, synonymous of "high quality". Among them, 66% reported a strategy that was cost-effective. The most assessed immunotherapeutic agent was nivolumab. In patients with renal cell carcinoma or head and neck cancer, it was less likely to be cost-effective than in patients with melanoma or lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS Whether or not these findings will be confirmed remains to be seen when market approval to cover more indications is extended and new effective immunotherapeutic agents become available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Couchoud
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besancon Cedex, France
| | - Philippe Fagnoni
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital, Dijon, France
- INSERM UMR 866, University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
- EPICAD LNC UMR 1231, University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - François Aubin
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Besançon, France
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France
| | - Virginie Westeel
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France
- Pulmonary Medicine Department, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France
| | - Tristan Maurina
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Claire Gerard
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besancon Cedex, France
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France
| | - Marie Kroemer
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besancon Cedex, France
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France
| | - Christophe Borg
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Samuel Limat
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besancon Cedex, France
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France
| | - Virginie Nerich
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besancon Cedex, France.
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Healthcare Costs of Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma in the Era of Immunotherapeutic and Targeted Drugs. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12041003. [PMID: 32325748 PMCID: PMC7225943 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12041003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapeutic and targeted drugs improved survival of patients with metastatic melanoma. There is, however, a lack of evidence regarding their healthcare costs in clinical practice. The aim of our study was to provide insight into real-world healthcare costs of patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Data were obtained from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry for patients who were registered between July 2012 and December 2018. Mean total/monthly costs per patient were reported for all patients, patients who did not receive systemic therapy, and patients who received systemic therapy. Furthermore, mean episode/monthly costs per line of therapy and drug were reported for patients who received systemic therapy. Mean total/monthly costs were € 89,240/€ 6809: € 7988/€ 2483 for patients who did not receive systemic therapy (n = 784) and € 105,078/€ 7652 for patients who received systemic therapy (n = 4022). Mean episode/monthly costs were the highest for nivolumab plus ipilimumab (€ 79,675/€ 16,976), ipilimumab monotherapy (€ 79,110/€ 17,252), and dabrafenib plus trametinib (€ 77,053/€ 12,015). Dacarbazine yielded the lowest mean episode/monthly costs (€ 6564/€ 2027). Our study showed that immunotherapeutic and targeted drugs had a large impact on real-world healthcare costs. As new drugs continue entering the treatment landscape for (metastatic) melanoma, it remains crucial to monitor whether the benefits of these drugs outweigh their costs.
Collapse
|
8
|
Joseph RW, Shillington AC, Lee TA, Macahilig CP, Diede SJ, Dave V, Harshaw Q, Scherrer E, Liu FX. Hospitalization and emergency department utilization in patients with advanced melanoma receiving pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab plus nivolumab in US academic centers. J Med Econ 2020; 23:132-138. [PMID: 31750751 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1696349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Background: Both pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) and ipilimumab + nivolumab (IPI + NIVO) are FDA-approved immunotherapy regimens for advanced melanoma (AM). Each regimen has different toxicity profiles potentially impacting healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). This study compared real-world hospitalization and emergency department (ED) utilization within 12 months of therapy initiation of each regimen.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in AM patients ≥18 years old initiating PEMBRO or IPI + NIVO between January 1, 2016-December 30, 2017. Patients were identified from 12 US-based academic and satellite centers. All-cause hospitalization ED visits were identified. These events were used to calculate rates per 1,000 patient months. Utilization between groups was compared using multivariate logistic regression.Results: In total, 400 patients were included (200 PEMBRO, 200 IPI + NIVO). PEMBRO vs IPI + NIVO patients had poorer Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status, 29% 2-4, vs 12% (p < .001); more diabetes, 21% vs 13% (p = .045); were more often PD-L1 expression positive, 77% vs 63% (p = .011); and less likely BRAF mutant, 35% vs 50% (p = .003). The proportion with more than one hospitalization over 12 months was 17% PEMBRO vs 24% IPI + NIVO. Less than 2% had more than one admission and none had more than two. Unadjusted mean (SD) hospitalizations per 1,000 patient-months were 16 (37) and 20 (38), PEMBRO and IPI + NIVO, respectively. Adjusted odds ratio for hospitalization was 0.6 (95% CI = 0.3-0.9; p = .027) for PEMBRO vs IPI + NIVO. ED visits occurred in 18% vs 21%, PEMBRO and IPI + NIVO, respectively, 0.7 (p = .186).Conclusions: PEMBRO patients had a significantly lower probability of hospitalization through 12 months vs IPI + NIVO. The probability of ED visits did not differ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W Joseph
