Comparison of flunisolide and beclomethasone dipropionate in seasonal allergic rhinitis

Intranasal corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis

Intranasal corticosteroids are accepted as safe and effective first-line therapy for allergic rhinitis. Several intranasal corticosteroids are available: beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide, flunisolide, fluticasone propionate, mometasone furoate, and triamcinolone acetonide. All are efficacious in treating seasonal allergic rhinitis and as prophylaxis for perennial allergic rhinitis. In general, they relieve nasal congestion and itching, rhinorrhea, and sneezing that occur in the early and late phases of allergic response, with studies showing almost complete prevention of late-phase symptoms. The rationale for topical intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis is that adequate drug concentrations can be achieved at receptor sites in the nasal mucosa. This leads to symptom control and reduces the risk of systemic adverse effects. Adverse reactions usually are limited to the nasal mucosa, such as dryness, burning and stinging, and sneezing, together with headache and epistaxis in 5-10% of patients regardless of formulation or compound. Differences among agents are limited to potency, patient preference, dosing regimens, and delivery, device and vehicle.

Intranasal corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis: superior relief?

Whether first-line pharmacological treatment of allergic rhinitis should be antihistamines or intranasal corticosteroids has been discussed for several years. First-generation antihistamines are rarely used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, mainly because of sedative and anticholinergic adverse effects. On the basis of clinical evidence of efficacy, no second-generation antihistamine seems preferable to another. Similarly, comparisons of topical and oral antihistamines have been unable to demonstrate superior efficacy for one method of administration over the other. Current data documents no striking differences in efficacy and safety parameters between intranasal corticosteroids. When the efficacy of antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids are compared in patients with allergic rhinitis, present data favours intranasal corticosteroids. Interestingly, data do not show antihistamines as superior for the treatment of conjunctivitis. Safety data from comparative studies in patients with allergic rhinitis do not indicate differences between antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids. Combining antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis does not provide any additional effect to intranasal corticosteroids alone. On the basis of current data, intranasal corticosteroids seem to offer superior relief in allergic rhinitis than antihistamines.

Effectiveness and safety of beclomethasone dipropionate, an intranasal corticosteroid, in the treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis

There is an increasing trend toward topical intranasal corticosteroids as the preferred treatment for seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis. This trend is based on the fact that the chronic, mucosal inflammation that accompanies allergic rhinitis responds to anti-inflammatory drugs such as topical corticosteroids. Intranasal corticosteroids, given before the natural antigen challenge, reverse preexisting inflammation and prevent nasal priming by antigens. One intranasal corticosteroid, beclomethasone dipropionate, has been available by prescription in the United States for more than a decade and has an established efficacy and safety profile in patients with allergic rhinitis. Beclomethasone dipropionate has become the standard to which other intranasal corticosteroid preparations are compared. In comparison with earlier corticosteroids (eg, hydrocortisone, prednisolone, dexamethasone, betamethasone) that caused adrenal suppression and other systemic adverse reactions, the actions of new corticosteroids, including beclomethasone dipropionate, are confined to the site of application. These drugs are also more rapidly metabolized, less irritating to the nasal mucosa, and have a longer duration of action. When given intranasally to relieve the sneezing, congestion, and rhinorrhea associated with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis, the newer corticosteroids have proved safe and effective. Despite the fact that topical nasal corticosteroids such as beclomethasone dipropionate are responsible for important improvements in the treatment of both allergic and nonallergic rhinitis as well as nasal polyposis and chronic sinusitis, these drugs may be underused, particularly in the pediatric population. Because of the concern of systemic side effects in younger children, less effective therapies are sometimes used.

Management of allergic rhinitis: focus on intranasal agents

The clinical manifestations of allergic rhinitis are the result of an immune-mediated process after exposure of a sensitized individual to airborne allergens. The primary symptomatology includes nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal and conjunctival pruritus, and sneezing. Principles of management include allergen avoidance, palliative therapy, immunotherapy, and pharmacotherapy. Oral decongestants stimulate alpha-adrenergic receptors in the nasal cavity, resulting in vasoconstriction and decreased edema. Oral antihistamines block histamine1 (H1) receptors, and may relieve rhinorrhea, sneezing, and nasal and conjunctival pruritus. Topical decongestants have a local effect on adrenergic receptors in the nasal mucosa, resulting in rapid, marked vasoconstriction. Intranasal corticosteroids inhibit mediator release from mast cells and basophils, and reduce edema of the nasal mucosa. Dexamethasone sodium phosphate, beclomethasone dipropionate, and flunisolide are currently available for intranasal administration. Cromolyn sodium inhibits allergen-induced degranulation and mediator release from sensitized cells, and is useful primarily as a prophylactic agent. Several agents, including the corticosteroids budesonide and flucortin butylester, the mast cell-stabilizing agent nedocromil sodium, the anticholinergic agent ipratropium bromide, and the H1 receptor antagonist levocabastine are being investigated for intranasal use in the management of allergic rhinitis.

In vitro effect of beclomethasone dipropionate and flunisolide on the mobility of human nasal cilia

Human nasal cilia were perfused with aqueous solutions of two corticosteroid aerosols, beclomethasone dipropionate (BPD) and flunisolide, with the main preservative of flunisolide, propylene glycol, and with placebo. The concentration used were BPD 0.1 mg/ml, 0.05 mg/ml, 0.005 mg/ml and 0.0005 mg/ml, flunisolide 0.25 mg/ml, 0.05 mg/ml, 0.025 mg/ml and 0.00025 mg/ml, and propylene glycol 20 mg/ml and 200 mg/ml. A dose-related decrease in ciliary beating frequency (CBF) was seen after perfusion with both BDP and flunisolide as well as propylene glycol. The decrease in CBF following perfusion with propylene glycol was partially reversible upon re-perfusion with medium alone, whereas the decrease seen after BDP and flunisolide was irreversible. Although previous studies have shown no adverse effect on the mucous membrane except for the areas hit by the impact of the sprays, our results suggest that caution should be taken when the dose and/or the length of treatment is considered, and that the effect of administration of these drugs on CBF in vivo needs to be investigated.

Efficacy of beclomethasone nasal solution, flunisolide, and cromolyn in relieving symptoms of ragweed allergy

Although three effective topical treatments for allergic rhinitis are available, little information to assist the clinician in choosing among them has been reported. Therefore, we conducted a randomized clinical trial to compare beclomethasone nasal solution, flunisolide, and cromolyn with placebo in 120 patients with hay fever during the ragweed season of 1984. We found that all three agents were superior to placebo (P less than 0.001) and that the glucocorticoids were more effective than cromolyn (P less than 0.001). Surprisingly, we also found that these intranasal treatments considerably reduced the symptoms of seasonal asthma. Further study of this therapeutic advantage is needed.