- Department of Oncology (Medical), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Todd A Lee
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes, and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Vaidehi Dave
- Medical Data Analytics (MDA), Parsippany, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shah S, Raskin L, Cohan D, Freeman M, Hamid O. Treatment patterns of malignant melanoma in the United States from 2011 to 2016: a retrospective cohort study. Curr Med Res Opin 2020; 36:63-72. [PMID: 31469305 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1662688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background: Since 2011, the approval of several new agents has improved treatment options for malignant melanoma. We describe treatment patterns for malignant melanoma in the United States from the MarketScan database from 2011 to 2016.Methods: Treatments used for patients aged >18 years diagnosed with malignant melanoma after January 1, 2011 and enrolled in the Truven MarketScan database were analyzed. Patient data were collected for the 12-month period from the date of the first melanoma diagnosis to either death, the pre-specified study end date (August 31, 2016), or date of termination of health insurance. Treatment patterns from 2011-2013 and 2014-2016 were analyzed according to agent, year of drug administration, and line of therapy.Results: From 2011 to 2016, use of cytokines (63.8; 13.3%) and chemotherapy (19.6; 12.9%) decreased, and use of checkpoint inhibitors increased (2.0; 49.9%). Checkpoint inhibitor use also increased across all lines of therapy from 2011-2013 and 2014-2016. Use of BRAF/MEK inhibitors remained relatively stable from 2011 to 2016 (6.5-12.5%); however, the use of vemurafenib monotherapy decreased (6.5; 0.8%), and treatment with combination regimens increased (0; 10.9%) from 2011-2016. BRAF/MEK inhibitor use only increased in the first line setting from 2011-2013 (9.7%) to 2014-2016 (11.2%).Conclusion: With the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors, BRAF/MEK inhibitors, and targeted therapies, the therapeutic landscape for the treatment of metastatic melanoma has shifted dramatically away from cytokines and chemotherapy. Treatment patterns will likely continue to evolve as scientific advances are made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shweta Shah
- Global Health Economics, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Leon Raskin
- Center for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - David Cohan
- Medical Affairs, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | | | - Omid Hamid
- The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cowey CL, Liu FX, Black-Shinn J, Stevinson K, Boyd M, Frytak JR, Ebbinghaus SW. Pembrolizumab Utilization and Outcomes for Advanced Melanoma in US Community Oncology Practices. J Immunother 2019; 41:86-95. [PMID: 29252916 PMCID: PMC5811239 DOI: 10.1097/cji.0000000000000204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The programmed death-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety in clinical trials for treating advanced (unresectable/metastatic) melanoma. We investigated the real-world utilization of pembrolizumab and associated patient outcomes for advanced melanoma in US community oncology practices. This retrospective, observational study used deidentified data from electronic health records for adult patients with advanced melanoma who received pembrolizumab at The US Oncology Network sites from September 2014 through December 2015, with follow-up through September 2016. Patients enrolled in clinical trials were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and physician-stated progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed from pembrolizumab initiation using Kaplan-Meier, and associations between pembrolizumab therapy and OS/PFS, using multivariable Cox regression. Of 168 patients studied, 110 (65%) were male; the median age was 66 years (range, 26–over 90). Pembrolizumab was prescribed as first-line, second-line, and third-line/later for 39 (23%), 87 (52%), and 42 (25%) patients, respectively. In total, 41 patients (24%) had brain metastases. At pembrolizumab initiation, 21/129 (16%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) >1; 51/116 (44%) had elevated lactate dehydrogenase. Median follow-up was 10.5 months (range, 0–25.1); median OS was 19.4 months (95% confidence interval, 14.0–not reached); median PFS was 4.2 months (95% confidence interval, 2.9–5.3). Brain metastases, ECOG PS>1, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and third-line/later (vs. first-line) pembrolizumab were significant predictors (P<0.01) of decreased survival. Treatment-related toxicity was a discontinuation reason for 25% (29/117) of patients, and for 10 of these 29 patients (6% of the full-study cohort) treatment-related toxicity was the only reported reason. The real-world effectiveness and safety of pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma are consistent with clinical trial findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Lance Cowey
- McKesson Specialty Health/The US Oncology Network, The Woodlands.,Skin Malignancy Research and Treatment Center, Baylor University Medical Center.,Texas Oncology PA, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | - Marley Boyd
- McKesson Specialty Health/The US Oncology Network, The Woodlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Klink AJ, Chmielowski B, Feinberg B, Ahsan S, Nero D, Liu FX. Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs in First-Line Treatments for Patients with Metastatic Melanoma in the United States. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2019; 25:869-877. [PMID: 30945965 PMCID: PMC10397699 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.18442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment landscape for patients with metastatic melanoma has changed dramatically with the introduction of novel therapies, such as targeted therapies and immunotherapies, in recent years. Health care resource utilization (HCRU) and cost data are needed to further evaluate these treatments in a value-based health care system. OBJECTIVE To examine HCRU and total cost of care among U.S. metastatic melanoma patients treated with first-line systemic therapies, including immunotherapies, targeted therapies, and chemotherapy. METHODS A retrospective observational study was conducted using a U.S. claims database. Adults with ≥ 2 claims for melanoma and ≥ 1 claim for metastasis between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2017, were identified. Patients had pharmacy and medical enrollment ≥ 6 months before and ≥ 3 months following first-line treatment start. Per patient per month (PPPM) HCRU and costs were calculated by first-line treatment drug class: PD-1 inhibitors, CTLA-4 inhibitors, CTLA-4 + PD-1 combination, BRAF monotherapy, BRAF + MEK combination, and chemotherapy. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for HCRU were estimated by logistic regressions and adjusted costs were estimated by generalized linear models using log-link with gamma distribution to control for differences in patient characteristics across groups. RESULTS Among 1,599 metastatic melanoma patients (PD-1, n = 255; CTLA-4, n = 555; CTLA-4 + PD-1, n = 88; BRAF, n = 210; BRAF + MEK, n=102; chemotherapy=389), mean age ranged from 59-68 years, and the majority were male (62%). Any hospitalization during first-line treatment was less frequent among PD-1-treated patients (25.9%) compared with 34.7%-45.5% of all other groups (all P < 0.05). PPPM hospitalizations were lowest in PD-1 (0.06) compared with 0.09-0.16 across all other groups (all P < 0.05), and PPPM emergency department (ED) visits were lowest in PD-1 (0.09) compared with 0.13-0.18 across all other groups (all P < 0.05), except for BRAF + MEK (0.14, P = 0.08). CTLA-4, CTLA-4 + PD-1, and BRAF + MEK had increased odds of hospitalization compared to PD-1 (adjusted ORs = 2.10, 2.35, 2.15, respectively; all P < 0.05). Total adjusted PPPM costs were significantly lower for PD-1 ($13,059) compared with CTLA-4 ($25,583), CTLA-4 + PD-1 ($31,310), and BRAF + MEK ($21,517) and higher compared to BRAF ($8,158) and chemotherapy ($6,361). CONCLUSIONS Hospitalizations and ED visits represent important HCRU for metastatic melanoma patients and were lowest among PD-1-treated patients compared with any other systemic therapies (except for ED visits when compared with BRAF + MEK). Total monthly costs varied substantially across first-line regimens and were significantly lower in PD-1-treated patients compared with patients treated with CTLA-4, CTLA-4 + PD-1, and BRAF + MEK. DISCLOSURES This study was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co. Klink, Feinberg, and Nero are employees of Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions, which received funding from Merck to conduct this study. Chmielsowki is a consultant to Merck but received no funding for the development of this manuscript. Ahsan and Liu are employees of Merck. Chmielowski reports advisory board/speaker fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Genentech/Roche, Iovance Biotherapeutics, HUYA Bioscience International, Compugen, Array BioPharma, Regeneron, Biothera, Janssen, and Novartis. Ahsan has a patent (US20160008380A1) pending.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bartosz Chmielowski
- Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | | | | | - Damion Nero
- Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions, Columbus, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Postsurgical treatment landscape and economic burden of locoregional and distant recurrence in patients with operable nonmetastatic melanoma. Melanoma Res 2019; 28:618-628. [PMID: 30216199 PMCID: PMC6221390 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Surgery is the mainstay treatment for operable nonmetastatic melanoma, but recurrences are common and limit patients’ survival. This study aimed to describe real-world patterns of treatment and recurrence in patients with melanoma and to quantify healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with episodes of locoregional/distant recurrences. Adults with nonmetastatic melanoma who underwent melanoma lymph node surgery were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan database (1 January 2008 to 31 July 2017). Locoregional and distant recurrence(s) were identified on the basis of postsurgery recurrence indicators (i.e. initiation of new melanoma pharmacotherapy, new radiotherapy, or new surgery; secondary malignancy diagnoses). Of 6400 eligible patients, 219 (3.4%) initiated adjuvant therapy within 3 months of surgery, mostly with interferon α-2b (n=206/219, 94.1%). A total of 1191/6400 (18.6%) patients developed recurrence(s) over a median follow-up of 23.1 months (102/6400, 1.6% distant recurrences). Among the 219 patients initiated on adjuvant therapy, 73 (33.3%) experienced recurrences (distant recurrences: 13/219, 5.9%). The mean total all-cause healthcare cost was $2645 per patient per month (PPPM) during locoregional recurrence episodes and $12 940 PPPM during distant recurrence episodes. In the year after recurrence, HRU was particularly higher in patients with distant recurrence versus recurrence-free matched controls: by 9.2 inpatient admissions, 54.4 inpatient days, 8.8 emergency department admissions, and 185.9 outpatient visits (per 100 person-months), whereas all-cause healthcare costs were higher by $14 953 PPPM. It remains to be determined whether the new generation of adjuvant therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents, will increase the use of adjuvant therapies, and reduce the risk of recurrences and associated HRU/cost.
Collapse
|
13
|
Tarhini A, Atzinger C, Gupte-Singh K, Johnson C, Macahilig C, Rao S. Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with unresectable stage III and metastatic melanoma in the USA. J Comp Eff Res 2019; 8:461-473. [PMID: 30832505 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2019-0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To describe treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with unresectable stage III and metastatic/stage IV melanoma. Materials & methods: An observational retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma before 1 November 2015 who initiated a new line of therapy (LOT) from 1 January 2015 to 31 May 2016. Results: Among 487 patients, ipilimumab monotherapy (27.5%) was the most common first line of therapy (1LOT) in 2015, surpassed by nivolumab monotherapy (21.5%) in 2016. 12-month survival was ≥80.1%; proportions were highest forpatients treated with nivolumab + ipilimumab (86.6%). All treatments relatively well tolerated in real-world setting and adverse events were consistent with the previously reported safety profiles. Conclusion: This study provides important insights into real-world advanced melanoma treatment patterns and demonstrates encouraging treatment safety and patient survival data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Tarhini
- Department of Hematology & Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH 441062, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Sumati Rao
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ 086484, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Whitman ED, Liu FX, Cao X, Diede SJ, Haiderali A, Abernethy AP. Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma in US oncology clinical practices. Future Oncol 2018; 15:459-471. [PMID: 30251550 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To describe recent evolution in treatment patterns and outcomes for advanced melanoma (AMel). METHODS This retrospective observational study analyzed de-identified electronic health record data from the Flatiron Health database for 1140 adult patients who initiated first-line therapy for AMel from 1 January 2014 to 30 June 2016 with follow-up through 28 February 2017. RESULTS The most common first-line regimens were ipilimumab-based therapies (34%), anti-PD-1 monotherapy (26%) and BRAF/MEK inhibitor(s) (20%). First-line ipilimumab-based and BRAF inhibitor regimens decreased after the third quarter of 2014 (3Q2014), and by 2Q2016, 55 and 91% of BRAF-mutant and BRAF wild-type cohorts, respectively, received a first-line anti-PD-1 regimen. Median overall survival from first-line initiation for all patients was 18.8 months (95% CI: 16.3-23.3). CONCLUSION Results illustrate changing paradigms of therapy and real-world patient outcomes for AMel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric D Whitman
- Atlantic Melanoma Center, Atlantic Health System Cancer Care, 100 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ 07960, USA
| | | | - Xiting Cao
- Merck & Co., Inc., 2000 Galloping Hill Rd, Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - Scott J Diede
- Merck & Co., Inc., 2000 Galloping Hill Rd, Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - Amin Haiderali
- Merck & Co., Inc., 2000 Galloping Hill Rd, Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - Amy P Abernethy
- Flatiron Health, Inc., 233 Spring St, New York, NY 10013, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Morgan FC, Duran J, Fraile B, Karia PS, Lin JY, Ott PA, Ruiz ES, Wang DM, Zhang Y, Schmults CD. A comparison of skin cancer screening and treatment costs at a Massachusetts cancer center, 2008 versus 2013. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 79:921-928. [PMID: 30322559 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Revised: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Temporal analyses of skin cancer costs are needed to examine how expenditure differences between diagnoses are changing. OBJECTIVE To tabulate the costs of skin cancer-related care (SCRC), including both screening and treatment, at an academic cancer center at 2 time points. METHODS Cost data (insurance and patient payments) at an academic cancer center from 2008 and 2013 were queried for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes pertaining to skin cancer. Screening costs were separated from treatment costs through associated Current Procedural Terminology codes. RESULTS The total annual cost of SCRC increased by 64%, the number of patients receiving SCRC increased by 45%, and the mean cost per patient treated increased by 13%. Screening accounted for 17% and 16% of total annual costs in 2008 and 2013, respectively. The mean cost per patient with melanoma increased by 84%, which was the largest increase among skin cancer diagnoses. In 2013, the few patients with melanoma who were treated with ipilimumab (n = 48 [4% of patients with melanoma]) accounted for 42% of melanoma treatment costs and 20% of SCRC costs. LIMITATIONS Prescription costs were unavailable. CONCLUSIONS Melanoma costs have increased as a result of the introduction of ipilimumab. Ongoing studies are needed to monitor the cost-effectiveness of SCRC at a national level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederick C Morgan
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Juanita Duran
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Belen Fraile
- Value and Population Health Management, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pritesh S Karia
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Y Lin
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Melanoma Disease Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Patrick A Ott
- Melanoma Disease Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emily Stamell Ruiz
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David M Wang
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yichen Zhang
- Value and Population Health Management, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chrysalyne D Schmults
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Look Hong NJ, Cheng SY, Wright FC, Petrella TM, Earle CC, Mittmann N. Resource utilization and disaggregated cost analysis for initial treatment of melanoma. J Cancer Policy 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2018.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
17
|
Zhou C, Chen X, Zeng W, Peng C, Huang G, Li X, Ouyang Z, Luo Y, Xu X, Xu B, Wang W, He R, Zhang X, Zhang L, Liu J, Knepper TC, He Y, McLeod HL. Propranolol induced G0/G1/S phase arrest and apoptosis in melanoma cells via AKT/MAPK pathway. Oncotarget 2018; 7:68314-68327. [PMID: 27582542 PMCID: PMC5356557 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2016] [Accepted: 08/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Both preclinical and epidemiology studies associate β-adrenoceptors-blockers (β-blockers) with activity against melanoma. However, the underlying mechanism is still unclear, especially in acral melanoma. In this study, we explored the effect of propranolol, a non-selective β-blocker, on the A375 melanoma cell line, two primary acral melanoma cell lines (P-3, P-6) and mice xenografts. Cell viability assay demonstrated that 50μM-400μM of propranolol inhibited viability in a concentration and time dependent manner with an IC50 ranging from 65.33μM to 148.60μM for 24h -72h treatment, but propranolol (less than 200μM) had no effect on HaCaT cell line. Western blots showed 100μM propranolol significantly reduced the expression of Bcl-2 while increasing the expressions of Bax, cytochrome c, cleaved capase-9 and cleaved caspase-3, and down-regulated the levels of p-AKT, p-BRAF, p-MEK1/2 and p-ERK1/2 in melanoma cells, after a 24h incubation. The in vivo data confirmed the isolation results. Mice received daily ip. administration of propranolol at the dose of 2 mg/kg for 3 weeks and the control group was treated with the same volume of saline. The mean tumor volume at day 21 in A375 xenografts was 82.33 ± 3.75mm3vs. 2044.67 ± 54.57mm3 for the propranolol-treated mice and the control group, respectively, and 31.66 ± 4.67 mm3vs. 1074.67 ± 32.17 mm3 for the P-3 xenografts. Propranolol also reduced Ki67, inhibited phosphorylation of AKT, BRAF, MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 in xenografts. These are the first data to demonstrate that propranolol might inhibit melanoma by activating the intrinsic apoptosis pathway and inactivating the MAPK and AKT pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengfang Zhou
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, XiangYa Hospital, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, China
| | - Xiang Chen
- Department of Dermatology, XiangYa Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Weiqi Zeng
- Department of Dermatology, XiangYa Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Cong Peng
- Department of Dermatology, XiangYa Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Gang Huang
- Department of Orthopedics, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Xian'an Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Zhengxiao Ouyang
- Department of Orthopedics, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Yi Luo
- Department of Orthopedics, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Xuezheng Xu
- Department of Orthopedics, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Biaobo Xu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, XiangYa Hospital, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, China
| | - Weili Wang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, XiangYa Hospital, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, China
| | - Ruohui He
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, XiangYa Hospital, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, China
| | - Xu Zhang
- Department of Dermatology, XiangYa Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Liyang Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiang-Ya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jie Liu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, XiangYa Hospital, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, China
| | - Todd C Knepper
- Moffitt Cancer Center, DeBartolo Family Personalized Medicine Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Yijing He
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, XiangYa Hospital, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, China.,Moffitt Cancer Center, DeBartolo Family Personalized Medicine Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Dermatology, XiangYa Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Howard L McLeod
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, XiangYa Hospital, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, China.,Moffitt Cancer Center, DeBartolo Family Personalized Medicine Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sagar B, Lin YS, Castel LD. Cost drivers for breast, lung, and colorectal cancer care in a commercially insured population over a 6-month episode: an economic analysis from a health plan perspective. J Med Econ 2017; 20:1018-1023. [PMID: 28581874 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1339353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
AIMS In the absence of clinical data, accurate identification of cost drivers is needed for economic comparison in an alternate payment model. From a health plan perspective using claims data in a commercial population, the objective was to identify and quantify the effects of cost drivers in economic models of breast, lung, and colorectal cancer costs over a 6-month episode following initial chemotherapy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This study analyzed claims data from 9,748 Cigna beneficiaries with diagnosis of breast, lung, and colorectal cancer following initial chemotherapy from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015. We used multivariable regression models to quantify the impact of key factors on cost during the initial 6-month cancer care episode. RESULTS Metastasis, facility provider affiliation, episode risk group (ERG) risk score, and radiation were cost drivers for all three types of cancer (breast, lung, and colorectal). In addition, younger age (p < .0001) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 oncogene overexpression (HER2+)-directed therapy (p < .0001) were associated with higher costs in breast cancer. Younger age (p < .0001) and female gender (p < .0001) were also associated with higher costs in colorectal cancer. Metastasis was also associated with 50% more hospital admissions and increased hospital length of stay (p < .001) in all three cancers over the 6-month episode duration. Chemotherapy and supportive drug therapies accounted for the highest proportion (48%) of total medical costs among beneficiaries observed. CONCLUSIONS Value-based reimbursement models in oncology should appropriately account for key cost drivers. Although claims-based methodologies may be further augmented with clinical data, this study recommends adjusting for the factors identified in these models to predict costs in breast, lung, and colorectal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhuvana Sagar
- a Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company , Plano , TX , USA
| | - Yu Shen Lin
- b Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| | - Liana D Castel
- c Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company , Bloomfield , CT , USA
- d University of Mount Olive Tillman School of Business , Mount Olive , NC , USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
McArthur GA, Mohr P, Ascierto PA, Arance A, Banos Hernaez A, Kaskel P, Weichenthal M, Shinde R, Stevinson K. Health Care Resource Utilization and Associated Costs Among Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma Patients Treated with Ipilimumab (INTUITION Study). Oncologist 2017; 22:951-962. [PMID: 28526721 PMCID: PMC5553953 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2016] [Accepted: 02/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited real-world data on health care resource utilization (HCRU) among advanced melanoma patients. The objective of this study was to describe HCRU and health care costs associated with the management of advanced melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab. METHODS This retrospective multinational, observational study included advanced melanoma patients from Australia, Germany, Italy, and Spain who had received at least 1 dose of ipilimumab. Data extracted from medical charts included inpatient admissions, outpatient visits, surgical procedures, laboratory investigations, radiation therapy, imaging studies, and concomitant medications. Cost estimates were based on unit costs from country-specific standard reimbursement sources. Subgroup analyses were performed for BRAF mutation status and ipilimumab refractory patients, who had disease progression within 24 weeks of their last dose of ipilimumab. RESULTS Mean age of 362 enrolled patients was 60.6 years (standard deviation [SD] 14.4). During a median follow-up period of 30.2 weeks, 57% of patients were admitted to hospital and 16% underwent surgery. Health care resource utilization rates varied substantially across countries and were highest in Germany. Concomitant medications to treat adverse events were commonly used. Subgroup analyses showed higher utilization rates among ipilimumab refractory and BRAF mutant patients. Mean weekly total costs associated with HCRU were lower in the pre-progression period (€107; 95% confidence interval (CI): 79-145) than in the post-progression period (€216; 95% CI: 180-259). CONCLUSION Health care resource utilization pattern and associated costs among patients treated with ipilimumab varied greatly among countries and between pre- and post-progression periods. There is a high economic burden associated with ipilimumab refractory melanoma. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Metastatic melanoma patients treated with the anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab have a high utilization of various types of health care services, such as inpatient hospital stays or doctor visits. There are differences across countries regarding patterns of health care utilization and economic burden of the disease. Health care services are used more frequently after patients experience progression of their disease. The study highlights that better therapies leading to durable response in patients with metastatic melanoma have the potential to decrease health care costs and patient burden in terms of hospitalizations and other health care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Mohr
- Elbe-Klinikum Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany
| | | | - Ana Arance
- Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tkaczyk E. Innovations and Developments in Dermatologic Non-invasive Optical Imaging and Potential Clinical Applications. Acta Derm Venereol 2017; Suppl 218:5-13. [PMID: 28676880 PMCID: PMC5943168 DOI: 10.2340/00015555-2717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Most dermatologists are aware of the benefits of dermoscopy, and a few are familiar with laser-scanning confocal microscopy. Beyond confocal, there are fully 11 different categories of optical techniques that have been applied to clinical dermatology. This article first provides a comprehensive tabular overview of all these optical diagnostic technologies and then details 4 of the lesser known innovations that are already available or still in development (laser Doppler and speckle imaging, Raman spectroscopy, multiphoton microscopy, photoacoustic tomography), with some potential applications in clinical dermatology (blood flow monitoring, skin cancer diagnosis, composition measurements in atopic dermatitis, skin rejuvenation measurement, and noninvasive sentinel lymph node assessment in melanoma). These methods present many advantages, being non-invasive, portable, and rapid. The development of optics in biological and biomedical sciences (i.e. biophotonics) requires not only deep insight into the applications but also synergistic collaboration between engineers and clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Tkaczyk
- One Hundred Oaks Suite 26300, 719 Thompson Lane, TN 37204 Nashville, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gwadry-Sridhar F, Nikan S, Hamou A, Seung SJ, Petrella T, Joshua AM, Ernst S, Mittmann N. Resource utilization and costs of managing patients with advanced melanoma: a Canadian population-based study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 24:168-175. [PMID: 28680276 DOI: 10.3747/co.24.3432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use and detailed costs of services provided for people with advanced melanoma (amel) are not well known. We conducted an analysis to determine the use of health care services and the associated costs delineated by relevant attributable costs, which we defined for subjects in the province of Ontario. METHODS Through the Ontario Cancer Data Linkage Project, a cohort of amel patients with diagnoses between 31 August 2005 and 2012 (follow-up to 2013) and with valid International Classification of Diseases (9th revision, Clinical Modification) 172 codes and histology codes was identified. A cohort of individuals with amel having a combination of at least 1 palliative, 1 medical oncology, and 1 hospitalization code was generated. The health system services used by this population were clustered into hospitalization, palliation, physician medical visits, medication, homecare, laboratory, diagnostics, and other resources. Overall rates of use and disaggregated costs were determined by phase of care for the entire cohort. RESULTS The mean age for the 2748 individuals in the cohort was 67 years. The greater proportion of the patients were men (65.6%) and were more than 65 years of age (>50%). In this advanced cohort, fewer than 45% of patients were alive 3 years after the malignant melanoma diagnosis. The average annual cost per patient over the time horizon was $6,551. At $15,830, year 1 after diagnosis was the most expensive, followed by year 2, at $8,166. CONCLUSIONS Our data provide a baseline for the costs associated with amel treatment. Future studies will include newer agents and comparative effectiveness research for personalized therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - S J Seung
- Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomics (hope) Research Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto
| | - T Petrella
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto
| | - A M Joshua
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto; and
| | - S Ernst
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON
| | - N Mittmann
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Harries M, Mohr P, Grange F, Ehness R, Benjamin L, Siakpere O, Barth J, Stapelkamp C, Pfersch S, McLeod L, Wolowacz S, Kaye JA, Kontoudis I. Treatment patterns and outcomes of Stage IIIB/IIIC melanoma in France, Germany and the UK: A retrospective and prospective observational study (MELABIS). Int J Clin Pract 2017; 71:e12946. [PMID: 28508460 PMCID: PMC5697614 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Real-world data on treatment patterns/outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma, while scarce, are useful for health technology assessments that govern patient access in many countries. We collected retrospective data on treatment patterns among patients in France, Germany and the UK with Stage IIIB/IIIC melanoma with macroscopic lymph node involvement, whose primary melanoma and regional lymph node metastases had been completely resected. METHODS Patients ≥18 years were diagnosed between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2011. Data were obtained from patients' medical records and a patient survey. RESULTS Forty-nine centres provided data on 558 patients: 53.6% had Stage IIIB disease; 58.2% were of working age (<65 years), 22.5% reported a change in employment status due to melanoma, 8% were on long-term sick leave; and 35.1% were deceased over the study period. Overall median distant metastases-free survival was 23.4 months and median disease-free survival was 13.3 months. Hospitalisation frequency increased during distant metastatic/terminal disease phases. Adjuvant therapy was received by 7.0% (14/199) of patients in France, 2.6% (5/195) in the UK, and 33.5% (55/164) in Germany. Low-dose interferon was used more frequently than other regimens. High-dose interferon was associated with discontinuation in 28.6% and dose delay/reduction in 33.3% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Rapid disease progression combined with increased use of healthcare resources in later phases of disease result in a high burden-of-illness for patients and healthcare providers. The use of adjuvant interferon therapy varies considerably in this population in the countries studied, highlighting the need for improved treatments for melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Harries
- Department of Medical OncologyGuy's and St Thomas's Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustGuy's HospitalLondonUK
| | - Peter Mohr
- Clinic of DermatologyElbekliniken BuxtehudeBuxtehudeGermany
| | | | - Rainer Ehness
- GSK GmbH & Co KGMunichGermany
- Present address:
Novartis OncologyNuernbergGermany
| | - Laure Benjamin
- GSK France78163 Marly le Roi cedexFrance
- Present address:
Janssen (Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson)Issy‐les‐MoulineauxFrance
| | | | - Janina Barth
- GSK GmbH & Co KGMunichGermany
- Present address:
Novartis OncologyNuernbergGermany
| | | | - Sylvie Pfersch
- GSK France78163 Marly le Roi cedexFrance
- Present address:
Les Laboratoires Pierre FabreBoulogne‐BillancourtFrance
| | - Lori McLeod
- Patient Reported OutcomesRTI Health SolutionsResearch Triangle ParkNCUSA
| | - Sorrel Wolowacz
- Health EconomicsRTI Health SolutionsThe Pavilion, Towers Business Park, Wilmslow Road ManchesterManchesterUK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kohn CG, Zeichner SB, Chen Q, Montero AJ, Goldstein DA, Flowers CR. Cost-Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:1194-1202. [PMID: 28221865 PMCID: PMC5791832 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.69.6336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Patients who are diagnosed with stage IV metastatic melanoma have an estimated 5-year relative survival rate of only 17%. Randomized controlled trials of recent US Food and Drug Administration-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors-pembrolizumab (PEM), nivolumab (NIVO), and ipilumumab (IPI)-demonstrate improved patient outcomes, but the optimal treatment sequence in patients with BRAF wild-type metastatic melanoma remains unclear. To inform policy makers about the value of these treatments, we developed a Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of different strategies for sequencing novel agents for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Materials and Methods We developed Markov models by using a US-payer perspective and lifetime horizon to estimate costs (2016 US$) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for treatment sequences with first-line NIVO, IPI, NIVO + IPI, PEM every 2 weeks, and PEM every 3 weeks. Health states were defined for initial treatment, first and second progression, and death. Rates for drug discontinuation, frequency of adverse events, disease progression, and death obtained from randomized phase III trials were used to determine the likelihood of transition between states. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate model uncertainty. Results PEM every 3 weeks followed by second-line IPI was both more effective and less costly than dacarbazine followed by IPI then NIVO, or IPI followed by NIVO. Compared with the first-line dacarbazine treatment strategy, NIVO followed by IPI produced an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of $90,871/QALY, and first-line NIVO + IPI followed by carboplatin plus paclitaxel chemotherapy produced an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of $198,867/QALY. Conclusion For patients with treatment-naive BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma, first-line PEM every 3 weeks followed by second-line IPI or first-line NIVO followed by second-line IPI are the most cost-effective, immune-based treatment strategies for metastatic melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine G. Kohn
- Christine G. Kohn, University of Saint Joseph School of Pharmacy; Christine G. Kohn, University of Connecticut/Hartford Hospital Evidence-Based Practice Center, Hartford, CT; Simon B. Zeichner, Daniel A. Goldstein, and Christopher R. Flowers, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University; Qiushi Chen, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA; Alberto J. Montero, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; and Daniel A. Goldstein, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Simon B. Zeichner
- Christine G. Kohn, University of Saint Joseph School of Pharmacy; Christine G. Kohn, University of Connecticut/Hartford Hospital Evidence-Based Practice Center, Hartford, CT; Simon B. Zeichner, Daniel A. Goldstein, and Christopher R. Flowers, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University; Qiushi Chen, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA; Alberto J. Montero, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; and Daniel A. Goldstein, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Qiushi Chen
- Christine G. Kohn, University of Saint Joseph School of Pharmacy; Christine G. Kohn, University of Connecticut/Hartford Hospital Evidence-Based Practice Center, Hartford, CT; Simon B. Zeichner, Daniel A. Goldstein, and Christopher R. Flowers, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University; Qiushi Chen, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA; Alberto J. Montero, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; and Daniel A. Goldstein, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Alberto J. Montero
- Christine G. Kohn, University of Saint Joseph School of Pharmacy; Christine G. Kohn, University of Connecticut/Hartford Hospital Evidence-Based Practice Center, Hartford, CT; Simon B. Zeichner, Daniel A. Goldstein, and Christopher R. Flowers, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University; Qiushi Chen, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA; Alberto J. Montero, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; and Daniel A. Goldstein, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Daniel A. Goldstein
- Christine G. Kohn, University of Saint Joseph School of Pharmacy; Christine G. Kohn, University of Connecticut/Hartford Hospital Evidence-Based Practice Center, Hartford, CT; Simon B. Zeichner, Daniel A. Goldstein, and Christopher R. Flowers, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University; Qiushi Chen, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA; Alberto J. Montero, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; and Daniel A. Goldstein, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Christopher R. Flowers
- Christine G. Kohn, University of Saint Joseph School of Pharmacy; Christine G. Kohn, University of Connecticut/Hartford Hospital Evidence-Based Practice Center, Hartford, CT; Simon B. Zeichner, Daniel A. Goldstein, and Christopher R. Flowers, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University; Qiushi Chen, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA; Alberto J. Montero, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; and Daniel A. Goldstein, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ma Q, Chen YJ, Hines DM, Munakata J, Batty N, Barber BL, Zhao Z. Patterns of use of systemic therapies among patients with metastatic melanoma: a retrospective claims database analysis in the United States. J DERMATOL TREAT 2017; 28:549-553. [DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2016.1277176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Qiufei Ma
- Department of Global Health Economics, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | | | - Dionne M. Hines
- Health Economics & Outcomes Research, IMS Health, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Julie Munakata
- Real World Evidence Solutions, IMS Health, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nicolas Batty
- Department of Medical Affairs, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Beth Louise Barber
- Department of Global Health Economics, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Zhongyun Zhao
- Department of Global Health Economics, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Curiel-Lewandrowski C, Swetter SM. Lack of harms from community-based melanoma screening by primary care providers. Cancer 2016; 122:3102-3105. [PMID: 27392136 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Revised: 06/07/2016] [Accepted: 06/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan M Swetter
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.,Dermatology Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|